Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Somebody should say a few words. This profession has been lamenting in fragments for two years with a headstone that turns out to have the wrong name on it. Dave Kiss delivered a masterclass at Resend Forward. Listen, grieve, and leave renewed with hope.

74,630 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Hank Taylor's profile picture
Hank Taylor3 days ago

@davekiss this was incredible

Resend's profile picture
Resend3 days ago

Prefer YouTube?

Resend's profile picture
Resend3 days ago

Missed Resend Forward? Here's what you missed 👇

smr's profile picture
smr3 days ago

@davekiss That felt way more cathartic than I had expected. Amazing talk.

Michael Dyrynda's profile picture
Michael Dyrynda3 days ago

@joetannenbaum @davekiss Casket prop!

Angie Jones's profile picture
Angie Jones2 days ago

@davekiss BRILLIANTLY done! 👏🏾

Aaron Dowd's profile picture
Aaron Dowd2 days ago

@davekiss Well done

Dawson Botsford's profile picture
Dawson Botsford2 days ago

@davekiss Perfect talk. Aside from calling the goat “Lee-noose”

Nnenna's profile picture
Nnenna2 days ago

@davekiss We love David! 👏🏽

Related Videos

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

CTrefugees

135,314 views • 5 months ago