Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Someone should let Carragher know that it’s not the first time we’ve seen the ‘Get into em’ flag - we took it “too far” apparently 🤷‍♂️ #NUFC ⚫️⚪️⚫️⚪️ Wor Flags 🏴🏳

588,409 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

No one will read this: But when one goes through the list of “race laws” the IRR talks about… you actually get shocked. I went in expecting hardcore stuff like “No whites allowed in University” or “No whites allowed in Hospitals” etc… but noo. It’s the Gambling Act, South African Weather Service Act, Boxing Act, Tourism Act, Broadcasting Act, National Sport and Recreation Act, National Health Laboratory Service Act, Civil Aviation Act, Electronic Communications Act, etc. listed. Here is the website: And they’re listed… not because they segregate anyone, but simply because they mention the words transformation or redress, some coz they require some racial/sex/disability or even sector-specific representation such as “required Faith based leader,” youth representation, community or stakeholder groups, and even professional or sectoral expertise on regulatory boards where some of those groups historically or recently weren’t part of those structures. My personal opinion: ⚠️ Yes it is concerning that there are no clear end goals… no cut-off timelines… no measurable targets. South Africa hasn’t had a purely merit based system for over 100 years. I don’t think transformation pressures should be a permanent feature of society. There has to be parts of our system where we declare victory and let other systems take over now. And where these pressures don’t always succeed, alternative tools need to be explored. Keeping something say for example BEE forever, even when it isn’t achieving the intended goals, becomes very hard to defend. We need the best of each community competing with the best of other communities…that’s the only way to get the ultimate best of our communities running our society. Also: 𝗨𝗽𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗔𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗼-𝗘𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗥𝗮𝗰𝗲 (2025) 𝗔𝗱𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝗟𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 (2022–2024) • ⚫️ African: 88–90% functional literacy • 🟠 Coloured: 90–92% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: 95–97% • ⚪️ White: ~99% 𝗨𝗻𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 (Q3 2025 Estimates) • ⚫️ African: 37.9% official / 49.8% expanded • 🟠 Coloured: 24.1% / 31.2% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: 16.3% / 19.5% • ⚪️ White: 7.4% / 9.1% 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗔𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 • ⚫️ African: 12.5% • 🟠 Coloured: 10.1% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: ~34% • ⚪️ White: ~45% 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗘𝗻𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 (Age 20–24) • ⚫️ African: 26.9% • 🟠 Coloured: 20.3% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: 59.7% • ⚪️ White: 59.8% 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 – 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 • ⚫️ African: ~59–62% • 🟠 Coloured: ~4–6% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: ~3–4% • ⚪️ White: ~38–40% 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 – 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 • ⚫️ African: ~88–90% • 🟠 Coloured: ~4–5% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: ~1–2% • ⚪️ White: ~3–4% 𝗝𝗦𝗘-𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 (Total, Direct + Indirect) • ⚫️ African: ~32–33% • 🟠 Coloured: ~2–3% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: ~5–8% • ⚪️ White: ~20–22% (domestic; foreign-held portion separate) 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 – 𝗙𝗮𝗿𝗺𝘀 & 𝗔𝗴𝗿𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗛𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 • ⚪️ White: ~72% • 🟠 Coloured: ~15% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: ~5% • ⚫️ African: ~4% 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 – 𝗨𝗿𝗯𝗮𝗻 / 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗘𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗻 • ⚪️ White: ~49% • ⚫️ African: ~30% • 🟠 Coloured: ~8% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: ~8% • (Corporate/Trust/Other: balance — not race-specific) 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗶𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 • ⚫️ African: ~9.8% • 🟠 Coloured: ~19.6% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: ~41.3% • ⚪️ White: ~71.7% 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝘆 (2024 Estimates) • ⚪️ White: 71.1 (M) / 77.4 (F) • 🟤 Indian/Asian: 69.5 / 75.1 • 🟠 Coloured: 63.8 / 69.5 • ⚫️ African: 60.4 / 66.5 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝘂𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗮𝘁𝗲 (Risk per 100,000) • 🟠 Coloured: > 60 • ⚫️ African: 35–40 • 🟤 Indian/Asian: < 10 • ⚪️ White: < 5 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗣𝗼𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 (Incarceration) • ⚫️ African: 79% (Locals ~64%) + (foreign nationals ~15%) • 🟠 Coloured: ~18% • 🟤 Indian/Asian: < 1% • ⚪️ White: ~2%

𝑺𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒍𝒆 𝑴𝒔𝒊𝒃𝒊 Ⓜ

44,749 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад