Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 SOMEONE SHOW THIS TO NVIDIA BULLS 🚨 Left chart: Cisco in 2000 Right chart: Nvidia in 2026 Take a minute and actually look at them In 2000 Cisco was the most important company in the world The internet was going to change everything. Everyone knew it. Everyone bought...

WhaleNoName's profile picture

NoName

49,195 subscribers

18,375 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 NVIDIA IN 2026 LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE CISCO IN 2000 Cisco was the face of the dot-com era - everyone knew the internet would change everything, so everyone bought Cisco They were right about the internet. But stocks still dropped 86% from its peak Nvidia is the face of the AI era - same narrative, same euphoria, same crowded trade Being right about the technology doesn't protect you from being wrong about the price The chart on the right is following the same path as the chart on the left You've been warned
0:42

🚨 NVIDIA IN 2026 LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE CISCO IN 2000 Cisco was the face of the dot-com era - everyone knew the internet would change everything, so everyone bought Cisco They were right about the internet. But stocks still dropped 86% from its peak Nvidia is the face of the AI era - same narrative, same euphoria, same crowded trade Being right about the technology doesn't protect you from being wrong about the price The chart on the right is following the same path as the chart on the left You've been warned

NoName

195,297 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 NVIDIA WILL REPEAT CISCO 2000 CRASH IN 2026!! Cisco was the face of the dot-com era - everyone knew the internet would change everything, so everyone bought Cisco They were right about the internet. But stocks still dropped 86% from its peak Nvidia is the face of the AI era - same narrative, same euphoria, same crowded trade Being right about the technology doesn't protect you from being wrong about the price The chart on the right is following the same path as the chart on the left Remember, I was the only one publicly calling the exact bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.
0:28

🚨 NVIDIA WILL REPEAT CISCO 2000 CRASH IN 2026!! Cisco was the face of the dot-com era - everyone knew the internet would change everything, so everyone bought Cisco They were right about the internet. But stocks still dropped 86% from its peak Nvidia is the face of the AI era - same narrative, same euphoria, same crowded trade Being right about the technology doesn't protect you from being wrong about the price The chart on the right is following the same path as the chart on the left Remember, I was the only one publicly calling the exact bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

DANNY

62,133 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT CISCO 2000 And nobody is ready. In 1999, Cisco was the backbone of the Internet. Real company. Real revenue. It was the most valuable company on Earth. Then the bubble burst. Cisco crashed almost 90%. Here's the real tragedy: The internet DID change the world. Cisco WAS right. But the stock? 25 years later, it still hasn't recovered to its 2000 peak. Now look at 2026. SpaceX just went public at $2 TRILLION. Everyone is calling it “the backbone of the Space Age.” Same story. Same narrative. But the setup is even more dangerous than Cisco: Much higher valuation. Extreme retail FOMO at the top. Market sitting at historic overvaluation. That's not an opportunity. That's a trap. Most people think buying the "future infrastructure" means guaranteed gains. But being right about the future doesn't mean you're right about the price. Cisco proved you can build the future and still destroy your investors. So now you have two choices: Chase the most expensive infrastructure IPO in history at the peak… Or understand what Cisco 2000 already showed you. Remember, I've predicted every major turn for the last 10 years, including the exact 2022 S&P 500 bottom and the recent 7,600 top. My next call will be the biggest one this cycle. Turn notifications on. Most people will follow me too late.
0:31

🚨 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT CISCO 2000 And nobody is ready. In 1999, Cisco was the backbone of the Internet. Real company. Real revenue. It was the most valuable company on Earth. Then the bubble burst. Cisco crashed almost 90%. Here's the real tragedy: The internet DID change the world. Cisco WAS right. But the stock? 25 years later, it still hasn't recovered to its 2000 peak. Now look at 2026. SpaceX just went public at $2 TRILLION. Everyone is calling it “the backbone of the Space Age.” Same story. Same narrative. But the setup is even more dangerous than Cisco: Much higher valuation. Extreme retail FOMO at the top. Market sitting at historic overvaluation. That's not an opportunity. That's a trap. Most people think buying the "future infrastructure" means guaranteed gains. But being right about the future doesn't mean you're right about the price. Cisco proved you can build the future and still destroy your investors. So now you have two choices: Chase the most expensive infrastructure IPO in history at the peak… Or understand what Cisco 2000 already showed you. Remember, I've predicted every major turn for the last 10 years, including the exact 2022 S&P 500 bottom and the recent 7,600 top. My next call will be the biggest one this cycle. Turn notifications on. Most people will follow me too late.

MARMOT

555,241 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

AI BUBBLE JUST REACHED THE DOTCOM PEAK Look at this chart carefully 2 bubbles and 2 parabolic runs. Both peaking at the exact same level Last time this level printed - it was 2000 Everyone was right about the internet back then But it didn't matter Right now everyone is right about AI The chart is at the exact same peak Draw your own conclusions FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON!
0:35

AI BUBBLE JUST REACHED THE DOTCOM PEAK Look at this chart carefully 2 bubbles and 2 parabolic runs. Both peaking at the exact same level Last time this level printed - it was 2000 Everyone was right about the internet back then But it didn't matter Right now everyone is right about AI The chart is at the exact same peak Draw your own conclusions FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON!

bee🐝

29,208 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

WARNING: 🩸 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT CISCO 2000. In 1999, Cisco was the backbone of the internet. Real company. Real revenue. The most valuable company on Earth. Then the bubble burst. Cisco crashed almost 90%. Now SpaceX went public near $2 trillion. "The backbone of the Space & AI Age." The charts are completely different. The idea is identical: overvaluation. Being right about the future doesn't make you right about the price.
0:26

WARNING: 🩸 SPACEX IS ABOUT TO REPEAT CISCO 2000. In 1999, Cisco was the backbone of the internet. Real company. Real revenue. The most valuable company on Earth. Then the bubble burst. Cisco crashed almost 90%. Now SpaceX went public near $2 trillion. "The backbone of the Space & AI Age." The charts are completely different. The idea is identical: overvaluation. Being right about the future doesn't make you right about the price.

Crypto Rover

195,172 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 SOMETHING VERY STRANGE IS HAPPENING The stock market keeps pushing to new all-time highs. But nobody is paying attention to what’s actually happening. A huge AI bubble is inflating at incredible speed and is about to pop. This has happened before. 2000: Cisco was the king of the internet. Routers. Switches. Infrastructure. Everyone thought it would own the future. Then Cisco crashed -90% and never fully recovered. Now look at today: Nvidia is the god of AI. Chips. Data centers. Infrastructure. The entire market is now tied to one company. The Magnificent 7 control roughly 30% of the S&P 500. If Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta don’t get real returns, they cut spending. If they cut spending, Nvidia orders collapse. If Nvidia collapses, the whole market follows. It’s a bubble built around one company. 2000 was Cisco. 2026 is Nvidia. Remember, I’ve predicted all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the exact Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.
0:33

🚨 SOMETHING VERY STRANGE IS HAPPENING The stock market keeps pushing to new all-time highs. But nobody is paying attention to what’s actually happening. A huge AI bubble is inflating at incredible speed and is about to pop. This has happened before. 2000: Cisco was the king of the internet. Routers. Switches. Infrastructure. Everyone thought it would own the future. Then Cisco crashed -90% and never fully recovered. Now look at today: Nvidia is the god of AI. Chips. Data centers. Infrastructure. The entire market is now tied to one company. The Magnificent 7 control roughly 30% of the S&P 500. If Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta don’t get real returns, they cut spending. If they cut spending, Nvidia orders collapse. If Nvidia collapses, the whole market follows. It’s a bubble built around one company. 2000 was Cisco. 2026 is Nvidia. Remember, I’ve predicted all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the exact Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

438,854 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THIS CHART 🚨 The S&P 500 has run the same cycle for 100 YEARS 25 years bull. 9-12 years bear. Every single time And everyone is pointing to this chart saying we're still in the bull I've heard this theory many times. I understand the logic I just don't think it works this time Every previous bull was driven by a technology that took decades to price in AI took 2 years And what do we have right now? - Valuations at 100-year extremes - Smart money exiting - Distribution signals everywhere - Insiders selling - Buffett sitting on record cash - Burry calling this 1999 The 25-year cycle assumes the catalyst lasts 25 years This one already burned out I called the BTC top at 115k Called the S&P distribution before the drop Called the Nvidia fractal before anyone was talking about it Three cycles of experience. Every major move predicted in advance If you're not following yet - that's on you FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON!
0:53

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THIS CHART 🚨 The S&P 500 has run the same cycle for 100 YEARS 25 years bull. 9-12 years bear. Every single time And everyone is pointing to this chart saying we're still in the bull I've heard this theory many times. I understand the logic I just don't think it works this time Every previous bull was driven by a technology that took decades to price in AI took 2 years And what do we have right now? - Valuations at 100-year extremes - Smart money exiting - Distribution signals everywhere - Insiders selling - Buffett sitting on record cash - Burry calling this 1999 The 25-year cycle assumes the catalyst lasts 25 years This one already burned out I called the BTC top at 115k Called the S&P distribution before the drop Called the Nvidia fractal before anyone was talking about it Three cycles of experience. Every major move predicted in advance If you're not following yet - that's on you FOLLOW + NOTIFS ON!

NoName

1,051,734 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THE CHART 🚨 This overlay says everything White candles represent the full dotcom cycle of 2000, growth and collapse As you can see, they align perfectly with the AI bubble price action right now And yes, history is about to repeat The reason isn't random In 2000 it was Cisco and Intel Every company rushed to buy chips for the internet revolution Then the buildout slowed, orders collapsed, and the companies that supplied the boom got hit hardest In 2025 it was Nvidia Every company rushed to buy chips for the AI revolution The buildout is slowing now too Different era, same mania, same index, same chart And you already know how the dotcom version ended If you've been following me closely you knew when and why S&P 500 would start correcting Many of my followers also took profit from the GOLD pump The next stock market updates will be the most important ones The reason is simple - we're entering a correction phase Turn on notifications and you'll realize how much valuable info you've been missing by not doing it sooner
0:36

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THE CHART 🚨 This overlay says everything White candles represent the full dotcom cycle of 2000, growth and collapse As you can see, they align perfectly with the AI bubble price action right now And yes, history is about to repeat The reason isn't random In 2000 it was Cisco and Intel Every company rushed to buy chips for the internet revolution Then the buildout slowed, orders collapsed, and the companies that supplied the boom got hit hardest In 2025 it was Nvidia Every company rushed to buy chips for the AI revolution The buildout is slowing now too Different era, same mania, same index, same chart And you already know how the dotcom version ended If you've been following me closely you knew when and why S&P 500 would start correcting Many of my followers also took profit from the GOLD pump The next stock market updates will be the most important ones The reason is simple - we're entering a correction phase Turn on notifications and you'll realize how much valuable info you've been missing by not doing it sooner

NoName

903,952 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING VERY BAD IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW!! The stock market keeps pushing to new all-time highs. Nvidia is leading the charge. But almost nobody is paying attention to the real problem. A huge AI bubble is inflating at incredible speed and about to pop. This has happened before. 2000: Cisco was the "god of the internet" with routers, switches, infrastructure. The stock crashed 90% and never fully recovered. Today: Nvidia is the "god of AI" with chips, data centers, infrastructure. Same role. Same script. But the risk is much bigger. Let me explain why. This time, concentration is extreme. The "Magnificent 7" make up 30% of the S&P 500. If AI falls, the whole index falls. Big Tech CapEx is exploding. $650 billion only in 2026. But where is the ROI? Nobody knows. If Google and Microsoft don't show real profits, they will cut orders. Then Nvidia collapses. Then the whole index follows. Japan, holding trillions in U.S. Treasuries, is about to hike rates. When they sell, global liquidity evaporates. Risk assets get crushed first. This is not 2000. This is 2000 with leverage, concentration, and a liquidity shock loading. For the record, I've called every major turn for the last 10 years, including the $111K top in October. Turn on notifications. When the AI bubble bursts, I'll call it here publicly, like I always do.
0:31

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING VERY BAD IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW!! The stock market keeps pushing to new all-time highs. Nvidia is leading the charge. But almost nobody is paying attention to the real problem. A huge AI bubble is inflating at incredible speed and about to pop. This has happened before. 2000: Cisco was the "god of the internet" with routers, switches, infrastructure. The stock crashed 90% and never fully recovered. Today: Nvidia is the "god of AI" with chips, data centers, infrastructure. Same role. Same script. But the risk is much bigger. Let me explain why. This time, concentration is extreme. The "Magnificent 7" make up 30% of the S&P 500. If AI falls, the whole index falls. Big Tech CapEx is exploding. $650 billion only in 2026. But where is the ROI? Nobody knows. If Google and Microsoft don't show real profits, they will cut orders. Then Nvidia collapses. Then the whole index follows. Japan, holding trillions in U.S. Treasuries, is about to hike rates. When they sell, global liquidity evaporates. Risk assets get crushed first. This is not 2000. This is 2000 with leverage, concentration, and a liquidity shock loading. For the record, I've called every major turn for the last 10 years, including the $111K top in October. Turn on notifications. When the AI bubble bursts, I'll call it here publicly, like I always do.

MARMOT

365,148 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Michael Burry just compared Nvidia to the company that lost 90% of its value in the dot-com crash and took 25 years to recover. "I stand by my analysis. I am not claiming Nvidia is Enron. It is clearly Cisco." Here's the most recent warning from the investor who called the 2008 crash: Michael Burry built his reputation on one trade. He saw the housing market collapse before anyone else and bet against it. "The Big Short" made him famous. Now he's looking at Nvidia. And he says it looks like Cisco in March 2000. That comparison is not a casual insult. Cisco was the most valuable company in the world at the peak of the dot-com bubble. Its valuation crossed $500 billion. Then the bubble burst. The stock fell roughly 90% from its 2000 peak. Its market cap collapsed to about $60 billion by 2002. And it took roughly 25 years for the stock to climb back to where it started. An entire generation of investors waited a quarter century just to break even. That is the company Burry is comparing Nvidia to. Now here is the number that triggered the warning. In Nvidia's fiscal 2026 results, the company disclosed its purchase obligations. These are the commitments Nvidia makes to its suppliers to lock in future manufacturing capacity. A year ago, that figure sat at $16.1 billion. This year it jumped to $95.2 billion. Total supply obligations now sit at roughly $117 billion. Nvidia is committing $117 billion to build capacity for demand that has not arrived yet. Burry's argument is simple. A company does not lock in $117 billion in supplier commitments unless it is betting the demand keeps climbing. If that demand slows even slightly, Nvidia is holding billions in obligations it cannot unwind. And that is exactly what happened to Cisco. Cisco overcommitted to supplier capacity expecting roughly 50% annual growth. Then tech spending slowed. The inventory piled up. The stock cratered. Burry is not calling Nvidia a fraud. He is not saying it is the next Enron. He is saying it could be the market's Cisco. The single stock that becomes the symbol of an AI spending unwind that drags everything down with it. And the dot-com comparison carries weight because of what happened to the broader market. When that bubble burst, the Nasdaq 100 fell 77%. The S&P 500 dropped 49%. It was not just one stock. It was the whole market. Now here is the other side of the argument. Nvidia's supporters say the Cisco comparison is too simple. Because Cisco was riding hype. Nvidia is riding actual revenue. Nvidia reported fiscal 2026 revenue of $215.9 billion, up 65% year over year. Data center revenue alone hit roughly $193.7 billion, up 68%. Record quarterly data center revenue of $62.3 billion in the fourth quarter, up 75%. These are not promises. These are realized sales, booked and collected. The bulls argue that pricing power and margins this strong do not exist inside a pure bubble. In their view, Burry is warning about a future slowdown that has not shown up in a single quarterly report. So the debate splits into two clean halves. The bears say the $117 billion in commitments makes Nvidia dangerously sensitive to any demand slowdown. The bulls say the revenue is real, the growth is accelerating, and the buildout is justified by the orders already on the books. Both sides are looking at the same company. Both sides are looking at the same numbers. They just disagree on what those numbers mean. And there is a second force pulling at this market that has nothing to do with Nvidia's earnings. A wave of mega-IPOs is reportedly coming. SpaceX. OpenAI. Anthropic. Some estimates suggest the market may need to absorb close to $200 billion in fresh equity supply. That creates a quieter question underneath the Burry debate. Even if AI demand stays strong, capital is finite. When the next wave of private giants goes public, money has to come from somewhere. And the easiest place to pull it from is the stock that already tripled. The real test is not whether Burry is right or wrong today. It is whether demand growth, margins, and contract utilization keep matching the $117 billion that Nvidia and its entire ecosystem are committing right now. If the demand keeps climbing, the commitments look like foresight. If it stalls, they look like Cisco. The man who saw the last crash before anyone else just put a name on the risk. A company that was once worth over $500 billion, then lost 90%, then made its investors wait 25 years to get back to even. The numbers say Nvidia is booking record revenue. The same numbers say Nvidia is committing $117 billion to a future nobody can see. One of those facts ages well. The other one is the entire question.
7:21

BREAKING: Michael Burry just compared Nvidia to the company that lost 90% of its value in the dot-com crash and took 25 years to recover. "I stand by my analysis. I am not claiming Nvidia is Enron. It is clearly Cisco." Here's the most recent warning from the investor who called the 2008 crash: Michael Burry built his reputation on one trade. He saw the housing market collapse before anyone else and bet against it. "The Big Short" made him famous. Now he's looking at Nvidia. And he says it looks like Cisco in March 2000. That comparison is not a casual insult. Cisco was the most valuable company in the world at the peak of the dot-com bubble. Its valuation crossed $500 billion. Then the bubble burst. The stock fell roughly 90% from its 2000 peak. Its market cap collapsed to about $60 billion by 2002. And it took roughly 25 years for the stock to climb back to where it started. An entire generation of investors waited a quarter century just to break even. That is the company Burry is comparing Nvidia to. Now here is the number that triggered the warning. In Nvidia's fiscal 2026 results, the company disclosed its purchase obligations. These are the commitments Nvidia makes to its suppliers to lock in future manufacturing capacity. A year ago, that figure sat at $16.1 billion. This year it jumped to $95.2 billion. Total supply obligations now sit at roughly $117 billion. Nvidia is committing $117 billion to build capacity for demand that has not arrived yet. Burry's argument is simple. A company does not lock in $117 billion in supplier commitments unless it is betting the demand keeps climbing. If that demand slows even slightly, Nvidia is holding billions in obligations it cannot unwind. And that is exactly what happened to Cisco. Cisco overcommitted to supplier capacity expecting roughly 50% annual growth. Then tech spending slowed. The inventory piled up. The stock cratered. Burry is not calling Nvidia a fraud. He is not saying it is the next Enron. He is saying it could be the market's Cisco. The single stock that becomes the symbol of an AI spending unwind that drags everything down with it. And the dot-com comparison carries weight because of what happened to the broader market. When that bubble burst, the Nasdaq 100 fell 77%. The S&P 500 dropped 49%. It was not just one stock. It was the whole market. Now here is the other side of the argument. Nvidia's supporters say the Cisco comparison is too simple. Because Cisco was riding hype. Nvidia is riding actual revenue. Nvidia reported fiscal 2026 revenue of $215.9 billion, up 65% year over year. Data center revenue alone hit roughly $193.7 billion, up 68%. Record quarterly data center revenue of $62.3 billion in the fourth quarter, up 75%. These are not promises. These are realized sales, booked and collected. The bulls argue that pricing power and margins this strong do not exist inside a pure bubble. In their view, Burry is warning about a future slowdown that has not shown up in a single quarterly report. So the debate splits into two clean halves. The bears say the $117 billion in commitments makes Nvidia dangerously sensitive to any demand slowdown. The bulls say the revenue is real, the growth is accelerating, and the buildout is justified by the orders already on the books. Both sides are looking at the same company. Both sides are looking at the same numbers. They just disagree on what those numbers mean. And there is a second force pulling at this market that has nothing to do with Nvidia's earnings. A wave of mega-IPOs is reportedly coming. SpaceX. OpenAI. Anthropic. Some estimates suggest the market may need to absorb close to $200 billion in fresh equity supply. That creates a quieter question underneath the Burry debate. Even if AI demand stays strong, capital is finite. When the next wave of private giants goes public, money has to come from somewhere. And the easiest place to pull it from is the stock that already tripled. The real test is not whether Burry is right or wrong today. It is whether demand growth, margins, and contract utilization keep matching the $117 billion that Nvidia and its entire ecosystem are committing right now. If the demand keeps climbing, the commitments look like foresight. If it stalls, they look like Cisco. The man who saw the last crash before anyone else just put a name on the risk. A company that was once worth over $500 billion, then lost 90%, then made its investors wait 25 years to get back to even. The numbers say Nvidia is booking record revenue. The same numbers say Nvidia is committing $117 billion to a future nobody can see. One of those facts ages well. The other one is the entire question.

Insider Trackers

285,273 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This is exactly what I told you would happen. Nvidia just broke a multi-year uptrend. The entire AI bubble is now sitting on this chart. If this is a fakeout, Nvidia survives. If it isn’t, the whole market follows. 2000 was Cisco. 2026 is Nvidia. And the chart is starting to say the same thing. When one stock becomes the market, one break becomes a market problem. Remember, I’ve predicted all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the exact Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.
0:21

This is exactly what I told you would happen. Nvidia just broke a multi-year uptrend. The entire AI bubble is now sitting on this chart. If this is a fakeout, Nvidia survives. If it isn’t, the whole market follows. 2000 was Cisco. 2026 is Nvidia. And the chart is starting to say the same thing. When one stock becomes the market, one break becomes a market problem. Remember, I’ve predicted all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the exact Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 three years ago and the top at $126,000 in October. If you missed those calls, don’t worry. I’ll call the next one too. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

174,884 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$SPCX LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE $NVDA BEFORE THE 50X Most people look at this chart and see a failed IPO That's exactly what they said about Nvidia in 1999 Nvidia exploded on hype, flushed hard, and then went silent Retail walked away But Institutions spent months loading the zone nobody was watching - then Nvidia ran 50x Now look at the left chart SpaceX just gave you the IPO hype, the flush, and the retail obituaries - exactly the sequence Nvidia ran before its rally And now we entered in that red box In the quiet zone where retail had already given up and institutions were loading in silence Are you ready? Dont forget: I posted SpaceX IPO trap before Day 3 even peaked The structure was clear - same playbook as Tesla 2010, same result incoming What comes next for this stock is the most important move to watch this week Follow now - you'll realize how much you've been missing by not doing it sooner
0:38

$SPCX LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE $NVDA BEFORE THE 50X Most people look at this chart and see a failed IPO That's exactly what they said about Nvidia in 1999 Nvidia exploded on hype, flushed hard, and then went silent Retail walked away But Institutions spent months loading the zone nobody was watching - then Nvidia ran 50x Now look at the left chart SpaceX just gave you the IPO hype, the flush, and the retail obituaries - exactly the sequence Nvidia ran before its rally And now we entered in that red box In the quiet zone where retail had already given up and institutions were loading in silence Are you ready? Dont forget: I posted SpaceX IPO trap before Day 3 even peaked The structure was clear - same playbook as Tesla 2010, same result incoming What comes next for this stock is the most important move to watch this week Follow now - you'll realize how much you've been missing by not doing it sooner

bee🐝

282,707 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

THIS BUBBLE IS WORSE THAN 2000 If you have money in the stock market, read this carefully. The market is climbing while liquidity gets pulled out underneath it. Now look at valuations. Shiller CAPE: 42.05. The only time it was higher was 1999, right before the dot-com crash. Buffett Indicator: 229.9%. In 2000, it was 146%. That means today’s market is 1.6x higher than the dot-com peak by that metric. Buffett is sitting on $325B in cash and selling stocks. He is not guessing. He is reading the same math. Now concentration. Top 10 stocks control 41% of the S&P 500. They generate only 32% of profits. In 2000, top concentration was 23%. This is not a diversified index anymore. It is a crowded bet on a handful of companies, and most of them are tied to the same AI story. Now add leverage. Margin debt hit $1.28T. That is 4.1% of GDP. In 2000, it was 2.7%. Investors are borrowing more to buy stocks than they did at the dot-com peak. And the reversal may have already started. Margin debt peaked in January 2026 and dropped 4.5% in two months. The S&P dropped 5.9% in the same window. Last time margin debt rolled before the market? 2000. 2007. Every time, the market followed. Now look at AI. In 2000, telecom companies spent billions building fiber for “the internet future.” Capex hit 4.5% of GDP. Today, hyperscalers are spending on data centers for “the AI future.” Tech capex is 4.4% of GDP. Almost the same number. Back then, Lucent and Nortel helped finance customers who bought their equipment. Today, Nvidia invests in companies that buy Nvidia chips. Same loop. Different label. In 2000, the bubble was internet infrastructure. In 2026, it is AI infrastructure. The companies are bigger now. The spending is bigger. The index concentration is worse. The leverage is higher. And the market is priced like the returns are already guaranteed. That is the danger. If one major earnings report shows AI spending is not paying off, the repricing starts. And with 41% of the index sitting in the same trade, there is nowhere clean to hide. That’s why I’m watching this situation very closely right now. When the next move becomes clear, I’ll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.
0:38

THIS BUBBLE IS WORSE THAN 2000 If you have money in the stock market, read this carefully. The market is climbing while liquidity gets pulled out underneath it. Now look at valuations. Shiller CAPE: 42.05. The only time it was higher was 1999, right before the dot-com crash. Buffett Indicator: 229.9%. In 2000, it was 146%. That means today’s market is 1.6x higher than the dot-com peak by that metric. Buffett is sitting on $325B in cash and selling stocks. He is not guessing. He is reading the same math. Now concentration. Top 10 stocks control 41% of the S&P 500. They generate only 32% of profits. In 2000, top concentration was 23%. This is not a diversified index anymore. It is a crowded bet on a handful of companies, and most of them are tied to the same AI story. Now add leverage. Margin debt hit $1.28T. That is 4.1% of GDP. In 2000, it was 2.7%. Investors are borrowing more to buy stocks than they did at the dot-com peak. And the reversal may have already started. Margin debt peaked in January 2026 and dropped 4.5% in two months. The S&P dropped 5.9% in the same window. Last time margin debt rolled before the market? 2000. 2007. Every time, the market followed. Now look at AI. In 2000, telecom companies spent billions building fiber for “the internet future.” Capex hit 4.5% of GDP. Today, hyperscalers are spending on data centers for “the AI future.” Tech capex is 4.4% of GDP. Almost the same number. Back then, Lucent and Nortel helped finance customers who bought their equipment. Today, Nvidia invests in companies that buy Nvidia chips. Same loop. Different label. In 2000, the bubble was internet infrastructure. In 2026, it is AI infrastructure. The companies are bigger now. The spending is bigger. The index concentration is worse. The leverage is higher. And the market is priced like the returns are already guaranteed. That is the danger. If one major earnings report shows AI spending is not paying off, the repricing starts. And with 41% of the index sitting in the same trade, there is nowhere clean to hide. That’s why I’m watching this situation very closely right now. When the next move becomes clear, I’ll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

Nonzee

83,631 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THIS CHART 🚨 White candles are the dot-com bubble The colored candles are right now Do you see where I'm going with this? We're hanging by a thread, on the verge of collapse, but some people still believe in endless growth In 2000 the narrative was "the internet changes everything" In 2026 the narrative is "AI changes everything" Both times the market priced in decades of growth in months Both times the green support line held - until it didn't We're sitting at the peak of the right side right now Do you believe this overlay is a coincidence? I don't Just a reminder that I perfectly predicted the moves on S&P 500 and GOLD Turn on notifications so you don't miss future updates
0:30

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THIS CHART 🚨 White candles are the dot-com bubble The colored candles are right now Do you see where I'm going with this? We're hanging by a thread, on the verge of collapse, but some people still believe in endless growth In 2000 the narrative was "the internet changes everything" In 2026 the narrative is "AI changes everything" Both times the market priced in decades of growth in months Both times the green support line held - until it didn't We're sitting at the peak of the right side right now Do you believe this overlay is a coincidence? I don't Just a reminder that I perfectly predicted the moves on S&P 500 and GOLD Turn on notifications so you don't miss future updates

NoName

41,004 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 LOOK AT THE CHART Everyone thinks the bottom is in But real bottoms come with massive volume Back in 2022-2023 it was obvious But right now we’re not even close yet Turn notifs on before I call the bottom
0:41

🚨 LOOK AT THE CHART Everyone thinks the bottom is in But real bottoms come with massive volume Back in 2022-2023 it was obvious But right now we’re not even close yet Turn notifs on before I call the bottom

NoName

34,619 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THIS CHART 🚨 White candles - the dot-com semiconductor bubble (2000) Colored candles - the AI semiconductor bubble (2026) I genuinely don't know how to make this clearer The reason this keeps happening isn't random - it's a new technology cycle arrives In 2000, every company on the planet had one goal - get online as fast as possible To do that, they needed infrastructure. Routers, servers, fiber optic cables And the companies that made all of it - Cisco and Intel - couldn't produce fast enough Demand felt infinite. Valuations went vertical. Everyone assumed this growth would last forever But at some point, the internet was built. The cables were laid. The servers were installed New orders stopped coming in. The companies sitting on mountains of unsold inventory started collapsing And the index that tracked all of them - fell over 80% In 2025, the same story - different technology Every company on the planet had one goal - integrate AI as fast as possible To do that, they needed chips. Nvidia couldn't produce fast enough Demand felt infinite. Valuations went vertical. Everyone assumed this growth would last forever And now - it's starting The first major drop just happened. The orders are slowing. The data centers are built This is how the dot-com version began too You already know how it ended last time Don't fall for it again If you don't have time to keep up with everything - follow me I'll keep you updated on the most important events
0:26

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THIS CHART 🚨 White candles - the dot-com semiconductor bubble (2000) Colored candles - the AI semiconductor bubble (2026) I genuinely don't know how to make this clearer The reason this keeps happening isn't random - it's a new technology cycle arrives In 2000, every company on the planet had one goal - get online as fast as possible To do that, they needed infrastructure. Routers, servers, fiber optic cables And the companies that made all of it - Cisco and Intel - couldn't produce fast enough Demand felt infinite. Valuations went vertical. Everyone assumed this growth would last forever But at some point, the internet was built. The cables were laid. The servers were installed New orders stopped coming in. The companies sitting on mountains of unsold inventory started collapsing And the index that tracked all of them - fell over 80% In 2025, the same story - different technology Every company on the planet had one goal - integrate AI as fast as possible To do that, they needed chips. Nvidia couldn't produce fast enough Demand felt infinite. Valuations went vertical. Everyone assumed this growth would last forever And now - it's starting The first major drop just happened. The orders are slowing. The data centers are built This is how the dot-com version began too You already know how it ended last time Don't fall for it again If you don't have time to keep up with everything - follow me I'll keep you updated on the most important events

NoName

21,590 просмотров • 14 дней назад

AI BUBBLE IS BIGGER THAN DOTCOM. Shiller CAPE: 42.32. Last seen in 1999. Buffett Indicator: 229.9% vs 146% in 2000. 1.6x worse. Top 10 stocks: 41% of S&P vs 23% in 2000. Margin debt: $1.28T = 4.1% GDP vs 2.7% in 2000. Margin debt peaked Jan 2026 and dropped 4.5% in two months. S&P dropped 5.9% in the same window. Last time margin debt rolled over before the market? 2000. 2007. In 2000, Lucent helped finance customers who bought Lucent equipment. In 2026, Nvidia invests in companies that buy Nvidia chips. Same loop. Different label. Buffett is sitting on $325B in cash and selling stocks. He is reading the same math. One bad earnings report on AI spending and the repricing starts. With 41% of the index in the same trade, there is nowhere clean to hide. When the next move becomes clear, I'll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.
0:29

AI BUBBLE IS BIGGER THAN DOTCOM. Shiller CAPE: 42.32. Last seen in 1999. Buffett Indicator: 229.9% vs 146% in 2000. 1.6x worse. Top 10 stocks: 41% of S&P vs 23% in 2000. Margin debt: $1.28T = 4.1% GDP vs 2.7% in 2000. Margin debt peaked Jan 2026 and dropped 4.5% in two months. S&P dropped 5.9% in the same window. Last time margin debt rolled over before the market? 2000. 2007. In 2000, Lucent helped finance customers who bought Lucent equipment. In 2026, Nvidia invests in companies that buy Nvidia chips. Same loop. Different label. Buffett is sitting on $325B in cash and selling stocks. He is reading the same math. One bad earnings report on AI spending and the repricing starts. With 41% of the index in the same trade, there is nowhere clean to hide. When the next move becomes clear, I'll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.

Nonzee

299,479 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 WARNING: SPACEX IS FOLLOWING NVIDIA PATTERN IN 1999!! Same setup. Different decade. Nvidia IPO'd on hype, ran hard, then flushed. Retail panicked and walked away calling it a failed trade. Forums were full of people explaining why it was worthless. Then institutions loaded the quiet zone nobody was watching. Then Nvidia ran 50x. SpaceX is running the identical sequence right now. Peak, flush, retail obituaries, accumulation, real move. The people selling at $147 are the same people who sold Nvidia at $4 and spent the next decade watching from the sidelines. This is not the end of SpaceX. This is the part of the chart that separates the people who make generational money From the people who need the move to be obvious before they act. Day 1 buyers who chased thehype at $227 are getting punished. That's how it works, that's how it has always worked. The patient buyer waits for the fear to peak, loads in the silence. And doesn't need validation from the crowd because the chart already told the story. Fear is peaking right now. I will keep you updated on everything here When I rotate money, I will post my moves here so my followers can save their money Many will regret not following me earlier...
1:06

🚨 WARNING: SPACEX IS FOLLOWING NVIDIA PATTERN IN 1999!! Same setup. Different decade. Nvidia IPO'd on hype, ran hard, then flushed. Retail panicked and walked away calling it a failed trade. Forums were full of people explaining why it was worthless. Then institutions loaded the quiet zone nobody was watching. Then Nvidia ran 50x. SpaceX is running the identical sequence right now. Peak, flush, retail obituaries, accumulation, real move. The people selling at $147 are the same people who sold Nvidia at $4 and spent the next decade watching from the sidelines. This is not the end of SpaceX. This is the part of the chart that separates the people who make generational money From the people who need the move to be obvious before they act. Day 1 buyers who chased thehype at $227 are getting punished. That's how it works, that's how it has always worked. The patient buyer waits for the fear to peak, loads in the silence. And doesn't need validation from the crowd because the chart already told the story. Fear is peaking right now. I will keep you updated on everything here When I rotate money, I will post my moves here so my followers can save their money Many will regret not following me earlier...

ᴛʀᴀᴄᴇʀ

80,811 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 S&P 500 VOLUME IS DISGUSTING 🚨 The price remains high - but nobody's really buying it Look at the left side of this chart - that's exactly what happened in early 2025 Quiet rally with no real volume. Then volume returned, triggering a major crash For now the right side is printing the same sequence - and we're sitting right where volume is starting to pick up again This is just a theory, not a fact, but you should still be prepared for it NOTIFS ON!
0:59

🚨 S&P 500 VOLUME IS DISGUSTING 🚨 The price remains high - but nobody's really buying it Look at the left side of this chart - that's exactly what happened in early 2025 Quiet rally with no real volume. Then volume returned, triggering a major crash For now the right side is printing the same sequence - and we're sitting right where volume is starting to pick up again This is just a theory, not a fact, but you should still be prepared for it NOTIFS ON!

NoName

541,826 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

At 23 years old Gavin Baker was a rookie Fidelity analyst handed a chip company nobody wanted to cover the company was Nvidia. the year was 2000 Fidelity owned 15% of it - so this kid had Jensen Huang on the phone one to two hours every single week he held that stock for 25 years. never rotated out. never blinked then he left, built his own fund, and just bought call options on 3.5 million Nvidia shares while everyone else screamed bubble "whenever there is something that might slow it down, everything accelerates" Google's TPUs vs Nvidia's GPUs. the Blackwell delay that nearly stalled all of AI. the real economics nobody explains bookmark and watch it today ↓
1:06:13

At 23 years old Gavin Baker was a rookie Fidelity analyst handed a chip company nobody wanted to cover the company was Nvidia. the year was 2000 Fidelity owned 15% of it - so this kid had Jensen Huang on the phone one to two hours every single week he held that stock for 25 years. never rotated out. never blinked then he left, built his own fund, and just bought call options on 3.5 million Nvidia shares while everyone else screamed bubble "whenever there is something that might slow it down, everything accelerates" Google's TPUs vs Nvidia's GPUs. the Blackwell delay that nearly stalled all of AI. the real economics nobody explains bookmark and watch it today ↓

Loofy

85,652 просмотров • 23 дней назад