Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

someone trained an AI for +2,000 hours using RL to see if it can beat human world record in Trackmania. the interesting part was that he still had to take inspiration from the top player techniques, then FORCE the AI to learn them. finally, AI was able to beat... show more

ℏεsam

85,215 subscribers

1,853,181 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Gaming Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

OpenAI just released a new model to distinguish between AI/human written text to protect against ChatGPT. The classifier was trained on a pair of AI/human written dataset. However.. I was easily able to trick it by using GPT3 to rewrite the text. Demo:

OpenAI just released a new model to distinguish between AI/human written text to protect against ChatGPT. The classifier was trained on a pair of AI/human written dataset. However.. I was easily able to trick it by using GPT3 to rewrite the text. Demo:

Lior Alexander

195,429 views • 3 years ago

In 2026, multi-player AI will eat single-player AI. Right now, most AI tools are built for one human + one model in a private workspace. ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude. Incredibly powerful, but currently optimized for individuals. The impact is massive: drafts, code, specs, campaigns, workflows. But almost none of it is shared, aligned, or contextualized across a team. We've seen this movie before. Cloud 1.0 was just "the same software, but online". The real breakthrough was collaboration. Google Docs beat Word. Figma beat Sketch. Notion beat Evernote. Every single-player tool lost to its multi-player counterpart. AI is about to go through the same transformation. AI 1.0 gave individuals superpowers. AI 2.0 will give teams superpowers. And just like cloud, single-player tools will go multi-player or get replaced. If you're building here, I'd love to talk.

In 2026, multi-player AI will eat single-player AI. Right now, most AI tools are built for one human + one model in a private workspace. ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude. Incredibly powerful, but currently optimized for individuals. The impact is massive: drafts, code, specs, campaigns, workflows. But almost none of it is shared, aligned, or contextualized across a team. We've seen this movie before. Cloud 1.0 was just "the same software, but online". The real breakthrough was collaboration. Google Docs beat Word. Figma beat Sketch. Notion beat Evernote. Every single-player tool lost to its multi-player counterpart. AI is about to go through the same transformation. AI 1.0 gave individuals superpowers. AI 2.0 will give teams superpowers. And just like cloud, single-player tools will go multi-player or get replaced. If you're building here, I'd love to talk.

Fareed Mosavat

55,384 views • 8 months ago

BREAKING: MICROSOFT JUST ANNOUNCED TO BAN ITS OWN ENGINEERS FROM USING AI DUE TO THE COST OF USING IT. VP OF NVIDIA SAID, “THE COST OF AI FOR MY TEAM WAS MORE THAN HUMANS” “AI CAN COST MORE THAN HUMAN WORKERS NOW”

BREAKING: MICROSOFT JUST ANNOUNCED TO BAN ITS OWN ENGINEERS FROM USING AI DUE TO THE COST OF USING IT. VP OF NVIDIA SAID, “THE COST OF AI FOR MY TEAM WAS MORE THAN HUMANS” “AI CAN COST MORE THAN HUMAN WORKERS NOW”

Vivek Sen

17,500,452 views • 3 months ago

The original WoW class designer just revealed the secret behind PvP in World of Warcraft. FORCED randomness..it perfectly explains why 2004 WoW had so much RNG, and the reason behind it is fascinating According to a new interview from Blizzard class designer Kevin Jordan, being able to resist a spell or miss an attack was a key part of player versus player design. Kevin jordans theory was that making the entire outcome skill only was a mistake, because if the better player wins over a long enough time frame, then only the better players will want to play. Nobody wants to keep playing a game they lose every time. Do you agree with kevin jordans take about randomness in player versus player? Is pvp more fun if an average player can sometimes beat the best players? Or should it be pure skill based.

The original WoW class designer just revealed the secret behind PvP in World of Warcraft. FORCED randomness..it perfectly explains why 2004 WoW had so much RNG, and the reason behind it is fascinating According to a new interview from Blizzard class designer Kevin Jordan, being able to resist a spell or miss an attack was a key part of player versus player design. Kevin jordans theory was that making the entire outcome skill only was a mistake, because if the better player wins over a long enough time frame, then only the better players will want to play. Nobody wants to keep playing a game they lose every time. Do you agree with kevin jordans take about randomness in player versus player? Is pvp more fun if an average player can sometimes beat the best players? Or should it be pure skill based.

NoHitJerome

47,744 views • 4 months ago

“AI will not take your job. Someone using AI will take your job.”⁣ ⁣ That’s the mindset workers should have as AI changes the workplace: don’t try to outrun the technology. Learn how to use it.⁣ ⁣

“AI will not take your job. Someone using AI will take your job.”⁣ ⁣ That’s the mindset workers should have as AI changes the workplace: don’t try to outrun the technology. Learn how to use it.⁣ ⁣

Justin Wolfers

17,527 views • 25 days ago

Clix admits to Jynxzi that Peterbot is the better player but says he still believes he’s a top 15 player in the world. 👀

Clix admits to Jynxzi that Peterbot is the better player but says he still believes he’s a top 15 player in the world. 👀

Stack

97,879 views • 2 months ago

Using AI to imagine what the World Cup would look like if it was hosted in Iran

Using AI to imagine what the World Cup would look like if it was hosted in Iran

Alireza Talakoubnejad

17,382 views • 2 months ago

Update: The new features rollout this week A Google spokesperson responded to the TechCrunch article: “We’re continuing to display blue links on the search results page in addition to AI responses. If someone chooses to ask a follow-up from an AI Overview, or selects the AI Mode button in the Search box, then that takes them to AI Mode. It doesn’t happen automatically – people have to choose to navigate to AI Mode" (via philip lewis)

Update: The new features rollout this week A Google spokesperson responded to the TechCrunch article: “We’re continuing to display blue links on the search results page in addition to AI responses. If someone chooses to ask a follow-up from an AI Overview, or selects the AI Mode button in the Search box, then that takes them to AI Mode. It doesn’t happen automatically – people have to choose to navigate to AI Mode" (via philip lewis)

Culture Crave 🍿

160,387 views • 3 months ago

Blake Lemoine was famously fired from Google for saying that AI has emotions. During our interview, he wanted to set the record straight: the AI sentience part was a big headline. But his more important message was that AI is going to be a powerful tool, too dangerous to leave in the hands of a small group of people.

Blake Lemoine was famously fired from Google for saying that AI has emotions. During our interview, he wanted to set the record straight: the AI sentience part was a big headline. But his more important message was that AI is going to be a powerful tool, too dangerous to leave in the hands of a small group of people.

Sophia

19,842 views • 4 months ago

Remember when everyone said AI was going to completely replace radiologists? Dario Amodei just broke down exactly why that hasn't happened yet and what it means for the future of your career. Instead of wiping out the job, AI just ate the highly technical part (reading the scans), forcing humans to pivot entirely to the "human touch" (patient care). Amodei believes we need to adapt to AI step-by-step as it evolves. However, he didn't sugarcoat the endgame: he admitted it is highly likely that AI will eventually beat us at everything, including physical robotics.

Remember when everyone said AI was going to completely replace radiologists? Dario Amodei just broke down exactly why that hasn't happened yet and what it means for the future of your career. Instead of wiping out the job, AI just ate the highly technical part (reading the scans), forcing humans to pivot entirely to the "human touch" (patient care). Amodei believes we need to adapt to AI step-by-step as it evolves. However, he didn't sugarcoat the endgame: he admitted it is highly likely that AI will eventually beat us at everything, including physical robotics.

Wes Roth

70,088 views • 6 months ago

Using computer vision techniques, the robot analyzed each frame of video and was able to identify the different objects and features. In the future, robots will be able to learn human behaviors just by watching videos.

Using computer vision techniques, the robot analyzed each frame of video and was able to identify the different objects and features. In the future, robots will be able to learn human behaviors just by watching videos.

Aakash Gupta

55,257 views • 3 years ago

Nick Wright says he’s got Kobe Bryant as the 8th greatest player ever, and he was never the best player in the world: “I know people get mad at that take, but here’s the problem and the reason Kobe was never the best player in the world. Because once Kobe got great, call it 99, he wasn’t great yet, but I’ll give him 99 once you started seeing flashes. From 99 until 2002, Shaquille O’Neal was the best player in the world. And then from 2003 until 2007, Tim Duncan was the best player in the world. You know how I know Tim Duncan was the best player in the world at that time? Because he won three championships in five years. He won two MVPs. He was the best player. He was the best player until that 48 special by LeBron in 2007. LeBron was the best player in the world from that moment until 2018. So it was Shaq, it was Duncan, it was then Bron. At no point was Kobe the best player in the world.” (Via What’s Wright? with Nick Wright)

Nick Wright says he’s got Kobe Bryant as the 8th greatest player ever, and he was never the best player in the world: “I know people get mad at that take, but here’s the problem and the reason Kobe was never the best player in the world. Because once Kobe got great, call it 99, he wasn’t great yet, but I’ll give him 99 once you started seeing flashes. From 99 until 2002, Shaquille O’Neal was the best player in the world. And then from 2003 until 2007, Tim Duncan was the best player in the world. You know how I know Tim Duncan was the best player in the world at that time? Because he won three championships in five years. He won two MVPs. He was the best player. He was the best player until that 48 special by LeBron in 2007. LeBron was the best player in the world from that moment until 2018. So it was Shaq, it was Duncan, it was then Bron. At no point was Kobe the best player in the world.” (Via What’s Wright? with Nick Wright)

NBA Courtside

1,462,864 views • 3 months ago

AI isn’t a buzzword it’s the new backbone of business. The rules have changed. Today, the first question investors ask isn’t if you use AI, it’s how much of your business runs on it. From underwriting to inventory, agriculture to logistics, AI is doing in seconds what used to take weeks. And the market knows it. Ignore these tools, and someone else will beat you on cost, speed, and scale.

AI isn’t a buzzword it’s the new backbone of business. The rules have changed. Today, the first question investors ask isn’t if you use AI, it’s how much of your business runs on it. From underwriting to inventory, agriculture to logistics, AI is doing in seconds what used to take weeks. And the market knows it. Ignore these tools, and someone else will beat you on cost, speed, and scale.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

32,774 views • 6 months ago

"The legacy I want to leave behind as a competitive player is a player that was always happy and made it to the top." Player Profile | BLAKE

Fortnite Competitive

86,684 views • 3 years ago

AI is great at generating answers. But some tasks still need human judgment. I tried Tendem AI inside ChatGPT: • Described a research task • Reviewed the price in chat • Approved it • A vetted human expert completed the work • Results came back in the same conversation The interesting part wasn't the output. It was never having to leave the chat. AI handled the routing. A HUMAN handled the work. Get $50 to start:

AI is great at generating answers. But some tasks still need human judgment. I tried Tendem AI inside ChatGPT: • Described a research task • Reviewed the price in chat • Approved it • A vetted human expert completed the work • Results came back in the same conversation The interesting part wasn't the output. It was never having to leave the chat. AI handled the routing. A HUMAN handled the work. Get $50 to start:

Vipin Gautam (Viipin I Gautam)

64,685 views • 2 months ago

David Friedberg: “Why don't we let AI models get bar certified and get medically certified?” “So if the AI models, it turns out, are actually proving to be more accurate, more thoughtful, more responsive, more reasonable, whatever metric we're using, and they pass the same criteria as one would need to pass to qualify for the bar, or to qualify for a doctor certificate, why don't we do that for the AI?” “If that then happens, then the same privilege accrues to the AI as it does to the individual human that does it.” “And now, if you extrapolate from where that takes us, if we're suddenly giving AI the same sort of privileged rights that we give to privileged humans, where's that gonna take us ultimately with respect to the overall rights for AI?”

David Friedberg: “Why don't we let AI models get bar certified and get medically certified?” “So if the AI models, it turns out, are actually proving to be more accurate, more thoughtful, more responsive, more reasonable, whatever metric we're using, and they pass the same criteria as one would need to pass to qualify for the bar, or to qualify for a doctor certificate, why don't we do that for the AI?” “If that then happens, then the same privilege accrues to the AI as it does to the individual human that does it.” “And now, if you extrapolate from where that takes us, if we're suddenly giving AI the same sort of privileged rights that we give to privileged humans, where's that gonna take us ultimately with respect to the overall rights for AI?”

The All-In Podcast

77,038 views • 1 year ago