Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Something interesting is going to be released soon... ✨ Kitt The Inner Circle Trader "If I had to trade only one model for the rest of my life, considering everything I've publicly disclosed, my choice would be either the second stage of re-distribution in an MMSM or the second... stage of re-accumulation in an MMBM. With either of these, I believe I could consistently generate substantial profits without the need to explore alternative strategies. These models rely on specific components of both the buy and sell sides of the market curve, which are directly interconnected. This isn't a matter of identifying support and resistance levels; it's about understanding the logic of order flow. In the case of the market maker sell model, I focus on identifying a pool of liquidity beneath the initial consolidation. When I spot this sellside opportunity, I patiently await a reversal. This reversal should lead to a drop of at least 50% from the smart money's reversal point down to the sellside liquidity. If it achieves this, and then begins to rally once more, I'll look to correlate it with the other side of the curve, where the market previously rallied before reversing. This will provide me with an array that initially signaled a bullish trend but now acts as a reversal indicator. This marks the second stage of distribution or redistribution, and it usually happens swiftly, pushing prices towards the sellside. In essence, I'm waiting for a unicorn setup, where all the pieces align perfectly, and I have everything in my favor. I'll risk 5% on such a trade. This approach involves re-accumulation, where the sellside drops down to 50%, and then I match it with another array to capture the reversal. Now, picture a market maker model involving a consolidation phase where relative equal lows are formed, followed by an upward rally, possibly forming a consolidation that resembles a bull flag pattern. Subsequently, it rallies out of that consolidation. Sometimes, it may create a second stage of re-accumulation as it trades towards a premium array level—a level I consider a liquidity draw. If I'm feeling bullish, I'd aim for that level. I don't necessarily need to be there at the exact moment; I might spot the opportunity later and act accordingly. If it's reacting off of a level, that should offer sellside. So, you know where sellside delivery. The market should drop down. So, I'm anticipating price reacting and reversing at the smart money reversal once it starts to break down. If it goes back up a little bit, that's the smart money reversal. Low risk sell is the next stage and then they'll drop. When we reach the low-risk sell, it's important that the drop reaches at least 50% of the total range from the smart money reversal to the sellside I'm targeting. As long as it accomplishes this, I have confidence that the subsequent rally will reach a premium array on the left side of the curve before the market makes its high and reverses. Why would it do that? Because it's part of a larger continuation. So when and how would I determine when it's going to fail ,that first leg of re-distribution on the sell side, if it doesn't pierce 50% of that range from the smart money reversal down to the sell side liquidity. If it doesn't do that, then it's not going to go down there. It's going to be a continuation of reverse and go the other way." #ict #ICTshow more

LumiTraders

57,176 subscribers

386,998 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Образование Финансы

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля TraderHch

TraderHch2 лет назад

@ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT if @I_Am_The_ICT ever approves any protege you will be one of the 10 @LumiTraders , if not the one. you have an unique way of summarise his teachings and better presentation of charts and analysis. glad to be a follower

Фото профиля LumiTraders

LumiTraders2 лет назад

@hchfx83 @ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT 🙏🙏🙏

Фото профиля Random Mick

Random Mick2 лет назад

@ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT Wait until you backtest the 2nd leg and sync it with specific times of Day.

Фото профиля Wolf Tribe Trading

Wolf Tribe Trading2 лет назад

@ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT Beautifully summarized as always. I can’t wait for you put this into one of your fantastic notations.

Фото профиля Elgordo84

Elgordo842 лет назад

@ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT I don’t think people understand what he just said . This is huge can’t wait to see and hear this . I been training my eyes on this model On a HTF . @I_Am_The_ICT

Фото профиля Sparrow

Sparrow2 лет назад

@ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT Started a new series recently, hope people find value from this..

Фото профиля Maz__King

Maz__King2 лет назад

@ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT @Ali_Khan_ICT as teached thank you

Фото профиля LumiTraders

LumiTraders2 лет назад

@JF_Rouette @ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT @Ali_Khan_ICT Don’t forget about @theMMXMtrader

Фото профиля D.J.

D.J.2 лет назад

@ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT This is not the 1st time he has said this folks

Фото профиля MoneyHouse

MoneyHouse2 лет назад

@ICT_Concepts @I_Am_The_ICT I heard him say this on his core content videos multiple times. Also in one of the space, one setup for life

Похожие видео

This is how I trade reversals! Ok, as promised. Here is a screen recording that I did on $PLTR today. I've compressed 4.5 hours into 20 minutes. This is a 5 minute timeframe chart and this is how I go about mapping out price levels in real time for reversal day trades. Each level is a point of significance from either earlier in the day or a level I perceive as a psychological level for the market. Lets walk through the trade - $PLTR gapped down on a negative catalyst opening near $103. My plan was to watch how $100 level held earlier in the morning knowing this level would be loaded to the hilt with stops from every eager trader chasing it from $120 and higher. The $100 level was also the level where the PEG held about 2 weeks ago on the daily time. Important. $100 flushed out giving a reactionary low around $96. This was the first scalp trade area. A much quicker type of trade. That Idea would have been a scalp from $97 into $100. This is what sets up the reversal trade for the rest of the day though. You have an established low to calculate risk from this point. The stock bounced from the $97 into $101.5x - Perfect. $101.5x is now your second level of importance. (intra-day resistance) I started the recording about 30 minutes after the $101.5x high when the stock started to retest $98 level. This level was the stocks first chance to make a higher low on the day. Recording starts ---- This $98 higher low area caught my eye because it was the first time since the $124 sell off on the previous day and the first time on the current day where it was TRYING TO PIVOT OFF THE DOWNTREND! (11:05 AM EST) As soon as $98 began to hold and the 5 minute downtrend line started to be tested for a trend reversal, this was the signal to get long on the 5 minute higher low of the day. 3% risk was enough to adequately cover this attempt placing the stop below the Low Of Day. The stock began to reverse off that level, approaching $101.5x to confirm the higher low attempt (11:55 AM EST) . I mapped $103.03 as a spot to reduce partial risk from $98 (Sell partial). This level basically hit the penny and reversed perfectly! From there it traded back through $101.5x. I mapped $100 as being an intra-day psychological level figuring if we failed back though the trade was probably done. (12:15 PM EST) $100 managed to hold and the reversal trend continued. $103 was back on deck. (1:30 PM EST) I mapped $105 as a new area of interest through $103. $105 was important because this was the 5 minute opening range close from earlier in the day. This level again hit to the penny and reversed. Another area to scale a little risk back from the entry. You're now +6%++ from $98. $PLTR pulled back from $105.0x and managed to hold above $103 (important level from earlier) From there the next levels of interest were the High of Day HOD ($106.22) and above that the previous day low just above the $108 level. This is how I trade reversals! These same sort of techniques can be used with a setup I learned in Traderstewie private group. The avalanche trade setup. Which is slightly more dramatic and aggressive then what I'm showing here but these exact same techniques work. Enjoy

This is how I trade reversals! Ok, as promised. Here is a screen recording that I did on $PLTR today. I've compressed 4.5 hours into 20 minutes. This is a 5 minute timeframe chart and this is how I go about mapping out price levels in real time for reversal day trades. Each level is a point of significance from either earlier in the day or a level I perceive as a psychological level for the market. Lets walk through the trade - $PLTR gapped down on a negative catalyst opening near $103. My plan was to watch how $100 level held earlier in the morning knowing this level would be loaded to the hilt with stops from every eager trader chasing it from $120 and higher. The $100 level was also the level where the PEG held about 2 weeks ago on the daily time. Important. $100 flushed out giving a reactionary low around $96. This was the first scalp trade area. A much quicker type of trade. That Idea would have been a scalp from $97 into $100. This is what sets up the reversal trade for the rest of the day though. You have an established low to calculate risk from this point. The stock bounced from the $97 into $101.5x - Perfect. $101.5x is now your second level of importance. (intra-day resistance) I started the recording about 30 minutes after the $101.5x high when the stock started to retest $98 level. This level was the stocks first chance to make a higher low on the day. Recording starts ---- This $98 higher low area caught my eye because it was the first time since the $124 sell off on the previous day and the first time on the current day where it was TRYING TO PIVOT OFF THE DOWNTREND! (11:05 AM EST) As soon as $98 began to hold and the 5 minute downtrend line started to be tested for a trend reversal, this was the signal to get long on the 5 minute higher low of the day. 3% risk was enough to adequately cover this attempt placing the stop below the Low Of Day. The stock began to reverse off that level, approaching $101.5x to confirm the higher low attempt (11:55 AM EST) . I mapped $103.03 as a spot to reduce partial risk from $98 (Sell partial). This level basically hit the penny and reversed perfectly! From there it traded back through $101.5x. I mapped $100 as being an intra-day psychological level figuring if we failed back though the trade was probably done. (12:15 PM EST) $100 managed to hold and the reversal trend continued. $103 was back on deck. (1:30 PM EST) I mapped $105 as a new area of interest through $103. $105 was important because this was the 5 minute opening range close from earlier in the day. This level again hit to the penny and reversed. Another area to scale a little risk back from the entry. You're now +6%++ from $98. $PLTR pulled back from $105.0x and managed to hold above $103 (important level from earlier) From there the next levels of interest were the High of Day HOD ($106.22) and above that the previous day low just above the $108 level. This is how I trade reversals! These same sort of techniques can be used with a setup I learned in Traderstewie private group. The avalanche trade setup. Which is slightly more dramatic and aggressive then what I'm showing here but these exact same techniques work. Enjoy

Trader Z

36,177 просмотров • 1 год назад

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,619,350 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Chamath: Fraud at this scale will end the American Empire if nothing is done “It is a crucible moment for American society.” “If nothing happens and we deem this kind of theft acceptable, it is the beginning of the end of the American Empire.” “It's just a level of disrespect and lack of care for this country.” “I will be waiting and observing how important it is to root this out, that's number one.” “The second, which is more tactical political calculus, this is an enormous opportunity for the Republican Party if they take this and run with this.” “Is there waste, fraud and abuse in every state? Absolutely. I don't think this is endemically a Democratic problem, but the scale of it is so gargantuan in these Democratic states that if the Republicans don't take advantage of it, I think it is a huge political miscalculation.” “So there is this tactical opportunity, which I think if you want to have a chance in the midterms and if you generally wanna have a chance to level-set the country, you must take this and run with it.” “And then separately, if as Friedberg says, it does die on the vine, it is the beginning of the end of the American Empire, unfortunately.”

Chamath: Fraud at this scale will end the American Empire if nothing is done “It is a crucible moment for American society.” “If nothing happens and we deem this kind of theft acceptable, it is the beginning of the end of the American Empire.” “It's just a level of disrespect and lack of care for this country.” “I will be waiting and observing how important it is to root this out, that's number one.” “The second, which is more tactical political calculus, this is an enormous opportunity for the Republican Party if they take this and run with this.” “Is there waste, fraud and abuse in every state? Absolutely. I don't think this is endemically a Democratic problem, but the scale of it is so gargantuan in these Democratic states that if the Republicans don't take advantage of it, I think it is a huge political miscalculation.” “So there is this tactical opportunity, which I think if you want to have a chance in the midterms and if you generally wanna have a chance to level-set the country, you must take this and run with it.” “And then separately, if as Friedberg says, it does die on the vine, it is the beginning of the end of the American Empire, unfortunately.”

The All-In Podcast

10,555,506 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Chamath’s 2026 IPO Advice: Get Public Fast or Get Left Behind Jason: “ What are your thoughts here on the flurry of potential IPOs?” Chamath: “I think that we have a bit of a risk problem. If you think about appetite as equivalent to a person at a Thanksgiving dinner, when you first come in and you see all of this stuff, it's so plentiful, your eyes are bigger than your stomach. And I think in a moment like that, you want to be the one that is consumed first. And I think the risk increases when you are at the tail end because the risk is that the diners will run out of space.” Jason: “Plate fills up. Yeah.” Chamath: “And if you use that analogy, I think the reason why people's plates will get full is probably twofold and maybe threefold. The first and most important thing is there's enough tactical event risk that people generally want to be risk off and have more margin of safety. We have a lot of these really important financial moments tied to this concept of AGI, ASI. We have a real pricing problem. If AGI is real, the durability of most companies is slim to none. If AGI is not real, then the fundraising capacity of these companies that are now raising hundreds of billions of dollars needs to get questioned and inspected thoroughly. History will sort out which one is right, but both cannot be right. So in that vein, I don't think we're going to have this “blockbuster” stream of IPOs. I think what happens is SpaceX is going to get out. They're going to do great, and then maybe the next one does good to great, then the next one will do good, and then the appetite runs out because you just can't absorb, incrementally, trillions of dollars of new demand. And if you think about it, where is it going to come from? Is it going to come from the sidelines? I don't know, I think it's more of a reallocation exercise. But if you look at the S&P, well, most people are now defensively moving away from these kinds of things, towards the things that are more protected, what the industry calls HALO, right? Those things trade for zero today. You could buy hundreds of millions of dollars a year of cashflow for 2-5x right now in the stock market. And so why are you going to go way out on the risk curve and buy something at 200x revenue, let alone earnings? I'm more in the camp of, I think it's good to be first, it’s pretty decent to be second, but if I were you, I would get the heck out, and get public, and get your money, and fortify your balance sheet ASAP, because I think the risk builds the further down the IPO chain you're in.”

Chamath’s 2026 IPO Advice: Get Public Fast or Get Left Behind Jason: “ What are your thoughts here on the flurry of potential IPOs?” Chamath: “I think that we have a bit of a risk problem. If you think about appetite as equivalent to a person at a Thanksgiving dinner, when you first come in and you see all of this stuff, it's so plentiful, your eyes are bigger than your stomach. And I think in a moment like that, you want to be the one that is consumed first. And I think the risk increases when you are at the tail end because the risk is that the diners will run out of space.” Jason: “Plate fills up. Yeah.” Chamath: “And if you use that analogy, I think the reason why people's plates will get full is probably twofold and maybe threefold. The first and most important thing is there's enough tactical event risk that people generally want to be risk off and have more margin of safety. We have a lot of these really important financial moments tied to this concept of AGI, ASI. We have a real pricing problem. If AGI is real, the durability of most companies is slim to none. If AGI is not real, then the fundraising capacity of these companies that are now raising hundreds of billions of dollars needs to get questioned and inspected thoroughly. History will sort out which one is right, but both cannot be right. So in that vein, I don't think we're going to have this “blockbuster” stream of IPOs. I think what happens is SpaceX is going to get out. They're going to do great, and then maybe the next one does good to great, then the next one will do good, and then the appetite runs out because you just can't absorb, incrementally, trillions of dollars of new demand. And if you think about it, where is it going to come from? Is it going to come from the sidelines? I don't know, I think it's more of a reallocation exercise. But if you look at the S&P, well, most people are now defensively moving away from these kinds of things, towards the things that are more protected, what the industry calls HALO, right? Those things trade for zero today. You could buy hundreds of millions of dollars a year of cashflow for 2-5x right now in the stock market. And so why are you going to go way out on the risk curve and buy something at 200x revenue, let alone earnings? I'm more in the camp of, I think it's good to be first, it’s pretty decent to be second, but if I were you, I would get the heck out, and get public, and get your money, and fortify your balance sheet ASAP, because I think the risk builds the further down the IPO chain you're in.”

The All-In Podcast

61,917 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

How does Lee Child start a novel? "If you were a composer writing music, you'd start with a key that you want. G-Major is a cheerful and upbeat key. E-Flat Minor is the opposite. It's down and rather melancholy. So what I do as a writer is start with a vague idea. I want this story to be hard and cold, or I want this story to be hot. And then I'll pick a location that I'm familiar with. I never do research specifically for that book. It always draws on impressions formed over the years from previous visits to places. Do you want it to be the West of Texas, where it's baking hot and arid? Do you want it to be on the Atlantic coast of Maine in April, where it's gray, cold, and misty? So that's how I start. With the sense of place and I'll construct the story around that. The temperature dictates the story." — Lee Child

How does Lee Child start a novel? "If you were a composer writing music, you'd start with a key that you want. G-Major is a cheerful and upbeat key. E-Flat Minor is the opposite. It's down and rather melancholy. So what I do as a writer is start with a vague idea. I want this story to be hard and cold, or I want this story to be hot. And then I'll pick a location that I'm familiar with. I never do research specifically for that book. It always draws on impressions formed over the years from previous visits to places. Do you want it to be the West of Texas, where it's baking hot and arid? Do you want it to be on the Atlantic coast of Maine in April, where it's gray, cold, and misty? So that's how I start. With the sense of place and I'll construct the story around that. The temperature dictates the story." — Lee Child

David Perell

25,139 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

542,874 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Jacob Tierney discusses his process for writing Heated Rivalry and outlining season two: "The book [Heated Rivalry] is in five parts and very quickly I was like, part one, episode one. Part two, episode two. It was very clear to me. …So in this case, I actually did not outline. Because I was just using these parts of this book, and I knew these books so well at this point. Something that I did, and that I'm trying to do again now when I'm writing the new season, is I'm trying to use—Because there's a dreaminess to this show, I try to use my memory as a guide. I'm like, what do I remember? And then I try to give primacy to the stuff that I remember and that has stuck in my brain all these years with this story. So I’m like, oh I have to do that! And that's a nice way for me to kind of center things. Where if I have to do that, then it means maybe I don't have to do this, and it maybe means I want to combine or collapse different things. Because if this is going to take up—If one incident that I'm thinking of is going to take up the space in an episode that I think of as the heart, …then you don't need to do a first version of it in the same way, you know? Little things like that. That being said, for this season because I'm working with a co-writer as well, we have outlined everything. And every time, I do approach outlining like a teenager, where I'm like, [modulates voice] I don't want to. But then when I do it, I'm always like, why don't I always do this? It makes everything so much easier. So I kind of gaslight myself in that way." ✍🏼 transcription via Heated Rivalry News & Updates. Please credit if reposting. 🗣️ quote via q&a with Stage 32 on March 24, 2026. 🔗

Jacob Tierney discusses his process for writing Heated Rivalry and outlining season two: "The book [Heated Rivalry] is in five parts and very quickly I was like, part one, episode one. Part two, episode two. It was very clear to me. …So in this case, I actually did not outline. Because I was just using these parts of this book, and I knew these books so well at this point. Something that I did, and that I'm trying to do again now when I'm writing the new season, is I'm trying to use—Because there's a dreaminess to this show, I try to use my memory as a guide. I'm like, what do I remember? And then I try to give primacy to the stuff that I remember and that has stuck in my brain all these years with this story. So I’m like, oh I have to do that! And that's a nice way for me to kind of center things. Where if I have to do that, then it means maybe I don't have to do this, and it maybe means I want to combine or collapse different things. Because if this is going to take up—If one incident that I'm thinking of is going to take up the space in an episode that I think of as the heart, …then you don't need to do a first version of it in the same way, you know? Little things like that. That being said, for this season because I'm working with a co-writer as well, we have outlined everything. And every time, I do approach outlining like a teenager, where I'm like, [modulates voice] I don't want to. But then when I do it, I'm always like, why don't I always do this? It makes everything so much easier. So I kind of gaslight myself in that way." ✍🏼 transcription via Heated Rivalry News & Updates. Please credit if reposting. 🗣️ quote via q&a with Stage 32 on March 24, 2026. 🔗

Heated Rivalry News & Updates

60,684 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Everyone This Is So Important, PLEASE Take The Time To Listen To Or Read This Post American Electrician Drops Extremely Important Facts About What’s Being Put Into Our Atmosphere ☣️ “I was just out back with my dogs and I grabbed a handful of this stuff and I was going to let it melt on my hands just like this. Okay. One there's a big ice film on here. So I held it and I threw it down and what was left, I wanted to see if it was just going to melt and it did. I was about to throw it down and do this but then I smelled it. I'm an electrician. Whenever burning wire is in a wall or there's an arc, there's a smell that happens instantly. It's called ozone. You know that smell very well as an electrician. You walk in a house, you smell ozone. You know there's a fire. There's an electrical fire somewhere. So I'm trained to smell that smell. And I've never smelled it in snow. Now I'm Gen X and as a boy, 70s and 80s, after the rain you know you would smell an ozone smell and uh it was kind of natural you know it's a little bit just a little bit of ozone uh for just a few minutes but i've never ever ever smelled it in snow so i went and looked it up and uh i want to know the effects of ozone when 48 states all have snow at one time and it's coated in ozone what could that mean Well, when I looked it up, when I looked it up, what it said was that ozone has an effect on humans of irritation to the lungs, coughing, bronchitis, emphysema, all these things can be aggravated. And I know they're about to roll out disease X. They're about to say that everybody's got all these lung issues and all this. So, I started looking at what would cause snow to have this level of ozone to still be trapped in here like this. And ozone, oh so this is the thing, snow forms at around 50,000 feet. And your rain is usually 30,000 feet and lower. And I've always known that even when I was young. And then that changed in the late 90s. They were talking about the clouds were at 50,000 feet it was raining outside that's unnatural it doesn't make any sense and that's when you know i started to realize it was weather modification stuff going on but anyway the point is i started looking into it uh online and said that uh high levels of ozone would come from uh man-made things pollution this and that you know so so they've put something up there in the sky they put something up there to cause all this snow. And we, if you're on this channel, if you're on this page, you already know, or you should, that they're doing, they're manipulating everything. But what they've done is they have sent something down here to us. And we're all out here, it's all about to melt, and we're all gonna breathe it at one time. And it was online, it was saying that massive doses of ozone all at one time are extremely detrimental. They're gonna cause a lot of lung issues, a lot of wheezing, a lot of chest irritation. So, be prepared, watch out for it. Because I was looking around, I mean, it's like 34 here right now. And this isn't melting the way snow usually melts. Like there's a little bit of water right there. But normally, I mean, you know, you've got rivers running down the side of my street and you don't. It's like, it's like it's just evaporating. I've never seen snow melt in this fashion before. Like, my driveway's dry. Like, look at this. See the wet line? There's a wet line and a dry line. And it shouldn't be that way, you know? All this snow should be running together. But it's just right on the edge of the snow. And even down at the end of the snow. If all this snow's melting. That's bone dry. That's bone dry right there. That makes no sense, because the water should be coming down. So, there's weird things happening. It doesn't make sense when you look at it at first, but when you start putting all the pieces together, this is uh, this is the beginning of what they're trying to do. They've sent this down here on us.”

Everyone This Is So Important, PLEASE Take The Time To Listen To Or Read This Post American Electrician Drops Extremely Important Facts About What’s Being Put Into Our Atmosphere ☣️ “I was just out back with my dogs and I grabbed a handful of this stuff and I was going to let it melt on my hands just like this. Okay. One there's a big ice film on here. So I held it and I threw it down and what was left, I wanted to see if it was just going to melt and it did. I was about to throw it down and do this but then I smelled it. I'm an electrician. Whenever burning wire is in a wall or there's an arc, there's a smell that happens instantly. It's called ozone. You know that smell very well as an electrician. You walk in a house, you smell ozone. You know there's a fire. There's an electrical fire somewhere. So I'm trained to smell that smell. And I've never smelled it in snow. Now I'm Gen X and as a boy, 70s and 80s, after the rain you know you would smell an ozone smell and uh it was kind of natural you know it's a little bit just a little bit of ozone uh for just a few minutes but i've never ever ever smelled it in snow so i went and looked it up and uh i want to know the effects of ozone when 48 states all have snow at one time and it's coated in ozone what could that mean Well, when I looked it up, when I looked it up, what it said was that ozone has an effect on humans of irritation to the lungs, coughing, bronchitis, emphysema, all these things can be aggravated. And I know they're about to roll out disease X. They're about to say that everybody's got all these lung issues and all this. So, I started looking at what would cause snow to have this level of ozone to still be trapped in here like this. And ozone, oh so this is the thing, snow forms at around 50,000 feet. And your rain is usually 30,000 feet and lower. And I've always known that even when I was young. And then that changed in the late 90s. They were talking about the clouds were at 50,000 feet it was raining outside that's unnatural it doesn't make any sense and that's when you know i started to realize it was weather modification stuff going on but anyway the point is i started looking into it uh online and said that uh high levels of ozone would come from uh man-made things pollution this and that you know so so they've put something up there in the sky they put something up there to cause all this snow. And we, if you're on this channel, if you're on this page, you already know, or you should, that they're doing, they're manipulating everything. But what they've done is they have sent something down here to us. And we're all out here, it's all about to melt, and we're all gonna breathe it at one time. And it was online, it was saying that massive doses of ozone all at one time are extremely detrimental. They're gonna cause a lot of lung issues, a lot of wheezing, a lot of chest irritation. So, be prepared, watch out for it. Because I was looking around, I mean, it's like 34 here right now. And this isn't melting the way snow usually melts. Like there's a little bit of water right there. But normally, I mean, you know, you've got rivers running down the side of my street and you don't. It's like, it's like it's just evaporating. I've never seen snow melt in this fashion before. Like, my driveway's dry. Like, look at this. See the wet line? There's a wet line and a dry line. And it shouldn't be that way, you know? All this snow should be running together. But it's just right on the edge of the snow. And even down at the end of the snow. If all this snow's melting. That's bone dry. That's bone dry right there. That makes no sense, because the water should be coming down. So, there's weird things happening. It doesn't make sense when you look at it at first, but when you start putting all the pieces together, this is uh, this is the beginning of what they're trying to do. They've sent this down here on us.”

Wall Street Apes

1,693,675 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Vance: "I always find it interesting, even if I granted, for the sake of argument, that I believe this or that thing...do you think that it would be moral or appropriate to go out there and whine publicly about a decision the President of the United States had made? I'm not a commentator, I'm the Vice President! I serve in the administration, the American people elected him to be in charge of it."

Vance: "I always find it interesting, even if I granted, for the sake of argument, that I believe this or that thing...do you think that it would be moral or appropriate to go out there and whine publicly about a decision the President of the United States had made? I'm not a commentator, I'm the Vice President! I serve in the administration, the American people elected him to be in charge of it."

Grand Marshall Skrain G. Dukat

51,824 просмотров • 5 дней назад

"The fact that you go all in on stocks makes you a gambler, not an investor." I hear this a lot. I have since I started investing with $20,000 in 2019 and went all in $TSLA. I hear it more today now that I'm investing millions of dollars in 2026, because this year has admittedly been one of my worst. Yet, I'm still looking a lot better than the $40,000 I would have if I had bought the S&P 500 in 2019. What people don't understand about my investing strategy is that because I buy asymmetrical bets where valuations are low and the stocks are counted out and disliked, I haven't had to be right every investment to maintain an ~80% CAGR since 2019, (yes counting from the trough I'm currently in). When I'm wrong I live to fight another day even despite often investing 100% of my net liquidity into a single position. If I'm right about $BETR and we get substantial rate cuts in the next five years... I'm not gonna recover from $1.5 million back to $10 million. I'm gonna hit $50 million+ I know the market is starting to think that rate cuts are nothing but a dream and Better is not a threat to incumbents... but funny enough that's the exact moment that you should be buying into a stock if you disagree. What's great is I only have to be right on one of these two points in order to make a lot of money over the next five years. For those in $PATH with me I want to say that I don't believe I was wrong about PATH at all. I still believe in the company, and still have a 5% position and still think that it's going to 5-10x over the next 5 years. However as software has pulled back and I discovered the Better opportunity, I decided it was smart to move up the risk curve (smaller market cap, less revenue, not profitable yet) to something that has sold off even more, has even more upside potential and an even faster growth rate. When everything in the software sector is out of favor and sold off, Higher Beta stocks are likely to go up a lot more if we see a sector wide recovery. I truly don't believe Better deserves to sell off any more than it currently has ($85 to $29) even if we found out it's only going to be a 10% revenue growth company after this year, which would be a huge disappointment. The valuation is simply already that discounted. Of course all of this is shared for entertainment. I am not your investment advisor, though i am out-returning him.

"The fact that you go all in on stocks makes you a gambler, not an investor." I hear this a lot. I have since I started investing with $20,000 in 2019 and went all in $TSLA. I hear it more today now that I'm investing millions of dollars in 2026, because this year has admittedly been one of my worst. Yet, I'm still looking a lot better than the $40,000 I would have if I had bought the S&P 500 in 2019. What people don't understand about my investing strategy is that because I buy asymmetrical bets where valuations are low and the stocks are counted out and disliked, I haven't had to be right every investment to maintain an ~80% CAGR since 2019, (yes counting from the trough I'm currently in). When I'm wrong I live to fight another day even despite often investing 100% of my net liquidity into a single position. If I'm right about $BETR and we get substantial rate cuts in the next five years... I'm not gonna recover from $1.5 million back to $10 million. I'm gonna hit $50 million+ I know the market is starting to think that rate cuts are nothing but a dream and Better is not a threat to incumbents... but funny enough that's the exact moment that you should be buying into a stock if you disagree. What's great is I only have to be right on one of these two points in order to make a lot of money over the next five years. For those in $PATH with me I want to say that I don't believe I was wrong about PATH at all. I still believe in the company, and still have a 5% position and still think that it's going to 5-10x over the next 5 years. However as software has pulled back and I discovered the Better opportunity, I decided it was smart to move up the risk curve (smaller market cap, less revenue, not profitable yet) to something that has sold off even more, has even more upside potential and an even faster growth rate. When everything in the software sector is out of favor and sold off, Higher Beta stocks are likely to go up a lot more if we see a sector wide recovery. I truly don't believe Better deserves to sell off any more than it currently has ($85 to $29) even if we found out it's only going to be a 10% revenue growth company after this year, which would be a huge disappointment. The valuation is simply already that discounted. Of course all of this is shared for entertainment. I am not your investment advisor, though i am out-returning him.

Jake Browatzke 🚀

10,711 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

TCG expert explains why you should fully AVOID the modern Pokémon market “Do NOT dabble into the modern Pokémon market, they print 100s of thousands of copies of these cards and they are going for thousands of dollars right off the gate” “If you think that is a smart place to put your money I have no words for you other then “if you wanna swing trade it then swing trade it and try to extract as much as you can, but if you think this is a good investment in the short term SELL them all”

TCG expert explains why you should fully AVOID the modern Pokémon market “Do NOT dabble into the modern Pokémon market, they print 100s of thousands of copies of these cards and they are going for thousands of dollars right off the gate” “If you think that is a smart place to put your money I have no words for you other then “if you wanna swing trade it then swing trade it and try to extract as much as you can, but if you think this is a good investment in the short term SELL them all”

Vēnø

27,339 просмотров • 20 дней назад

🎙️Lando Norris about always staying true to himself: (If you have a moment, whether you like him or not, listen to this. It might be one of his best and most genuine answers) "I'm happy I won it my way" "I got the most out of what I am" "I know I've said some things about Max, Lewis. Some things I regret and I wish I could take back" "Do I regret some of the things I've said? Yes. A lot of them were in the heat of the moment" "Deep down I hate when you write crap about me? I do. It's also life and I've learnt to live with that" "I won it in my way. Try to be a good person, a good team member. I'm proud about that. No matter what other people write about it. No one knows the truth apart from the people on the inside in terms of what's going on" "As long as I know I've done a good job then that's the only thing I need to listen to"

🎙️Lando Norris about always staying true to himself: (If you have a moment, whether you like him or not, listen to this. It might be one of his best and most genuine answers) "I'm happy I won it my way" "I got the most out of what I am" "I know I've said some things about Max, Lewis. Some things I regret and I wish I could take back" "Do I regret some of the things I've said? Yes. A lot of them were in the heat of the moment" "Deep down I hate when you write crap about me? I do. It's also life and I've learnt to live with that" "I won it in my way. Try to be a good person, a good team member. I'm proud about that. No matter what other people write about it. No one knows the truth apart from the people on the inside in terms of what's going on" "As long as I know I've done a good job then that's the only thing I need to listen to"

McLaren News | 🇬🇧 🇦🇺

160,676 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

American says “There's going to be some major consequences” for the Charlie Kirk assassination “I can't stop thinking about it. Never met the man. I never went to any of his rallies. I've only ever seen clips of him on YouTube and TikTok, but I can't explain it. I've seen everybody else in the world on TikTok, they have the same feeling I'm stricken with such a level of grief that I can't understand a grief of a level of a person that I've never met before. I didn't even feel that bad at my grandmother's funeral, and I am griefing I've this man known him like. for 20 years. I don't know what kind of things this is going to bring upon the world, but it's not going to be good. I don't know. Because if I'm feeling this level of grief and everybody else around the world is feeling the exact same, there's going to be some major consequences to it. And I just hope everybody's ready for it, because I don't think it's going to be good, but maybe it's something we need.”

American says “There's going to be some major consequences” for the Charlie Kirk assassination “I can't stop thinking about it. Never met the man. I never went to any of his rallies. I've only ever seen clips of him on YouTube and TikTok, but I can't explain it. I've seen everybody else in the world on TikTok, they have the same feeling I'm stricken with such a level of grief that I can't understand a grief of a level of a person that I've never met before. I didn't even feel that bad at my grandmother's funeral, and I am griefing I've this man known him like. for 20 years. I don't know what kind of things this is going to bring upon the world, but it's not going to be good. I don't know. Because if I'm feeling this level of grief and everybody else around the world is feeling the exact same, there's going to be some major consequences to it. And I just hope everybody's ready for it, because I don't think it's going to be good, but maybe it's something we need.”

Wall Street Apes

171,617 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsht “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the fk 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely fking closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sht up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

574,026 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Thought today was another really good Scottie Scheffler presser but particularly this answer when talking about dealing with the pressure of the career Grand Slam. "It's kind of a funny thing. It's like, yeah, if I win this tournament, that would be amazing, but I think then I show up the next week, and it's like, okay, now Scottie's won the grand slam, he's won all these golf tournaments. Now where do we go from here? So no matter what, I think as a player and as a professional athlete, you're never going to live up to the expectations of people. I think sometimes that's a little bit of the fallacy in our sport is like, if I win the U.S. Open, then I'm going to be satisfied. I've won all the tournaments, and my career is essentially over, and I've accomplished everything I could want to accomplish. But I think the goal posts are always just moved further and further. "For me, would it be a dream to win the U.S. Open? Of course. But at the end of the day, like I -- the grand slam has never been a motivating factor for me. I always just wanted to be the best version of myself, and that got me this far."

Thought today was another really good Scottie Scheffler presser but particularly this answer when talking about dealing with the pressure of the career Grand Slam. "It's kind of a funny thing. It's like, yeah, if I win this tournament, that would be amazing, but I think then I show up the next week, and it's like, okay, now Scottie's won the grand slam, he's won all these golf tournaments. Now where do we go from here? So no matter what, I think as a player and as a professional athlete, you're never going to live up to the expectations of people. I think sometimes that's a little bit of the fallacy in our sport is like, if I win the U.S. Open, then I'm going to be satisfied. I've won all the tournaments, and my career is essentially over, and I've accomplished everything I could want to accomplish. But I think the goal posts are always just moved further and further. "For me, would it be a dream to win the U.S. Open? Of course. But at the end of the day, like I -- the grand slam has never been a motivating factor for me. I always just wanted to be the best version of myself, and that got me this far."

Cameron Jourdan

239,071 просмотров • 9 дней назад

Elon Musk Exposes the "Corporate Terrorists" Controlling Half of Wall Street's Voting Rights Elon Musk: “I do think we've got a fundamental issue with corporate governance in publicly traded companies, where you've got about half of the stock market controlled by passive index funds, and most of them outsource their decision to advisory firms, particularly Glass Lewis and ISS.” “I call them corporate ISIS. They’re just terrorists.” “Glass Lewis and ISS control the vote of half the stock market.” “They own no stock in any of these companies.” “Now, if you're a political activist, you know what a great place would be to go work? ISS and Glass Lewis. And they do.” “You know where political activists go? They go where the power is.” “I think that this is a fundamental breakdown of fiduciary responsibility here.” “You know, the Tesla thing is, it's called sort of compensation, but really it's not about compensation.” “It’s not like I'm gonna go out and buy, you know, a yacht with it or something.” “It's just that if I'm going to build up Optimus and have all these robots out there, I need to make sure we do not have a Terminator scenario, and I can maximize the safety of the robots.” “I feel like I need to have something like a 25% vote, which is enough of a vote to have a strong influence, but not so much of a vote that I can't be fired if I go insane.” “But my concern would be creating this army of robots and then being fired for political reasons because ISS and Glass Lewis fire me effectively, even though I've done everything right.” @jason: “If you don't get that vote, if it doesn't go your way, it looks like it's going to, would you leave?” “I mean, is that even in the cards? I heard the board was very concerned about that.” Elon: “Let's just say I'm not going to build a robot army if I can be easily kicked out by activist investors.”

Elon Musk Exposes the "Corporate Terrorists" Controlling Half of Wall Street's Voting Rights Elon Musk: “I do think we've got a fundamental issue with corporate governance in publicly traded companies, where you've got about half of the stock market controlled by passive index funds, and most of them outsource their decision to advisory firms, particularly Glass Lewis and ISS.” “I call them corporate ISIS. They’re just terrorists.” “Glass Lewis and ISS control the vote of half the stock market.” “They own no stock in any of these companies.” “Now, if you're a political activist, you know what a great place would be to go work? ISS and Glass Lewis. And they do.” “You know where political activists go? They go where the power is.” “I think that this is a fundamental breakdown of fiduciary responsibility here.” “You know, the Tesla thing is, it's called sort of compensation, but really it's not about compensation.” “It’s not like I'm gonna go out and buy, you know, a yacht with it or something.” “It's just that if I'm going to build up Optimus and have all these robots out there, I need to make sure we do not have a Terminator scenario, and I can maximize the safety of the robots.” “I feel like I need to have something like a 25% vote, which is enough of a vote to have a strong influence, but not so much of a vote that I can't be fired if I go insane.” “But my concern would be creating this army of robots and then being fired for political reasons because ISS and Glass Lewis fire me effectively, even though I've done everything right.” @jason: “If you don't get that vote, if it doesn't go your way, it looks like it's going to, would you leave?” “I mean, is that even in the cards? I heard the board was very concerned about that.” Elon: “Let's just say I'm not going to build a robot army if I can be easily kicked out by activist investors.”

The All-In Podcast

90,392 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Alan Watts on why meditation has no purpose: Alan Watts begins by explaining the first basic reason for meditation. It interrupts our constant internal monologue: "Now, obviously, if I talk all the time, I don't hear what anyone else has to say. And so in exactly the same way, if I think all the time, that is to say, if I talk to myself all the time, I don't have anything to think about except thoughts. And therefore, I'm living entirely in the world of symbols and am never in relationship with reality." But then Watts pivots to a deeper, more counterintuitive point: meditation, properly understood, has no purpose at all. He compares it to music and dancing: "When we make music, we don't do it in order to reach a certain point, such as the end of the composition. If that were the purpose of music, to get to the end of the piece then obviously the fastest players would be the best." The same applies to dance: "When we dance, we are not aiming to arrive at a particular place on the floor, as we would be if we were taking a journey. When we dance, the journey itself is the point. When we play music, the playing itself is the point." This is where Watts delivers his core insight about meditation: "Meditation is the discovery that the point of life is always arrived at in the immediate moment. And therefore, if you meditate for an ulterior motive, that is to say, to improve your mind, to improve your character, to be more efficient in life, you've got your eye on the future and you are not meditating." Watts argues the future is an illusion we chase at our own expense: "Because the future is a concept. It doesn't exist. As the proverb says, 'tomorrow never comes.' There is no such thing as tomorrow. There never will be. Because time is always now." He pushes back against how religion has framed contemplative practice: "Meditation is supposed to be fun. It's not something you do as a grim duty. The trouble with religion as we know it is that it is so mixed up with grim duties. We do it because it's good for you; it's a kind of self-punishment." Watts closes with what he calls the real essence of the practice: "It's a kind of digging the present. It's a kind of grooving with the eternal now and brings us into a state of peace where we can understand that the point of life. The place where it's at is simply here and now."

Alan Watts on why meditation has no purpose: Alan Watts begins by explaining the first basic reason for meditation. It interrupts our constant internal monologue: "Now, obviously, if I talk all the time, I don't hear what anyone else has to say. And so in exactly the same way, if I think all the time, that is to say, if I talk to myself all the time, I don't have anything to think about except thoughts. And therefore, I'm living entirely in the world of symbols and am never in relationship with reality." But then Watts pivots to a deeper, more counterintuitive point: meditation, properly understood, has no purpose at all. He compares it to music and dancing: "When we make music, we don't do it in order to reach a certain point, such as the end of the composition. If that were the purpose of music, to get to the end of the piece then obviously the fastest players would be the best." The same applies to dance: "When we dance, we are not aiming to arrive at a particular place on the floor, as we would be if we were taking a journey. When we dance, the journey itself is the point. When we play music, the playing itself is the point." This is where Watts delivers his core insight about meditation: "Meditation is the discovery that the point of life is always arrived at in the immediate moment. And therefore, if you meditate for an ulterior motive, that is to say, to improve your mind, to improve your character, to be more efficient in life, you've got your eye on the future and you are not meditating." Watts argues the future is an illusion we chase at our own expense: "Because the future is a concept. It doesn't exist. As the proverb says, 'tomorrow never comes.' There is no such thing as tomorrow. There never will be. Because time is always now." He pushes back against how religion has framed contemplative practice: "Meditation is supposed to be fun. It's not something you do as a grim duty. The trouble with religion as we know it is that it is so mixed up with grim duties. We do it because it's good for you; it's a kind of self-punishment." Watts closes with what he calls the real essence of the practice: "It's a kind of digging the present. It's a kind of grooving with the eternal now and brings us into a state of peace where we can understand that the point of life. The place where it's at is simply here and now."

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

13,102 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ICT on the MMXM SILVER BULLET 💎 "Its the lottery trade The casino payout The jackpot Its what youre looking for really But you need to understand what makes that, that 2nd level of re-accumulation before it gets to the Draw On Liquidity When we have the Market Maker Buy Model there is always going to be at least 2 re-accumulations Why? This is so interbank traders cant miss it They cant miss it This basically lays it on their lap Its laid on a silver platter neon sign Its right here boys come and get it And they serve it up to them" 🏴‍☠️

ICT on the MMXM SILVER BULLET 💎 "Its the lottery trade The casino payout The jackpot Its what youre looking for really But you need to understand what makes that, that 2nd level of re-accumulation before it gets to the Draw On Liquidity When we have the Market Maker Buy Model there is always going to be at least 2 re-accumulations Why? This is so interbank traders cant miss it They cant miss it This basically lays it on their lap Its laid on a silver platter neon sign Its right here boys come and get it And they serve it up to them" 🏴‍☠️

Pepethuglife

89,205 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“I know that I won't have this moment again in this exact same way. I think the success of Brat and the success of the marketing of Brat is also in ways a curse. I'm not going to be able to market my next album in the same way. I'll pivot, but whatever I do next will be compared. Even if the music is completely different, the scale, the way it's rolled out, the level of conversation, I'm aware that whatever comes next, this [Brat] is kind of the albatross.”

“I know that I won't have this moment again in this exact same way. I think the success of Brat and the success of the marketing of Brat is also in ways a curse. I'm not going to be able to market my next album in the same way. I'll pivot, but whatever I do next will be compared. Even if the music is completely different, the scale, the way it's rolled out, the level of conversation, I'm aware that whatever comes next, this [Brat] is kind of the albatross.”

sophia

73,790 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This was awesome. I got the opportunity to describe to Rick Rubin how I make Founders podcast: “Steph Curry was asked: What do you think of when you're taking a shot? And he said: Absolutely nothing. I’ve had people ask me how I choose what to highlight. What are you thinking of when you're doing this? And my response is: Nothing. I just read and if something jumps out to me I don't think at all, I just underline it. And then I'll go back through and reread all my highlights. And if that part is still interesting, it was interesting the first time, now it's interesting the second time, it's probably interesting to other people. There's 10 million mes out there. I'm not unique. And there's no way that if I read this line twice and found it interesting that if I read it on a podcast that somebody else is not going to think it's interesting too. If I overthink it or if I think of “oh this person might hear it” or “oh this many people will hear it” that gets in the way. I'm thinking of nothing.”

This was awesome. I got the opportunity to describe to Rick Rubin how I make Founders podcast: “Steph Curry was asked: What do you think of when you're taking a shot? And he said: Absolutely nothing. I’ve had people ask me how I choose what to highlight. What are you thinking of when you're doing this? And my response is: Nothing. I just read and if something jumps out to me I don't think at all, I just underline it. And then I'll go back through and reread all my highlights. And if that part is still interesting, it was interesting the first time, now it's interesting the second time, it's probably interesting to other people. There's 10 million mes out there. I'm not unique. And there's no way that if I read this line twice and found it interesting that if I read it on a podcast that somebody else is not going to think it's interesting too. If I overthink it or if I think of “oh this person might hear it” or “oh this many people will hear it” that gets in the way. I'm thinking of nothing.”

David Senra

32,924 просмотров • 1 месяц назад