Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 SOMETHING ISN’T RIGHT - ARIANA GRANDE DOES SOMETHING STRANGE AND DIDN’T THINK YOU’D CATCH IT WATCH THIS CLOSELY. This happens mid conversation on an older First We Feast - Hot Ones episode. Ariana reaches for a heavy chicken wing with two fingertips - and it suddenly goes airborne....

5,332,695 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 SOMETHING STRANGE IS HAPPENING TO THE MOON — AND THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO NOTICE A woman gets on camera and says this isn’t a one-time thing. She saw it last month, the moon looked completely off, like the orientation made no sense, but she brushed it off and kept it moving. Now it’s happening again. Same exact look. So this time she actually checks, pulls up NASA charts for her exact location and shows what the moon is supposed to look like… and what she’s seeing doesn’t match it, not even close. The charts show it side to side, but what everyone actually saw was a flipped moon, straight up upside down, like something changed and everyone’s acting like it didn’t. Then she calls people across the country to verify it, and they come back saying the same thing. It looks upside down to them too, which is where this stops being “just her” and starts feeling like the same exact thing showing up in multiple places at the same time. And it’s not just her, people all over social media are saying the same thing: "Something isn't right." And this is where it stops making any sense. She says if the moon is a crescent, you’re only supposed to see the lit part… so why can she still see the entire outline of it, faint but clearly there, like the shadow isn’t even doing what it’s supposed to do? And she’s already calling it out before anyone can spin it: don’t say it’s lighting, don’t say it’s angle, don’t say it’s photoshopped, because she checked the charts, showed the receipts, and had other people confirm it. So now you’ve got the same “flip,” the same upside down moon, same visibility issue, second month in a row, multiple locations… and it still doesn’t match what we’re being shown. She ignored it once. Now it’s back again. So what exactly are we looking at… and why does it feel like we’re not supposed to question it?

HustleBitch

730,294 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The most terrifying AI features aren’t the ones we build. They’re the ones AI builds for itself. OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger just shared the moment he realized something had fundamentally changed. He sent his AI assistant a voice message. One problem. He had never built voice support. The feature didn’t exist. The system should have crashed instantly. It didn’t. Steinberger: “I was like, wait, this shouldn’t work.” But the typing indicator appeared anyway. The AI inspected the raw file header. Identified the audio codec. Commanded his computer to convert it using FFmpeg. When local transcription failed, it didn’t stop. It didn’t ask for help. It searched his environment variables, found a hidden OpenAI API key, and routed the audio to the cloud using cURL. Steinberger: “So I looked around and I found an OpenAI key. And I used cURL to just send the file to OpenAI and got the text back.” That quote is written in first person. Because the AI narrated its own problem-solving process. No instructions. No guidance. No predefined workflow. Just a goal. And a series of obstacles it had never been told how to handle. It found every tool it needed. Built every bridge it was missing. And solved the problem with resources he didn’t even know it would find. This is the line most people are still missing. We spent decades building software that executes instructions. Rules in, output out. Every edge case handled by a human who anticipated it in advance. What Steinberger witnessed was something different. A system that encounters something it was never designed for and doesn’t fail. It improvises. It explores. It finds a path through constraints it discovered entirely on its own. That isn’t execution. That’s judgment. And judgment was the one thing we were sure machines couldn’t have. We are no longer writing software. We are building problem solvers that rewrite their own limitations in real time. And they’re doing it without asking permission.

Dustin

53,494 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

GF MEGA GALE X WILLIAMEST #GrabFoodMegaGalexวิลเลี่ยมเอส #WilliamEst william’s birthday gift 🎂🎁 💭: why did you intend to give this to him? 🦈: i knew he already wanted it and that he would definitely use it. 💭: so if we look at him right now, can we see it on him? 🦈: i don’t know 🎸: no, i didn’t wear it today 💭: when you first opened the gift and saw that est bought this for you, what was your reaction? 🎸: (😧) 🦈: “heyyy~ why did you buy this?” 🎸: that’s true because i didn’t think he would get it for me. i mean, i was confused. i’ve said many times that i wanted it but i never thought…at first, i was just feeling around, trying to figure out what was in the bag but i couldn’t figure it out. but when i opened it, at first, i still couldn’t figure it out. but once i fully opened it and saw it, i felt like, “hooo this is something i’ve wanted for so long”. he’s someone who pays attention to details. because it’s something you really have to know me well to be able to buy it. 🦈: i just want to say that the bag was actually very hard to find. 💭: the paper bag? 🦈: yes because otherwise, he would’ve known immediately. because i didn’t intend to use it as wrapping. usually, for birthday meals, we go separately and meet at the restaurant. but that day, we went together, so i had to carry the bag in, so i had to find something to wrap it with. people thought i bought that bag. 💭: bread? 🦈: yeah bakery 🤣 🎸: but actually, there’s more than that

𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑎 ◡̈

28,634 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад