Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Sorry bud, we still didn’t forget 😭

24,617 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

32 Yorum

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones profil fotoğrafı
InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones7 gün önce

Are you too stupid to understand this is a blatant non-sequitur? This is beyond dumb. P1: Person A (me) holds to belief B (the son of man is the most glorified) P2: Person X (Sanders) holds to belief Y (the son of man is not Jesus). C: Therefore, Jesus in the gospels does not think He in the son of man. If you think this is a win you do not know how basic logic works. 😂

Ahraz profil fotoğrafı
Ahraz6 gün önce

Based on mainstream biblical scholarship (EP Sanders, Bart Ehrman, Rudolph Bultmann,etc) the son of man is a distinct figure that is NOT himself I couldn’t care less about your baseless assertions I wonder which future glorified figure came and established the kingdom of God🤔

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones profil fotoğrafı
InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones6 gün önce

Look at what you just said, LOL. Say it again slowly. According to EP Sanders, Bart Ehrman, Rudolph Bultmann, etc., Jesus is not the Son of Man. Thanks for admitting I didn’t concede that point, because I’m obviously none of those people. You guys constantly cook yourselves. Libby’s argument was not even valid, let alone sound. 🤣

Nick Matau profil fotoğrafı
Nick Matau7 gün önce

But he is wrong. Ahmed means "highly praised", "most commendable", or "one who constantly thanks God" lol He changed it just to try to force an argument 😭

Ahraz profil fotoğrafı
Ahraz7 gün önce

Already with this objection

Nick Matau profil fotoğrafı
Nick Matau7 gün önce

Oof... let me school you Ahmed – Rooted in Hamd (حَمْد), which specifically means to state someone's good qualities out of love and reverence. It translates to "the most praised" or "the most commendable." "Most Glorified" (or "most exalted in glory") would typically stem from roots like Majd (مَجْد - glory) or Subhan (سُبْحَان - glory/perfection). For example, Amjad (أَمْجَد) means "most glorious."

Ahraz profil fotoğrafı
Ahraz7 gün önce

Why the hell would I care what glory in Arabic is when I’m looking at a Greek text?😭😭 are you ok? I would look for the Arabic equivalent of Doxe, which is the Greek word used for the son of Man. Spoiler: it’s Hamd, the root in Ahmed.

Noragami 5¥ profil fotoğrafı
Noragami 5¥7 gün önce

Don't forget that he pulled a ponzi scheme on his retarded Christian viewers and raised 100K usd.

LogicRak profil fotoğrafı
LogicRak7 gün önce

ya bud, we didnt forget muslims defending this.. 😭

mincu curut profil fotoğrafı
mincu curut7 gün önce

Are you stupid posting how dumb Libiano is?? Using Libiano logic, we can say Ahmed is God! Libiano think Ahmed is Most Glorified, and in Christianity the most glorified is God. Therefor Muhamad is God. This is how stupid Libiano logic are.

mincu curut profil fotoğrafı
mincu curut6 gün önce

Rahmat in Arabic mean Grace in English. Therefor a person name Grace is same person with Rahmat. This is how stupid Libiano and your argument is. Thx to show that to us.

Louis profil fotoğrafı
Louis7 gün önce

So Orthoducklips just lies and draws conclusion even though the Son of Man is Jesus. So he is committing Shirk by making Muhammad devine. What a piece of shit Orthoducklips is. Hell fire is waiting for him.

Ahraz profil fotoğrafı
Ahraz6 gün önce

Where’s the lie? It’s a fact the mainstream biblical scholars recognize that the son of man Jesus speaks about is a future figure that is not himself. Cope all you want

Louis profil fotoğrafı
Louis6 gün önce

Which mainstream biblical scholars? You are lying bro.

Ahraz profil fotoğrafı
Ahraz6 gün önce

EP Sanders, Bart Ehrman, Rudolph Bultmann, Adela Collins, and more

Louis profil fotoğrafı
Louis6 gün önce

These are atheists dumbass.

Ahraz profil fotoğrafı
Ahraz6 gün önce

You asked for mainstream biblical scholars. These are mainstream biblical scholars. Cope

Louis profil fotoğrafı
Louis6 gün önce

But they aren't mainstream Christian scholars. What does that help. Bart Erhman is an agnostic atheist so how is he a Christian scholar. You lied.

Ahraz profil fotoğrafı
Ahraz6 gün önce

I never said Christian scholar, I said mainstream biblical scholars. Are you illiterate? It doesn’t matter if they’re Christian or not, they are biblical scholars and scholars on the historical Jesus. Anyhow, EP sanders is a Christian anyway, so you’re wrong still. Try again.

Giorgis profil fotoğrafı
Giorgis7 gün önce

Muslims make the dumbest arguments and think that is great.

The Worst Apologist profil fotoğrafı
The Worst Apologist7 gün önce

You mean when Mike destroyed Libby so hard that they had to distort his positions repeatedly?

Esmer H Gor profil fotoğrafı
Esmer H Gor7 gün önce

Sahih al-Bukhari 4428. Yes, "most glorified" by having his aorta cut off for spreading false teachings. "Most glorified".

Only profil fotoğrafı
Only7 gün önce

We Christians will never forget Jay Dyer Destroyed lesbiano in 30 seconds "The reading is plain reading" or Godlogic making lesbiano say "Jesus is Yahweh"

Azza profil fotoğrafı
Azza7 gün önce

this is retarded muhammad is not the one sitting next to god its jesus muhammad is dead in the grave jesus isnt jesus is coming back to judge muhammad isnt...

Only profil fotoğrafı
Only7 gün önce

How is this a rebuttal? This is a ReBUTTal like Al Butt of your prophet

LGP4A profil fotoğrafı
LGP4A7 gün önce

Jesus is the Son of Man.

7h3cr1ms0nfckr profil fotoğrafı
7h3cr1ms0nfckr7 gün önce

Daniel 7 doesn't have anything to do with Islam.

Ahraz profil fotoğrafı
Ahraz6 gün önce

It has everything to do with it actually

7h3cr1ms0nfckr profil fotoğrafı
7h3cr1ms0nfckr6 gün önce

Nothing to do with Mohammed. Dipshit didn't make one sound argument to support his point.

Melkisedet profil fotoğrafı
Melkisedet7 gün önce

Inbreeding and pedophilia have very bad argument

bander profil fotoğrafı
bander7 gün önce

They deadass translated his name to hide it

Objective Christian profil fotoğrafı
Objective Christian6 gün önce

is proof that Islam is for weak-minded men and the brainwashed women they enslave. So, citing Ehrman eh? You mean the atheist who doesn't believe in God, rejects any form of validity for the Quran, and maintains the Bible is excellently preserved in spite of insignificant changes? Is THIS the Bart Ehrman you mean????? 🤣😆🫵

Benzer Videolar