正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Sorry bud, we still didn’t forget 😭

24,617 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

32 条评论

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones 的头像
InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones7 天前

Are you too stupid to understand this is a blatant non-sequitur? This is beyond dumb. P1: Person A (me) holds to belief B (the son of man is the most glorified) P2: Person X (Sanders) holds to belief Y (the son of man is not Jesus). C: Therefore, Jesus in the gospels does not think He in the son of man. If you think this is a win you do not know how basic logic works. 😂

Ahraz 的头像
Ahraz6 天前

Based on mainstream biblical scholarship (EP Sanders, Bart Ehrman, Rudolph Bultmann,etc) the son of man is a distinct figure that is NOT himself I couldn’t care less about your baseless assertions I wonder which future glorified figure came and established the kingdom of God🤔

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones 的头像
InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones6 天前

Look at what you just said, LOL. Say it again slowly. According to EP Sanders, Bart Ehrman, Rudolph Bultmann, etc., Jesus is not the Son of Man. Thanks for admitting I didn’t concede that point, because I’m obviously none of those people. You guys constantly cook yourselves. Libby’s argument was not even valid, let alone sound. 🤣

Nick Matau 的头像
Nick Matau7 天前

But he is wrong. Ahmed means "highly praised", "most commendable", or "one who constantly thanks God" lol He changed it just to try to force an argument 😭

Ahraz 的头像
Ahraz7 天前

Already with this objection

Nick Matau 的头像
Nick Matau7 天前

Oof... let me school you Ahmed – Rooted in Hamd (حَمْد), which specifically means to state someone's good qualities out of love and reverence. It translates to "the most praised" or "the most commendable." "Most Glorified" (or "most exalted in glory") would typically stem from roots like Majd (مَجْد - glory) or Subhan (سُبْحَان - glory/perfection). For example, Amjad (أَمْجَد) means "most glorious."

Ahraz 的头像
Ahraz7 天前

Why the hell would I care what glory in Arabic is when I’m looking at a Greek text?😭😭 are you ok? I would look for the Arabic equivalent of Doxe, which is the Greek word used for the son of Man. Spoiler: it’s Hamd, the root in Ahmed.

Noragami 5¥ 的头像
Noragami 5¥7 天前

Don't forget that he pulled a ponzi scheme on his retarded Christian viewers and raised 100K usd.

LogicRak 的头像
LogicRak7 天前

ya bud, we didnt forget muslims defending this.. 😭

mincu curut 的头像
mincu curut7 天前

Are you stupid posting how dumb Libiano is?? Using Libiano logic, we can say Ahmed is God! Libiano think Ahmed is Most Glorified, and in Christianity the most glorified is God. Therefor Muhamad is God. This is how stupid Libiano logic are.

mincu curut 的头像
mincu curut6 天前

Rahmat in Arabic mean Grace in English. Therefor a person name Grace is same person with Rahmat. This is how stupid Libiano and your argument is. Thx to show that to us.

Louis 的头像
Louis7 天前

So Orthoducklips just lies and draws conclusion even though the Son of Man is Jesus. So he is committing Shirk by making Muhammad devine. What a piece of shit Orthoducklips is. Hell fire is waiting for him.

Ahraz 的头像
Ahraz6 天前

Where’s the lie? It’s a fact the mainstream biblical scholars recognize that the son of man Jesus speaks about is a future figure that is not himself. Cope all you want

Louis 的头像
Louis6 天前

Which mainstream biblical scholars? You are lying bro.

Ahraz 的头像
Ahraz6 天前

EP Sanders, Bart Ehrman, Rudolph Bultmann, Adela Collins, and more

Louis 的头像
Louis6 天前

These are atheists dumbass.

Ahraz 的头像
Ahraz6 天前

You asked for mainstream biblical scholars. These are mainstream biblical scholars. Cope

Louis 的头像
Louis6 天前

But they aren't mainstream Christian scholars. What does that help. Bart Erhman is an agnostic atheist so how is he a Christian scholar. You lied.

Ahraz 的头像
Ahraz6 天前

I never said Christian scholar, I said mainstream biblical scholars. Are you illiterate? It doesn’t matter if they’re Christian or not, they are biblical scholars and scholars on the historical Jesus. Anyhow, EP sanders is a Christian anyway, so you’re wrong still. Try again.

Giorgis 的头像
Giorgis7 天前

Muslims make the dumbest arguments and think that is great.

The Worst Apologist 的头像
The Worst Apologist7 天前

You mean when Mike destroyed Libby so hard that they had to distort his positions repeatedly?

Esmer H Gor 的头像
Esmer H Gor7 天前

Sahih al-Bukhari 4428. Yes, "most glorified" by having his aorta cut off for spreading false teachings. "Most glorified".

Only 的头像
Only7 天前

We Christians will never forget Jay Dyer Destroyed lesbiano in 30 seconds "The reading is plain reading" or Godlogic making lesbiano say "Jesus is Yahweh"

Azza 的头像
Azza7 天前

this is retarded muhammad is not the one sitting next to god its jesus muhammad is dead in the grave jesus isnt jesus is coming back to judge muhammad isnt...

Only 的头像
Only7 天前

How is this a rebuttal? This is a ReBUTTal like Al Butt of your prophet

LGP4A 的头像
LGP4A7 天前

Jesus is the Son of Man.

7h3cr1ms0nfckr 的头像
7h3cr1ms0nfckr7 天前

Daniel 7 doesn't have anything to do with Islam.

Ahraz 的头像
Ahraz6 天前

It has everything to do with it actually

7h3cr1ms0nfckr 的头像
7h3cr1ms0nfckr6 天前

Nothing to do with Mohammed. Dipshit didn't make one sound argument to support his point.

Melkisedet 的头像
Melkisedet7 天前

Inbreeding and pedophilia have very bad argument

bander 的头像
bander7 天前

They deadass translated his name to hide it

Objective Christian 的头像
Objective Christian6 天前

is proof that Islam is for weak-minded men and the brainwashed women they enslave. So, citing Ehrman eh? You mean the atheist who doesn't believe in God, rejects any form of validity for the Quran, and maintains the Bible is excellently preserved in spite of insignificant changes? Is THIS the Bart Ehrman you mean????? 🤣😆🫵

相关视频