Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

(SOUND WARNING) David King deepthroats Dwight Fairfield | C⭕MMISSION both models by RysXXX🔞 (COMISSIONS CLOSED) ! "Midwich Library (DBD version)" ported by Licht_57 on Open3DLab sound work by 🌱🐻 Negi Bear 🐻🌱 (CUMMS OPEN) c⭕missioned by anon :3 if u want animation for urself - DM me yes yes

72,588 просмотров • 11 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Full conversation on how Sehun addresses his EXO hyungs~ 🐧 Also, Sehunnie… 🐰 and Kai… 🐧 and Kai… 🐰 are the same age but he (Kai) started going to school early. 🐧 He started going to school early. 🗣️ Ah~ I see, so Sehunnie isn’t the only maknae then? Jongin is the maknae too in that case! 🐻 But Sehunnie is the true maknae. Because there is school after all! We went to the same high school. When I was in 12th grade, he was only in 11th grade in the same school. But as the years go by now, I have come to realise that it doesn’t really matter anymore. And to be honest, even if I wish to become a hyung… Because I have to be treated like a hyung to actually be regarded as one. 🗣️ ㅋㅋㅋ 🐻 I can only become a hyung when the other person calls me as such. 🐥 Hahaha~ (⊼⌔⊼) 🗣️ ㅋㅋㅋ Right, that’s right~ Just like the phrase “when the husband sings, the wife follows” [T/N: A metaphor to describe a harmonious and cooperative relationship between husband and wife, where the wife supports and follows the husband's lead], it takes two hands to clap. 🐻 Yeah, you need that to make it work. But because it didn’t, so we’re both like same-aged friends now! 🗣️ So does Sehunnie not reach out (to call you “hyung”)? 🐻 He really always tries to dodge it. He’s always dodging it~ But the important thing is that Sehunnie doesn’t call all of the members “hyung”. 🗣 Ah, so does Sehun-ssi kind of…give off the vibe like he’s really the one calling the shots? 🐥 *shakes his head* 🙂‍↔️ 🗣️ Why, why, why? 🐥 It’s a misunderstanding, simply a misunderstanding~ The hyungs always do this only when we’re on variety shows~ Just to be funny! 🐧 Hey, what do you mean we’re just trying to be funny? I really mean it! You’re spouting nonsense right now. 🐥 No, do I not call you “hyung”? 🐧 You do, but! So he does call us “hyung” now, but… 🍒 No, the nuance is what’s important~ The nuance~ 🗣️ Please try calling him that once here then~ 🐥 But I call him by his nickname! I have my own nickname for him… He’s Doh Kyungsoo but I call him Doh Kyungja~ 🗣️ ㅋㅋㅋ 🐥 Doh Kyungja~ 🐧 But where on earth did you get that Doh Kyungja from? 🐥 I came up with it~ 🐧 Right~ 🐥 Doh Kyungja~ Kyungja sounds nice, right? 🗣️ So do you call him “Kyungja hyung”then? 🐥 No, (I call him) Doh Kyungja. 🐰 Just Doh Kyungja. 🗣️ ㅋㅋㅋ 🐧 Told you he doesn’t add the “hyung”. 🗣️ Ah, there’s no (hyung)~ Ah, he’s dodged it~ 🐻 That’s right! He dodged it perfectly~ 🐧 And as for Suho hyung, he calls him Kim Junmyeon a lot, right? 🍒 Kim Junmyeon~ 🐧 Just those 3 words. Kim Junmyeon~ 🍒 He will go like, “Where is Kim Junmyeon!” 🐧 Ah, I think that’s really what he calls him the most? 🍒 I think he does say, “Where is Kim Junmyeon!” the most~ “Where is Kim Junmyeon!” 🗣 So what do you call your Chanyeol hyung then? 🐥 Well, I don’t have a separate nickname for hyung… 🍒 He doesn’t have a nickname for me! And doesn’t call me “hyung”either! Just, well… 🗣 Does he just ignore you then? ㅋㅋㅋ 🐥 *waves hand in disagreement* (⊼⌔⊼ )👋🏻 🍒 He just calls me by using hand gestures or some specific kind of sounds… 🗣 ㅋㅋㅋ Isn’t that what you would do when you call your puppy at home? 🍒 You don’t even call your puppy like that. You’d still call your puppy by their names… 🐧 Do you see this, hyung? Do you see the food portion sizes right now? Chanyeollie is the one who served us, right? 🗣 Yes, yes~ 🐧 Do you see this? *points at Sehun’s generous amount of food* 🍲 🗣️ ㅋㅋㅋ 🐻 His is different~ 🐧 His is indeed different~ 🍒 I thought that if I did it like this, he would at least call me by my name… Because I really wish for him to call me by my name~ 🗣 ㅋㅋㅋ Ah, not just by sounds? 🍒 Yeah~ 🗣 Please call him that once coolly, without hesitation~ 🐥 Chanyeol hyung… 🍒 *smiles and nods* I’m Chanyeol for today~ 🐻 You felt kind of awkward saying it too, right? 🐥 But it did feel awkward… ㅋㅋㅋ 🐰 Your “Chanyeol hyung” sounded kind of awkward~ 🍒 Well, at least he didn’t swear~

언제나세훈이편 ❄️

57,534 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

I got rejected by 144 investors before raising $150M for my $200M+ rev/year startup. After 144 rejections, I started questioning our approach. Were we solving the right problem? What were we doing wrong? Why weren’t investors seeing what we were seeing? Were we the right team to build this? We tried everything: different pitch angles, new deck structures, and reframing the problem. Then came the 145th meeting, where we closed our first growth round. That yes made everything worth it. But getting there took years of mistakes and hard work. We went through a lot of trial and error just to figure out what resonates with investors. We tried dozens of approaches to figure out what made investors engage. Some landed, most didn't. But each iteration taught us something about what builds conviction versus what just sounds good on paper. And once we cracked that code, our Series C closed faster than expected. And today, I see so many founders in the exact same position I was in 10 years ago: grinding through rejections, questioning everything, and trying to figure out what works. So today I want to give you the resource I wish I had back then: Something that shows you exactly how to structure these conversations and navigate the entire process (because the fundraising cycle can be a big distraction and take a toll on you as a founder). So I've partnered with Notion's Startups Team to create the essential fundraising resource that helps you avoid the mistakes that cost me years. Here's what you are getting: • The actual decks I used to raise $150M for Super[.]com (Series B, C) • 50 real examples from funded startups like Eleven Labs and Artisan AI • A searchable database of 10,000+ investors - angels, VCs, and accelerators you can reach out to immediately (this alone would take months to build manually) • An AI-powered fundraising agent built into Notion with step-by-step prompts (no separate ChatGPT needed) Want access? • Like and share this post • Comment "FUNDRAISE" • Follow me so I can DM you the link I'll send it over ASAP. P.S.: If you are serious about fundraising (now or in the future), you should grab it right away.

Henry Shi

561,310 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Thank you Centre Pompidou Centre Pompidou, everyone who made Nature Manifesto happen, and all the people that took it in. We were happy to see the conversations that the use of AI in Nature Manifesto sparked !! Below is a message from Björk: ~~~ “ the flood of all things from AI is overwhelming !! i am super grateful for your concerns about it´s effects on the environment , it shows you care , are curious and have integrity . i am curious too , i would like to be more informed about the difference of "frugal" AI and the ones that do hugeenvironmental damage and want to be able to choose . i asked around and found out that both the visuals and the audio in our pompidou project were done with "frugal" AI . but i have a lot to learn . when we used some of the AI softwares to merge the animals voices to mine , some of the sounds were great but to be honest , the best blends of their voices and a human were done "manually" , me editing the sounds , choosing piece by piece , looking for personality , musicality and soul . with new technology , i try to use it as a tool to grow , not a crutch . for example when i used melodyne , i used it not for lazy voice progressions but spent even more time when using it . every note in every chord became intentionally more complex . ( for example choir in "thunderbolt" ) and hopefully stretched the potential more out , further than i would have in "normal analog" physical improvisations ... i felt with this new tool i could reach new places in my musical DNA , become MORE personal . more myself . in my opinion , this is how we will work in the future . humans can read emotions on an incredibly high scale . nature made us that way . if there is no soul in tomorrow's music made by AI it is because no-one put it there and we have to speak out and guard this as listeners . ( tbh there is a lot of soulless muzak on spotify already ... they don’t need any AI help for that ...) anything that is mass manufactured without the attention of creativity , is that way . AI or not so it is not about the tool it is what you do with it . " ~~~ The visuals for Nature Manifesto were crafted by the talented Sam Balfus, artificial intelligence being one of the multiple tools used in the process. The sound was produced in collaboration with artist Robin Meier and IRCAM IRCAM. IRCAM develops “frugal AI” capable of generating audio in real-time on local servers without a GPU, thus their models can f.ex. be embedded on tiny Raspberry Pi cards. We asked associate professor and researcher Philippe Esling to provide us with readings; Constance Douwe’s thesis “On the environmental impact of deep generative models for audio” and more, see links below. Nature Manifesto Immersive sound piece 3’40” (2024) 20 November to 9 December, 2024, Centre Pompidou, Paris. Presented as part of the forum “Biodiversity: Which culture for which future?” #ForumBiodiversité Concept and words by Björk & Aleph Music written and composed by Björk Curatorship: Chloé Siganos and Aleph Molinari Associate curator: Delphine Le Gatt Ircam Musical Computing: Robin Meier Wiratunga Sound engineer: Bergur Þórisson Animation: Sam Balfua Video editing: Santiago Molinari With activists: Camille Etienne, Claire Nouvian, Sigrun Perla Gísladóttir, Sæunn Júlía Sigurjónsdóttir, Titouan Pilliard, of BLOOM, Sustainable Ocean Alliance, and Ungir umhverfissinnar. In partnership with D&B Audio and Southby Productions. Reccommended resources :

björk

54,602 просмотров • 1 год назад

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

575,206 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

WILLIAMEST PRESSTOUR #WilliamEstFanconPressTour #Flex1045xWilliamEstFANCON 🎤: was there ever a moment when you were deeply touched by something he did but never told him? 🦈: actually, i can think of two things: one work-related and one personal. on the personal side, ever since we first met during songkran last year, i was out partying, right? and i went to sleep at his place. at the time, he couldn’t go out yet cause he wasn’t of age. but like, it was 3 a.m. and he still came down to pick me up even though he had already gone to sleep. and we had just met. i felt really touched. 🎸: at the time we went out together and i wasn’t old enough to go party, so i just went to some place that kids could go in during the day. then i went home to sleep and phi went out partying. 🦈: yes and i didn’t just stay for one night. i stayed like three nights, didn’t even book a hotel, just stayed at nong place. 🎸: and my eyes were like 😵‍💫 🦈: i started to feel bad. do you know what i did in return? 🤣 🎤: what did you do? 🎸: no, because i had to go downstairs, press the elevator, do a bunch of stuff, so i had to wake up. i went down to pick him up and he was just sitting there on the floor 🤣 🎤: sitting on the floor waiting? 🎸: yes, just sitting and resting there, waiting for me to come down. so we went back up. help him upstairs. not that i helped him up, he could walk by himself 🤣 then i went to bed and from my room, if the door wasn’t fully closed, you could see the sink. i’m the type who eats and washes dishes later. 🎤: you soak them first so they’re easier to clean later? 🎸: yes and then i saw him standing there at 3 a.m. doing the dishes 😭 🎤: washing dishes at 3 a.m.? 🎸: yes 😭 i was like, why did he do that? like it was fine, seriously. it wasn’t a big deal. but maybe he felt a bit guilty or something. but for me, i literally set an alarm, like, “okay, he’ll probably be back around this time,” so i set it and went down to get him. 🎤: maybe that was his version of saying thank you, right? 🦈: yes and the thing is, he never even told me that he saw me! like, i knew he’d probably fallen asleep or something, so i left the door cracked open because the lights were off just in case he could see. and yeah, turns out he did see. but he only told me months later, like way after songkran. 🎤: so he only just revealed now that he saw you washing the dishes? 🦈: i only found out because he teased me later, like, “you’ll end up washing dishes again soon” 🤣 that was how he teased. and back then i genuinely felt a bit bad, so i just wanted to do something to give back a little. and looking back, it’s so funny. 🦈: and then in thamepo, there was literally a dishwashing scene, so i joked like, “guess i can’t escape doing dishes for real.” 🤣

𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑎 ◡̈

73,933 просмотров • 1 год назад

Woot woot! THE BIG DAY IS HERE. Eddie AI v2! Download it: It’s been a sprint pace to cover a marathon distance. We launched Eddie AI v1 in October last year. Thousands of new users. Lots of feature requests. Learned a ton. (Yes, Paul Graham is right: ship early and often!) Eddie AI v2 releases three big advancements. And underpinning those decisions are the learnings baked in. 1. Eddie now runs locally on Macs and Windows. Our native apps are out of beta and available to everyone. Video is large. The video files used by video professionals are even larger. No one wants to wait around uploading. Native applications make it MUCH MUCH faster to import and thus much faster to get on with editing. One of the challenges with Eddie is how do we *quickly* get the user to aha – that moment where they can see the magic of this assistant AI video editor – if it takes awhile to upload files. These native applications are a big step towards getting to aha, swiftly, and help deliver on our promise to save customers time. 2. Analyze raw footage, aka logging interviews and B-rolls. Eddie v1 only created edits. But users were asking for a step before the edit too. They want their footage logged – what happened in this shot, who said what, etc – and grouped logically with this metadata back in their video editing application. We released a test of this a month ago. Users were blown away by the accuracy of the AI, the rich descriptions, and how the metadata seamlessly is sent to their video editing application where they can find the right shot when they need. We were blown away by the usage of this feature. Logging is now updated and released to all in v2. 3. Rough cut mode. This is the big dream: Eddie is the AI assistant video editor. There’s a lot of tedious work in video editing. Eddie takes it on. And helps you get to a great story faster. Sorting through hours of interviews and finding great soundbites that can be cut together to form a coherent story is a big step toward this dream. We attempted to do this in v1. But the prompt box was too open ended. People were typing in things like “Cut me a great story” and the subjectivity of the statement led to variable results. So we re-thought the story crafting process. We added friction. YES you read that correctly. We added friction into the product that slows the customer down. BUT they get much better results, reliably. And that trade-off is well worth it. Eddie now takes a step-by-step approach with you on crafting your story. It aligns with you on the story framework and then cuts chapter by chapter with your feedback. What used to take days, now takes minutes. We spent months hacking at LLMs to make them able to provide coherent edits over a longer duration and handle a large amount of source material (aka context-window problem). It’s ready for release. Version 2.0 is here. Download Eddie at

Shamir Allibhai

57,672 просмотров • 1 год назад

Matthew Gallagher Built a $401M Company in Year One with 2 People. And the tool behind it? Claude Code. This year he's on track for $1.8B. Sam Altman predicted this. It's happening now. The problem? It costs money. API credits stack up. Monthly bills keep growing. Every prompt eats your budget. Every project drains your wallet faster. Until now. Two methods. 99% cheaper. One is completely free. Forever. $0. Not a trial. This video breaks down both step by step. ↓ Let me put this in perspective. $100-$500. That's monthly. That's what you spend. That's $6,000/year on API credits. Just to use a tool you haven't shipped anything with. The $401M guy? Spending $0. Same capability. Shipping weekly. Different cost structure. Different results. Different life. I'm about to hand you his cost structure for free. ↓ Open source vs closed source. Pay attention. Closed source: Claude. GPT-4. Pay per token. Meter always running. Open source: Qwen. Llama. Mistral. Free to download. Free to run. Free forever. No meter. No tokens. No bill. Here's what nobody tells you: 80% of coding tasks? Open source handles them. More than handles them. Writes clean code. Debugs errors. Generates boilerplate. Handles routine work perfectly. You're paying premium prices for tasks that don't need premium intelligence. That's hiring a brain surgeon to put on a bandaid. Smart play: Free models for the 80%. Paid credits for the 20%. That's what the $401M guy does. That's what this video teaches you. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns that turn free tools into real businesses. ↓ Method 1: Ollama. Local. Free. Forever. Download it. Pull a model. Point Claude Code at it. Done. No internet needed. No API keys required. No monthly subscription. No token counting ever. No bill. Today. Tomorrow. Ever. Your data never leaves your computer. Complete privacy. Complete freedom. Claude Code thinks it's talking to the cloud. It's talking to your laptop. For $0. The video walks through every step: Every config file. Every variable. Every command. Every click. If you can follow a recipe, you can do this. People who set this up 3 months ago? Saved $300-$1,500 since then. Workflow didn't change one bit. ↓ Hardware you need: 16GB RAM: 7B models run smooth. 32GB RAM: 32B models run comfortable. 64GB + GPU: biggest models available. No GPU? Still works. Just slower. Few extra seconds. That's it. Your $1,500 laptop is sitting there running Chrome and Spotify. Put it to work saving you $200/month instead. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns that turn free tools into real businesses. ↓ Method 2: Open Router. Free Cloud. No Hardware. Weak machine? Don't want local setup? This method is for you. Free AI models in the cloud. No download. No hardware. Configure Claude Code to route through Open Router. The config: Base URL: Open Router API. API key: free Open Router key. Default Sonnet: free. Default Opus: free. Default Haiku: free. Small fast model: free. Subagent model: free. Free. Free. Free. Free. Free across the board. Same interface. Same commands. Same workflow. Zero cost. Copy the config from the video. Paste it. Save $200/month. Starting today. Right now. ↓ When to use which: Ollama (local): Best for privacy. Best for offline work. Best for unlimited usage. Best if you have decent hardware. Open Router (cloud): Best for weak machines. Best for instant setup. Best for trying different models. Best if you don't want to manage anything. Both methods: Best for 80% of your daily work. Still use paid Claude for: Complex architecture. Multi-file refactoring. Deep reasoning tasks. The 20% that actually needs it. $20/month instead of $200/month. Same output. 90% less cost. ↓ The math that should make you angry. You (current): $200-$500/month. $2,400-$6,000/year. $7,200-$18,000 over 3 years. You (after this video): $20-$50/month. $240-$600/year. $720-$1,800 over 3 years. Savings over 3 years: $6,480-$16,200. That's a used car. That's seed money. That's 6 months of rent. All from one 25-minute video. All from 15 minutes of configuration. Highest ROI 25 minutes you'll spend this year. ↓ The limitations. I won't lie to you. Open source is not Opus. Not as smart on complex reasoning. Not as good at long-context tasks. Makes more mistakes on nuanced problems. But they are: Free. Capable. Getting better monthly. Good enough for 80% of daily work. Smart cost management isn't being cheap. It's being strategic. Expensive tool when it matters. Free tool when it doesn't. ↓ The one-person billion-dollar company is coming. $401M in year one proved it's possible. The building blocks: AI that codes: Claude Code. Way to run it free: this video. Distribution: the internet. Customers: everyone. Only missing ingredient? Someone who builds. Not reads about building. Not saves posts about building. Not bookmarks videos about building. Builds. Tools are free. Knowledge is free. Opportunity is screaming. You're still "thinking about it." ↓ Your action plan: Tonight: Watch the video. Tomorrow morning: Set up Ollama or Open Router. Tomorrow afternoon: Build something. Anything. This week: Build a second thing. Faster. This month: Charge someone for it. One video. One setup. One weekend. $0 cost. Unlimited potential. Or keep paying $200/month for something you could get free. Keep consuming instead of building. Keep planning instead of shipping. Matthew Gallagher didn't plan a $401M company. He built it. Full video attached. Every method. Every config. Every tradeoff. 25 minutes. Your move. Follow Himanshu Kumar for more breakdowns that turn free tools into real businesses.

Himanshu Kumar

13,677 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Qinwen Zheng after coming back from 0-5 in the 3rd set & saving match point to beat Madison Keys at the U.S. Open Qinwen: “I have to say Madison played amazing. I don’t feel like she got up to 5-0 because I played so bad, I just think she played amazing. I kept telling myself keep holding every single point. Never give up. Stay there. And somehow little by little it just happened. Finally one time a bit of luck is on my side. I’m so happy. I know in the last match she also did that, turned the match around. It’s not bad. I also did that once as well. This is the first time I turned it around from 0-5. Usually before it’s always 1-5 or 2-5. It was a very dramatic match for me. But we both showed really strong tennis. Thank you for the crowd who came to support us today. Doesn’t matter if you supported Madi or me. Thank you so much.” ❤️ “Do you feel like you’re close to being back to your best now after the elbow surgery?” Qinwen: “Well yes, I just enjoyed so much to play here. It’s like, I enjoy to fight here every day. After the surgery wasn’t easy. It felt like I lost my energy on the tennis court. I’ve been through really tough times these 3, 4, 5 months. But luckily thanks to my team we’ve been working really hard at IMG academy after Toronto. The hard work pays off finally a bit. I want to say thanks to my team for bringing me here. Let’s keep going. I never give up during the match. That’s the positive thing right now.” ❤️

The Tennis Letter

57,162 просмотров • 28 дней назад

David Sacks: “FDA for AI” is fake news, but here’s why it’s making headlines @jason: “ Who's leading Trump down the path of regulation and creating this AI FDA?” David Sacks: “I think there's several things going on here. The first one is, there's a lot of fake news. This whole idea of an FDA for AI, I don't think any senior official supports it. Certainly, I don't think that's the way the president thinks about these issues. He's the most pro-innovation president we've ever had. And the White House Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, just put out a statement last night that I think pretty much shoots this down. Second, there's another thing going on, which is a straw manning of what the Trump administration did on AI in its first year. In the same way that they want to spin this FDA for AI, they're also trying to spin what we did as this completely laissez-faire attitude, where there'd be no regulations whatsoever, nor guardrails. It's a way of criticizing what we did. They're trying to portray it as unsafe. In fact, if you look, on March 20th, the White House released a national AI regulatory framework in which we put out a four-page bulleted list of legislation that we would support. So we have not been against every conceivable regulation or every conceivable law, we just believe that there should be specific solutions to specific problems, as opposed to a giant power grab by Washington that would squash innovation. Point number three is, there is a legitimate thing happening here with, let's call it Mythos or cyber. Within 3-6 months, all the major frontier labs, including Chinese models, will have cyber capabilities. In response to that, we do need there to be a hardening of systems, and we do need there to be a scanning of codebases to find these vulnerabilities and patch them before the hackers do it. Because the hackers will have these capabilities in a matter of months. That's a certainty. So we do need a response to that. Now, my view on what should that response be, first of all, we should want the government and the private sector to work cooperatively, and I think they are. What we should be doing, I think, is getting these tools, Mythos, and then the OpenAI model, and others like it, in the hands of our cybersecurity industry. And by the way, not just the public companies like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, although certainly they're two of the most noteworthy, but there's also some incredibly strong startups on the way up. We need to get these tools into their hands as quickly as possible because they're a force multiplier for all the companies out there that aren't that good at cybersecurity, they can use these companies as vendors. And just one last point on this whole thing is, both Anthropic and OpenAI acted responsibly here. No one was trying to release these super powerful models. So in a way, all the people who are saying that we need pre-release approvals for models, they're trying to solve a problem that didn't exist. Yes, we do have this cyber issue, but that is a problem that we will solve over the next six months. What they're trying to do is use that issue to try and create a permanent new infrastructure in Washington. The classic 'never let a crisis go to waste' strategy.”

The All-In Podcast

150,106 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Dear David Coltart, WHY I CANNOT SUPPORT QUINTUPLE C: COLTART, CHAMISA AND CCC My attention has been drawn to your fraudulent and disgusting tweet you posted on my Twitter TL yesterday David, in which you quoted a tweet I posted four years ago on 22 January 2019 in memory of my father. I reproduce below both tweets for ease of reference: “I have always genuinely sympathized with you Jonathan - the loss of your father in such circumstances must be devastating. I just don’t understand why you continue to side with the party which brought such suffering to your family, and which still brings so much suffering.” – Tweet by David Coltart, 30 July 2023; commenting on my tweet below I posted four years ago: “1/5 On 22 January 1983 my father, Melusi Job Mlevu, was callously murdered in Tsholotsho by gukurahundi soldiers & the CIO. They tortured him upon his arrest & in front of his family; got him to dig a shallow grave, tortured him again; pumped bullets into his body & buried him!” – Jonathan Moyo tweet posted on 22 January 2019. Now David, are you really serious that you “have always genuinely sympathised with me”, because of “the loss of [my] father in such circumstances”? And since there’s no strategic ambiguity about the meaning of “always”, as it means exactly what it says, how have you “always genuinely” expressed your sympathy over all the years, since knowing about the circumstances under which I lost my father? The fact that your tweet yesterday is a response to a tweet I posted a long four years ago on 22 January 2019 – in memory of my father who was murdered by the Fifth Brigade in Tsholotsho on 22 January 1983 – shows and proves that you’re a fraud and a charlatan with neither sensitivity towards me and my family nor respect for us as Africans and human beings. All told, and typically of Zimbabweans of British colonial extraction and in particular of soul-free Rhodies, you’re contemptuous of our culture as a family and as Africans. You see David, it is fraudulent and utterly disgusting of you to claim that you have ever sympathised with me over my father’s loss. It’s actually patronising and very insulting in the extreme. Your fraud is clear even to yourself, that’s why you did not express your so-called sympathy when I first posted my tweet on 22 January 2019 in memory of my father who was murdered on 22 January 1983. In fact, until your fraudulent tweet yesterday, you had never before expressed any genuine or even non genuine sympathy for me and my family regarding the loss of my father on 22 January 1983. Even fools will immediately see that the key sentence in your tweet yesterday is not about your cruel declaration of fraudulent sympathy for me and my family over the circumstances of my father’s loss, a loss my family commemorated this year not yesterday but seven months ago on 22 January 2023, with no tweet of sympathy from you. The sentence in your tweet yesterday that captures what you really foolishly communicating to me is this: “I just don’t understand why you continue to side with the party which brought such suffering to your family, and which still brings so much suffering.” David: what I say, believe and do is without exception based on and an existential product of what I know, what I think and what I have experienced or lived. I never say, believe or do anything that I don’t know, don’t, I have not thought of or which I don’t believe. Now David, you pretend to be a democrat who believes in the rule of law as enshrined in the Constitution, so, what business of yours is my choice of what side to support or to not support in politics? Are my freedom of conscience and my right to make political choices freely now subject to your understanding, or are they my constitutional rights, as they are for every Zimbabwean, in terms of sections 60 and 67 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe? Are you aware David and do you understand that the Constitution in 67(1)(b) says every Zimbabwean citizen has the right “to make political choices freely”? And, David, are you aware that section 60 of the Constitution says every person, not just every Zimbabwean but every person, has the right to freedom of conscience which includes “freedom of thought, opinion, religion or belief”, and “freedom to practice and propagate and give expression to their thought, opinion, religion or belief, whether in public or in private and whether alone or together with others”. The fact that you quoted and abused my personal tweet I posted on 22 January 2019 in memory of my father who was brutally murdered by the Fifth Brigade on 22 January 1983 to say you “don’t understand why you [me] continue to side with the party which brought such suffering to your [my] family, and which still brings so much suffering”; shows that you are either ignorant of sections 60 and 67 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, and proves that you are a fraud and a charlatan with no constitutional values. Why do you want to police my freedom of conscience and my right to make my political choices freely? Just why do you and your lot in CCC, think that you can interfere with my freedom of conscience and my right to my political choices that are guaranteed to me by the Constitution of Zimbabwe? If you and your lot were genuine democratic change champions, as you claim and purport to be, you would be the first to understand and to propagate freedom of conscience and the right to make political choices freely as sacrosanct constitutional values and principles that must be respected for every Zimbabwean at all times. But this has not been possible because you are frauds and charlatans. Now, your attitude towards me, the one captured in the disgusting tweet you posted yesterday, leads me to conclude without any fear of being contradicted that you are a frivolous and stupid person, David. Otherwise, if you care to know, there are three months that are cruel to me. October in which I lost my daughter Zanele in 2015, November because of what happened to me, my family and some colleagues during the 2017 military coup – it was also on 11 November 1965 that Rhodesia under which you blossomed, unilaterally declared independence – and 22 January the dark day on which my father was murdered. These are traumatic days for me in the calendar year. You see, I was a student in California in the US when my father was murdered by the Fifth Brigade in cold blood on 22 January 1983, having gone to the US before independence in 1977. When this awful tragedy happened, I did not know who my father was. I was born when my mother was barely 16 years old, and I was raised by my maternal grandparents who, like my mother, did not want me to know who my father was for reasons best known to them. Although, as I grew up, I understood their position from our cultural perspective as Africans, it nevertheless profoundly pained me. Truth be told, I was most grateful and I still am to this day, that my grandfather was a great father and my grandmother a great mother to me in ways that made me who I am today. I got to know who my father was well after I had graduated with my doctorate in 1988 and long after his gruesome murder, about which I was first told only 10 years ago. Since then, while it's been a profound rebirth for me to connect with my father through the loving Mlevu clan at large, I owe my dear sister Simiso an existential debt of gratitude. Through her, my kids have a hand-holder gateway through which to know about their grandfather. I really thank God and the spirit of the Mlevu clan for Simiso. The fact that I was born on 12 January, and that my father was brutally murdered on 22 January, makes the month of January an unbearable time of anguish for me, more so given that my father and I never met in life. When four years ago on 22 January 2019 I posted the tweet that you abused yesterday with reckless abandon, as you exposed your disconnection from the African experience, I was existentially troubled by the worst that could have happened to me and to my family on 15 November 2017, which got me thinking about what happened to my father, and even more troubling against the backdrop of the events of November 2017, I was devastated by the fact that I never met my father, and I spent the better part of 22 January 2019 wondering what life could have been for me had I known him in life and grown up under his parental care and guidance. You see David, maybe this is not true of people of European ancestry like you but, for many Africans it is very common for kids to be raised by their grandparents, like I was. As things turned out, I grew up knowing many such kids as my peers, the majority of whom never got to know who fathered them, some of whom are leading very successful lives in society as you read this. Unlike them, I was fortunate to end up knowing who my father was, but I was unfortunate not to have met him, and even more unfortunate to have known of him long after his death, made worse by the tragic circumstances of that death. I do not have a fly by night connection with Zanu PF. When I finished my high school in California, I proceeded to university there for my undergraduate education on a scholarship I got through Zanu PF. While an undergraduate, I was the political commissar of the Zanu PF branch in Los Angeles. I did my masters and doctoral degrees with academic scholarships endorsed by Zanu PF and underwritten by the Government of Zimbabwe through a staff development programme at the University of Zimbabwe. Having gone through Mgagao run by Zanu PF, and having gotten university education to the highest level under the auspices of Zanu PF, I have a long history and experience with Zanu PF, and with Zanu PF people whose complexities define who I am as an adult Zimbabwean, for better or for worse. It's my history, I'm proud of it and I own it. It’s an inescapable truth that each individual, and each therefore each person has a unique existential history best known to himself or herself, family and to a small cohort that has been intimate parts of that personal history. It's hopelessly foolish for someone to hope to prescribe a history on anyone. Every human being is who they are. And it's a fact not exclusive to me that my association with Zanu PF has not always been rosy. Life is a personal struggle between the person or the individual and the social formations through which life goes on. It’s common cause, that the military coup was a traumatic experience for me and my family and that it was profoundly painful and life changing in untold ways. It’s also common cause and not surprising to any normal human being that I blamed Zanu PF for that traumatic experience. Anyone else in my situation would have done the same at point or another. Yet the bigger story is that I, my family and my colleagues survived that 2017 ordeal with the very direct, active and truly genuine assistance and support from Zanu PF people. Working with other African Angeles, and I emphasize African Angeles, it was Zanu PF people who made sure that we were able to be safe and to get out of the country to be where I am today, all of them at great risk to their lives or livelihoods. In 2017 I was saved to be alive today by Zanu PF people. During the life threatening 2017 ordeal that my family and I went through, there was not even one person associated with the opposition as it was then, or as it is today, who reached out to find out where I was or how I was doing. It is common cause, some of it is documented, that many in the opposition then and who are still in opposition today, actually wanted me dead, all because of my political differences with them. You David Coltart, who now wants to pretend that you “have always genuinely sympathised with me”, never inquired after me. That’s why I think you are a monumental fraud and a charlatan. I repeat, I was helped out of the traumatic ordeal in 2017 by Zanu PF people, not by anyone from your lot David, not even one. Of course, at some point and largely because of the 2018 general election I found myself connected with some of your lot, especially Nelson Chamisa and others who were close to him or working with him i the election campaign, as the MDC-A presidential election candidate. I will not rehash that story here, as it has been told very well by many others. From my experience, and the lessons I have extrapolated from the late Vice President Joshua Nkomo, such as on the attached video clip, I have come to better appreciate that it is a mistake and wrong to a understand and define a political party with a deep-seated background and history like Zanu PF in terms of its leadership; rather, a grounded political party with a long history is necessarily defined by its founding values, constitution and membership, not least because the membership is permanent while the leadership comes and goes. By the same token, I have come to better appreciate that the mistakes or excesses of the leadership of grounded political parties with an entrenched history should not automatically or reflexively be ascribed or attributed to or blamed on the membership. On 15 November 2022, Patrick Zhuwao and I wrote an open letter to Zanu PF members to precisely make this point. I am attaching herewith a link to that letter, lest you missed it. It’s a self-explanatory letter which contextualises and explains everything that I did and said between 15 November 2017 and 14 November 2022. It also explains why do not support Nelson Chamisa and your CCC. I stand by the contents of that letter. In this connection, I draw your attention and that of your lot to an interview done by the late VP Joshua Nkomo in 1983 – which is attached herewith as already mentioned – in which Nkomo explains why the Fifth Brigade was not a Shona issue. Although Nkomo made it clear that gukurahundi was a political and not a tribal issue, I have come to understand and appreciate that it was a political issue not in the sense of Zanu PF as a political party in membership terms but, rather, in the sense of the political leadership and, more particularly, of individuals within that leadership. However, given your utter contempt for sections 60 and 67 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, I do not expect you to understand the dangers of painting a tribe or a political party with one brush, or to understand the misguided consequences of conflating the leadership of a political party with the party’s membership or even of treating the leadership of a political party as a monolithic formation that always acts in concert. Basically David, and just like Nelson Chamisa’s trolls, it's clear you believe that you can abuse my personal and tragic circumstances to blackmail me for your doomed political purposes in two ways. First, you think you can abuse the circumstances of my father’s brutal death to somehow generate cheap and outrageous propaganda for yourself, Nelson Chamisa and CCC that I support Zanu PF which killed my father, and you do this under your self-indulgent presumption that everyone who is in Zanu PF as a political party is murderous by definition. Second, and based on this falsification, you’re abusing my tragic personal circumstances regarding my father’s loss to blackmail me into supporting you in particular, given my attack on your imposition as CCC's Ward 4 councillor candidate in Bulawayo; Nelson Chamisa and CCC . Your outrageous position is that if I cannot support you, I must keep quiet about you, under the ridiculous presumption that you’re all by definition virtuous, competent, capable, the only and best democratic alternative for everyone in Zimbabwe. On the back of sections 60 and 67 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe and drawing from my knowledge, thoughts, experiences and received wisdom from the late VP Joshua Nkomo, I have dealt with your self-indulgent presumption that Zanu PF is a monolithic formation with undifferentiated leadership and membership structures, in which you take everyone in it to be murderous by definition. In light of the fact that you invited this intervention by your disgusting and intrusive tweet you posted yesterday, and because we are age mates, I conclude my rejoinder to your offensive tweet by telling you what I think about you, about Nelson Chamisa and about CCC. David, as a former member of the Rhodesian security services which were murderous and which committed unspeakable atrocities across Zimbabwe and beyond its borders into Zambia and Mozambique, you have no moral authority to pontificate about human rights or anything of the sort. You David Coltart operated in Matabeleland where you did dastardly things, some of which you narrate in your autobiography and many of which you will take to your grave untold, because you never faced a commission of inquiry to be grilled under oath about your service in the Rhodesian security services. The fact that a person like you has remained active in Zimbabwean public affairs for 43 years since independence is a huge credit to our national politics because, with your background in the Rhodesian security services, you would not have survived this long in public life elsewhere. It’s mind boggling that Chamisa has imposed you to run for Ward 4 councillor in Bulawayo, after you were resoundingly defeated in your party’s Ward 4 community candidate selection caucus in which you were clobbered and you came a distant last among the contestants. Thanks to your being power hungry, you have made it possible for everyone to see that you’re a fake democrat and a charlatan who believes in the imposition of candidates. Your criticism of what you say is Zanu PF's undemocratic practices is hollow and hypocritical. Furthermore, it’s shocking is that Chamisa is bent on imposing you from Harare as Bulawayo mayor. You don’t qualify for that position not least because you do not speak the language of the local community in Bulawayo despite having been born there 66 years ago. Unlike Members of Parliament or Senators, whose chambers conduct their business mainly in English, Councillors and Mayors work in the local languages of their local communities. For the above reasons, and as an expression of my freedom of conscience and my right to make my political choices freely, I do not and cannot support you at all David. As for Chamisa, having worked closely with him between 2018 and 2021, I came to the settled conclusion in November 2021 that he is a dictator with a very dangerous God complex, in that he sees himself as having been chosen by God to lead Zimbabwe, and more ominously, he claims to have direct communication with God who has the last word on what he should do or say in public. In politics, that’s an unworkable Jim Jones proposition. Because of his God complex, Chamisa is visible only when there are elections as he was in the 2018 harmonised general election, March 2022 by-elections and now for the 23 August harmonised general election. After he ditched his supporters in August 2018 when he called them "ma stupids" [stupid people], in January 2019 and in July 2020, his unavailability to provide leadership when his supporters needed it triggered a viral political joke that: ‘in Zimbabwe there are three things that are unavailable when you need them the most, the UN, a condom and Nelson Chamisa’. But even more telling aboutChamisa is the shocking way in which he has used CCC since its formation in January 2022, and particularly in the party’s candidate selection for the forthcoming elections, to ruthlessly purge the opposition. It's been scary and it explains why the opposition in Zimbabwe today is the most clueless and the weakest since independence in 1980. How can a democratic change champion insist on running a political party with no constitution, no structures, no bank account and no accountability? I cannot support a leader like that. There’s nothing more dangerous in politics than, a young 'popular' dictator with a God complex. My conscience and freedom to political choices freely do not allow me to support a leader like that. As for CCC, it has no ideology, no values, no constitution, no structures, no bank account, no policies and no other visible office bearers besides Chamisa, Gift Siziva, Fadzayi Mahere and Amos Chibaya; and it has not been launched to boot. There’s just no way anywhere on earth that a political formation like that can be supported by rational people with rational expectations. That’s why I cannot side with you David or with Chamisa or with CCC. You’re not “the alternative”, you’re just a worse and more dangerous alternative which can only be supported by polticidal people who do not mind moving from the frying pan into the fire! Jonathan Moyo 31 July 2023

Prof Jonathan Moyo

181,926 просмотров • 3 лет назад

I realized that I would probably get more interest in my AI music theory tool (mtdt) and corresponding agent skill library if I did impressive things with more mainstream/popular tunes rather than an obscure Irish folk song from the 18th century like in my quoted post. So this time, I took my 3 favorite tunes from Zelda: Ocarina of Time (i.e., Saria's Song, the Song of Storms, and Zelda's Lullaby) and had them reimagined by the AI agent using my system in the style of various famous classical composers: Schubert, Schumann, Rachmaninoff, and Liszt. I had GPT-6 Astra xhigh acting as the "controller" agent create the prompt and launch another instance of Codex (the "worker" agent) in a fresh workspace with all 322 skills loaded, and then monitor the process. I gave the controller agent only very high-level instructions about which songs from the Zelda game I wanted and which composers to use for which songs. I also told it stuff like: "For actually rendering the written music to audio, we should use the nice concert piano instrument with reverb that came from my jazz chords project originally (see /cass) and we should humanize the playing with a skill so it doesn't sound robotic in tempo and dynamics; it should sound like a professional pianist specializing in the music of the particular composer. And try to do a final critical pass over each piece with fresh eyes looking for any deficiencies and blunders... does it REALLY sound like that composer's work? Can you still hear the original song's essence in the new, reimagined version? Is it good? Does it follow the rules and structure of music theory well, through the lens of that particular composer? If not, then FIX or IMPROVE those things (instruct the other agent to do so using its skills and the mtdt tool!)" --- But then the controller agent was in charge and handled managing the worker agent (which did nearly all of the actual labor of making the tracks). It's a bit counterintuitive that this creator-critic split would work better (why not just go directly to the agent doing the work?), but I sort of stumbled on it by accident because I didn't want to mess with my default agent skills and only wanted the 322 music theory skills to be visible to the worker agent. That's why I originally had the controller agent launch the other agent: to specify that. But then I realized that it's very handy to have an independent agent handling the details for me. It's sort of like a rich English aristocrat in the 1700s having an awesome butler to handle the rest of the household staff. Just tell the butler what you want in a kind of abbreviated shorthand and he will turn around and give very detailed instructions, monitor everything, and do quality control for you so you don't have to get into the nitty-gritty details so much. It gives you another set of eyes, even if it's using the exact same underlying LLM, and there's something about the gestalt shift of being a critic versus a creator that leads to better objectivity and honesty and, ultimately, better-quality results. Anyway, the first results made me realize that it had taken my instructions about being able to hear the original song clearly in the reimagined version too literally, so I told the controller agent: "It too directly has the entire original melody within it unaltered, which is jarring and not like . It's also too long; they should be closer to 1.5 to 2 minutes each. We don't need to start from scratch, but make sure you address those issues." That's about the extent of my feedback and iteration here. And to be clear, the original versions were pretty nice, too. I'll have some other fun demos coming out soon as well. Anyway, attached here are results from 4 composers as animated scores. You can also get the PDF of the complete scores here: So do they actually sound like those composers wrote them? It's sort of an impossible task, in that the style of the original melodies is really nothing like the styles of those composers. But within those constraints, I think it did a respectable job. If you're a fan of that Zelda music and like classical music you will probably get a kick out of these. I'm positive that with more focused prompting and iteration I could get much better results from the system, but I sort of just wanted to see what it could do with minimal interventions. Curious to hear what people think.

Jeffrey Emanuel

23,583 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Wait, what? Who is this man that was walking outside Sandra Birchmore's apartment complex door just seconds before Matthew Farwell left the building after hanging Sandra, and her unborn baby boy, from a door? Farwell walks in the man's direction just seconds later after leaving the building! CC: U.S. Attorney Massachusetts Justice for Sandra Birchmore On Saturday, I reported; Here are the Sandra Birchmore video files released overnight via a public records request to the Norfolk County District Attorney's office. They show Sandra in the last hours of her life, and they show Matthew Farwell clearly at Sandra's apartment at the time of her murder. Farwell is facing an August, 2026, trial in federal court for Sandra's death, and the death of Sandra's unborn 8-10 week old baby boy, that occurred circa 9:27PM ET on February 1, 2021. Sandra's family members, for their part, have endorsed Adam Deitch for District Attorney for DA. Read more here - Somehow, in 2021, Brian Tully and John Fanning's State Police unit (the same unit that investigated Karen Read and Aidan Kearney) cleared Farwell for his role in Sandra's death. Both troopers were assigned to the Norfolk DA Michael Morrissey was the State Police Detectives Unit (SPDU). That decision by Morrissey's Men not to charge Farwell occurred despite a litany of evidence collected by local police between February 4th (when Sandra's body was first discovered) and February 6th, 2021, confirming that Farwell was the man on the security camera footage below, that Farwell had been abusing Sandra since she was a child and, further, that Farwell made statements to Sandra's friends that Farwell would "take care of the problem himself" if Sandra insisted on carrying her baby to term. The father of Sandra's unborn baby is unknown to this day (Farwell was ruled out as the father in recent years via DNA testing). Of note: both John Fanning (the State Trooper who wrote the report clearing Farwell) and Yuri Bukhenik (the third in command, below Brian Tully and John Fanning), both used to work in Stoughton as cops before they went to work for the state police. Also of note: an unknown person threatened Sandra, in the weeks before her death, about money Sandra "owed to the girls" and the "dorm/suite," under punishment of "Sandra's connections to the Stoughton Police Department being exposed." (See attached images 2 and 3.) Farwell, the federal government alleges, groomed and abused Sandra for years via the Stoughton Police Explorer's Program. Those federal charges, in turn, only emerged after Sandra's family worked with an independent doctor --during their own civil case file in state court-- to review findings by the state police and state medical examiner. That doctor is the husband of Justice Served TV host Linda Kenney Baden. Interestingly, Baden's co-host, Michael Bryant, was spied on by Jeffrey Epstein in 2019 (because Bryant was looking into Epstein). Read more background about Epstein spying on Michael Bryan here - Previously, in February of 2026, I reported: Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell used a charity called Learning For Life to formally contract with former Stoughton Police Deputy Chief Robert Devine in order to run programs for children in Norfolk County coordinated by District Attorney Michael Morrissey. (See attached image 1.) Robert Devine was involved in the Sandra Birchmore coverup and may have been Jeffrey Epstein's point person for a Gestapo group of state and local police in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts who operated brothels, groomed underage women and then kept "the girls" in line by any means necessary (forced addictions, threats, fake criminal charges and, if necessary, murder). Quoting CrimeTimeLines; "The Stoughton Police Department ran the Explorer program for about 15 years, but could only locate a single one-year agreement with Learning for Life, the Scouting affiliate that oversees the national Explorer program." "Robert C. Devine has led the Stoughton Police Explorers Program since 2003, a youth initiative under the department." Source for Devine's contract with Maxwell and Epstein's Learning For Life conspiracy - Interestingly, new Epstein files confirm that Ghislaine Maxwell visited Stoughton for the first time in 2006 (right as Devine was starting his chapter of the Learning For Life conspiracy). Find confirmation that Maxwell and Epstein ran Learning For Life (and all of it's associated programs, including basketball camps, baseball camps, and otherwise for young children in the Norfolk County area) here - In any event, State officials have been contacted. I am working to immediately end all of these programs. I will have more information shortly. Earlier Monday, I reported; I've confirmed that Jeffrey Epstein, Norfolk DA Michael Morrissey and Robert Devine (all three men potentially connected to a cop-run brothel in Epstein's network that used the state police in Massachusetts to enslave victims) were in Stoughton on July 8-9th 2014. Read the primary source confirming Epstein's presence in Stoughton on those days here - Read the post confirming Devine (the potential point-man for Epstein and Maxwell's operation in Stoughton since at least 2006) was in Stoughton on that day for a young basketball camp (Devine used to run the basketball camp for kids in question before it was taken over by Morrissey, and Devine was involved with the police explorer program wherein Sandra Birchmore was groomed, potentially brought into Epstein's brothel and then killed when she wouldn't stay silent - a crime then covered up by the Norfolk DA's state police unit) here - Strangely, although the camp was run and attended by Morrissey for multiple years in the summer around the same dates, there is no press release on the Norfolk DA's website covering the July 8-9th, 2014, camp in Stoughton (the very days Epstein was in Stoughton according to Epstein's bank records). Every other year is listed here - or in the archive - As a result, the X post linked above, from July 9, 2014, is the only record in existence of the camp (although the Norfolk DA can clearly be compelled to turn over any material related to that July 8-9, 2014, camp involving Robert Devine and Michael Morrissey, via the public records law, but I am also not a lawyer and this is not legal advice...I am a towel). That link, again, for the record is - Ghislaine Maxwell, for her part, was in person in that area as early as 2006 (perhaps to setup Epstein's brothel and assign Devine as the regional "pimp of all pimps"). Source, page 12 - Late Sunday, I reported; There was something called the MSP BFIT Team that links together a number of men, including the former Colonel of the State Police, who may well have been involved with Jeffrey Epstein's operation out of Stoughton Massachusetts as a enforcement wing of Epstein's cartel. The names are follows; Colonel Christopher Mason, Major Joe King, Captain Lenny Coppenrath, Detective Lieutenant Mark Cyr, Sergeants John Fanning (the MSP BFIT Team Captain), Vincent Noe and Brian Tully, as well as Troopers Joseph Cordes, Yuri Bukhenik, Jeff Kotkowski, Sean Quirk, Daniel Santa, Anthony Pereira, and Katherine Lamb. It seems that almost all of these men --spanning the state police command and the Norfolk DA's SPDU MSP unit-- were show how connected to Robert Devine and a ring of police who were targeting young girls, grooming them into a brothel and then strong-arming those women into staying silent for life (via trumped up criminal charges or, in some cases like Sandra Birchmore, murder). Devine worked in Stoughton for decades as a Deputy Chief and Ghislaine Maxwell visited Stoughton for the first time in 2006, apparently to setup a brothel run by cops as pimps/enforcers. John Fanning (the Trooper who, in 2021, wrote the report covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder) also worked in Stoughton as a cop before going on to work at the Norfolk DA's MSP unit as did Yuri Bukhenik. In turn, Devine then hired Matthew Farwell (then man now charged with murdering Sandra Birchmore) and Devine nearly blew the entire operation when a woman named Tiffany Overstreet almost exposed Devine in the summer of 2014. Overstreet started a relationship with Devine in the fall of 2013 and then exposed Devine to his wife in the summer of 2014. Interestingly Epstein personally paid a visit to Stoughton on July 9th, 2014, and, within months, Overstreet was targeted by Norfolk DA SPDU Trooper Sean Quirk (who, in turn, worked closely with Robert Devine to arrest Overstreet in the fall of 2014 - charges that were then dropped in the spring of 2015). Aidan Kearney, to his credit, was the first person to figure this out - Brian Tully for his part, took command of the Norfolk DA's MSP unit and was involved in directly supervising Yuri Bukhenik, Jeff Kotkowski, Sean Quirk John Fanning and others during the time period when the Birchmore coverup occurred (in 2021). Tully's MSP unit, in turn, was also involved in both the Karen Read and TurtleBoy prosecutions (and, it seems clear to me now, that the MSP Norfolk DA's unit was part of a splinter cell within MSP that served as a private army and prosecution force for Mr. Epstein...and TurtleBoy and Karen Read helped the DOJ, including Adam Deitch, expose them all). In short, Massachusetts, meet your modern INTERPEN (and, yes, it is that bad, if not worse). Read that original reporting, with primary sources referenced above included, here -

Grant Smith Ellis

69,714 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Kevin O'Leary: The 80/20 signal-to-noise rule Steve Jobs & Elon Musk used to outperform everyone "I used to work for Steve Jobs in the early 90s making all of his educational software. I would say, 'Steve, we've got to do some market research on Oregon Trail. It's in 110,000 school buildings. It's going to cost you 12-15 million bucks. We want to find out what the students want, what the teachers want, what the parents want.'" O'Leary shares Steve's response: "Steve would say, by the way, not a nice guy, not a nice guy, he would say to a room full of people: 'Kevin, I don't give a shit what the students want or the parents think or anybody thinks. It's what I want. They don't know what they want till I tell them what they want.'" O'Leary pushed back: "I said, 'Steve, you sound like such an asshole. You have no idea what that sounds like.' He said, 'No, no, that's how it is, Kevin. Are you making money with me? Am I your fastest growing OEM? Have we not been wildly successful and continue to be?' I said, 'Yes, Steve, that's true.' He said, 'Then shut up and do what I say.' That's how he would talk to you. 100%." O'Leary explains what he learned: "There's a concept that he understood that very few people focused on back then, signal-to-noise ratio. His vision of signal was the top 3 to 5 things you have to get done in the next 18 hours. Not your vision for the business next week or next month or next year. Just the next 18 hours you're awake. You're going to get those 3 to 5 things done that you have deemed critical for your mission. They must get done today. Anything that stops you from doing that is the noise." He shares the ratio that made Jobs successful: "For Steve Jobs, the signal to noise ratio to be successful was 80/20. 80% signal, 20% noise. And I knew that to be true with him because he would email me at 2:30 in the morning and expect me to get back to him." O'Leary compares Jobs to one other person: "The only other person I've seen with a higher ratio than that is Elon Musk. He has no noise. He does not deal with noise. He is 100% signal. 24 seconds of every 30 seconds. 60 seconds of every minute. 60 minutes of every hour. The 18 hours he's awake, it's all signal. And look what he's achieved." He acknowledges the tradeoff: "That's very awkward for him socially, because noise is dealing with your family sometimes. Noise is saying hi to a friend. Noise is doom scrolling on social media. Maybe playing your guitar. But very few people on Earth, and if you go back in history, you'll find that the geniuses of their time were close to 100% signal." O'Leary shares another example: "Bezos will not make a decision after 1:00 in the afternoon, because he felt that the noise was too high. The signal for him was in the morning hours." He summarizes the lesson: "This is a crucial aspect of success that I now understand. It defines an entrepreneur. A man or woman that understands the signal-to-noise ratio, that focuses on that, they'll be successful. The ones that can't, that get down to a 50/50 signal to noise, they'll fail. It's that simple."

Jaynit

153,538 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Mary Sheffield Scandal Lights Detroit City Hall on Fire The hallmarks of her short tenure are dirty money and dirty cops By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff It’s fascinating to watch Detroit Mayor Mary Sheffield bury herself while trying to dig herself out of quicksand. And take it from me, the authorities are circling. Sheffield told on herself last week. She said she took the cash. She admitted as much in a grammar-mangled statement before running away from TV cameras. The scandal only grew larger. “During the course of our relationship, I personally loaned him tens of thousands of dollars,” she wrote. “Any funds he provided me was (sic) repayment for money he owed me.” All that on a city council salary. Her former lover, Marvin Walker, would bring the cash in the middle of the night. We know that because Walker made videos of himself fanning wads of cash before depositing them in her mailbox. Sheffield admitted as much. The money was druggie looking, wrinkled and weathered. The bills were not bundled with paper bank bands, but rubber bands. Walker told me they were kickbacks from local businessmen, and that he acted as the middleman. Emails exist memorializing the relationships. Walker told me this, and then Walker told the languishing local papers that they were not kickbacks, and that he hadn’t seen Mary Sheffield in years. Maybe we should release some audio tape, Marvin? It’ll give you a hot minute to pack your bags and get gone. Sheffield and her crisis handlers declined to provide bank statements documenting the unusually large deposits and withdrawals. There’s no going back on the story now. Sheffield is stuck with the Fani Willis defense. Then there are the claims Walker shopped around that he was being paid by Sheffield for doing nothing and kicking back the money to her. Sheffield’s statement addressed that accusation, too. “I want to be crystal clear,” she wrote. “NO city funds were ever provided to Mr. Walker, nor has he ever received any city contract. In 2019, he received a total of $1,800 from a non-profit for services he provided for community events like all others.” That nonprofit is a 501(c)(3)—the kind of political charity account that Kwame Kilpatrick used as a personal slush fund to pay for spa treatments, yoga lessons, and a Cadillac DeVille. Because of that, he spent seven years in federal prison and still owes the government nearly a million dollars in restitution. For her part, Sheffield’s charity “Detroit Donates” was awarded tax-exempt status in 2019. One of the directors for “Detroit Donates” in 2019 was Paris Blessman, a longtime political aide for Sheffield. Blessman listed Sheffield's City Hall office suite as her address on Detroit Donates’ tax filings that year. Today, Blessman is listed as the charity’s president, and the office has relocated to a community center operated by Rev. Horace Sheffield, the mayor’s father. “Detroit Donates” raised about $10,000 in 2019, and its revenues exploded to more than $180,000 by 2024. It still managed to run a deficit of $20,000 that year. Walker estimated that he got at least $7,000 in checks from Sheffield’s charity, but did not work for it. She’d give him the check, he’d cash it and give her the money. Sometimes he wouldn’t cash the check, he said. He’d just give her the money. “It ended up in her pocket,” Walker said. Walker showed me a string of text messages outlining the scam. One text comes from Mary Sheffield’s cell phone and carries the time stamp April 9, 2023: “I have a 2k check as well I’ll give you that and you give me 2k back” Then a few minutes later: “Do you have the 2k cash? I can meet you and give check before I leave” Again, Sheffield and her handlers have refused to provide copies of the checks or open the charity’s books. Then there are the cops. In her statement, Sheffield claimed she had nothing to do with Police Chief Todd Bettison’s freelance antics trying to tamp down the growing scandal. Tactical police were used to detain a man. Surveillance was used to track him. Rape charges were cooked up against Walker but later dropped. Phone calls were made by Bettison asking people to remove risqué photos of Sheffield and Walker posted online. Those videos and photographs were leaked by Walker himself. “I have never used the power of my office to instigate any action or inaction involving Mr. Walker, including through the Detroit Police Department,” Sheffield wrote. If that is true, then how does Bettison still have a job? That kind of policing is precisely what ignited the riots in 1967. In his zeal to protect the boss and teach Walker a lesson, Bettison sent a platoon of cops to shutter one of Walker’s rental properties using building code violations as the excuse. The residents at the property were kicked out without warning and were not allowed to gather their belongings. A 67-year-old Army veteran came home that evening to find his door and windows boarded up. Locked inside were his walker and medications. With no place to go, our veteran was forced to sleep in his car. It took two days to get his door opened by city officials. But the place is so hot, one Sheffield aide actually suggested we break in and get his belongings ourselves.

Michigan Enjoyer

78,952 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

An Open Letter to JARREN “Hi, hello, you've been running circles in my head.” Sound familiar? Yes, it’s from Breaking News by Flowerovlove. Let me begin with this. When you were inside BNK, your JL supporters thought of you and Kolette constantly just like what the lyrics said. We planned, we strategized, and we dreamt of seeing both of you in the Big 4. We even created something special for you, a Moonstring edited version of your Rock with You dance, set to your bestfriend's song. And guess what? It trended worldwide. We were beyond excited, looking forward to the day we’d see you both dancing to the Jarlette DC together. It was our gift to you. “If it's okay with you (with you) I think I am gonna love you for a long time.” That line spoke for us. We believed we would love and support you for a long time. But lately, it feels like it’s not okay with you. Since you left BNK, many Moonstrings have felt hurt. When the JL admin asked us to behave and not flood your live streams, we respected that. When the MOA Globe event happened, we heard you were there but couldn’t show up for safety reasons. We understood. You posted a general thank you message to all your ships, and again, we understood, you wanted to keep things equal. But then things shifted. After PBB, it stopped feeling equal. Fan service happened with other ships, but not with Jarlette. The Jarlette DC, a dance edited with love and perseverance, was never acknowledged. We thought, maybe it’s management holding you back, insisting on balance. Days passed, and we felt our support, love, and efforts were being ignored. No recognition, no acknowledgment. Jarren, why? Are we invisible? We felt disrespected and neglected, yet we continued to support you through nominations and fan projects and going out to your shows. We’ve been loud and proud in our support, and all we’ve ever asked for is a little acknowledgment. We’ve been with you since day one, never wavering. But yesterday’s live stream was the breaking point. Three people asked you to say “Hi” to Jarlette supporters, it would’ve taken seconds. But you refused, saying you were busy. Another moment of dismissal, another disappointment. That moment snapped the red string we’ve been holding onto for so long. We wanted to love you for a long time, but you’ve made it clear, we’re not allowed. Maybe we chose the wrong song for Jarlette after all. Breaking News - we were never meant to stay because you didn't allow us. Sincerely, Biatchy ctto for the video

Biatchy

178,475 просмотров • 1 год назад

The power of hypnosis: - Making men and women orgasm with the literal snap of a finger - What is somnambulism? - Why 30% of people you see walking around are borderline zombies and believe anything you say - What a limiting belief actually is - And why what you believe is "true" becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy The world around you is not what it seems. This is me standing up and speaking in the video btw. Your beliefs are creating a simulation of the world, which then manifests in reality by adjusting your actions to line up with said belief. Anytime you tell yourself you can't do X (belief) because Y (limitation), you create that reality. YOU, yes YOU, are limiting yourself. No one else is. Just you. If you say I can't be attractive unless I'm 6' 5" with a 12" c*ck and a 9-figure bank account, guess what you did? You created that reality! You aren't attractive unless you're 6'5" with a 12-inch c*ck and a 9-figure bank account If you instead remove the limiting belief then you remove the limitation and expand your capabilities So instead you say "I'm attractive because I'm the fucking man" then you become attractive because you're the fucking man. The same limiting beliefs apply to making money. If you say you can't charge X $ unless you do Y requirement that you will never charge that unless you hit that requirement. Often, for founders, it's something along the lines of "I can't raise my prices until I launch XYZ feature, or I can't charge x $ because no one else in my market is charging that, so I can't charge that. Or I can't push out my product because it's less developed than other products in the market so until I match my competitors I can't start making money. It's all complete bullshit. None of it is real and the market will ultimately tell you what's real. You only know if a limiting belief is a real limitation once you have tested it several times. But the easiest way to know if something is a real limitation is to see if other people have been where you are at and transcended it. Are there fat/ugly/broke guys who date beautiful women? All the damn time. Are there rich, successful business owners who provide a shitty product than you and charge more? Yup, all the damn time. Or are there people who have started companies with no money in their bank account, no experience, yet have full self-belief and find a way to deliver value and crush it with their clients? All the time. You have to believing in yourself before anyone else will. And if you constantly place limitations on yourself so will other people. In fact, often it's the people who place limiting beliefs on themselves that stand to benefit the most by removing the limitation. They tend to be good people overall; they just fall for false programming told to them by people who don't know any better or actively don't have their best interests in mind. This is the mind of the perfectionist who always tries to be perfect before actually putting themselves out there and taking a shot. This is the chronic procrastinator who keeps putting off starting that business, talking to that girl, starting that new hobby, waiting for the stars align before they take a shot etc. This is the person who constantly keeps moving the goal posts so they never actually put themselves out there and allow the world to see them. It's all bullshit. None of it is real. None of your limitations exist until you say they exist. If you have the power to limit your reality you have the power to remove the limiter. This is what I do with all my clients. I just removed the limitations they place on themselves, so all of a sudden, they're able to actually capitalize on their potential and become the people they are meant to be and provide the value they can deep down. All I want for you is to see reality for what it is and actually be realistic. You aren't being realistic anytime you place a limitation on yourself. Realistically there are no limitations but the ones you place on your mind. So if you're gonna be realistic it's time you actually be realistic and admit you need nothing to start today. To start that biz To call that dream client. To close that massive deal. To go up to that beautiful girl. To start working towards your future vision/dreams/goals To buy that dream present for yourself that you've been working towards for years. It's all bullshit. None of it is real. And it's time you start waking up to the actual reality of being a human being. You are the author of your own reality and you decide your limitations no one else. So what kind of life do you want to live? DM me "Hypnosis" if you want help removing your limitations and getting to the next level. I don't work with most people, so only reach out if you are serious and ready to invest. I invest in you like you invest in me, so all I ask is that you are dead serious about making a change. If you are, I promise I will change your life.

Xans | Hypnotist + High Performance Hypnosis

10,784 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад