Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

South African Racist Group Invokes Twisted Logic To Evade Accountability AfriForum, a racist lobby group in South Africa, has pulled a calculated stunt to derail the country’s ongoing Khampepe Commission. Headed by Justice Sisi Khampepe, the commission was set up to investigate atrocities committed by the apartheid government, with...

41,799 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

News24’s latest hit piece on AfriForum: AfriForum demonstrates its commitment to transparency by responding to News24’s allegations in the video below and in the article at this link: In contrast, News24 refused to answer any of the questions I put to them regarding their parent company’s R8 million donation to the ANC and why News24/Media24 stopped publishing its financial statements in 2021. The remuneration figures that News24 attributes to AfriForum’s directors are false and based on incorrect information that does not appear in AfriForum’s financial statements. For example, AfriForum pays no remuneration to Werner Human, while there are also numerous other errors. Below is the correspondence I recently sent to Kyle Cowan from News24: ⸻ Good day Kyle, Thank you for your email. As always, I will gladly respond. AfriForum is proud of the content of the organisation’s financial reports submitted to the Department of Social Development in accordance with the Department’s reporting requirements. Over the past 20 years, since AfriForum was established, these reports have not only been approved by the Department but are also based on AfriForum’s financial statements, which have received clean audits throughout the same 20-year period. I wish to place on record that, in the interest of transparency, AfriForum has already answered 79 questions from News24 comprehensively. AfriForum’s detailed response to News24’s first fishing expedition, consisting of 67 questions, apparently failed to provide any material to advance News24’s anti-AfriForum agenda. News24 subsequently made a second attempt with a further 12 questions, which AfriForum also answered comprehensively. In apparent desperation, News24 has now continued its fishing expedition with another 26 questions. It should also be placed on record that, unlike AfriForum, which has demonstrated a commitment to transparency, News24 has steadfastly refused to answer any questions regarding the R8 million donation, or any other amount, allegedly made by the group of which it forms part to the ANC in recent years, as well as why the company of which News24 forms part stopped publishing its financial statements in 2021. Unlike AfriForum, News24 has also categorically refused to grant AfriForum access to News24’s financial statements and salary information. Nevertheless, I will gladly answer your 26 new questions as soon as I receive answers to the six questions I asked regarding News24’s links to donations made to the ANC and its financial matters. The questions put to News24 will not disappear, and I therefore await your response so that I may proceed with providing AfriForum’s further answers. News24 is encouraged to demonstrate the same level of transparency as AfriForum. To refresh your memory, below is the substance of the questions that you and News24 have now refused to answer for almost a month, and which you are once again requested to answer: • Can News24 confirm that its parent company, Naspers, donated R8 million, or any other amount, to the ANC between 2021 and 2025? • Is News24 comfortable with the fact that its parent company funds a corrupt political party and is therefore indirectly complicit in promoting corruption? • If News24 is uncomfortable with Naspers’s support for the ANC, has News24 expressed its opposition to such support? If not, why not? • Do you agree that Naspers’s support for the ANC, while News24 pursues what appears to be a political vendetta against organisations such as AfriForum that expose ANC corruption, has the effect of protecting the ANC? • News24/Media24 stopped publishing its financial statements in 2021. May I request that you send me the unpublished financial statements? Please also explain why you stopped publishing them. In addition, please provide me with the salaries of News24’s journalists. I await your response. Kind regards Kallie Kriel

Kallie Kriel

20,232 views • 10 days ago

ANTI-APARTHEID SONG THAT ANGERS MUSK In the last few days, tech billionaire Elon Musk has shared multiple posts accusing South African politician Julius Malema of inciting gen*cide against White people. The incident comes amid tension between the US and South Africa over a newly adopted land-reform law. On Sunday, the Trump ally even called for Malema to be declared an 'international criminal' and sanctioned. It’s not the first time Musk has taken a swipe at the pan-African opposition figure. In 2023, he claimed the EFF party leader’s chanting of an apartheid-era song - K*ll the Boer - amounted to 'openly pushing for genocide of White people' in South Africa. However, like so many of Musk's claims, the accusation was incorrect. In 2022, South Africa's High Court ruled that the song, which emerged during the struggle against apartheid, did not amount to hate speech or call for gen*cide. The term 'Boer' means farmer in Afrikaans, the language spoken by South Africans of Dutch descent. However, in the South African context, it loosely refers to all White people who are of Dutch origin, the group that dominated the apartheid-era government. So when freedom fighters sang about 'shooting the Boer,' they were not talking about shooting individual Boers but about bringing down the racist, oppressive system of apartheid. It hardly seems credible that a man who has sent people into space can fail to understand this, so Musk must know that Malema is not asking his supporters to k*ll White people. But his performative anger is understandable: as a beneficiary of apartheid-era policies, Musk won't like a song that energises young people to break the system that paved the way for him to become the world's richest man.

African Stream

63,350 views • 1 year ago

ORANIA: THE WHITES-ONLY TOWN IN SOUTH AFRICA In 2024, South Africans were among the more than 3-billion people who went to the polls in more than 60 countries in national elections. For South Africa, the elections had historical significance - they came at a time when the country was marking three decades since the end of apartheid. When apartheid ended in 1994, many Black South Africans had high expectations about what the future held for them after centuries of social and economic exclusion. Decades later, the African National Congress (ANC), which has governed the country since 1994, is facing accusations of not doing enough to dismantle apartheid-era socio-economic structures and injustices. Nothing exemplifies this better than the existence of Orania, a Whites-only town in the country's Northern Cape province. The town has been a source of tension since its establishment in the early '90s during the last days of apartheid. The town's founders and residents claim its purpose is to preserve the culture and identity of the Afrikaner people, White South Africans of mostly Dutch, French and German descent. However, many people think the town and its policy of not allowing non-White residents is nothing but a racist endeavour to maintain some vestiges of the apartheid system. The town's residents insist that its existence is protected by Article 235 of the South African constitution, which guarantees self-determination. However, many have argued that the cited part of the constitution does not, in fact, permit people of a particular religious or cultural group to live in a secluded place away from other South Africans. In 2000, the Northern Cape High Court adjourned 'sine die' (without a further hearing date) after Orania's proponents challenged attempts by the government to incorporate the town into the nearby municipal authority. African Stream was shown around Orania by some of the locals, who shared their opinions about their community with us. We'd love to hear yours as well in the replies.

African Stream

12,019 views • 1 year ago

Diplomatic crisis with the US is in no one’s interest: The civil rights organisation AfriForum says the current diplomatic crisis with the US is not in anyone’s interest in South Africa and could have been prevented if the ANC leadership had not ignored AfriForum and the Solidarity Movement’s efforts to help find solutions. AfriForum emphasises that, as an organisation, it remains committed to helping find solutions to this crisis in the best interest of everyone in the country. According to Kallie Kriel, CEO of AfriForum, ANC leaders have so far actively prevented attempts to find solutions by, among other things, inviting the Iranian ambassador to the ANC headquarters and making anti-American statements. “Ronald Lamola, Minister of International Relations and Cooperation, acted directly against South Africa’s interests by publicly accusing President Donald Trump of having a ‘white supremacy’ agenda, despite his role as minister to promote international relations. Lamola disregarded the possibility of retaliation for his statements, and now we are all reaping the bitter fruits of that,” says Kriel. Referring to Trump’s latest statements on social media about farm murders and property rights, Kriel says that concrete steps must be taken to combat farm murders and protect property rights, as this is the best way to tackle these issues. According to Kriel, AfriForum has therefore already made several proposals to the ANC’s leaders to serve as solutions in this regard. AfriForum proposes, among other things, the following solutions for combating farm murders and protecting property rights: Farm Murders • President Ramaphosa should be urged to unconditionally condemn the “Kill the Boer” chant, which is a call for ethnic violence against Afrikaners. • The South African government should at least acknowledge the fact that farm murders are accompanied by excessive torture and violence. • Farm murders should be declared a priority crime, as is already the case with numerous other crimes, including rhino poaching. • The government should decide that the South African Police Service (SAPS) should officially and in a planned manner collaborate with farm and neighbourhood watches nationwide that operate within the framework of the law. Expropriation Act • The South African government must commit itself to protecting property rights. • Section 12(3) of the Expropriation Act, which allows for expropriation without compensation, must be revoked. • Section 19(2) of the Expropriation Act, which allows for expropriation to take place before a court decision is reached, must be amended.

Kallie Kriel

28,047 views • 8 months ago

The Justice Department and Donald Trump are finalizing a deal to launch "Truth and Justice Commission" The ‘Truth and Justice Commission’ will be created to pay victims of government weaponization Trump is agreeing to drop his $10 billion dollar lawsuit against the IRS for leaking his tax returns in exchange for this new commission “President Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS may soon be dropped — The lawsuit stems from the leak of some of his tax returns in 2019 and 2020 by a government contractor who pled guilty in 2023. And now sources say the president is preparing to drop the $10 billion lawsuit in exchange for the creation of a fund that would compensate his allies who claim they were targeted by the, quote, weaponize the Biden Justice Department” This is a very good thing The “Truth and Justice Commission” would oversee a $1.776 billion compensation fund (The number references 1776, the year of U.S. independence) It will compensate individuals and entities who claim they were victims of “government weaponization” during the Biden administration Most of the 1,600 people charged in connection with January 6 will be eligible for compensation The commission would have 5 members. 4 appointed by the Attorney General, with Trump reportedly able to remove them without cause (if they aren’t doing their jobs) Make it permanent. As long as there are Democrats they will weaponize the justice system against Americans

Wall Street Apes

64,997 views • 2 months ago