Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Spare us the performative outrage. Angela Rayner still won’t commit to publishing the Islamophobia report - despite serious concerns it could pave the way for a backdoor blasphemy law. Let’s be real: the Government’s definition is already stitched up to win votes. The bare minimum is transparency. Publish the report.

Kevin Hollinrake MP

23,487 subscribers

124,942 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Fellasmum

Fellasmumvor 1 Jahr

What incendiary language?

Profilbild von Kevin Hollinrake MP

Kevin Hollinrake MPvor 1 Jahr

Quite!

Profilbild von Mark (Wizard/Engineer)

Mark (Wizard/Engineer)vor 1 Jahr

@2b_freeforever What is insentry language? That's not a slip of the tongue, she genuinely tries to use words she doesn't understand. We're an embarrassment as a country, when a thick mess like that is secretary of state. I despise the labour party for what it has become. Champagne socialists.

Profilbild von Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧🇮🇱

Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧🇮🇱vor 1 Jahr

"This is about power. It's about silencing uncomfortable facts. It's about neutering any criticism of Islamist ideology - the same ideology that fuels grooming gangs, honour killings, and jihad."

Profilbild von Stuck Farmer

Stuck Farmervor 1 Jahr

Deeply disappointed by the tone and conduct of this child. Is this really the standard of conduct for a Deputy Prime Minister? Hard to believe how far we've fallen.

Profilbild von Mobile Scanner

Mobile Scannervor 1 Jahr

Scan any documents, convert images into text, PDF files, etc. 👍

Profilbild von Benjamin Davis-Rice

Benjamin Davis-Ricevor 1 Jahr

Don’t forget she’s going to lose her seat to an ‘independent’ candidate. It’s all performative nonsense and a Hail Mary to save her job.

Profilbild von 🇬🇧 Suicidal Empathy 🇬🇧

🇬🇧 Suicidal Empathy 🇬🇧vor 1 Jahr

She won’t even disclose whether or not the Muslim Brotherhood (a designated Terrorist organisation in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain) is involved in the report or not. I strongly suspect they are. Absolutely outrageous. Fire her IMMEDIATELY.

Profilbild von Clive Smith - cure Pulmonary Hypertension now

Clive Smith - cure Pulmonary Hypertension nowvor 1 Jahr

This is what the Coral Lady is sayin The EU lover and UK traitor @dominicgrieve_ and the rest of this secretive group, who are all Muslim will decide on the definition and completely avoid scrutiny within the House of Commons What's the point of Parliament under @Keir_Starmer

Profilbild von Nicholas Cook

Nicholas Cookvor 1 Jahr

'Incendiary language' is Rayner's double-speak for reasoned argument.

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 NEW: I’ve been told that Labour are inviting left wing activists to come and see their secret Islamophobia definition. But they’re not publishing it to give the public the same opportunity. The definition risks becoming a back-door blasphemy law. The secrecy has to stop.

🚨 NEW: I’ve been told that Labour are inviting left wing activists to come and see their secret Islamophobia definition. But they’re not publishing it to give the public the same opportunity. The definition risks becoming a back-door blasphemy law. The secrecy has to stop.

Claire Coutinho

297,709 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

A year ago Keir Starmer was asked to introduce a blasphemy law. He didn't say no. Today he said he wouldn't introduce a blasphemy law through an Islamophobia definition. But we know his Government has been working on one for MONTHS and they are refusing to let the public see it - despite inviting left-wing activist groups to provide feedback. They must publish the definition BEFORE a decision is made so that we can all scrutinise the definition and the impact it will have on freedom of speech.

A year ago Keir Starmer was asked to introduce a blasphemy law. He didn't say no. Today he said he wouldn't introduce a blasphemy law through an Islamophobia definition. But we know his Government has been working on one for MONTHS and they are refusing to let the public see it - despite inviting left-wing activist groups to provide feedback. They must publish the definition BEFORE a decision is made so that we can all scrutinise the definition and the impact it will have on freedom of speech.

Claire Coutinho

164,428 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

David Lammy says judges can adopt the Government’s “Islamophobia” definition. It’s supposed to be non-statutory. But it’s clearly going to change the way the law works. That’s why we will scrap it.

David Lammy says judges can adopt the Government’s “Islamophobia” definition. It’s supposed to be non-statutory. But it’s clearly going to change the way the law works. That’s why we will scrap it.

Nick Timothy MP

277,317 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Islamist takeover of the UK is so chilling that Slippery Starmer now admits his corrupted Labour government is plotting an Islamophobia definition – effectively a blasphemy law – through the backdoor. Yet the anti-English campaigns from the invaders become more extreme...

The Islamist takeover of the UK is so chilling that Slippery Starmer now admits his corrupted Labour government is plotting an Islamophobia definition – effectively a blasphemy law – through the backdoor. Yet the anti-English campaigns from the invaders become more extreme...

Dan Wootton

68,177 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Lee Anderson MP asks the Deputy Prime Minister, Angela Rayner, to define what Islamophobia is. Despite Labour constantly harping on about ‘Islamophobia’, they can’t define it. How can people be arrested and jailed for something the government can’t even define?

Lee Anderson MP asks the Deputy Prime Minister, Angela Rayner, to define what Islamophobia is. Despite Labour constantly harping on about ‘Islamophobia’, they can’t define it. How can people be arrested and jailed for something the government can’t even define?

Turning Point UK 🇬🇧

447,721 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨NAZ "Those Grooming Gang Victims should shut up for the sake of diversity" SHAH is also part of the new British Muslim Trust The group are set up specifically to push for new blasphemy laws in the UK and to report Islamophobia to the authorities Disgusting

🚨NAZ "Those Grooming Gang Victims should shut up for the sake of diversity" SHAH is also part of the new British Muslim Trust The group are set up specifically to push for new blasphemy laws in the UK and to report Islamophobia to the authorities Disgusting

Basil the Great

41,458 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 WHO IS DRAFTING THE ‘ISLAMOPHOBIA’ DEFINITION? The Government’s official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — will have a chilling effect on free speech. It risks silencing legitimate criticism of Islam and its practices, and deterring people from speaking out about issues such as the grooming gangs scandal and Islamist extremism. So who was tasked with drafting Britain’s new Muslim blasphemy law? In a new report, the FSU’s Director of Research and Policy David Rose reveals that all five members of the Working Group responsible for drafting the definition have links to Islamist organisations. Watch the full podcast episode in the comments 👇

🚨 WHO IS DRAFTING THE ‘ISLAMOPHOBIA’ DEFINITION? The Government’s official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — will have a chilling effect on free speech. It risks silencing legitimate criticism of Islam and its practices, and deterring people from speaking out about issues such as the grooming gangs scandal and Islamist extremism. So who was tasked with drafting Britain’s new Muslim blasphemy law? In a new report, the FSU’s Director of Research and Policy David Rose reveals that all five members of the Working Group responsible for drafting the definition have links to Islamist organisations. Watch the full podcast episode in the comments 👇

The Free Speech Union

36,578 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Islamophobia is on the rise in Canada. The Islamophobia office was never setup to succeed. Instead of responding to the community's demands to empower the office, the government shut down the office and replaced it with a hollow committee. This is performative politics. We won’t accept it. #cdnpoli

Islamophobia is on the rise in Canada. The Islamophobia office was never setup to succeed. Instead of responding to the community's demands to empower the office, the government shut down the office and replaced it with a hollow committee. This is performative politics. We won’t accept it. #cdnpoli

Mohamad Fakih, C.M.

42,495 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Keir Starmer didn't want to wait for the report into Nadhim Zahawi's tax affairs before asking for him to be sacked So why hasn't he already sacked Angela Rayner!

Keir Starmer didn't want to wait for the report into Nadhim Zahawi's tax affairs before asking for him to be sacked So why hasn't he already sacked Angela Rayner!

TimForAlI 🇬🇧🇺🇦🇮🇱🇬🇪

241,993 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mike Graham calls for a definition of Anglophobia, as Angela Rayner is to set up a body investigating the definition of Islamophobia. "Forget about Islamophobia, there are people in this Labour government, and I count Keir Starmer among them, who actually hate Britain." Mike Graham 🇬🇧

Mike Graham calls for a definition of Anglophobia, as Angela Rayner is to set up a body investigating the definition of Islamophobia. "Forget about Islamophobia, there are people in this Labour government, and I count Keir Starmer among them, who actually hate Britain." Mike Graham 🇬🇧

Talk

149,962 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WOW. One minute of your time. Listen to this. “The Labour Party has adopted the APPG definition of Islamophobia. The same APPG report said TALKING about Sex Groomers is an example of Islamophobia.”

WOW. One minute of your time. Listen to this. “The Labour Party has adopted the APPG definition of Islamophobia. The same APPG report said TALKING about Sex Groomers is an example of Islamophobia.”

Kosher

375,839 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 FREE SPEECH UNION CHALLENGES GOVERNMENT “ISLAMOPHOBIA” DEFINITION A major legal battle over free speech is now unfolding in Britain. The Free Speech Union has announced it is launching a judicial review against the government’s adoption of a new official definition of “Islamophobia” (described by ministers as anti-Muslim hostility). Critics argue the policy risks creating a blasphemy law through the back door, something Parliament abolished in England and Wales nearly two decades ago. According to the Free Speech Union, the government’s plan to adopt the definition — and appoint an official “czar” to enforce it — could seriously restrict lawful debate, criticism, and public discussion. They say legal advice suggests the move may be unlawful, and have formally placed the government on notice that they intend to challenge the decision in court. The organisation is now asking supporters to help fund the case, warning that judicial reviews against government policy are extremely expensive but crucial for protecting civil liberties. The core question now being raised is simple: Has the government created a new form of blasphemy protection for one religion, or is this a necessary step to combat discrimination? The courts may soon decide. The Free Speech Union

🚨 FREE SPEECH UNION CHALLENGES GOVERNMENT “ISLAMOPHOBIA” DEFINITION A major legal battle over free speech is now unfolding in Britain. The Free Speech Union has announced it is launching a judicial review against the government’s adoption of a new official definition of “Islamophobia” (described by ministers as anti-Muslim hostility). Critics argue the policy risks creating a blasphemy law through the back door, something Parliament abolished in England and Wales nearly two decades ago. According to the Free Speech Union, the government’s plan to adopt the definition — and appoint an official “czar” to enforce it — could seriously restrict lawful debate, criticism, and public discussion. They say legal advice suggests the move may be unlawful, and have formally placed the government on notice that they intend to challenge the decision in court. The organisation is now asking supporters to help fund the case, warning that judicial reviews against government policy are extremely expensive but crucial for protecting civil liberties. The core question now being raised is simple: Has the government created a new form of blasphemy protection for one religion, or is this a necessary step to combat discrimination? The courts may soon decide. The Free Speech Union

Jim Ferguson

13,650 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

'The idea of Angela Rayner as Prime Minister is just too horrifying to contemplate.' Piers Pottinger doesn't believe Angela Rayner has the capability to be Prime Minister, despite reports that the former deputy PM is preparing her leadership bid.

'The idea of Angela Rayner as Prime Minister is just too horrifying to contemplate.' Piers Pottinger doesn't believe Angela Rayner has the capability to be Prime Minister, despite reports that the former deputy PM is preparing her leadership bid.

GB News

15,672 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨Angela Rayner can’t give a definition for Islamophobia when being quizzed by Lee Anderson at PMQs She struggles to even say the word 🤦‍♂️

🚨Angela Rayner can’t give a definition for Islamophobia when being quizzed by Lee Anderson at PMQs She struggles to even say the word 🤦‍♂️

Skint Eastwood

29,434 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Britain now has an Islamic blasphemy law via the backdoor, thanks to the Government’s official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”. From the start, the Free Speech Union warned that any such definition would have a chilling effect on free speech and stifle our right to criticise, debate, and mock religion in this country. We were proved right almost immediately. Since the definition was published in March, it has been used by activists and Labour MPs to silence legitimate criticism of Islam. When the Shadow Justice Secretary, Nick Timothy, criticised a mass Muslim public prayer event in Trafalgar Square, he was branded an Islamophobe, reported to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, and even faced calls to resign from the then Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer. The Labour Government did not consult Parliament about its plans to revive Britain’s blasphemy laws for Islam alone. At the start of the year, the Free Speech Union exposed that all five members of the Working Group tasked by Angela Rayner to draft the Islamophobia definition had troubling links to Islamist organisations. These include the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND, both of which are subject to a government policy of non-engagement over concerns about extremism. What is even more concerning is that it is almost certain extremists were able to influence the drafting of the definition. If that is not alarming enough, Nick Timothy’s Freedom of Information (FOI) request has revealed that the Communities Department deleted all the responses to the Working Group’s consultation on the Islamophobia definition. If there is nothing to hide, why did the department delete all the responses — a move that appears to breach its own policy on data retention? There are serious questions for Angela Rayner and her department to answer. Why did they delete all these responses? Did ministers direct officials to dispose of the submissions? Did extremist groups really have the chance to influence the definition, while the Free Speech Union and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) did not? The public deserves to know the truth.

Britain now has an Islamic blasphemy law via the backdoor, thanks to the Government’s official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”. From the start, the Free Speech Union warned that any such definition would have a chilling effect on free speech and stifle our right to criticise, debate, and mock religion in this country. We were proved right almost immediately. Since the definition was published in March, it has been used by activists and Labour MPs to silence legitimate criticism of Islam. When the Shadow Justice Secretary, Nick Timothy, criticised a mass Muslim public prayer event in Trafalgar Square, he was branded an Islamophobe, reported to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, and even faced calls to resign from the then Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer. The Labour Government did not consult Parliament about its plans to revive Britain’s blasphemy laws for Islam alone. At the start of the year, the Free Speech Union exposed that all five members of the Working Group tasked by Angela Rayner to draft the Islamophobia definition had troubling links to Islamist organisations. These include the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND, both of which are subject to a government policy of non-engagement over concerns about extremism. What is even more concerning is that it is almost certain extremists were able to influence the drafting of the definition. If that is not alarming enough, Nick Timothy’s Freedom of Information (FOI) request has revealed that the Communities Department deleted all the responses to the Working Group’s consultation on the Islamophobia definition. If there is nothing to hide, why did the department delete all the responses — a move that appears to breach its own policy on data retention? There are serious questions for Angela Rayner and her department to answer. Why did they delete all these responses? Did ministers direct officials to dispose of the submissions? Did extremist groups really have the chance to influence the definition, while the Free Speech Union and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) did not? The public deserves to know the truth.

Imtiaz Mahmood

26,252 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Publishing the results of a special counsel’s investigation is the norm. Making an exception to allow Jack Smith’s report to be buried would be indefensible. The public deserves the facts.

Publishing the results of a special counsel’s investigation is the norm. Making an exception to allow Jack Smith’s report to be buried would be indefensible. The public deserves the facts.

Adam Schiff

526,065 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr