Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Speaker Johnson is 100% correct: ⤵️ ✅ “The Second Amendment is a critical freedom in the Constitution.” ✅ “There’s no real rationale for adding taxes on these pieces of equipment [like suppressors].” ✅ “We had the votes to do it, and I think it was a long time overdue.”... show more

Gun Owners of America

433,488 subscribers

35,988 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Kerry Slone(Stilettos&Shotguns)

Kerry Slone(Stilettos&Shotguns)vor 1 Jahr

Even a politician can get it right once in a while!

Profilbild von SpudmanWP

SpudmanWPvor 1 Jahr

Remember that this includes all CCW, FOID, NICS, and all other "fees" involved in any process the government puts in the way of you exercising your 2A protected rights.

Profilbild von GunsNewYork (In Exile)

GunsNewYork (In Exile)vor 1 Jahr

No, he’s partially correct; full credit would be acknowledging the tax remains on other NFA items and excise taxes are also a problem. He’s attempting to placate us and it’s not going to work.

Profilbild von Kurt

Kurtvor 1 Jahr

Good on TV appearances, Terrible at actually following through. Like most politicians.

Profilbild von e_gel72 🇺🇸

e_gel72 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

I have a difficult time trusting Mr. Johnson. That’s my opinion.

Profilbild von David StMartin ♿️🇺🇸

David StMartin ♿️🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Still waiting on National Concealed Carry..

Profilbild von B. K. Lemons

B. K. Lemonsvor 1 Jahr

Speaker Johnson and GOA are 100% WRONG: The Second Amendment is *NOT* "a critical freedom in the Constitution.” The Second Amendment is *NOT* a "freedom" at all. Instead, it is a law that prohibits governmental infringement of a God-given, natural, unalienable, human freedom.

Profilbild von Totsig

Totsigvor 1 Jahr

Suppressors. Not silencers. Hearing protection.

Profilbild von RD7K 🇺🇸

RD7K 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Rare Johnson W, what he said applies to the NFA as a whole!

Profilbild von KARRAR HUSSEIN

KARRAR HUSSEINvor 1 Jahr

Short act must add to big Beautiful bill

Ähnliche Videos

It's time to remove the red tape on owning suppressors. 🇺🇸 Speaker Mike Johnson: “The Second Amendment is a critical freedom in the Constitution, and there’s no real rationale for adding taxes on these pieces of equipment.” “I think it was a long time overdue.”

It's time to remove the red tape on owning suppressors. 🇺🇸 Speaker Mike Johnson: “The Second Amendment is a critical freedom in the Constitution, and there’s no real rationale for adding taxes on these pieces of equipment.” “I think it was a long time overdue.”

NRA

59,966 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

KARL: There's a provision that eliminates a tax on gun silencers. It's been on the books for about 100 years. Why? MIKE JOHNSON: The 2nd Amendment is a critical freedom in the Constitution, and there's no real rationale for adding taxes on these pieces of equipment.

KARL: There's a provision that eliminates a tax on gun silencers. It's been on the books for about 100 years. Why? MIKE JOHNSON: The 2nd Amendment is a critical freedom in the Constitution, and there's no real rationale for adding taxes on these pieces of equipment.

Aaron Rupar

629,958 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Congress has a historic opportunity to eliminate the taxation and registration of short-barreled firearms and suppressors through budget reconciliation. The American people are watching—it’s time to deliver.

Congress has a historic opportunity to eliminate the taxation and registration of short-barreled firearms and suppressors through budget reconciliation. The American people are watching—it’s time to deliver.

Rep. Andrew Clyde

20,506 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Shall not be infringed is NOT a suggestion. By the way, I’m actually fighting to go further than the current bill. Eliminate the taxation AND registration of suppressors AND short-barreled firearms.

Shall not be infringed is NOT a suggestion. By the way, I’m actually fighting to go further than the current bill. Eliminate the taxation AND registration of suppressors AND short-barreled firearms.

Rep. Andrew Clyde

76,928 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"The House now has a historic opportunity to repeal the burdensome taxation, registration, & regulation of short-barreled firearms & suppressors under the National Firearms Act. "The American People are watching. It is time to deliver." — Rep. Andrew Clyde is on 🔥

"The House now has a historic opportunity to repeal the burdensome taxation, registration, & regulation of short-barreled firearms & suppressors under the National Firearms Act. "The American People are watching. It is time to deliver." — Rep. Andrew Clyde is on 🔥

Gun Owners of America

104,437 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is why Rep. Andrew Clyde (A+ GOA Rated) just voted NO on the reconciliation bill in committee ⤵️ "House Republicans have a once-in-a-decade opportunity to deliver real conservative change in Washington. [This includes] restoring Second Amendment rights. "Unfortunately, the current version falls short of these goals and fails to deliver the transformative change that Americans were promised. Substantive improvements are needed, and I look forward to working with this committee and our House Republican conference to make sure we deliver. "As an ardent Second Amendment defender, I’ve always promised to defend my constituents’ Second Amendment rights. Today, excise taxes, specifically transfer and making taxes, are imposed on every firearm regulated under the National Firearms Act of 1934. "As Chief Justice John Marshall warned in 1819, 'The power to tax involves the power to destroy,' and he was absolutely right. These taxes have enabled unconstitutional regulation and registration under the National Firearms Act. "This is exemplified by the Biden administration’s dangerous pistol brace rule, which turned millions of law-abiding gun owners, many of them veterans, into felons overnight. The House now has a historic opportunity to repeal the burdensome taxation, registration, and regulation of short-barreled firearms, both rifles and shotguns, and suppressors under the National Firearms Act. The American people are watching; it is time to deliver. "For these reasons, I am unable to support this package in its current form, but I look forward to strengthening this bill to ensure that it does pass so that we fulfill all of our America-first promises to the American people. Thank you, and I yield back."

This is why Rep. Andrew Clyde (A+ GOA Rated) just voted NO on the reconciliation bill in committee ⤵️ "House Republicans have a once-in-a-decade opportunity to deliver real conservative change in Washington. [This includes] restoring Second Amendment rights. "Unfortunately, the current version falls short of these goals and fails to deliver the transformative change that Americans were promised. Substantive improvements are needed, and I look forward to working with this committee and our House Republican conference to make sure we deliver. "As an ardent Second Amendment defender, I’ve always promised to defend my constituents’ Second Amendment rights. Today, excise taxes, specifically transfer and making taxes, are imposed on every firearm regulated under the National Firearms Act of 1934. "As Chief Justice John Marshall warned in 1819, 'The power to tax involves the power to destroy,' and he was absolutely right. These taxes have enabled unconstitutional regulation and registration under the National Firearms Act. "This is exemplified by the Biden administration’s dangerous pistol brace rule, which turned millions of law-abiding gun owners, many of them veterans, into felons overnight. The House now has a historic opportunity to repeal the burdensome taxation, registration, and regulation of short-barreled firearms, both rifles and shotguns, and suppressors under the National Firearms Act. The American people are watching; it is time to deliver. "For these reasons, I am unable to support this package in its current form, but I look forward to strengthening this bill to ensure that it does pass so that we fulfill all of our America-first promises to the American people. Thank you, and I yield back."

Gun Owners of America

20,217 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

T.I. expressed his confusion to Deante Kyle about people serving prison time for possessing a firearm as a felon, He claims he learnt that federal laws are based off the guidelines of the Constitution, and the Second Amendment states that people have the right to bear arms and that those rights are inalienable👀🫩 “Now in my research and my studies i have found that federal laws are based off of the guidelines of the constitution, constitution second amendment says we have the right to bear arms, those rights or that right is inalienable, inalienable means it can’t be taken away or given away, so if the right to bear arms is an inalienable right, how are there so many people doing time because they had a firearm as a felon”

T.I. expressed his confusion to Deante Kyle about people serving prison time for possessing a firearm as a felon, He claims he learnt that federal laws are based off the guidelines of the Constitution, and the Second Amendment states that people have the right to bear arms and that those rights are inalienable👀🫩 “Now in my research and my studies i have found that federal laws are based off of the guidelines of the constitution, constitution second amendment says we have the right to bear arms, those rights or that right is inalienable, inalienable means it can’t be taken away or given away, so if the right to bear arms is an inalienable right, how are there so many people doing time because they had a firearm as a felon”

flame⛧

159,794 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

We called it the One Big Beautiful Bill because there’s something in it for everyone: ✅ No tax on tips ✅ No tax on overtime ✅ Tax relief for seniors ✅ Higher take-home pay for families ✅ Increased economic growth This is how you deliver for the American people.

We called it the One Big Beautiful Bill because there’s something in it for everyone: ✅ No tax on tips ✅ No tax on overtime ✅ Tax relief for seniors ✅ Higher take-home pay for families ✅ Increased economic growth This is how you deliver for the American people.

Speaker Mike Johnson

134,338 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

“I don’t think I have the perfect interpretation [of scripture] because I’m not a perfect person, but I do look to the word of God to be my authority and humbly, in humility, try to do the very best I can to understand all of it in context and apply it to my life. Rationale is really important…but to say that it’s the determinant of morality, that’s a really scary world. Think about what our rationale has rationalized for so long.”

“I don’t think I have the perfect interpretation [of scripture] because I’m not a perfect person, but I do look to the word of God to be my authority and humbly, in humility, try to do the very best I can to understand all of it in context and apply it to my life. Rationale is really important…but to say that it’s the determinant of morality, that’s a really scary world. Think about what our rationale has rationalized for so long.”

Natalie Jean Beisner

48,796 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Buttigieg: Some people say there’s nothing you can do about it unless you have a constitutional amendment. Well, guess what? If that’s true, we ought to have a constitutional amendment. Remember, that didn’t used to be considered impossible. We’ve had about 30 of them. Some of the things we take for granted as core to the Constitution—it’s right in there, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment—the word “amendment” means it wasn’t even in the original text. Amendments have always been a critically important part of how our Constitution is supposed to work. We just forgot about it. We amended our Constitution for prohibition. We changed our Constitution so you couldn’t have a beer. And then we thought that’s a bad idea, and we changed it back. Don’t tell me we can’t change the Constitution to get money out of politics.

Buttigieg: Some people say there’s nothing you can do about it unless you have a constitutional amendment. Well, guess what? If that’s true, we ought to have a constitutional amendment. Remember, that didn’t used to be considered impossible. We’ve had about 30 of them. Some of the things we take for granted as core to the Constitution—it’s right in there, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment—the word “amendment” means it wasn’t even in the original text. Amendments have always been a critically important part of how our Constitution is supposed to work. We just forgot about it. We amended our Constitution for prohibition. We changed our Constitution so you couldn’t have a beer. And then we thought that’s a bad idea, and we changed it back. Don’t tell me we can’t change the Constitution to get money out of politics.

Acyn

178,675 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsht “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the fk 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely fking closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sht up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

574,026 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."

The All-In Podcast

260,998 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Rep Chip Roy confirms on Fox News Muslims are working to intact Sharia Law “We're dealing with effectively a political movement, a political effort to Islamify Texas and the United States, to building a majority, to then implement Sharia law, and ultimately to convert people” “That's the goal and they're pretty open about it.” “The issue here is, is under our constitution, you can believe what you want to believe. It is a fundamental part of the First Amendment. But at the end of the day, when you've got something that is undermining our rule of law, undermining our constitution, we do not have to allow more people to come in who adhere to it, nor do we have to allow the creation of communities that are exclusionary and designed to implement Sharia law and so forth.” “Importantly, our Judeo-Christian heritage serves at the center of who we are as a country, and we have to remember that even as we protect the Constitution, the First Amendment, but we've got to remember to protect our culture at the same time.”

Rep Chip Roy confirms on Fox News Muslims are working to intact Sharia Law “We're dealing with effectively a political movement, a political effort to Islamify Texas and the United States, to building a majority, to then implement Sharia law, and ultimately to convert people” “That's the goal and they're pretty open about it.” “The issue here is, is under our constitution, you can believe what you want to believe. It is a fundamental part of the First Amendment. But at the end of the day, when you've got something that is undermining our rule of law, undermining our constitution, we do not have to allow more people to come in who adhere to it, nor do we have to allow the creation of communities that are exclusionary and designed to implement Sharia law and so forth.” “Importantly, our Judeo-Christian heritage serves at the center of who we are as a country, and we have to remember that even as we protect the Constitution, the First Amendment, but we've got to remember to protect our culture at the same time.”

Wall Street Apes

46,431 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

Steve Guest

115,581 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025

Mario Nawfal

1,738,796 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: We must end the tyranny of the bureaucracy. “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people, you do not have democracy, you have rule of the bureau, bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to follow to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 3, 2025

Elon Musk: We must end the tyranny of the bureaucracy. “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people, you do not have democracy, you have rule of the bureau, bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to follow to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 3, 2025

ELON CLIPS

14,738 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Senator Eric Schmitt calls to Nuke the Zombie Filibuster as Leader Thune CONFIRMS he will Force a Vote on the SAVE America Act after Trump urged Congress to pass it at the State of The Union: “I think it’s going to take a level of commitment, not just have it on the floor but to spend the time, we talk about the talking filibuster, a lot of people think filibuster in the U.S. Senate is a kind of Jimmy Stewart moment in Mr. Smith goes to Washington, it’s not like that at all, it’s kind of like Kabuki theater, there’s 60 votes, you punch the clock and it either is or isn’t. I do think we should make them earn it and make them spend the requisite time to wear them down on this thing… this is the reason it’s called the SAVE America Act.”

Senator Eric Schmitt calls to Nuke the Zombie Filibuster as Leader Thune CONFIRMS he will Force a Vote on the SAVE America Act after Trump urged Congress to pass it at the State of The Union: “I think it’s going to take a level of commitment, not just have it on the floor but to spend the time, we talk about the talking filibuster, a lot of people think filibuster in the U.S. Senate is a kind of Jimmy Stewart moment in Mr. Smith goes to Washington, it’s not like that at all, it’s kind of like Kabuki theater, there’s 60 votes, you punch the clock and it either is or isn’t. I do think we should make them earn it and make them spend the requisite time to wear them down on this thing… this is the reason it’s called the SAVE America Act.”

Benny Johnson

49,446 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon Musk: We should let ideas compete, not suppress them. “I think we should embrace a diversity of views, and we should have reasonable arguments, and we should have debates. The essence of free speech is that ideas survive when they're competing ideas in the marketplace of ideas. And if somebody says something that's incorrect, then that can be corrected. That's what happens on the 𝕏 platform. People will say something, then others will add context to it, or they will correct it, or there will be a community note. This applies equally to the left and right. There's no thumb on the scale like there used to be. And there's no voice on the left that's been silenced, unlike in the past, where many voices on the right were silenced. But they just don't seem to like the idea that people on the right can say what they want to say within the bounds of the law, which is startling.” Pittsburgh, October 20, 2024

Elon Musk: We should let ideas compete, not suppress them. “I think we should embrace a diversity of views, and we should have reasonable arguments, and we should have debates. The essence of free speech is that ideas survive when they're competing ideas in the marketplace of ideas. And if somebody says something that's incorrect, then that can be corrected. That's what happens on the 𝕏 platform. People will say something, then others will add context to it, or they will correct it, or there will be a community note. This applies equally to the left and right. There's no thumb on the scale like there used to be. And there's no voice on the left that's been silenced, unlike in the past, where many voices on the right were silenced. But they just don't seem to like the idea that people on the right can say what they want to say within the bounds of the law, which is startling.” Pittsburgh, October 20, 2024

ELON CLIPS

10,690,933 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON MUSK: "I would prefer not to be in politics. I stepped into the arena because I think the stakes are extremely fundamental. I fear if Trump does not win, we are going to have a single-party state that is going to be worse than California. The one thing that keeps California from going even further is that people can move out of California and still be in America. But if you've got no place to move, then it's going to be much worse than California, and that's the danger that we face. An oppressive totalitarian state that has extreme restrictions on freedom of speech that continues extreme over-regulation that makes government even bigger than it is today and takes away the liberty of the people. It's not something I wanted to do, but I thought it was critical to do it, or America is not going to be America." 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

ELON MUSK: "I would prefer not to be in politics. I stepped into the arena because I think the stakes are extremely fundamental. I fear if Trump does not win, we are going to have a single-party state that is going to be worse than California. The one thing that keeps California from going even further is that people can move out of California and still be in America. But if you've got no place to move, then it's going to be much worse than California, and that's the danger that we face. An oppressive totalitarian state that has extreme restrictions on freedom of speech that continues extreme over-regulation that makes government even bigger than it is today and takes away the liberty of the people. It's not something I wanted to do, but I thought it was critical to do it, or America is not going to be America." 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

KanekoaTheGreat

25,732,313 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr