.Speaker Mike Johnson: "We're not de-funding courts. We're not doing anything other than limiting, in this legislation, the ability of a judge to issue a nationwide injunction."

@SpeakerJohnson Then what if the name of fuck is the purpose of a federal court if not to interpret federal laws nationwide and issue injunctions pending cases/hearings?

𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝟏𝟎 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐔𝐒 𝐑𝐔𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐒 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳. ★ READ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

@SpeakerJohnson Can’t the courts issue a ruling that this is unconstitutional…. Therefore making it null and void

@SpeakerJohnson Did he says the 3 branches of government are equal and design to put a check on the other. So a judge can do what he is doing becuse that branch of government has the same power as the president.

@SpeakerJohnson This must really hit hard for people that never studied constitutional law.

@SpeakerJohnson Checks and balances, this administration hates the Constitution.

@SpeakerJohnson Someone tell this moisturizing, closet homo, cuck to stfu and sign his fascist bill already...he's gunna go down as one of the worst speakers in history enabling Trump to be THE worst president in history.

@SpeakerJohnson And Congress believes it has the right to determine judicial process? @SpeakerJohnson, about that Constitutional thingie....

@SpeakerJohnson Congress has tools. This is one of them. Neuter these tyrannical judges. Examples must be made..

@SpeakerJohnson Hey @SpeakerJohnson - You won't. It would be unConstitutional. The judiciary is a co-equal branch of government. You have the ability to appeal. And you use injunctions and have your own judges, like Matthew Kacsmaryk in Texas, so GFY, closet case.

@SpeakerJohnson Stop doing illegal things and the courts won’t be coming up with the injunctions!!!