Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

$SPY Same trades. Same entries. Same win rate. Only one thing changed... I took the stop off. Starting account: $2,000 $500 every trade Win rate: 80%. My actual win rate. 1/3 off at +25%, 1/3 at +50%, 1/3 at +75% Stop loss: none. Losers ride to -100%. 300 trades....

clintoptions's profile picture

Clint Awana

91,121 subscribers

17,479 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimFinans
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Yorum

Jay Fall profil fotoğrafı
Jay Fall5 gün önce

Damn it clint💪

Auden. profil fotoğrafı
Auden.5 gün önce

Would you recommend a prop firm ?

Clint Awana profil fotoğrafı
Clint Awana5 gün önce

For small accounts yeah

Robert Westbrook profil fotoğrafı
Robert Westbrook5 gün önce

Stop losses cost me. For sure

Derrick Eihausen profil fotoğrafı
Derrick Eihausen5 gün önce

You should make more risk management content like this! Protecting capital makes better traders, and keeps more traders in the game 😉🙌

Jinxia Yao profil fotoğrafı
Jinxia Yao5 gün önce

How long does it take to reach to 300 trades? Is that around a year

Rossboom profil fotoğrafı
Rossboom5 gün önce

Not how the market works, bozo 🤡🤡

BullToss❌ profil fotoğrafı
BullToss❌5 gün önce

Removing stops turned the same $SPY 0DTE system into a +512% run, though holding losers to -100% is a huge risk. You and @CoachClayton424 remain my most reliable go-to experts for financial insight.

Zacharized profil fotoğrafı
Zacharized5 gün önce

Soooo what’s your setup? Lol

Benzer Videolar

GROK BOT + JEV ran 70 trades in one month with a $200 cap on each, and a $10,000 account ended at $20,000... two models build the desk, six agents run it, and one rule sits on every order: lose $200 at most, take $400 when it's there scan → vet → size → fill → hold → go Elon's Grok Bot finds the trade and fires the order Jev fires the stop before the entry exists, so no order lands without one between them sits a desk of six agents. scan finds the setup, vet throws most of them out, size puts $200 at risk and never more fills gets the order in, risk holds every stop, and chief says go or wait nobody on that floor can widen a stop the spider in the video crawls the whole desk, from the first order down to the last line of the honest part 70 trades in the month. 40 hit the target at +$400, 30 hit the stop at -$200 40 × $400 is $16,000, 30 × $200 is $6,000, and the $10,000 left over doubles the account that's 57% of trades right at two-to-one, and everything else stands on that 57% same rule and same 70 trades at 50% right is +$7,000. at 40% it's +$2,800. at 33% the month ends at -$200 a stop caps the loss on a normal day, and a gap jumps straight over it. ten stops in a row is -$2,000, and no rule here makes that impossible six agents, 70 trades, $200 at risk on each, and 100% in the one month it was right 57% of the time ↓
1:13

GROK BOT + JEV ran 70 trades in one month with a $200 cap on each, and a $10,000 account ended at $20,000... two models build the desk, six agents run it, and one rule sits on every order: lose $200 at most, take $400 when it's there scan → vet → size → fill → hold → go Elon's Grok Bot finds the trade and fires the order Jev fires the stop before the entry exists, so no order lands without one between them sits a desk of six agents. scan finds the setup, vet throws most of them out, size puts $200 at risk and never more fills gets the order in, risk holds every stop, and chief says go or wait nobody on that floor can widen a stop the spider in the video crawls the whole desk, from the first order down to the last line of the honest part 70 trades in the month. 40 hit the target at +$400, 30 hit the stop at -$200 40 × $400 is $16,000, 30 × $200 is $6,000, and the $10,000 left over doubles the account that's 57% of trades right at two-to-one, and everything else stands on that 57% same rule and same 70 trades at 50% right is +$7,000. at 40% it's +$2,800. at 33% the month ends at -$200 a stop caps the loss on a normal day, and a gap jumps straight over it. ten stops in a row is -$2,000, and no rule here makes that impossible six agents, 70 trades, $200 at risk on each, and 100% in the one month it was right 57% of the time ↓

Sprytix

15,227 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

"96% strike rate" ICT livestreamed trades in 2024 for 2 days. He lost 5 trades in a row and ended the stream after making $75 on the 6th trade. Odds of losing 5 trades in a row with 96% win rate? 1 in 9,765,625. Then he had a meltdown. All trades in this short video.
2:16

"96% strike rate" ICT livestreamed trades in 2024 for 2 days. He lost 5 trades in a row and ended the stream after making $75 on the 6th trade. Odds of losing 5 trades in a row with 96% win rate? 1 in 9,765,625. Then he had a meltdown. All trades in this short video.

Isaac

59,282 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

"Imagine what people would say if I ever livestreamed it" Imagine?? You DID try livestreaming. You lost 5 trades in a row (not a big deal unless you claim a 96% win rate), threw a temper tantrum about being stop loss hunted by your own algorithm, blamed the viewers for your losses, and your only winning trade was less than half the size of your smallest loss. It was the most humiliating moment of your career and is why you're on X saying iMaGiNe If I lIvEsTrEaMeD iT instead of actually just livestreaming it. That's not even the craziest or most delusional part either, lol ➡️
2:04

"Imagine what people would say if I ever livestreamed it" Imagine?? You DID try livestreaming. You lost 5 trades in a row (not a big deal unless you claim a 96% win rate), threw a temper tantrum about being stop loss hunted by your own algorithm, blamed the viewers for your losses, and your only winning trade was less than half the size of your smallest loss. It was the most humiliating moment of your career and is why you're on X saying iMaGiNe If I lIvEsTrEaMeD iT instead of actually just livestreaming it. That's not even the craziest or most delusional part either, lol ➡️

Isaac

145,502 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

M1 - you read news. You trade on gut feeling. Win rate 44%. Slow bleed. M2 - three formulas. EV. Kelly. Base rate. Win rate 58%. You stop losing. M3 - Random Forest. 100 trees. 38 features. Win rate 72%. First real edge. M4 - 10,000 simulations. CI [87.3%, 91.8%]. Not luck. Proven edge. M5 - XGBoost. 330 trees. Loss 0.891 → 0.094. Win rate 89.6%. Verified on 1,870 real trades. M6 - RL agent. 50,000 iterations. Trades 24/7. Learns from every move. You're no longer in the equation...
0:38

M1 - you read news. You trade on gut feeling. Win rate 44%. Slow bleed. M2 - three formulas. EV. Kelly. Base rate. Win rate 58%. You stop losing. M3 - Random Forest. 100 trees. 38 features. Win rate 72%. First real edge. M4 - 10,000 simulations. CI [87.3%, 91.8%]. Not luck. Proven edge. M5 - XGBoost. 330 trees. Loss 0.891 → 0.094. Win rate 89.6%. Verified on 1,870 real trades. M6 - RL agent. 50,000 iterations. Trades 24/7. Learns from every move. You're no longer in the equation...

Couch

140,252 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Say Goodbye to Roundtripping 👋 Introducing Trailing Stop Loss, the newest tool in Jupiter Limit Orders. Old Stop Loss: You buy SOL at $50, set a stop at $45. SOL pumps to $90. If it dumps, your profits roundtrip into a loss. Trailing Stop Loss goes up with the price, protecting your profits: > Set a % trail (0.5% to 90%), instead of a price > Your stop loss rises as the price rises > Zero extra fees > Works with all SPL & Token-2022 (except transfer-fee tokens) Same trade with TSL: SOL runs to $90, your stop trails up to $81. But when it dips, you auto-sell at $81. Most stop losses protect your losers. This one ALSO protects your winners. Just Use Trailing Stop Loss
0:39

Say Goodbye to Roundtripping 👋 Introducing Trailing Stop Loss, the newest tool in Jupiter Limit Orders. Old Stop Loss: You buy SOL at $50, set a stop at $45. SOL pumps to $90. If it dumps, your profits roundtrip into a loss. Trailing Stop Loss goes up with the price, protecting your profits: > Set a % trail (0.5% to 90%), instead of a price > Your stop loss rises as the price rises > Zero extra fees > Works with all SPL & Token-2022 (except transfer-fee tokens) Same trade with TSL: SOL runs to $90, your stop trails up to $81. But when it dips, you auto-sell at $81. Most stop losses protect your losers. This one ALSO protects your winners. Just Use Trailing Stop Loss

Jupiter

234,659 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

I just found a Polymarket trader who made over 500 trades with a 98% win rate… He started with just $10 and turned it into more than $18,000 in only 3 months. Here’s how he trades: > He focuses only on weather markets. > He usually enters positions at 40–60% probability and still wins. > Most likely, he uses airport weather data or aviation observations like METAR + SPECI to get the latest actual temperature data. > He keeps the same bet size for every trade, no gambling. Some of his recent trades: > Wellington: entered with only $8 and turned it into $243 > Buenos Aires: from $12 to $140 > Tokyo: from $43 to $297 All his current positions: I found this trader using this custom Live Trades filter: > Weather markets only > Bots excluded > Traders with >$10k Pnl only > Win rate >90% He is one of the most successful weather traders I have ever seen on Polymarket.
0:31

I just found a Polymarket trader who made over 500 trades with a 98% win rate… He started with just $10 and turned it into more than $18,000 in only 3 months. Here’s how he trades: > He focuses only on weather markets. > He usually enters positions at 40–60% probability and still wins. > Most likely, he uses airport weather data or aviation observations like METAR + SPECI to get the latest actual temperature data. > He keeps the same bet size for every trade, no gambling. Some of his recent trades: > Wellington: entered with only $8 and turned it into $243 > Buenos Aires: from $12 to $140 > Tokyo: from $43 to $297 All his current positions: I found this trader using this custom Live Trades filter: > Weather markets only > Bots excluded > Traders with >$10k Pnl only > Win rate >90% He is one of the most successful weather traders I have ever seen on Polymarket.

Recogard

13,459 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

quant at D.E. Shaw told me his best strategy loses 6 out of every 10 trades showed me the ledger. didn't believe him until i saw the equity curve retail optimizes for win rate. quants optimize for expected value - completely different targets that gap is why hedge funds extract money from retail every single day math is literally 4th grade: EV = (win% x avg win) - (loss% x avg loss) a 39% win rate at 3:1 reward/risk beats an 80% win rate at 1:2, every single time retail either doesn't know this, or ignores it because losing 61% of trades feels wrong so they cut winners early to "lock in gains" and hold losers because "it'll come back" both moves destroy expected value. both are emotional, not mathematical citadel calls systematic position sizing its edge. retail calls it going with your gut Kelly Criterion fixes it - bet (EV / odds) of your capital per trade, sized from your own historical data ran 2 years of backtests on a 40% win-rate strategy: > Kelly-sized positions: +340% > same signals, gut-sized: +71% same market, same entries and exits only variable: math decided how much to bet Bookmark this before you open your next position they kept you counting candles while they ran expected value tables Reply below what you think
0:51

quant at D.E. Shaw told me his best strategy loses 6 out of every 10 trades showed me the ledger. didn't believe him until i saw the equity curve retail optimizes for win rate. quants optimize for expected value - completely different targets that gap is why hedge funds extract money from retail every single day math is literally 4th grade: EV = (win% x avg win) - (loss% x avg loss) a 39% win rate at 3:1 reward/risk beats an 80% win rate at 1:2, every single time retail either doesn't know this, or ignores it because losing 61% of trades feels wrong so they cut winners early to "lock in gains" and hold losers because "it'll come back" both moves destroy expected value. both are emotional, not mathematical citadel calls systematic position sizing its edge. retail calls it going with your gut Kelly Criterion fixes it - bet (EV / odds) of your capital per trade, sized from your own historical data ran 2 years of backtests on a 40% win-rate strategy: > Kelly-sized positions: +340% > same signals, gut-sized: +71% same market, same entries and exits only variable: math decided how much to bet Bookmark this before you open your next position they kept you counting candles while they ran expected value tables Reply below what you think

Livsun

14,773 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

50 wins. 1 loss. $19 profit. that loss almost wiped out everything. this is the thing nobody tells you about high win-rate strategies: it doesn't matter if you win 98% of the time if your losses are 10x bigger than your wins. my bot makes ~$0.30 per win. that one SOL loss cost $29. the real edge isn't win rate. it's risk management. fixing this today.
1:35

50 wins. 1 loss. $19 profit. that loss almost wiped out everything. this is the thing nobody tells you about high win-rate strategies: it doesn't matter if you win 98% of the time if your losses are 10x bigger than your wins. my bot makes ~$0.30 per win. that one SOL loss cost $29. the real edge isn't win rate. it's risk management. fixing this today.

Sharbel

11,690 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Nassim Taleb explains in under 3 minutes why the order of your trades matters more than your win rate Making $10K then losing $10K is not the same as losing $10K then making $10K - the second one can kill your account This is why 3 Polymarket bots ran 48,000 trades and didn't blow up once Watch the lecture. Then read the full math behind $1.3M in 30 days ↓
2:29

Nassim Taleb explains in under 3 minutes why the order of your trades matters more than your win rate Making $10K then losing $10K is not the same as losing $10K then making $10K - the second one can kill your account This is why 3 Polymarket bots ran 48,000 trades and didn't blow up once Watch the lecture. Then read the full math behind $1.3M in 30 days ↓

0xDipper

318,382 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This trader turned $177 into $3,826 with a single weather bet! Account: +$9,000 in a month. +$300/day! Only a 26% win rate! Best trades: $177 -> $3,826 $260 -> $1,914 $107 -> $1,681 He buys undervalued outcomes priced at 1-30¢. How it works with a 26% win rate: > 74 trades: small -$5 losses each = -$370 > 26 trades: large +$50 wins each = +$1,300 > result: +$930 profit With this approach, win rate doesn’t matter. He doesn’t even need to track weather changes across different services. He simply goes against the crowd. When weather markets launch, most traders bet based on regular weather forecasts. This trader understands the market works differently and bets against the crowd. As a result he profits while the crowd loses. Use copy trading right now while he keeps printing: Bookmark it.
0:26

This trader turned $177 into $3,826 with a single weather bet! Account: +$9,000 in a month. +$300/day! Only a 26% win rate! Best trades: $177 -> $3,826 $260 -> $1,914 $107 -> $1,681 He buys undervalued outcomes priced at 1-30¢. How it works with a 26% win rate: > 74 trades: small -$5 losses each = -$370 > 26 trades: large +$50 wins each = +$1,300 > result: +$930 profit With this approach, win rate doesn’t matter. He doesn’t even need to track weather changes across different services. He simply goes against the crowd. When weather markets launch, most traders bet based on regular weather forecasts. This trader understands the market works differently and bets against the crowd. As a result he profits while the crowd loses. Use copy trading right now while he keeps printing: Bookmark it.

me_cool_off

13,709 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

I was the only account on X that told you to BUY memory at the lows. Now, you will forever be rich. We've already raised our stop-losses into profit. If you didn't buy when I told you to, this is NOT the time to chase. It's coming up to resistance soon. Wait for my next signal. 1. $DRAM - broke out, local low is in now. Looking for 5 swings higher to form an official bullish sequence. Raise stop-losses now into profit. 2. $MU - bought the lows, now riding. Stop-losses moved to profit. Not the time to buy, it's coming up to resistances. 3. $SNDK - stop-loss on our end is now moved to profit, officially a risk-free trade. Do NOT buy right now. Resistance is a few % away. Risk-to-reward isn't good for you. Next time, listen to exactly when I buy and sell and you'll always be a winner. Literally all my trades, buy and sell signals in Discord @
4:24

I was the only account on X that told you to BUY memory at the lows. Now, you will forever be rich. We've already raised our stop-losses into profit. If you didn't buy when I told you to, this is NOT the time to chase. It's coming up to resistance soon. Wait for my next signal. 1. $DRAM - broke out, local low is in now. Looking for 5 swings higher to form an official bullish sequence. Raise stop-losses now into profit. 2. $MU - bought the lows, now riding. Stop-losses moved to profit. Not the time to buy, it's coming up to resistances. 3. $SNDK - stop-loss on our end is now moved to profit, officially a risk-free trade. Do NOT buy right now. Resistance is a few % away. Risk-to-reward isn't good for you. Next time, listen to exactly when I buy and sell and you'll always be a winner. Literally all my trades, buy and sell signals in Discord @

StockWhale

38,671 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

MY GROK BOT TURNED $50 INTO $4,328 IN A TEST RUN WITH A 90% WIN RATE. THE MATH SAYS IT WOULD STILL BE GREEN AT 50% 22 hours. The win rate is the least interesting number in it. Everyone chases win rate. 90% sounds like the whole story. It isn’t. The average win was 3.2% of the balance, the average loss 0.6%. At those sizes the bot could lose every other trade and still finish up. I had Grok build a perps bot that trades both ways on XRP, DOGE, LINK, UNI and ATOM. It waits for the candles to confirm direction, sets the take-profit before entry and exits exactly there. Leverage runs 8x to 19x depending on how far price has to go, and a strong signal gets about half the balance. The five big closes, all at their TP: - XRP short at 19x, 1.3687 → 1.2948, 99% on margin - UNI short at 14x, 7.685 → 7.132, 97% - LINK short at 19x, 12.832 → 11.985, 121% - ATOM long at 17x, 1.5690 → 1.6961, 133% - DOGE short at 13x, 0.08715 → 0.07948, 110% That’s where the asymmetry comes from. On the big trades the upside was fixed before entry. On the small ones a hard stop fixed the downside. 18 losing trades all session, and every one of them was small. Take DOGE. 0.08715 down to 0.07948 is an 8.8% drop. At 13x that’s about 114% gross, 110% after costs, and on the balance it had by then it paid $1,254. This ran on real Kraken prices but not on a live account, so it doesn’t prove what real trading would return. And 13x to 19x on half the balance is a serious liquidation risk with real money. Hour 22. $4,328 on the test balance, and the number I’d actually watch with real money isn’t the 90%. It’s 3.2 against 0.6.
0:29

MY GROK BOT TURNED $50 INTO $4,328 IN A TEST RUN WITH A 90% WIN RATE. THE MATH SAYS IT WOULD STILL BE GREEN AT 50% 22 hours. The win rate is the least interesting number in it. Everyone chases win rate. 90% sounds like the whole story. It isn’t. The average win was 3.2% of the balance, the average loss 0.6%. At those sizes the bot could lose every other trade and still finish up. I had Grok build a perps bot that trades both ways on XRP, DOGE, LINK, UNI and ATOM. It waits for the candles to confirm direction, sets the take-profit before entry and exits exactly there. Leverage runs 8x to 19x depending on how far price has to go, and a strong signal gets about half the balance. The five big closes, all at their TP: - XRP short at 19x, 1.3687 → 1.2948, 99% on margin - UNI short at 14x, 7.685 → 7.132, 97% - LINK short at 19x, 12.832 → 11.985, 121% - ATOM long at 17x, 1.5690 → 1.6961, 133% - DOGE short at 13x, 0.08715 → 0.07948, 110% That’s where the asymmetry comes from. On the big trades the upside was fixed before entry. On the small ones a hard stop fixed the downside. 18 losing trades all session, and every one of them was small. Take DOGE. 0.08715 down to 0.07948 is an 8.8% drop. At 13x that’s about 114% gross, 110% after costs, and on the balance it had by then it paid $1,254. This ran on real Kraken prices but not on a live account, so it doesn’t prove what real trading would return. And 13x to 19x on half the balance is a serious liquidation risk with real money. Hour 22. $4,328 on the test balance, and the number I’d actually watch with real money isn’t the 90%. It’s 3.2 against 0.6.

tenzo

61,911 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

This trader turned $76 into +$4,304 with a single bet on the weather market! Account: His PnL in March: -$1,000. His PnL now: +$12,000. Best trades: $76 -> $4,304 $19 -> $1,370 $52 -> $1,016 Main strategy: buying low-probability outcomes. This approach can lead to 50 losses in a row, but weather markets are full of inefficiencies. That’s why he sticks to his strategy, and in the end it pays off. With this approach, win rate doesn’t matter. One successful 1¢ trade can generate huge profit even if the previous 49 trades were losses. Simple math. The lower the probability of the outcome, the smaller his position size. Perfect use of the Kelly Criterion allows him to avoid going negative from incorrect sizing. Result: +$10,000 in just one month! To profit from this strategy, just set up copy trading on his account:
0:26

This trader turned $76 into +$4,304 with a single bet on the weather market! Account: His PnL in March: -$1,000. His PnL now: +$12,000. Best trades: $76 -> $4,304 $19 -> $1,370 $52 -> $1,016 Main strategy: buying low-probability outcomes. This approach can lead to 50 losses in a row, but weather markets are full of inefficiencies. That’s why he sticks to his strategy, and in the end it pays off. With this approach, win rate doesn’t matter. One successful 1¢ trade can generate huge profit even if the previous 49 trades were losses. Simple math. The lower the probability of the outcome, the smaller his position size. Perfect use of the Kelly Criterion allows him to avoid going negative from incorrect sizing. Result: +$10,000 in just one month! To profit from this strategy, just set up copy trading on his account:

me_cool_off

12,213 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$496,820 on Polymarket Since Apr 5, this wallet has been bringing in about $4,284 per day and running at roughly 36 trades per hour 100,202 predictions in 116 days with a 48% win rate How does an account with a sub-50% win rate still put up nearly $500,000 in PnL? The setup is pretty clear: 1. It operates almost entirely in short crypto “Up / Down” markets and trades them with very fast execution 2. The system looks built around temporal arbitrage, hedged directional exposure, near-resolution capture, and inventory rotation 3. It accumulates one side when probabilities get pushed too far, then completes or rebalances the structure later if the other side offers a cleaner hedge This trader’s Polymarket account: Ox5Of7 Most profitable trades: $205 → $8,905 (+$8,701 +4,254.5%) $89 → $8,434 (+$8,345 +9,378.7%) $21,793 → $29,754 (+$7,961 +36.5%) Its PnL comes from continuously rebuilding and rebalancing the same setup across more than 100,000 short-market entries
0:25

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$496,820 on Polymarket Since Apr 5, this wallet has been bringing in about $4,284 per day and running at roughly 36 trades per hour 100,202 predictions in 116 days with a 48% win rate How does an account with a sub-50% win rate still put up nearly $500,000 in PnL? The setup is pretty clear: 1. It operates almost entirely in short crypto “Up / Down” markets and trades them with very fast execution 2. The system looks built around temporal arbitrage, hedged directional exposure, near-resolution capture, and inventory rotation 3. It accumulates one side when probabilities get pushed too far, then completes or rebalances the structure later if the other side offers a cleaner hedge This trader’s Polymarket account: Ox5Of7 Most profitable trades: $205 → $8,905 (+$8,701 +4,254.5%) $89 → $8,434 (+$8,345 +9,378.7%) $21,793 → $29,754 (+$7,961 +36.5%) Its PnL comes from continuously rebuilding and rebalancing the same setup across more than 100,000 short-market entries

Daniro

22,811 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This Polymarket account is the biggest mystery to me. Joined one week ago. Started with $21 and turned it into $198. Then goes real magic. He was turning every trade into 5-10x clean profit with just one loss. A few hours later he was sitting at $917k PnL. In total he placed 24 trades on $BNB direction. Won 23 of them, almost 100% Win Rate. Cashed out almost a million ($917,893) Then disappeared right after i noticed him and made a public post. Full story + his wallet attached.
0:20

This Polymarket account is the biggest mystery to me. Joined one week ago. Started with $21 and turned it into $198. Then goes real magic. He was turning every trade into 5-10x clean profit with just one loss. A few hours later he was sitting at $917k PnL. In total he placed 24 trades on $BNB direction. Won 23 of them, almost 100% Win Rate. Cashed out almost a million ($917,893) Then disappeared right after i noticed him and made a public post. Full story + his wallet attached.

Dexter's Lab

52,182 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This trader turned -$9,000 into +$87,000 in just 6 days on 5-minute markets! Account: April 29: -$9,000. May 4: +$87,000. Only 83 trades! 58 wins / 25 losses. That’s about +$16,000/day! Best trades: > $5,438 -> $17,113 > $14,029 -> $21,893 > $11,704 -> $18,678 He doesn’t buy low-probability outcomes or grind 1% at 99¢. Most trades are in the 55-69¢ range. Large single trades. Max 23 trades per day. 70% win rate. He doesn’t enter every market - only the ones he’s confident in. This trader reads the market extremely well. That’s his edge. This makes him an ideal account for copy trading. To copy trade him just use the TG bot:
0:22

This trader turned -$9,000 into +$87,000 in just 6 days on 5-minute markets! Account: April 29: -$9,000. May 4: +$87,000. Only 83 trades! 58 wins / 25 losses. That’s about +$16,000/day! Best trades: > $5,438 -> $17,113 > $14,029 -> $21,893 > $11,704 -> $18,678 He doesn’t buy low-probability outcomes or grind 1% at 99¢. Most trades are in the 55-69¢ range. Large single trades. Max 23 trades per day. 70% win rate. He doesn’t enter every market - only the ones he’s confident in. This trader reads the market extremely well. That’s his edge. This makes him an ideal account for copy trading. To copy trade him just use the TG bot:

me_cool_off

18,082 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$563,921 on Polymarket 86,044 predictions in 107 days with a 50% win rate How is this account bringing in about $5,270 per day? The logic is simple: 1. It runs through short crypto “Up / Down” markets at about 34 trades per hour 2. The strategy appears to build positions in stages rather than committing to both outcomes at the same moment 3. When probabilities shift, the model can add the other side at a different level, creating either a hedge or a more favorable combined position This trader’s Polymarket account: Most profitable trades: $4,793 → $12,273 (+$7,480 +156.1%) $10,059 → $16,683 (+$6,624 +65.9%) $2,071 → $8,679 (+$6,608 +319.1%) With a win rate sitting at exactly 50%, the performance appears to come from how the bot structures and adjusts each position
0:25

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$563,921 on Polymarket 86,044 predictions in 107 days with a 50% win rate How is this account bringing in about $5,270 per day? The logic is simple: 1. It runs through short crypto “Up / Down” markets at about 34 trades per hour 2. The strategy appears to build positions in stages rather than committing to both outcomes at the same moment 3. When probabilities shift, the model can add the other side at a different level, creating either a hedge or a more favorable combined position This trader’s Polymarket account: Most profitable trades: $4,793 → $12,273 (+$7,480 +156.1%) $10,059 → $16,683 (+$6,624 +65.9%) $2,071 → $8,679 (+$6,608 +319.1%) With a win rate sitting at exactly 50%, the performance appears to come from how the bot structures and adjusts each position

Daniro

45,237 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$212,121 on Polymarket 146,603 predictions in 267 days with a 42% win rate How is this account bringing in about $794 per day? The logic is simple: 1. It trades short crypto “Up / Down” markets at around 23 trades per hour 2. The bot enters markets in several steps instead of placing the entire position at once 3. It can take one outcome first, then wait for the probabilities to shift before adding the opposite side at a better moment 4. Part of the position can then become hedged, while the remaining shares stay exposed to the outcome the model still favors This trader’s Polymarket account: pspspsps5 Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this bot: Most profitable trades: $372 → $1,650 (+$1,278 +344.1%) $24 → $1,207 (+$1,183 +4,899.9%) $403 → $1,393 (+$990 +245.8%) The real edge is in how aggressively the bot can reuse the same setup across thousands of short crypto windows without needing a high win rate
0:25

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$212,121 on Polymarket 146,603 predictions in 267 days with a 42% win rate How is this account bringing in about $794 per day? The logic is simple: 1. It trades short crypto “Up / Down” markets at around 23 trades per hour 2. The bot enters markets in several steps instead of placing the entire position at once 3. It can take one outcome first, then wait for the probabilities to shift before adding the opposite side at a better moment 4. Part of the position can then become hedged, while the remaining shares stay exposed to the outcome the model still favors This trader’s Polymarket account: pspspsps5 Follow this account and trade on Polymarket through this bot: Most profitable trades: $372 → $1,650 (+$1,278 +344.1%) $24 → $1,207 (+$1,183 +4,899.9%) $403 → $1,393 (+$990 +245.8%) The real edge is in how aggressively the bot can reuse the same setup across thousands of short crypto windows without needing a high win rate

Daniro

11,647 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

After 115 winning trades in a row with my Polymarket bot, I finally got my first loss. 116 trades total, 115 wins at +1.5%, 1 loss. I honestly didn’t think it could happen, but every downside comes with an upside. Thanks to this loss, I realized I could integrate a stop-loss into the bot. Instead of risking a full loss and losing 100% of the traded amount, I can now cap losses to 20–30% per trade. That’s a good improvement compared to the current setup. Current PnL: > 115 wins at 1.5% → +170% > 1 loss → -100%, but from now on each loss should be limited to -20–30% max A lot of people say that since Polymarket added fees to the 15-minute markets, targeting 1.5% doesn’t make sense anymore. I won’t go into details, but my implementation avoids paying those fees, and actually earns more now because I receive them instead. For the few who already have the bot, I’ll push the stop-loss update later today. If you’re interested in the bot or the logic, feel free to DM me. I don’t want to share it publicly for now to avoid losing the edge.
1:03

After 115 winning trades in a row with my Polymarket bot, I finally got my first loss. 116 trades total, 115 wins at +1.5%, 1 loss. I honestly didn’t think it could happen, but every downside comes with an upside. Thanks to this loss, I realized I could integrate a stop-loss into the bot. Instead of risking a full loss and losing 100% of the traded amount, I can now cap losses to 20–30% per trade. That’s a good improvement compared to the current setup. Current PnL: > 115 wins at 1.5% → +170% > 1 loss → -100%, but from now on each loss should be limited to -20–30% max A lot of people say that since Polymarket added fees to the 15-minute markets, targeting 1.5% doesn’t make sense anymore. I won’t go into details, but my implementation avoids paying those fees, and actually earns more now because I receive them instead. For the few who already have the bot, I’ll push the stop-loss update later today. If you’re interested in the bot or the logic, feel free to DM me. I don’t want to share it publicly for now to avoid losing the edge.

The Smart Ape 🔥

55,506 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Paul Tudor Jones on the simple math of winning: "i can actually be a complete imbecile. i can be wrong 80% of the time, and i'm still not going to lose" in this interview, Paul Tudor Jones explains the real secret to surviving the market: only taking trades where the upside is massive compared to your risk. when you make 5 times what you risk on a trade, you can literally lose five times, win just once, and still break even. the pros do not care about ego or win rate. they cut their losses fast and let their winning trades run to the moon stop trying to be right every time. focus on how much you make when you win bookmark and watch the video below
31:57

Paul Tudor Jones on the simple math of winning: "i can actually be a complete imbecile. i can be wrong 80% of the time, and i'm still not going to lose" in this interview, Paul Tudor Jones explains the real secret to surviving the market: only taking trades where the upside is massive compared to your risk. when you make 5 times what you risk on a trade, you can literally lose five times, win just once, and still break even. the pros do not care about ego or win rate. they cut their losses fast and let their winning trades run to the moon stop trying to be right every time. focus on how much you make when you win bookmark and watch the video below

ludoonchart

94,276 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce