正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Squawk Switch! (FlyDubai Boeing 737 MAX Diversion to Tabuk) Follow for more! 👤 Map via flightradar24 🗺️ Original Commentary by Pete the Irish Pilot 🎙️ #aviation #FlyDubai #Boeing737MAX #Diversion #AvGeek

146,757 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

3 条评论

لافي الركابي 的头像
لافي الركابي1 天前

Fact check..! Incorrect details regarding the flydubia flight diversion to tabuk. The airplane experienced an internal cockpit dispute between the pilot and the co-pilot, which prompted an emergency landing at Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz Airport in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. It is (completely false) that the Israeli Air Force escorted the aircraft. As the flight path was almost entirely within Saudi airspace and a minor portion of Jordanian airspace, any immediate reaction and protection protocol fell strictly under the sovereignty and jurisdiction of the Royal Saudi Air Force, whose quick-reaction interceptors secured the aircraft through Saudi skies until it safely landed.

Manuel Rebolledo 的头像
Manuel Rebolledo1 天前

@Donpatoinfowars el recorrido del avión

الرد 的头像
الرد1 天前

شي غريب كيف ادخل في الطائره آله حاده اين التفتيش في المطار ومعروف ان اجهزة التفتيش في دبي اجهزه متطوره جدا !! وايضا كانت الطائره قريبه من الاردن لماذا هبطت في تبوك ؟؟

相关视频

BREAKING: flydubai FZ1073, Dubai to Tel Aviv Nobody kicked that cockpit door in. That line is already racing around the internet. It is also the wrong line. A Boeing 737 MAX flight-deck door is certified so people in the cabin cannot force it open. If anyone from the cabin got onto that deck over northwest Saudi Arabia, one of two things happened. Someone inside unlocked it. Or a crewmember who knew the airline emergency code typed it, the 30-to-60-second timer ran out, and nobody hit DENY before the five-second unlock window. Random passengers do not know that code. Deadheading company pilots do. Flydubai itself says on-duty company crew already travelling on the flight secured the aircraft and landed it. Here is what is solid. On 30th September 2026, flight FZ1073 left Dubai at 03:05 UTC for Tel Aviv on a 737 MAX 8 registered A6-FKF. About two hours later the jet left cruise. Flightradar24’s tight sample shows a drop from 30,875 feet to 16,750 feet in 29 seconds. That is more than 14,000 feet in half a minute. A wider window used by CNN and BBC is different: about 17,000 to 17,400 feet net from around 34,000 feet in under two minutes. Those are two measurements, not one dramatic number. The aircraft then climbed, dropped again, and wandered near 15,000 feet. It transmitted squawk 7700, then 7500, then 7700 again. It briefly entered Jordanian airspace, turned back, and landed at Tabuk around 06:45 UTC. Israel scrambled fighters after the unlawful-interference code. Tabuk’s airport operator says both the captain and the co-pilot were hurt and taken to hospital. All passengers were accounted for. There were no passenger fatalities. The airline says there was an altercation in the flight deck and that motives remain under investigation. Here is what is not solid yet. Israeli leaders later described a stabbing and an apparent attempt to crash the aircraft. Early the same day, a PMO spokesman told Reuters it was not believed to be a hijacking. Those are official statements. They are not a closed investigation. Flydubai has not confirmed a knife, a crew nationality, or a motive. Named passenger accounts and TV briefings point toward a fight between the operating pilots, with help from people who then entered the deck. That is the working public story. It is not a charge sheet. Claims that a named first officer carried out a planned political crash, or that civilian passengers alone landed the jet, go past what the operator and the public record have locked down. One timing detail matters. The hard dump starts around 05:21 UTC. The first emergency squawk shows at 05:28:48. Roughly seven minutes. That gap fits a cockpit already in chaos before anyone could reach the transponder. It also fits enough time for an emergency-code cycle. It does not tell you which door path fired. Germanwings is the wrong analogy if you use it as a copy. There, the first officer locked the captain out and the door did what post-9/11 hardening was built for: keep a cabin-side threat outside. On FZ1073 the danger was already inside the protected volume. The two-person rule does not solve two pilots fighting in a closed deck. The residual layer becomes whoever is in the forward cabin with the procedure, and whether anyone inside can still reach DENY. A same-day “second diversion” claim on another flydubai Tel Aviv flight was a tracking glitch. Strip that off the pile. So the honest ultra is not a hero movie and not a finished terror verdict. It is this: a violent flight-deck altercation on an Israel-bound jet, an extreme altitude excursion on public ADS-B, distress then unlawful-interference codes, a safe landing at Tabuk with both pilots hospitalised, an airline that still says motives are unknown, and a cockpit door that could only have opened by the system’s own allowed paths, not by force. The hard lesson is not “build a thicker door.” It is what happens when the last safety layer is a timer, a code, and the people sitting just outside.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

717,918 次观看 • 1 天前