Stablecoins improve the dollar's transportation, Bitcoin challenges its monetary policy "The rise of stablecoins does not prove that Bitcoin failed. It proves that Bitcoin and stablecoins solve entirely different problems." "Stablecoins are optimized for spending, settlement and short-term stability. Bitcoin is optimized for scarcity, ownership and long-term independence from... any issuer. Stablecoins promise one dollar tomorrow. Bitcoin refuses to promise a dollar price at all." "Stablecoins are the internet's checking account. Bitcoin is its savings account. One is built to move, the other is built to last." "If you are paying an invoice next week, volatility is a problem and a stablecoin may be useful. If you're trying to protect savings across decades from monetary expansion, that promise to track the dollar may be the problem." "Stablecoins improve the dollar's transportation. Bitcoin challenges the dollar's monetary policy."show more

This clip is brought to you by @hodlwithLedn

Bitcoin removes monetary dependence from the savings equation

slimy smarmy shifty eyes scott is My opinion of course

$300 billion market and 98 percent of it is the currency this was meant to replace

Stablecoins optimize the movement of existing money; Bitcoin changes the rules of the asset itself. Adoption looks different when transport and monetary policy are separated.

stablecoins transport dollars efficiently

Short $VTHO 0.0006863

checking account vs savings account is actually a solid way to put it

stablecoins move dollars efficiently

Better I couldn't explain it myself. Well done.

The savings-account analogy needs one caveat: scarce supply doesn’t guarantee purchasing power when you need to sell. Bitcoin removes an issuer’s ability to create more units, but demand still sets the price. Your spending timeline matters as much as scarcity.

Well said: stablecoins move dollars; Bitcoin challenges monetary policy. @AdamJohnstph, you’re at my feed’s top.