Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 STADIUM HEAT – GROUPS A B C D COMPILATION 🔥 The first four groups delivered… and so did their supporters. No mercy, no personal space. Group A: Mexico, South Korea, South Africa, Czechia Group B: Switzerland, Canada, Bosnia, Qatar Group C: Scotland, Brazil, Morocco, Haiti Group D: United...

202,857 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

BATTLE PLAN: Join my registered third party campaign group to fight Mark Carney I've launched a registered third party campaign called For Canada to aggressively oppose Mark Carney in the upcoming April 28 election, using uncapped donations to fund hard-hitting ads and tactics beyond what political parties can do. The election has been called for April 28th. We’ve got five weeks to expose Mark Carney, to vet him, and to show Canadians who he really is: ⚫️a Canadian in name only who hasn’t lived here in a decade; ⚫️a globalist who carries three passports and calls himself “European”, not Canadian; ⚫️an insider who rigged the Liberal leadership vote to disqualify his opponents and block 250,000 voters; ⚫️an oligarch who pledged his loyalty to the World Economic Forum and the United Nations; and ⚫️a slippery banker who, just weeks ago, voted to move his own company from Canada to New York. So we’ve got our work cut out for us as journalists. But I’m doing something different this time: I’ve set up what Elections Canada calls a “third party” campaign to fight against Mark Carney directly. By registering my third party group with Elections Canada, I can raise and spend up to $600,000 in this election. That’s enough to do everything from renting a billboard truck, to sending out brochures targeting different politicians, to running national TV ads. And the amazing thing about a third party campaign, I’ve discovered, is that unlike political parties, there is no limit on how much people can donate to it. Canadians can donate a maximum of $1,750 to each registered party, and the same towards each party’s candidates. Those limits don’t apply to third party groups. So you can donate any amount — and that’s on top of whatever you might give to a political party. There’s going to be a lot of ads out there, including from the Conservative Party. I have no interest in simply repeating their messages: I plan to use my third party group to go further and harder than anything the Conservatives would do, including talking about things the Conservatives might be squeamish about. For example, Mark Carney’s close family ties with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficker. The CBC would never talk about that; and I’m not sure if the Conservatives would, either. But we already are — our billboard truck is literally in Ottawa today with that message. I didn’t plan to do this. The idea actually came to me from the police who were interrogating me for publishing my book “The Libranos” in the 2019 election. They said all I had to do was “register” my book with the government and I’d be fine. I thought that was an outrageous infringement of my freedom of speech, and I fought it for five years in court. That’s banana republic stuff. But then it dawned on me: registering in the election lets me campaign as if I were a political party — including raising and spending money. In some ways, that gives me even more power than a political party — because there are no limits on individual donors. So I’m doing it. I’m setting up a campaign group. We’ve got five weeks to stop Mark Carney. Rebel News will do important work. But this third party group will do other work that Rebel News can’t. I’ve set up this third party group in my personal capacity, to keep the funds separate from Rebel News. Rebel will do journalism; this third party group (I’m calling it For Canada) will do the political work. Donations to third party groups like For Canada are unlimited — the only limit is on our spending. But that limit is so high — $600,000 — it really is amazing. Click here to help me reach that goal! I’ve made the first donation. Will you join me?

Rebel News

173,303 просмотров • 1 год назад

Kayaknya ini lagu Piala Dunia 2026 versi AI, nyebutin 48 negara dan nama pemain.. tapi kok enak juga yak 😅 liriknya kira-kira begini.. One game! One world! Let's go! USA, Pulisic on the run. Mexico, Jimenez, here we come. Canada, Davies wear the crown. Argentina, Messi don't back down. Brazil, Vinicius feel the heat. Colombia, James the golden beat. Ecuador, Caicedo drive it through. Paraguay, Almiron we see you. Uruguay, Valverde rise and shine. The Americas, we draw the line. Every star, every fall, every tear on this road, was building the fire, was carrying the load. Now the world holds its breath, we're ready to go. One fire burning in every soul. One game, one ball, one goal. From Mexico to Montreal, we bleed the same. We love the same, beautiful game. One fire, fire, fire. Every nation, every street. Feel your heart, feel the beat. One world, let's go. One fire, let's go. One world, let's spread. Mbappe light the way. Spain, Pedri born to play. Portugal, Ronaldo never done. England, Bellingham we just begun. Germany, Wirtz electric flow. Netherlands, Van Dijk still the show. Belgium, Lukaku hear him roar. Austria, Sabitzer give us more. Switzerland, Xhaka iron will. Turkey, Guler magic still. One fire burning in every soul. One game, one ball, one goal. From Mexico to Montreal, we bleed the same. We love the same, beautiful game. One fire, fire, fire. Every nation, every street. Feel your heart, feel the beat. One world, let's go. One fire, let's go. One world, let's spread. Croatia, Modric, 40 strong. Serbia, Vlahovic all along. Denmark, Eriksen, rise again. Scotland, McTominay, feel the rain. Bosnia, Dzeko, old gold heart. Czechia, Soucek, play your part. Europe speaks with 40 tongues, but one fire, fills all of our lungs. Japan, Minamino, Eastern fire. South Korea, Son, climbing higher. Iran, Taremi, never fold. Uzbekistan, Shomurodov, the bold. Jordan, Al-Naimat, make your mark. Australia, Leckie, light the dark. Qatar, Ali, 60 goals. Saudi Arabia, Al-Dawsari, lips of souls. Morocco, Brahim Diaz, pure glass. Algeria, Mahrez, built to last. Egypt, Salah, King of Kings. Ghana, party here in rings. Senegal, Mane, heart of gold. Tunisia, Hannibal, brave and bold. Cape Verde, Rodrigues, island pride. Dark Congo, Mbemba, stand beside. Mali, Bissouma, lead the way. Africa is here to stay. Panama, Carrasquilla. Honduras, Elis. Rising star, Haiki. Nazo, [samar gak kedengeran]. Curacao, Martina. New Zealand, Wood, across the sea. A rock who's same, proud and free. 48 nations, 48 fires, one ball, one pitch, one dream that never tires. One fire burning in every soul. One game, one ball, one goal. From Mexico to Montreal, we bleed the same. We love the same, beautiful game. One fire, fire, fire. Every nation, every street. Feel your heart, feel the beat. One world, let's go.

King Purwa

82,256 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: Sec. Marco Rubio just walked right up to the mic at the Board of Peace and said it PERFECTLY on Trump circumventing the globalists! "We are here today because the President of the United States Donald J. Trump has both an ability and a willingness to use the power of his office to think OUTSIDE THE BOX." 🔥 "And that's why we're here. This was a very unique crisis in Gaza, one that the existing international institutions could not solve or figure out." "It needed a very specific type solution that required the partnership of all the nations that are here, including those that are here on an observer status." "This Gaza situation was impossible to solve under orthodoxy, under existing structures. And so what we did is they went to the UN and they got the UN's approval to put this group together and bring these nations together to come up with a very specific solution, solutions to very unique and specific problem. We have a long ways to go." "There's a lot of work that remains that will require the contribution of every nation state represented here today and we thank you for being a part of it." "And I hope this can serve as a model for other complex and difficult situations so they can be solved in the same way." "But right now the focus is on this one. We have to get this right. There is no plan B for Gaza. Plan B is going back to war." "No one here wants that. Plan A, the only path forward, is one that rebuilds Gaza in a way of enduring and sustainable peace where everyone can live their side by side with one another and never worry again about returning to conflict, to war, to human suffering, and to destruction." "Mr. President, thank you for having the vision and the courage to pursue something that has never been done before." "Every one of you is indispensable, including our observer partners, who we hope can find your way to join us at some point as officially part of this. But we are grateful for the fact you're here today and the contributions you've made already. Thank you." WELL-SAID, MARCO!

Eric Daugherty

676,297 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

And here it is — The Pizza Man. The Inflation Reduction Act: the largest money laundering operation in United States history — and in the history of the world. The Republican Oversight Investigation: CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, The BIDEN-HARRIS TERRORIST ORGANIZATION through the “Inflation Reduction Act” using American tax payers money to fund DOMESTIC TERRORISM on United States soil in the name of the greatest criminal conspiracy ever perpetrated on humanity, Climate Change, “In fact, there’s been a recent rush to get this money out. And that’s because they know there’s a likelihood that the administration will change to come November 2024. And thank God it did. And here is the follow the money, A: Climate Justice: $100 million to one terrorist organization to glorify another, Hamas, B: NDN Collective: $100 million to defund law enforcement and obliterate the United States military. C: NY Immigration Coalition/NJ Alliance for Immigrant Justice: $50 million for open borders and annihilate citizenship. D: Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs: $50 million to abolish police and abolish prisons. E: Ella Baker Center for Humam Rights: $1 to $3 million to defund the police, decriminalize shoplifting and abolish prisons. “I'm going to say that Vice President Harris…is quoted here, ‘I put equity at the center of our nation's largest investment in climate in history, to reach the organizations that know their community best.’ That's what she said when they rolled out and actually named these terror organizations.” In other words: Pizza Man is overseeing a $375 billion climate slush fund — billions of which are being laundered to foreign and domestic terror organizations disguised as charities, with no federal filings and zero public accountability. — Pizza Man extorted $20 billion for environmental groups — some of which were created just months before receiving the funds. — Pizza Man extorted $7 billion for a Maryland climate group that doesn’t even appear in the IRS database. — Pizza Man extorted $2 billion for Stacey Abrams, after her organization had only been able to raise a whopping one hundred dollars. 📝 This is the definition of RICO — racketeering. By the way: DHS Kristy Noem: The Maui fires under the Biden FEMA, 1 in 6 survivor’s had to Trade SEXUAL FAVORS for basic supplies to survive. Meanwhile, illegal aliens were staying in $300 per night luxury hotels, using FEMA dollars. Meanwhile, after Hurricane Helene, FEMA ran out of money because FEMA spent over $1 BILLION on illegals. Mayorkas “FEMA is out of money and can't make it through hurricane season.” “We do not have the funds" Additionally, after Hurricane Milton hit, houses with Trump signs were ignored.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

264,440 просмотров • 1 год назад

EXCLUSIVE: HONG KONG ANTI-CHINA GROUPS AWASH WITH MYSTERY CASH Investigators found millions of dollars delivered to Stand News "in a clandestine manner", a court heard. The loss-making anti-China media outlet in Hong Kong suddenly went from deep debt to having millions in spare cash. The discovery, revealed in court recently, is an example of how China-hostile groups in Hong Kong acquired donations equivalent to tens of millions of US dollars between 2014 and 2020. The G-7's Financial Action Task Force warned during this period that crowdfunding donations had become the new way for clandestine funders to transfer cash around the world at high speed without being traceable, with the cash sometimes used for terrorism--which is what happened in Hong Kong. . CROWDFUNDED TERRORISM In a case in point, a mysterious woman came to visit a Hong Kong protest group called Dragon Slayers Brigade and gave them instructions on where and when to set up a crowdfunding bid. They did so – and money quickly poured into their bank account, more than they could use. After setting up a Molotov cocktail factory, obtaining an AR15 assault rifle and financing a team of staff, leader Wong Chun-keung gave himself a stress-relief break in which he spent some of the funds on football betting. “I used about HK$300,000 [US$40,000] of the donations to gamble. For me, it was a way to de-stress,” he told a court. The suddenly wealthy group obtained high grade explosives and planned a terrorist-level bombing in Wan Chai which would have caused massive casualties, had police not stopped them hours before they set the bombs off. . CELEBRATING VIOLENCE The anti-China Stand News carried interviews with members of the Dragon Slayers Brigade, presenting them positively and "romanticizing" their violent mission, a court heard. In fact, it has become clear that money is the key to fully understanding the protests in Hong Kong. From 2014 onwards, anti-government activists and anti-China media groups found themselves awash with cash. These tens of millions of dollars were in addition to the tens of millions handed out in Hong Kong since 1994 by the National Endowment for Democracy, a US group specializing in overseas political interference "to advance US interests". The cash is also in addition to the secret sum of US$2 million set aside for the Hong Kong protests by America's Open Technology Fund, a unit of Radio Free Asia, a Washington DC "news" outlet. And it is in addition to the millions of dollars known to have been handed out to anti-China activists by Mark Simon, a one-time US intelligence officer working for Jimmy Lai's Apple Daily. TOO MUCH, TOO FAST While most crowdfunding activities are legitimate and harmless, examples in which large sums of money are moved in a highly charged political atmosphere are suspect, particularly if the money arrives very quickly, investigators said. Hong Kong journalists watched one anti-China group in the city obtain a large sum of cash at high speed using crowdfunding in August of 2019. "A new gofundme campaign created yesterday has raised over US$1.97m in two hours this morning," amazed journalists at Hong Kong's Dimsum Daily reported. This was extraordinary, not just because of the speed, but because the group was virtually unknown. Called "Freedom Hong Kong", it supported a gathering of protesters under the slogan "Alliance of United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong, sovereignty lies with the people". It presented itself as Hong Kong people calling for western nations to impose sanctions on their own community. This made no sense, but since the crowdfunding sites were in the US, police could not trace the origin of the funds. Hong Kong journalists noted that Freedom Hong Kong was registered in the United States. . STAND NEWS MONEY MYSTERY The donations money-transfer technique can be traced back a decade. In 2014, an anti-China media group called House News, which attracted too little advertising and was losing $600,000 a month, closed down. But six months later, it relaunched itself as Stand News. It still had almost no advertising, but was suddenly cash rich, through "donations". When the media outlet wiped its website and stopped posting material, investigators found a reserve cash account containing HK$61 million (US$8 million): an extraordinary amount of spare cash for a non-profit website without a functioning business model. . APPLE DAILY PUZZLE Similarly, Stand News' former partner Apple Daily was losing more than HK$1 million a day, sometimes twice that, during this period. That means it was losing between US$1 million to US$2 million a week, month after month, year after year. But it always had vast amounts of spare cash in its bank account. Business reporters from other Hong Kong publications openly expressed puzzlement about where Apple Daily's money came from. "We cannot help wonder if its existence were a powerful propaganda machinery…" said business writers at Dimsum Daily. . ANTI-CHINA PROPAGANDA Stand News overseas director was a man named Evan Fowler, who co-founded a China-hostile website called the Hong Kong Free Press, before returning to the UK to work for a hard right group called the Henry Jackson Society. In 2017, that society was revealed by the Times of London to be taking 10,000 pounds a month (more than US$13,000), delivered by Japanese contacts, to spread negative news about China to the mainstream media, including The Sunday Times, The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian and The Economist. . VIOLENCE, HOSTILITY AND CASH It's clear that the key to fully understanding the Hong Kong anti-China movement is cash, and it's easy to find multiple examples. Here are four more: 1) In another Hong Kong court case, a 17-year-old Hong Kong youth arrested for violent protests, revealed to a court that he maintained "a spare flat to keep his bombs in". Hong Kong is literally one of the most expensive places in the world – how can a 17-year-old afford a spare apartment? 2) At yet another court hearing, an anti-China activist called Wayland Chan talked about being given a company by Mark Simon, a former US intelligence agent, working for Apple Daily. Simon told him that the company was of covert nature and could be used to liaise with foreign organizations and collect funds. 3) One group using crowdfunding to attract large sums of money at speed called itself the 612 Humanitarian Relief Fund. A court heard it received HK$270 million (US$34 million) in donations between June 2019 and October 2021, and cash went to anti-China lawyers, international lobbyists, and hostile foreign organizations. Two of its trustees were directors of Stand News, and one worked with the "revolution industry", a cluster of hybrid warfare consultants which uses street protests to promote US interests. Not Hong Kong interests, US interests. 4) In yet another case, HSBC in 2019 closed the accounts of a group called Spark Alliance, which also claimed that the HK$80 million (US$10.3 million) in their account came from crowdfunding. That group presented itself as a noble foundation providing support for arrested protesters. But investigators found the account was managed by an 18-year-old involved in drug trafficking, with some cash withdrawn and spent on unrelated items. . FALSE NARRATIVE Why is the narrative you see about Hong Kong in the media so different to the truth? The western press is doing its job, which is to demonize China to manufacture consent for the US to go to war against a developing country which is daring to rise peacefully. That doesn't mean that individual western journalists are necessarily bad people. Some probably really believe that America is a wonderful country that wouldn't dream of interfering in politics outside its own borders, and that the Chinese are warlike people who will shortly invade Australia as a prelude to taking over the world. All the rest of us can do is to try to present a fairer picture of what's going on and hope the truth will spread.

Nury Vittachi

121,115 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇿🇦🇺🇸 BOZELL TEARS SOUTH AFRICA'S DEATH-CHANT LIE WIDE OPEN – "KILL THE BOER" IS HATE SPEECH, FULL STOP‼️ 13 March 2026 🔴 AMBASSADOR LEO BRENT BOZELL III THE DIPLOMAT WHO FORCED SOUTH AFRICA'S SHAME INTO GLOBAL VIEW South Africa is exposed. No more hiding. No more pretending. U.S. Ambassador Leo Brent Bozell III has ripped the mask off the ANC regime's grotesque double standards. On March 11 2026 at the BizNews conference in Hermanus Western Cape Bozell delivered the truth without apology. The chant "Kill the Boer Kill the Farmer" is hate speech. He declared it plainly: "I'm sorry. I don't care what your courts say. It's hate speech." Those words detonated because they named what the ANC has spent years burying. A political slogan that explicitly calls for the murder of whites is legally shielded as "historical expression" in South Africa while every other nation would prosecute it as incitement to violence. Bozell did not attack South Africa. He refused to participate in the delusion. The ANC's response was instant cowardly fury. They issued a demarche summoned the ambassador demanded he explain his "undiplomatic remarks". The same regime that tolerates Julius Malema leading crowds in death chants suddenly pretends to be offended by honesty. Their outrage is not diplomacy. It is panic at being seen for what they are. Bozell clarified on X and expressed regret over the sharp phrasing of "I don't care what your courts say" but maintained his personal view that the chant is hate speech shared by many South Africans while reaffirming that the United States respects South Africa's judicial independence. That diplomatic refinement does not dilute the initial strike. The truth landed. The pretense is shattered. 🔴 PAPENFUS DELIVERS A MERCILESS TAKEDOWN ON ENCA The fire spread the next day. In a scorching eNCA interview around March 12 2026 NEASA CEO Gerhard Papenfus obliterated the government's narrative. His argument was brutal and unanswerable. A public call to kill a racial or ethnic group is hate speech and criminal incitement everywhere else on earth. In the United States in Europe in any society with real rule of law you shout it and you are arrested charged and likely denied bail. Papenfus asked the killer question: "Ask anyone in the world is that hate speech?" He answered: "Only in South Africa does a judge rule that a call to kill a particular group is somehow not hate speech." He spoke from raw experience as the son of a farmer whose parents survived farm attacks. He quoted Malema's own repeated clarifications: the chant targets white people white farmers. The intent is not hidden. It is screamed at rallies. Papenfus dropped the bombshell. He was present when U.S. officials told South African representatives the chant must stop as a condition for improved relations. Bozell is not rogue. He is the messenger of official Washington policy. The interviewer pushed the Constitutional Court ruling and "historical context". Papenfus crushed it. Malema means killing whites. The ANC's demarche against Bozell is childish immature desperate. A regime cornered and flailing. 🔴 THE FIVE CLEAR U.S. DEMANDS PRETORIA IGNORES WITH CONTEMPT Bozell's intervention rests on five explicit U.S. demands delivered nearly a year ago and met with arrogant silence: Publicly condemn the "Kill the Boer" chant and all rhetoric that incites racial hatred or glorifies violence. Prioritise rural crime and farm murders to protect vulnerable farming communities. Reconsider the Expropriation Act enabling land seizures without compensation. Reform Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment policies imposing heavy compliance burdens on foreign investors and minorities while deterring capital. Adopt genuine non-alignment in foreign policy and distance from regimes like Iran. These are practical conditions for trust investment and basic decency. Pretoria's refusal to engage is deliberate defiance. Bozell warned patience is exhausted. Consequences are mounting. 🔴 SOUTH AFRICA THE GLOBAL OUTLIER THAT SHIELDS A RACIAL DEATH CHANT South Africa's judiciary has created a legal monstrosity. The 2022 Johannesburg Equality Court reversal the 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal framing the chant as symbolic struggle poetry the Constitutional Court's March 2025 refusal to hear AfriForum's appeal. All protect a chant calling for racial murder as political speech. This is indefensible worldwide. In the United States it fails Brandenburg v. Ohio incitement tests. In Europe it triggers hate speech prosecution. UN standards prohibit advocacy of racial hatred inciting violence. Public opinion rejects the farce. Polls show 53 percent of South Africans call it hate speech rising to 85 percent among whites. Even some EFF supporters admit it is irresponsible. Malema's own words confirm targeting whites. Yet the ANC shields the poison while punishing Bozell. EFF radicals called for his expulsion declaring him persona non grata branding his comments arrogant threats and interference in South Africa's affairs. The hypocrisy is nauseating. 🔴 THE SAVAGE BRUTALITY FARMERS FACE WHILE PRETORIA PLAYS DENIAL While courts debate metaphors farmers suffer horrors. Attacks feature extreme cruelty hacked with pangas tortured mercilessly mutilated murdered far beyond theft motives. SAPS claims low numbers such as 6 murders in farming communities in Q4 2024/2025 (January to March 2025) with victims including employees farm dwellers and farmers many non-white. AfriForum disputes under-reporting highlights gratuitous torture without economic motive challenges figures like presenting evidence of eight farm owner murders in a quarter where police reported only one. Recent Western Cape incidents prove the nightmare continues. Government insists "random crime" affecting all groups. Courts protect the chant cheering killers. Rhetoric normalises hatred. Brutality escalates. Whites endure targeted terror without equivalent calls from their side. 🔴 TRUMP'S RESPONSE A REFUGEE PROGRAM SIGNALING GLOBAL CONCERN President Trump has acted decisively. Executive Order 14204 signed February 7 2025 halts aid over race-based land policies discriminatory practices and egregious actions while prioritises Afrikaner resettlement through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for those fleeing unjust racial discrimination including racially discriminatory property confiscation. FY 2026 global refugee cap is a historic low of 7500 heavily allocated to South Africans with processing targets up to 4500 applications monthly at peaks though backlogs and pauses slow flow. Early groups included around 59 in May 2025 by early 2026 numbers build into the low thousands admitted or in process. This is not exaggeration. It is Washington acknowledging danger the ANC denies. 🔴 THE ANC A PATHETIC REGIME THAT ATTACKS TRUTH-TELLERS AND ENABLES POISON The ANC follows its tired playbook. Attack messengers summon Bozell lecture on etiquette accuse disrespect of courts and history. Pathetic. None erases the central obscenity. A chant demanding farmers be killed echoes at rallies while the ruling party refuses condemnation. EFF allies push exclusionary transformation BEE as investment barriers land grabs ignoring constitutional equality courts follow the party line. The FW de Klerk Foundation calls rulings shocking endorsements of incitement. Critics warn of a hatred tinderbox with unidirectional protection for majority speech over minorities. Inaction on brutality inflammatory language leaves vulnerable communities in perpetual fear. 🔴 THE ILLUSION HAS COLLAPSED SOUTH AFRICA IS FULLY EXPOSED Bozell did not invent the crisis. He exposed it. His words amplified by Papenfus's ruthless television demolition have stripped away every pretense. South Africa can no longer pretend death chants are poetry farm terror is mere crime racial policies are pure justice. History will record this moment not as American arrogance but as the day the ANC's rotten facade crumbled. One ambassador refused the lie. The world now sees South Africa clearly. Exposed. Indefensible. Impossible to unsee. 🔴 EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER AND STATEMENT OF OPINION This article is presented as political commentary, analysis, and opinion on matters of public interest. It reflects the author’s interpretation and critique of publicly reported events, political rhetoric, government policy, media interviews, and statements made by public figures in the context of ongoing political debate. All individuals, organisations, institutions, and political parties referenced in this article are public figures or entities involved in public governance, political discourse, or matters of public policy. References to such persons or entities relate solely to their public roles and actions that are already part of the public record or widely reported in the media. Any quotations attributed to individuals are drawn from publicly available sources, media reports, interviews, speeches, or widely circulated public statements and are reproduced in good faith for purposes of commentary and analysis. The views, characterisations, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this article represent the author’s personal opinions and analytical perspective regarding matters of public concern. They are not intended to be interpreted as definitive statements of fact, legal conclusions, or allegations of criminal conduct against any individual or institution unless explicitly supported by publicly documented evidence. Strong language, rhetorical expressions, and critical commentary are used as part of political opinion and public debate regarding governance, policy, and political conduct. Such language should be understood within the context of protected democratic discourse and not as literal factual claims. Nothing in this article is intended to advocate violence, discrimination, or hostility toward any individual, group, or community. The article critiques political rhetoric, policies, and governance decisions as part of a broader discussion about freedom of expression, democratic accountability, and public policy. Statistics, legal references, and policy descriptions mentioned in this article are based on publicly reported information available at the time of writing. Readers are encouraged to consult multiple sources, official records, and judicial decisions in forming their own views on the issues discussed. By reading or sharing this article, readers acknowledge that it forms part of an ongoing public debate concerning political leadership, public policy, and freedom of expression, and that the content should be understood as opinion and commentary within that context.

I ❤️ Cape Town ~ I Stand with Russia🇷🇺 MAGA

13,907 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I agree with Trevor Noah’s analysis of the immigration debate in South Africa, and I also agree with Julius Malema’s noble desire for Africa to be one. From the outset, I must be clear that the biggest obstacle to African unity has been African leadership. Some of our countries have been independent for more than 60 years, yet we are still far from achieving the level of integration many Pan-Africanists envisioned. The failure to get there is fundamentally a leadership issue. I want to focus on what Julius Malema has said. He is one of the continent’s most outspoken Pan-Africanists, and his vision of a more united Africa is both admirable and inspiring. Unfortunately, because of the dysfunctionality of leadership across much of the continent, Pan-Africanism has, in some circles in South Africa, become a dirty word. That is a tragedy because the principle itself is not the problem. The problem is that many African leaders have failed to create the political, economic, and institutional conditions necessary to make that vision a reality. So let us look carefully at what Julius Malema is saying. I have great respect for Julius Malema when it comes to his Pan-African outlook, but I am afraid to say that the idea of an Africa with one passport, one currency, and a fully integrated political and economic system is unlikely to happen within our lifetime. It is good to dream and to idealise the kind of Africa we would like to see, but in its current political and economic format, the continent is nowhere near achieving that goal. I am 55 years old, so when I talk about a lifetime, I am talking about the next 25 years. If I live to 80, that would be wonderful, but I do not believe Africa will achieve that level of integration within that timeframe. The reason is quite simple. If you look at the European Union, countries do not simply join because they want to. They must first meet a long list of requirements and benchmarks. These include economic standards, institutional capacity, governance standards, judicial independence, and human rights protections. Even if we set aside the human rights question in Africa, because we know that remains a long journey, the economic question alone presents a major obstacle. A truly united continent can only emerge if its member states are led by competent, educated, and trustworthy leaders who build functioning economies capable of providing opportunities for their own citizens. The current xenophobic, Afrophobic, and anti-immigration discourse taking place in South Africa is often crude and sometimes ugly. However, stripped of the crudeness, there is an important point being raised that cannot simply be ignored. For Africans to unite successfully, they cannot first unite in one country. They must first unite across the continent by creating broadly comparable economic opportunities and living standards. For example, a Ghanaian should be able to travel to Zimbabwe visa-free. That is largely a political decision. But if that Ghanaian wants to relocate permanently to Zimbabwe, then the economies of Ghana and Zimbabwe should have a reasonable degree of parity. People should not be compelled to migrate primarily because one country is functioning while another is failing. The same applies across the continent. Someone should not feel forced to leave the Democratic Republic of Congo for South Africa purely because of economic collapse at home. If integration is driven solely by economics, then the countries that are relatively well managed will inevitably carry the burden of those that are not. This is an intellectual discussion that Africa cannot avoid. Resource competition is often what inflames tensions. If someone moves from a poor community in Mozambique to a poor community in South Africa, both groups are competing for the same clinics, schools, housing, jobs, and social services. That is where tensions arise. Interestingly, illegal immigrants from Europe are rarely part of the immigration debate in South Africa. Many people immediately attribute this to race, but there is another factor that deserves consideration. Wealthy immigrants generally live in affluent communities where there is little or no competition for scarce public resources. Take Chatunga Mugabe, for example. He lived in Hyde Park, drove expensive cars, and socialised in Sandton. Nobody was concerned about his immigration status. Likewise, where I live in South Africa, there are immigrants from the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, Kenya, and elsewhere. They are largely affluent people. The South Africans living there are often excited when newcomers arrive. When I moved from Zimbabwe and bought a house on my road, both black and white South Africans invited me into their homes for dinner and wine. There was no hostility because there was no competition for resources. That reality matters. If Africa is ever going to have one passport and one currency, we must first deal with the economic fundamentals. Most Africans do not realise that this is not primarily a political project. It is an economic one. Turkey, for example, has spent decades seeking membership of the European Union but has not been admitted because it has not met all the requirements. Countries such as Bulgaria and Romania had to meet strict standards before joining. Their judicial systems, governance structures, healthcare systems, and institutions had to reach certain benchmarks. The same logic applies to Africa. If every African citizen were suddenly free to seek healthcare anywhere on the continent, countries with stronger healthcare systems such as South Africa, Botswana, and Namibia would immediately face enormous pressure from people seeking treatment, including specialised care for conditions such as cancer. That is why this discussion is important. We must have it honestly and without slogans. We must discuss it not only in universities and intellectual circles but also in townships, villages, and communities across Africa. The dream of one Africa is a noble one. I support it. But before we get there, we must first address the economic, institutional, and governance realities that stand in the way. Until those challenges are resolved, the vision Julius Malema speaks about will remain an aspiration rather than a practical reality. The tragedy we face today is that we are focusing on the sideshows created by tribalists and rogue political actors who are taking advantage of a genuine problem that exists in South Africa and, indeed, in other parts of Africa as well. We amplify their voices and focus on what they are saying instead of focusing on the real issue. We should be asking ourselves a simple question. Julius Malema is right about the ideal he is advocating, but why are we not getting to where he wants us to get? Once we ask that question honestly, we are forced to examine the root causes. There can be no economic harmony, political harmony, or any other form of harmony between countries that are operating at vastly different levels of development and functionality. Take Zimbabwe and South Africa as an example. Zimbabwe has not had a working radiotherapy machine in its public healthcare system for more than four years. The country’s largest hospital has only one maternity theatre, built in 1977. Then look at South Africa. Its public healthcare system has some problems and could be much better, but by African standards it remains among the most advanced on the continent. If those two countries stand side by side, as they physically do, how do you integrate them when one is dysfunctional and the other remains a functioning state? These are the root causes we need to confront. This discussion must be held in a comprehensive and honest manner, not in fragments. We can speak about the noble aspirations of Pan-Africanism, and we can also discuss the obstacles that stand in its way. Both conversations must be held together. Only then can we identify what needs to be done and begin serious scenario planning around how to get there. Instead, we often get beautiful speeches delivered at the African Union, one of the most ineffective continental organisations in the world. People make grand declarations, earn generous salaries, and then nothing happens. Great speeches have been delivered since the days of the Organisation of African Unity. One of those speeches was even immortalised by Bob Marley in his song War. Yet more than 60 years later, many of the same challenges remain unresolved. That is an indictment not only of African leaders but also of African elites. Too many are content to make money while ignoring the underlying governance failures that hold the continent back. Consider Aliko Dangote, the richest black man in the world and Africa’s most successful entrepreneur. He requires 34 visas to enter dozens of African countries. Yet if I hold a British passport, my movement across much of Africa can often be easier than his. How can Africa speak seriously about integration when one of its own leading business figures faces such barriers within the continent? Until influential African business leaders such as Aliko Dangote, Strive Masiyiwa, Patrice Motsepe, and others begin speaking more forcefully about governance, corruption, economic mismanagement, and state dysfunction, progress will remain slow. As long as these issues are accommodated because money can still be made, Africa will continue to talk about unity without creating the conditions necessary to achieve it. So, back in the townships of South Africa, there is a crisis. I have always said that Zimbabwe is no longer a foreign policy issue. It is a domestic issue because the South African government must deal with its consequences in hospitals, social services, employment, housing, education, and many other facets of daily life. If the South African government does not have the courage to stand up to leaders such as Emmerson Mnangagwa and Mozambique’s President, Daniel Chapo, and say, “The way you are running your economies is creating problems for us,” then the situation will continue to deteriorate. The tragedy is that it is always the poor, the ordinary, and those living in abject poverty who end up fighting amongst themselves. Yet the root causes of these tensions are often created at the highest levels of political leadership. The people competing for jobs, housing, healthcare, and other scarce resources did not create the conditions that led to mass migration. Those conditions were created by policy failures, corruption, poor governance, and economic mismanagement. I would go even further and say that this is also an indictment of South African leadership. SADC already has protocols, principles, and governance frameworks that were specifically designed to prevent member states from becoming dysfunctional and destabilising their neighbours. The problem is not the absence of rules. The problem is the absence of enforcement. Those protocols exist on paper, but too often they are ignored in practice. When governance standards are violated, when economies collapse, when democratic institutions are weakened, and when corruption flourishes, there is rarely any meaningful consequence from the region. As a result, the effects spill across borders and eventually become someone else’s problem. That is why the immigration debate cannot be separated from the governance debate. They are two sides of the same coin. If African leaders are serious about reducing migration pressures, they must first address the political and economic failures that are pushing people to leave their countries in the first place. We all know why that conversation is avoided. So, coming back to Trevor Noah’s analogy, it is ultimately a human analogy. It reflects a reality that has existed throughout history and even in nature itself. If lions have abundant access to zebras and other prey, there is very little competition between lions, leopards, and other predators. But when food becomes scarce, competition intensifies. The struggle is no longer about identity. It becomes a struggle over limited resources. The same principle applies in human societies. When jobs are plentiful, when healthcare functions, when housing is available, and when opportunities are expanding, people are generally more tolerant and welcoming. But the moment resources become scarce, tensions rise. People begin competing for the same opportunities, and that competition often manifests itself through politics, nationalism, tribalism, xenophobia, or other forms of social conflict. This is not unique to South Africa. It is not unique to Africa. It is part of the human condition. In many ways, what we are witnessing is both a human story and an animal kingdom story. The underlying dynamic is remarkably similar. Scarcity creates competition. Competition creates tension. Tension creates conflict. That is why discussions about immigration cannot be separated from discussions about governance, economic growth, service delivery, and opportunity. If we focus only on the symptoms while ignoring the underlying causes, we will never solve the problem. The real challenge is not merely getting people to live together. The real challenge is creating societies and economies that produce enough opportunity for people to live together peacefully.

Hopewell Chin’ono

91,304 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Trump is sending the National Guard to 19 different states as part of an effort to help “expedite immigration enforcement and stop crime”. 🚨🚨🚨⚠️⚠️⚠️ You would think that this kind of action would involve mostly blue states, considering that is where the most crime and illegal immigration is, in and around the more blue metropolitan areas. That begs the question…WHY would there be a necessary presence of the Military on U.S. soil in some of the most prominent RED states like Texas, Florida, Idaho, South Dakota etc.? On top of that, the White House just came out with a VERY ALARMING directive yesterday, saying that the “Secretary of Defense will ensure that the National Guard will be on the ready to be deployed and available to assist Federal, State, and local law enforcement in quelling civil disturbances and ensuring the public safety and order whenever the circumstances necessitate.” Make NO mistake…This is DIRECT language that implies, without holding back, that there IS an event, or multiple events coming that will trigger MARTIAL LAW in America. In other words, the Trump Administration IS very clearly preparing for a MASSIVE backlash and disturbances in some form, either organically, or manufactured (false flag), however that plays out is yet to be seen. It’s important to note and is extremely relevant that during the Hurricane Katrina rescue efforts which took place in 2005 under George W. Bush, the National Guard was sent in to assist with the recovery efforts and they also were directed to go home to home and CONFISCATE PEOPLE’S FIREARMS in the name of maintaining “public safety”. It is CRITICAL to understand what the GOAL has always been, and it has absolutely NOTHING to do with “safety” and EVERYTHING to do with establishing the New World Order technocratic police state on American soil. That is one of the primary goals of the World Economic Forum, United Nations, Bilderberg Group, Club of Rome, Council On Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission etc. These are the Globalist roundtable groups which REALLY control our Government behind the curtain by way of subversion and subterfuge. Those shadow government organizations are the ones who are RUNNING THE SHOW in America, and have been for many decades, all the politicians you see, and the Presidents are ALL puppet to these supergroups. All of these organizations agree on ONE thing…America MUST FALL to be completely under their control, and the thing that is keeping that from taking place is both our 1st and 2nd Amendment RIGHTS. They have been VERY successful in implementing the same gun grabbing TYRANNY in Europe, Australia and Canada, effectively neutering all of these countries, and making sure the people are unable to defend themselves from their rogue, controlled puppet governments when the crack down finally comes. You saw what happened those regions during COVID, that was only a TEST & precursor for what is to come. America…We have some MAJOR PROBLEMS & time is RUNNING OUT.

The Patriot Voice

42,815 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨 ARE POSSIBLE CHINESE RARE EARTH RESTRICTIONS PUSHING TRUMP INTO A WAR DEATH SPIRAL? In the past weeks, "Peace President" Trump has proposed attacking Christians in Venezuela, Nigeria & Mexico - he's already directly responsible for countless Christian deaths in Ukraine, Russia, Syria and Palestine. Thanks for the S/O Jimmy Dore - since I made that tweet you referenced below, I've done some investigation and while I still believe the rare earth minerals are speeding up the timeline, I believe there are several other factors causing Trump to specifically target Nigeria, which we will cover on The Homeless Left tomorrow - make sure you tune in! We need rare earths for electronics used in the war machine, and my source that China is asking American and European companies who aren't involved in our military industrial complex to circumvent our government and go straight to them is Alexander Mercouris of The Duran (see the thread below). Nigeria borders the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) states including Niger, Mali, & Burkina Faso (Chad is a close ally) - which focuses on mutual defense, self-sovereignty and economic independence, specifically to challenge Western influence. To accomplish this, the AES recently began defense cooperation, coordinating on geopolitical initiatives (including building relationships with Russia & China), nationalizing their resources, kicking out Western forces (Niger recently kicked the US military out its largest base on the continent), and planning to start a joint Pan-African currency and free trade union (see thread below). If America destabilizes Nigeria, it can easily strengthen the terrorist groups it's been funding (see the thread below), and cause a mass immigration crisis that will destabilize the entire region as people flee for safer countries across West Africa. Western corporations thrive off chaos in Africa, thus have funded it for centuries. For years, official NATO representatives have been calling for Nigeria to be split into several different countries because it's been aligning with China (see the thread below). Since those threats have been made, Nigeria has continually strengthened it's relationship with China and now serves as a main African hub for Chinese efforts in their Belt and Road Initiative (see thread below). Nigeria is on the path for energy independence with the largest oil refinery on the continent (which happens to be African owned) which produces more oil than Nigeria consumes, making it the lone African country with the ability to become a net oil exporter. The US Military wants to build their new military base right next to the previously mentioned oil refinery down south, instead of where the majority of where the fighting is happening in the North (see thread below). Nigeria is also the largest producer of fertilizer on the continent and is quickly reducing African reliance on outside countries - see the thread below where this was directly explained to Bill Gates earlier this year, as he is having trouble pushing his GMO crops and farming plans across the continent. Big Tech is also getting nervous about Nigeria - the recently launched African Continental Internet Exchange (CIX) allows Africa to build an internet infrastructure that could empower African tech firms and make it immune from Western big tech surveillance if it's fully taken advantage of, making Africa the only continent to take a step in that direction (see thread below). Nigeria is a main hub in that effort and is providing a lot of the infrastructure - if Nigeria goes down, that will severely stunt that effort. Not to mention, one of Trump's largest campaign donors - Erik Prince, has already begun building a private mercenary group to "protect Nigerian Christians" from the same terrorist forces that our intelligence agencies are funding and training (see thread below), so the military effort will directly handled by the same mercenaries who committed war crimes in Iraq that Julian Assange exposed. Openly racist Erik Prince also recently called for the total 'recolonization' of Africa as he positions himself to directly profit off that effort - the fact that he is allowed to set foot anywhere on the continent is a shame to African people everywhere (see thread below). This isn't about protecting Christians, it's about the same thing every war is about - resources and oppression. As of today, my X account has been restricted for no apparent reason, so if you can see this post I would really appreciate if you shared it.

Jay Scott

69,178 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

//The Wire//2300Z March 26, 2025// //ROUTINE// //BLUF: STRATEGIC AMERICAN BOMBERS STAGE AT DIEGO GARCIA. FALLOUT FROM GROUP CHAT SCANDAL CONTINUES.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- Indian Ocean: Aviation watchers have noted a significant buildup of military aircraft at Diego Garcia. Several B2 bombers have forward deployed to the infamous island, along with almost a dozen KC-135R Stratotankers and other transport aircraft. AC: This morning, a Notice-to-Airmen (NOTAM) was issued for Diego Garcia announcing ramp parking spot closures for the runway, indicating preparations to stage large numbers of military aircraft. This NOTAM is active until May 1, 2025. Lithuania: Four American service members were found deceased after a training accident this morning. Initial reporting indicates that an M88 recovery vehicle drove/overturned into a lake during a routine training exercise. The soldiers were assigned to 1st Brigade, 3ID. -HomeFront- Washington D.C. - Fallout from the Atlantic scandal continues in a variety of means. Various liberal politicians have called for various resignations due to this scandal, while conservatives have stated that no resignations will occur. As the initial release of screenshots did not achieve the desired effect, The Atlantic released more screenshots of group chat messages. AC: This morning, the activist group American Oversight filed a lawsuit against SECDEF Hegseth for the leak, and the judge assigned to this case has been announced as D.C. District Court Judge James Boasberg, the same judge who is currently at the center of hot controversy for out-of-jurisdiction rulings. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: The events at Diego Garcia are a major indication and warning of an impending large-scale military conflict. Since these aircraft were not entirely covert in their movements, various intelligence services around the world know that this logistical staging is underway. What it's for, is anyone's guess. This could be for an escalation of the conflict in Yemen, or it could be staging for a large scale war with Iran. The use of Diego Garcia as a staging zone implies that the traditional staging sites (Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, etc) probably do not want to be diplomatically involved in what is about to take place. The remote location of Diego Garcia (which is also not located in an Islamic nation) provides the added benefit of being out of range of most of Iran's weapons, and thus a vastly more secure site for the staging of strategic bombers. In short, if the United States were to seek a war with Iran, this is exactly the type of forward-deployment that would take place. Of course, despite the very clear and obvious military staging, a single phone call can result in all of these aircraft heading home without firing a shot. From the voyage of the Great White Fleet, to flying B-52's low and slow over various countries over the years, American history is full of examples of American power projection via the movement of very big weapons. However, using the information we have at the moment, the forward-deployment of national-level strategic assets indicates staging for a military campaign. Regarding the group chat scandal, now that we have a closer look at more screenshots provided by The Atlantic, a lot more information of questionable classification level has come to light. Even though the newly-posted screenshots are not the smoking-gun The Atlantic claims, if this information was not a deliberate plant, it would indeed have been a serious violation of Operational Security (OPSEC). Really the only communication that was a serious breach of OPSEC came from the SECDEF, who announced that the targeting missions against the Houthis in Yemen were a "GO", and detailed the number of strikes and estimated Time-on-Target. However, when determining the classification level of information, the source itself would dictate this. For instance, the SECDEF did not create this information himself, this was paraphrased from a slide deck or a briefing he was sent through proper channels. If an investigation were to be conducted, the classification of the information in that document would be the true source for whether or not Hegseth's comments were classified in any way. But therein lies the problem, he very likely paraphrased, and didn't copy directly from a classified intelligence product. It is this paraphrasing that gets into muddy waters really quickly, and highlights long-standing issues in government. When it comes to the higher levels of government organization, OPSEC is a nightmare under the best of conditions; regardless of party affiliation, anytime a politician gets their hands on any classified information one can rest assured that it will be held under the most lax security conditions possible. This does not excuse the behavior, but it does explain it. Similar story with the use of the Signal app in the first place; historically, this has very obviously not been an authorized form of communication. However it's been used for many years unofficially by staffers all over Washington (along with WhatsApp, before the security concerns prompted the general shift to Signal a few years ago). This morning DNI Tulsi Gabbard somewhat perplexingly confirmed that the Signal app is pre-installed on government-issued communications devices. If this is true, this would suggest a very new approach to the handling of official communications. Smartphones with access to classified information systems have existed for many years (such as the DMCC-S phones), but are highly compartmentalized and controlled, and do not usually have third party apps or app stores installed. However, if the DNI's testimony is to be believed, and the use of Signal itself was somehow authorized, the scandal then shifts to how an unauthorized person obtained access (since this clearly confirms that these communications were not compartmentalized in accordance with long-standing regulations). More generally, the use of Signal is mostly a byproduct of fast-paced comms being needed between high-ranking officials that are also convenient to use, even if they aren't as secure or official. This is also complicated by the fact that almost all politicians do not understand the concept of what's called Aggregation in the world of intelligence work. In short, a single detail can be unclassified...but if you get enough unclassified information together in the same report, this can add up to being a classified report. As Hegseth stated in response to the leak "No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods." were stated in the group chat. However, all of this data could have been easily discerned from other sources, in conjunction with what was provided. Notably, Mr. Hegseth left out the Time-on-Target information, which is almost certainly classified SECRET or higher, based on CENTCOM's own Classification Guide. If this group chat is indeed genuine, ignorance of the concept of Aggregation was probably the best explanation for what happened. Various officials "sanitizing" their remarks thinking that they are unclassified, but when put into the context of the larger conversation, their remarks should have been made by other means. This happens all the time, and is why the age-old spy tradecraft tactic of nationstates monitoring American Congressional hearings is still probably a wealth of information...all it takes is a Congressman getting a bit carried away and suddenly sensitive information is being alluded to, implied, or in some cases, stated openly. This has been the culture of Washington for a long time, but this is something that is really only accepted at the higher levels of organization. Once again, it doesn't make it right, but this is the reality of the way that classified information is handled by politicians; if any junior soldier had posted attack timeline details in a group chat, they would have been punished severely for this OPSEC breach, and their future career destroyed. If it were a low-ranking service member, the question of "is this classified?" would default to an answer of "yes, at bare minimum SECRET". When a politician is involved however, the answer defaults to a slap-on-the-wrist, at most. This is simply the reality of how things work. The official White House response has also shifted to denial, with the Press Secretary calling the event a "hoax". However, this statement is in opposition to the statements by other officials, such as the Vice President and SECDEF themselves. Both have not denied that the group chat was real, and both have spoken about the incident in terms of accepting that the chat is real, but also denying that anything damning was said (which is very obviously not true if a targeting timeline was posted). One possibility that must be considered is that these messages (or even the entire group chat itself) could have been run primarily by low-level staffers instead of the public figures themselves. In other words, it might not have actually been the SECDEF himself communicating the probably classified information, but a staffer instead. Historically speaking, it wouldn't be the first time that a staffer got their boss in trouble. However in this specific case, this is a hard argument to make. It's hard to believe that a low-level staffer would be posting targeting timetables in this manner. The sheepish responses by those implicated in the scandal also indicates that they were the ones behind the messages, especially since many words have been spoken on this scandal...none of which have been a flat-out denial of the identities of those involved. At this point, what the exact truth is will be impossible to verify with a high level of confidence. The whole affair could be fabricated from the ground up by the Atlantic, though this is unlikely based on the statements by those who were in the group chat. The group chat is almost certainly real, and the messages were probably sent by those as alleged. If the more controversial information was indeed taken from a classified briefing product, paraphrased, and posted in the group chat, this paraphrasing does not change the original classification of the intelligence product. The real question that remains is whether or not this was a deliberate deception attempt, or a deliberate leak of some kind. Whatever the truth is, it's unlikely to matter much in the long run, as this whole scandal has already turned into a political issue rather than the objective investigation and learning opportunity it should be. Also, the Secretary of Defense is an Original Classification Authority (OCA) per long standing mandate, so even if Hegseth (and others) did disclose classified information, he has the authority to retroactively declassify that information himself, at will. Analyst: S2A1 Research: //END REPORT//

S2 Underground

10,527 просмотров • 1 год назад

UNCENSORED TESTIMONY Pelosi and House Democrats Refused to Hear From Experts in 2022 about How the United Nations, Non-Profit Advocacy Groups and Criminal Human Smuggling Cartels COLLABORATED to OVERRUN U.S. BORDER In February 2022, the House Freedom Caucus held a panel to hear bombshell testimony about the growing mass migration crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border. Caucus chair Scott Perry explained that the House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, had refused to green-light an official hearing and had even refused to allow the caucus to use a Congressional hearing room to hold the panel. Todd Bensman, Senior National Security Fellow for the Center for Immigration Studies, detailed his investigation into the United Nations’ activities on the migration trail, and he shared evidence of how UN agencies appeared to be colluding with non-governmental organizations and human smuggling gangs. Bensman testified the UN was offering cash handouts, pre-paid debit cards, and even legal and psychological counseling to coach “migrants” in how to answer immigration authorities’ questions about persecution in their home countries. Part of the audio from Bensman’s testimony has been censored or corrupted, but I have reconstructed the missing segment [italicized] from his written notes. Bensman testified: “I have interviewed hundreds of the immigrants, most recently on an eight-day fact-finding journey to the Guatemala-Mexico border city of Tapachula. From my vantage point, I can confidently report that there is but one root cause that they — the immigrating foreign nationals — most often cite for coming now. “It is that President Joe Biden opened the American southern border wide to them. “They see, over their cell phone social media, many hundreds of thousands who have gone before secure quick releases and resettlement into America. “And they decide to also gamble huge smuggling fee investments that criminal smuggling gangs will get them in to stay, too. “With such an enticing, motivating return on smuggling investment, no thinking person should wonder why this global migration hit the all-time national record of nearly two million border patrol apprehensions in a single year. With probably 500,000 more gotaways, and that’s an undercount. “But the Caucus should also know that ‘non-profit advocacy groups — and more notably the United Nations — appear to be working side-by-side with the criminal smuggling organizations on the very same mission. “United Nations agencies such as the International [Organization for] Migration (IOM) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) are providing hard cash, food, shelter, legal services, psychological services — all along the migrant trails. “Which also materially facilitate journeys that everyone involved very well knows, despite any protestations to the contrary, always lead to an illegal American border-crossing. “In whatever small or large way, the United Nations and the non-profits it funnels money to can reasonably be said to contribute to the current mass migration crisis. “I found my first clue on a Rio Grande riverbank, on the Mexican side: A discarded UNHCR-stamped booket advising in great detail how migrants can and should travel north for the greatest chance of safety and success. Later, in Reynosa, Mexico, I witnessed the United Nations grantee, the IOM, hand out cash debit cards to migrants in long, snaking lines. The workers handing them out said they give $400 every 15 days to families of four, renewable every two weeks. “The UN tells me only the most vulnerable get this cash. But in Reynosa and again most recently in Tapachula, Mexico, where I saw the same long lines at the UNHCR office, nothing about them indicated acute vulnerability. They were regular family units of the sort crossing by the tens of thousands right now. Some showed me their debit cards there, too, and said were it not for this money they might have to leave the migrant trail and go home. “Further inquiry showed the cards are just part of a vast and sharply escalating UN program called ‘Cash-Based Interventions’ all along the migrant trail through Latin America. “According to the UN documents and migrants, these include the unrestricted, unconditionally useable plastic cash cards, and also cash-filled envelopes in some areas (never a good look — cash filled envelopes), money transfers for lodging, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and for something called ‘movement assistance’, which means transportation money to move forward when camps empty and reform further north. “Credible reporting shows that the UN is providing these forms of assistance all along the migrant trail, from South America to Texas. On a Cúcuta to Bogotá, Colombia segment, the UN was seen handing out food, clothing, and necessities worth an estimated $200 to $300 a day per migrant. “And then there’s important non-cash assistance keeping migrants on the U.S. trail. “In Tapachula, approval for Mexican asylum these days is important for permission to move legally beyond the southern provinces (where I was) — always to the U.S. border, of course. But many coming in from Guatemala innocently tell Mexican immigration they’re going for U.S. jobs — which is not an eligible asylum claim, so they get denied. “But I found a UN-funded solution recently. The manager of a UN-funded migrant advocacy center told me a full-time staff of certified psychologists helps these migrants recover ‘repressed memories’ of more eligible government persecution. This manager told me in a recorded conversation that his group also trains migrants on the front end of the process how to pass muster with Mexican asylum interviewers the first time around. “He said these operations produce a 90 percent success rate for thousands a year. Other UN-funded psychologists offer what sounds like similar work. If this is all true, the UNHCR in Mexico has found another way to keep thousands more on the trail over the American border. “Many can, and, will defend this UN assistance as lifesaving, but others who learn of it reasonably interpret it — [*SEE BELOW FOR CONTINUATION OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT] — in a very different way, and they want to know more, of course. “However Americans want to interpret this assistance to migrants they undoubtedly know they are joining an historic mass migration. All Americans deserve to know the full extent of it, because the United States is the UN’s largest donor and the U.S. Congress appropriates a huge amount of money to the UN every year. “I also would mention that the border is a national security concern. Just recently I was able to report that a Venezuelan crossed the Rio Grande from Matamoros to Brownsville, and that the FBI wanted that FBI-watchlisted individual held, and that ICE headquarters here in Washington, DC, intervened and demanded that, ordered that he be cut loose because he might get Covid in detention. That individual is now living freely, pursuing an asylum claim in Detroit. Thank you.” *[WHAT FOLLOWS IS THE WRITTEN STATEMENT PUBLISHED ON MR. BENSMAN’S WEBSITE ToddBensman dot com] “— as material support for mass illegal migration. “However Americans interpret UN assistance in the new context of a historic mass migration event, public debate in the American square is necessary because the United States is the UN’s largest donor. In 2019, the last year in which expenditures are fully known, the executive branch and Congress separately allocated $11 billion, $5.5 billion of which filled accounts that fund migration and refugee support activities, Congressional Research Services recently reported. “It’s unclear what the U.S. will contribute in 2022. The Biden administration proposes $3.7 billion, and it remains to be seen what Congress will want to appropriate separately.” For FY 2025 CONGRESS MUST CUT FUNDING TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF POPULATION, REFUGEES AND MIGRATION (PRM) which funds “migration and refugee assistance” programs including IOM and UNHCR.

Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD

127,805 просмотров • 1 год назад

A-B-C-D-E-F-G ... This famous sequence of letters known to much of the world dates back to 16th Century BC. A fairly small group of traders and merchants known as the Phoenicians created the foundation for the modern English alphabet and other alphabets. They organized a system of 22 consonants into what became the alphabet used not only by English speakers, but by speakers of many of the world's languages. The Phoenicians lived along the Mediterranean coast in what is now Lebanon. They inhabited a number of different city-states, the most famous of which were Tyre, Byblos, and Sidon. These Phoenician places were often in conflict with each other for domination of the region. Because of this lack of cooperation, the Phoenicians were conquered and forced to pay tribute to the virtually every empire in the region, including the Egyptians, Hittites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, and Greeks. When the Phoenicians created their new alphabet, they worked from symbols that were already in use among the Semitic-speaking peoples of Canaan and Mesopotamia. As early as 3000 BC, Sumerians and Egyptians had already invented writing systems based on symbols. These early scripts were primarily used by merchants and traders to record contracts, receipts, and lists of goods. The merchants and traders of Phoenicia wanted something that would not be too difficult to learn and would be quick and easy to use. Unfortunately, both the Egyptian and Sumerian writing systems did not meet these criteria very well. They used hundreds of different complex symbols to represent ideas (ideograms) and syllabic sounds (phonograms). The Phoenicians realized that most words were made up of only a small number of simple sounds. They found that these sounds could be represented in only 22 symbols and their various combinations. In their newly created alphabet, the Phoenicians used symbols or letters only for consonants, although their spoken language did contain vowel sounds. The modern Hebrew and Arabic alphabets, which were directly influenced by Phoenician one, still do not contain symbols for vowels. The Phoenicians spread their alphabet through their vast trading network that stretched throughout the entire Mediterranean region. The Greeks adopted it and by the 8th Century BC had added vowels. Later, the Romans also used a version of this same alphabet that is virtually identical to the one used today in the English-speaking world. As children, one of the first things we learn is the alphabet. This is an important thing to learn, since our entire written language is based around the combinations of letters in the alphabet. Every letter represents a sound in the spoken language, which lets us create words through combinations of sounds. This system is much more efficient than a written language in which each symbol represents an entire word, so it's pretty cool. But where did it come from? The alphabet, as we know it, developed over thousands of years, but originated from written language known as Phoenician. Phoenician alphabet was one of the first widely used alphabets in the world. Maybe our children should be singing catchy mnemonic tunes about this alphabet as well. To understand the Phoenician alphabet, we first need to understand the Phoenician people. For that, we have to travel back to roughly 1500 BC on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea around present day Lebanon, Syria and Israel. This territory was known to the Egyptians as Put, to people of eastern Mediterranean as Canaan, and to ancient Greeks as Phoenicia. The Phoenicians lived in trade-based city-states along the eastern Mediterranean, but also had colonies across the North African coast and some in Southern Europe. 🎥© thephoenicianlb #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

19,738 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

CIA RECRUIT IS PURSUING GLOBAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP AS "E-SAFETY" CZAR IN AUSTRALIA American–born Julie Inman Grant is a key architect of the multigovernmental “Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to censor the speech that politicians and government bureaucrats fear. X owner Elon Musk should be thrown in prison, said a senator in Australia yesterday, because he refuses to delete a video of a recent stabbing from X globally. “Whatever Elon Musk is on,” said Senator Jacqui Lambie, “it’s disgusting behavior. Quite frankly, the bloke should be jailed and the key thrown away.” But what’s truly disgusting behavior is calling for the incarceration of someone for refusing to censor the entire global Internet on behalf of a single nation. It is not the right of any nation to decide what should be on the Internet around the world. “No president, prime minister, or judge,” responded Musk on X, “has authority over all of Earth!” He’s right. It’s true that violent content online can be disturbing. I think platforms should put warning labels on them and find some way to prevent minors from seeing it. I also think there are real privacy concerns that should be addressed. But violence is not the only thing the Australian government has told X to remove. It has also targeted political speech. And nothing can justify the Australian government censoring the entire global Internet of content it does not like. Many of us, myself included, have long suspected that government censors in Ireland, Scotland, and the European Union would attempt to censor the whole of the Internet, not just in their own countries. With Brazil and now Australia demanding the power to censor the whole internet, it’s clear that our fears were more than justified. And now, Public has learned that there is a formal government censorship network called the “Global Online Safety Regulators Network,” which Australia’s top Internet censor, Julie Inman Grant, who is an American, described at World Economic Forum. The group includes censors from Australia, France, Ireland, South Africa, Korea, the UK, and Fiji. But before getting to that, it’s first important to understand just how powerful she is. Here is Julie Inman Grant, boasting of her extraordinary censorship powers. “Yes, we do regulate the platforms. We have a big stick that we can use when we want to….They’re going to be regulated in ways that they don't want to be regulated.” In a different video, Inman Grant said, “We also have some pretty significant ISP blocking powers. We just had some new powers given to us… in addition to be able to compel that takedown, to be able to fine perpetrators as a deterrent effect, and fine content hosts that don't take down this content, um, we can, um, We also have something in this new legislation called the basic online safety expectations.” She goes on to say that she is already working with Ireland, the UK, France, and other governments around the world. “We use the tools that we have, and we can be effective, but we know we're going to be, go much further, um, when we work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe…with the U. K. With Ireland and with Fiji in November 2022, we launched the global online safety regulators network that has now grown to seven independent regulators, including France, South Korea, South Africa and a number of countries are serving as observers.” At the World Economic Forum, Inman Grant said she had launched a global censorship body called “the Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to unify governments around censorship “So that we could have a form to help us coordinate, build capacity and do just that. But also make sure that what we're going to have differences in our regulatory schemes, there would be common values that drive us together.” This global censorship body gives governments extraordinary power to invade privacy, explained Inman-Grant. “What this legislation will give us is the ability to compel basic device information and account information. And more and more and more social media companies are starting to collect phone numbers and email addresses so that our investigators can at least find a place to issue a notice or a takedown notice or infringement notice of some sort.” Inman Grant may be working with other governments to create identity requirements and to stamp out Virtual Private Networks, which millions of people in China and other totalitarian societies use to access the free Internet. “You can use VPNs, you can use burner phones,” she said, “different SIM cards every day. So it's going to be a challenge for a long time because, again, the internet's global. If there is no such thing as a kind of global identity system or even a piece of identity everybody can agree with, you know, should we all be sharing our driver's license or our passports?” At that same World Economic Forum meeting, one of the European Union’s top censors, Věra Jourová, calls for censorship to avoid events like January 6, and to fight hate speech. “The same thing, uh, reaction on the 6th of January, 2020. So, in Europe, of course, we have our history. We had to take action against hate speech. Because what it is, anti-Semitism, racism, LGBT, the menu is always the same.” Jourva explains that the EU and Australia intend to pressure social media companies to implement global censorship to simplify things. Who is Jourova? Why she’s the same person that Public caught spreading disinformation about a new Russiagate hoax two weeks ago. Who is Inman Grant?...

Michael Shellenberger

648,166 просмотров • 2 лет назад

REVEALED: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran—but it had one fatal flaw. And that one little mistake has put the United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win—and is creating global panic over oil prices. . The top secret dossier, sold to the US by Mossad director David Barnea had a clear argument, that we can summarize as a four part narrative. One: A network of fake “Iranian NGOs” in the west would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, The story would be spread in order to manufacture consent for the west to launch a war against Iran. Two: The Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them, by having them focusing on peace plans. Three: During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty—including the peace negotiators. Four: Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, and the NED, would then take control of the country—and install US puppet Reza Pahlavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. . IT WORKED. AT FIRST And you know what? Every part of that plan worked perfectly. Except there was one key detail they had got wrong. And that brought the whole edifice crashing down. . ONE: DEMONIZING IRAN The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup at the start of January in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings and 750 banks. [SEE VIDEO] They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters– but they attacked not one synagogue. This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives, with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down. But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the west as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters - or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 - by “the regime”. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza. This part worked perfectly. Here’s Time magazine [video] reporting that 30,000 died. Most of the western media supported this. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to western political propaganda groups such as the NED, a CIA spin-off group. . TWO: FAKE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS Part Two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held "peace negotiations", but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. So the Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway. But the US and Israel decided to go ahead with Part Three anyway. (More 'fun'?) . THREE: KILLING GOVERNMENT LEADERS And you know what? That also worked perfectly, from beginning to end – in a surprise, unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader, but 40 members of the Iranian government. Now just imagine the outrage if any country took out the entire government of the UK or Germany or Canada or Australia. The world’s media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years. . FOUR: THE PUPPET The Mossad-CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was achieve part four: the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaidó figure—a man already selected and waiting in the wings. The western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness, and tried to pretend that this was “all” the Iranians. But this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified. . FATAL FLAW Now here’s where the fatal error showed up. Mossad’s plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year. Between June the 13th and the 24th of 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists, politicians and civilians, as well as members of the armed forces. That was also, clearly an illegal, unprovoked attack. No western leader cared—but the people of Iran, all the political parties, did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and the United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically. Mossad assumed that because their contacts, the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, still opposed the government, that many Iranians did. But that just was not true. The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government, and opposed to the US and Israel, than Mossad believed. . IRANIANS UNITED Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you – signalling that part four should go ahead: a takeover by people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But it didn’t happen. So part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians drew together and fought back. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump was horrified and furious – not with the Iranians but with Netanyahu and Barnea, the Mossad chief. And this explains why he kept making contradictory statements – he kept saying things that implied the war would be over very quickly, as the original plan said, while also acknowledging that the opposite was true. Remember how he used the phrase “short term excursion”. He also said the war would last four days only. And he also said the war was “already over”. And so on. So we can see that the plan, as sold to him, was a quick in-and-out operation, just as it had been in Venezuela – so that was what he had in his head. . IF YOU SHOOT THE KING… Netanyahu, deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiralled out of control, went into hiding—he was so deep undercover that rumours circulated that said he was dead. For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There’s an ancient saying that all plotters know. “If you are going to shoot at the king, you better kill the king.” What the US and Israel did was shoot the leadership of Iran. But they failed to kill the leadership of Iran. So now they are in trouble. And you know what? I don’t think there is any sympathy for them.

Nury Vittachi

366,599 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

//The Wire//2300Z July 6, 2026// //ROUTINE// //BLUF: CHINA AND NORTH KOREA CONDUCT MISSILE TESTS IN PACIFIC. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE CONDUCT MAJOR TARGETING EFFORTS. INDONESIAN MILITARY RECOVERS REMAINS OF AMERICAN PILOT KILLED IN AMBUSH OVER THE WEEKEND.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- Far East: Multiple missile tests were reported over the weekend, with both North Korea and China conducting tests of long-range munitions. North Korea tested a total of 12x cruise missiles from the KANG KON, the Choe Hyon-class Destroyer which is the newest addition to the Korean People's Navy. In China, a submarine-launched ballistic missile test was carried out at an undisclosed location in the Pacific, marking the first test of a SLBM by China in several years. Europe: The war in Ukraine escalated over the weekend as Russia renewed strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure. On Saturday, Ukrainian forces conducted more long-range drone attacks on Russian oil depots, most notably the Ust-Luga oil terminal in St. Petersburg. Separately, a different series of drone attacks struck various refineries in the Omsk region, deep within Russia. In response, Russia has conducted several strikes throughout Kiev, including the Vishnyovoye fuel depot on the southwestern outskirts of Kiev, which resulted in an extremely large fire. NASA's space-based fire detection sensors noted one very large fire at this fuel depot, along with a few smaller fires throughout the city that are anomalies from normal heat signatures in the region. In addition to the fuel depot, an ammo dump was co-located with this facility, which was used to store American tank rounds which contained depleted uranium penetrators, along with components for the production of cluster munitions which also contained depleted uranium. Analyst Comment: Depleted uranium tank rounds are about 40% less radioactive than raw uranium that is mined out of the ground, so the radiological nature of this ammunition is not normally a concern. However, this risk changes substantially if it's on fire as the smoke produced by burning uranium does indeed present a radiological hazard, thus the evacuations. This ammunition storage area was located in a densely populated residential area, with the resulting fires prompting the evacuation of roughly 600x residents. Indonesia: Over the weekend, Indonesian troops conducted an operation to recover the remains of an American civilian pilot who was killed by armed rebels in a remote town high in the mountains southeast of Wamena on the island of West Papua. Nicholas F. Goselin was a bush pilot flying supplies and materiel into Balinggama Airstrip when he was ambushed last Thursday. The attack was carried out by the West Papua Liberation Army (TPNPB), a separatist movement that has been seeking independence from Indonesia for a few decades. The rebels allowed Goselin to land, before murdering him on the airstrip and burning his aircraft. At the time of the ambush, a total of 7x passengers (local Indonesian villagers) were allegedly onboard the aircraft and their status is unknown. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: According to the armed rebels in Indonesia, the reason for the murder is due to Goselin allegedly shuttling Indonesian special forces into the region to fight the rebels. An American bush pilot landing at sketchy airstrips, alone, in the middle of a war-torn region high in the mountains is not a particularly safe career choice, and it's not clear as to what prompted the rebels to conduct this attack. The rebel group has claimed that they warned the aircraft not to land, but the airline that Goselin was flying for (PT AMA) made no mention of acknowledging any no-fly zones declared by armed groups. In any case, due to the death of an American, the Indonesian military is likely to crack down hard on this region over the next few weeks, in order to prevent rebel groups from capitalizing on their power-projection operations. Back in April, the United States signed a non-binding "defensive cooperation partnership" with Indonesia as Washington sought to increase relations by way of undermining Chinese expansion in the region. On April 13th of this year, one day before the defense pact was signed, Indonesian media reported that their nation was discussing (or had already agreed to) allowing American military access to their airspace. Analyst: S2A1 Research: Disclaimer: No LLMs were used in the writing of this report. //END REPORT//

S2 Underground

11,874 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Pierre Poilievre Declares War on Red Tape and Liberal Decay in Osoyoos There was a moment in Osoyoos, British Columbia, this week when you could feel the tectonic plates of Canadian politics shift. Pierre Poilievre didn’t just give a campaign speech—he delivered a declaration of war. Not against a rival party, not against a foreign power, but against the bloated, self-sustaining bureaucracy that has buried this country in red tape, crushed small business, and handed our economic sovereignty to Washington. And he did it with names, numbers, and fire. Standing beside Conservative candidates Helena Konanz and Dan Albas—real people with skin in the game—Poilievre laid out the most aggressive anti-regulation, pro-prosperity plan Canada has seen in a generation. This wasn’t “efficiency.” It wasn’t “modernization.” It was a full-scale rollback of the federal state. A 25% cut to red tape within two years. A “two-for-one” regulation kill rule: for every new rule, two must die. A dollar-value offset: $1 of new administrative cost must be matched by $2 in cuts. And for once, someone’s watching the swamp: the Auditor General will audit compliance. No tricks. No loopholes. No gluing rulebooks together to fake progress like the Liberals did. Real cuts, enforced in public, with consequences. Now compare that to what the Liberals have done. Under Justin Trudeau and now Mark Carney, the number of federal rules has exploded—149,000 and counting. That’s 20,000 more than a decade ago, with $51 billion in annual compliance costs for small businesses. It’s not just inefficiency. It’s economic sabotage. And who benefits from that sabotage? The United States. Poilievre didn’t dance around it—he hit it head-on. President Trump has said he prefers the Liberals in power. Why? Because they’re weak. Because they keep Canadian oil in the ground and Canadian dollars flowing south. “Trump supports the Liberals because he wants Canada to stay weak,” Poilievre said. “I want the opposite. I want to bring it home.” The press tried to corner him—tried to paint him as “too Trump-like.” The irony, of course, is that Trump has openly rejected him, because unlike Trudeau and Carney, Poilievre is not for sale. And then came the attacks on Aaron Gunn. The media paraded misinformation accusations that Gunn denied the impact of residential schools. Poilievre didn’t flinch. He called it out for what it was: misinformation. He defended his candidate. He stood for truth, not Twitter mobs. And he flipped the narrative: if you want prosperity and dignity for First Nations, give them control over resources, revenue, and jobs—not slogans. Then came the issue of interprovincial trade, where Poilievre again showed he’s living in the real world. Local wineries in the Okanagan are shipping their product to the U.S. because it’s easier than selling across provincial lines. Under the Liberals, it's harder to trade within Canada than with foreign nations. That’s not a federation—that’s a farce. Poilievre promised to tear down the internal barriers the Laurentian elite have protected for decades. The CBC? He torched it. Not with culture war talking points, but with precision. It’s become an overfunded, Toronto-centric mouthpiece for the Liberal Party, sucking up $1.5 billion a year to produce less local coverage than ever. Mark Carney just promised another $150 million with no plan to pay for it. Poilievre called it what it is: “a morbidly obese Liberal government—on steroids.” And he’s right. Carney hasn’t named a single Liberal expenditure he’d reverse. Not one. He’s offering the same broken promises, wrapped in fancier language, from the same corrupt team. Poilievre, on the other hand, laid out a detailed plan to: Eliminate the GST on new homes and Canadian-made cars. Cut income taxes by 15%. Abolish the capital gains tax on money reinvested in Canada. Fast-track LNG projects on the West Coast. Repeal every anti-energy, anti-growth law passed by Trudeau’s swamp. He didn’t ask for permission. He promised results. He’s not trying to manage the decline. He’s here to stop it. Final Thoughts I’ve been watching these press conferences like a normal person, which means with my jaw somewhere on the floor. On one side, you’ve got Pierre Poilievre, actually talking about numbers, policies, things that, you know—exist in the real world. On the other side? You’ve got Mark Carney, Trudeau’s old economic braintrust, grinning like a Bond villain, promising to “invest” another $150 million into the CBC—because apparently, $1.5 billion a year isn’t enough to produce wall-to-wall Liberal talking points and a half-hour panel on white fragility. Carney calls it “public broadcasting.” Let’s call it what it is: state propaganda—funded by you, weaponized against you. And this is the guy who’s being sold to Canadians as the adult in the room? The savior? Mark Carney—the guy who’s spent the last decade not in Canada, but lecturing Canadians from London, New York, and climate finance panels in Geneva? He’s not some neutral economist. He’s a gold-plated Davos swamp rat who literally helped engineer the economic disaster we’re now living through—and now he wants to be rewarded with the keys to the kingdom? This man flew in from Glasgow—no joke—where he was pushing his net-zero snake oil to a bunch of unelected bureaucrats who couldn’t find Fort McMurray on a map if their Tesla battery depended on it. And what’s he proposing now? Keep Bill C-69, the law that strangled Canadian energy, killed pipeline after pipeline, and handed America control over our oil wealth. Keep the law that says: If you want to build anything in this country, you better ask permission from 14 departments and Greta Thunberg’s cousin first. Oh, and while he’s at it, don’t expect a single dollar of waste to be cut. Not one. Carney hasn’t named a single Liberal program he’d reduce. Not the CBC. Not the bloated bureaucracy. Not even the social engineering schemes buried deep in your child’s classroom. So let’s spell it out: Mark Carney is Trudeau without the TikTok. Same worldview. Same smugness. Same ideology. Except now he’s dressed it up in Oxford accents and finance jargon and thinks you’re too dumb to notice. He talks about “fighting climate change,” but never mentions the carbon imports from China. He talks about “building the future,” while propping up the same agencies that couldn’t build a bus stop on time. He talks about “standing up to Trump,” while literally keeping in place the laws that give Trump control over our energy, our jobs, our investment. And we’re supposed to believe he’s the serious one? No. What he is—is the avatar of managed decline. The velvet glove of the same iron fist that’s been throttling Canadian prosperity for ten years. Poilievre sees it, and he’s naming it. That’s why the media hate him. That’s why the Liberals fear him. And that’s why Donald Trump doesn’t want him elected—because he won’t roll over like Carney will. So again—this is not a normal election. It’s not Liberal vs. Conservative. It’s not progressive vs. populist. It’s elite decay vs. national revival. Poilievre doesn’t want to “manage” this slow-motion collapse. He wants to rip the duct tape off the pipes, shut down the bureaucracy, and start building again. He didn’t ask for permission. He didn’t host a panel. He promised results. And when he says “Canada First,” it’s not some borrowed slogan. It’s a warning to the swamp: Your time is up. Carney is decline dressed as competence. Poilievre is the first sign of life this country has had in a decade. So yeah, Pierre Poilievre chose defiance. Now it’s your turn.

Dan Knight

47,387 просмотров • 1 год назад