Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 STADIUM HEAT – GROUPS A B C D COMPILATION 🔥 The first four groups delivered… and so did their supporters. No mercy, no personal space. Group A: Mexico, South Korea, South Africa, Czechia Group B: Switzerland, Canada, Bosnia, Qatar Group C: Scotland, Brazil, Morocco, Haiti Group D: United...

213,522 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨🚨 Zohran Mamdani’s calls for arrest of Netanyahu was thru collusion with foreign governments and terrorist orgs. Bernie and Jane Sanders, Progressive International, thru its created org called The Hague Group, is working with; terrorists, and foreign governments. Zoran Mamdani is in the DSA which is an official partner of Progressive International , correct? 😏 And so is just about everyone else in the communist left including the squad. But recall, these folks are directly in the communist country colluding, Progressive International: - Rho Khanna - Abdul el-sayed - AOC - Pramila jayapal - Bill Mckibbon - Jeremy Corbyn - Robert Reich The Hague Group was created by Sanders, Progressive International. Co-Chairs: Colombia (led by President Gustavo Petro) and South Africa (led by President Cyril Ramaphosa. Because international courts lack an independent police force, The Hague Group acts as an enforcement mechanism. Guided by the UN Charter, member states have pledged to implement collective actions: - Uphold the arrest warrants issued against Israeli officials by the International Criminal Court - Prevent provision or transfer of arms, munitions and related equipment to Israel, where there is a clear risk that they might be used to violate international law; - Prevent the docking of vessels at any of their ports where there is a risk of the vessel being used to carry military fuel and weaponry to Israel. Americans colluding with foreign governments have already prevented the docking of ships thru the Progressive International, “No Harbors for Genocide”, program. “International Activists Target Oil Tanker Supplying Military Fuel to Israel” “The effort to (successfully) block the ship from docking is part of the No Harbour for Genocide campaign, which was launched by a coalition of groups including Progressive International, Disrupt Power, the Palestinian Institute for Public Diplomacy, Valero out of Corpus, the Arab Group for the Protection of Nature, and the BDS National Committee.” 🔹The Hague Group’s terror links exposed On a webinar on 30 April, Executive Secretary (Hague Group) Varsha Gandikota-Nellutla said that The Hague Group, and its South Africa and Colombia co-chairs, are advised by “a variety of Palestinian organisations [sympathetic to Hamas]”, from “Al-Haq to Al-Shabaka, both based in Ramallah”, as reported by Jewish news site Gandikota-Nellutla went on to say that these groups have been present at “every single ministerial meeting”. She said the groups have not been “formally” included in The Hague Group “because that’s precisely what would scare away the Europeans ‒ to see this as a radical campaign group, not as a diplomatic bloc”. Gandikota-Nellutla’s comments were made during a webinar hosted by United Staff for Gaza, an organisation that consists of current and former United Nations (UN) staff members, who push for boycotts of Israel. She may have thought she was speaking confidentially. On the call, Andrew Gilmour, United Staff for Gaza Chair, told her “not to tell us anything that you would rather was not made public”.” 🔹Video by Progressive International and held at The Hague.

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

26,469 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

THE TIMING OF ALL OF THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR GLOBAL ENERGY SUPPLY IS PECULIAR. COULD THIS BE AN ORCHESTRATED, INTENTIONAL EVENT OR ARE ALL THESE EVENTS MERELY COINCIDENTAL? Consider the coincidences that we have seen in 2026: 🔥MORE THAN A DOZEN SIGNIFICANT REFINERY FIRES/INCIDENTS ON 4 DIFFERENT CONTINENTS W/IN 60 DAYS⚡️ 💥Ukraine blows up 1/4 of Russia's oil refinery capacity 💥Iran shoots itself in the proverbial head by closing the Strait of Hormuz 💥Iran orders The Houthis to close the Bab-el-Mandab Strait 💥IRGC blows up the Saudi's East/West pipeline & Red Sea oil terminal at Yanbu 🔥Global Refineries With Significant Fires/Shutdowns Unrelated to the Iran War or Russia/Ukrain War: 🇺🇸Chevron El Segundo (California) 🇪🇨Petroecuador Esmeraldas (Ecuador) 🇺🇸Petromax Channelview (Texas) 🇲🇽Pemex Olmeca (Mexico) 🇺🇸Shell Norco (Louisiana) 🇺🇸ExxonMobil Joliet (Illinois) 🚨Refineries in the Middle East Shut Down as a Result of the Iran War: 🇸🇦Saudi Arabia Ras Tanura (550,000 b/d) - largest domestic plant. Precautionary shutdown after a drone strike in the first days of the war (debris fire, no injuries). Later restarted; some units were still in turnaround. Jizan (400,000 b/d) -reported still offline in August after Houthi attacks in July and follow-on hits on related infrastructure. SATORP Jubail - a 200,000 b/d CDU and associated units under extended maintenance/repairs since April. SAMREF Yanbu (Aramco–Exxon) -drone impact reported early in the war. YASREF Yanbu (400,000 b/d) - fire claims in mid-September after East–West pipeline strikes; not confirmed by Riyadh as a full plant outage. The East–West pipeline hit in 9 locations & shutdown 🇰🇼Kuwait Mina Al-Ahmadi - drone damage, units shut, still reduced. Mina Abdullah - fire after a March attack; later described as under shutdown. Al-Zour (615,000 b/d) - not fully dark, but cut runs with the other two. Q3 Kuwait runs were seen near 570,000 b/d. 🇦🇪United Arab Emirates Ruwais (Adnoc; among the world’s largest single-site plants) - precautionary halt after a drone fire in Ruwais Industrial City. By August, Kpler said those earlier disruptions were largely resolved, with UAE runs around 700,000 b/d. 🇧🇭Bahrain Bapco Sitra (~400,000 b/d) - damaged in an attack and declared force majeure on affected operations. 🇮🇷Iran Lavan (LORC) and Bandar Abbas (PGSOC) on the oil-refining side, plus damaged South Pars gas refineries, Mahshahr / Bandar Imam petrochemical utilities, and Tehran liquid-fuel storage. 🇶🇦Qatar Ras Laffan - precautionary shutdown in 2Q 2026, later reduced throughput. Mesaieed - reduced since March; planned crude/condensate turnaround pushed to 2027. 🇮🇶Iraq Erbil (Kar Group) and Lanaz (Erbil area) - drone/fire shutdowns in Kurdistan. 🇮🇱Israel Haifa / Bazan (~197,000 b/d) - damaged and temporarily offline. Reports claim rebuild work could run toward 2028. 🚨Are we looking at a GLOBAL APOCALYPSE ON OIL REFINERIES & PIPELINES?🚨

Tomthunkit™

237,718 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

Kayaknya ini lagu Piala Dunia 2026 versi AI, nyebutin 48 negara dan nama pemain.. tapi kok enak juga yak 😅 liriknya kira-kira begini.. One game! One world! Let's go! USA, Pulisic on the run. Mexico, Jimenez, here we come. Canada, Davies wear the crown. Argentina, Messi don't back down. Brazil, Vinicius feel the heat. Colombia, James the golden beat. Ecuador, Caicedo drive it through. Paraguay, Almiron we see you. Uruguay, Valverde rise and shine. The Americas, we draw the line. Every star, every fall, every tear on this road, was building the fire, was carrying the load. Now the world holds its breath, we're ready to go. One fire burning in every soul. One game, one ball, one goal. From Mexico to Montreal, we bleed the same. We love the same, beautiful game. One fire, fire, fire. Every nation, every street. Feel your heart, feel the beat. One world, let's go. One fire, let's go. One world, let's spread. Mbappe light the way. Spain, Pedri born to play. Portugal, Ronaldo never done. England, Bellingham we just begun. Germany, Wirtz electric flow. Netherlands, Van Dijk still the show. Belgium, Lukaku hear him roar. Austria, Sabitzer give us more. Switzerland, Xhaka iron will. Turkey, Guler magic still. One fire burning in every soul. One game, one ball, one goal. From Mexico to Montreal, we bleed the same. We love the same, beautiful game. One fire, fire, fire. Every nation, every street. Feel your heart, feel the beat. One world, let's go. One fire, let's go. One world, let's spread. Croatia, Modric, 40 strong. Serbia, Vlahovic all along. Denmark, Eriksen, rise again. Scotland, McTominay, feel the rain. Bosnia, Dzeko, old gold heart. Czechia, Soucek, play your part. Europe speaks with 40 tongues, but one fire, fills all of our lungs. Japan, Minamino, Eastern fire. South Korea, Son, climbing higher. Iran, Taremi, never fold. Uzbekistan, Shomurodov, the bold. Jordan, Al-Naimat, make your mark. Australia, Leckie, light the dark. Qatar, Ali, 60 goals. Saudi Arabia, Al-Dawsari, lips of souls. Morocco, Brahim Diaz, pure glass. Algeria, Mahrez, built to last. Egypt, Salah, King of Kings. Ghana, party here in rings. Senegal, Mane, heart of gold. Tunisia, Hannibal, brave and bold. Cape Verde, Rodrigues, island pride. Dark Congo, Mbemba, stand beside. Mali, Bissouma, lead the way. Africa is here to stay. Panama, Carrasquilla. Honduras, Elis. Rising star, Haiki. Nazo, [samar gak kedengeran]. Curacao, Martina. New Zealand, Wood, across the sea. A rock who's same, proud and free. 48 nations, 48 fires, one ball, one pitch, one dream that never tires. One fire burning in every soul. One game, one ball, one goal. From Mexico to Montreal, we bleed the same. We love the same, beautiful game. One fire, fire, fire. Every nation, every street. Feel your heart, feel the beat. One world, let's go.

King Purwa

82,256 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Fadzayi Mahere🇿🇼 addressing the United Nations, May 17, 2023, for the 15th Annual The Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy: “Two years ago, I woke up in a maximum security prison in Zimbabwe with no toilet, no water, and no underwear. We ate watery porridge with our hands because we didn’t have spoons. Before lights off, we had to line up in queues for role call – groups A, B, C, and D. D for Dangerous. And even though the other women there had committed murder, armed robbery, and infanticide, I was the one put in the dangerous group. All because of a single tweet. So it might surprise you, that after repeated arrests and wrongful imprisonment, I have come here today, to the United Nations — optimistic. Because the crackdown now taking place in Zimbabwe is a sign – that we’re winning. Even within his own party, President Mnangagwa is weak. Their own intelligence says the opposition will win this summer. I am the National Spokesperson for the Citizens Coalition for Change, the country’s main opposition party. Because we dare to challenge the system, I have been arrested repeatedly. My car was smashed four times. I survived an armed robbery of my house. And then, in 2021, the local police slammed into a bus and killed a baby. I remember seeing the video of the mother, carrying this pale limp baby crying, grabbing the police officer by the collar. Crying, “He killed my baby!” I tweeted: This is rogue policing. Disproportionate use of force. It’s unconstitutional. No baby should die because of police brutality. I didn’t make this video go viral. By the time I tweeted about it, it was already viral. But they arrested me anyway, and that’s how I wound up in a maximum-security prison. I was charged with “Communicating falsehoods that are prejudicial to the statehood.” It showed me first-hand how the government will manipulate the law for their own gain. The judge and the prosecutors had no regard for my rights. They refused to admit the video of the mother and her dead baby, claiming I was a liar, and that the baby wasn’t dead. They didn’t let my lawyer ask all his questions or finish his statement. Today, I face a 20-year prison sentence because of my tweets. I’m free for now – though no Zimbabwean is truly free. My arrest sent a chilling message to the rest of society: “We’re watching you, even on twitter. And this is what you get: punishment for participating in opposition politics.” But I wouldn’t risk my life and freedom if I didn’t sincerely believe that change is possible. Courage doesn’t mean that you’re not afraid. It means that you act in spite of your fear. I choose courage. This summer, we’re going to paint the country yellow, and the Zanu-PF dictatorship will end. Hope and action are the sustenance of those who change the world. Thank you.”

UN Watch

68,006 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

🚨 BREAKING: Sec. Marco Rubio just walked right up to the mic at the Board of Peace and said it PERFECTLY on Trump circumventing the globalists! "We are here today because the President of the United States Donald J. Trump has both an ability and a willingness to use the power of his office to think OUTSIDE THE BOX." 🔥 "And that's why we're here. This was a very unique crisis in Gaza, one that the existing international institutions could not solve or figure out." "It needed a very specific type solution that required the partnership of all the nations that are here, including those that are here on an observer status." "This Gaza situation was impossible to solve under orthodoxy, under existing structures. And so what we did is they went to the UN and they got the UN's approval to put this group together and bring these nations together to come up with a very specific solution, solutions to very unique and specific problem. We have a long ways to go." "There's a lot of work that remains that will require the contribution of every nation state represented here today and we thank you for being a part of it." "And I hope this can serve as a model for other complex and difficult situations so they can be solved in the same way." "But right now the focus is on this one. We have to get this right. There is no plan B for Gaza. Plan B is going back to war." "No one here wants that. Plan A, the only path forward, is one that rebuilds Gaza in a way of enduring and sustainable peace where everyone can live their side by side with one another and never worry again about returning to conflict, to war, to human suffering, and to destruction." "Mr. President, thank you for having the vision and the courage to pursue something that has never been done before." "Every one of you is indispensable, including our observer partners, who we hope can find your way to join us at some point as officially part of this. But we are grateful for the fact you're here today and the contributions you've made already. Thank you." WELL-SAID, MARCO!

Eric Daugherty

676,297 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

And here it is — The Pizza Man. The Inflation Reduction Act: the largest money laundering operation in United States history — and in the history of the world. The Republican Oversight Investigation: CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, The BIDEN-HARRIS TERRORIST ORGANIZATION through the “Inflation Reduction Act” using American tax payers money to fund DOMESTIC TERRORISM on United States soil in the name of the greatest criminal conspiracy ever perpetrated on humanity, Climate Change, “In fact, there’s been a recent rush to get this money out. And that’s because they know there’s a likelihood that the administration will change to come November 2024. And thank God it did. And here is the follow the money, A: Climate Justice: $100 million to one terrorist organization to glorify another, Hamas, B: NDN Collective: $100 million to defund law enforcement and obliterate the United States military. C: NY Immigration Coalition/NJ Alliance for Immigrant Justice: $50 million for open borders and annihilate citizenship. D: Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs: $50 million to abolish police and abolish prisons. E: Ella Baker Center for Humam Rights: $1 to $3 million to defund the police, decriminalize shoplifting and abolish prisons. “I'm going to say that Vice President Harris…is quoted here, ‘I put equity at the center of our nation's largest investment in climate in history, to reach the organizations that know their community best.’ That's what she said when they rolled out and actually named these terror organizations.” In other words: Pizza Man is overseeing a $375 billion climate slush fund — billions of which are being laundered to foreign and domestic terror organizations disguised as charities, with no federal filings and zero public accountability. — Pizza Man extorted $20 billion for environmental groups — some of which were created just months before receiving the funds. — Pizza Man extorted $7 billion for a Maryland climate group that doesn’t even appear in the IRS database. — Pizza Man extorted $2 billion for Stacey Abrams, after her organization had only been able to raise a whopping one hundred dollars. 📝 This is the definition of RICO — racketeering. By the way: DHS Kristy Noem: The Maui fires under the Biden FEMA, 1 in 6 survivor’s had to Trade SEXUAL FAVORS for basic supplies to survive. Meanwhile, illegal aliens were staying in $300 per night luxury hotels, using FEMA dollars. Meanwhile, after Hurricane Helene, FEMA ran out of money because FEMA spent over $1 BILLION on illegals. Mayorkas “FEMA is out of money and can't make it through hurricane season.” “We do not have the funds" Additionally, after Hurricane Milton hit, houses with Trump signs were ignored.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

264,545 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇿🇦🇺🇸 BOZELL TEARS SOUTH AFRICA'S DEATH-CHANT LIE WIDE OPEN – "KILL THE BOER" IS HATE SPEECH, FULL STOP‼️ 13 March 2026 🔴 AMBASSADOR LEO BRENT BOZELL III THE DIPLOMAT WHO FORCED SOUTH AFRICA'S SHAME INTO GLOBAL VIEW South Africa is exposed. No more hiding. No more pretending. U.S. Ambassador Leo Brent Bozell III has ripped the mask off the ANC regime's grotesque double standards. On March 11 2026 at the BizNews conference in Hermanus Western Cape Bozell delivered the truth without apology. The chant "Kill the Boer Kill the Farmer" is hate speech. He declared it plainly: "I'm sorry. I don't care what your courts say. It's hate speech." Those words detonated because they named what the ANC has spent years burying. A political slogan that explicitly calls for the murder of whites is legally shielded as "historical expression" in South Africa while every other nation would prosecute it as incitement to violence. Bozell did not attack South Africa. He refused to participate in the delusion. The ANC's response was instant cowardly fury. They issued a demarche summoned the ambassador demanded he explain his "undiplomatic remarks". The same regime that tolerates Julius Malema leading crowds in death chants suddenly pretends to be offended by honesty. Their outrage is not diplomacy. It is panic at being seen for what they are. Bozell clarified on X and expressed regret over the sharp phrasing of "I don't care what your courts say" but maintained his personal view that the chant is hate speech shared by many South Africans while reaffirming that the United States respects South Africa's judicial independence. That diplomatic refinement does not dilute the initial strike. The truth landed. The pretense is shattered. 🔴 PAPENFUS DELIVERS A MERCILESS TAKEDOWN ON ENCA The fire spread the next day. In a scorching eNCA interview around March 12 2026 NEASA CEO Gerhard Papenfus obliterated the government's narrative. His argument was brutal and unanswerable. A public call to kill a racial or ethnic group is hate speech and criminal incitement everywhere else on earth. In the United States in Europe in any society with real rule of law you shout it and you are arrested charged and likely denied bail. Papenfus asked the killer question: "Ask anyone in the world is that hate speech?" He answered: "Only in South Africa does a judge rule that a call to kill a particular group is somehow not hate speech." He spoke from raw experience as the son of a farmer whose parents survived farm attacks. He quoted Malema's own repeated clarifications: the chant targets white people white farmers. The intent is not hidden. It is screamed at rallies. Papenfus dropped the bombshell. He was present when U.S. officials told South African representatives the chant must stop as a condition for improved relations. Bozell is not rogue. He is the messenger of official Washington policy. The interviewer pushed the Constitutional Court ruling and "historical context". Papenfus crushed it. Malema means killing whites. The ANC's demarche against Bozell is childish immature desperate. A regime cornered and flailing. 🔴 THE FIVE CLEAR U.S. DEMANDS PRETORIA IGNORES WITH CONTEMPT Bozell's intervention rests on five explicit U.S. demands delivered nearly a year ago and met with arrogant silence: Publicly condemn the "Kill the Boer" chant and all rhetoric that incites racial hatred or glorifies violence. Prioritise rural crime and farm murders to protect vulnerable farming communities. Reconsider the Expropriation Act enabling land seizures without compensation. Reform Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment policies imposing heavy compliance burdens on foreign investors and minorities while deterring capital. Adopt genuine non-alignment in foreign policy and distance from regimes like Iran. These are practical conditions for trust investment and basic decency. Pretoria's refusal to engage is deliberate defiance. Bozell warned patience is exhausted. Consequences are mounting. 🔴 SOUTH AFRICA THE GLOBAL OUTLIER THAT SHIELDS A RACIAL DEATH CHANT South Africa's judiciary has created a legal monstrosity. The 2022 Johannesburg Equality Court reversal the 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal framing the chant as symbolic struggle poetry the Constitutional Court's March 2025 refusal to hear AfriForum's appeal. All protect a chant calling for racial murder as political speech. This is indefensible worldwide. In the United States it fails Brandenburg v. Ohio incitement tests. In Europe it triggers hate speech prosecution. UN standards prohibit advocacy of racial hatred inciting violence. Public opinion rejects the farce. Polls show 53 percent of South Africans call it hate speech rising to 85 percent among whites. Even some EFF supporters admit it is irresponsible. Malema's own words confirm targeting whites. Yet the ANC shields the poison while punishing Bozell. EFF radicals called for his expulsion declaring him persona non grata branding his comments arrogant threats and interference in South Africa's affairs. The hypocrisy is nauseating. 🔴 THE SAVAGE BRUTALITY FARMERS FACE WHILE PRETORIA PLAYS DENIAL While courts debate metaphors farmers suffer horrors. Attacks feature extreme cruelty hacked with pangas tortured mercilessly mutilated murdered far beyond theft motives. SAPS claims low numbers such as 6 murders in farming communities in Q4 2024/2025 (January to March 2025) with victims including employees farm dwellers and farmers many non-white. AfriForum disputes under-reporting highlights gratuitous torture without economic motive challenges figures like presenting evidence of eight farm owner murders in a quarter where police reported only one. Recent Western Cape incidents prove the nightmare continues. Government insists "random crime" affecting all groups. Courts protect the chant cheering killers. Rhetoric normalises hatred. Brutality escalates. Whites endure targeted terror without equivalent calls from their side. 🔴 TRUMP'S RESPONSE A REFUGEE PROGRAM SIGNALING GLOBAL CONCERN President Trump has acted decisively. Executive Order 14204 signed February 7 2025 halts aid over race-based land policies discriminatory practices and egregious actions while prioritises Afrikaner resettlement through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for those fleeing unjust racial discrimination including racially discriminatory property confiscation. FY 2026 global refugee cap is a historic low of 7500 heavily allocated to South Africans with processing targets up to 4500 applications monthly at peaks though backlogs and pauses slow flow. Early groups included around 59 in May 2025 by early 2026 numbers build into the low thousands admitted or in process. This is not exaggeration. It is Washington acknowledging danger the ANC denies. 🔴 THE ANC A PATHETIC REGIME THAT ATTACKS TRUTH-TELLERS AND ENABLES POISON The ANC follows its tired playbook. Attack messengers summon Bozell lecture on etiquette accuse disrespect of courts and history. Pathetic. None erases the central obscenity. A chant demanding farmers be killed echoes at rallies while the ruling party refuses condemnation. EFF allies push exclusionary transformation BEE as investment barriers land grabs ignoring constitutional equality courts follow the party line. The FW de Klerk Foundation calls rulings shocking endorsements of incitement. Critics warn of a hatred tinderbox with unidirectional protection for majority speech over minorities. Inaction on brutality inflammatory language leaves vulnerable communities in perpetual fear. 🔴 THE ILLUSION HAS COLLAPSED SOUTH AFRICA IS FULLY EXPOSED Bozell did not invent the crisis. He exposed it. His words amplified by Papenfus's ruthless television demolition have stripped away every pretense. South Africa can no longer pretend death chants are poetry farm terror is mere crime racial policies are pure justice. History will record this moment not as American arrogance but as the day the ANC's rotten facade crumbled. One ambassador refused the lie. The world now sees South Africa clearly. Exposed. Indefensible. Impossible to unsee. 🔴 EDITORIAL DISCLAIMER AND STATEMENT OF OPINION This article is presented as political commentary, analysis, and opinion on matters of public interest. It reflects the author’s interpretation and critique of publicly reported events, political rhetoric, government policy, media interviews, and statements made by public figures in the context of ongoing political debate. All individuals, organisations, institutions, and political parties referenced in this article are public figures or entities involved in public governance, political discourse, or matters of public policy. References to such persons or entities relate solely to their public roles and actions that are already part of the public record or widely reported in the media. Any quotations attributed to individuals are drawn from publicly available sources, media reports, interviews, speeches, or widely circulated public statements and are reproduced in good faith for purposes of commentary and analysis. The views, characterisations, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this article represent the author’s personal opinions and analytical perspective regarding matters of public concern. They are not intended to be interpreted as definitive statements of fact, legal conclusions, or allegations of criminal conduct against any individual or institution unless explicitly supported by publicly documented evidence. Strong language, rhetorical expressions, and critical commentary are used as part of political opinion and public debate regarding governance, policy, and political conduct. Such language should be understood within the context of protected democratic discourse and not as literal factual claims. Nothing in this article is intended to advocate violence, discrimination, or hostility toward any individual, group, or community. The article critiques political rhetoric, policies, and governance decisions as part of a broader discussion about freedom of expression, democratic accountability, and public policy. Statistics, legal references, and policy descriptions mentioned in this article are based on publicly reported information available at the time of writing. Readers are encouraged to consult multiple sources, official records, and judicial decisions in forming their own views on the issues discussed. By reading or sharing this article, readers acknowledge that it forms part of an ongoing public debate concerning political leadership, public policy, and freedom of expression, and that the content should be understood as opinion and commentary within that context.

I ❤️ Cape Town ~ I Stand with Russia🇷🇺 MAGA

13,907 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

I agree with Trevor Noah’s analysis of the immigration debate in South Africa, and I also agree with Julius Malema’s noble desire for Africa to be one. From the outset, I must be clear that the biggest obstacle to African unity has been African leadership. Some of our countries have been independent for more than 60 years, yet we are still far from achieving the level of integration many Pan-Africanists envisioned. The failure to get there is fundamentally a leadership issue. I want to focus on what Julius Malema has said. He is one of the continent’s most outspoken Pan-Africanists, and his vision of a more united Africa is both admirable and inspiring. Unfortunately, because of the dysfunctionality of leadership across much of the continent, Pan-Africanism has, in some circles in South Africa, become a dirty word. That is a tragedy because the principle itself is not the problem. The problem is that many African leaders have failed to create the political, economic, and institutional conditions necessary to make that vision a reality. So let us look carefully at what Julius Malema is saying. I have great respect for Julius Malema when it comes to his Pan-African outlook, but I am afraid to say that the idea of an Africa with one passport, one currency, and a fully integrated political and economic system is unlikely to happen within our lifetime. It is good to dream and to idealise the kind of Africa we would like to see, but in its current political and economic format, the continent is nowhere near achieving that goal. I am 55 years old, so when I talk about a lifetime, I am talking about the next 25 years. If I live to 80, that would be wonderful, but I do not believe Africa will achieve that level of integration within that timeframe. The reason is quite simple. If you look at the European Union, countries do not simply join because they want to. They must first meet a long list of requirements and benchmarks. These include economic standards, institutional capacity, governance standards, judicial independence, and human rights protections. Even if we set aside the human rights question in Africa, because we know that remains a long journey, the economic question alone presents a major obstacle. A truly united continent can only emerge if its member states are led by competent, educated, and trustworthy leaders who build functioning economies capable of providing opportunities for their own citizens. The current xenophobic, Afrophobic, and anti-immigration discourse taking place in South Africa is often crude and sometimes ugly. However, stripped of the crudeness, there is an important point being raised that cannot simply be ignored. For Africans to unite successfully, they cannot first unite in one country. They must first unite across the continent by creating broadly comparable economic opportunities and living standards. For example, a Ghanaian should be able to travel to Zimbabwe visa-free. That is largely a political decision. But if that Ghanaian wants to relocate permanently to Zimbabwe, then the economies of Ghana and Zimbabwe should have a reasonable degree of parity. People should not be compelled to migrate primarily because one country is functioning while another is failing. The same applies across the continent. Someone should not feel forced to leave the Democratic Republic of Congo for South Africa purely because of economic collapse at home. If integration is driven solely by economics, then the countries that are relatively well managed will inevitably carry the burden of those that are not. This is an intellectual discussion that Africa cannot avoid. Resource competition is often what inflames tensions. If someone moves from a poor community in Mozambique to a poor community in South Africa, both groups are competing for the same clinics, schools, housing, jobs, and social services. That is where tensions arise. Interestingly, illegal immigrants from Europe are rarely part of the immigration debate in South Africa. Many people immediately attribute this to race, but there is another factor that deserves consideration. Wealthy immigrants generally live in affluent communities where there is little or no competition for scarce public resources. Take Chatunga Mugabe, for example. He lived in Hyde Park, drove expensive cars, and socialised in Sandton. Nobody was concerned about his immigration status. Likewise, where I live in South Africa, there are immigrants from the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, Kenya, and elsewhere. They are largely affluent people. The South Africans living there are often excited when newcomers arrive. When I moved from Zimbabwe and bought a house on my road, both black and white South Africans invited me into their homes for dinner and wine. There was no hostility because there was no competition for resources. That reality matters. If Africa is ever going to have one passport and one currency, we must first deal with the economic fundamentals. Most Africans do not realise that this is not primarily a political project. It is an economic one. Turkey, for example, has spent decades seeking membership of the European Union but has not been admitted because it has not met all the requirements. Countries such as Bulgaria and Romania had to meet strict standards before joining. Their judicial systems, governance structures, healthcare systems, and institutions had to reach certain benchmarks. The same logic applies to Africa. If every African citizen were suddenly free to seek healthcare anywhere on the continent, countries with stronger healthcare systems such as South Africa, Botswana, and Namibia would immediately face enormous pressure from people seeking treatment, including specialised care for conditions such as cancer. That is why this discussion is important. We must have it honestly and without slogans. We must discuss it not only in universities and intellectual circles but also in townships, villages, and communities across Africa. The dream of one Africa is a noble one. I support it. But before we get there, we must first address the economic, institutional, and governance realities that stand in the way. Until those challenges are resolved, the vision Julius Malema speaks about will remain an aspiration rather than a practical reality. The tragedy we face today is that we are focusing on the sideshows created by tribalists and rogue political actors who are taking advantage of a genuine problem that exists in South Africa and, indeed, in other parts of Africa as well. We amplify their voices and focus on what they are saying instead of focusing on the real issue. We should be asking ourselves a simple question. Julius Malema is right about the ideal he is advocating, but why are we not getting to where he wants us to get? Once we ask that question honestly, we are forced to examine the root causes. There can be no economic harmony, political harmony, or any other form of harmony between countries that are operating at vastly different levels of development and functionality. Take Zimbabwe and South Africa as an example. Zimbabwe has not had a working radiotherapy machine in its public healthcare system for more than four years. The country’s largest hospital has only one maternity theatre, built in 1977. Then look at South Africa. Its public healthcare system has some problems and could be much better, but by African standards it remains among the most advanced on the continent. If those two countries stand side by side, as they physically do, how do you integrate them when one is dysfunctional and the other remains a functioning state? These are the root causes we need to confront. This discussion must be held in a comprehensive and honest manner, not in fragments. We can speak about the noble aspirations of Pan-Africanism, and we can also discuss the obstacles that stand in its way. Both conversations must be held together. Only then can we identify what needs to be done and begin serious scenario planning around how to get there. Instead, we often get beautiful speeches delivered at the African Union, one of the most ineffective continental organisations in the world. People make grand declarations, earn generous salaries, and then nothing happens. Great speeches have been delivered since the days of the Organisation of African Unity. One of those speeches was even immortalised by Bob Marley in his song War. Yet more than 60 years later, many of the same challenges remain unresolved. That is an indictment not only of African leaders but also of African elites. Too many are content to make money while ignoring the underlying governance failures that hold the continent back. Consider Aliko Dangote, the richest black man in the world and Africa’s most successful entrepreneur. He requires 34 visas to enter dozens of African countries. Yet if I hold a British passport, my movement across much of Africa can often be easier than his. How can Africa speak seriously about integration when one of its own leading business figures faces such barriers within the continent? Until influential African business leaders such as Aliko Dangote, Strive Masiyiwa, Patrice Motsepe, and others begin speaking more forcefully about governance, corruption, economic mismanagement, and state dysfunction, progress will remain slow. As long as these issues are accommodated because money can still be made, Africa will continue to talk about unity without creating the conditions necessary to achieve it. So, back in the townships of South Africa, there is a crisis. I have always said that Zimbabwe is no longer a foreign policy issue. It is a domestic issue because the South African government must deal with its consequences in hospitals, social services, employment, housing, education, and many other facets of daily life. If the South African government does not have the courage to stand up to leaders such as Emmerson Mnangagwa and Mozambique’s President, Daniel Chapo, and say, “The way you are running your economies is creating problems for us,” then the situation will continue to deteriorate. The tragedy is that it is always the poor, the ordinary, and those living in abject poverty who end up fighting amongst themselves. Yet the root causes of these tensions are often created at the highest levels of political leadership. The people competing for jobs, housing, healthcare, and other scarce resources did not create the conditions that led to mass migration. Those conditions were created by policy failures, corruption, poor governance, and economic mismanagement. I would go even further and say that this is also an indictment of South African leadership. SADC already has protocols, principles, and governance frameworks that were specifically designed to prevent member states from becoming dysfunctional and destabilising their neighbours. The problem is not the absence of rules. The problem is the absence of enforcement. Those protocols exist on paper, but too often they are ignored in practice. When governance standards are violated, when economies collapse, when democratic institutions are weakened, and when corruption flourishes, there is rarely any meaningful consequence from the region. As a result, the effects spill across borders and eventually become someone else’s problem. That is why the immigration debate cannot be separated from the governance debate. They are two sides of the same coin. If African leaders are serious about reducing migration pressures, they must first address the political and economic failures that are pushing people to leave their countries in the first place. We all know why that conversation is avoided. So, coming back to Trevor Noah’s analogy, it is ultimately a human analogy. It reflects a reality that has existed throughout history and even in nature itself. If lions have abundant access to zebras and other prey, there is very little competition between lions, leopards, and other predators. But when food becomes scarce, competition intensifies. The struggle is no longer about identity. It becomes a struggle over limited resources. The same principle applies in human societies. When jobs are plentiful, when healthcare functions, when housing is available, and when opportunities are expanding, people are generally more tolerant and welcoming. But the moment resources become scarce, tensions rise. People begin competing for the same opportunities, and that competition often manifests itself through politics, nationalism, tribalism, xenophobia, or other forms of social conflict. This is not unique to South Africa. It is not unique to Africa. It is part of the human condition. In many ways, what we are witnessing is both a human story and an animal kingdom story. The underlying dynamic is remarkably similar. Scarcity creates competition. Competition creates tension. Tension creates conflict. That is why discussions about immigration cannot be separated from discussions about governance, economic growth, service delivery, and opportunity. If we focus only on the symptoms while ignoring the underlying causes, we will never solve the problem. The real challenge is not merely getting people to live together. The real challenge is creating societies and economies that produce enough opportunity for people to live together peacefully.

Hopewell Chin’ono

92,159 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Trump is sending the National Guard to 19 different states as part of an effort to help “expedite immigration enforcement and stop crime”. 🚨🚨🚨⚠️⚠️⚠️ You would think that this kind of action would involve mostly blue states, considering that is where the most crime and illegal immigration is, in and around the more blue metropolitan areas. That begs the question…WHY would there be a necessary presence of the Military on U.S. soil in some of the most prominent RED states like Texas, Florida, Idaho, South Dakota etc.? On top of that, the White House just came out with a VERY ALARMING directive yesterday, saying that the “Secretary of Defense will ensure that the National Guard will be on the ready to be deployed and available to assist Federal, State, and local law enforcement in quelling civil disturbances and ensuring the public safety and order whenever the circumstances necessitate.” Make NO mistake…This is DIRECT language that implies, without holding back, that there IS an event, or multiple events coming that will trigger MARTIAL LAW in America. In other words, the Trump Administration IS very clearly preparing for a MASSIVE backlash and disturbances in some form, either organically, or manufactured (false flag), however that plays out is yet to be seen. It’s important to note and is extremely relevant that during the Hurricane Katrina rescue efforts which took place in 2005 under George W. Bush, the National Guard was sent in to assist with the recovery efforts and they also were directed to go home to home and CONFISCATE PEOPLE’S FIREARMS in the name of maintaining “public safety”. It is CRITICAL to understand what the GOAL has always been, and it has absolutely NOTHING to do with “safety” and EVERYTHING to do with establishing the New World Order technocratic police state on American soil. That is one of the primary goals of the World Economic Forum, United Nations, Bilderberg Group, Club of Rome, Council On Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission etc. These are the Globalist roundtable groups which REALLY control our Government behind the curtain by way of subversion and subterfuge. Those shadow government organizations are the ones who are RUNNING THE SHOW in America, and have been for many decades, all the politicians you see, and the Presidents are ALL puppet to these supergroups. All of these organizations agree on ONE thing…America MUST FALL to be completely under their control, and the thing that is keeping that from taking place is both our 1st and 2nd Amendment RIGHTS. They have been VERY successful in implementing the same gun grabbing TYRANNY in Europe, Australia and Canada, effectively neutering all of these countries, and making sure the people are unable to defend themselves from their rogue, controlled puppet governments when the crack down finally comes. You saw what happened those regions during COVID, that was only a TEST & precursor for what is to come. America…We have some MAJOR PROBLEMS & time is RUNNING OUT.

The Patriot Voice

42,815 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

//The Wire//2300Z September 23, 2026// //ROUTINE// //BLUF: UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY CONTINUES IN NEW YORK. AMERICAN SANCTIONS ON IRANIAN AIRLINES COME INTO EFFECT. COMMERCIAL VESSEL STRUCK IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ. RUSSIAN HELICOPTER BRIEFLY CROSSES POLISH BORDER, ESCALATING GROWING CONCERNS OF AIRSPACE INCURSIONS.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- United Kingdom: Immigration issues continue to develop, as channel boat crossings have escalated over the past few days. At least two inflatable boats made landfall in Kent overnight, prompting concerns as to why they were not intercepted and turned around before reaching land. The recent migration surge has resulted in widespread protests at port facilities throughout the country, which have also become more tense as authorities provide security for migration operations. Middle East: This morning a commercial vessel was struck in the Strait of Hormuz, which resulted in a major fire. The crew of the M/V CAPE DAO abandoned ship, after one crew member was killed and another wounded during the strike. Poland: Overnight one border incursion was reported near Braniewo, as a Russian helicopter from Kaliningrad flew south over the border. The helicopter flew about 300 meters into Polish airspace before returning to Kaliningrad less than a minute later. Poland scrambled fighters to intercept the aircraft, and ground forces were placed on alert in the border region. Analyst Comment: This was probably a classic probing incident. Russia has very obviously been carrying out reconnaissance to probe air defenses and test NATO's response, and this case was probably intended to spin up Polish responses, which they dutifully did. Russia probably doesn't need to do this, but these types of light border incursions have been common over the past few decades. This incident is not exactly earth-shattering, but it's also not unremarkable either, and mostly serves as yet another example of how the Cold War era escalations remain constant. -HomeFront- Washington D.C. - As of this morning, American sanctions took effect to sanction nations which allow Iranian commercial aviation to operate within their country. These sanctions target nations that allow Iranian aircraft to land and refuel, with the United States threatening to cut off those nations from the US banking system. Analyst Comment: In response to the United States announcing a total ban on Iranian commercial air travel around the world, China has announced that they will continue to allow Iranian commercial aircraft to operate within their nation. This position was announced the same day that the White House welcomes President Xi for his first state visit in a decade. New York: The United Nations General Assembly continues as before. Various protest events took place outside the UN building throughout the day, including a few minor groups which blocked traffic for a short while. Analyst Comment: Otherwise, an alleged meeting also took place between American and Iranian diplomats on the sidelines of the Assembly, which does not appear to have resulted in any sort of positive movement toward a peace agreement. Both sides appear to be heavily entrenched in their positions, with no real room for actual negotiations at the moment. Illinois: The Joliet Refinery is returning to normal operations, after being offline for the past ten days due to flooding which caused a power outage. Fuel prices are expected to drop by a few cents throughout the Midwest as this refinery begins to come back online, with gas prices expected to return to the national average after being elevated due to this refinery being offline. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: Within northeastern Africa, trouble is brewing in Ethiopia. This beleaguered African nation has been host to civil unrest for many years, as tensions between government forces and rebels within the Tigray region have remained constant. Northern Ethiopia has become inflamed following years of dispute over the administration of the Tigray region. In 2022, a tenuous peace settled in throughout Ethiopia and Eritrea, after Ethiopia and the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) reached a sort of truce regarding the administration of the Tigray region. Last month, the peace deal started unravelling, and as of the past few days, the TPLF is mobilizing once again. This time, a coalition of various militia groups has formed, comprised of the TPLF, the Amhara Fano ​National Movement, and a handful of others operating under a common banner. As of this morning, TPLF militants have captured the airports in Mekelle, Axum, and Shire, which are comparatively important airports throughout the region. Based on statements by the group, the TPLF is once again trying to overthrow the Ethiopian government and re-take power (as the TPLF ruled the country from the early 90's up until 2018). While it looks like yet another typical African conflict between the standard warlord types, this conflict is escalating at the worst possible time, when there is already tension in the region as brought on by the Houthis just across the Red Sea. Perhaps most importantly, is the complex web of relationships and alliances. As is extremely common throughout the region, when there's trouble in one African nation, the culprit is usually next door. And in this case, Ethiopia has accused Eritrea of funding the TPLF and trying to overthrow Ethiopia (accusations which Eritrea denies). How this develops over the next few weeks will be important to watch, simply due to the tensions that are already complicating the region. Nobody needs another war adjacent to a major international waterway, and if this gets worse there's no telling how more destabilization will affect the region. If the TPLF can keep their grievances centered on the Ethiopian government, and if the conflict stays within Ethiopia (as it has so far) this won't be that impactful to the world economy. But if this conflict becomes more regional in a few weeks, this could get ugly. Now that the TPLF has a coalition of other groups, they cover a wider swath of public sentiment, and have the potential to turn up the heat, and if they so choose...allow the pot to boil over. Analyst: S2A1 Research: NomadNet: 5fa68c88be727a0e1a250a75e5e79269 Disclaimer: No LLMs were used in the writing of this report. //END REPORT//

S2 Underground

16,335 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

🚨 ARE POSSIBLE CHINESE RARE EARTH RESTRICTIONS PUSHING TRUMP INTO A WAR DEATH SPIRAL? In the past weeks, "Peace President" Trump has proposed attacking Christians in Venezuela, Nigeria & Mexico - he's already directly responsible for countless Christian deaths in Ukraine, Russia, Syria and Palestine. Thanks for the S/O Jimmy Dore - since I made that tweet you referenced below, I've done some investigation and while I still believe the rare earth minerals are speeding up the timeline, I believe there are several other factors causing Trump to specifically target Nigeria, which we will cover on The Homeless Left tomorrow - make sure you tune in! We need rare earths for electronics used in the war machine, and my source that China is asking American and European companies who aren't involved in our military industrial complex to circumvent our government and go straight to them is Alexander Mercouris of The Duran (see the thread below). Nigeria borders the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) states including Niger, Mali, & Burkina Faso (Chad is a close ally) - which focuses on mutual defense, self-sovereignty and economic independence, specifically to challenge Western influence. To accomplish this, the AES recently began defense cooperation, coordinating on geopolitical initiatives (including building relationships with Russia & China), nationalizing their resources, kicking out Western forces (Niger recently kicked the US military out its largest base on the continent), and planning to start a joint Pan-African currency and free trade union (see thread below). If America destabilizes Nigeria, it can easily strengthen the terrorist groups it's been funding (see the thread below), and cause a mass immigration crisis that will destabilize the entire region as people flee for safer countries across West Africa. Western corporations thrive off chaos in Africa, thus have funded it for centuries. For years, official NATO representatives have been calling for Nigeria to be split into several different countries because it's been aligning with China (see the thread below). Since those threats have been made, Nigeria has continually strengthened it's relationship with China and now serves as a main African hub for Chinese efforts in their Belt and Road Initiative (see thread below). Nigeria is on the path for energy independence with the largest oil refinery on the continent (which happens to be African owned) which produces more oil than Nigeria consumes, making it the lone African country with the ability to become a net oil exporter. The US Military wants to build their new military base right next to the previously mentioned oil refinery down south, instead of where the majority of where the fighting is happening in the North (see thread below). Nigeria is also the largest producer of fertilizer on the continent and is quickly reducing African reliance on outside countries - see the thread below where this was directly explained to Bill Gates earlier this year, as he is having trouble pushing his GMO crops and farming plans across the continent. Big Tech is also getting nervous about Nigeria - the recently launched African Continental Internet Exchange (CIX) allows Africa to build an internet infrastructure that could empower African tech firms and make it immune from Western big tech surveillance if it's fully taken advantage of, making Africa the only continent to take a step in that direction (see thread below). Nigeria is a main hub in that effort and is providing a lot of the infrastructure - if Nigeria goes down, that will severely stunt that effort. Not to mention, one of Trump's largest campaign donors - Erik Prince, has already begun building a private mercenary group to "protect Nigerian Christians" from the same terrorist forces that our intelligence agencies are funding and training (see thread below), so the military effort will directly handled by the same mercenaries who committed war crimes in Iraq that Julian Assange exposed. Openly racist Erik Prince also recently called for the total 'recolonization' of Africa as he positions himself to directly profit off that effort - the fact that he is allowed to set foot anywhere on the continent is a shame to African people everywhere (see thread below). This isn't about protecting Christians, it's about the same thing every war is about - resources and oppression. As of today, my X account has been restricted for no apparent reason, so if you can see this post I would really appreciate if you shared it.

Jay Scott

69,178 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

//The Wire//2300Z March 26, 2025// //ROUTINE// //BLUF: STRATEGIC AMERICAN BOMBERS STAGE AT DIEGO GARCIA. FALLOUT FROM GROUP CHAT SCANDAL CONTINUES.// -----BEGIN TEARLINE----- -International Events- Indian Ocean: Aviation watchers have noted a significant buildup of military aircraft at Diego Garcia. Several B2 bombers have forward deployed to the infamous island, along with almost a dozen KC-135R Stratotankers and other transport aircraft. AC: This morning, a Notice-to-Airmen (NOTAM) was issued for Diego Garcia announcing ramp parking spot closures for the runway, indicating preparations to stage large numbers of military aircraft. This NOTAM is active until May 1, 2025. Lithuania: Four American service members were found deceased after a training accident this morning. Initial reporting indicates that an M88 recovery vehicle drove/overturned into a lake during a routine training exercise. The soldiers were assigned to 1st Brigade, 3ID. -HomeFront- Washington D.C. - Fallout from the Atlantic scandal continues in a variety of means. Various liberal politicians have called for various resignations due to this scandal, while conservatives have stated that no resignations will occur. As the initial release of screenshots did not achieve the desired effect, The Atlantic released more screenshots of group chat messages. AC: This morning, the activist group American Oversight filed a lawsuit against SECDEF Hegseth for the leak, and the judge assigned to this case has been announced as D.C. District Court Judge James Boasberg, the same judge who is currently at the center of hot controversy for out-of-jurisdiction rulings. -----END TEARLINE----- Analyst Comments: The events at Diego Garcia are a major indication and warning of an impending large-scale military conflict. Since these aircraft were not entirely covert in their movements, various intelligence services around the world know that this logistical staging is underway. What it's for, is anyone's guess. This could be for an escalation of the conflict in Yemen, or it could be staging for a large scale war with Iran. The use of Diego Garcia as a staging zone implies that the traditional staging sites (Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, etc) probably do not want to be diplomatically involved in what is about to take place. The remote location of Diego Garcia (which is also not located in an Islamic nation) provides the added benefit of being out of range of most of Iran's weapons, and thus a vastly more secure site for the staging of strategic bombers. In short, if the United States were to seek a war with Iran, this is exactly the type of forward-deployment that would take place. Of course, despite the very clear and obvious military staging, a single phone call can result in all of these aircraft heading home without firing a shot. From the voyage of the Great White Fleet, to flying B-52's low and slow over various countries over the years, American history is full of examples of American power projection via the movement of very big weapons. However, using the information we have at the moment, the forward-deployment of national-level strategic assets indicates staging for a military campaign. Regarding the group chat scandal, now that we have a closer look at more screenshots provided by The Atlantic, a lot more information of questionable classification level has come to light. Even though the newly-posted screenshots are not the smoking-gun The Atlantic claims, if this information was not a deliberate plant, it would indeed have been a serious violation of Operational Security (OPSEC). Really the only communication that was a serious breach of OPSEC came from the SECDEF, who announced that the targeting missions against the Houthis in Yemen were a "GO", and detailed the number of strikes and estimated Time-on-Target. However, when determining the classification level of information, the source itself would dictate this. For instance, the SECDEF did not create this information himself, this was paraphrased from a slide deck or a briefing he was sent through proper channels. If an investigation were to be conducted, the classification of the information in that document would be the true source for whether or not Hegseth's comments were classified in any way. But therein lies the problem, he very likely paraphrased, and didn't copy directly from a classified intelligence product. It is this paraphrasing that gets into muddy waters really quickly, and highlights long-standing issues in government. When it comes to the higher levels of government organization, OPSEC is a nightmare under the best of conditions; regardless of party affiliation, anytime a politician gets their hands on any classified information one can rest assured that it will be held under the most lax security conditions possible. This does not excuse the behavior, but it does explain it. Similar story with the use of the Signal app in the first place; historically, this has very obviously not been an authorized form of communication. However it's been used for many years unofficially by staffers all over Washington (along with WhatsApp, before the security concerns prompted the general shift to Signal a few years ago). This morning DNI Tulsi Gabbard somewhat perplexingly confirmed that the Signal app is pre-installed on government-issued communications devices. If this is true, this would suggest a very new approach to the handling of official communications. Smartphones with access to classified information systems have existed for many years (such as the DMCC-S phones), but are highly compartmentalized and controlled, and do not usually have third party apps or app stores installed. However, if the DNI's testimony is to be believed, and the use of Signal itself was somehow authorized, the scandal then shifts to how an unauthorized person obtained access (since this clearly confirms that these communications were not compartmentalized in accordance with long-standing regulations). More generally, the use of Signal is mostly a byproduct of fast-paced comms being needed between high-ranking officials that are also convenient to use, even if they aren't as secure or official. This is also complicated by the fact that almost all politicians do not understand the concept of what's called Aggregation in the world of intelligence work. In short, a single detail can be unclassified...but if you get enough unclassified information together in the same report, this can add up to being a classified report. As Hegseth stated in response to the leak "No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods." were stated in the group chat. However, all of this data could have been easily discerned from other sources, in conjunction with what was provided. Notably, Mr. Hegseth left out the Time-on-Target information, which is almost certainly classified SECRET or higher, based on CENTCOM's own Classification Guide. If this group chat is indeed genuine, ignorance of the concept of Aggregation was probably the best explanation for what happened. Various officials "sanitizing" their remarks thinking that they are unclassified, but when put into the context of the larger conversation, their remarks should have been made by other means. This happens all the time, and is why the age-old spy tradecraft tactic of nationstates monitoring American Congressional hearings is still probably a wealth of information...all it takes is a Congressman getting a bit carried away and suddenly sensitive information is being alluded to, implied, or in some cases, stated openly. This has been the culture of Washington for a long time, but this is something that is really only accepted at the higher levels of organization. Once again, it doesn't make it right, but this is the reality of the way that classified information is handled by politicians; if any junior soldier had posted attack timeline details in a group chat, they would have been punished severely for this OPSEC breach, and their future career destroyed. If it were a low-ranking service member, the question of "is this classified?" would default to an answer of "yes, at bare minimum SECRET". When a politician is involved however, the answer defaults to a slap-on-the-wrist, at most. This is simply the reality of how things work. The official White House response has also shifted to denial, with the Press Secretary calling the event a "hoax". However, this statement is in opposition to the statements by other officials, such as the Vice President and SECDEF themselves. Both have not denied that the group chat was real, and both have spoken about the incident in terms of accepting that the chat is real, but also denying that anything damning was said (which is very obviously not true if a targeting timeline was posted). One possibility that must be considered is that these messages (or even the entire group chat itself) could have been run primarily by low-level staffers instead of the public figures themselves. In other words, it might not have actually been the SECDEF himself communicating the probably classified information, but a staffer instead. Historically speaking, it wouldn't be the first time that a staffer got their boss in trouble. However in this specific case, this is a hard argument to make. It's hard to believe that a low-level staffer would be posting targeting timetables in this manner. The sheepish responses by those implicated in the scandal also indicates that they were the ones behind the messages, especially since many words have been spoken on this scandal...none of which have been a flat-out denial of the identities of those involved. At this point, what the exact truth is will be impossible to verify with a high level of confidence. The whole affair could be fabricated from the ground up by the Atlantic, though this is unlikely based on the statements by those who were in the group chat. The group chat is almost certainly real, and the messages were probably sent by those as alleged. If the more controversial information was indeed taken from a classified briefing product, paraphrased, and posted in the group chat, this paraphrasing does not change the original classification of the intelligence product. The real question that remains is whether or not this was a deliberate deception attempt, or a deliberate leak of some kind. Whatever the truth is, it's unlikely to matter much in the long run, as this whole scandal has already turned into a political issue rather than the objective investigation and learning opportunity it should be. Also, the Secretary of Defense is an Original Classification Authority (OCA) per long standing mandate, so even if Hegseth (and others) did disclose classified information, he has the authority to retroactively declassify that information himself, at will. Analyst: S2A1 Research: //END REPORT//

S2 Underground

10,527 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

CIA RECRUIT IS PURSUING GLOBAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP AS "E-SAFETY" CZAR IN AUSTRALIA American–born Julie Inman Grant is a key architect of the multigovernmental “Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to censor the speech that politicians and government bureaucrats fear. X owner Elon Musk should be thrown in prison, said a senator in Australia yesterday, because he refuses to delete a video of a recent stabbing from X globally. “Whatever Elon Musk is on,” said Senator Jacqui Lambie, “it’s disgusting behavior. Quite frankly, the bloke should be jailed and the key thrown away.” But what’s truly disgusting behavior is calling for the incarceration of someone for refusing to censor the entire global Internet on behalf of a single nation. It is not the right of any nation to decide what should be on the Internet around the world. “No president, prime minister, or judge,” responded Musk on X, “has authority over all of Earth!” He’s right. It’s true that violent content online can be disturbing. I think platforms should put warning labels on them and find some way to prevent minors from seeing it. I also think there are real privacy concerns that should be addressed. But violence is not the only thing the Australian government has told X to remove. It has also targeted political speech. And nothing can justify the Australian government censoring the entire global Internet of content it does not like. Many of us, myself included, have long suspected that government censors in Ireland, Scotland, and the European Union would attempt to censor the whole of the Internet, not just in their own countries. With Brazil and now Australia demanding the power to censor the whole internet, it’s clear that our fears were more than justified. And now, Public has learned that there is a formal government censorship network called the “Global Online Safety Regulators Network,” which Australia’s top Internet censor, Julie Inman Grant, who is an American, described at World Economic Forum. The group includes censors from Australia, France, Ireland, South Africa, Korea, the UK, and Fiji. But before getting to that, it’s first important to understand just how powerful she is. Here is Julie Inman Grant, boasting of her extraordinary censorship powers. “Yes, we do regulate the platforms. We have a big stick that we can use when we want to….They’re going to be regulated in ways that they don't want to be regulated.” In a different video, Inman Grant said, “We also have some pretty significant ISP blocking powers. We just had some new powers given to us… in addition to be able to compel that takedown, to be able to fine perpetrators as a deterrent effect, and fine content hosts that don't take down this content, um, we can, um, We also have something in this new legislation called the basic online safety expectations.” She goes on to say that she is already working with Ireland, the UK, France, and other governments around the world. “We use the tools that we have, and we can be effective, but we know we're going to be, go much further, um, when we work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe…with the U. K. With Ireland and with Fiji in November 2022, we launched the global online safety regulators network that has now grown to seven independent regulators, including France, South Korea, South Africa and a number of countries are serving as observers.” At the World Economic Forum, Inman Grant said she had launched a global censorship body called “the Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to unify governments around censorship “So that we could have a form to help us coordinate, build capacity and do just that. But also make sure that what we're going to have differences in our regulatory schemes, there would be common values that drive us together.” This global censorship body gives governments extraordinary power to invade privacy, explained Inman-Grant. “What this legislation will give us is the ability to compel basic device information and account information. And more and more and more social media companies are starting to collect phone numbers and email addresses so that our investigators can at least find a place to issue a notice or a takedown notice or infringement notice of some sort.” Inman Grant may be working with other governments to create identity requirements and to stamp out Virtual Private Networks, which millions of people in China and other totalitarian societies use to access the free Internet. “You can use VPNs, you can use burner phones,” she said, “different SIM cards every day. So it's going to be a challenge for a long time because, again, the internet's global. If there is no such thing as a kind of global identity system or even a piece of identity everybody can agree with, you know, should we all be sharing our driver's license or our passports?” At that same World Economic Forum meeting, one of the European Union’s top censors, Věra Jourová, calls for censorship to avoid events like January 6, and to fight hate speech. “The same thing, uh, reaction on the 6th of January, 2020. So, in Europe, of course, we have our history. We had to take action against hate speech. Because what it is, anti-Semitism, racism, LGBT, the menu is always the same.” Jourva explains that the EU and Australia intend to pressure social media companies to implement global censorship to simplify things. Who is Jourova? Why she’s the same person that Public caught spreading disinformation about a new Russiagate hoax two weeks ago. Who is Inman Grant?...

Michael Shellenberger

648,166 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

REVEALED: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran—but it had one fatal flaw. And that one little mistake has put the United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win—and is creating global panic over oil prices. . The top secret dossier, sold to the US by Mossad director David Barnea had a clear argument, that we can summarize as a four part narrative. One: A network of fake “Iranian NGOs” in the west would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, The story would be spread in order to manufacture consent for the west to launch a war against Iran. Two: The Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them, by having them focusing on peace plans. Three: During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty—including the peace negotiators. Four: Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, and the NED, would then take control of the country—and install US puppet Reza Pahlavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. . IT WORKED. AT FIRST And you know what? Every part of that plan worked perfectly. Except there was one key detail they had got wrong. And that brought the whole edifice crashing down. . ONE: DEMONIZING IRAN The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup at the start of January in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings and 750 banks. [SEE VIDEO] They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters– but they attacked not one synagogue. This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives, with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down. But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the west as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters - or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 - by “the regime”. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza. This part worked perfectly. Here’s Time magazine [video] reporting that 30,000 died. Most of the western media supported this. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to western political propaganda groups such as the NED, a CIA spin-off group. . TWO: FAKE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS Part Two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held "peace negotiations", but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. So the Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway. But the US and Israel decided to go ahead with Part Three anyway. (More 'fun'?) . THREE: KILLING GOVERNMENT LEADERS And you know what? That also worked perfectly, from beginning to end – in a surprise, unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader, but 40 members of the Iranian government. Now just imagine the outrage if any country took out the entire government of the UK or Germany or Canada or Australia. The world’s media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years. . FOUR: THE PUPPET The Mossad-CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was achieve part four: the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaidó figure—a man already selected and waiting in the wings. The western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness, and tried to pretend that this was “all” the Iranians. But this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified. . FATAL FLAW Now here’s where the fatal error showed up. Mossad’s plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year. Between June the 13th and the 24th of 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists, politicians and civilians, as well as members of the armed forces. That was also, clearly an illegal, unprovoked attack. No western leader cared—but the people of Iran, all the political parties, did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and the United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically. Mossad assumed that because their contacts, the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, still opposed the government, that many Iranians did. But that just was not true. The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government, and opposed to the US and Israel, than Mossad believed. . IRANIANS UNITED Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you – signalling that part four should go ahead: a takeover by people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But it didn’t happen. So part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians drew together and fought back. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump was horrified and furious – not with the Iranians but with Netanyahu and Barnea, the Mossad chief. And this explains why he kept making contradictory statements – he kept saying things that implied the war would be over very quickly, as the original plan said, while also acknowledging that the opposite was true. Remember how he used the phrase “short term excursion”. He also said the war would last four days only. And he also said the war was “already over”. And so on. So we can see that the plan, as sold to him, was a quick in-and-out operation, just as it had been in Venezuela – so that was what he had in his head. . IF YOU SHOOT THE KING… Netanyahu, deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiralled out of control, went into hiding—he was so deep undercover that rumours circulated that said he was dead. For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There’s an ancient saying that all plotters know. “If you are going to shoot at the king, you better kill the king.” What the US and Israel did was shoot the leadership of Iran. But they failed to kill the leadership of Iran. So now they are in trouble. And you know what? I don’t think there is any sympathy for them.

Nury Vittachi

367,478 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce