Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

#Stalin wants Justice Swaminathan impeached,as he allegedly "changed core religious practice,by allowing #Deepam to be lit" Well,DMK is a serial liar In 2018,CJI Dipak Misra gave #Sabarimala verdict changing core religious practice..Did BJP/RWs want Justice Misra impeached? No

Sanju Verma

121,195 subscribers

12,687 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

#Stalin #Deepam #Sabarimala

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Have you ever seen any Christian or Islamic cleric praise a political figure to the skies, claiming that their religion can only be protected by that one leader? Yet this abominable practice has become an epidemic among many #Sanghified Hindu gurus and dharmacharyas. Selfish and utterly unmindful of Hindu religious interests, they repeatedly compromise the dharma just to flatter and ego-massage #PseudoHindutva RSS-BJP leaders, especially Narendra Modi, who is as an anti-Hindu wolf in cow clothing. गोमुख वृक । The greatest danger to Hindutva (Sanatana Dharma) today does not come from Christianity or Islam, but from this very subordination of Hindu religion and its core interests👇by compromised gurus and dharmacharyas to the narrow political agenda of RSS-BJP-Modi.

Have you ever seen any Christian or Islamic cleric praise a political figure to the skies, claiming that their religion can only be protected by that one leader? Yet this abominable practice has become an epidemic among many #Sanghified Hindu gurus and dharmacharyas. Selfish and utterly unmindful of Hindu religious interests, they repeatedly compromise the dharma just to flatter and ego-massage #PseudoHindutva RSS-BJP leaders, especially Narendra Modi, who is as an anti-Hindu wolf in cow clothing. गोमुख वृक । The greatest danger to Hindutva (Sanatana Dharma) today does not come from Christianity or Islam, but from this very subordination of Hindu religion and its core interests👇by compromised gurus and dharmacharyas to the narrow political agenda of RSS-BJP-Modi.

M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)

11,928 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Without Annamalai, the TN BJP IT wing seems to be in deep slumber! One of Annamalai's finest achievements as state president was taking on the DMK establishment head-on like no other BJP leader in history. 1. He directly challenged the Stalin family, questioning their monopoly over Tamil Nadu’s political and administrative power. 2. He exposed corruption scandals, naming DMK leaders involved in financial irregularities. 3. He openly mocked the Dravidian parties’ claims of social justice, arguing they served only a privileged political family, not the common Tamil citizen. 4. He countered DMK’s fake news against BJP and Modi with sharp press meets backed by facts and data. In short, Annamalai shook the very foundation of DMK’s dominance and the myth that only Dravidian parties can rule Tamil Nadu. In this old clip, you can see him openly challenging DMK and shifting the narrative. Imagine how he would have demolished the fake stories spread by DMK and its ecosystem about the Coimbatore–Madurai metro projects. Sadly, that fire has been missing ever since he stepped down, and the BJP IT wing remains in deep slumber. Annamalai is deeply and dearly missed! K.Annamalai

Without Annamalai, the TN BJP IT wing seems to be in deep slumber! One of Annamalai's finest achievements as state president was taking on the DMK establishment head-on like no other BJP leader in history. 1. He directly challenged the Stalin family, questioning their monopoly over Tamil Nadu’s political and administrative power. 2. He exposed corruption scandals, naming DMK leaders involved in financial irregularities. 3. He openly mocked the Dravidian parties’ claims of social justice, arguing they served only a privileged political family, not the common Tamil citizen. 4. He countered DMK’s fake news against BJP and Modi with sharp press meets backed by facts and data. In short, Annamalai shook the very foundation of DMK’s dominance and the myth that only Dravidian parties can rule Tamil Nadu. In this old clip, you can see him openly challenging DMK and shifting the narrative. Imagine how he would have demolished the fake stories spread by DMK and its ecosystem about the Coimbatore–Madurai metro projects. Sadly, that fire has been missing ever since he stepped down, and the BJP IT wing remains in deep slumber. Annamalai is deeply and dearly missed! K.Annamalai

Dr. Praveen

88,506 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

PETITION FOR FEDERAL INTERVENTION . Ilorin, Kwara State, has increasingly become a place of fear and exclusion for citizens who do not practice Islam. Over the past few years, several incidents point to a troubling pattern of religious intolerance and selective enforcement of the law. • Traditional festivals associated with Ìṣẹ̀ṣe worship, including those linked to Iya Olosun and Iya Oniyemoja, were reportedly stopped from taking place in Ilorin. • Tani Olohun was arrested for attempting to celebrate Ìṣẹ̀ṣe Day in Ilorin, an act protected under the Nigerian Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of religion. • On 24 September 2025, Iya Osunfunmilayo was attacked in her own home by individuals identified as clerics (alfa and sheik), who allegedly told her that Ilorin does not permit traditional worship and accepts only Islam. The matter was later suppressed through community pressure and manipulation, with no transparent justice served. • A widely circulated video shows religious clerics visiting an herbalist’s home to interrogate him about the presence of traditional shrines (ojúbọ Ṣàngó or Èṣù), reinforcing fears of religious profiling and intimidation. Most recently, a woman’s house was set ablaze following sustained threats linked to her traditional religious practice. Given the history of similar cases in Ilorin being handled without impartiality, there is a reasonable fear that justice will not be served if this matter remains under local jurisdiction. These events suggest a pattern where non-Muslim citizens particularly practitioners of indigenous Yoruba religion are denied equal protection under the law. This violates: • Section 38 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion) • Section 42 (Freedom from Discrimination) • Section 10 (The Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion.” We therefore formally request: • Immediate investigation by the Nigeria Police Force at the federal level. • Transfer of the arson and related cases out of Kwara State to Abuja, Lagos, or another neutral federal jurisdiction. • Protection for victims and witnesses facing threats or intimidation. • Independent review by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). This is not a call against Islam or any religion. It is a call for equal citizenship, justice, and constitutional order in Nigeria.

PETITION FOR FEDERAL INTERVENTION . Ilorin, Kwara State, has increasingly become a place of fear and exclusion for citizens who do not practice Islam. Over the past few years, several incidents point to a troubling pattern of religious intolerance and selective enforcement of the law. • Traditional festivals associated with Ìṣẹ̀ṣe worship, including those linked to Iya Olosun and Iya Oniyemoja, were reportedly stopped from taking place in Ilorin. • Tani Olohun was arrested for attempting to celebrate Ìṣẹ̀ṣe Day in Ilorin, an act protected under the Nigerian Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of religion. • On 24 September 2025, Iya Osunfunmilayo was attacked in her own home by individuals identified as clerics (alfa and sheik), who allegedly told her that Ilorin does not permit traditional worship and accepts only Islam. The matter was later suppressed through community pressure and manipulation, with no transparent justice served. • A widely circulated video shows religious clerics visiting an herbalist’s home to interrogate him about the presence of traditional shrines (ojúbọ Ṣàngó or Èṣù), reinforcing fears of religious profiling and intimidation. Most recently, a woman’s house was set ablaze following sustained threats linked to her traditional religious practice. Given the history of similar cases in Ilorin being handled without impartiality, there is a reasonable fear that justice will not be served if this matter remains under local jurisdiction. These events suggest a pattern where non-Muslim citizens particularly practitioners of indigenous Yoruba religion are denied equal protection under the law. This violates: • Section 38 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion) • Section 42 (Freedom from Discrimination) • Section 10 (The Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion.” We therefore formally request: • Immediate investigation by the Nigeria Police Force at the federal level. • Transfer of the arson and related cases out of Kwara State to Abuja, Lagos, or another neutral federal jurisdiction. • Protection for victims and witnesses facing threats or intimidation. • Independent review by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). This is not a call against Islam or any religion. It is a call for equal citizenship, justice, and constitutional order in Nigeria.

Bennylee

181,762 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi | On Supreme Court Judge Ujjal Bhuyan's reported remarks on interference of executive in the collegium system, Advocate Aman Lekhi says, "I tend to agree to the context in which Justice Bhuyan spoke. What is important to note in the case of Justice Sreedharan is three aspects: institutional integrity, perception (of independence), and the worth of law not only as a doctrine but also in practice. I feel that there has been a failure in all three counts. The executive has no role as far as the functioning of judges is concerned. The only involvement which justifies the executive's participation in the process is giving information about judges, which is otherwise not available to the court or the institution... When you are dealing with a sitting judge, no matter what your perception of the judge may be, that is part of the judicial realm. As long as there is no want of judicial integrity or honesty, or any breach of propriety by the judge concerned, it is beyond the executive to interfere... What has been released by the court suggests that Justice Sreedharan's transfer was shifted from Chhattisgarh to Allahabad due to the executive's interference. If something is prompted by the executive and a decision is subsequently re-engineered by the court, the entire process is compromised. That is not how it is supposed to work... Transparency has to fuel belief, not extinguish it, in the efficacy of the process..."

#WATCH | Delhi | On Supreme Court Judge Ujjal Bhuyan's reported remarks on interference of executive in the collegium system, Advocate Aman Lekhi says, "I tend to agree to the context in which Justice Bhuyan spoke. What is important to note in the case of Justice Sreedharan is three aspects: institutional integrity, perception (of independence), and the worth of law not only as a doctrine but also in practice. I feel that there has been a failure in all three counts. The executive has no role as far as the functioning of judges is concerned. The only involvement which justifies the executive's participation in the process is giving information about judges, which is otherwise not available to the court or the institution... When you are dealing with a sitting judge, no matter what your perception of the judge may be, that is part of the judicial realm. As long as there is no want of judicial integrity or honesty, or any breach of propriety by the judge concerned, it is beyond the executive to interfere... What has been released by the court suggests that Justice Sreedharan's transfer was shifted from Chhattisgarh to Allahabad due to the executive's interference. If something is prompted by the executive and a decision is subsequently re-engineered by the court, the entire process is compromised. That is not how it is supposed to work... Transparency has to fuel belief, not extinguish it, in the efficacy of the process..."

ANI

23,184 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

No religious organisation, political party, or powerful institution—regardless of its influence or following— has the right to dictate how the Republic administers justice. The rule of law belongs to the Filipino people, not to any organisation that believes its political weight entitles it to special treatment. By publicly rallying behind Senator Rodante Marcoleta while the Ombudsman and the Department of Justice move towards filing plunder and indirect bribery charges, the Iglesia ni Cristo has chosen institutional loyalty over accountability. Instead of affirming that the law should take its course, it has created the unmistakable impression that one of its own should be shielded from the full force of the justice system. This is not an isolated matter. Senator Marcoleta has repeatedly attracted controversy—from his conduct during the Senate’s flood control inquiry, where he was accused of diverting scrutiny from key personalities and relying on discredited testimony, to serious questions surrounding undeclared campaign funds and other matters now under official investigation and an impending indictment for plunder and bribery. These allegations deserve to be tested in court, free from political or religious pressure. That is why the INC’s intervention is so troubling. A religious institution that deploys its influence to defend a politician facing grave criminal allegations, rather than insisting that justice be allowed to run its course, abandons the moral ground from which it claims to speak. It ceases to be merely a religious body and becomes a political actor seeking to influence the administration of justice. Where was this moral outrage when thousands of Filipinos died during the previous administration’s bloody drug war? Where was the INC when the Vice President was accused, replete with evidences, of corruption in office and threatened the life of a sitting President and his family? Where was this uncompromising defence of righteousness when corruption, abuse of power, and the erosion of democratic institutions demanded moral courage? Silence then, followed by political mobilisation now, is not righteousness. It is selective morality. If the INC truly believes in justice, it should welcome an independent investigation, not to resist it. Senator Marcoleta deserves due process—not immunity. He deserves a fair trial— not institutional protection. No one is above the law. Not a senator. Not a religious organisation. Not anyone who believes influence is a substitute for accountability. The rule of law must prevail over political pressure, religious influence, and institutional loyalty—every single time. Should the INC be allowed to dictate upon the government under threat of weaponising its people if their capricious objectives are not met? The INC was gifted with free expression and was put under no obligations to pay taxes for the exercise of its purpose. But the same INC is now threatening to rupture the nation into another decade of chaos and destruction. Let the INC and its leaders be warned— you have the right to choose what you want to do, but you have no right to choose the consequences of those actions.

No religious organisation, political party, or powerful institution—regardless of its influence or following— has the right to dictate how the Republic administers justice. The rule of law belongs to the Filipino people, not to any organisation that believes its political weight entitles it to special treatment. By publicly rallying behind Senator Rodante Marcoleta while the Ombudsman and the Department of Justice move towards filing plunder and indirect bribery charges, the Iglesia ni Cristo has chosen institutional loyalty over accountability. Instead of affirming that the law should take its course, it has created the unmistakable impression that one of its own should be shielded from the full force of the justice system. This is not an isolated matter. Senator Marcoleta has repeatedly attracted controversy—from his conduct during the Senate’s flood control inquiry, where he was accused of diverting scrutiny from key personalities and relying on discredited testimony, to serious questions surrounding undeclared campaign funds and other matters now under official investigation and an impending indictment for plunder and bribery. These allegations deserve to be tested in court, free from political or religious pressure. That is why the INC’s intervention is so troubling. A religious institution that deploys its influence to defend a politician facing grave criminal allegations, rather than insisting that justice be allowed to run its course, abandons the moral ground from which it claims to speak. It ceases to be merely a religious body and becomes a political actor seeking to influence the administration of justice. Where was this moral outrage when thousands of Filipinos died during the previous administration’s bloody drug war? Where was the INC when the Vice President was accused, replete with evidences, of corruption in office and threatened the life of a sitting President and his family? Where was this uncompromising defence of righteousness when corruption, abuse of power, and the erosion of democratic institutions demanded moral courage? Silence then, followed by political mobilisation now, is not righteousness. It is selective morality. If the INC truly believes in justice, it should welcome an independent investigation, not to resist it. Senator Marcoleta deserves due process—not immunity. He deserves a fair trial— not institutional protection. No one is above the law. Not a senator. Not a religious organisation. Not anyone who believes influence is a substitute for accountability. The rule of law must prevail over political pressure, religious influence, and institutional loyalty—every single time. Should the INC be allowed to dictate upon the government under threat of weaponising its people if their capricious objectives are not met? The INC was gifted with free expression and was put under no obligations to pay taxes for the exercise of its purpose. But the same INC is now threatening to rupture the nation into another decade of chaos and destruction. Let the INC and its leaders be warned— you have the right to choose what you want to do, but you have no right to choose the consequences of those actions.

The King

10,699 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Name of the Book: Why do we need MKS as PM of India? Chapter: 1 Page: 4 In 1982, when the youth wing was formed there was a proposal that Stalin should be appointed as coordinator, but Karunanidhi was the first person to reject the idea and walk out of the meeting saying “There are already two members from my family in the party; my son in law Murasoli Maran and I. I believe that is the limit and I don't want one more member from my family " The youth wing cadres and senior party members present in the meeting were in utter shock. Stalin was their nearperfect choice to lead the newly formed youth wing of DMK but Karunanidhi was very firm about not including another family member into the official ranks of the party. The meeting was inconclusive and no one was able to convince Karunanidhi about Stalin being a good choice to lead the youth DMK wing. A senior cadre K. Subbu stood up and put forward his opinion which was the opinion of almost all the youth wing cadres. He said “We are not asking Stalin to lead the youth DMK because he is Kalaignar's son. If we wanted Kalaignar's son to be the youth wing coordinator we would have asked for Muthu, Alagri, or Tamil Arasu but the majority of us want Stalin to be the coordinator. When the emergency was declared in 1976, Stalin was arrested and taken away from his home by the police. Karunanidhi should have stopped them and declared that Stalin was not an official member of the party but he did not do so. Eventually, Stalin had undergone numerous hardships during imprisonment for the sake of the party and that demonstrates his devotion to the party. Kalaignar did not stop Stalin from being arrested that day hence he should not stop him from being the coordinator of the youth DMK today.” After this representation and the unwavering support from the members of the party, Karunanidhi couldn’t interfere with the democratic decision of the party cadres. It was the first official position given to Stalin in the DMK party. Created by Kathir RS

Name of the Book: Why do we need MKS as PM of India? Chapter: 1 Page: 4 In 1982, when the youth wing was formed there was a proposal that Stalin should be appointed as coordinator, but Karunanidhi was the first person to reject the idea and walk out of the meeting saying “There are already two members from my family in the party; my son in law Murasoli Maran and I. I believe that is the limit and I don't want one more member from my family " The youth wing cadres and senior party members present in the meeting were in utter shock. Stalin was their nearperfect choice to lead the newly formed youth wing of DMK but Karunanidhi was very firm about not including another family member into the official ranks of the party. The meeting was inconclusive and no one was able to convince Karunanidhi about Stalin being a good choice to lead the youth DMK wing. A senior cadre K. Subbu stood up and put forward his opinion which was the opinion of almost all the youth wing cadres. He said “We are not asking Stalin to lead the youth DMK because he is Kalaignar's son. If we wanted Kalaignar's son to be the youth wing coordinator we would have asked for Muthu, Alagri, or Tamil Arasu but the majority of us want Stalin to be the coordinator. When the emergency was declared in 1976, Stalin was arrested and taken away from his home by the police. Karunanidhi should have stopped them and declared that Stalin was not an official member of the party but he did not do so. Eventually, Stalin had undergone numerous hardships during imprisonment for the sake of the party and that demonstrates his devotion to the party. Kalaignar did not stop Stalin from being arrested that day hence he should not stop him from being the coordinator of the youth DMK today.” After this representation and the unwavering support from the members of the party, Karunanidhi couldn’t interfere with the democratic decision of the party cadres. It was the first official position given to Stalin in the DMK party. Created by Kathir RS

We Dravidians

10,784 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

#WATCH #SHAMEFUL: " We will pull the beards of clerics like Maulana Sajjad Nomani and put them in JAIL after 23rd NOVEMBER " This threat by BJP MLA Nitesh Rane is utterly Criminal, shameful and an insult to an elderly religious & spiritual leader of the Muslim community. The Maulana nomani only used his democratic rights and guided his community to vote for Secular alliance of MVA and he is being threatened with this, In another video Rane said : " Maulana Sajjad Nomani is white color TERRORIST, The way we finished Kasab, the same rule should be applied against Nomani as well " this is absolutely unacceptable & Radicalism, Maharashtra has a culture of respecting religious leaders of every community, but it seems that BJP now wants to destroy this culture and maintain an atmosphere of hatred and riots in this state. We will not remain silent on such low level THREATS & insults made on our senior Islamic scholar & spiritual leader Sajjad Nomani, we demand to #ArrestNiteshRane

#WATCH #SHAMEFUL: " We will pull the beards of clerics like Maulana Sajjad Nomani and put them in JAIL after 23rd NOVEMBER " This threat by BJP MLA Nitesh Rane is utterly Criminal, shameful and an insult to an elderly religious & spiritual leader of the Muslim community. The Maulana nomani only used his democratic rights and guided his community to vote for Secular alliance of MVA and he is being threatened with this, In another video Rane said : " Maulana Sajjad Nomani is white color TERRORIST, The way we finished Kasab, the same rule should be applied against Nomani as well " this is absolutely unacceptable & Radicalism, Maharashtra has a culture of respecting religious leaders of every community, but it seems that BJP now wants to destroy this culture and maintain an atmosphere of hatred and riots in this state. We will not remain silent on such low level THREATS & insults made on our senior Islamic scholar & spiritual leader Sajjad Nomani, we demand to #ArrestNiteshRane

Samiullah Khan

49,981 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

1.From the very beginning, Khomeini stated that thousands of those who opposed his ideology should be imprisoned and eliminated — and this was later carried out in practice. 2.He said that instead of having bars and clubs, where people sing and dance, society should be turned toward battlefields and conflict. 3.He openly expressed that he had no interest in peace or negotiations, and portrayed war as something beneficial, claiming that conflict keeps people active and prevents them from becoming “lazy.” 4.He stated that a woman’s worth is not in showing her hair or wearing makeup, and that covering her hair is mandatory. Under this ideology, women who did not wear the hijab were threatened with slogans such as “death to those without hijab.” 5.They showed no respect for followers of other religions and failed to uphold religious freedom. 6.They promoted hostility toward Americans and Israelis, including acts such as taking American hostages and causing harm.

1.From the very beginning, Khomeini stated that thousands of those who opposed his ideology should be imprisoned and eliminated — and this was later carried out in practice. 2.He said that instead of having bars and clubs, where people sing and dance, society should be turned toward battlefields and conflict. 3.He openly expressed that he had no interest in peace or negotiations, and portrayed war as something beneficial, claiming that conflict keeps people active and prevents them from becoming “lazy.” 4.He stated that a woman’s worth is not in showing her hair or wearing makeup, and that covering her hair is mandatory. Under this ideology, women who did not wear the hijab were threatened with slogans such as “death to those without hijab.” 5.They showed no respect for followers of other religions and failed to uphold religious freedom. 6.They promoted hostility toward Americans and Israelis, including acts such as taking American hostages and causing harm.

A🤍

31,857 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Nnamdi Kanu is trending because his trial has been adjourned indefinitely. Barely 48hrs after he said no one should beg Tinubu, on his behalf. Because agitating Biafra is not a crime. He rejected the adjournment by Justice Binta Nyako. Lectured the court, alleged Nyako wants to exchange his head. September 24th, 2024, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu rejected and openly accused Justice Binta Nyako of being an unprofessional, bias Justice who actively disobeys the rule of law. Then asked her to remove herself from his trial. She admitted and transferred his case file to Justice Tosho. Justice Tosho rejected it and sent it back to Justice Nyako. MNK insisted he isn’t confident in Justice Nyako handling his case. That, if there is no one willing to handle his case in Abuja. Then, his trial should be moved to the South East. Since his alleged offense of “Treason” affects the South East, not the North. Then, they should be well equipped to handle the trial accordingly. Today in court, Justice Nyako appeared again and was ready to proceed with the case at the Federal High Court Abuja. As prosecution was looking to begin, MNK’s lawyer opposed, saying they are not here for trial. Justice Nyako then said, she initially recused herself from the case, but she was assigned back by the Chief Judge. That, they’d need to file a reassignment motion. As Kanu’s lawyers and the prosecution were arguing the need for such. Nnamdi Kanu demanded to speak. He said, he’s only in court out of respect. That, Nyako no longer has jurisdiction over his case. And he doesn’t understand why they always turn the law upside down when it comes to his case. He argued that, since Nyako had officially recused herself from his case. Then, the Chief Judge can’t impose, instead appeal. Kanu insisted Nyako is unprofessional and bias. Kanu said “If the Chief Judge disagrees, he should appeal the decision. You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever. You stand recused and you must leave my case. I don’t need you in my case. You are biased. Tell the Chief Judge that Nnamdi Kanu said so. This is not a court of law. This is a shrine to injustice and i will not subject myself to it”. After his submission, the prosecutor still wanted the court to go ahead with trial. MNK interrupted saying “Because of money they are paying you from the AGF’s office, a grown-up man like you is here supporting evil. The rule of law says you should go on appeal. The same Chief Judge, writing this stupid memo, I have recused him before. He sat on appeal, I took him to NJC and recused him. Why is he insisting on this one? He wants to embarrass your lordship by asking her to sit on this case.” Then Justice Nyako, decided Adjourn the case indefinitely due to the situation of things. Kanu again; “You have no jurisdiction to adjourn anything. None whatsoever. You cannot make an order without jurisdiction. The memo from the Chief Judge cannot confer jurisdiction upon you” Kanu insists they deliberately ignore the law due to their bias against him. That him agitating for Biafra is his right, that somehow they’ve changed his charge from treason to terrorism. He remains defiant, against Justice Nyako handling his trial. He alleged that Justice Nyako has reached some sort of agreement to give his head in exchange for the freedom of her husband and son, who are facing a criminal case. Hinting that Nyako never truely left the case. Basically, he just wants the court to obey the Nigerian constitution. He has been in detention since 2021. But Nigerians fear it has become political and he may need to be submissive, otherwise his pride will keep him incarcerated indefinitely. • Pay for what you use. Get detailed analytics on your energy consumption • water, electricity & gas. Inquire now: Vendr Utilities || iOS • Web • Android || info@vendr.ng ||

Nnamdi Kanu is trending because his trial has been adjourned indefinitely. Barely 48hrs after he said no one should beg Tinubu, on his behalf. Because agitating Biafra is not a crime. He rejected the adjournment by Justice Binta Nyako. Lectured the court, alleged Nyako wants to exchange his head. September 24th, 2024, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu rejected and openly accused Justice Binta Nyako of being an unprofessional, bias Justice who actively disobeys the rule of law. Then asked her to remove herself from his trial. She admitted and transferred his case file to Justice Tosho. Justice Tosho rejected it and sent it back to Justice Nyako. MNK insisted he isn’t confident in Justice Nyako handling his case. That, if there is no one willing to handle his case in Abuja. Then, his trial should be moved to the South East. Since his alleged offense of “Treason” affects the South East, not the North. Then, they should be well equipped to handle the trial accordingly. Today in court, Justice Nyako appeared again and was ready to proceed with the case at the Federal High Court Abuja. As prosecution was looking to begin, MNK’s lawyer opposed, saying they are not here for trial. Justice Nyako then said, she initially recused herself from the case, but she was assigned back by the Chief Judge. That, they’d need to file a reassignment motion. As Kanu’s lawyers and the prosecution were arguing the need for such. Nnamdi Kanu demanded to speak. He said, he’s only in court out of respect. That, Nyako no longer has jurisdiction over his case. And he doesn’t understand why they always turn the law upside down when it comes to his case. He argued that, since Nyako had officially recused herself from his case. Then, the Chief Judge can’t impose, instead appeal. Kanu insisted Nyako is unprofessional and bias. Kanu said “If the Chief Judge disagrees, he should appeal the decision. You cannot preside over this case, not now, not today, not ever. You stand recused and you must leave my case. I don’t need you in my case. You are biased. Tell the Chief Judge that Nnamdi Kanu said so. This is not a court of law. This is a shrine to injustice and i will not subject myself to it”. After his submission, the prosecutor still wanted the court to go ahead with trial. MNK interrupted saying “Because of money they are paying you from the AGF’s office, a grown-up man like you is here supporting evil. The rule of law says you should go on appeal. The same Chief Judge, writing this stupid memo, I have recused him before. He sat on appeal, I took him to NJC and recused him. Why is he insisting on this one? He wants to embarrass your lordship by asking her to sit on this case.” Then Justice Nyako, decided Adjourn the case indefinitely due to the situation of things. Kanu again; “You have no jurisdiction to adjourn anything. None whatsoever. You cannot make an order without jurisdiction. The memo from the Chief Judge cannot confer jurisdiction upon you” Kanu insists they deliberately ignore the law due to their bias against him. That him agitating for Biafra is his right, that somehow they’ve changed his charge from treason to terrorism. He remains defiant, against Justice Nyako handling his trial. He alleged that Justice Nyako has reached some sort of agreement to give his head in exchange for the freedom of her husband and son, who are facing a criminal case. Hinting that Nyako never truely left the case. Basically, he just wants the court to obey the Nigerian constitution. He has been in detention since 2021. But Nigerians fear it has become political and he may need to be submissive, otherwise his pride will keep him incarcerated indefinitely. • Pay for what you use. Get detailed analytics on your energy consumption • water, electricity & gas. Inquire now: Vendr Utilities || iOS • Web • Android || [email protected] ||

Trending Explained

103,162 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Stop Islamic domination! Mosques shouldn't be playing prayers over loudspeakers Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Every Friday, a government-approved Islamic call to prayer is now being broadcast over downtown Regina. Some people have tried to dismiss concerns about this as nothing more than a complaint about noise. They're wrong. This isn't simply about noise pollution. It's about changing the character of our shared public spaces without public debate and placing an explicitly religious message at the centre of civic life. A source tells Rebel News that this permit was approved by Regina police without ever being brought before Regina city council for public discussion. That should concern every Canadian, regardless of their faith. This isn't like an innocuous church bell. Church bells are tones. They function much like a clock tower, marking the passage of time or calling a congregation together without conveying a specific theological message to everyone within earshot. The Adhan is something entirely different. It is a spoken religious proclamation: "Allah is the Greatest," "I bear witness that there is no god but Allah," "I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah." This is not merely a sound in the background of city life. It is an explicit religious and ideological message being amplified over an entire downtown core. For many Canadians, this raises a much larger question: should governments be facilitating the projection of a particular religion's message into our common civic spaces? Canada has long embraced freedom of religion. Every Canadian should be free to worship, pray, and practice their faith in peace. But freedom of religion is not the same thing as religious domination. No religion should expect the public square to conform to its practices, and no faith should enjoy special privileges that allow it to reshape our common spaces without public consent. Many Canadians also see this as part of a broader trend of increasingly visible Islamic claims over public spaces, whether through amplified calls to prayer or organized prayers in streets and public squares rather than in houses of worship. You may agree with those concerns, or you may not. But Canadians have every right to discuss them. At the same time, residents who object to this decision are now being met with police warnings about hate crimes and increased monitoring of online commentary. The effect is chilling. Many Canadians will reasonably wonder whether they can even voice their opposition without attracting police attention. Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Free citizens have the right to object to decisions made in their name, using public authority, and affecting their communities. That's not hate. That's democracy. If government agencies can authorize this in Regina without public consultation, they can do it anywhere. Today it's Regina. Tomorrow it could be your city. That's why we're launching sign the petition and fund out independent journalism. Because our shared civic spaces belong to everyone, and Canadians deserve a voice before they are fundamentally changed.

🚨 Stop Islamic domination! Mosques shouldn't be playing prayers over loudspeakers Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Every Friday, a government-approved Islamic call to prayer is now being broadcast over downtown Regina. Some people have tried to dismiss concerns about this as nothing more than a complaint about noise. They're wrong. This isn't simply about noise pollution. It's about changing the character of our shared public spaces without public debate and placing an explicitly religious message at the centre of civic life. A source tells Rebel News that this permit was approved by Regina police without ever being brought before Regina city council for public discussion. That should concern every Canadian, regardless of their faith. This isn't like an innocuous church bell. Church bells are tones. They function much like a clock tower, marking the passage of time or calling a congregation together without conveying a specific theological message to everyone within earshot. The Adhan is something entirely different. It is a spoken religious proclamation: "Allah is the Greatest," "I bear witness that there is no god but Allah," "I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah." This is not merely a sound in the background of city life. It is an explicit religious and ideological message being amplified over an entire downtown core. For many Canadians, this raises a much larger question: should governments be facilitating the projection of a particular religion's message into our common civic spaces? Canada has long embraced freedom of religion. Every Canadian should be free to worship, pray, and practice their faith in peace. But freedom of religion is not the same thing as religious domination. No religion should expect the public square to conform to its practices, and no faith should enjoy special privileges that allow it to reshape our common spaces without public consent. Many Canadians also see this as part of a broader trend of increasingly visible Islamic claims over public spaces, whether through amplified calls to prayer or organized prayers in streets and public squares rather than in houses of worship. You may agree with those concerns, or you may not. But Canadians have every right to discuss them. At the same time, residents who object to this decision are now being met with police warnings about hate crimes and increased monitoring of online commentary. The effect is chilling. Many Canadians will reasonably wonder whether they can even voice their opposition without attracting police attention. Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Free citizens have the right to object to decisions made in their name, using public authority, and affecting their communities. That's not hate. That's democracy. If government agencies can authorize this in Regina without public consultation, they can do it anywhere. Today it's Regina. Tomorrow it could be your city. That's why we're launching sign the petition and fund out independent journalism. Because our shared civic spaces belong to everyone, and Canadians deserve a voice before they are fundamentally changed.

Rebel News

17,635 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BREAKING: Outraged Biden blasts Trump after jury finds him guilty in liberal New York, says, "It's reckless, dangerous, and irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict." WATCH He says, "Before I begin my remarks, I just want to say a few words about what happened yesterday in New York City. The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case, and it was heard by a jury of twelve citizens. Twelve Americans. Twelve people like you, like millions of Americans who serve on juries. This jury was chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. "The jury heard five weeks of evidence. Five weeks. And after careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. He will be given the opportunity, as he should, to appeal that decision, just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. "It's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years, and it is literally the cornerstone of America. Our justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. It's as simple as that."

BREAKING: Outraged Biden blasts Trump after jury finds him guilty in liberal New York, says, "It's reckless, dangerous, and irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict." WATCH He says, "Before I begin my remarks, I just want to say a few words about what happened yesterday in New York City. The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case, and it was heard by a jury of twelve citizens. Twelve Americans. Twelve people like you, like millions of Americans who serve on juries. This jury was chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. "The jury heard five weeks of evidence. Five weeks. And after careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. He will be given the opportunity, as he should, to appeal that decision, just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. "It's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years, and it is literally the cornerstone of America. Our justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. It's as simple as that."

Simon Ateba

5,098,588 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🎥 “Who else is leading a cause that we will glorify in retrospect, but is being vilified in the present?” Speaking at the Nelson Mandela Foundation’s Global Leadership Forum, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani drew a direct line from Mandela’s refusal to abandon the Palestinian cause to the fight for global solidarity and Palestinian freedom today. Recalling how Mandela was branded a terrorist and pressured to renounce his principles, Mamdani asked: “Who are we treating today the way Madiba was treated before history declared him a messiah?” Citing Omar El Akkad’s book on the genocide in Gaza, “One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This,” Mamdani said “justice is not measured by where we stand after history has issued its verdict. It is measured by where we stand when the verdict is still being rendered.” “Why must Doctor Hussam Abu Safiya wait more than 18 months for freedom in Israeli detention,” he asked, “after the world watched him be kidnapped as he left his hospital?” “Why must we wait to practice solidarity until it no longer costs us anything?” Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani | CSPAN (Full speech available at the link below)

🎥 “Who else is leading a cause that we will glorify in retrospect, but is being vilified in the present?” Speaking at the Nelson Mandela Foundation’s Global Leadership Forum, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani drew a direct line from Mandela’s refusal to abandon the Palestinian cause to the fight for global solidarity and Palestinian freedom today. Recalling how Mandela was branded a terrorist and pressured to renounce his principles, Mamdani asked: “Who are we treating today the way Madiba was treated before history declared him a messiah?” Citing Omar El Akkad’s book on the genocide in Gaza, “One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This,” Mamdani said “justice is not measured by where we stand after history has issued its verdict. It is measured by where we stand when the verdict is still being rendered.” “Why must Doctor Hussam Abu Safiya wait more than 18 months for freedom in Israeli detention,” he asked, “after the world watched him be kidnapped as he left his hospital?” “Why must we wait to practice solidarity until it no longer costs us anything?” Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani | CSPAN (Full speech available at the link below)

Drop Site

274,289 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

#WesternSyria | #Jableh: The case of the young woman Batoul Alloush has been gaining additional traction, as the girl appeared in a video wearing a strict Islamic hijab (not the typical hijab worn by Syrian Sunni women), repeating the same claim that she has not been kidnapped and that she is on a religious migration (hijra) for the sake of God. Her mother and father then came forward several hours after their daughter’s video, speaking through the Anat Organization for Justice and Human Rights. They stated that their daughter was abducted from the university and that the security cameras showed no footage of her leaving on her own. Her father demanded that whoever kidnapped her be identified, and emphasized that his daughter, who is studying medical technology at the University of #Latakia, has full freedom to make her own personal choices. As for reports that his daughter had converted to a new religion (to Islam), the father said: “Whatever religion she wants to embrace that pleases God, we stand by our daughter, she can practice it at home, surrounded by her family.” The father spoke with deep emotion, saying that his daughter is the air he breathes, that she is the light of his eyes, and that her little sister is desperately longing to see her. He also called for those responsible for the abduction to be held accountable.

#WesternSyria | #Jableh: The case of the young woman Batoul Alloush has been gaining additional traction, as the girl appeared in a video wearing a strict Islamic hijab (not the typical hijab worn by Syrian Sunni women), repeating the same claim that she has not been kidnapped and that she is on a religious migration (hijra) for the sake of God. Her mother and father then came forward several hours after their daughter’s video, speaking through the Anat Organization for Justice and Human Rights. They stated that their daughter was abducted from the university and that the security cameras showed no footage of her leaving on her own. Her father demanded that whoever kidnapped her be identified, and emphasized that his daughter, who is studying medical technology at the University of #Latakia, has full freedom to make her own personal choices. As for reports that his daughter had converted to a new religion (to Islam), the father said: “Whatever religion she wants to embrace that pleases God, we stand by our daughter, she can practice it at home, surrounded by her family.” The father spoke with deep emotion, saying that his daughter is the air he breathes, that she is the light of his eyes, and that her little sister is desperately longing to see her. He also called for those responsible for the abduction to be held accountable.

Syria Justice Archive

14,375 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Refused to Convert. Refused to Marry. So He Shot Her Point-Blank! Nikita Tomar Fought Bravely Twice – But Political Pressure Buried Her First FIR Hear Her Mother's Heartbreaking Video Exposing the Shield of Power in Love Jihad Horror! 🔥 This spine-chilling story of Nikita Tomar, a Rajput girl, should be a motivation to all Hindu girls to fight against conversion and love jihad. Read on 👇 The murder of Nikita Tomar remains a chilling testament to the lethal intersection of obsession and entitlement. Shot point-blank in broad daylight outside her college in Ballabhgarh, the 20-year-old commerce student paid the ultimate price for her unwavering refusal to succumb to Tauseef’s demands for marriage and religious conversion. This case became a flashpoint for the national discourse on "Love Jihad," as investigations and family testimonies revealed a pattern of persistent harassment and a previous 2018 abduction attempt—complaints of which were allegedly suppressed through the weight of Tauseef's political lineage. The trial stripped away any veneer of a "lover's quarrel," exposing a calculated execution by a man emboldened by his family’s deep-rooted ties to the Congress party; Tauseef is the grandson of former MLA Kabir Ahmed and related to influential political figures like Aftab Ahmed. Tauseef is a cousin of Congress’ Nuh MLA Aftab Ahmed and it was allegedly this connection that protected him when he had reportedly abducted Nikita in 2018. The case was withdrawn by Nikita’s family later, allegedly due to pressure from Touseef’s relatives Despite the shadow of political clout that the Tomar family claimed had shielded him for years, a fast-track court delivered a landmark verdict in March 2021, sentencing Tauseef and his accomplice to life imprisonment. Nikita's tragic death not only fueled a demand for "complete justice" through the death penalty but also acted as the primary catalyst for the Haryana government to enact stringent legislation against forced religious conversions. In direct response to the public outcry following Nikita Tomar's murder, the Haryana government passed the Haryana Prevention of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2022. This law was specifically designed to address cases where marriage or "allurement" is used as a tool for forced religious conversion—often referred to in political discourse as "Love Jihad." Forced Conversion, Forced Marriage Refusal is equal to a death sentence? This is Love Jihad's Deadly Face. Wake Up Bharat & Hindu Girls. Follow Trun on Notifications & Stay tuned for more to know more real incidents like Nikita Tomar's story. Har Har Mahadev 🙏 🔱 #LoveJihad #HinduAwakening #RudraRising

Refused to Convert. Refused to Marry. So He Shot Her Point-Blank! Nikita Tomar Fought Bravely Twice – But Political Pressure Buried Her First FIR Hear Her Mother's Heartbreaking Video Exposing the Shield of Power in Love Jihad Horror! 🔥 This spine-chilling story of Nikita Tomar, a Rajput girl, should be a motivation to all Hindu girls to fight against conversion and love jihad. Read on 👇 The murder of Nikita Tomar remains a chilling testament to the lethal intersection of obsession and entitlement. Shot point-blank in broad daylight outside her college in Ballabhgarh, the 20-year-old commerce student paid the ultimate price for her unwavering refusal to succumb to Tauseef’s demands for marriage and religious conversion. This case became a flashpoint for the national discourse on "Love Jihad," as investigations and family testimonies revealed a pattern of persistent harassment and a previous 2018 abduction attempt—complaints of which were allegedly suppressed through the weight of Tauseef's political lineage. The trial stripped away any veneer of a "lover's quarrel," exposing a calculated execution by a man emboldened by his family’s deep-rooted ties to the Congress party; Tauseef is the grandson of former MLA Kabir Ahmed and related to influential political figures like Aftab Ahmed. Tauseef is a cousin of Congress’ Nuh MLA Aftab Ahmed and it was allegedly this connection that protected him when he had reportedly abducted Nikita in 2018. The case was withdrawn by Nikita’s family later, allegedly due to pressure from Touseef’s relatives Despite the shadow of political clout that the Tomar family claimed had shielded him for years, a fast-track court delivered a landmark verdict in March 2021, sentencing Tauseef and his accomplice to life imprisonment. Nikita's tragic death not only fueled a demand for "complete justice" through the death penalty but also acted as the primary catalyst for the Haryana government to enact stringent legislation against forced religious conversions. In direct response to the public outcry following Nikita Tomar's murder, the Haryana government passed the Haryana Prevention of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2022. This law was specifically designed to address cases where marriage or "allurement" is used as a tool for forced religious conversion—often referred to in political discourse as "Love Jihad." Forced Conversion, Forced Marriage Refusal is equal to a death sentence? This is Love Jihad's Deadly Face. Wake Up Bharat & Hindu Girls. Follow Trun on Notifications & Stay tuned for more to know more real incidents like Nikita Tomar's story. Har Har Mahadev 🙏 🔱 #LoveJihad #HinduAwakening #RudraRising

𝗔𝗵𝗮𝗺 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗵𝗺𝗮𝘀𝗺𝗶

128,817 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

⚠️ WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT ⚠️ Yesterday night, I intervened to rescue a young man from being killed by boda boda riders after he allegedly stole a phone. What he did was wrong, but taking his life is not the solution. We must remember: no one has the right to take the law into their own hands. For someone to steal, there is often something pushing them into it but that does not justify the crime, and it certainly does not justify mob justice. I have always said there is no difference between a person who steals billions of taxpayers’ money and one who steals a phone. Justice must be applied fairly and equally. If we believe in the rule of law, then let every offender face the legal system not violence. I call upon the criminal justice system to act firmly and fairly so as to restore public confidence, which many feel has been lost. At the same time, this is a clear warning to all thieves whether petty or high-level: crime has consequences. Choose a better path while you still can. Stealing will only destroy your future. Let us reject mob justice and uphold humanity, dignity, and the rule of law.

⚠️ WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT ⚠️ Yesterday night, I intervened to rescue a young man from being killed by boda boda riders after he allegedly stole a phone. What he did was wrong, but taking his life is not the solution. We must remember: no one has the right to take the law into their own hands. For someone to steal, there is often something pushing them into it but that does not justify the crime, and it certainly does not justify mob justice. I have always said there is no difference between a person who steals billions of taxpayers’ money and one who steals a phone. Justice must be applied fairly and equally. If we believe in the rule of law, then let every offender face the legal system not violence. I call upon the criminal justice system to act firmly and fairly so as to restore public confidence, which many feel has been lost. At the same time, this is a clear warning to all thieves whether petty or high-level: crime has consequences. Choose a better path while you still can. Stealing will only destroy your future. Let us reject mob justice and uphold humanity, dignity, and the rule of law.

Geoffrey Mosiria

10,727 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

#WATCH | On a lawyer attempting to throw an object at CJI BR Gavai, President of Supreme Court Bar Association, Senior Advocate Vikas Singh says, "...The second aspect that needs consideration is the role of social media these days in escalating things out of proportion. This original case was a sort of PIL where somebody wanted a Hindu deity which had broken down to be constructed. CJI rightly said that these are matters for the authorities to consider, because there are ASI issues if it is an archaeological structure and religious issues as well. So, accordingly, the petition was dismissed...That statement was misrepresented by social media to give an impression as if the CJI had insulted the deity... This lawyer, for the purpose of seeking publicity has done this exercise and I will beseech the media and social media not to give publicity to this lawyer because his whole purpose is to get publicity. Even if the CJI feels that no action needs to be taken and he has shown a large heart, I think we as the Bar Association owe a duty to the institution and the Bar Council of India owes a duty to the profession. So, after deliberating on this issue in our executive committee will decide on taking action. And I am sure that Bar Council of India should take some action for such conduct because it is completely unbecoming of an advocate. This is something to be condemned in the strongest words so that it does not recur in the future..." (06.10.2025)

#WATCH | On a lawyer attempting to throw an object at CJI BR Gavai, President of Supreme Court Bar Association, Senior Advocate Vikas Singh says, "...The second aspect that needs consideration is the role of social media these days in escalating things out of proportion. This original case was a sort of PIL where somebody wanted a Hindu deity which had broken down to be constructed. CJI rightly said that these are matters for the authorities to consider, because there are ASI issues if it is an archaeological structure and religious issues as well. So, accordingly, the petition was dismissed...That statement was misrepresented by social media to give an impression as if the CJI had insulted the deity... This lawyer, for the purpose of seeking publicity has done this exercise and I will beseech the media and social media not to give publicity to this lawyer because his whole purpose is to get publicity. Even if the CJI feels that no action needs to be taken and he has shown a large heart, I think we as the Bar Association owe a duty to the institution and the Bar Council of India owes a duty to the profession. So, after deliberating on this issue in our executive committee will decide on taking action. And I am sure that Bar Council of India should take some action for such conduct because it is completely unbecoming of an advocate. This is something to be condemned in the strongest words so that it does not recur in the future..." (06.10.2025)

ANI

123,889 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

OFFICIAL PUBLIC NOTICE / INCIDENT REPORT This report is made on behalf of a Nigerian woman, a lawful property owner and practitioner of traditional religion (ONÍṢẸ̀ṢẸ). She legally built a house in Ilorin, Kwara State, which is her constitutional right as a citizen of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. From the beginning of her presence in this Ilorin Muslim community, some individuals openly stated that they did not want an ONÍṢẸ̀ṢẸ practitioner living among them. She was repeatedly threatened and intimidated solely because of her religious practice. Due to these threats, she reported the matter to the nearest police station in Ilorin. The police summoned the individuals involved and warned them that she has a legal right to live and build a house in any community of her choice in Nigeria. Despite this police warning, the threats escalated. She was directly told: “Since your house is what is keeping you here in our midst, if you refuse to stop your traditional religion practice, get ready to see your house set ablaze.” She initially considered this an empty threat. However, on January 1st 2026, while she was away attending the Osun Festival at her other residence, a neighbor urgently called to inform her that her house in Ilorin was on fire. The house was later confirmed to have been burnt, validating the earlier threats. This was not an accident. This was arson following explicit religious threats. This report is shared: • For public record • For her safety • For accountability • To notify authorities, media, and human-rights organizations Nigeria belongs to all Nigerians. No woman should be threatened, attacked, or displaced because of her religion or belief. Justice will be pursued. #Ilorin #KwaraState #JusticeForOnisese #ReligiousFreedom #StopReligiousIntolerance #HumanRights #Nigeria

OFFICIAL PUBLIC NOTICE / INCIDENT REPORT This report is made on behalf of a Nigerian woman, a lawful property owner and practitioner of traditional religion (ONÍṢẸ̀ṢẸ). She legally built a house in Ilorin, Kwara State, which is her constitutional right as a citizen of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. From the beginning of her presence in this Ilorin Muslim community, some individuals openly stated that they did not want an ONÍṢẸ̀ṢẸ practitioner living among them. She was repeatedly threatened and intimidated solely because of her religious practice. Due to these threats, she reported the matter to the nearest police station in Ilorin. The police summoned the individuals involved and warned them that she has a legal right to live and build a house in any community of her choice in Nigeria. Despite this police warning, the threats escalated. She was directly told: “Since your house is what is keeping you here in our midst, if you refuse to stop your traditional religion practice, get ready to see your house set ablaze.” She initially considered this an empty threat. However, on January 1st 2026, while she was away attending the Osun Festival at her other residence, a neighbor urgently called to inform her that her house in Ilorin was on fire. The house was later confirmed to have been burnt, validating the earlier threats. This was not an accident. This was arson following explicit religious threats. This report is shared: • For public record • For her safety • For accountability • To notify authorities, media, and human-rights organizations Nigeria belongs to all Nigerians. No woman should be threatened, attacked, or displaced because of her religion or belief. Justice will be pursued. #Ilorin #KwaraState #JusticeForOnisese #ReligiousFreedom #StopReligiousIntolerance #HumanRights #Nigeria

Bennylee

1,116,668 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten