Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Starbucks shift supervisor says she has been fired from Starbucks and now she doesn’t have a scholarship anymore to pay for college because it was provided by Starbucks She says she took 4 expired cake pops from the pastry case home for her kids She says Starbucks doesn’t really...

638,345 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,233,356 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Rosie O’Donnell reveals she got the pronoun “they” tattooed on her wrist for her nonbinary daughter, thinking she’d be touched. She didn’t give “two shits.” Rosie got the tattoo because she kept calling her daughter “she” when her daughter wanted to be called “they.” The tattoo was supposed to be a reminder to use “they/them” pronouns. But while telling the story, Rosie still can't get the pronouns right. 😂 AMY POEHLER: "Can you tell us where the title Common Knowledge comes from? 'Cause I love this." ROSIE: "This is a true story. So she — they, they. And it's a they/them." POEHLER: "Yep." ROSIE: "That's the pronouns that they choose. But it's very hard, honey." POEHLER: "I know. And I love that you're constantly correcting in real time, like we all do. It's really beautiful. And it really matters to them." ROSIE: "And I know it matters to them. And so when they [my daughter] first told me that it was they/them, I tried my best, but I kept saying 'she.' And so they wrote on a cardboard paper 'they,' and then they would hold it up above their head every time I said she, like John Cusack in Say Anything with the boombox, just staring at me, you know?" ROSIE: "And so I took her to my cousin's tattoo shop with the 'they' in her handwriting, and I had it tattooed on my wrist so that I would never forget, that it would remind me. And I thought she'd be very touched, and she didn't give two shits." [Amy Poehler bursts into laughter] ROSIE: "She could not care less! And I just said she. I just did it again in the 'they' story. I messed it up. But, yeah."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

270,866 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

When I was traveling to NC I bought a window seat because I wanted to enjoy the scenery, it was slightly more expensive than a normal seat. When I got boarded, I went to my tow and I looked at my seat and there was a kid sitting there. I was confused because this was the seat I paid for, I had no idea who the kid was and why they were in my seat. A woman came up and handed some snacks to the kid and then sat down at the seat next to the kid and I asked her if they were in the right seat and she said yes. I said the window seat was mine and showed the ticket. She said well her daughter wanted to sit there, I said well if she did you should have paid for it because I did. She asked if I had kids and I said no, and she said well when you do you will appreciate it because things like this will keep them quiet during the flight. Once again I said that’s fine but I paid for this for a reason, you should have planned ahead. I ended up having to get an attendant who made them move, but the woman wasn’t quiet about it she started calling me selfish and what kind of person would take stuff away from a kid. I said the kind of person that paid for the things they feel entitled to. I did end up feeling bad about it later but it wasn’t really my problem, I didn’t want to be emotionally blackmailed because she didn’t want to pay more money for that set. This woman moved seats on her own and was told she would be booted if she didn’t sit in her assigned seat. I’m sure there is a reason behind this, I think I read an article once that said it was due to weight and such. Would you move though? It doesn’t seem like much of a big deal to me.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

3,125,166 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Starbucks is the largest unregulated bank in America. They are hoarding almost $2 billion of your money. And it's completely by design. They don't just sell coffee. They've built one of the largest legal money schemes in history... Right now, Starbucks is holding $1.85 billion in gift card and app balances. Money that customers loaded but never spent. To put that in perspective: 85% of US banks have less than $1 billion in total deposits. Starbucks holds more customer cash than most actual banks. But here's the difference: Banks pay you interest to hold your money. Starbucks pays you nothing. Banks have to keep cash reserves in case you want to withdraw. Starbucks just needs to stock coffee and muffins. Banks are regulated by the federal government. Starbucks answers to no one. The CEO of South Korea's third-largest bank said it publicly: "Starbucks is an unregulated bank, not a coffee company." So how did they build this financial empire? It started with gift cards in 2001. Simple idea: load money, buy coffee later. But Starbucks noticed something interesting. People weren't redeeming all their gift cards. A $25 card might have $3.47 left on it forever. That leftover money? Pure profit. They call it "breakage." In 2024 alone, Starbucks made $207 million from money people loaded but never spent. Free money. No coffee served. But they didn't stop there. They engineered the entire system to maximize breakage. First, they made gift cards year-round items instead of just holiday gifts. Then they launched the Starbucks app. The app forces you to pre-load money before ordering. You can't just pay $6.84 for your latte. You have to load $10 minimum. Now you've got $3.16 sitting in their system. That's not a bug. That's the business model. Then they added auto-reload. Set it up once, and Starbucks automatically charges your card whenever your balance drops. Money is flowing in constantly. Most people forget it's even happening. Then they added rewards. You earn more points by paying with your Starbucks balance than with a credit card. So you're incentivized to keep money locked in their system. The trap is airtight. A consumer complaint filed in Washington State called it an "involuntary subscription." Their exact words: "This Catch-22 traps customers in a cycle that resembles an involuntary subscription." You load money to buy coffee. You have a leftover balance. You come back to use it. You load more money. The cycle never ends. Think about what Starbucks actually built: They collect billions in deposits. They pay no interest. They have no withdrawal obligations. They keep 10-13% of all deposits as pure profit. They're not regulated as a financial institution. Any bank would kill for this model. But they'd go to prison for trying it. Starbucks does it in plain sight....

Zyan

269,570 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce