Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Starlink in South Africa
90,045 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)
11 Kommentare

Sell and buying 50% of TikTok is different from GIVING 30% for free.

Stargazing is out now

Well explained!

Giving wealthy people free access to 30% of a company is not “levelling the playing field”.

I don’t get why this is an issue when China does it with all of these companies that come into their country. They even go as far an getting Joiny ventures and combines names locally with established brand companies. The west must accept that BEE is here to stay .

Yeah, cool, let’s: Deprive rural citizens cheap or free reliable data/calls, ensure the current Voda’s and MTN etc to continue their sh*t service monopoly and rely on the exemplary reputation of BEE enforced shareholder companies. Reminder: only the few get rich! Ja Ja, lekka.

And this is why he is creating racial tension

Is the requirement only to have black skin and be born in South Africa. I can see how that might scare away investors

Listening is a skill, she said every country has its own laws akin to 🇺🇸 with TikTok. The two are not the same. Starlink could sell to black investors, there are options. Love them or hate them, he made concessions in Zim. Laws are laws, follow them or leave

That's not the case of Nigeria 🇳🇬, in Nigeria, government agencies and officials often compromise on ethics when offered bribes, leading to a lack of accountability and a culture of corruption.@NGRPresident @officialABAT

You got it mix up 30% must be given to BBBEEE they are not buying shares/stake,they are given free share/stake that difference, Elon and his group has offer 4 all the companies he own money, just like his about to do with Open AI 97.7 billion, what offer did BBBEEE offer Elon
