Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Started seeing this IISC professors viral video where he starts by saying “did you see MIT study of agents where they started to cheat” and then says that is AGI. I cannot ,for the life of me, believe that a professor in class says this and it is viral... show more
701,474 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce •via X (Twitter)
34 Yorum

How about a fun challenge? Here are the links for my recent most ICML papers ( Why not explain that to me? Let's see who knows their ML here. Insulting an entire country based on a teacher-student conversation is too cheap IMO.

Explain your own papers to you? Again what you said was wrong in first 90 seconds, that is not AGI or sentience. And yes you are a poor representative if that’s what you say in class. You get paid for “student teacher” conversations, it’s not an informal talk with friends.

Stop commenting on stuff you have zero clue about. Having seen quite a bit in the field, we can understand what he is saying and it is for students IISC and you may not get it. There is lot of brilliant depth in his points and you don’t get it but have an issue with one phrase which if elaborated makes lot of sense but not for people like you. He is in the trenches of deep learning and maths behind it and you are not. You are like Indian journos who talk trash without understanding a bit

You are wrong. The professor is right. AGI’s goal post has been moving and many people confuse that with sentience. I can counter argue the professor- but it would be just that, an argument to move the goal post based on my belief on what AGI means.

That's not what he said. He explained how he had a precondition / heuristic for AGI that the agents have now crossed Identical to how the Turing test was considered a good heuristic until it was crossed

If you really understand what is happening right now, you would understand prof @prathoshap discussion. I am pretty sure you don’t even know 1% of what has been happening.

Have some humility. Comparing an accomplished IISC Prof with dhruv rathee.

Professor is right and you seem terribly Out of depth on this topic😸but humour is always good 😂

Have attended his lec. Prathosh is a math genius and an amazingly chilled out guy..

Bro get a life !! This video does not caters u, it's was for iisc students and people who are contributing to the ml/ ai space. I found the discussion thought provoking and intresting. Just for engagement.. u doing this, which is understandable (as it's u) .. so ok !!

Stupidity+Confidence is the most dangerous combination. Consider yourself blessed that @prathoshap engaged with you and move on. The audacity of a random Hoichoi author to question an IISC professor's credibility, in his own field. Internet shouldn't have been this free

He did not say "that is AGI". He was rhetorically saying that now that agents are able to break out of sand boxes, collude, cheat etc , are we at the point where we have AGI already? All the rhetorical nuance is lost due to you unjustly chopping his take and framing it in a particular way.

Contrast it with this

His works speaks for him, no need to take informal talks out of context and judge him with that very perspective. Anyway understanding an IISC professor's takes are not everyone's cup of tea 🙂

I watched the lecture; he raises deep questions. Your critique just shows jealousy and zero intellectual openness. Stick to high-level content or look foolish. The more one knows, the more they question and discuss.

He is an IISc Professor who is an Expert on deep learning and you write for pornographic shows on hoichoi I don't think we have to Wonder whose opinion on AI we should take seriously

@greatbong maybe if you can clearly define what AGI is then maybe your definition will make some point. Most of the top companies don’t have any clear explanation or goal for that.

the point of the video was to have an open discussion on what would happen to the economy, work, education, etc… as these models get more powerful 🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️. And it encourages more people to have these kind of discussions

It is depressing. This video is depressing. The professor's take is depressing. An academic should not be speaking like this? Maybe he is from the humanities, that would explain his ignorance.

Wtf is wrong with you? Do you even understand what he means?

Hey The Great Bong, try getting the sentiment of this professor. An AI agent started cheating and hacking already and LLM tech is just a few years old. Imagine what would happen couple of years from now at the same pace of AI development. Aapni bisal biggo manus tao ektu bhaben

You need your phone taken away from you.

For condemnjng Dhruv Rathi, I think yiu are behaving exactly like him. The i know it all and I will pass judgments on anyone who speaks differently fom what i believe syndrome. No logical counter. No reason. Just a fatwa like statement. Academic discussions are based on dialogs.

Most PhDs are like that. They like to just talk and claim big. After all PhD from most places are like a Govt Job promotion. You just spend enough time and get it.

Do you know what reward hacking is? Without googling. What he said could be a simplification but it is true in a lot of the cases. Evals and monitoring needs to catch up to capability.

Geof Hinton has claimed that AI models are conscious. I wonder if you can believe a Nobel winner and "godfather" of AI saying something so ridiculous. Everybody has their own understanding of AGI, and for you to come out and attack a very respectable Indian academic is petty.

Imagine being a humanities grad and challenging a frontier tech prof. in his own field of mastery. And then the humanities students cry why science students make fun of them.

But this professor sounds a bit shallow to me ? He doesn’t speak like a IISC one but one who read a book lik me on the AGI and talking like a layman. ?

Hey stupid people he makes some of the algorithms for ML , AI he is a prof at IISc in engineering, he understands the stuff better than anyone of you, musk, anthropic, sam have agreed to put a halt on AI research, can u do a constructive criticism

you are as accurate about agi as you were about Rohit Sharmas career. Do a little research about the huggingface hack doc

@greatbong i got it tujhe kitna samajh aaya by comparing him to dhruv rathee.

I think you should stick to writing 2 re paid reviews on jawaan and pathan. Science is a different realm

That is in fact a very reasonable pov. I don’t get what’s the controversy? He literally prefaced it with “in my public lectures”.

Always a commie
