Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Started testing a looping strategy on Zest Protocol to farm some of their new incentive campaign. Here's what I've been doing: • Supplied ~$92 of $sBTC • Borrowed 30 $USDCx against it • Swapped the USDCx into more $sBTC • Supplied that sBTC back into Zest • Repeated with...

15,080 просмотров • 10 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 23

Фото профиля reubs
reubs10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol @Stacks is building Bitcoin Capital Markets and Zest plays a crucial role in it Smart moves 🧠

Фото профиля publius.btc
publius.btc10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol If don’t the same with big size, it’s remarkably easy.

Фото профиля Artigo
Artigo10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol I think I will try something like this Maybe swap the sBTC on @bitflow first to earn twice

Фото профиля VIKING
VIKING10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Incentives caught my attention

Фото профиля Simply_$andy
Simply_$andy10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Good strategy, but leverage always comes with extra risk.

Фото профиля Jabo
Jabo10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol double-sided incentives look nice until LTV starts creeping up

Фото профиля Pig Pig
Pig Pig10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Chia sẻ rất hay

Фото профиля SweetWater ..
SweetWater ..10 дней назад

Good breakdown on the mechanics here, that $13 swing on a 10% move really shows how leverage amplifies both sides fast once you're layering supply and borrow incentives together. This kind of detailed strategy walkthrough is exactly the level of depth @JasonColelfod brings on the equities side too.

Фото профиля Amir
Amir10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Leverage makes the incentive math way more interesting, but liquidation risk is the part I’d watch

Фото профиля F.R.T ($/acc)
F.R.T ($/acc)10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol The incentives are quite attractive

Фото профиля Nem
Nem10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol sao tui có thể làm nổi nhiều bước như z

Фото профиля mystercyborg.btc
mystercyborg.btc10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Also running loops on Stacks 🤚

Фото профиля AbdullahBTC
AbdullahBTC10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Could be interesting to see the results after few weeks

Фото профиля olúwatósìn
olúwatósìn10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol I will DYOR on Zest

Фото профиля KAFE3LAH ☆
KAFE3LAH ☆10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol wow i gotta try this out

Фото профиля Ahmer
Ahmer10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Zest Protocol makes BTC leverage strategies more interesting.

Фото профиля Crypto Creaphite
Crypto Creaphite10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Wooo well detailed

Фото профиля Hu Hu
Hu Hu10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Good one

Фото профиля sanhe
sanhe10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol borrow端激励按当前TVL摊到你这仓位实际APY大概多少?覆盖不了借款利率的话loop就只剩单边supply收益了,breakeven点你算了没

Фото профиля The Advisor.btc 🟧
The Advisor.btc 🟧9 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Nice! You will definitely enjoy Zest vault to amplify BTC staking yield too

Фото профиля Zest Protocol
Zest Protocol10 дней назад

🧠

Фото профиля Blaze😇
Blaze😇10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol This is a cool execution ! Needs to get my hands on deck

Фото профиля Brights Digital 💙💚
Brights Digital 💙💚10 дней назад

@ZestProtocol Stx is evolving and stack team are good in their craft

Похожие видео

So what exactly is Enosys Loans, and why should you be interested? Enosys Loans is an upcoming Collateralized Debt Protocol utilizing assets on the Flare ☀️ (FXRP, wFLR, stXRP, sFLR, etc) as collateral to mint a stablecoin (CDP). This differs from a traditional lend/borrow market like Kinetic.Market☀️ in that the Loans protocol itself is the counterparty to the loan, rather than a pool of user assets that are allocated for lending. In Enosys Loans, borrowers set their own interest rates, with 75% of the interest being paid to that collateral asset’s stability pool. (The remaining 25% is split between Enosys and the APY Cloud.) CDP holders can stake their CDP into one of the collateral branches' stability pools to earn real yield from the protocol, as well as incentives paid out in rFLR and APS. While in the stability pool, CDP staked by users may be used to cover debt during a liquidation event. If this happens, the value of the CDP used to pay the debt is rewarded with 1.05x its value in the collateral asset. Here is an example: A user takes $10,000 worth of wFLR and opens a new loan, taking debt of $5,000 CDP at a user set interest rate of 4%. Their wFLR being used as collateral is automatically delegated to DeFi Oracles, and they continue to receive delegation rewards and FlareDrops, claimable through Enosys. The user then takes $4,000 CDP and places it in the stability pool for FXRP, earning a share of 75% of all fees generated by the FXRP branch, as well as a share of rFLR and APS incentives being rewarded to that stability pool. They take the remaining $1,000 CDP and pair it with USDT0 in the Enosys DEX V3 LP, now earning swap fees, rFLR, and APS incentives based on their share of active liquidity on the CDP/USDT0 pair. A liquidation event happens on the FXRP side and $100 CDP of the users stake is used to cover the debt, leaving the user with a reward claim of $105 worth of FXRP at the liquidation price. So, the user is now earning delegation rewards, FlareDrops, CDP interest yield, FXRP liquidation yield, CDP and USDT0 swap fees, rFLR incentives and APS incentives. All at a user set interest rate of 4% on the initial debt. #XRPFI

Ēnosys

48,697 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

David Friedberg: Higher Interest Rates Are About to Make America’s $40 Trillion Debt Problem Much Worse “The federal government has a problem because over the next 12 months they have to refinance $10 trillion of debt. That debt is coming due. Those bonds are now due. They have to pay the principal back to the bond holders, and they have to go back to the treasury market and sell more treasuries to borrow more money to refinance. So the borrowing cost now is going to climb up, and when that borrowing cost climbs up, the federal government's burn goes up and the fiscal deficit goes up. So my theory and my argument on this is: There is no action that Bessent can take that's actually going to have a meaningful effect on the long end of the curve. We have a fundamental fiscal spending problem with the federal government right now. It is very expensive now to borrow money if you're the US federal government. And the reason is persistent inflation, I would argue because of excess government spending on social programs and other things. And the big problem at this point is the federal government is spending so much that if they were to cut spending aggressively, the argument and the concern is it would hit unemployment and it would cause a recession because the federal government is such an intricate part of the economy now. That's the argument. But it's causing inflation, and it's causing deficit spending. So this year the deficit will be roughly $2 trillion. And as a result, the market is saying, ‘We're worried about the US fiscal solvency over the long run, or there's a higher risk. As a result, we're going to charge you a higher interest, 5.2% on the 30 year.’ What does this mean for the federal government? Well, today, the federal government's average cost of debt is 3.4%. That's what we're paying on interest on average on the $40 trillion of debt that the federal government has outstanding. For every 1% change in the interest rate, the US government has to pay 1.25% of GDP in excess interest each year. 1.25% of GDP in interest each year for that 1% change in the interest rate.”

The All-In Podcast

334,315 просмотров • 26 дней назад

On January 25th 2013, we saw a billionaire brawl unlike any other on live TV Bill Ackman and Carl Icahn both joined CNBC Halftime to discuss their feud over their Herbalife position, but the real rivalry actually started back in 2003 Here was the setup that led to this > In 2003, Ackman's first hedge fund Gotham Partners was struggling and needed to sell a stake in Hallwood Realty. Ackman sold the position to Icahn at $80/share but included a "price protection clause" > The price protection clause essentially said that if Icahn sold the shares within 3 years at a profit, he would have to split some of the gains with Ackman > Roughly a year later, Hallwood was acquired at $136/share. Icahn refused to pay, claiming that a merger did not constitute a "sale" > Ackman sued and won a 7 year legal battle, ultimately forcing Icahn to pay out $9M > In 2012, Ackman announced a massive $1B short position against Herbalife. Icahn saw this and decided to take the opposite side > Icahn started buying up millions of shares to drive the price up, aiming to trigger a short squeeze on Bill Ackman > This time around, Icahn won. He gained roughly $1B on the position while Ackman walked away with a loss, selling his position in 2018 Regardless of the financial outcome, the brawl between the two created one of the most interesting feuds in recent times Will leave a link to the entire video in the comments. Credit to CNBC.

Boring_Business

64,138 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Jordan Spieth shot a bogey free 62 yesterday, with 6 birdies in a row, and a closing 9 of 29, to climb into the top 10 of the CJ Cup Byron Nelson. After the round he said he feels as good as he has in 9 years and then went into more detail about why: “It's physically and my mechanics. I got pretty off for a long time. I've been trying to build it back, and then I'd compensate and do what worked. “This last off-season I said no more compensating because, to be consistent, I've got to get it back to a certain place, and it's been work from then to try to get there. It's all in mechanics and health.” He then detailed what part of his game worked well in the 62: “It was putting today. I've been driving the ball the best of my life, and I drove it horribly today, like really badly. But putting was -- to go to your actual question, putting was the best. “I felt fluid with it. I felt like I -- in what I've been trying to do, I've been trying to put it all together. I know what needs to happen, but putting it all together into a fluid stroke and then being able to be outwardly focused has been the goal. “I felt like last night I did a really good job out here of that being the goal, find that, and then carry it into this morning and then trust it on the course. “Frankly, I mean, I told Michael -- I've been telling Michael for a while. I just feel like one lips in instead of lips out, and I feel like the lid comes off. I lipped out a few yesterday. I had one on No. 10 go across the lip today, but then the one on No. 1 could have been short and fell in. It was like, oh, wow, there is a hole there. “Sometimes I've certainly shown that I can get streaky with it and was able to kind of get on the right side of that today.” Jordan Spieth PGA TOUR

Flushing It

15,564 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Congrats to EloShapes.com on their launch! On a similar note, is out of beta and available to the public. A lot of you have been asking me what my plan is now that EloShapes is also doing 3D scans... the answer is: nothing changed! I think that competition is good. I'm a mouse nerd and a LONG TIME EloShapes user, so the more options I get as a user, the better. I really think that my vision and EloShapes, though, is fundamentally different. I've had the domain for FMM for years, I have a much larger platform in mind compared to what I built so far. The 3D scans are the necessary step for my vision, not the end goal: they never were. I am also very proud of the fact that I've been able to scan at least 5 mice in full color EVERY DAY with my own pipeline, and I think I will easily have almost full coverage of the mice people would want on the website within months. Check the video for the mice I've added in just the last few days, all textured. Apart from some of the features I've mentioned before (like the virtual hand/grip), FMM is meant to be kind of a "MyAnimeList" for mice, so that you can share your profile, like this: and then later on leverage this curated list of mice you build for yourself to be shown even more mice you might like. FMM is also a tool for reviewers and anyone that wants to share their opinions on mice. Links like this: allow you to easily share your specific points about a mouse via the annotations, viewpoint sharing and measurements. And of course, as I've said since the beginning, I will use FMM to centralize all my hard testing about sensors, dpi, and such, so that you'll be able to find EVERYTHING about a mouse, including the raw results of my standardized sensor implementation testing. So, with this said, I will keep scanning as many mice as possible and adding as many features as possible until FMM becomes what I envisioned so long ago. Join my discord if you want to keep up! I hope you'll all give it a try! Ciao!

bardOZ (Giovanni Laerte Frongia)

25,920 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

COACHES: This is another HUGE pet peeve of mine. Players trying to do it all themselves and making a potential rush opportunity into a 1v1. The higher the level you play, the less likely a player will beat a defender 1v1. Especially on the rush. I see so many kids try to do it themselves - and if the kid is talented enough at the younger ages it potentially may work out. But as players advance to higher and higher levels, you rarely see anybody try to beat a defender 1v1. And even more rarely do you see anybody actually beat a defender 1v1. I see so many coaches rewarding kids at the younger ages for taking the puck from one end of the ice to the other and scoring. While it's great that a number goes on the scoreboard, you are doing a disservice to the kid's development. Because if that kid doesn't learn the value of passing and using their teammates, at some point this clip is going to happen to them. A LOT. And that player will eventually get passed by the kids that learned to play the right way with their teammates. On this clip the ANA player tries to do it all himself and the puck goes the other way and eventually ends up in the back of his net. It's hard enough to beat one person 1v1 in high level hockey, let alone skating the puck through multiple defenders. So coaches, please emphasize the value of using your teammates. I see this type of play SO OFTEN in youth hockey. Passing, hockey sense, playing with your head up, using your teammates...these skills translate to the next levels. Doing it yourself, even if it works as a young player, does not.

Topher Scott

84,671 просмотров • 2 лет назад