Stella Assange: "This case is about whether state crimes can continue unpunished, unscrutinized - Julian's freedom is the only antidote. Julian Assange is the worlds most famous political prisoner...and the world is watching" Stella Assange #FreeAssange #FreeAssangeNOW

@Stella_Assange Praying for him! #FreeAssangeNOW

The concept of the state being able to commit crimes without being monitored is a contentious issue that raises important questions about the balance of power and accountability within a society. It is widely accepted that the state should be held to a higher standard of behavior and that it is not above the law. However, there are instances where the state may engage in criminal activities for the sake of national security or other compelling reasons. In these cases, the question arises: should the state be allowed to commit crimes without being monitored? The idea of the state committing crimes without oversight is a troubling one. The state is supposed to be the embodiment of the rule of law, and its actions are expected to be held to the highest ethical and moral standards. When the state engages in criminal activities, it undermines the legitimacy of its authority and erodes public trust. This is particularly concerning in democratic societies where the government is supposed to act in the best interest of the people and be accountable to them. One of the main arguments against allowing the state to commit crimes without being monitored is that it sets a dangerous precedent. If the state is permitted to engage in unlawful behavior without consequences, it creates a slippery slope where abuses of power can occur unchecked. This can lead to a breakdown of the rule of law and the erosion of civil liberties. Furthermore, without proper oversight, the state could misuse its power and engage in criminal activities for its own benefit rather than for the greater good of society. On the other hand, there are instances where the state may need to engage in criminal activities for legitimate reasons, such as national security or law enforcement operations. In these cases, the state may argue that it is necessary to keep its actions secret in order to protect the public and prevent harm. However, even in these situations, there should be some form of oversight to ensure that the state does not abuse its power and that its actions are proportionate and justified.

@Stella_Assange The Whole World Stands with Julian Assange , Freedom of Speech, Truth , and Free Journalism !🙏♥️🌹

@Snowden @Stella_Assange #FreeAssangeNOW

@WISEUpAction @Stella_Assange Stella in truly Stella so strong and inspiring❤️ The court received the evidence They are fully aware of US plans to assassinate Julian which thwarts any US declarations to his safety & treatment The Judges are deliberating The problem is for how long? Justice for Julian

@Stella_Assange #FreeAssangeNOW

@Stella_Assange #FreeAssange!!!

@Snowden @Stella_Assange Regardless of the outcome of this case, no one should forget that Julian Assange is terrible person.

@Snowden @Stella_Assange Sending love and strength to you all @Stella_Assange ❤️

@FBuenAbad @Stella_Assange #FreeAssange #FreeAssangeNOW