正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨Stellar $XLM changed everything🚨 Franklin Templeton ran 50,000 transactions that cost $75,000 on legacy rails. On Stellar? $1.13. Read that again. Seventy-five thousand dollars down to one dollar That's not an upgrade That's a revolution in cost

253,400 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

62 条评论

Bobby Unlimited 的头像
Bobby Unlimited3 个月前

lets get some things clear for everyone here XLM (Stellar): It utilizes a 'Pathfinding' algorithm when executing cross-border transfers. For instance, if you want to send money from Japan to Mexico and the system cannot find a direct JPY-MXN pool, it searches for a chained conversion route like JPY -> USD -> XLM -> EUR -> MXN. While this architecture is excellent for retail and small-scale remittances or micro-payments, if you attempt to route billions of dollars in institutional cross-border settlements through these hop-by-hop pools, it creates massive slippage. The infrastructure simply lacks the capacity to absorb and contain that level of slippage. XRP (Ripple): It is purpose built directly as a "Bridge Asset" It aims to settle direct corridors between central banks and massive investment banks (e.g., USD/XRP/EUR) in a single step, backed by monumental liquidity depth. The "structural, vertical price appreciation necessity" that David Schwartz consistently emphasizes is precisely what allows XRP to absorb these massive institutional blocks in one piece without any slippage.

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Good breakdown. I actually think both can win because they're solving different problems.

XRP UNDERDOG Purveyor of XRP & LIFE related info 的头像
XRP UNDERDOG Purveyor of XRP & LIFE related info3 个月前

The real tell here is the fact that the fees on Stellar were "$1.13". The numbers 13 and 33 are their code. Pay attention to those numbers as they light the path of the future! XRP, XLM holders you were chosen to hold these assets.

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

The $1.13 is impressive enough on its own.

Scopuly - Stellar Wallet 的头像
Scopuly - Stellar Wallet3 个月前

infrastructure at work

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

And it's only getting started.

Bu11runner 的头像
Bu11runner3 个月前

That’s a huge difference

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

And that's only one use case.

MB 的头像
MB3 个月前

At this point, how is $XLM not over $2!?

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Very soon!

Asdera 的头像
Asdera3 个月前

and on $xpr its 0

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Lower costs and better rails benefit everyone.

Capetonian 的头像
Capetonian3 个月前

Crypto transactions are the only way forward for banking The old systems must fall.

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

The biggest shift is when banks start using the tech instead of fighting it.

CryptoChicken 的头像
CryptoChicken3 个月前

Good for companies, not good for token value for holders. 1 lumen needed for 100,000 transactions. Les than 1 $xlm to create a trustline. Companies wont need to hold much xlm

FICA 🧪 🐕🐻‍❄🙈🍌 的头像
FICA 🧪 🐕🐻‍❄🙈🍌3 个月前

I believe so too wanna get more xlm at this price xlm will surprise many 👀💎🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀💪💪💪💪 @thebu11runner

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

@thebu11runner Love seeing more people looking at utility instead of just price. That's where the real story is.

Laugesen (DK) 的头像
Laugesen (DK)3 个月前

now do XRP?

Valter 的头像
Valter3 个月前

Yep. But xlm fees are anemic. Not supporting token price

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Fair point. I think the bigger question is whether adoption eventually matters more than fees alone.

Kiese 的头像
Kiese3 个月前

Wen wundert es, das die Banken cryptogesetze bekämpfen😬

Vinh Nguyen 的头像
Vinh Nguyen3 个月前

That is crazy.

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

It really is. That's why I think most people still haven't wrapped their heads around the scale of this.

Crypto Outlook 的头像
Crypto Outlook3 个月前

This is a huge cost saving.

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

@InsideHedera Exactly. Saving money at that scale changes how institutions think about moving value.

XRP Spalding 的头像
XRP Spalding3 个月前

@CarlsDenni1191 💥 BOOM 💥

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

@CarlsDenni1191 The utility story is starting to get louder.

XRP Spalding 的头像
XRP Spalding3 个月前

@CarlsDenni1191 🤝

The Megalodon 的头像
The Megalodon3 个月前

On XRP 0.01

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

@thelookoutman_ Love seeing innovation push costs toward zero. Users win when networks keep raising the bar.

Manu 的头像
Manu3 个月前

Wowwww.. just $1.13?? That’s awesome!! 👏

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

And we're still early. Most people have no idea how much this could change finance.

Manu 的头像
Manu3 个月前

It’s complete revamp/ovethaul of the entire legacy financial system which does take time. This revolution would be worth the wait!! Millionaires/Billionaires would be made who are willing to wait. This would go down in the history books in the times to come!!

@realBD 的头像
@realBD3 个月前

And Stellar @StellarOrg #XLM is my 2nd largest holding after #XRP... and I hold a little of both. IYKYK....

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

@StellarOrg Holding both tells me you're paying attention to utility, not just narratives.

@realBD 的头像
@realBD3 个月前

@StellarOrg A lot of both I meant... lol

rurouni kenshin 的头像
rurouni kenshin3 个月前

Phenomenal!....those 3rd party agents "Game Over!"

David 的头像
David3 个月前

🔥

Jonathan Cantwell 的头像
Jonathan Cantwell3 个月前

@mitchellvii doesn’t believe in this 😂

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

@mitchellvii Time has a funny way of changing minds.

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Hard to unsee it once you see the numbers.

💎Crypto-King💎 的头像
💎Crypto-King💎1 个月前

And the price of XLM never moved once they are not using the token in the slightest context

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Plenty to unpack there

heyopatriot 的头像
heyopatriot3 个月前

the math isn't exactly correct lol, but still bullish for stellar:native

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

@realHeyoWhatUp The bigger point is what Stellar can do at scale.

Alpha Pot Brief 的头像
Alpha Pot Brief3 个月前

🙏🙏

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Appreciate that🤝

Densmore 的头像
Densmore3 个月前

How much liquidity is gonna come from implementation of this technology just through savings alone.

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

I think the savings are just the entry point. The real liquidity comes when institutions move assets that never made sense on legacy rails.

Densmore 的头像
Densmore3 个月前

Bring on the wave 🌊

KFR 的头像
KFR3 个月前

On XRP it would have cost .00069!

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Exactly. That's why I don't see XRP and XLM as enemies. The bigger story is what blockchain does to legacy finance.

i-man - Seek Flare and Ye shall find it! 的头像
i-man - Seek Flare and Ye shall find it!3 个月前

Around the 2:15 Sandy talks about her AHAAh moment... This is a type of example should should use to showcase its potential ... @Community_FIare

E Redd 的头像
E Redd1 个月前

How do these companies make money if the transaction fees are practically nothing?

Ed 的头像
Ed3 个月前

Waiting

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

The waiting room is getting crowded.

Ed 的头像
Ed3 个月前

Twist and turns

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Plenty of twists so far. I'm still here for the finale 👀

cexscan 的头像
cexscan3 个月前

That cost savings for Stellar is wild. We're seeing nearly flat price action over the last hour, but volume is picking up a bit with taker buys around 49%. Interesting to see if that efficiency translates to more market interest.

X Finance Bull 的头像
X Finance Bull3 个月前

Exactly. Going from $75k to basically $1 isn't just cheaper, it's a completely different game.

digital news 的头像
digital news3 个月前

So they don't need the price to be high

EducatusKatholikos 的头像
EducatusKatholikos3 个月前

@grok how many transactions does Franklin Templeton do a year like this?

相关视频

“All the money in the world running through Stellar.” Sleeping on $XLM? Not me. That came directly from Denelle Dixon, CEO and Executive Director of the Stellar Development Foundation. And what makes that statement hit differently in 2026 is what Stellar has already done before the year is even over. Stellar went from roughly: $1B in RWAs in January to $2B in April to $3B in June to $4B by early September. That is a 300% increase in roughly eight months. But I don't read Denelle's statement as: “every dollar in the world becomes XLM.” I read it as something much bigger. She wants Stellar underneath the movement of money itself. Look at what is already happening. Franklin Templeton has been running its U.S.-registered BENJI fund on Stellar since 2021. Around $654M sits on Stellar, and BENJI isn't just sitting there anymore. It can move peer-to-peer, distribute yield and has already been used as collateral. DTCC is preparing to connect DTC's Tokenization Service to Stellar in the first half of 2027, with U.S. Treasuries, major ETFs and Russell 1000 securities among the asset classes being evaluated. Then there is the actual money side. MoneyGram launched MGUSD natively on Stellar. USDT0 arrived September 2, connecting Stellar to a unified USDT liquidity pool exceeding $180B across more than 26 networks. Then on September 9, U.S. Bank completed its first cross-border pilot using its own USBDC stablecoin on Stellar between North America and Europe. Around the same period, Nuvanté tested Stellar-based stablecoin clearing through the Bank of England Synchronisation Lab. Now think about what Denelle said again. “All the money.” Treasuries. Funds. Private credit. Real estate. Bank-issued dollars. Stablecoins. Cross-border payments. Cash conversion through MoneyGram. That is starting to look less like one crypto ecosystem and more like different pieces of finance being connected through one network. And $XLM sits underneath Stellar itself. Transactions require XLM fees. Accounts require XLM reserves. Smart-contract resources use XLM. Traditional asset relationships can create additional reserve requirements. Then Stellar also has native exchange and path-payment infrastructure where XLM can participate as intermediate liquidity between assets. That gets more interesting as the number of assets explodes. A network with one stablecoin does not need much routing. A network containing government debt, BENJI, private credit, real estate, USDC, USDT0, MGUSD, USBDC and eventually DTCC-connected securities creates a completely different liquidity environment. And users don't even need to care about XLM. A MoneyGram customer sees dollars. A Franklin Templeton investor sees BENJI. A U.S. Bank client sees bank money. A DTCC participant sees securities. Stellar gets the activity underneath it. That is exactly why I am not sleeping on $XLM. Denelle Dixon isn't talking about making Stellar slightly bigger. She is talking about building infrastructure where money, assets and payments actually run through the network. And 2026 is already showing what the first few billion dollars of that vision look like.

X Finance Bull

37,678 次观看 • 19 天前