Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Stephen A. Smith says he will never be married because he couldn't be faithful and didn't know how to act Host: "If you know so much about marriage then why have you never been married?" Stephen: "Because I didn't know how to act" Host: "is it your fault?" Stephen:... "Totally my fault and It's not anybody's fault but mine...I was on the road over 200 days out of the year. I'm not going to be faithful being on the road 200 days out of the year" "This is the part that men don't reveal that much but I will do it is that when you get older you don't need it anymore so you don't chase. That's entirely different from when it's handed to you on a silver platter. It doesn't mean you can't say no. It means it's harder"show more

CreativeDude

5,989 subscribers

847,913 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 views • 8 months ago

You mean this interview on Wednesday’s ‘Good Morning America’ wasn’t enough to save Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of ‘The Bachelorette’ in light of video showing her beating her ex-boyfriend? Lara Spencer: “I want to hear all about your bachelorette journey. But first I want to give you the opportunity to respond to recent headlines about the alleged domestic violence incident with your ex-boyfriend. What do you want to share with us about this?” Paul: “Honestly, I — it's been a heavy time to see the headlines, especially during this time of The Bachelorette being released and it's supposed to be really exciting time. I'm a person that will always speak my truth and I'm — you know, that's what I'm known for. And so, when the time is right I will be. But right now, just trying to be in the present moment and focus on this and — but the thing is — is my — my kids do come first. My kids come first. And so, it's been, like, just a back and forth process trying to be here in the present moment, worrying about, you know, home and headlines. It's been stressful to be honest.” Spencer: “We did reach out to Dakota. And he did not — we did not — for a statement. We did not get a response from him. Now we have reports that ‘The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives’ has paused production on the next season. I know there's a season on right now and then season five was in production. Reports say it's been — it's paused. Is that true?” Paul: “Honestly I — I don't call the shots with production. So, as of now I have gotten word that it also has been paused, but I do not call those shots. So, as far as I know it — it was, but I don't know for how long and why.” Spencer: “And — and I know you're one of the executive producers on the show.” Paul: “Yeah, yeah. I got told that this — this year.” Spencer: “Oh, you didn't know that?” Paul: “I — I didn't. No. And I was like, what does that mean? You know, I was, like, like, I think just because we share our lives and we produce like our own, you know, lives.” Spencer: “Yeah. Paul: “But I don't know if that necessarily what that — what that means.” Spencer: “And how do you — how do you envision your future on that show?” Paul: “Hard to say now, right?” Spencer: “Right.” Paul: “Just because of, you know, everything going on. It's hard to see past this. I'm not going to lie. In this moment, it's just so heavy. And when your life is broadcasted out there in these headlines, it's, like, the end of the world.” Spencer: “Right.” Paul: “That's what it feels like. I'm not going to lie. But I will say I've, I've been here before and I got through it and, you know, shared my story, my life. So I — I'm hoping that I can do that again.” Spencer: “Yeah.”

You mean this interview on Wednesday’s ‘Good Morning America’ wasn’t enough to save Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of ‘The Bachelorette’ in light of video showing her beating her ex-boyfriend? Lara Spencer: “I want to hear all about your bachelorette journey. But first I want to give you the opportunity to respond to recent headlines about the alleged domestic violence incident with your ex-boyfriend. What do you want to share with us about this?” Paul: “Honestly, I — it's been a heavy time to see the headlines, especially during this time of The Bachelorette being released and it's supposed to be really exciting time. I'm a person that will always speak my truth and I'm — you know, that's what I'm known for. And so, when the time is right I will be. But right now, just trying to be in the present moment and focus on this and — but the thing is — is my — my kids do come first. My kids come first. And so, it's been, like, just a back and forth process trying to be here in the present moment, worrying about, you know, home and headlines. It's been stressful to be honest.” Spencer: “We did reach out to Dakota. And he did not — we did not — for a statement. We did not get a response from him. Now we have reports that ‘The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives’ has paused production on the next season. I know there's a season on right now and then season five was in production. Reports say it's been — it's paused. Is that true?” Paul: “Honestly I — I don't call the shots with production. So, as of now I have gotten word that it also has been paused, but I do not call those shots. So, as far as I know it — it was, but I don't know for how long and why.” Spencer: “And — and I know you're one of the executive producers on the show.” Paul: “Yeah, yeah. I got told that this — this year.” Spencer: “Oh, you didn't know that?” Paul: “I — I didn't. No. And I was like, what does that mean? You know, I was, like, like, I think just because we share our lives and we produce like our own, you know, lives.” Spencer: “Yeah. Paul: “But I don't know if that necessarily what that — what that means.” Spencer: “And how do you — how do you envision your future on that show?” Paul: “Hard to say now, right?” Spencer: “Right.” Paul: “Just because of, you know, everything going on. It's hard to see past this. I'm not going to lie. In this moment, it's just so heavy. And when your life is broadcasted out there in these headlines, it's, like, the end of the world.” Spencer: “Right.” Paul: “That's what it feels like. I'm not going to lie. But I will say I've, I've been here before and I got through it and, you know, shared my story, my life. So I — I'm hoping that I can do that again.” Spencer: “Yeah.”

Curtis Houck

1,083,669 views • 5 months ago

VIDEO | When asked about what youngsters misunderstand about growing old as the celebrated author is soon going to be 92, Ruskin Bond says, "Look, it can't be helped. When we're young, from the age of five to the age of 15 or 25, we don't know what it is to grow old. So how can we have an deep understanding of it, hmm? I guess it's only when we grow old that we, realise the advantages and disadvantages. And to tell you the truth, I don't mind being old, because I'm still working, I'm still writing, apart from the fact that, I have to stop walking again. And that I'm not seeing well enough to write. But now I dictate my stories. So, but old age has its compensations too. You have your memories. You can appreciate the world around you even more because you know you've only got it for a short time. So time is limited. So you must make the use of it. You know, and one does. So, it's not that young people don't understand the old. It's just that they don't have any experience of being old. And that will come much later." #RuskinBond

VIDEO | When asked about what youngsters misunderstand about growing old as the celebrated author is soon going to be 92, Ruskin Bond says, "Look, it can't be helped. When we're young, from the age of five to the age of 15 or 25, we don't know what it is to grow old. So how can we have an deep understanding of it, hmm? I guess it's only when we grow old that we, realise the advantages and disadvantages. And to tell you the truth, I don't mind being old, because I'm still working, I'm still writing, apart from the fact that, I have to stop walking again. And that I'm not seeing well enough to write. But now I dictate my stories. So, but old age has its compensations too. You have your memories. You can appreciate the world around you even more because you know you've only got it for a short time. So time is limited. So you must make the use of it. You know, and one does. So, it's not that young people don't understand the old. It's just that they don't have any experience of being old. And that will come much later." #RuskinBond

Press Trust of India

30,709 views • 3 months ago

Max Homa says he doesn’t agree with the ruling on Bryson DeChambeau yesterday and says he knows Bryson would “never cheat the game of golf”: “I'm not really, I guess, wanting to be able to decide on fair, because they're the rules officials. I only saw one angle, and in my opinion I didn't agree with the ruling. I know there's another angle that -- side on, it's always hard to tell if it improves anything. “All I know is I've known Bryson for a very long time, and he's an interesting human at times, but I know he would never cheat the game of golf. I don't really love how it happened. It's not that the R&A said that he did it intentionally, but that rule as a professional golfer feels like it's written inherently to protect against people trying to improve their lie. So I just hope that people don't have that -- that doesn't create a narrative because I don't believe that of him. “But again, I'm not going to sit here -- it's really hard to tell anything. So yeah, that one is not up for me to judge. But it's a shame how that ruling feels because it seems like -- we were talking about it this morning. It's like you would try to call somebody out in junior golf because you could tell they were stomping around the ball. It didn't look like that to me. But that's not up to me. I just don't think that's in his character, so it's a shame I think that's kind of how it's being portrayed to some.” The Open

Max Homa says he doesn’t agree with the ruling on Bryson DeChambeau yesterday and says he knows Bryson would “never cheat the game of golf”: “I'm not really, I guess, wanting to be able to decide on fair, because they're the rules officials. I only saw one angle, and in my opinion I didn't agree with the ruling. I know there's another angle that -- side on, it's always hard to tell if it improves anything. “All I know is I've known Bryson for a very long time, and he's an interesting human at times, but I know he would never cheat the game of golf. I don't really love how it happened. It's not that the R&A said that he did it intentionally, but that rule as a professional golfer feels like it's written inherently to protect against people trying to improve their lie. So I just hope that people don't have that -- that doesn't create a narrative because I don't believe that of him. “But again, I'm not going to sit here -- it's really hard to tell anything. So yeah, that one is not up for me to judge. But it's a shame how that ruling feels because it seems like -- we were talking about it this morning. It's like you would try to call somebody out in junior golf because you could tell they were stomping around the ball. It didn't look like that to me. But that's not up to me. I just don't think that's in his character, so it's a shame I think that's kind of how it's being portrayed to some.” The Open

Flushing It

2,329,623 views • 1 month ago

A man worth $2 million refuses to get married without a prenup. His girlfriend says it makes her feel like he’s already planning for divorce. Now they’re questioning whether they should get married at all. Caller: My boyfriend and I have been dating for about a year, so we're speaking about marriage. And he had mentioned that he would never get married without a prenup. I've always been against the idea of a prenup. I do understand the logic behind them, and he's worth a lot more than I am financially. So, I just feel like if a man says that he won't get married without a prenup, it makes me feel like it's an unsafe marriage for me to enter into because he's planning for divorce basically or preparing for it if that makes sense. Host: Have you shared that with him? those exact words Caller: Yes Host: How did he respond? Caller: Well, he said that he feels like I'm being ungrateful because he would be willing to, you know, take on me and my two children and I shouldn't question him. Host: So, this is an act of charity for him and you shouldn’t ask for no more. He's already doing the most by letting you into his life. Caller: Well, i was pretty surprised when he said that and it was a little upsetting. I understand that money is important obviously but there are things that I value more than money. And there's no amount of money that would be worth a divorce to me or like dragging my children through a failed marriage and all of that. Host: Is this second marriage for both of you or one of you? Caller: It's a second marriage for me, And this is his first marriage. He's never been married. He has no children. Host: So how much more is he worth than you? Caller: I don't know exactly. The number that he gave me was two million. like between retirement and assets, savings, all of that. He says it wouldn't be fair if we were to get divorced. It wouldn't be fair for me to get half of everything he's worked for. And I understand the And I'm not saying I want half of everything. I'm saying i don't want to go into this marriage talking about divorce because I'm 36 years old and if I'm going to be getting divorced in 5 years, I'd rather not get married. Host: I think you guys are just missing each other communication wise and he has his reasons and you have your reasons and neither of you are getting to the root of it and understanding each other. Co-Host: it’s not necessarily wrong, for in his sake. I'm not going to say that he is wrong. But where I do think he's wrong and what what I get the ick about is the way he's responding to you in it and it makes you feel like he's valuing his money over you and that's how it feels.

A man worth $2 million refuses to get married without a prenup. His girlfriend says it makes her feel like he’s already planning for divorce. Now they’re questioning whether they should get married at all. Caller: My boyfriend and I have been dating for about a year, so we're speaking about marriage. And he had mentioned that he would never get married without a prenup. I've always been against the idea of a prenup. I do understand the logic behind them, and he's worth a lot more than I am financially. So, I just feel like if a man says that he won't get married without a prenup, it makes me feel like it's an unsafe marriage for me to enter into because he's planning for divorce basically or preparing for it if that makes sense. Host: Have you shared that with him? those exact words Caller: Yes Host: How did he respond? Caller: Well, he said that he feels like I'm being ungrateful because he would be willing to, you know, take on me and my two children and I shouldn't question him. Host: So, this is an act of charity for him and you shouldn’t ask for no more. He's already doing the most by letting you into his life. Caller: Well, i was pretty surprised when he said that and it was a little upsetting. I understand that money is important obviously but there are things that I value more than money. And there's no amount of money that would be worth a divorce to me or like dragging my children through a failed marriage and all of that. Host: Is this second marriage for both of you or one of you? Caller: It's a second marriage for me, And this is his first marriage. He's never been married. He has no children. Host: So how much more is he worth than you? Caller: I don't know exactly. The number that he gave me was two million. like between retirement and assets, savings, all of that. He says it wouldn't be fair if we were to get divorced. It wouldn't be fair for me to get half of everything he's worked for. And I understand the And I'm not saying I want half of everything. I'm saying i don't want to go into this marriage talking about divorce because I'm 36 years old and if I'm going to be getting divorced in 5 years, I'd rather not get married. Host: I think you guys are just missing each other communication wise and he has his reasons and you have your reasons and neither of you are getting to the root of it and understanding each other. Co-Host: it’s not necessarily wrong, for in his sake. I'm not going to say that he is wrong. But where I do think he's wrong and what what I get the ick about is the way he's responding to you in it and it makes you feel like he's valuing his money over you and that's how it feels.

Paris 🗼

13,126 views • 28 days ago

Max on the online discourse around Lando: "I don't know why everyone's so doom and gloom about Lando and stuff. I don't get it man." "He himself is feeling not as comfortable with the car and whatever, whatever else is going on. And he's still on the podium and still leading the championship." "He's not put a bad results in. [I] just don't know why there's so much noise, all this and that, I don't get it. Bloke's leading the championship, he's been on the podium every race. And he hasn't been 100% himself in my opinion, there's a lot more in there and in the tank to go for the rest of the year." "There's so much hate? I mean, I feel like we saw- there was so much hate on Vettel when he started to do well, so much hate on Max when he started to do well, this is just sports bro." "I mean, a lot of it's just forced and you can't take notice of it. People do it just to entertain themselves and whatever it may be. The world carries on. [...] But you go into the paddock, be around the whole racing community, he's very loved in the paddock. It's not even a thing. It's not real life that, whatever you guys see [online], it's not real."

Max on the online discourse around Lando: "I don't know why everyone's so doom and gloom about Lando and stuff. I don't get it man." "He himself is feeling not as comfortable with the car and whatever, whatever else is going on. And he's still on the podium and still leading the championship." "He's not put a bad results in. [I] just don't know why there's so much noise, all this and that, I don't get it. Bloke's leading the championship, he's been on the podium every race. And he hasn't been 100% himself in my opinion, there's a lot more in there and in the tank to go for the rest of the year." "There's so much hate? I mean, I feel like we saw- there was so much hate on Vettel when he started to do well, so much hate on Max when he started to do well, this is just sports bro." "I mean, a lot of it's just forced and you can't take notice of it. People do it just to entertain themselves and whatever it may be. The world carries on. [...] But you go into the paddock, be around the whole racing community, he's very loved in the paddock. It's not even a thing. It's not real life that, whatever you guys see [online], it's not real."

Max Fewtrell Daily

149,440 views • 1 year ago

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 fking percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 fking percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."

Joe Murgia

763,279 views • 1 year ago

Bryan Cranston said America can't truly heal from slavery unless people are willing to acknowledge the country's role in it. Bryan Cranston: The first, the first step is to, is to acknowledge. Rainn Wilson: Acknowledge, yeah. Bryan Cranston: You know, whether, how far that... Rainn Wilson: So what do you say to a white guy who's like, "Well, it's not my fault. I didn't have slaves"? Bryan Cranston: But white people did, and it's our country. And that's the thing. You have to, if you take pride in your country, you can't look at your country as, as the greatest ever when it has this severe bruise on it. And will always wear that scar. And that scar will never heal unless we start to say, "Wow, what did we do?" Rainn Wilson: Can you imagine the comments that are happening, popping up right now as people are listening to this conversation? Bryan Cranston: I don't know, I don't... I don't read them.

Bryan Cranston said America can't truly heal from slavery unless people are willing to acknowledge the country's role in it. Bryan Cranston: The first, the first step is to, is to acknowledge. Rainn Wilson: Acknowledge, yeah. Bryan Cranston: You know, whether, how far that... Rainn Wilson: So what do you say to a white guy who's like, "Well, it's not my fault. I didn't have slaves"? Bryan Cranston: But white people did, and it's our country. And that's the thing. You have to, if you take pride in your country, you can't look at your country as, as the greatest ever when it has this severe bruise on it. And will always wear that scar. And that scar will never heal unless we start to say, "Wow, what did we do?" Rainn Wilson: Can you imagine the comments that are happening, popping up right now as people are listening to this conversation? Bryan Cranston: I don't know, I don't... I don't read them.

Mue Deborah

18,693 views • 2 months ago

Stephen Curry says even he couldn't beat LeBron James in the Olympic "I'd heard about the work ethic and the sheer volume of time and how he takes care of his body...but when you see somebody at that level couldn't beat him to the gym" "there was an energy like we all know this this is the stuff that makes you who you are on the court that's going to prepare you for the moments when the lights are bright" "I learned that you know early in the process to know like don't take that for granted so that you can be your best self and it's like there's no accident when it comes to this"

Stephen Curry says even he couldn't beat LeBron James in the Olympic "I'd heard about the work ethic and the sheer volume of time and how he takes care of his body...but when you see somebody at that level couldn't beat him to the gym" "there was an energy like we all know this this is the stuff that makes you who you are on the court that's going to prepare you for the moments when the lights are bright" "I learned that you know early in the process to know like don't take that for granted so that you can be your best self and it's like there's no accident when it comes to this"

CreativeDude

236,213 views • 2 months ago

Grusch on Rogan, re: Live Beings... "there was some details provided to me but it's like, it's secondary and I don't know if that's like, the telephone game and I don't know if it was hyperbolized." (What's changed since the Rogan interview? Rogan interview was 2023 and my post/transcript below was July 9th of this year. H/T: Lisa A Cariaggi for reminding me.) Rogan: "Are there discussions of interactions with live beings?" Grusch: "Uhh, there was some water-cooler talk about that kind of thing." Rogan: "But that's it?" Grusch: "But, you know, I don't even wanna get into it because it's like, uh, there was some details provided to me but it's like, it's secondary and I don't know if that's like, the telephone game and I don't know if it was hyperbolized in any way...um, you know, in the break room, so to speak. So I just... I'm so anal about making sure what I say is accurate...I don't, you know, I don't know." (Based on what he said there, it seems like he has NOT seen any evidence of live beings. If he now comes out and says that he has, it will seem like a flip flop.) [End my July-post excerpt.]

Grusch on Rogan, re: Live Beings... "there was some details provided to me but it's like, it's secondary and I don't know if that's like, the telephone game and I don't know if it was hyperbolized." (What's changed since the Rogan interview? Rogan interview was 2023 and my post/transcript below was July 9th of this year. H/T: Lisa A Cariaggi for reminding me.) Rogan: "Are there discussions of interactions with live beings?" Grusch: "Uhh, there was some water-cooler talk about that kind of thing." Rogan: "But that's it?" Grusch: "But, you know, I don't even wanna get into it because it's like, uh, there was some details provided to me but it's like, it's secondary and I don't know if that's like, the telephone game and I don't know if it was hyperbolized in any way...um, you know, in the break room, so to speak. So I just... I'm so anal about making sure what I say is accurate...I don't, you know, I don't know." (Based on what he said there, it seems like he has NOT seen any evidence of live beings. If he now comes out and says that he has, it will seem like a flip flop.) [End my July-post excerpt.]

Joe Murgia

23,727 views • 20 days ago

Ethan Evans (ex-Amazon VP) on his Director promo: "So I said, my career is very important to me. I need to understand how important it is to Amazon because if it's not as important to Amazon as it is to me, I need to think about that. And you know, I need to think about that isn't a direct threat. But you laughed. Everyone understands. But I'm not doing it in a way that is easily easy for him to push back on. See, if I say, well, if it's not as important to you, making it personal with him, if it's not important to you as it is to me, then I might quit. That's a threat. And all managers are going to be like, hey, you can't extort me, right? That isn't how it works right? He pushed the promotion through." Ethan Evans Ryan: "When you say that wording, I feel the effects of extortion a bit, right? But I couldn't, I could not label it extortion."

Ethan Evans (ex-Amazon VP) on his Director promo: "So I said, my career is very important to me. I need to understand how important it is to Amazon because if it's not as important to Amazon as it is to me, I need to think about that. And you know, I need to think about that isn't a direct threat. But you laughed. Everyone understands. But I'm not doing it in a way that is easily easy for him to push back on. See, if I say, well, if it's not as important to you, making it personal with him, if it's not important to you as it is to me, then I might quit. That's a threat. And all managers are going to be like, hey, you can't extort me, right? That isn't how it works right? He pushed the promotion through." Ethan Evans Ryan: "When you say that wording, I feel the effects of extortion a bit, right? But I couldn't, I could not label it extortion."

Ryan Peterman

106,328 views • 4 months ago

US President Trump's first official comments om Russian claims about the alleged Ukrainian drone attack on Putin's residence. US PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yeah, I don't I don't like it. It's not good. I heard about it this morning. You know who told me about it? President Putin told me about it early in the morning. He said he was attacked. It's not good. It's not good. Don't forget, you know, the Tomahawks, I stopped the Tomahawks, I didn't want that... You know, it's a delicate period of time. This is not the right time. It's one thing to be offensive, because they are offensive. It's another thing to attack his house, it's not the right time to do any of that... And I learned about it from President Putin and he was very angry about it. REPORTER: Don't you have U.S. intelligence services that monitor that region very closely? Is there any evidence? US PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, it came out. It came out. Well, we'll find out. I mean, you're saying maybe the attack didn't take place. It's possible too, I guess. But President Putin told me this morning.

US President Trump's first official comments om Russian claims about the alleged Ukrainian drone attack on Putin's residence. US PRESIDENT TRUMP: Yeah, I don't I don't like it. It's not good. I heard about it this morning. You know who told me about it? President Putin told me about it early in the morning. He said he was attacked. It's not good. It's not good. Don't forget, you know, the Tomahawks, I stopped the Tomahawks, I didn't want that... You know, it's a delicate period of time. This is not the right time. It's one thing to be offensive, because they are offensive. It's another thing to attack his house, it's not the right time to do any of that... And I learned about it from President Putin and he was very angry about it. REPORTER: Don't you have U.S. intelligence services that monitor that region very closely? Is there any evidence? US PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, it came out. It came out. Well, we'll find out. I mean, you're saying maybe the attack didn't take place. It's possible too, I guess. But President Putin told me this morning.

Status-6 (War & Military News)

55,472 views • 8 months ago

Trevor Wallace and Michael Blaustein reveal the harsh reality of being single men "When you're single it's just like so, you don't really know when. It's just like earthquakes. You're like, is it happening right now? What do we do?" "I'm about to fuck that plunger hanging on the wall. Things are up down bad" "I do, but it's with a fleshlight" "we don't yield that type of influence as a dude. You can't just make a choice" "I don't think anybody would feel good about it. Everyone would come and be like, I need to go back to my Toyota Sienna and get the hell out of here" "if you kind of pull like the comedian 'you follow me' type card, then that can become a little weird" "So you don't fuck fans? I have, but I try not to"

Trevor Wallace and Michael Blaustein reveal the harsh reality of being single men "When you're single it's just like so, you don't really know when. It's just like earthquakes. You're like, is it happening right now? What do we do?" "I'm about to fuck that plunger hanging on the wall. Things are up down bad" "I do, but it's with a fleshlight" "we don't yield that type of influence as a dude. You can't just make a choice" "I don't think anybody would feel good about it. Everyone would come and be like, I need to go back to my Toyota Sienna and get the hell out of here" "if you kind of pull like the comedian 'you follow me' type card, then that can become a little weird" "So you don't fuck fans? I have, but I try not to"

Deborah

16,417 views • 3 days ago

Stephen Colbert is the epitome of a Class Act. I don't know why you say goodbye, The Late Show is gone but the Hope it & he gives us carries on…to that I say hello, hello, hello ❤️

Stephen Colbert is the epitome of a Class Act. I don't know why you say goodbye, The Late Show is gone but the Hope it & he gives us carries on…to that I say hello, hello, hello ❤️

Sarrah Bellus

35,119 views • 3 months ago

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

neandrewthal

74,654 views • 1 year ago

DEEP THOUGHTS from Scott Adams and Naval on Singularity Theory and the nature of consciousness. Naval: I try not to go too much in the supernatural, but I'll be honest, there are times when I've prayed. (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) Scott: Can't hurt! Naval: Nobody's perfect! Yeah, exactly. Pascal's wager, right? Just in case! Scott: Yeah, I've got a version of this. I don't know if I've ever said this out loud before, but every now and then I just talk to the creators of The Simulation that are watching me -- because it might be me . . . . Naval: Yeah, exactly! No, I completely agree. Yes, if simulation hypothesis is true, then, you know, God or creator or master programmer has your best interest at heart. Scott: I say things like, you know: "Is this the plan? I mean, are you really going to do this thing?" Naval: Exactly. Exactly. No, yeah. Like, “don't take me out of the game too fast.” Like, “you need some resource if you want me to be effective, right?” Or like, “I'm not Job. Don't try me. I'll fail.” (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) “Let's not go through. Let's not take that route. Let's try a different one.” Yeah, I think everybody does that. Because at the end of the day, existence itself is an unexplained miracle! Like how did we get here? Why am I here? Why am I a monkey? Why am I three dimensional? Why am I male? Why am I talking to you right now? What does it even mean to talk, right? The whole thing is so surreal that there is an instantaneous and overarching miracle of just consciousness. Like why even be conscious? Why not just be like zombies or robots talking to each other, going through the same actions? Why even be aware? So, there's so much here that you just have to take axiomatically -- and that is spirituality. And I think your spirituality, your current religion, is a Simulation Hypothesis. It's perfectly valid, you know. Mine is probably closer to the Tao and, you know, other people's Christianity or whatever, but somehow, you have to explain this miracle of existence. And everyone has to do it in their own frame. But the rest is science, right? The rest is all -- follows the rules of science. And so, what I don't like is when like someone says: “This one, I'm correct, it's scientific, you should believe it because of these following arguments.” And then I'm like: “Okay, well, what are the implications? How do we test it?” If you want me to believe in the real world, it has to be scientific, which means it has to be testable. There's a third category that I will accept, which is direct experience, but it's only valid for you. So, if you have a direct experience of something, you can hold it, but your ability to convey it is zero, because everybody has their own experience and you can't take anybody else's experience at value. Scott: I'll give you that. I'm gonna give you that my personal experience is so bizarre that -- I mean, it's not, I don't think it's quite Elon Musk level, but I mean, you've got your own life that's kind of, doesn't match. Naval: Yeah, very surreal. Yeah. Scott: I mean, how do the three of us exist? Is this really – like, there's so many things in my life that happened, and I'm sure you have the same feeling, where you just say, how is this real? I mean, just how is this real? Naval: If you want to talk absolute truth, and nothing else, the only statement that you can make that is absolutely true is that – what’s that? Go ahead. Scott: I know where this is going. Naval: Sorry. What's yours? Scott: It's that we exist. To ask the question. That's the only thing you know. Naval: It's actually even worse than that! (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) I used to say it was I exist and then a very smart friend of mine corrected me and he said, no, awareness exists. You don't even know that you exist. Your thought, like yes, your current thought exists and you're aware of that current thought, but what is the you that is having that thought? That's the whole Buddhist question, the whole enlightenment question. Is there a persistent self-identity other than just thoughts that are referring to each other? Like when you look for yourself, you're not actually there. There's an awareness. The awareness exists, but the you separate from that awareness, does that even exist? Full transcript of podcast (excerpt begins at 54:33): Full video:

DEEP THOUGHTS from Scott Adams and Naval on Singularity Theory and the nature of consciousness. Naval: I try not to go too much in the supernatural, but I'll be honest, there are times when I've prayed. (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) Scott: Can't hurt! Naval: Nobody's perfect! Yeah, exactly. Pascal's wager, right? Just in case! Scott: Yeah, I've got a version of this. I don't know if I've ever said this out loud before, but every now and then I just talk to the creators of The Simulation that are watching me -- because it might be me . . . . Naval: Yeah, exactly! No, I completely agree. Yes, if simulation hypothesis is true, then, you know, God or creator or master programmer has your best interest at heart. Scott: I say things like, you know: "Is this the plan? I mean, are you really going to do this thing?" Naval: Exactly. Exactly. No, yeah. Like, “don't take me out of the game too fast.” Like, “you need some resource if you want me to be effective, right?” Or like, “I'm not Job. Don't try me. I'll fail.” (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) “Let's not go through. Let's not take that route. Let's try a different one.” Yeah, I think everybody does that. Because at the end of the day, existence itself is an unexplained miracle! Like how did we get here? Why am I here? Why am I a monkey? Why am I three dimensional? Why am I male? Why am I talking to you right now? What does it even mean to talk, right? The whole thing is so surreal that there is an instantaneous and overarching miracle of just consciousness. Like why even be conscious? Why not just be like zombies or robots talking to each other, going through the same actions? Why even be aware? So, there's so much here that you just have to take axiomatically -- and that is spirituality. And I think your spirituality, your current religion, is a Simulation Hypothesis. It's perfectly valid, you know. Mine is probably closer to the Tao and, you know, other people's Christianity or whatever, but somehow, you have to explain this miracle of existence. And everyone has to do it in their own frame. But the rest is science, right? The rest is all -- follows the rules of science. And so, what I don't like is when like someone says: “This one, I'm correct, it's scientific, you should believe it because of these following arguments.” And then I'm like: “Okay, well, what are the implications? How do we test it?” If you want me to believe in the real world, it has to be scientific, which means it has to be testable. There's a third category that I will accept, which is direct experience, but it's only valid for you. So, if you have a direct experience of something, you can hold it, but your ability to convey it is zero, because everybody has their own experience and you can't take anybody else's experience at value. Scott: I'll give you that. I'm gonna give you that my personal experience is so bizarre that -- I mean, it's not, I don't think it's quite Elon Musk level, but I mean, you've got your own life that's kind of, doesn't match. Naval: Yeah, very surreal. Yeah. Scott: I mean, how do the three of us exist? Is this really – like, there's so many things in my life that happened, and I'm sure you have the same feeling, where you just say, how is this real? I mean, just how is this real? Naval: If you want to talk absolute truth, and nothing else, the only statement that you can make that is absolutely true is that – what’s that? Go ahead. Scott: I know where this is going. Naval: Sorry. What's yours? Scott: It's that we exist. To ask the question. That's the only thing you know. Naval: It's actually even worse than that! (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) I used to say it was I exist and then a very smart friend of mine corrected me and he said, no, awareness exists. You don't even know that you exist. Your thought, like yes, your current thought exists and you're aware of that current thought, but what is the you that is having that thought? That's the whole Buddhist question, the whole enlightenment question. Is there a persistent self-identity other than just thoughts that are referring to each other? Like when you look for yourself, you're not actually there. There's an awareness. The awareness exists, but the you separate from that awareness, does that even exist? Full transcript of podcast (excerpt begins at 54:33): Full video:

ScottAdamsVids

104,969 views • 1 year ago

Host: I do want to ask you about Trump's remarks about Rob Reiner, because you were asked it but you didn't answer. Johnson: Well, I did comment at length, they just didn't replay that part. But our prayers are with the Reiner family. Host: You can praise Trump about many things and you can condemn his comments about certain things. Johnson: I'm asked to give running commentary on everything that Trump says every 5 minutes of the day. It's not the way I would have done it. That's my comment on it. I don't know what else I can say.

Host: I do want to ask you about Trump's remarks about Rob Reiner, because you were asked it but you didn't answer. Johnson: Well, I did comment at length, they just didn't replay that part. But our prayers are with the Reiner family. Host: You can praise Trump about many things and you can condemn his comments about certain things. Johnson: I'm asked to give running commentary on everything that Trump says every 5 minutes of the day. It's not the way I would have done it. That's my comment on it. I don't know what else I can say.

FactPost

552,719 views • 8 months ago

mingyu vs. carats when he thought he spoiled dino's mv teaser coming out by 12am 😭 🐶 it's been 30 mins since i turned on the live and there'll be something at 12am to be released, right? so i have to slowly wrap up this live 🐶 huh you don't know what's coming out by 12? you have no idea...? it's not related to me but another member. there's something coming out later by 12 so i hope you enjoy watching that 🐶 you know it right? you don't? who spoiled it? did i spoil it? you know right? see, you know it, why are you like this! it's dino 🐶 i didn't! i said i didn't spoil it! you said you knew! we even talked about his fan con why are you being like this to me!

mingyu vs. carats when he thought he spoiled dino's mv teaser coming out by 12am 😭 🐶 it's been 30 mins since i turned on the live and there'll be something at 12am to be released, right? so i have to slowly wrap up this live 🐶 huh you don't know what's coming out by 12? you have no idea...? it's not related to me but another member. there's something coming out later by 12 so i hope you enjoy watching that 🐶 you know it right? you don't? who spoiled it? did i spoil it? you know right? see, you know it, why are you like this! it's dino 🐶 i didn't! i said i didn't spoil it! you said you knew! we even talked about his fan con why are you being like this to me!

🐶

79,395 views • 1 month ago