正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Stephen A. Smith to Democrats: “SHUT THE HELL UP” about defending democracy. “I don’t want to hear [about Democracy]. Because you didn’t care about that when you CIRCUMVENTED the democratic process to make sure that [Kamala Harris] would be able to bypass the Democratic primary and go straight to...

VigilantFox's profile picture

Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,948,837 subscribers

448,038 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育喜剧
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith tells Democrats to "SHUT THE H*LL UP" over "THREAT TO DEMOCRACY" rhetoric🚨 "I don't want to hear that! Because you didn't care about that when you circumvented the democratic process to make sure that the vice president, the former vice president, would be able to bypass a Democratic primary and go straight to the Democratic nominee for the presidency of the United States!" Daily Caller
1:29

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith tells Democrats to "SHUT THE H*LL UP" over "THREAT TO DEMOCRACY" rhetoric🚨 "I don't want to hear that! Because you didn't care about that when you circumvented the democratic process to make sure that the vice president, the former vice president, would be able to bypass a Democratic primary and go straight to the Democratic nominee for the presidency of the United States!" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

56,595 次观看 • 10 个月前

Stephen A. Smith has tough words for Kamala Harris as she crawls out of hiding to try to sell her book. “I think her political career is OVER… I think she’s DOOMED.” Smith delivered two minutes of truth bombs. He once supported Harris, but this was a blistering rebuke: He called it disgraceful that Harris now has the audacity to publish a book after showing no leadership during the election, revealing private conversations, and losing the popular vote for the first time since 2004. He then dropped an inconvenient truth: all her support was MANUFACTURED. “She didn’t have as much Democratic support as she would have wanted to begin with. It was all manufactured in the end, once she was the Democratic nominee. It wasn’t about you. It was about people who didn’t want Trump to be president. It wasn’t about you. “And people weren’t enamored with you… because if that’s the case, you would have made it to Iowa in 2020. You would have been able to endure a primary prior to the election, but you BYPASSED all of that. They clearly did it PURPOSEFULLY because they didn’t want her to have to compete for the Democratic nomination.” If there was ever a moment Stephen A. Smith got all his facts straight, this was it. He cooked Kamala Harris for dinner here.
2:24

Stephen A. Smith has tough words for Kamala Harris as she crawls out of hiding to try to sell her book. “I think her political career is OVER… I think she’s DOOMED.” Smith delivered two minutes of truth bombs. He once supported Harris, but this was a blistering rebuke: He called it disgraceful that Harris now has the audacity to publish a book after showing no leadership during the election, revealing private conversations, and losing the popular vote for the first time since 2004. He then dropped an inconvenient truth: all her support was MANUFACTURED. “She didn’t have as much Democratic support as she would have wanted to begin with. It was all manufactured in the end, once she was the Democratic nominee. It wasn’t about you. It was about people who didn’t want Trump to be president. It wasn’t about you. “And people weren’t enamored with you… because if that’s the case, you would have made it to Iowa in 2020. You would have been able to endure a primary prior to the election, but you BYPASSED all of that. They clearly did it PURPOSEFULLY because they didn’t want her to have to compete for the Democratic nomination.” If there was ever a moment Stephen A. Smith got all his facts straight, this was it. He cooked Kamala Harris for dinner here.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

116,781 次观看 • 10 个月前

Stephen A. Smith tells an important truth: Democratic Party leadership shoves shitty presidential nominees down voters' throats because they hate primaries. SMITH: "Y'all are too busy trying to pick candidates for the American people instead of listening to the American people tell you who they want. The last Democrat that the American people told you they wanted was Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton, it's her turn. Bernie Sanders had momentum — but it's Hillary's turn. Joe Biden captured momentum because representative Clyburn got involved in South Carolina, saved his behind, but it's really, really his turn. Okay. He has no business running for reelection, but everybody went for it. Knowing he was supposed to be transitioning. He's going to be 81 years of age. Then you sit up there. He doesn't have a primary. Then he goes on the debate stage, embarrasses himself. Then y'all still let him take three damn weeks to walk away instead of getting the hell out there immediately. So you can see if there's somebody other than Kamala Harris who could be the democratic nominee. Then she gets the nomination and everybody wants to act like she's the rock star. All of y'all wanted all along. Oh my God, let's throw up our hands and just to say, Hey, she is the one when you know, good and damn well, that wasn't the truth.
0:59

Stephen A. Smith tells an important truth: Democratic Party leadership shoves shitty presidential nominees down voters' throats because they hate primaries. SMITH: "Y'all are too busy trying to pick candidates for the American people instead of listening to the American people tell you who they want. The last Democrat that the American people told you they wanted was Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton, it's her turn. Bernie Sanders had momentum — but it's Hillary's turn. Joe Biden captured momentum because representative Clyburn got involved in South Carolina, saved his behind, but it's really, really his turn. Okay. He has no business running for reelection, but everybody went for it. Knowing he was supposed to be transitioning. He's going to be 81 years of age. Then you sit up there. He doesn't have a primary. Then he goes on the debate stage, embarrasses himself. Then y'all still let him take three damn weeks to walk away instead of getting the hell out there immediately. So you can see if there's somebody other than Kamala Harris who could be the democratic nominee. Then she gets the nomination and everybody wants to act like she's the rock star. All of y'all wanted all along. Oh my God, let's throw up our hands and just to say, Hey, she is the one when you know, good and damn well, that wasn't the truth.

Ken Klippenstein

1,227,346 次观看 • 1 年前

Joe Biden has just announced he’s not running for re-election and will support Vice President Kamala Harris’s candidacy instead. The announcement came as a shock to the people who work at the White House and to campaign aides, one of whom told Politico, "We’re all finding out by tweet. None of us understand what’s happening.” The same was true in Delaware, Biden’s home state. “I don’t think a soul in Delaware knew,” said a Biden campaign official. As such, this is the third time in three presidential elections that Democratic Party elites have subverted democracy to choose a presidential candidate. The first time this occurred was in 2016 when the Democratic National Committee manipulated money and process to help Hillary Clinton defeat Bernie Sanders. The second time was in 2020, when Party elites pushed out Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar so Elizabeth Warren could split the progressive vote with Sanders, creating a path to victory for Biden. This year, Biden and the DNC prevented a competitive open primary, and now Biden is deciding who will be the nominee for Democrats. Harris was deeply unpopular with Democratic voters when she ran in the 2020 primary, leading her to drop out after her polling plummeted to the single digits. It’s true that the Democratic elites followed the formal rules, most Democrats agreed that Biden should not run again, and a Democrat could still challenge Kamala Harris at the convention. But the party undermined the spirit of democracy in every election. Democracy, at its core, is about letting the people decide for themselves. That simply didn’t happen. In fact, a very small number of Democratic Party donors and media elites chose Hillary Clinton, Biden, and Harris. In many ways it was the media who influenced donors and decided Biden should go after his disastrous debate performance. To the extent that ordinary Democratic Party voters turned against Biden it was in response to the media turning on him. When the media insisted that Biden was fine, and that the worries about his health were just right-wing propaganda, Democratic voters were loyal to him. While it’s true someone could challenge Harris for the nomination, it’s very hard to see that happening, given Biden’s endorsement and the argument from Kamala Harris supporters that it would be borderline racist for anyone else to win the nomination. Within a few hours, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Senator Tammy Baldwin, and Democratic mega-donor Reid Hoffman all endorsed Harris. Other Party elites will likely do the same. Over the last three weeks, Biden fought Democratic donors, media elites, and Party leaders. He insisted repeatedly he could do the job. But, in the end, they overwhelmed him. They withheld funding. They attacked almost every day, letting up for just 24 hours after the near-assassination of former President Trump. As a result, nobody could watch the events of the last few weeks and believe that the Democratic Party is democratic. It is a party controlled by the media, donors, and the deep state. However one feels about the GOP, the same can’t be said of Republicans. Republican voters rejected their own party leaders, donors, and the foreign policy establishment to nominate Trump for president in 2016. Democrats, by contrast, sided with the establishment candidate in choosing Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020. Why is that? Why did Democrats become the party controlled by elites and obedient to authority, and Republicans the party of rebellion and, increasingly, the working class?
5:38

Joe Biden has just announced he’s not running for re-election and will support Vice President Kamala Harris’s candidacy instead. The announcement came as a shock to the people who work at the White House and to campaign aides, one of whom told Politico, "We’re all finding out by tweet. None of us understand what’s happening.” The same was true in Delaware, Biden’s home state. “I don’t think a soul in Delaware knew,” said a Biden campaign official. As such, this is the third time in three presidential elections that Democratic Party elites have subverted democracy to choose a presidential candidate. The first time this occurred was in 2016 when the Democratic National Committee manipulated money and process to help Hillary Clinton defeat Bernie Sanders. The second time was in 2020, when Party elites pushed out Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar so Elizabeth Warren could split the progressive vote with Sanders, creating a path to victory for Biden. This year, Biden and the DNC prevented a competitive open primary, and now Biden is deciding who will be the nominee for Democrats. Harris was deeply unpopular with Democratic voters when she ran in the 2020 primary, leading her to drop out after her polling plummeted to the single digits. It’s true that the Democratic elites followed the formal rules, most Democrats agreed that Biden should not run again, and a Democrat could still challenge Kamala Harris at the convention. But the party undermined the spirit of democracy in every election. Democracy, at its core, is about letting the people decide for themselves. That simply didn’t happen. In fact, a very small number of Democratic Party donors and media elites chose Hillary Clinton, Biden, and Harris. In many ways it was the media who influenced donors and decided Biden should go after his disastrous debate performance. To the extent that ordinary Democratic Party voters turned against Biden it was in response to the media turning on him. When the media insisted that Biden was fine, and that the worries about his health were just right-wing propaganda, Democratic voters were loyal to him. While it’s true someone could challenge Harris for the nomination, it’s very hard to see that happening, given Biden’s endorsement and the argument from Kamala Harris supporters that it would be borderline racist for anyone else to win the nomination. Within a few hours, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Senator Tammy Baldwin, and Democratic mega-donor Reid Hoffman all endorsed Harris. Other Party elites will likely do the same. Over the last three weeks, Biden fought Democratic donors, media elites, and Party leaders. He insisted repeatedly he could do the job. But, in the end, they overwhelmed him. They withheld funding. They attacked almost every day, letting up for just 24 hours after the near-assassination of former President Trump. As a result, nobody could watch the events of the last few weeks and believe that the Democratic Party is democratic. It is a party controlled by the media, donors, and the deep state. However one feels about the GOP, the same can’t be said of Republicans. Republican voters rejected their own party leaders, donors, and the foreign policy establishment to nominate Trump for president in 2016. Democrats, by contrast, sided with the establishment candidate in choosing Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020. Why is that? Why did Democrats become the party controlled by elites and obedient to authority, and Republicans the party of rebellion and, increasingly, the working class?

Michael Shellenberger

1,189,589 次观看 • 2 年前

.Stephen A Smith: "The Democratic Party, whether it was Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris, said as a party, this is who we want to the voters and we're picking your candidates for you. That is the difference that has hurt the Democratic Party. They haven't been about the people."
0:49

.Stephen A Smith: "The Democratic Party, whether it was Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris, said as a party, this is who we want to the voters and we're picking your candidates for you. That is the difference that has hurt the Democratic Party. They haven't been about the people."

The Megyn Kelly Show

33,742 次观看 • 3 个月前

NEW: Stephen A. Smith admits Democrats got their “ass kicked” this election, and to make matters worse, “they have no bullpen.” “A blind man could see the Democrats got their ass kicked.” The problem with the Democrats, Stephen A. says, is that they “greased the skids” on the Democratic process. While Republicans chose Trump because that’s who they genuinely wanted, Democrats sabotaged Bernie Sanders in 2016 simply because it was Hillary’s “turn.” Now, the Democrats’ bench is so weak that they seriously entertained running an 82-year-old (Biden) as their top option. “What are you thinking [with Biden]? And then I looked at the bullpen, and they had no one. They had no one. They had no one that could compete with Donald Trump,” Smith concluded.
5:30

NEW: Stephen A. Smith admits Democrats got their “ass kicked” this election, and to make matters worse, “they have no bullpen.” “A blind man could see the Democrats got their ass kicked.” The problem with the Democrats, Stephen A. says, is that they “greased the skids” on the Democratic process. While Republicans chose Trump because that’s who they genuinely wanted, Democrats sabotaged Bernie Sanders in 2016 simply because it was Hillary’s “turn.” Now, the Democrats’ bench is so weak that they seriously entertained running an 82-year-old (Biden) as their top option. “What are you thinking [with Biden]? And then I looked at the bullpen, and they had no one. They had no one. They had no one that could compete with Donald Trump,” Smith concluded.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,537,318 次观看 • 1 年前

WATCH: Jill Biden says she had to walk out of the room after Kamala Harris pressured Joe Biden to endorse her immediately after dropping out of the 2024 presidential race RITA BRAVER: So he decided that it was- he was going to drop out. JILL BIDEN: That’s right. BRAVER: It was Sunday, July 21st, 2024. Before your husband made the announcement. he called Vice President Harris to tell her what he had decided, and you said almost as soon as he gave her the news, she demanded that he endorse her right away, and he- he, I mean, did you think something was off about that? BIDEN: You know, I'm sure she thought about it. You know it wasn't like a call out of the blue. I'm sure with everything happening at that time it had to cross her mind so I think, um, I think that's what- BRAVER: When you said it was back and forth because she wanted him, um, to endorse her at the same time he announced that he was dropping out and he wanted to just make the announcement of the dropout first, right? BIDEN: Oh yeah, sure. BRAVER: And you said you even walked out of the room because it was- got too tense maybe? BIDEN: Well, it was just, I'm telling you, it was so hard. I mean this is what Joe had worked for all his life. He loved being a statesman. Um, he loved the job of helping the American people and to give it up. I mean Rita, he did it for over 50 years of his life. That's a long time. And so at some point when all of this is going on. It gets a little overwhelming, and yes, I had to walk out.
1:48

WATCH: Jill Biden says she had to walk out of the room after Kamala Harris pressured Joe Biden to endorse her immediately after dropping out of the 2024 presidential race RITA BRAVER: So he decided that it was- he was going to drop out. JILL BIDEN: That’s right. BRAVER: It was Sunday, July 21st, 2024. Before your husband made the announcement. he called Vice President Harris to tell her what he had decided, and you said almost as soon as he gave her the news, she demanded that he endorse her right away, and he- he, I mean, did you think something was off about that? BIDEN: You know, I'm sure she thought about it. You know it wasn't like a call out of the blue. I'm sure with everything happening at that time it had to cross her mind so I think, um, I think that's what- BRAVER: When you said it was back and forth because she wanted him, um, to endorse her at the same time he announced that he was dropping out and he wanted to just make the announcement of the dropout first, right? BIDEN: Oh yeah, sure. BRAVER: And you said you even walked out of the room because it was- got too tense maybe? BIDEN: Well, it was just, I'm telling you, it was so hard. I mean this is what Joe had worked for all his life. He loved being a statesman. Um, he loved the job of helping the American people and to give it up. I mean Rita, he did it for over 50 years of his life. That's a long time. And so at some point when all of this is going on. It gets a little overwhelming, and yes, I had to walk out.

Jorge Bonilla

92,495 次观看 • 2 个月前

NEW: Bill Maher’s guest reminds him that Joe Biden had no issue with the “oligarchy” and the ultra-wealthy until it came back to bite the Democratic Party. MAHER: “Bezos, Musk, and Zuckerberg are all on the dais… And I don’t think Joe Biden is wrong.” ERIN PERRINE: “I find it very difficult for Joe Biden to credibly hold an argument about the tech-industrial complex, which has so served Democrats up to this point. He talks about the fact that there is extreme wealth and that this needs to be broken up. “Democrats didn’t have a problem with that extreme wealth when $1 billion was raised by Kamala Harris in under 100 days to try to fuel her to the presidency. Nobody minded extreme wealth then. They didn’t mind extreme power when Joe Biden was able to unilaterally pardon his son for over a decade of alleged or convicted crimes. “And they certainly didn’t mind extreme influence when both the Biden White House and the Biden campaign were pressuring these social media companies to suppress conversations, stories, the Hunter Biden laptop story, and people pushing back on Covid that they didn’t like. “So, while we can definitely have a conversation on the overall merits of regulation when it comes to social media companies and the uber-wealthy in this country, Joe Biden has no credibility to carry that argument.”
2:19

NEW: Bill Maher’s guest reminds him that Joe Biden had no issue with the “oligarchy” and the ultra-wealthy until it came back to bite the Democratic Party. MAHER: “Bezos, Musk, and Zuckerberg are all on the dais… And I don’t think Joe Biden is wrong.” ERIN PERRINE: “I find it very difficult for Joe Biden to credibly hold an argument about the tech-industrial complex, which has so served Democrats up to this point. He talks about the fact that there is extreme wealth and that this needs to be broken up. “Democrats didn’t have a problem with that extreme wealth when $1 billion was raised by Kamala Harris in under 100 days to try to fuel her to the presidency. Nobody minded extreme wealth then. They didn’t mind extreme power when Joe Biden was able to unilaterally pardon his son for over a decade of alleged or convicted crimes. “And they certainly didn’t mind extreme influence when both the Biden White House and the Biden campaign were pressuring these social media companies to suppress conversations, stories, the Hunter Biden laptop story, and people pushing back on Covid that they didn’t like. “So, while we can definitely have a conversation on the overall merits of regulation when it comes to social media companies and the uber-wealthy in this country, Joe Biden has no credibility to carry that argument.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,648,633 次观看 • 1 年前

Peter Thiel reluctantly agreed with Elon Musk's belief that if the Democratic Party won the 2024 election, it could consolidate power into a one-party state. "I didn't want to believe Elon when he said this, so I texted him and told him I hadn't believed you when you said this at first. But I think this is because, psychologically, I don't want to believe that." "The sense in which I felt that he was correct was if Trump, with much better substance and much better on so many things, could not win in 2024 against the machine, then the machine would always win." "And if the machine always wins, then you no longer have a democracy. You certainly no longer have a democratic process within the Democratic Party. We can always debate the election shenanigans in November 2020." "The far more extraordinary thing was in March of 2020 when Biden came in fourth or fifth in Iowa and New Hampshire and then somehow got rammed through South Carolina. All the other candidates drop out." "So, this extremely non-democratic primary in the Democratic Party in 2020 led to an even less democratic process in which Biden was replaced with Harris." "If the machine could defeat Trump, I thought it was reasonable that it would gain even more power and somehow be unbeatable, and the country would become like California, a one-party state." Elon Musk Peter Thiel
2:51

Peter Thiel reluctantly agreed with Elon Musk's belief that if the Democratic Party won the 2024 election, it could consolidate power into a one-party state. "I didn't want to believe Elon when he said this, so I texted him and told him I hadn't believed you when you said this at first. But I think this is because, psychologically, I don't want to believe that." "The sense in which I felt that he was correct was if Trump, with much better substance and much better on so many things, could not win in 2024 against the machine, then the machine would always win." "And if the machine always wins, then you no longer have a democracy. You certainly no longer have a democratic process within the Democratic Party. We can always debate the election shenanigans in November 2020." "The far more extraordinary thing was in March of 2020 when Biden came in fourth or fifth in Iowa and New Hampshire and then somehow got rammed through South Carolina. All the other candidates drop out." "So, this extremely non-democratic primary in the Democratic Party in 2020 led to an even less democratic process in which Biden was replaced with Harris." "If the machine could defeat Trump, I thought it was reasonable that it would gain even more power and somehow be unbeatable, and the country would become like California, a one-party state." Elon Musk Peter Thiel

KanekoaTheGreat

1,606,729 次观看 • 1 年前

This man was criticized for expecting a “thank you” for a good deed. He always saw the same man walking when he drove to work. He assumed the man was walking because he did not have any other means of transportation. He used his own money and bought the man an electric scooter, the man took the scooter and just silently walked away, no thank you or anything else at all. I don’t think that was too much to ask, a thank you goes a long way, otherwise it makes people look ungrateful. Back in college, I had a classmate that I always saw walking home after class. It didn’t matter whether it was raining or snowing, or hot out. Whenever I drove past him he always looked miserable and I could tell he didn’t like to walk all the time. In class I had asked him where he lived, and I found out it was on my way home so I offered to drop him off because it was really cold out and had snowed about a foot. He agreed and we chatted on the way home, nothing serious just pleasant conversation. I dropped him off and went on my way home. For me this was a one time thing, I only offered because how bad it was snowing. After class the next day, he walked with me and when I got to my car he got in. I didn’t agree or offer him a ride that day but he assumed that since I was ok with giving him a ride the day prior that I would be ok with it this day too. I didn’t say anything about it because at this point I didn’t care really. So the next day came and went, once again he walked with me to the car but that day was different. I wouldn’t be going his way because I had to work after class. So before I got to the car I said “I’ll see you tomorrow.” He looked dumbfounded and said aren’t you taking me home? I said no, I have to get to work. He then asked me how he would get home, and I told him the same way you always have. He then gave me excuses for why I was being a jerk because I was making him walk in the cold. I didn’t argue I just told him I helped him out when I could, but I wasn’t about to go out of my way because he didn’t have a car and besides I didn’t want to be late for work. He didn’t speak to me for the rest of the semester because of it, something tells me I was better off not offering to help in the first place.
4:05

This man was criticized for expecting a “thank you” for a good deed. He always saw the same man walking when he drove to work. He assumed the man was walking because he did not have any other means of transportation. He used his own money and bought the man an electric scooter, the man took the scooter and just silently walked away, no thank you or anything else at all. I don’t think that was too much to ask, a thank you goes a long way, otherwise it makes people look ungrateful. Back in college, I had a classmate that I always saw walking home after class. It didn’t matter whether it was raining or snowing, or hot out. Whenever I drove past him he always looked miserable and I could tell he didn’t like to walk all the time. In class I had asked him where he lived, and I found out it was on my way home so I offered to drop him off because it was really cold out and had snowed about a foot. He agreed and we chatted on the way home, nothing serious just pleasant conversation. I dropped him off and went on my way home. For me this was a one time thing, I only offered because how bad it was snowing. After class the next day, he walked with me and when I got to my car he got in. I didn’t agree or offer him a ride that day but he assumed that since I was ok with giving him a ride the day prior that I would be ok with it this day too. I didn’t say anything about it because at this point I didn’t care really. So the next day came and went, once again he walked with me to the car but that day was different. I wouldn’t be going his way because I had to work after class. So before I got to the car I said “I’ll see you tomorrow.” He looked dumbfounded and said aren’t you taking me home? I said no, I have to get to work. He then asked me how he would get home, and I told him the same way you always have. He then gave me excuses for why I was being a jerk because I was making him walk in the cold. I didn’t argue I just told him I helped him out when I could, but I wasn’t about to go out of my way because he didn’t have a car and besides I didn’t want to be late for work. He didn’t speak to me for the rest of the semester because of it, something tells me I was better off not offering to help in the first place.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

36,929 次观看 • 11 天前

Megyn Kelly breaks down the Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian Asset Hoax. “This was started by Hillary Clinton. She started it because Tulsi was a rising star within democratic politics. She had all the boxes checked. She was a woman. She is a minority, she was the first this and the first that, she was a combat vet, beautiful, well spoken, like, amazing. Then she started to be kind of open minded to what Bernie Sanders was saying and maybe had some problems with the Hillary Clinton messaging and having Hillary shoved down our throat as the Democratic nominee back in 16, and spoke up about it and started to make enemies in the party because of that, Then she was outraged when she found out the DNC cheated on behalf of Hillary to try to make sure she got the nomination and screwed Bernie, and she was angry and a rift was formed. Then Hillary Clinton called her a Russian asset just like Hillary Clinton's campaign was the one that made up that Donald Trump was a Russian asset.” “Hillary Clinton absolutely loved making up lies in her campaign about the Russians interfering in against anybody who she didn't like or wanted to undermine. Tulsi was just one of them.”
2:43

Megyn Kelly breaks down the Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian Asset Hoax. “This was started by Hillary Clinton. She started it because Tulsi was a rising star within democratic politics. She had all the boxes checked. She was a woman. She is a minority, she was the first this and the first that, she was a combat vet, beautiful, well spoken, like, amazing. Then she started to be kind of open minded to what Bernie Sanders was saying and maybe had some problems with the Hillary Clinton messaging and having Hillary shoved down our throat as the Democratic nominee back in 16, and spoke up about it and started to make enemies in the party because of that, Then she was outraged when she found out the DNC cheated on behalf of Hillary to try to make sure she got the nomination and screwed Bernie, and she was angry and a rift was formed. Then Hillary Clinton called her a Russian asset just like Hillary Clinton's campaign was the one that made up that Donald Trump was a Russian asset.” “Hillary Clinton absolutely loved making up lies in her campaign about the Russians interfering in against anybody who she didn't like or wanted to undermine. Tulsi was just one of them.”

End Tribalism in Politics

1,279,329 次观看 • 1 年前

Bill Maher: “First of all, you have to go through a primary gauntlet in the Democratic Party. Don’t you in the Democratic Party?” Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (D): “We like to have spirited primaries... I’d like to think that when democracy works well, you have that. Bill Maher: “Well, we didn’t have any for Kamala [Harris]... Just throwing that out there. Should we have?” Gov. Beshear: “With that time period I think it would have been challenging... She worked hard. Now if she had more time. If the Democratic Party had more time maybe things would have been different.” Bill Maher: “Well, it all came out for the best… I think she should have had less time.”
1:07

Bill Maher: “First of all, you have to go through a primary gauntlet in the Democratic Party. Don’t you in the Democratic Party?” Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (D): “We like to have spirited primaries... I’d like to think that when democracy works well, you have that. Bill Maher: “Well, we didn’t have any for Kamala [Harris]... Just throwing that out there. Should we have?” Gov. Beshear: “With that time period I think it would have been challenging... She worked hard. Now if she had more time. If the Democratic Party had more time maybe things would have been different.” Bill Maher: “Well, it all came out for the best… I think she should have had less time.”

RedWave Press

299,617 次观看 • 9 个月前

Democrats are furious that Joe Rogan was standing behind President Trump in the Oval Office today. Trump said, “Joe Rogan is a fantastic person. We did a little interview before the election. We had over 300 million people. And I said, ‘Oh man, I hope Kamala doesn’t do it.’ And she didn’t. He wanted her to do it but she didn’t. Someday Joe’s going to explain why. I could tell you why—because she didn’t want to.” Kamala not going on Rogan was a costly mistake for her chances in the 2024 presidential election. Democrats know this. So when they see Joe Rogan with President Trump, they’re triggered like nothing else. Just search their comments today about this. They’re so unhinged. It’s awesome.
0:27

Democrats are furious that Joe Rogan was standing behind President Trump in the Oval Office today. Trump said, “Joe Rogan is a fantastic person. We did a little interview before the election. We had over 300 million people. And I said, ‘Oh man, I hope Kamala doesn’t do it.’ And she didn’t. He wanted her to do it but she didn’t. Someday Joe’s going to explain why. I could tell you why—because she didn’t want to.” Kamala not going on Rogan was a costly mistake for her chances in the 2024 presidential election. Democrats know this. So when they see Joe Rogan with President Trump, they’re triggered like nothing else. Just search their comments today about this. They’re so unhinged. It’s awesome.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

14,350 次观看 • 3 个月前

Naz Ried on his name being in the J. Cole track The Fall Off (Incredibly wholesome answer, listen to it all if you can) “That was fire, I had no clue, I didn’t know he knew me. That was crazy, the bar was crazy, I mean especially being a song from the album and it’s really good. If you ask me that’s the best song, not because of my name but you could add that in there… I woke up and a few people told me about it, and I was like what are you talking about. Then I checked out, it’s a good song and I’ve been playing it sense, you know, got to make sure everybody hear it”
1:42

Naz Ried on his name being in the J. Cole track The Fall Off (Incredibly wholesome answer, listen to it all if you can) “That was fire, I had no clue, I didn’t know he knew me. That was crazy, the bar was crazy, I mean especially being a song from the album and it’s really good. If you ask me that’s the best song, not because of my name but you could add that in there… I woke up and a few people told me about it, and I was like what are you talking about. Then I checked out, it’s a good song and I’ve been playing it sense, you know, got to make sure everybody hear it”

Andrew Dukowitz

630,054 次观看 • 6 个月前

“Why was America and the Democrats okay with America’s performance for the past 4 years when Biden was your President?” “But when you get someone that’s in the Presidency that’s doing something for you!.. Aha! Then you have a problem with it!” This man is speaking FACTS 🔥👇🏼
1:00

“Why was America and the Democrats okay with America’s performance for the past 4 years when Biden was your President?” “But when you get someone that’s in the Presidency that’s doing something for you!.. Aha! Then you have a problem with it!” This man is speaking FACTS 🔥👇🏼

TONY™

762,979 次观看 • 1 年前

There was a screening of “Melania the Movie” Saturday night and all of those closest to Trump were supposed to be there,but it didn’t turn out the way she hoped because that morning ICE agents murdered Alex Pretti in Minnesota! I guess her turn out is sucking everywhere!
1:36

There was a screening of “Melania the Movie” Saturday night and all of those closest to Trump were supposed to be there,but it didn’t turn out the way she hoped because that morning ICE agents murdered Alex Pretti in Minnesota! I guess her turn out is sucking everywhere!

Suzie rizzio

103,584 次观看 • 6 个月前