正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Stephen C. Meyer says Darwin’s theory of evolution has, for many, become more like a religion than a scientific theory. “Darwinian evolution functions as a kind of secular religion.” “And you can see why, because it's answering one of the most fundamental questions that any worldview or religion has... to answer.” “Which is what is the thing or the entity or the process from which everything else came?” “And the neo-Darwinian explanation of the origin of new forms of life is part of the answer to that really fundamental question, which is not only a scientific question but a philosophical worldview question.” “Because it functions like a secular religion, sometimes there's resistance to a more dispassionate scientific evaluation of its merits.” Stephen C. Meyershow more

Jan Jekielek

215,359 subscribers

199,433 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Most people were taught Darwin’s theory of evolution explains how all life came to be. What if that’s not the full story? Stephen C. Meyer says growing evidence is challenging that idea, and many scientists are now calling for a new theory of evolution. “There’s a huge difference between the idea that natural selection is a real process… and the claim that it has unlimited creative power.” “Many leading evolutionary biologists today are now calling for a new theory of evolution.” “They recognize that the mutation natural selection mechanism has limited creative power.” “It does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation and adaptation.” “But it doesn’t do a good job of explaining… major new body plans or new forms.” Stephen C. Meyer

Most people were taught Darwin’s theory of evolution explains how all life came to be. What if that’s not the full story? Stephen C. Meyer says growing evidence is challenging that idea, and many scientists are now calling for a new theory of evolution. “There’s a huge difference between the idea that natural selection is a real process… and the claim that it has unlimited creative power.” “Many leading evolutionary biologists today are now calling for a new theory of evolution.” “They recognize that the mutation natural selection mechanism has limited creative power.” “It does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation and adaptation.” “But it doesn’t do a good job of explaining… major new body plans or new forms.” Stephen C. Meyer

Jan Jekielek

77,522 次观看 • 4 个月前

A seismic shift is quietly taking place in the scientific community. Stephen C. Meyer just told me that a growing number of scientists are admitting the theory of evolution is not enough to explain humanity’s origins. And they’re opening up to the theory of intelligent design. So I asked him: why has there been such incredible hostility towards the theory of intelligent design? His answer was illuminating: “The underlying ideology that has governed modern science since the late 19th century is one of materialism.” “There’s a materialistic world view that many scientists have in a sense bolted onto science, and said that science equals materialism.” “There’s been a convention that’s arisen that says: if you’re gonna explain something scientifically, you must explain it by reference to strictly materialistic processes.” “No creative intelligence is allowed as a possible feature in your explanation.” “It reflects an underlying commitment to not just a methodological convention, but a metaphysical commitment.” But things are changing, according to Meyer. “In the last 5 or 10 years, I think there’s a lot more acceptance that… neo-Darwinism is not an adequate evolutionary theory.” “Increasing numbers of scientists are now aligning with our work.” Stephen C. Meyer

A seismic shift is quietly taking place in the scientific community. Stephen C. Meyer just told me that a growing number of scientists are admitting the theory of evolution is not enough to explain humanity’s origins. And they’re opening up to the theory of intelligent design. So I asked him: why has there been such incredible hostility towards the theory of intelligent design? His answer was illuminating: “The underlying ideology that has governed modern science since the late 19th century is one of materialism.” “There’s a materialistic world view that many scientists have in a sense bolted onto science, and said that science equals materialism.” “There’s been a convention that’s arisen that says: if you’re gonna explain something scientifically, you must explain it by reference to strictly materialistic processes.” “No creative intelligence is allowed as a possible feature in your explanation.” “It reflects an underlying commitment to not just a methodological convention, but a metaphysical commitment.” But things are changing, according to Meyer. “In the last 5 or 10 years, I think there’s a lot more acceptance that… neo-Darwinism is not an adequate evolutionary theory.” “Increasing numbers of scientists are now aligning with our work.” Stephen C. Meyer

Jan Jekielek

70,950 次观看 • 4 个月前

Stephen Meyer explaining why the discovery of the structure of DNA presented an unexpected challenge to the atheistic worldview: "What's really fun is that Francis Crick was a codebreaker in World War II and he ended up breaking the ultimate code. The irony is that Crick and Watson were also strict scientific materialists. They were atheists and they were looking for the material basis for life, and they thought they found it in 1953 until Crick realized it's not just a molecule. It's a molecule that contains code. And that discovery ends up being foundational. It provides evidence of what we're going to call Intelligent Design. And it has created a complete impass in evolutionary theory. People cannot account for the origin of the information needed to build the first life or subsequent forms of life... Even though Watson and Crick were looking for the material foundation for life, what they actually found was something more like software. And Bill Gates has said that DNA is like a computer program but far more advanced than ever any we've ever created."

Stephen Meyer explaining why the discovery of the structure of DNA presented an unexpected challenge to the atheistic worldview: "What's really fun is that Francis Crick was a codebreaker in World War II and he ended up breaking the ultimate code. The irony is that Crick and Watson were also strict scientific materialists. They were atheists and they were looking for the material basis for life, and they thought they found it in 1953 until Crick realized it's not just a molecule. It's a molecule that contains code. And that discovery ends up being foundational. It provides evidence of what we're going to call Intelligent Design. And it has created a complete impass in evolutionary theory. People cannot account for the origin of the information needed to build the first life or subsequent forms of life... Even though Watson and Crick were looking for the material foundation for life, what they actually found was something more like software. And Bill Gates has said that DNA is like a computer program but far more advanced than ever any we've ever created."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

14,033 次观看 • 4 个月前

ELON: THE WOKE MIND VIRUS IS LIKE A WOKE RELIGION “When you have essentially a decline in religion, an increase in the secular nature of society, for most people, they need something to fill that void. So they adopt a religion—it’s not called a religion, but effectively, the woke mind virus takes the place of religion. They internalize it, and they fill it with religious fervor. They effectively conduct a holy war. It's just not called a religion, but it is a religion. Sort of a woke holy war. And they're highly resistant to change, as is normal for religions.” Source: Tucker Carlson, October 2024

ELON: THE WOKE MIND VIRUS IS LIKE A WOKE RELIGION “When you have essentially a decline in religion, an increase in the secular nature of society, for most people, they need something to fill that void. So they adopt a religion—it’s not called a religion, but effectively, the woke mind virus takes the place of religion. They internalize it, and they fill it with religious fervor. They effectively conduct a holy war. It's just not called a religion, but it is a religion. Sort of a woke holy war. And they're highly resistant to change, as is normal for religions.” Source: Tucker Carlson, October 2024

Mario Nawfal

2,329,104 次观看 • 1 年前

“What Christianity has that Islam does not is a concept of the secular.” In this clip, historian Tom Holland discusses how Christianity introduced the Western idea of separating religion from everyday life, a concept largely absent in Islam, which traditionally governs all aspects of life, and in Judaism, which only adapted to this model in the modern secular West.

“What Christianity has that Islam does not is a concept of the secular.” In this clip, historian Tom Holland discusses how Christianity introduced the Western idea of separating religion from everyday life, a concept largely absent in Islam, which traditionally governs all aspects of life, and in Judaism, which only adapted to this model in the modern secular West.

TRIGGERnometry

48,744 次观看 • 11 个月前

Stephen Meyer just exposed one of the dirtiest secrets of modern science. We’re constantly told: “Trust the science.” “The scientific consensus says…” But scientists are only exposing themselves when they say things like that, according to Meyer. “When scientists appeal to consensus, almost invariably, there isn’t one.” “You only appeal to consensus to shut down dissenting opinions.” “If there really is a consensus, you don’t need to appeal to one.” “Scientists never say: the consensus is that the formula for water is H2O.” “They only appeal to consensus when there’s actual debate, and they want to shut down a dissenting group of scientists who hold a different opinion.” “We’ve had this move made or applied against us numerous times.” “Proponents of intelligent design, or critics of Darwinian evolution or neo-Darwinian evolution will be told: this is settled science, and to challenge it is pseudoscience.” “When there’s an appeal to consensus… it’s usually a rhetorical ploy to silence an alternative perspective or a group of dissenting scientists.” “And this is actually ironically profoundly unscientific behavior.” “If there’s no serious dissent, you don’t need to appeal to consensus.” “When people appeal to settled science or consensus, it’s often a tell that there’s subterranean dissent that needs to be heard.” Stay tuned for my full interview with Stephen C. Meyer—coming this Saturday at 5PM ET!

Stephen Meyer just exposed one of the dirtiest secrets of modern science. We’re constantly told: “Trust the science.” “The scientific consensus says…” But scientists are only exposing themselves when they say things like that, according to Meyer. “When scientists appeal to consensus, almost invariably, there isn’t one.” “You only appeal to consensus to shut down dissenting opinions.” “If there really is a consensus, you don’t need to appeal to one.” “Scientists never say: the consensus is that the formula for water is H2O.” “They only appeal to consensus when there’s actual debate, and they want to shut down a dissenting group of scientists who hold a different opinion.” “We’ve had this move made or applied against us numerous times.” “Proponents of intelligent design, or critics of Darwinian evolution or neo-Darwinian evolution will be told: this is settled science, and to challenge it is pseudoscience.” “When there’s an appeal to consensus… it’s usually a rhetorical ploy to silence an alternative perspective or a group of dissenting scientists.” “And this is actually ironically profoundly unscientific behavior.” “If there’s no serious dissent, you don’t need to appeal to consensus.” “When people appeal to settled science or consensus, it’s often a tell that there’s subterranean dissent that needs to be heard.” Stay tuned for my full interview with Stephen C. Meyer—coming this Saturday at 5PM ET!

Jan Jekielek

11,823 次观看 • 4 个月前

Greek Defense Minister Nikos Dendias: Defense is not just a question of production lines or a question of armaments or the question of the number of armed forces or the question of the number of fighter planes. There is something much more substantial and that will take time and that is culture. The young generation of Europeans do not comprehend yet the need to serve the country, to serve an ideal, to serve the defense of what has been created by the European Union, which is a space of democracy, human rights, rule of law, rights of women.

Greek Defense Minister Nikos Dendias: Defense is not just a question of production lines or a question of armaments or the question of the number of armed forces or the question of the number of fighter planes. There is something much more substantial and that will take time and that is culture. The young generation of Europeans do not comprehend yet the need to serve the country, to serve an ideal, to serve the defense of what has been created by the European Union, which is a space of democracy, human rights, rule of law, rights of women.

Clash Report

24,176 次观看 • 6 个月前

Muslim man in America is asked a simple question, “If you like your religion so much, why don't you go to a Muslim country?” The Muslim man proudly proclaims “This is a Muslim country” and they are here to take over America “whether you like it or not.” He straight up says this is their goal her “This is a Muslim country and every single one of you will be Muslim. It's just that simple because Allah says this religion of mine will enter every single home whether you like it or not. It would overtake every religion whether you like it or not.”

Muslim man in America is asked a simple question, “If you like your religion so much, why don't you go to a Muslim country?” The Muslim man proudly proclaims “This is a Muslim country” and they are here to take over America “whether you like it or not.” He straight up says this is their goal her “This is a Muslim country and every single one of you will be Muslim. It's just that simple because Allah says this religion of mine will enter every single home whether you like it or not. It would overtake every religion whether you like it or not.”

Wall Street Apes

1,675,058 次观看 • 10 个月前

.Naval: You have a beautiful definition of knowledge, which most people don’t even try to tackle, about how knowledge perpetuates itself in the environment. You gave some really good examples. One was around genes. Successful, highly adapted genes contain a lot of knowledge and can cause themselves to be replicated because they’re survivors. In the same way, knowledge itself is a survivor, in that if you transmit to me the knowledge of how to build a computer, it’s an incredibly useful thing. I’m going to build more and more computers and that knowledge will be passed on. Your underlying point that you repeated here was if you want to understand the physical universe you have to understand knowledge, because it is the thing that over time takes over and changes more and more the universe—more than almost anything else. You have to understand all the explanations behind it. You can’t just say “particle collisions” because that explains everything, so it explains nothing. It’s not a useful level to operate at. Therefore, the things that create knowledge are uniquely influential in the universe. And as far as we know, there are only two systems that create knowledge. There’s evolution and there are humans. But is there a difference even between these two forms of knowledge creation, between evolution and between humans? David Deutsch: Yes. I have argued that the human way of creating knowledge is the ultimate one, that there aren’t any more powerful ones than that. This is the argument against the supernatural. Assuming that there is a form of knowledge creation that’s more powerful than ours is equivalent to invoking the supernatural, which is therefore a bad explanation—as invoking the supernatural always is. The difference between biological evolution and human creative thought is that biological evolution is inherently limited in its range. That’s because biological evolution has no foresight. It can’t see a problem and conjecture a solution. Whenever biological evolution produces a solution to something, it’s always before natural selection has even begun. This is Charles Darwin’s insight. This is the difference between Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and the other theories of evolution that had been around for a century or more before that, including Charles Darwin’s grandfather and Lamarck. The thing they didn’t get is that the creation of knowledge in evolution begins before. That means that biological evolution can’t reach places that are not reachable by successive improvements, each of which allows a viable organism to exist. Creationists say that biological evolution has, in fact, reached things that are not reachable by incremental steps, each of which is a viable organism. They’re factually mistaken. The thing which they have in mind is the idea of a creator who can imagine things that don’t exist and who can create an idea that is not the culmination of a whole load of viable things. A thinking being can create something that’s a culmination of a whole load of non-viable things. Explanatory creativity makes humans unique Out of all the billions and billions of species that have ever existed, none of them has ever made a campfire, even though many of them would’ve been helped by having the genetic capacity to make campfires. The reason it didn’t happen in the biosphere is that there is no such thing as making a partially functional campfire; whereas there is, for example, with making hot water. The bombardier beetles squirt boiling water at their enemies. You can easily see that just squirting cold water at your enemies is not totally unhelpful. Then making it a bit hotter and a bit hotter. Squirting boiling water no doubt required many adaptations to make sure the beetle didn’t boil itself while it was making this boiling water. That happened because there was a sequence of steps in between, all of which were useful. But with campfires, it’s very hard to see how that could happen. Humans have explanatory creativity. Once you have that, you can get to the moon. You can cause asteroids which are heading towards the earth to turn around and go away. Perhaps no other planet in the universe has that power, and it has it only because of the presence of explanatory creativity on it.

.Naval: You have a beautiful definition of knowledge, which most people don’t even try to tackle, about how knowledge perpetuates itself in the environment. You gave some really good examples. One was around genes. Successful, highly adapted genes contain a lot of knowledge and can cause themselves to be replicated because they’re survivors. In the same way, knowledge itself is a survivor, in that if you transmit to me the knowledge of how to build a computer, it’s an incredibly useful thing. I’m going to build more and more computers and that knowledge will be passed on. Your underlying point that you repeated here was if you want to understand the physical universe you have to understand knowledge, because it is the thing that over time takes over and changes more and more the universe—more than almost anything else. You have to understand all the explanations behind it. You can’t just say “particle collisions” because that explains everything, so it explains nothing. It’s not a useful level to operate at. Therefore, the things that create knowledge are uniquely influential in the universe. And as far as we know, there are only two systems that create knowledge. There’s evolution and there are humans. But is there a difference even between these two forms of knowledge creation, between evolution and between humans? David Deutsch: Yes. I have argued that the human way of creating knowledge is the ultimate one, that there aren’t any more powerful ones than that. This is the argument against the supernatural. Assuming that there is a form of knowledge creation that’s more powerful than ours is equivalent to invoking the supernatural, which is therefore a bad explanation—as invoking the supernatural always is. The difference between biological evolution and human creative thought is that biological evolution is inherently limited in its range. That’s because biological evolution has no foresight. It can’t see a problem and conjecture a solution. Whenever biological evolution produces a solution to something, it’s always before natural selection has even begun. This is Charles Darwin’s insight. This is the difference between Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and the other theories of evolution that had been around for a century or more before that, including Charles Darwin’s grandfather and Lamarck. The thing they didn’t get is that the creation of knowledge in evolution begins before. That means that biological evolution can’t reach places that are not reachable by successive improvements, each of which allows a viable organism to exist. Creationists say that biological evolution has, in fact, reached things that are not reachable by incremental steps, each of which is a viable organism. They’re factually mistaken. The thing which they have in mind is the idea of a creator who can imagine things that don’t exist and who can create an idea that is not the culmination of a whole load of viable things. A thinking being can create something that’s a culmination of a whole load of non-viable things. Explanatory creativity makes humans unique Out of all the billions and billions of species that have ever existed, none of them has ever made a campfire, even though many of them would’ve been helped by having the genetic capacity to make campfires. The reason it didn’t happen in the biosphere is that there is no such thing as making a partially functional campfire; whereas there is, for example, with making hot water. The bombardier beetles squirt boiling water at their enemies. You can easily see that just squirting cold water at your enemies is not totally unhelpful. Then making it a bit hotter and a bit hotter. Squirting boiling water no doubt required many adaptations to make sure the beetle didn’t boil itself while it was making this boiling water. That happened because there was a sequence of steps in between, all of which were useful. But with campfires, it’s very hard to see how that could happen. Humans have explanatory creativity. Once you have that, you can get to the moon. You can cause asteroids which are heading towards the earth to turn around and go away. Perhaps no other planet in the universe has that power, and it has it only because of the presence of explanatory creativity on it.

Deutsch Explains

186,329 次观看 • 1 年前

.tylercowen believes AI will change religion just as profoundly as past technologies like the printing press. "People more and more look to the AIs for wisdom, therapy, counseling, warmth, and dialogue. This will extend into the sphere of religion." "Why ask your priest or rabbi when the AI knows more about the Bible or the history of the Catholic Church? I think a lot of people will do religion solo through their AIs. Over time, more oracles will evolve. It'll be an kind of implicit polytheism." "Religion changes every time there's a new technology. We saw that with the printing press. This is the next stage in that evolution." From his appearance on the show in January.

.tylercowen believes AI will change religion just as profoundly as past technologies like the printing press. "People more and more look to the AIs for wisdom, therapy, counseling, warmth, and dialogue. This will extend into the sphere of religion." "Why ask your priest or rabbi when the AI knows more about the Bible or the history of the Catholic Church? I think a lot of people will do religion solo through their AIs. Over time, more oracles will evolve. It'll be an kind of implicit polytheism." "Religion changes every time there's a new technology. We saw that with the printing press. This is the next stage in that evolution." From his appearance on the show in January.

TBPN

30,277 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Elon Musk on the revival of religion: “if you take away religion, you get something in its place which is actually worse than what was there before.” “You get the woke mind virus, filling the hole that religion used to have.” “Perhaps some sort of revival of religion, or at least what we need is some coherent philosophy that people can get excited about.” “For me, it's a philosophy of curiosity.“ Via The All-In Podcast

.Elon Musk on the revival of religion: “if you take away religion, you get something in its place which is actually worse than what was there before.” “You get the woke mind virus, filling the hole that religion used to have.” “Perhaps some sort of revival of religion, or at least what we need is some coherent philosophy that people can get excited about.” “For me, it's a philosophy of curiosity.“ Via The All-In Podcast

Jawwwn

101,798 次观看 • 4 个月前

WHAT IS THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION? Luke Gromen asks: "Why can't the most powerful military in the world reopen the Strait of Hormuz?" Perhaps the Secretary of War Pete Hegseth can answer this question or a military expert like Halsey English from the video below? Or does someone else here know the answer to this question?

WHAT IS THE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION? Luke Gromen asks: "Why can't the most powerful military in the world reopen the Strait of Hormuz?" Perhaps the Secretary of War Pete Hegseth can answer this question or a military expert like Halsey English from the video below? Or does someone else here know the answer to this question?

Mark

22,682 次观看 • 5 个月前

No matter where you stand on the #Evolution vs. #Creation debate, you have to acknowledge it's at the very least eyebrow-raising that there isn't a single real-life observable example of darwinian "changing of kinds" taking place (ex: bacteria ➡️ fish ➡️ primate ➡️ human, which is the official scientific explanation for how humans came to exist). Only minor environmental adaptations have ever been observed. All "changing of kinds" hypothyses are 100% theory.

No matter where you stand on the #Evolution vs. #Creation debate, you have to acknowledge it's at the very least eyebrow-raising that there isn't a single real-life observable example of darwinian "changing of kinds" taking place (ex: bacteria ➡️ fish ➡️ primate ➡️ human, which is the official scientific explanation for how humans came to exist). Only minor environmental adaptations have ever been observed. All "changing of kinds" hypothyses are 100% theory.

Ben Wehrman

78,387 次观看 • 5 个月前

Geologist, Prof. Ian Plimer, on the climate hoax: "The whole thing is a scientific house of cards." "For some years, I have been pursuing leading scientists with a fundamental question, and that is: 'Can you please show me half a dozen scientific papers that demonstrate that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming?'... I've never had an answer." "But just imagine someone gave me half a dozen scientific papers. They would also have to show me that the natural emissions, which are 97% of the total, don't drive global warming. So it's checkmate before the game starts." Credit: James Freeman @tntradiolive

Geologist, Prof. Ian Plimer, on the climate hoax: "The whole thing is a scientific house of cards." "For some years, I have been pursuing leading scientists with a fundamental question, and that is: 'Can you please show me half a dozen scientific papers that demonstrate that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming?'... I've never had an answer." "But just imagine someone gave me half a dozen scientific papers. They would also have to show me that the natural emissions, which are 97% of the total, don't drive global warming. So it's checkmate before the game starts." Credit: James Freeman @tntradiolive

Wide Awake Media

152,049 次观看 • 2 年前

Not Amravati or jobs or IT or skill development but the religion of his predecessor- This is what Chandrababu Naidu has reduced Andhra politics to. A former Chief Minister has to declare what his religion is. ‘Humanity is my religion’ says YS Jagan Mohan Reddy

Not Amravati or jobs or IT or skill development but the religion of his predecessor- This is what Chandrababu Naidu has reduced Andhra politics to. A former Chief Minister has to declare what his religion is. ‘Humanity is my religion’ says YS Jagan Mohan Reddy

Rohini Singh

184,570 次观看 • 1 年前

"It's automated to a degree that is just MIND-BLOWING!" Stephen Meyer returns to Uncensored to discuss the 'God Hypothesis' and why he believes it scientifically explains the origin of the universe 👇 📺 Piers Morgan | Stephen C. Meyer

"It's automated to a degree that is just MIND-BLOWING!" Stephen Meyer returns to Uncensored to discuss the 'God Hypothesis' and why he believes it scientifically explains the origin of the universe 👇 📺 Piers Morgan | Stephen C. Meyer

Piers Morgan Uncensored

77,327 次观看 • 4 个月前

Constitutional clause of guaranteeing the Freedom of Religion and Belief which has removed from the proposals presented to parliament has been returned now: “Every person is free to practice his or her religion.”

Constitutional clause of guaranteeing the Freedom of Religion and Belief which has removed from the proposals presented to parliament has been returned now: “Every person is free to practice his or her religion.”

saedawke

30,626 次观看 • 2 年前

Sneako asks Korra how she responds to claims that Islam is a demonic religion “What’s more demonic? The religion that praises Jesus and preaches absolute oneness… Or the religion that says you eat the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ?”

Sneako asks Korra how she responds to claims that Islam is a demonic religion “What’s more demonic? The religion that praises Jesus and preaches absolute oneness… Or the religion that says you eat the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ?”

AutisticClips

46,473 次观看 • 3 个月前