Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Stephen Colbert concluded his interview with Meryl Streep by inviting her to talk about whatever she wants and she went for the voter suppression fearmongering, "the SAVE America Act, if that passes, all the married women that have changed their names are going to have to go to the... show more

Alex Christy

5,561 subscribers

195,227 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Meryl Streep: The SAVE America Act, if that passes, all the married women that have changed their names are going have to go to the registrar and prove who they are. Otherwise, when you get to the voting booth in November, you might be disqualified, because your name on your birth certificate doesn't match the name on the voting rolls. I think that women need to be heard

Meryl Streep: The SAVE America Act, if that passes, all the married women that have changed their names are going have to go to the registrar and prove who they are. Otherwise, when you get to the voting booth in November, you might be disqualified, because your name on your birth certificate doesn't match the name on the voting rolls. I think that women need to be heard

Headquarters

613,711 views • 4 months ago

🚨 THIS WOMAN IS SPOT ON about the SAVE America Act! The Left is lying to you! Woman: “‘Good luck voting as a married woman if the SAVE Act passes.’ I swear, I think your guys 14 boosters actually made you retarded. As a married woman, you will still be able to vote even if your name changed. The SAVE Act means that you will have to bring a form of documentation in addition to your driver's license, whether it's a passport or a birth certificate. I understand not everyone has a passport. Everyone has a birth certificate. You change your name when you get married, it won't match the name on your birth certificate, but do you know what you get when you do get married? A marriage license. Come on, people. This is the last thing I wanna be talking about right now, but I cannot stand the blatant lies on the internet on videos with millions of likes.”

🚨 THIS WOMAN IS SPOT ON about the SAVE America Act! The Left is lying to you! Woman: “‘Good luck voting as a married woman if the SAVE Act passes.’ I swear, I think your guys 14 boosters actually made you retarded. As a married woman, you will still be able to vote even if your name changed. The SAVE Act means that you will have to bring a form of documentation in addition to your driver's license, whether it's a passport or a birth certificate. I understand not everyone has a passport. Everyone has a birth certificate. You change your name when you get married, it won't match the name on your birth certificate, but do you know what you get when you do get married? A marriage license. Come on, people. This is the last thing I wanna be talking about right now, but I cannot stand the blatant lies on the internet on videos with millions of likes.”

Gunther Eagleman™

641,680 views • 6 months ago

The House voted on the SAVE Act. This voter suppression bill will disenfranchise millions of voters, especially married women. If you got married and changed your name, your ID will not match your birth certificate and if you do not have a passport to prove your citizenship—you will not be able to cast your ballot. These efforts are un-American. Voted NO.

The House voted on the SAVE Act. This voter suppression bill will disenfranchise millions of voters, especially married women. If you got married and changed your name, your ID will not match your birth certificate and if you do not have a passport to prove your citizenship—you will not be able to cast your ballot. These efforts are un-American. Voted NO.

Rep. Ilhan Omar

169,172 views • 1 year ago

The Save Act says your name must match your birth certificate to be able to vote. Married women who took their husbands’ names wouldn't be able to vote if the SA passes. JD Vance’s name doesn't match his birth certificate either. Will he be able to vote? #HandsOffHerVote

The Save Act says your name must match your birth certificate to be able to vote. Married women who took their husbands’ names wouldn't be able to vote if the SA passes. JD Vance’s name doesn't match his birth certificate either. Will he be able to vote? #HandsOffHerVote

Maca Iglesias

616,334 views • 1 year ago

Rep. Hillary Scholten says the Save Act will prevent 160k women from voting in her district because they didn’t change their last names on their birth certificates after getting married. You literally don’t change your name on your birth certificate — are these people dumb!?

Rep. Hillary Scholten says the Save Act will prevent 160k women from voting in her district because they didn’t change their last names on their birth certificates after getting married. You literally don’t change your name on your birth certificate — are these people dumb!?

American AF 🇺🇸

1,303,589 views • 6 months ago

Rep. Torres on the SAVE Act: 69 million women who follow the traditional practice of changing their name after marriage do not have a birth certificate that matches their legal name. Republicans know this and want to use that to block them from voting. This is voter suppression

Rep. Torres on the SAVE Act: 69 million women who follow the traditional practice of changing their name after marriage do not have a birth certificate that matches their legal name. Republicans know this and want to use that to block them from voting. This is voter suppression

Headquarters

470,009 views • 6 months ago

NEW: Actress Meryl Streep suggests the SAVE America Act can't pass because married women would have to "go to the registrar." The horror... Angry women in the crowd of the Stephen Colbert show were heard losing their minds when Streep made the comment. "This is such a pain in the neck... Women need to be heard."

NEW: Actress Meryl Streep suggests the SAVE America Act can't pass because married women would have to "go to the registrar." The horror... Angry women in the crowd of the Stephen Colbert show were heard losing their minds when Streep made the comment. "This is such a pain in the neck... Women need to be heard."

Collin Rugg

226,983 views • 4 months ago

“If you’re a married woman, you have to go back and find your birth certificate, and you have to change your name because the name on your ID right now is the name of your husband, and that’s not good enough!” The level of retardation around the SAVE Act is unparalleled. I assume she means you need to update your name on your birth certificate. You do not. You could literally just provide your marriage certificate or your passport.

“If you’re a married woman, you have to go back and find your birth certificate, and you have to change your name because the name on your ID right now is the name of your husband, and that’s not good enough!” The level of retardation around the SAVE Act is unparalleled. I assume she means you need to update your name on your birth certificate. You do not. You could literally just provide your marriage certificate or your passport.

Natalie Jean Beisner

60,812 views • 5 months ago

#BREAKING: Sen Tammy Duckworth: “If you have a different name on your birth certificate than is on your drivers license, you CANNOT vote, and so for the 69 MILLION American WOMEN who took their husband’s names, you cannot vote. That birth certificate is not valid. By the way, military IDs will not be valid for you to be able to vote, neither will your REAL ID…So you have to go in with a passport that matches your current ID, and you know how hard it is to get a passport? Number one, it’s expensive and number two, theres such a backlog in the State Department, some people are waiting 3-6 months to get a passport. And so, think about the 69 million American women who married and took their husband’s name, you can no longer vote under the #SAVEAct…and in order to have housing for young people who…don’t see home ownership as being something that they can achieve, he’s going to hold women who are married and took their husband’s name hostage.” 🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING: Sen Tammy Duckworth: “If you have a different name on your birth certificate than is on your drivers license, you CANNOT vote, and so for the 69 MILLION American WOMEN who took their husband’s names, you cannot vote. That birth certificate is not valid. By the way, military IDs will not be valid for you to be able to vote, neither will your REAL ID…So you have to go in with a passport that matches your current ID, and you know how hard it is to get a passport? Number one, it’s expensive and number two, theres such a backlog in the State Department, some people are waiting 3-6 months to get a passport. And so, think about the 69 million American women who married and took their husband’s name, you can no longer vote under the #SAVEAct…and in order to have housing for young people who…don’t see home ownership as being something that they can achieve, he’s going to hold women who are married and took their husband’s name hostage.” 🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

1,109,063 views • 2 months ago

A birth certificate AND your marriage license. If you changed your name after you got married, like the First Lady, the 'SAVE America Act' will demand you provide BOTH documents in order to prove your identity and vote in the next election if you don’t have a passport.

A birth certificate AND your marriage license. If you changed your name after you got married, like the First Lady, the 'SAVE America Act' will demand you provide BOTH documents in order to prove your identity and vote in the next election if you don’t have a passport.

Senator Adam Schiff

644,157 views • 5 months ago

I oppose the SAVE Act, a bill where if you have changed your name or do not have a passport you may be turned away from voting. This bill will make it harder for the 80% of married women who have changed their name, and the 60% of Michiganders who don't have a passport to vote.

I oppose the SAVE Act, a bill where if you have changed your name or do not have a passport you may be turned away from voting. This bill will make it harder for the 80% of married women who have changed their name, and the 60% of Michiganders who don't have a passport to vote.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin

737,773 views • 1 year ago

Congress must pass the SAVE Act to stop noncitizens from voting in November To do that, we must attach it to the spending bill The House will be voting on the spending bill—with the SAVE Act attached—on Wednesday Share if you agree—and tell your reps to #PassTheSAVEAct

Congress must pass the SAVE Act to stop noncitizens from voting in November To do that, we must attach it to the spending bill The House will be voting on the spending bill—with the SAVE Act attached—on Wednesday Share if you agree—and tell your reps to #PassTheSAVEAct

Mike Lee

12,583,530 views • 1 year ago

.Scott Jennings on the left saying the administration is trying to stop “people” from voting... “What people? You say they don’t want people to vote? What?” “What evidence do you possibly have for that?” “The President does better in higher turnout environments. You know that, right?” “So, A, Trump and his coalition do better in higher turnout environments.” “The point is, if turnout were higher, his party would do better. [Georgetown constitutional law professor Michele Goodwin] is arguing erroneously, without any evidence, in a reckless fashion on this network that, somehow, the President of the United States is trying to stop people from voting. There is no evidence of that whatsoever.” “The only people they care about are people who shouldn’t be on the voter rolls, like illegal aliens, or people who aren’t eligible to vote, and the problem with the mail-in ballots, which are inherently less secure than voting in person, is that in a lot of states, they don't clean up their voting rolls, and they send out millions of mail-in ballots to people, whether they ask for them or not, and many addresses get multiple ballots, and there’s a lot of live ballots out on the street. These states refuse to clean up their voter rolls. That's absolutely true, and you have to ask yourself, why would you want fraudulent registrations on your voter rolls? Why would you fight that?” “He wants people who are legally eligible American citizens to vote and not have their votes diluted by people who are ineligible or illegal.”

.Scott Jennings on the left saying the administration is trying to stop “people” from voting... “What people? You say they don’t want people to vote? What?” “What evidence do you possibly have for that?” “The President does better in higher turnout environments. You know that, right?” “So, A, Trump and his coalition do better in higher turnout environments.” “The point is, if turnout were higher, his party would do better. [Georgetown constitutional law professor Michele Goodwin] is arguing erroneously, without any evidence, in a reckless fashion on this network that, somehow, the President of the United States is trying to stop people from voting. There is no evidence of that whatsoever.” “The only people they care about are people who shouldn’t be on the voter rolls, like illegal aliens, or people who aren’t eligible to vote, and the problem with the mail-in ballots, which are inherently less secure than voting in person, is that in a lot of states, they don't clean up their voting rolls, and they send out millions of mail-in ballots to people, whether they ask for them or not, and many addresses get multiple ballots, and there’s a lot of live ballots out on the street. These states refuse to clean up their voter rolls. That's absolutely true, and you have to ask yourself, why would you want fraudulent registrations on your voter rolls? Why would you fight that?” “He wants people who are legally eligible American citizens to vote and not have their votes diluted by people who are ineligible or illegal.”

Curtis Houck

102,379 views • 3 days ago

Kamala Harris complains that if the SAVE America Act passes, people will have to prove who they are in order to register to vote Lol SHE SAID “PROVE WHO YOU ARE” 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Kamala Harris complains that if the SAVE America Act passes, people will have to prove who they are in order to register to vote Lol SHE SAID “PROVE WHO YOU ARE” 🤣🤣🤣🤣

DFF

2,296,020 views • 21 days ago

Maddow: "Voting is the bare minimum. You don't even get to brag about that. What else are you going to do on top of voting to help bring about the outcome that you want in this election? The answer to that question is whatever you sign up to do tonight and tomorrow."

Maddow: "Voting is the bare minimum. You don't even get to brag about that. What else are you going to do on top of voting to help bring about the outcome that you want in this election? The answer to that question is whatever you sign up to do tonight and tomorrow."

Maddow Blog

221,151 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt reveals Democrat officials are now PANICKING about noncitizens on their voter rolls — a reporter just asked if the DOJ might bring PROSECUTIONS Yes! Prosecute every official allowing voter fraud! "New Jersey and this governor, the fact that she just all of a sudden decided to put out a press release saying President Trump and Republicans have been right about non-citizens on our voting rolls is not a coincidence!" "I think this governor is saying this because she realizes this administration is serious about getting to the bottom of illegal aliens voting and being on our voting rolls in our country!" "The Secretary of Homeland Security, as you know, sent a letter to several states, including New Jersey, requesting that non-citizens that are on their voter rolls need to be reported to DHS and need to be removed from those voter rolls." "So that's why all of a sudden she is speaking truth about the fact that this does take place in states across the country." "It is completely unacceptable to have non-citizens on American voter rolls voting in U.S. elections. And she says at 6,600, we suspect it's a heck of a lot more, not just in New Jersey, but in states across the country!" "The President is hell-bent on getting to the bottom of this, and it's also why we need to pass the Save America Act to ensure that only U.S. citizens are voting in U.S. elections."

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt reveals Democrat officials are now PANICKING about noncitizens on their voter rolls — a reporter just asked if the DOJ might bring PROSECUTIONS Yes! Prosecute every official allowing voter fraud! "New Jersey and this governor, the fact that she just all of a sudden decided to put out a press release saying President Trump and Republicans have been right about non-citizens on our voting rolls is not a coincidence!" "I think this governor is saying this because she realizes this administration is serious about getting to the bottom of illegal aliens voting and being on our voting rolls in our country!" "The Secretary of Homeland Security, as you know, sent a letter to several states, including New Jersey, requesting that non-citizens that are on their voter rolls need to be reported to DHS and need to be removed from those voter rolls." "So that's why all of a sudden she is speaking truth about the fact that this does take place in states across the country." "It is completely unacceptable to have non-citizens on American voter rolls voting in U.S. elections. And she says at 6,600, we suspect it's a heck of a lot more, not just in New Jersey, but in states across the country!" "The President is hell-bent on getting to the bottom of this, and it's also why we need to pass the Save America Act to ensure that only U.S. citizens are voting in U.S. elections."

Eric Daugherty

210,179 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt DEBUNKS the Democrat myth that married women won't be able vote under the SAVE America Act "There is ZERO validity to these claims" "The act does NOT prohibit anyone from voting with the exception of ILLEGAL ALIENS." "The greatest way to disenfranchise American citizens from voting in American elections is to allow illegal aliens to vote, which is what Democrats WANT to do. We see it taking place in Democrat jurisdictions at the state and local level across this country." "As far as married women who have changed their name, if they are already registered to vote, they are entirely UNAFFECTED by the act" Regarding Democrats' claims that this will disenfranchise blacks and minorities, Leavitt said "I think it's INSULTING that the Democrats are saying that there are groups of people in this country who are not smart enough to update the documentation to allow them to vote."

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt DEBUNKS the Democrat myth that married women won't be able vote under the SAVE America Act "There is ZERO validity to these claims" "The act does NOT prohibit anyone from voting with the exception of ILLEGAL ALIENS." "The greatest way to disenfranchise American citizens from voting in American elections is to allow illegal aliens to vote, which is what Democrats WANT to do. We see it taking place in Democrat jurisdictions at the state and local level across this country." "As far as married women who have changed their name, if they are already registered to vote, they are entirely UNAFFECTED by the act" Regarding Democrats' claims that this will disenfranchise blacks and minorities, Leavitt said "I think it's INSULTING that the Democrats are saying that there are groups of people in this country who are not smart enough to update the documentation to allow them to vote."

Nick Sortor

340,083 views • 5 months ago

Sen. Tuberville Goes BALLISTIC Lisa Murkowski for Sabotaging SAVE America Act: 'She Just HATES Trump!' "She does not like President Trump and she's not going to vote for it because he wants it." "People in Alaska want voter ID. They have voter ID in Alaska. And so the people that are voting against the SAVE America Act do not like the president of the United States."

Sen. Tuberville Goes BALLISTIC Lisa Murkowski for Sabotaging SAVE America Act: 'She Just HATES Trump!' "She does not like President Trump and she's not going to vote for it because he wants it." "People in Alaska want voter ID. They have voter ID in Alaska. And so the people that are voting against the SAVE America Act do not like the president of the United States."

Benny Johnson

172,010 views • 1 month ago

Taking Your Birth Certificate to Court The courts only want to charge some bogus bonds to your federal account, and they need your bond or permission to do the discharge. Otherwise you must pay a fine and go to jail. But they neglected to tell us that the birth certificate is the bond. And the birth certificate is proof that we are the beneficiary and not the trustee of our strawman trust account. The state is the trustee. Everything including crime and taxes is already pre-paid through that birth certificate bond. In every case so far, the charges were settled and they let the fellow go without a record of crime by surrendering the birth certificate. Further, the birth certificate proves that you are the beneficiary of your strawman estate. The prosecutor is claiming that he represents the beneficiary (the state) when the state is really suppose to be the trustee. So when you bring the birth certificate into court, you discharge all of the charges against you. And you prove that you are the beneficiary of your trust estate. And this completely shuts the prosecutor down. The prosecutor now has no standing. You bringing in the birth certificate proves that he has brought fraud into the court by claiming to be the beneficiary instead of you. Only the beneficiary (YOU) can be the plaintiff. And only the trustee (the state) can be the defendant. I do not give legal advice, but this is what I would do if I were in your shoes….

Taking Your Birth Certificate to Court The courts only want to charge some bogus bonds to your federal account, and they need your bond or permission to do the discharge. Otherwise you must pay a fine and go to jail. But they neglected to tell us that the birth certificate is the bond. And the birth certificate is proof that we are the beneficiary and not the trustee of our strawman trust account. The state is the trustee. Everything including crime and taxes is already pre-paid through that birth certificate bond. In every case so far, the charges were settled and they let the fellow go without a record of crime by surrendering the birth certificate. Further, the birth certificate proves that you are the beneficiary of your strawman estate. The prosecutor is claiming that he represents the beneficiary (the state) when the state is really suppose to be the trustee. So when you bring the birth certificate into court, you discharge all of the charges against you. And you prove that you are the beneficiary of your trust estate. And this completely shuts the prosecutor down. The prosecutor now has no standing. You bringing in the birth certificate proves that he has brought fraud into the court by claiming to be the beneficiary instead of you. Only the beneficiary (YOU) can be the plaintiff. And only the trustee (the state) can be the defendant. I do not give legal advice, but this is what I would do if I were in your shoes….

Joey dark 2 Light

34,440 views • 6 months ago

California's Wealth Tax Has a Secret Prohibition On Founder Control That's Forcing Entrepreneurs Out Sacks: “Larry and Sergey have left the state, and they’re probably getting dragged for that, but one of the reasons they have to is because of the super-voting stock provision in this thing.” “The way they calculate the value of your stock isn’t based on its liquid market value, but if you own super-voting shares, they multiply your ownership, your super voting, by the market cap of the company, and they deem your shares be worth that.” How it works: – Larry and Sergey have a combined 52% voting share of Google, which is worth $4T – They would be deemed to be worth roughly $1T each, not the ~$200B they are actually worth – So a 5% tax for them is more like a 25% tax on their entire net worth Chamath: “It actually becomes closer to 50%, because you'd have to sell more than that to overcome the drag of selling to generate $25B or $50B of net worth.” “You have to sell two times that, because you have to pay taxes on that.” Sacks: “So what’s the point of having that super-voting provision in there?” “It’s just totally punitive and vicious.”

California's Wealth Tax Has a Secret Prohibition On Founder Control That's Forcing Entrepreneurs Out Sacks: “Larry and Sergey have left the state, and they’re probably getting dragged for that, but one of the reasons they have to is because of the super-voting stock provision in this thing.” “The way they calculate the value of your stock isn’t based on its liquid market value, but if you own super-voting shares, they multiply your ownership, your super voting, by the market cap of the company, and they deem your shares be worth that.” How it works: – Larry and Sergey have a combined 52% voting share of Google, which is worth $4T – They would be deemed to be worth roughly $1T each, not the ~$200B they are actually worth – So a 5% tax for them is more like a 25% tax on their entire net worth Chamath: “It actually becomes closer to 50%, because you'd have to sell more than that to overcome the drag of selling to generate $25B or $50B of net worth.” “You have to sell two times that, because you have to pay taxes on that.” Sacks: “So what’s the point of having that super-voting provision in there?” “It’s just totally punitive and vicious.”

The All-In Podcast

155,130 views • 7 months ago