Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Stephen Meyer describes how developmental gene regulatory networks have “programming” to stop evolution from taking place. Darwin is done. Scientists are starting to learn it was all BS.

54,840 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля David Montaigne
David Montaigne1 год назад

Damn, getting more popular congrats!

Фото профиля Lebanon_John
Lebanon_John1 год назад

Absolutely!!! Darwin was always an atheist cope! I highly recommend "divine name verification" Genius book that totally destroys Darwin

Фото профиля 𝓂𝒶𝓉𝓉𝒽ℯ𝓌
𝓂𝒶𝓉𝓉𝒽ℯ𝓌1 год назад

So agree with you

Фото профиля Michael S Jones
Michael S Jones1 год назад

Great find. Fascinating bit.

Фото профиля ✨Payton Kelly🇺🇸✨
✨Payton Kelly🇺🇸✨1 год назад

Isn’t that cool? 🤯

Фото профиля Michele Ermacora
Michele Ermacora1 год назад

@ExcclesiaLatin Darwin's theory of evolution has never been accepted as true; it has always been just a theory. True genetic science has always known this.

Фото профиля Fred Vision
Fred Vision1 год назад

Stupid people look for reasons to put others down so they can elevate themselves, rather than achieve something of their own. This girl is obviously extremely stupid and has zero going for her, so she latched onto a dumb theory which will "make: her part of a Master Race 🫤🤣

Фото профиля Green Thumb
Green Thumb1 год назад

This is a bastardization of the science involved. Just like the "irreducibly complex" argument. Incremental changes wouldn't cause disastrous results. Over time enough of those add up and the systems diverge. Evolution isn't your enemy. God could have created it.

Фото профиля ✨Payton Kelly🇺🇸✨
✨Payton Kelly🇺🇸✨1 год назад

I used to think maybe God created evolution until I started researching it and realized there’s very little evidence to back it

Фото профиля ed
ed1 год назад

You should definitely win the Darwin award this year. I think you're the champ. How do we make it happen?

Похожие видео

Stephen Meyer just exposed one of the dirtiest secrets of modern science. We’re constantly told: “Trust the science.” “The scientific consensus says…” But scientists are only exposing themselves when they say things like that, according to Meyer. “When scientists appeal to consensus, almost invariably, there isn’t one.” “You only appeal to consensus to shut down dissenting opinions.” “If there really is a consensus, you don’t need to appeal to one.” “Scientists never say: the consensus is that the formula for water is H2O.” “They only appeal to consensus when there’s actual debate, and they want to shut down a dissenting group of scientists who hold a different opinion.” “We’ve had this move made or applied against us numerous times.” “Proponents of intelligent design, or critics of Darwinian evolution or neo-Darwinian evolution will be told: this is settled science, and to challenge it is pseudoscience.” “When there’s an appeal to consensus… it’s usually a rhetorical ploy to silence an alternative perspective or a group of dissenting scientists.” “And this is actually ironically profoundly unscientific behavior.” “If there’s no serious dissent, you don’t need to appeal to consensus.” “When people appeal to settled science or consensus, it’s often a tell that there’s subterranean dissent that needs to be heard.” Stay tuned for my full interview with Stephen C. Meyer—coming this Saturday at 5PM ET!

Jan Jekielek

11,823 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад