Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Steven A. Smith: “This is not about being anti-anything. This is about being pro-girls, pro-females, pro-women, pro-ladies. That’s what this is about. You can’t be a male born a male transitioning to female and think that you should have the right to compete with women. Not in basketball, not... show more

jay plemons

53,330 subscribers

36,084 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Sports

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Stephen A. Smith GOES OFF on WNBA coach’s “Trans kids belong” t-shirt. “That is an IRRESPONSIBLE thing to do!” SMITH: “This is not about being anti-anything. This is about being PRO-GIRLS... You can’t be born a male, transition into female and think that you should have the right to compete with women!" “Not in basketball, not in football, not in boxing, not in the UFC. Hell, not even in tennis! “It’s an aberration (anomaly) when you find somebody like a Serena Williams serving 120 miles, 125 miles an hour. That’s ORDINARY for Djokovic... That was ordinary for Sampras, Agassi, and all of these guys." “We gotta stop acting like somebody that’s speaking up on behalf of girls, like a Sophie Cunningham, like a Riley Gaines, are scourges of the earth." "You are Cheryl Reeve, the head coach of the Minnesota Lynx. That is an irresponsible thing to do... Do you not think that the females are being SCREWED OVER if they have to compete against an individual born as a male? What are you talking about?!" “Nobody said you can't transition from male to female. The issue here is competing against the women. That’s what Sophie Cunningham was talking about. That’s what Riley Gaines is talking about. How are you, Coach Cheryl Reeve, and you could condone that, and then you gonna come out with a T-shirt?" “No regard for the WNBA, no regard for the sponsors that may be put off by that. No regard for the bottom line that might be affected because of a position that she has taken that YOU KNOW is going to be politicized because that’s what you did.” “How is that okay? How?!”

Stephen A. Smith GOES OFF on WNBA coach’s “Trans kids belong” t-shirt. “That is an IRRESPONSIBLE thing to do!” SMITH: “This is not about being anti-anything. This is about being PRO-GIRLS... You can’t be born a male, transition into female and think that you should have the right to compete with women!" “Not in basketball, not in football, not in boxing, not in the UFC. Hell, not even in tennis! “It’s an aberration (anomaly) when you find somebody like a Serena Williams serving 120 miles, 125 miles an hour. That’s ORDINARY for Djokovic... That was ordinary for Sampras, Agassi, and all of these guys." “We gotta stop acting like somebody that’s speaking up on behalf of girls, like a Sophie Cunningham, like a Riley Gaines, are scourges of the earth." "You are Cheryl Reeve, the head coach of the Minnesota Lynx. That is an irresponsible thing to do... Do you not think that the females are being SCREWED OVER if they have to compete against an individual born as a male? What are you talking about?!" “Nobody said you can't transition from male to female. The issue here is competing against the women. That’s what Sophie Cunningham was talking about. That’s what Riley Gaines is talking about. How are you, Coach Cheryl Reeve, and you could condone that, and then you gonna come out with a T-shirt?" “No regard for the WNBA, no regard for the sponsors that may be put off by that. No regard for the bottom line that might be affected because of a position that she has taken that YOU KNOW is going to be politicized because that’s what you did.” “How is that okay? How?!”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

337,388 views • 1 day ago

Sadie’s response to Boston University Boston University after being banned from competing in WOMEN’S track and field: “They are hearing I was assigned male at birth and that is enough for them to ban any athlete.” “If you don’t conform to what they think is a female athlete, they are not going to let you compete.” Young girls and women should not have to compete against biological boys and men in sports, it’s not complicated.

Sadie’s response to Boston University Boston University after being banned from competing in WOMEN’S track and field: “They are hearing I was assigned male at birth and that is enough for them to ban any athlete.” “If you don’t conform to what they think is a female athlete, they are not going to let you compete.” Young girls and women should not have to compete against biological boys and men in sports, it’s not complicated.

Gays Against Groomers

74,062 views • 3 months ago

Stephen A. Smith: "[Gavin Newsom] is talking about how he's in support of somebody transitioning from male to female being able to do so, not necessarily with parental consent. What!? What the h*ll do you mean without parental consent?"

Stephen A. Smith: "[Gavin Newsom] is talking about how he's in support of somebody transitioning from male to female being able to do so, not necessarily with parental consent. What!? What the h*ll do you mean without parental consent?"

Thomas Sowell Quotes

98,525 views • 5 months ago

Stephen A. Smith tells Riley Gaines he agrees with her… That men transitioning to women SHOULD NOT compete in women’s sports.

Stephen A. Smith tells Riley Gaines he agrees with her… That men transitioning to women SHOULD NOT compete in women’s sports.

OutKick

29,686 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Women’s sports are for women. A biological male just dominated a women’s track and field event, while young women are left paying the price, losing records, opportunities, scholarships, and the fair playing field they earned. This is not compassion. This is not progress. This is common sense being sacrificed on the altar of radical ideology. California’s leaders should be protecting girls, not forcing them to compete in a system rigged against them. Protect women’s sports, Governor.

🚨 Women’s sports are for women. A biological male just dominated a women’s track and field event, while young women are left paying the price, losing records, opportunities, scholarships, and the fair playing field they earned. This is not compassion. This is not progress. This is common sense being sacrificed on the altar of radical ideology. California’s leaders should be protecting girls, not forcing them to compete in a system rigged against them. Protect women’s sports, Governor.

Rep. Wesley Hunt Press Office

80,920 views • 2 months ago

Nasiru you should bury your head in shame Even if people want to talk about the negative side of extreme tribalism not you You are a bigot,Full of hate and bias against Yoruba women Tribalism is loyalty,so in itself not a bad thing This is you here insulting Yoruba women , Lastly there is no ethnicity like South South

Nasiru you should bury your head in shame Even if people want to talk about the negative side of extreme tribalism not you You are a bigot,Full of hate and bias against Yoruba women Tribalism is loyalty,so in itself not a bad thing This is you here insulting Yoruba women , Lastly there is no ethnicity like South South

Ọgbeni Bosun

56,991 views • 4 months ago

Bill Maher: “The Olympics have said they are not allowing tr*ns women to compete in women’s sports anymore.” Stephen A. Smith: “Biological men should not be competing against biological girls in sports, period.”

Bill Maher: “The Olympics have said they are not allowing tr*ns women to compete in women’s sports anymore.” Stephen A. Smith: “Biological men should not be competing against biological girls in sports, period.”

Defiant L’s

56,728 views • 4 months ago

if you meet women a lot, if you work in a career where you get to deal with women, This is the first thing that’s going to happen to you! Women are not as inn0cent as you think.

if you meet women a lot, if you work in a career where you get to deal with women, This is the first thing that’s going to happen to you! Women are not as inn0cent as you think.

CHIGO

26,495 views • 4 months ago

Women are not punchlines. Misogyny is not mass politics. Vulgarity is not leadership. What exactly are you teaching the next generation about how women should be spoken about? Udhay 🤡 #ஆபாசநிதி

Women are not punchlines. Misogyny is not mass politics. Vulgarity is not leadership. What exactly are you teaching the next generation about how women should be spoken about? Udhay 🤡 #ஆபாசநிதி

Vijay Fans Trends

24,703 views • 2 days ago

🤦‍♂️ CAR CRASH Interview: Hackney Green Mayor Zoe Garbett’s excruciating, slippery dance around one simple question about women. Stig Abell: “There’s law that says women should be able to have access to spaces that biological men cannot. That is now a right that is enshrined in law. When you say that trans women should be allowed into there, you are competing against that right?” Zoe deflects to EHRC guidance and claims many organisations say third spaces for trans people is against their human rights and Equality Act. Stig rightly jumps in and says: “The Supreme Court ruling, is the Supreme Court ruling. It’s called the Supreme Court for a reason. As Hackney mayor you can’t do anything about that can you? Are you saying that trans women should have access to women only spaces in Hackney?” She completely ignores it: “What we need to talk is how people are living their everyday lives” and how she’s “talking to trans legal clinic and other organisations to make sure the rights of trans people aren’t being excluded from public life.” Stig, frustrated: “So do you want trans women to access women’s spaces in Hackney? You would like that to happen?” Zoe dodges again: “I deeply care about the safety of women in Hackney. I’ve made this a priority. Domestic violence in this country needs to be seriously looked at. This whole conversation is completely ignoring the fact that women are most under threat from a domestic partner.” Stig interrupts again: “We have regular conversations about domestic violence but my question is a different one. Would you like there to be in Hackney the fact that trans women can enter women only spaces?” Finally she admits it: “I think its about what we’re talking about in terms of women only spaces, like trans women for me should have the right to access women’s spaces, they are women.” Stig puts her right: “Well they’re not according to the law. That’s precisely what the Supreme Court’s saying they’re not. They’re not biological women.” Zoe: “But this is why we need to look at what spaces we’re talking about.” Stig, losing patience, again cuts her off: “It might be changing rooms, it might be refuges, places where women want to be away from men. The law says that trans women are not allowed there and I think you’re saying you wouldn’t want to uphold that law?” Zoe in full denial: “But trans women are women and they face higher risks of sexual violence.” Stig, not letting her off the hook: “But they’re not women according to the Supreme Court?” Zoe freezes for a second, then says: “But then I think that’s where we have a problem and we’ll continue to see that challenged because if we want to keep women safe then this ruling doesnt do that.” She says keeping biological men out of women’s spaces makes women less safe. She “deeply cares about the safety of women” and prioritises domestic violence, yet wants men in women’s refuges. She talks endlessly about helping women while completely ignoring women’s rights in favour of a minority of men. Absolutely exhausting ideological contortions. One straight question took Herculean effort to get a straight(ish) answer. This is what woke governance looks like, slippery, evasive, and dangerous for actual women. Stig deserves a medal for persisting. Most just let them spout their soundbites. Hackney, this is your mayor. 😵‍💫

🤦‍♂️ CAR CRASH Interview: Hackney Green Mayor Zoe Garbett’s excruciating, slippery dance around one simple question about women. Stig Abell: “There’s law that says women should be able to have access to spaces that biological men cannot. That is now a right that is enshrined in law. When you say that trans women should be allowed into there, you are competing against that right?” Zoe deflects to EHRC guidance and claims many organisations say third spaces for trans people is against their human rights and Equality Act. Stig rightly jumps in and says: “The Supreme Court ruling, is the Supreme Court ruling. It’s called the Supreme Court for a reason. As Hackney mayor you can’t do anything about that can you? Are you saying that trans women should have access to women only spaces in Hackney?” She completely ignores it: “What we need to talk is how people are living their everyday lives” and how she’s “talking to trans legal clinic and other organisations to make sure the rights of trans people aren’t being excluded from public life.” Stig, frustrated: “So do you want trans women to access women’s spaces in Hackney? You would like that to happen?” Zoe dodges again: “I deeply care about the safety of women in Hackney. I’ve made this a priority. Domestic violence in this country needs to be seriously looked at. This whole conversation is completely ignoring the fact that women are most under threat from a domestic partner.” Stig interrupts again: “We have regular conversations about domestic violence but my question is a different one. Would you like there to be in Hackney the fact that trans women can enter women only spaces?” Finally she admits it: “I think its about what we’re talking about in terms of women only spaces, like trans women for me should have the right to access women’s spaces, they are women.” Stig puts her right: “Well they’re not according to the law. That’s precisely what the Supreme Court’s saying they’re not. They’re not biological women.” Zoe: “But this is why we need to look at what spaces we’re talking about.” Stig, losing patience, again cuts her off: “It might be changing rooms, it might be refuges, places where women want to be away from men. The law says that trans women are not allowed there and I think you’re saying you wouldn’t want to uphold that law?” Zoe in full denial: “But trans women are women and they face higher risks of sexual violence.” Stig, not letting her off the hook: “But they’re not women according to the Supreme Court?” Zoe freezes for a second, then says: “But then I think that’s where we have a problem and we’ll continue to see that challenged because if we want to keep women safe then this ruling doesnt do that.” She says keeping biological men out of women’s spaces makes women less safe. She “deeply cares about the safety of women” and prioritises domestic violence, yet wants men in women’s refuges. She talks endlessly about helping women while completely ignoring women’s rights in favour of a minority of men. Absolutely exhausting ideological contortions. One straight question took Herculean effort to get a straight(ish) answer. This is what woke governance looks like, slippery, evasive, and dangerous for actual women. Stig deserves a medal for persisting. Most just let them spout their soundbites. Hackney, this is your mayor. 😵‍💫

J Stewart

33,480 views • 1 month ago

Exchange of the year right here: 🔥 Kennedy: "You don't believe that a biological male has a physical advantage in sports over a biological female?" Science denier: "Not as a definitive statement." Kennedy: "How many female members of the NBA do you see?" Science denier: "Well, I can say there's been this news article about men that think they could beat Serena Williams in tennis... it's just not the case!" Riley Gaines: "Both Serena and Venus lost to the 203rd ranked male tennis player. They are phenoms for women." Trust the science! 🔥

Exchange of the year right here: 🔥 Kennedy: "You don't believe that a biological male has a physical advantage in sports over a biological female?" Science denier: "Not as a definitive statement." Kennedy: "How many female members of the NBA do you see?" Science denier: "Well, I can say there's been this news article about men that think they could beat Serena Williams in tennis... it's just not the case!" Riley Gaines: "Both Serena and Venus lost to the 203rd ranked male tennis player. They are phenoms for women." Trust the science! 🔥

Collin Rugg

5,709,058 views • 3 years ago

Bill Maher: “The Olympics have said they are not allowing tr*ns women to compete in women’s sports anymore.” Stephen A. Smith: “Biological men SHOULD NOT be competing against biological girls in sports, period.” “What about protecting the young ladies? Young ladies going up against biological men, biological men, there is NO EXCUSE for that.” “Lia Thomas, for example, was a male, and he was ranked over 400th in the world… and then he became a she… And number 1. Well, d*mnit, does it really take an Einstein to realize that there’s something wrong with that picture?”

Bill Maher: “The Olympics have said they are not allowing trns women to compete in women’s sports anymore.” Stephen A. Smith: “Biological men SHOULD NOT be competing against biological girls in sports, period.” “What about protecting the young ladies? Young ladies going up against biological men, biological men, there is NO EXCUSE for that.” “Lia Thomas, for example, was a male, and he was ranked over 400th in the world… and then he became a she… And number 1. Well, dmnit, does it really take an Einstein to realize that there’s something wrong with that picture?”

RedWave Press

596,440 views • 4 months ago

Epstein survivor: “This is not a partisan issue... This is a crime that has 1000 victims…. Could you be ok with a crime happening in your community to a thousand girls and young women and not holding the perpetrators accountable? I think not.”

Epstein survivor: “This is not a partisan issue... This is a crime that has 1000 victims…. Could you be ok with a crime happening in your community to a thousand girls and young women and not holding the perpetrators accountable? I think not.”

Jesus Freakin Congress

27,159 views • 11 months ago

Julie Hamill just flawlessly shut down and humiliated a CNN anchor labeling male athlete AB Hernandez as a woman: CNN: “For her to compete for those who are competing against her. What, what would that kind of structure in competition look like?” HAMILL: “Who is her?” CNN: “AB” HAMILL: “Okay. A.B. hernandez is a male who identifies as a female. What would be fair is to have Hernandez competing in the male category. It is not fair to the females competing to compete with a male.”

Julie Hamill just flawlessly shut down and humiliated a CNN anchor labeling male athlete AB Hernandez as a woman: CNN: “For her to compete for those who are competing against her. What, what would that kind of structure in competition look like?” HAMILL: “Who is her?” CNN: “AB” HAMILL: “Okay. A.B. hernandez is a male who identifies as a female. What would be fair is to have Hernandez competing in the male category. It is not fair to the females competing to compete with a male.”

Benny Johnson

396,360 views • 1 year ago

Stephen A. Smith went OFF on Minnesota Lynx head Coach Cheryl Reeve for wearing a “Trans Kids Belong” shirt before the game against the Indiana Fevers & affecting the WNBA brand after Sophie Cunningham said Trans people don’t belong in women’s sports 😳👀 “You are Cheryl Reeve, Head Coach of the Minnesota Lynx. That is an IRRESPONSIBLE thing to do. You are coach for a female basketball team. Do you not think that the females are being screwed over if they have to compete against an individual who’s born as a male. What are you talking about??… No regard for the WNBA, the sponsors who may be put off by that… HOW is that ok??”

Slime🐍

864,156 views • 1 day ago

Is this guy ok? Literally 3 women in Rivals being blacklisted RIGHT NOW, but “women in the space are never wrong and you can’t win against them?” Like no…. you were just unnecessarily vulgar and inserted yourself into a situation nobody even knew was about you?

Is this guy ok? Literally 3 women in Rivals being blacklisted RIGHT NOW, but “women in the space are never wrong and you can’t win against them?” Like no…. you were just unnecessarily vulgar and inserted yourself into a situation nobody even knew was about you?

Big Hal

25,890 views • 6 months ago

This is what the Iranian people are fighting against, but the UN and globalist world leaders try to promote into the West. In Iran, women are not allowed to sing, dance, or show their hair in public. They can’t choose their husbands, leave home without a male guardian’s permission, or receive higher education, jobs, or medical treatment without male approval. Here are videos of innocent women and girls being beaten and tortured under the Islamic regime for not wearing a hijab. Some were later imprisoned, raped, and killed. This is not culture. This is not tradition. This is pure Islamic barbarism enforced by a bloodthirsty theocratic death cult.

This is what the Iranian people are fighting against, but the UN and globalist world leaders try to promote into the West. In Iran, women are not allowed to sing, dance, or show their hair in public. They can’t choose their husbands, leave home without a male guardian’s permission, or receive higher education, jobs, or medical treatment without male approval. Here are videos of innocent women and girls being beaten and tortured under the Islamic regime for not wearing a hijab. Some were later imprisoned, raped, and killed. This is not culture. This is not tradition. This is pure Islamic barbarism enforced by a bloodthirsty theocratic death cult.

Liza Rosen

57,823 views • 2 months ago

The debate about #IstanbulConvention is not just about combating violence against women (all sane people oppose violence against women), but redefining what a woman is. According to this Convention, "gender" is not related to a biological sex anymore, but "the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for women and men". To claim that womanhood is not a reality in itself, but something so fluid, relative and uncertain so others – ie society – have to agree on what is or "considers appropriate" to be is simply absurd. If this is not the biggest threat to womanhood, then what is? Based on this aggressive gender ideology non-sense, a man can claim that he identifies as a car, and the society should give him a license plate, instead of an ID card. You can find below the exchange of views between myself and the socialist MEP Evin Incir debating this issue on May 9, 2023, in the European Parliament.

The debate about #IstanbulConvention is not just about combating violence against women (all sane people oppose violence against women), but redefining what a woman is. According to this Convention, "gender" is not related to a biological sex anymore, but "the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for women and men". To claim that womanhood is not a reality in itself, but something so fluid, relative and uncertain so others – ie society – have to agree on what is or "considers appropriate" to be is simply absurd. If this is not the biggest threat to womanhood, then what is? Based on this aggressive gender ideology non-sense, a man can claim that he identifies as a car, and the society should give him a license plate, instead of an ID card. You can find below the exchange of views between myself and the socialist MEP Evin Incir debating this issue on May 9, 2023, in the European Parliament.

Cristian Terhes MEP

49,064 views • 3 years ago

“I can define a woman… I just take an inclusive approach.” This means she includes men in her definition of women. Ffs. There is a lot to unpack in this snide & immature clip. First of all, Amanda Camm MP is correct: you cannot protect women if you can’t define them. Otherwise, who are you protecting? How are you catering to specific needs? How are you helping a woman whose protection involves single-sex care? Words only purpose is that they have objective meaning. Next, an inclusive approach to the definition of women is… only including women. That’s what inclusivity actually is. Allowing men to be classed as women simply turns the category of woman into a mixed sexed category. It dismantles the category. It’s not inclusive, it’s destructive. Then, she calls defining a woman as importing Trumpian-style politics to Australia. This is laughably stupid. Trump didn’t decide what a woman is, he acknowledged that accurately defining women in law & society was a no brainer political win & ceased upon the opportunity. If you do want to talk about importing American ideologies, that conversation will be about gender ideology. You don’t have an issue with importing problems, only the solution. Not wanting to stop with the stupidity, she then says that it’s all a distraction from the actual issue: men’s violence against women. Who and what are you talking about? If those words aren’t defined, the statement makes no sense. I’ll prove it: in the event there is male violence against men who claim to be women, that is going to be for a very different reason than men’s violence against women, requiring different plans & solutions. See, even to defend your stupid ideology it’s important to have correct definitions so everyone gets the correct help. Finally, she mocks being told it’s tokenistic to wear purple to support the “queer community”. It’s so pathetic, I’m not even going to bother commenting on it. When she was the Minister for Women, Shannon Fentiman blocked me because I said that a woman is an adult human female. She ignored pleas from me and many Queensland-based women to meet with her to discuss our opposition to self ID laws. She says she is not ashamed of her stance but she should be. She is ignoring women in favor of men, proving in actions instead of words that she knows *exactly* what a woman is.

“I can define a woman… I just take an inclusive approach.” This means she includes men in her definition of women. Ffs. There is a lot to unpack in this snide & immature clip. First of all, Amanda Camm MP is correct: you cannot protect women if you can’t define them. Otherwise, who are you protecting? How are you catering to specific needs? How are you helping a woman whose protection involves single-sex care? Words only purpose is that they have objective meaning. Next, an inclusive approach to the definition of women is… only including women. That’s what inclusivity actually is. Allowing men to be classed as women simply turns the category of woman into a mixed sexed category. It dismantles the category. It’s not inclusive, it’s destructive. Then, she calls defining a woman as importing Trumpian-style politics to Australia. This is laughably stupid. Trump didn’t decide what a woman is, he acknowledged that accurately defining women in law & society was a no brainer political win & ceased upon the opportunity. If you do want to talk about importing American ideologies, that conversation will be about gender ideology. You don’t have an issue with importing problems, only the solution. Not wanting to stop with the stupidity, she then says that it’s all a distraction from the actual issue: men’s violence against women. Who and what are you talking about? If those words aren’t defined, the statement makes no sense. I’ll prove it: in the event there is male violence against men who claim to be women, that is going to be for a very different reason than men’s violence against women, requiring different plans & solutions. See, even to defend your stupid ideology it’s important to have correct definitions so everyone gets the correct help. Finally, she mocks being told it’s tokenistic to wear purple to support the “queer community”. It’s so pathetic, I’m not even going to bother commenting on it. When she was the Minister for Women, Shannon Fentiman blocked me because I said that a woman is an adult human female. She ignored pleas from me and many Queensland-based women to meet with her to discuss our opposition to self ID laws. She says she is not ashamed of her stance but she should be. She is ignoring women in favor of men, proving in actions instead of words that she knows exactly what a woman is.

Sall Grover

40,674 views • 11 months ago