Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Still think the 4-year cycle is dead? Weeks ago I posted this: "The cycle isn't broken. Buy zone: $45-55K. Target: $120K+ in 2027." Bitcoin then: $81K. Bitcoin now: $61K. Late buyers: trapped. DCA zone: forming. Buy zone: getting closer. The chart doesn't lie. Neither does history. Same cycle. Same playbook.
55,285 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 21

The drop from $81K to $61K isn't a market failure; it's a structural necessity to wash out late-cycle leverage and transfer supply to patient accumulation desks.

The four-year cycle only looked foolproof because it perfectly aligned with massive central bank liquidity injections. Try hitting that $120K target if the risk-free rate stays above 4% for the next three years.

Getting closer to the buy zone is only useful if you have cash left to buy it with

DAILY MARKET PULSE

Yawn

But zone 55 to 58K zone save my comment

55 mi geliyor

You always post in a quantum way. Everything is possible. Then you can always point at “look what I said, follow me for more hocus-pocus”. I hate that BS. And you’re not the only one who’s so full of himself. Stay modest. Share your flaws too.

Spot on. Too many watch the daily... trade it fine. But the weekly and monthly charts are the key in understanding daily. Thanks for share.

😎

late buyers trapped. same chair.

Clearly the 4 yr cycle is broken.

Interesting take on the cycle still being intact

the chart doesn't lie, but fundamentals do

Cycle's not dead, just doing its classic shakeout. DCA and chill is the move here

Scammm

Love the confidence! It's fascinating how those cycles keep playing out. Excited to see where it all leads. Here's to smart buying strategies!

nah feels like the playbook’s just looping early this time

Youve been wrong historically, unlikely I will take your advice. 58k was the ultimate bottom

Calling a $61K buy zone after it already dropped from $81K is just timing a dip with a lag—real edge is knowing why the structure actually holds.

Ja
