正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Still waiting on the “It was a 🔫 Crowd” to explain how this ‘reverberating shockwave feature’ (with debris!) fits their 🔫 shot narrative. The ONLY proof of a shot thus far is the audible sound played over the loud speakers since there is not a single video - anywhere... of a person with a rifle. *If there is a bullet in the autopsy report, then someone shot Charlie AFTER he left UVU. Facts that support a detonation from under his shirt… 1. Everyone (Security/Staff/Hibbs) is eyeing the triggerman (still unidentified) working for the Tour. 2. Hunter Kozac signaled to him that the trigger question was next. 3. UVU won’t release security video from under the tunnel that recorded this in it’s entirety. 4. CK’s shirt moves first from underneath and the necklace is busting away from his body before any wound is present - this is completely out of order for a 🔫 wound. 5. The team is illegally searching for & cleaning up debris in the grass prior to the FBIs arrival- this is bc debris is seen exploding away from Charlie and they can’t afford for that to be collected as evidence. 6. UVU remodeled & covered up the crime scene 4 days after CK’s death so there wouldn’t be any leftover traces for the FBI or ATF to investigate an explosion. It’s plain as day.show more

Blake

69,467 subscribers

48,070 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is a Charlie Kirk video mostly unseen in public. It was taken by Just Phil Lyman and he has kindly granted permission to release it for investigative purposes. 👍 Timestamp was 12:04pm, most of the people in red are volunteers from the UVU chapter. There are a few known TPUSA staff members and security guys to take note of. The photographers, videographers and content creators from UVU review working in the background. The vehicle still moving at left of frame is the one trailing Charlie when he arrives. Butch Hibbs is just hanging off in the fringes again. For a short video there's a lot to unpack, You can add this one to the archives.

This is a Charlie Kirk video mostly unseen in public. It was taken by Just Phil Lyman and he has kindly granted permission to release it for investigative purposes. 👍 Timestamp was 12:04pm, most of the people in red are volunteers from the UVU chapter. There are a few known TPUSA staff members and security guys to take note of. The photographers, videographers and content creators from UVU review working in the background. The vehicle still moving at left of frame is the one trailing Charlie when he arrives. Butch Hibbs is just hanging off in the fringes again. For a short video there's a lot to unpack, You can add this one to the archives.

Muppet Masher

22,355 次观看 • 3 个月前

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

Johnny St.Pete

77,483 次观看 • 9 个月前

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

146,753 次观看 • 10 个月前

This clip slowed down shows the energy released from under Charlie's shirt BEFORE the damage to his neck. Since the very beginning, the way his shirt to me did not in any way match what would happen being shot with a bullet. This is why the shaped charge theory has legs. It completely fits what happens under his shirt and that is before you dig into the plant in Tennesee that exploding a month later killing 16 people.

This clip slowed down shows the energy released from under Charlie's shirt BEFORE the damage to his neck. Since the very beginning, the way his shirt to me did not in any way match what would happen being shot with a bullet. This is why the shaped charge theory has legs. It completely fits what happens under his shirt and that is before you dig into the plant in Tennesee that exploding a month later killing 16 people.

AmericaOnlyBro

239,441 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: New footage from the Charlie Kirk assassination has surfaced, and it confirms our worst fears. In the raw video from September 10th at UVU, a voice is clearly heard yelling “STAY DOWN!” a full 3 seconds before the fatal shot is fired. This wasn’t a panicked cry from the crowd. This was a command. A warning. Someone had foreknowledge of the attack. Who was that voice yelling to? Was it a spotter for the shooter? A handler coordinating the hit? This reeks of a coordinated assassination, not a lone wolf attack. The truth will come out. #CharlieKirk #Assassination #UVU #Truth

🚨 BREAKING: New footage from the Charlie Kirk assassination has surfaced, and it confirms our worst fears. In the raw video from September 10th at UVU, a voice is clearly heard yelling “STAY DOWN!” a full 3 seconds before the fatal shot is fired. This wasn’t a panicked cry from the crowd. This was a command. A warning. Someone had foreknowledge of the attack. Who was that voice yelling to? Was it a spotter for the shooter? A handler coordinating the hit? This reeks of a coordinated assassination, not a lone wolf attack. The truth will come out. #CharlieKirk #Assassination #UVU #Truth

Freed Ninja

121,479 次观看 • 10 个月前

This is important. Someone in the crowd confessed to the shooting immediately after it happened, despite not having a weapon? Why? Does this mean they were a decoy, and this was a joint operation? They have now apprehended multiple people, yet the shooter is still at large. An eyewitness claims that the shot was fired immediately after someone asked Charlie Kirk about trans violence and that he believes there were several people in on it. Did they wait for this specific question? The FBI and Kash Patel need to get to the bottom of this horrific crime as soon as possible. They cannot be allowed to get away with this.

This is important. Someone in the crowd confessed to the shooting immediately after it happened, despite not having a weapon? Why? Does this mean they were a decoy, and this was a joint operation? They have now apprehended multiple people, yet the shooter is still at large. An eyewitness claims that the shot was fired immediately after someone asked Charlie Kirk about trans violence and that he believes there were several people in on it. Did they wait for this specific question? The FBI and Kash Patel need to get to the bottom of this horrific crime as soon as possible. They cannot be allowed to get away with this.

Green Lives Matter

713,627 次观看 • 11 个月前

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves

Owen Benjamin 🐻

72,329 次观看 • 1 个月前

Peskov: Russia's not going to provide any evidence of an attack ok Putin's residence that we made up. [Q]: "Could you tell us whether there is, so to speak, any tangible evidence of this attempted attack on the presidential residence, and whether Russia intends to present it? For example, debris from drones that were shot down?" [Peskov]: "I don’t think any evidence is required here if such a massive drone attack was carried out and, thanks to the well-coordinated work of air defense, the drones were shot down and neutralized. As for debris, I can’t comment on that - this is, naturally, a matter for our military. What I do know is that we see Zelenskyy himself trying to deny it, and many Western media outlets, playing along with the Kyiv regime, are beginning to push the narrative that this supposedly never happened. But that is an absolutely absurd claim."

Peskov: Russia's not going to provide any evidence of an attack ok Putin's residence that we made up. [Q]: "Could you tell us whether there is, so to speak, any tangible evidence of this attempted attack on the presidential residence, and whether Russia intends to present it? For example, debris from drones that were shot down?" [Peskov]: "I don’t think any evidence is required here if such a massive drone attack was carried out and, thanks to the well-coordinated work of air defense, the drones were shot down and neutralized. As for debris, I can’t comment on that - this is, naturally, a matter for our military. What I do know is that we see Zelenskyy himself trying to deny it, and many Western media outlets, playing along with the Kyiv regime, are beginning to push the narrative that this supposedly never happened. But that is an absolutely absurd claim."

Anton Gerashchenko

368,647 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨SHOCKING: Jesse On Fire Just VALIDATED The PETN Shirt EXPLOSION Thesis—The "LONE SHOOTER" Narrative Is Officially DEAD. 🎤💥 Jesse On Fire just dedicated a massive segment to covering our investigation into the explosive device hidden under Charlie Kirk's shirt. While Jesse and I fundamentally disagree on the ultimate conclusion (he believes Charlie is alive and in hiding; I am adamant that Charlie is dead), we are now 100% aligned on the mechanics of what actually happened on that stage. If you look at the footage Jesse broke down from our findings, the official "lone shooter from the Losee building with a 30-06" narrative is completely destroyed. Here is what everyone is finally waking up to: 1. THE COMPRESSED AIR & THE SHIRT PUFF If you watch the footage in slow motion, right before the chaos starts, there is a massive, unnatural puff of air that forcefully escapes from underneath Charlie's shirt collar and sleeve. A distant rifle round does not cause a localized, pressurized puff of air from underneath a garment before the impact is even visible. That is the unmistakable signature of energy being released from a small, localized detonation—specifically, a micro-explosive device (like PETN) triggered from within his own equipment. 2. THE CORD AND THE CONTRAMPTION Jesse highlighted that there is a visible hose/wire running up Charlie’s back, connecting directly to the area where the explosion occurs. The location of the blast lines exactly up with where his mic receiver was clipped onto his belt on his left side. 3. CANDACE'S DREAM AND "THE LEFT" This all ties back to the chilling detail Candace Owens revealed about her vivid dream. In the dream, Charlie told her: "They are hiding what happened to my left." What was on his left? The mic receiver. The exact location of the localized explosion that took his life. 4. THE SECURITY TEAM ANOMALIES Jesse pointed out the glaring anomalies with the security team that we have been screaming about for weeks: Why was the security team receiving signals right before it happened? Why did his Chief of Staff (Mikey McCoy) and others immediately walk away before the chaos even registered? Why was there a total lack of blood on the hands, clothes, and shoes of the security team who supposedly jumped on top of a man bleeding out from a catastrophic neck wound? THE BOTTOM LINE Whether you believe Charlie is alive (like Jesse) or dead (like me), the physical evidence on that stage proves one undeniable fact: Charlie Kirk was not shot by a distant sniper. using a 30.06 round. He was taken out by a localized explosive device planted in his own equipment, and the people closest to him knew it was coming. The entire federal narrative is a fabricated cover-up. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 and watch his FULL video below. 👇

🚨SHOCKING: Jesse On Fire Just VALIDATED The PETN Shirt EXPLOSION Thesis—The "LONE SHOOTER" Narrative Is Officially DEAD. 🎤💥 Jesse On Fire just dedicated a massive segment to covering our investigation into the explosive device hidden under Charlie Kirk's shirt. While Jesse and I fundamentally disagree on the ultimate conclusion (he believes Charlie is alive and in hiding; I am adamant that Charlie is dead), we are now 100% aligned on the mechanics of what actually happened on that stage. If you look at the footage Jesse broke down from our findings, the official "lone shooter from the Losee building with a 30-06" narrative is completely destroyed. Here is what everyone is finally waking up to: 1. THE COMPRESSED AIR & THE SHIRT PUFF If you watch the footage in slow motion, right before the chaos starts, there is a massive, unnatural puff of air that forcefully escapes from underneath Charlie's shirt collar and sleeve. A distant rifle round does not cause a localized, pressurized puff of air from underneath a garment before the impact is even visible. That is the unmistakable signature of energy being released from a small, localized detonation—specifically, a micro-explosive device (like PETN) triggered from within his own equipment. 2. THE CORD AND THE CONTRAMPTION Jesse highlighted that there is a visible hose/wire running up Charlie’s back, connecting directly to the area where the explosion occurs. The location of the blast lines exactly up with where his mic receiver was clipped onto his belt on his left side. 3. CANDACE'S DREAM AND "THE LEFT" This all ties back to the chilling detail Candace Owens revealed about her vivid dream. In the dream, Charlie told her: "They are hiding what happened to my left." What was on his left? The mic receiver. The exact location of the localized explosion that took his life. 4. THE SECURITY TEAM ANOMALIES Jesse pointed out the glaring anomalies with the security team that we have been screaming about for weeks: Why was the security team receiving signals right before it happened? Why did his Chief of Staff (Mikey McCoy) and others immediately walk away before the chaos even registered? Why was there a total lack of blood on the hands, clothes, and shoes of the security team who supposedly jumped on top of a man bleeding out from a catastrophic neck wound? THE BOTTOM LINE Whether you believe Charlie is alive (like Jesse) or dead (like me), the physical evidence on that stage proves one undeniable fact: Charlie Kirk was not shot by a distant sniper. using a 30.06 round. He was taken out by a localized explosive device planted in his own equipment, and the people closest to him knew it was coming. The entire federal narrative is a fabricated cover-up. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 and watch his FULL video below. 👇

Project Constitution

32,087 次观看 • 5 个月前

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

frances 🏒

294,736 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨THE SHOOTER WAS MUCH CLOSER - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE CROWD 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “It is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day, maybe even deciding in the last hour which one of them would take the shot.” “It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun… which had to come from the front of Charlie.” “We are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie, and likely in the audience.” “That goes a long way in explaining why they’re hiding the footage from behind Charlie’s head.” “Of all the cameras, why grab that one first?” “There’s a lot of hiding and definitively a lot of lying going on.”

🚨THE SHOOTER WAS MUCH CLOSER - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE CROWD 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “It is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day, maybe even deciding in the last hour which one of them would take the shot.” “It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun… which had to come from the front of Charlie.” “We are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie, and likely in the audience.” “That goes a long way in explaining why they’re hiding the footage from behind Charlie’s head.” “Of all the cameras, why grab that one first?” “There’s a lot of hiding and definitively a lot of lying going on.”

HustleBitch

101,606 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 WATCH CLOSELY - IS THIS HIM? 🚨 Candace Owens put out an alert for “an older male with long hair, up in a ponytail or bun” seen at UVU the day Charlie Kirk was killed. “There is, of course, a specific reason why I’m asking for that” Candace said. Watch carefully as a man matching that description appears in the crowd, repeatedly checking his phone just before Charlie begins speaking. Is this the man Candace Owens is looking for?

🚨 WATCH CLOSELY - IS THIS HIM? 🚨 Candace Owens put out an alert for “an older male with long hair, up in a ponytail or bun” seen at UVU the day Charlie Kirk was killed. “There is, of course, a specific reason why I’m asking for that” Candace said. Watch carefully as a man matching that description appears in the crowd, repeatedly checking his phone just before Charlie begins speaking. Is this the man Candace Owens is looking for?

HustleBitch

1,290,482 次观看 • 10 个月前

It was NEVER an "ENTRANCE" or "EXIT WOUND" from a bullet. What if it was a PUNCTURE WOUND from the PENDANT VIOLENTLY impaling him in the neck this entire time? This would explain the bizarre movement of his t-shirt and what looks like something under it that lifts up right into the EXACT SPOT where the WOUND APPEARS. As soon as the shirt falls, you then see the WOUND. This would also explain the necklace you see flying off that everyone believed was Charlie's earpiece. This actually makes more sense at would support Charlie being shot from another position rather than the front, especially from the roof top in front. The amount of force you see that necklace break and fly backwards off of Charlie, especially his shirt movement makes more logical sense than anything else. cc: triggersmart

It was NEVER an "ENTRANCE" or "EXIT WOUND" from a bullet. What if it was a PUNCTURE WOUND from the PENDANT VIOLENTLY impaling him in the neck this entire time? This would explain the bizarre movement of his t-shirt and what looks like something under it that lifts up right into the EXACT SPOT where the WOUND APPEARS. As soon as the shirt falls, you then see the WOUND. This would also explain the necklace you see flying off that everyone believed was Charlie's earpiece. This actually makes more sense at would support Charlie being shot from another position rather than the front, especially from the roof top in front. The amount of force you see that necklace break and fly backwards off of Charlie, especially his shirt movement makes more logical sense than anything else. cc: triggersmart

The SCIF

142,462 次观看 • 10 个月前

Dear Candace, on 10/09/25 in Ep.251, you laid down this insurmountable claim - “he was 100% shot from the front”. Over the last week, it has become abundantly clear that my outspoken theory (post after post) of an explosion occurring under Charlie’s shirt - is now looked at equally (in the eyes of big ‘boosting’ accounts) as the crazy palm pistol 👏. I wear the scarlet letter of ‘non aligned Candace dissension’ and have been booted from the cool kids table. Quite frankly, me making bold videos that just float in no man’s land aren’t worth it. Thanks to 251, this case will go unsolved and 1 year from now, the same Spaces will be hosted by the same big accounts - talking aimlessly about your earlier aired LIVE! and looking for that mystery shooter & gun - THAT DOESN’T EXIST. Candace Owens, I love ya - but you really F’d up some truth shit saying to your audience (who hang on your every word) that he was 100% shot with a gun from the front - without offering up a shred of proof! Not even Ian MF’n Carroll Ian Carroll would be allowed to rattle off that shit - low key - with ZERO proof. Just words into a camera and BAM! Gospel. So, for the record - a guy wearing a tan/black hat with an American Comeback Tour shirt - standing 10ft away - detonated a charge under Charlie’s shirt - and that is what made him bleed from his neck. And tonight, that triggerman is your number 1 fan. To the free thinkers out there, REMEMBER this, there are multiple videos showing the explosion and the person who pulled the trigger. The only proof of a gun & bullet are spoken words from Andrew Kolvet, Candace Owens & people with badges…*there is a reason for their distraction. Wake up sheep. ✌️b.

Dear Candace, on 10/09/25 in Ep.251, you laid down this insurmountable claim - “he was 100% shot from the front”. Over the last week, it has become abundantly clear that my outspoken theory (post after post) of an explosion occurring under Charlie’s shirt - is now looked at equally (in the eyes of big ‘boosting’ accounts) as the crazy palm pistol 👏. I wear the scarlet letter of ‘non aligned Candace dissension’ and have been booted from the cool kids table. Quite frankly, me making bold videos that just float in no man’s land aren’t worth it. Thanks to 251, this case will go unsolved and 1 year from now, the same Spaces will be hosted by the same big accounts - talking aimlessly about your earlier aired LIVE! and looking for that mystery shooter & gun - THAT DOESN’T EXIST. Candace Owens, I love ya - but you really F’d up some truth shit saying to your audience (who hang on your every word) that he was 100% shot with a gun from the front - without offering up a shred of proof! Not even Ian MF’n Carroll Ian Carroll would be allowed to rattle off that shit - low key - with ZERO proof. Just words into a camera and BAM! Gospel. So, for the record - a guy wearing a tan/black hat with an American Comeback Tour shirt - standing 10ft away - detonated a charge under Charlie’s shirt - and that is what made him bleed from his neck. And tonight, that triggerman is your number 1 fan. To the free thinkers out there, REMEMBER this, there are multiple videos showing the explosion and the person who pulled the trigger. The only proof of a gun & bullet are spoken words from Andrew Kolvet, Candace Owens & people with badges…*there is a reason for their distraction. Wake up sheep. ✌️b.

Blake

84,051 次观看 • 9 个月前

Does anyone else get the vibe that Red Hat Cop was not even a part of UVU PD? Remember, Red Hat was in the crowd the entire time prior to CK’s arrival. In the 15 min after CK was hit, Red Hat was on his phone, pacing frantically, 90% of the time with “someone” and pointed out to the Security Team where to begin searching in the grass. There is more here folks! All other LEOs were on their radios. But not Red Hat. 📲🤔

Does anyone else get the vibe that Red Hat Cop was not even a part of UVU PD? Remember, Red Hat was in the crowd the entire time prior to CK’s arrival. In the 15 min after CK was hit, Red Hat was on his phone, pacing frantically, 90% of the time with “someone” and pointed out to the Security Team where to begin searching in the grass. There is more here folks! All other LEOs were on their radios. But not Red Hat. 📲🤔

Blake

586,090 次观看 • 8 个月前

The SIGNALS from CHARLIE'S SECURITY detail are CLEAR AS DAY. I firmly believe they are involved. You can't deny that this is EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS. Watch the guy below the red arrow confirm with the guy on his RIGHT, then he looks forward and confirms with someone in FRONT of him and even NODS... Then he looks LEFT and confirms with the guy on his LEFT. Then he looks forward and he gives the final SIGNAL DOWN HIS ARM to the hitman and immediately after, the SHOT is PLACED into CHARLIE. The evidence of him confirming with his team to give the GO SIGNAL to take the SHOT is CLEAR AS DAY. I 99.9% believe his security is involved. He literally gets a "green light" from every person he looks at and even nods to one of them, then gives the final signal for the hitman to take the shot.

The SIGNALS from CHARLIE'S SECURITY detail are CLEAR AS DAY. I firmly believe they are involved. You can't deny that this is EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS. Watch the guy below the red arrow confirm with the guy on his RIGHT, then he looks forward and confirms with someone in FRONT of him and even NODS... Then he looks LEFT and confirms with the guy on his LEFT. Then he looks forward and he gives the final SIGNAL DOWN HIS ARM to the hitman and immediately after, the SHOT is PLACED into CHARLIE. The evidence of him confirming with his team to give the GO SIGNAL to take the SHOT is CLEAR AS DAY. I 99.9% believe his security is involved. He literally gets a "green light" from every person he looks at and even nods to one of them, then gives the final signal for the hitman to take the shot.

The SCIF

338,938 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 Candace Owens is doubling down on her ridiculous “body double” theory‼️ Candace continues to say that Tyler Robinson wasn’t on UVU campus the day Charlie was killed. BUT THERE’S A PROBLEM. Tyler was caught on security cameras all around UVU that day. Candace doesn’t actually believe the body double nonsense. She just knows the trial is getting closer and her lies will be exposed so she hopes to hide behind the excuse that all of the video evidence is actually Tyler Robinson body doubles and not him. This is how low she’s willing to sink instead of just admitting she was wrong/lied. So just in case you’re not keeping track: They now believe that Charlie was killed by an exploding microphone that left a wound similar to a gun shot. But they refuse to believe Charlie was shot. And they also believe that Charlie was killed by a Tyler Robinson body double. But they refuse to believe Charlie was killed by Tyler Robinson. So after 9 straight months this is the best these idiots can do. Anything to avoid believing in the truth.

🚨 Candace Owens is doubling down on her ridiculous “body double” theory‼️ Candace continues to say that Tyler Robinson wasn’t on UVU campus the day Charlie was killed. BUT THERE’S A PROBLEM. Tyler was caught on security cameras all around UVU that day. Candace doesn’t actually believe the body double nonsense. She just knows the trial is getting closer and her lies will be exposed so she hopes to hide behind the excuse that all of the video evidence is actually Tyler Robinson body doubles and not him. This is how low she’s willing to sink instead of just admitting she was wrong/lied. So just in case you’re not keeping track: They now believe that Charlie was killed by an exploding microphone that left a wound similar to a gun shot. But they refuse to believe Charlie was shot. And they also believe that Charlie was killed by a Tyler Robinson body double. But they refuse to believe Charlie was killed by Tyler Robinson. So after 9 straight months this is the best these idiots can do. Anything to avoid believing in the truth.

Cinema Shogun

19,276 次观看 • 1 个月前

BREAKING NEWS: An underground tunnel, a headquarters for illegal miners was discovered in a operation to crack down on illegal miners, located under the city. The City of Joburg has been aware of the tunnel however they allowed illegal foreigners to mine illegally unbothered, the tunnel is not linked to the terrorist explosion that happened in Bree Street. Kabelo Gwamnanda is nowhere to be seen, he has not made any statement regarding the dangers of the tunnel, despite the fact that he is aware of the illegal miners operating under the city. The FBI-paid media is selective in their reports, this story is hidden from the public.

BREAKING NEWS: An underground tunnel, a headquarters for illegal miners was discovered in a operation to crack down on illegal miners, located under the city. The City of Joburg has been aware of the tunnel however they allowed illegal foreigners to mine illegally unbothered, the tunnel is not linked to the terrorist explosion that happened in Bree Street. Kabelo Gwamnanda is nowhere to be seen, he has not made any statement regarding the dangers of the tunnel, despite the fact that he is aware of the illegal miners operating under the city. The FBI-paid media is selective in their reports, this story is hidden from the public.

PSAFLIVE

138,029 次观看 • 3 年前

Candace Owens just presented irrefutable evidence that Charlie Kirk’s Rode microphone, the one worn under his shirt, was shattered into countless pieces. 👀💥 The transport vehicle’s floor is covered in minuscule shards of tempered glass, identical to the kind used in the Rode microphone on Charlie’s person when he was “shot.” It’s inexplicable that this crucial detail hasn’t been mentioned by Charlie’s friends or his security team, who were supposed to be responsible for his care during his hour of need. I don’t see any plausible explanation for this evidence that fits the official narrative. The FBI, local law enforcement and TPUSA have a lot of explaining to do.

Candace Owens just presented irrefutable evidence that Charlie Kirk’s Rode microphone, the one worn under his shirt, was shattered into countless pieces. 👀💥 The transport vehicle’s floor is covered in minuscule shards of tempered glass, identical to the kind used in the Rode microphone on Charlie’s person when he was “shot.” It’s inexplicable that this crucial detail hasn’t been mentioned by Charlie’s friends or his security team, who were supposed to be responsible for his care during his hour of need. I don’t see any plausible explanation for this evidence that fits the official narrative. The FBI, local law enforcement and TPUSA have a lot of explaining to do.

Travis

991,169 次观看 • 2 个月前

These 2 videos are interesting. Not saying there is any concrete evidence here, just interesting. Another thing I wanted to add is, does anyone know exactly what type of microphone was attached to his shirt? I'm asking because remember they used pagers as explosives before? What if the microphone attached to his shirt was tampered with? Set off by remote or something? Not saying this is what happened, just putting ideas out. The way his shirt moves and the direction is what bothers me the most about every theory. A shot from the side or more behind him and to the side is more likely if it wasn't from the front. Just speculation, but for now, it was from a rifle. Allegedly.

These 2 videos are interesting. Not saying there is any concrete evidence here, just interesting. Another thing I wanted to add is, does anyone know exactly what type of microphone was attached to his shirt? I'm asking because remember they used pagers as explosives before? What if the microphone attached to his shirt was tampered with? Set off by remote or something? Not saying this is what happened, just putting ideas out. The way his shirt moves and the direction is what bothers me the most about every theory. A shot from the side or more behind him and to the side is more likely if it wasn't from the front. Just speculation, but for now, it was from a rifle. Allegedly.

The SCIF

312,154 次观看 • 11 个月前