Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Straight Latino stud worker masturbates during a break at work #bluecollar #worker #latino #straight #chasingstraight #heteroflexible #brosmessinaround #str8menhunter #bigcock 𝐆𝐚𝐲 𝐕𝐢𝐝𝐬 BlueCollaredCruising @str8menhunte #smoker

Ingeniero tragon

14,576 subscribers

14,876 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #bluecollar #worker #latino #straight #chasingstraight #heteroflexible #brosmessinaround #str8menhunter #bigcock #smoker

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 CAUGHT ON CAMERA AT LAX — BAGGAGE HANDLER THROWING GUITARS DURING LOADING AND PEOPLE ARE PISSED Video shows a baggage handler straight up throwing and dropping guitar cases onto the ground instead of placing them. This is what really happens after check-in, when you have zero control over what’s being done to your stuff. Is this just one worker… or is this exactly how airlines handle it behind the scenes?

🚨 CAUGHT ON CAMERA AT LAX — BAGGAGE HANDLER THROWING GUITARS DURING LOADING AND PEOPLE ARE PISSED Video shows a baggage handler straight up throwing and dropping guitar cases onto the ground instead of placing them. This is what really happens after check-in, when you have zero control over what’s being done to your stuff. Is this just one worker… or is this exactly how airlines handle it behind the scenes?

HustleBitch

49,658 次观看 • 5 个月前

Zhipu AI just dropped a $3 model that beats GPT-5.4. It is called GLM 5.1. It just took 3rd place on the Code Arena charts. Claude Max costs up to 200 dollars a month. GLM 5.1 gives you 94 percent of Claude's power for just 3 dollars. But here is the crazy part. It works completely alone for 8 hours straight. You give it a huge task in the morning. You walk away and do your actual job. At the end of the day, your code is done, tested, and fixed. It is not a simple chatbot. It is an AI worker that builds landing pages and email flows for you. Stop doing the busy work yourself. Get the exact steps to build your own AI systems in my free group. Link in my bio.

Zhipu AI just dropped a $3 model that beats GPT-5.4. It is called GLM 5.1. It just took 3rd place on the Code Arena charts. Claude Max costs up to 200 dollars a month. GLM 5.1 gives you 94 percent of Claude's power for just 3 dollars. But here is the crazy part. It works completely alone for 8 hours straight. You give it a huge task in the morning. You walk away and do your actual job. At the end of the day, your code is done, tested, and fixed. It is not a simple chatbot. It is an AI worker that builds landing pages and email flows for you. Stop doing the busy work yourself. Get the exact steps to build your own AI systems in my free group. Link in my bio.

Julian Goldie SEO

12,606 次观看 • 4 个月前

Anthropic shouldn't have made this free a company doing $47,000,000,000 a year wrote down exactly how they run their AI agents, published the numbers, and charged nobody it's called Graph Engineering: one lead Claude plans a job and hires a swarm of smaller ones, each working its own slice at the same time turns out how many it hires decides everything: → a simple lookup: 1 agent, 3 to 10 tool calls, no swarm → a straight comparison: 2 to 4 workers, 10 to 15 calls each → open-ended research: 10+ workers, one slice of the question each → the lead fires 3 to 5 at once, each running 3+ tools in parallel: up to 90% faster the briefs are where it dies. they told a lead agent to "research the semiconductor shortage" and one worker went off into the 2021 car chip crisis while two others wrote the same 2025 report twice so a worker now gets four things: an objective, an output format, which tools to touch, where its job ends they also pointed one small agent at their own badly written tool descriptions and let it rewrite them every agent that used the new ones finished 40% faster then one grader Claude scores every run 0.0 to 1.0 on five things: factual accuracy, citation accuracy, completeness, source quality, tool efficiency twenty test questions took one of their agents from 30% success to 80% one limit nobody quotes: most coding work has fewer genuinely parallel pieces than research, so a swarm on one repo mostly buys you coordination overhead it pays on wide search and on jobs bigger than one context window free, out of a $965,000,000,000 lab, and almost nobody has copied it yet bookmark this and copy the counts ↓

Anthropic shouldn't have made this free a company doing $47,000,000,000 a year wrote down exactly how they run their AI agents, published the numbers, and charged nobody it's called Graph Engineering: one lead Claude plans a job and hires a swarm of smaller ones, each working its own slice at the same time turns out how many it hires decides everything: → a simple lookup: 1 agent, 3 to 10 tool calls, no swarm → a straight comparison: 2 to 4 workers, 10 to 15 calls each → open-ended research: 10+ workers, one slice of the question each → the lead fires 3 to 5 at once, each running 3+ tools in parallel: up to 90% faster the briefs are where it dies. they told a lead agent to "research the semiconductor shortage" and one worker went off into the 2021 car chip crisis while two others wrote the same 2025 report twice so a worker now gets four things: an objective, an output format, which tools to touch, where its job ends they also pointed one small agent at their own badly written tool descriptions and let it rewrite them every agent that used the new ones finished 40% faster then one grader Claude scores every run 0.0 to 1.0 on five things: factual accuracy, citation accuracy, completeness, source quality, tool efficiency twenty test questions took one of their agents from 30% success to 80% one limit nobody quotes: most coding work has fewer genuinely parallel pieces than research, so a swarm on one repo mostly buys you coordination overhead it pays on wide search and on jobs bigger than one context window free, out of a $965,000,000,000 lab, and almost nobody has copied it yet bookmark this and copy the counts ↓

Argona

117,177 次观看 • 1 个月前

i ran 1,000 agents across the last month of the internet looking for one thing: people who are already paying real money to do a job by hand 24 days later that list has paid me $104,513. the agents cost $4,100. the workers ran on Claude Sonnet 5, which had been out for two days when i started. the verifier ran on Fable 5, back online the day before that. cheap model doing the reading, expensive model doing the judging. none of that is the interesting part. the interesting part has a name, and it is called Graph Engineering: independent work runs side by side instead of in a queue, dependent work keeps its order, and nothing is allowed to grade its own homework. one agent asking one question at a time would still be reading today. wired as a graph, the same models did this: → 1,000 workers, 16 live at once, each handed its own slice: one forum, one thread, one review section. no worker ever saw another's work → every worker hunted one phrase shape: a person admitting what they already pay. "i pay someone to do this every morning." "we keep a guy just for this task." → a separate Fable 5 verifier picked up every hit on fresh context and killed anything without a name and a number attached → all of it collected into one file 1,940,000 discussions read. 41,812 hits. 3,147 survived the verifier. that verifier killed 92% of what the workers brought back, and that number is the entire business. people complain for free. the ones naming who they pay and how much are buyers. 14 hours from launch to one finished file. one agent doing the same work end to end needs 224 hours straight and forgets the beginning by the middle. 3,147 buyers collapsed into 63 repeating jobs. the most profitable one was so boring i almost deleted it on the first pass. 412 people paying a human $740 a month to do the same dull thing by hand. nobody had built for it because nobody wants to build it. i emailed all 412 before writing a line of code. 96 replied. 34 prepaid a year at $1,400. $47,600 in the bank before the product existed. i cost six times less than the person they were already paying, and that closed every call. built it in 11 days, for people who had already written me their own spec. then the remaining 3,147 got the email: 26 more prepaid a year, 97 signed monthly at $129, and four paid $2,000 each to have it fitted to their process. $47,600 + $36,400 + $12,513 + $8,000 = $104,513 take the Graph Engineering out and there is no story. one agent runs out of memory before it finishes 1.9m discussions. a searcher grading its own findings hands you 41,812 pieces of garbage. a thousand workers sharing one context overwrite each other by hour two. fan out where the work is independent. verify on fresh context. isolate every worker. three moves, 24 days, and a month of the internet becomes one file you can sell from. i wrote the whole method down: what a node is, how to spot the dependencies that were never real, and six graphs you can run this week. free ↓ bookmark this

i ran 1,000 agents across the last month of the internet looking for one thing: people who are already paying real money to do a job by hand 24 days later that list has paid me $104,513. the agents cost $4,100. the workers ran on Claude Sonnet 5, which had been out for two days when i started. the verifier ran on Fable 5, back online the day before that. cheap model doing the reading, expensive model doing the judging. none of that is the interesting part. the interesting part has a name, and it is called Graph Engineering: independent work runs side by side instead of in a queue, dependent work keeps its order, and nothing is allowed to grade its own homework. one agent asking one question at a time would still be reading today. wired as a graph, the same models did this: → 1,000 workers, 16 live at once, each handed its own slice: one forum, one thread, one review section. no worker ever saw another's work → every worker hunted one phrase shape: a person admitting what they already pay. "i pay someone to do this every morning." "we keep a guy just for this task." → a separate Fable 5 verifier picked up every hit on fresh context and killed anything without a name and a number attached → all of it collected into one file 1,940,000 discussions read. 41,812 hits. 3,147 survived the verifier. that verifier killed 92% of what the workers brought back, and that number is the entire business. people complain for free. the ones naming who they pay and how much are buyers. 14 hours from launch to one finished file. one agent doing the same work end to end needs 224 hours straight and forgets the beginning by the middle. 3,147 buyers collapsed into 63 repeating jobs. the most profitable one was so boring i almost deleted it on the first pass. 412 people paying a human $740 a month to do the same dull thing by hand. nobody had built for it because nobody wants to build it. i emailed all 412 before writing a line of code. 96 replied. 34 prepaid a year at $1,400. $47,600 in the bank before the product existed. i cost six times less than the person they were already paying, and that closed every call. built it in 11 days, for people who had already written me their own spec. then the remaining 3,147 got the email: 26 more prepaid a year, 97 signed monthly at $129, and four paid $2,000 each to have it fitted to their process. $47,600 + $36,400 + $12,513 + $8,000 = $104,513 take the Graph Engineering out and there is no story. one agent runs out of memory before it finishes 1.9m discussions. a searcher grading its own findings hands you 41,812 pieces of garbage. a thousand workers sharing one context overwrite each other by hour two. fan out where the work is independent. verify on fresh context. isolate every worker. three moves, 24 days, and a month of the internet becomes one file you can sell from. i wrote the whole method down: what a node is, how to spot the dependencies that were never real, and six graphs you can run this week. free ↓ bookmark this

Argona

19,695 次观看 • 1 个月前

📺This 1979 American Bandstand appearance by Lenny and the Squigtones is one of the best examples of how Laverne & Shirley played with the line between fiction and reality. 🍿🍿🍿 Michael McKean and David Lander stay completely in character as Lenny and Squiggy during the entire segment. After performing their songs, they do a post-performance interview where they insist they’re real truck drivers from Milwaukee, and that “Michael McKean and David Lander” are just their managers. They even claim that Laverne and Shirley themselves are fictional characters. What makes this bit work so well is how casually they commit to the bit. Dick Clark plays the perfect straight man, treating their absurd claims with total seriousness. The humor comes from the deadpan delivery and the way they refuse to break character, even when directly asked about the show they’re on. It’s a sharp piece of meta comedy for late-70s network television, where most sitcom characters stayed firmly within their fictional worlds. Lenny and Squiggy treating the Laverne & Shirley universe as something that exists around them was relatively rare at the time. ❓Did this American Bandstand performance feel like peak Lenny and Squiggy, or do you think there were even funnier moments from the characters? 👇 #AmericanBandstand #LennyAndSquiggy #LaverneAndShirley #DickClark #70sTV

📺This 1979 American Bandstand appearance by Lenny and the Squigtones is one of the best examples of how Laverne & Shirley played with the line between fiction and reality. 🍿🍿🍿 Michael McKean and David Lander stay completely in character as Lenny and Squiggy during the entire segment. After performing their songs, they do a post-performance interview where they insist they’re real truck drivers from Milwaukee, and that “Michael McKean and David Lander” are just their managers. They even claim that Laverne and Shirley themselves are fictional characters. What makes this bit work so well is how casually they commit to the bit. Dick Clark plays the perfect straight man, treating their absurd claims with total seriousness. The humor comes from the deadpan delivery and the way they refuse to break character, even when directly asked about the show they’re on. It’s a sharp piece of meta comedy for late-70s network television, where most sitcom characters stayed firmly within their fictional worlds. Lenny and Squiggy treating the Laverne & Shirley universe as something that exists around them was relatively rare at the time. ❓Did this American Bandstand performance feel like peak Lenny and Squiggy, or do you think there were even funnier moments from the characters? 👇 #AmericanBandstand #LennyAndSquiggy #LaverneAndShirley #DickClark #70sTV

BiffBifford™ 🇺🇸

91,217 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨#BREAKING: An Ohio construction crew heard tiny SCREAMS coming from INSIDE a massive excavator… They crawled underneath, started taking the machine apart, and found a tiny KITTEN trapped inside. They saved her life, then they ADOPTED HER AND GAVE HER A JOB. 😂❤️ Her name is Sue, she even has her own custom-made hard hat and safety vest. On July 14, a crew from River Reach Construction was working at a job site in Leavittsburg, Ohio, when operating supervisor Chase Guello heard something strange coming from one of their excavators. At first it sounded almost like a faint beep or screech. So Chase started looking. He climbed onto the machine and looked down into the engine bay… …and there was a TINY ORANGE KITTEN walking around inside the excavator. There was no easy way to reach her, so Chase crawled UNDERNEATH the machine and started removing the skid plate. Finally, out popped this absolutely tiny kitten. Their “rescue mission of the day” had gone from fixing construction equipment to saving a little life. 😂 The guys brought her straight into their air-conditioned office trailer and started taking care of her. They spent DAYS searching the area for her mother or any siblings because they didn’t want to separate her from a family that might still be nearby. They couldn’t find another cat. So the construction crew decided this little girl was their problem now, s they found an experienced foster family who could properly care for her while she was still tiny, and for the next two weeks she was nursed back to health. And obviously a kitten discovered inside an excavator needed an appropriate name. The machine was a Komatsu. So they named her… KOMATSU. Sue for short. 😂😂😂 It gets even better. Videos of Sue’s rescue started spreading online and eventually reached the people at KOMATSU THEMSELVES. So the company sent their smallest new employee some proper PPE: A TINY SAFETY VEST. AND A TINY HARD HAT. 😭😂❤️ After two weeks in foster care, Sue was healthy enough to return to the people who found her. River Reach’s shop mechanic, Jared, and his family are giving her a permanent home. And once Sue is old enough, Jared plans to bring her back and forth to work with him. Her official position??? SHOP CAT. Chase said something about the whole thing that I absolutely love. "We sometimes get stereotyped as rough around the edges and not having feelings, but we still care for such a little kitten.” Millions of people have now watched Sue’s story. All because a construction worker heard a tiny noise inside a gigantic machine… …and cared enough to stop what he was doing and find out what it was. Good work, boys. 🇺🇸

🚨#BREAKING: An Ohio construction crew heard tiny SCREAMS coming from INSIDE a massive excavator… They crawled underneath, started taking the machine apart, and found a tiny KITTEN trapped inside. They saved her life, then they ADOPTED HER AND GAVE HER A JOB. 😂❤️ Her name is Sue, she even has her own custom-made hard hat and safety vest. On July 14, a crew from River Reach Construction was working at a job site in Leavittsburg, Ohio, when operating supervisor Chase Guello heard something strange coming from one of their excavators. At first it sounded almost like a faint beep or screech. So Chase started looking. He climbed onto the machine and looked down into the engine bay… …and there was a TINY ORANGE KITTEN walking around inside the excavator. There was no easy way to reach her, so Chase crawled UNDERNEATH the machine and started removing the skid plate. Finally, out popped this absolutely tiny kitten. Their “rescue mission of the day” had gone from fixing construction equipment to saving a little life. 😂 The guys brought her straight into their air-conditioned office trailer and started taking care of her. They spent DAYS searching the area for her mother or any siblings because they didn’t want to separate her from a family that might still be nearby. They couldn’t find another cat. So the construction crew decided this little girl was their problem now, s they found an experienced foster family who could properly care for her while she was still tiny, and for the next two weeks she was nursed back to health. And obviously a kitten discovered inside an excavator needed an appropriate name. The machine was a Komatsu. So they named her… KOMATSU. Sue for short. 😂😂😂 It gets even better. Videos of Sue’s rescue started spreading online and eventually reached the people at KOMATSU THEMSELVES. So the company sent their smallest new employee some proper PPE: A TINY SAFETY VEST. AND A TINY HARD HAT. 😭😂❤️ After two weeks in foster care, Sue was healthy enough to return to the people who found her. River Reach’s shop mechanic, Jared, and his family are giving her a permanent home. And once Sue is old enough, Jared plans to bring her back and forth to work with him. Her official position??? SHOP CAT. Chase said something about the whole thing that I absolutely love. "We sometimes get stereotyped as rough around the edges and not having feelings, but we still care for such a little kitten.” Millions of people have now watched Sue’s story. All because a construction worker heard a tiny noise inside a gigantic machine… …and cared enough to stop what he was doing and find out what it was. Good work, boys. 🇺🇸

Matt Van Swol

782,211 次观看 • 2 天前

$A Navi Mumbai based journalist Sandhya Jain (56), who writes on women's rights and safety, was badly injured in a hit-and-run accident recently on the Palm Beach Road, as a speeding motorcyclist jumped a red signal to crash straight into her scooty. Shockingly, the culprit biker has not been caught due to "poor CCTV camera quality" as the registered number plate of the motorcycle could not be captured on camera on the city's landmark road stretch. For the past nine days, Jain has been lying at Apollo Hospital at Seawoods with multiple fractures in both her hands, a nose fracture, facial trauma and various other smaller injuries. Talking to media from her hospital bed, Jain said, "On May 18, I was driving my scooty in order to go to NMMC head-office at Belapur to meet a civic official for some work. As per the CCTV recordings of two cameras at the NRI Junction of Palm Beach Road, at exactly 4.39 pm, this biker wearing a maroon shirt jumped the red signal and speeded ahead to dash into my scooty, while I was moving forward as my traffic light was green at that moment." Jain, who edits two magazines 'Women Zone' and 'Kanchan Kanika', added that as she fell down unconscious on the busy road, the biker simply lifted his motorcycle and slyly pushed it away from the accident scene in order to escape. Her husband, Sandeep Kumar Jain, who resides at NRI Complex, said, "It is surprising that while an FIR has been registered at NRI police station against the unknown biker for reckless driving, he has not been arrested as we do not have his vehicle number. The accident happened in broad daylight on the supposedly best road of Navi Mumbai, where several surveillance cameras are installed." The investigating officer (IO), Kiran Swar, of NRI police said: "We have checked some of the CCTV recordings at the time of accident in order to identify the culprit. However, the bike number plate is not properly seen in the video recordings. We are further inquiring into this matter." Commissioner of Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC), Kailas Shinde, told to media: "While NMMC does have a CCTV monitoring room at our Belapur head-office, the police also have a similar CCTV control room with them. They are the primary users of CCTV in order to check various traffic violations etc. Hence, the police should have reported earlier if there is any issue with the camera quality." Shinde added that at present, a private agency is in charge for the maintenance of the CCTV cameras. Social activist Madhu Shankar commented: "What is the use of such an extensive CCTV network in our city if the cameras cannot even capture the vehicle registration number. While Jain's hit-and-run accident took place in daytime, I wonder how vehicles will be identified at night if they are involved in any mishap. Both the NMMC and the police have to sort out this critical issue." City based social worker, Rajesh Singh, of Ganga Sagar Foundation, commented: "I regularly use the Palm Beach Road while driving, and have noticed CCTV camera installations at various traffic signals and junctions. In case the cameras fail to capture the number plates, then they should be replaced with better high definition cams, which also have Al tools to do face recognition."$

A Navi Mumbai based journalist Sandhya Jain (56), who writes on women's rights and safety, was badly injured in a hit-and-run accident recently on the Palm Beach Road, as a speeding motorcyclist jumped a red signal to crash straight into her scooty. Shockingly, the culprit biker has not been caught due to "poor CCTV camera quality" as the registered number plate of the motorcycle could not be captured on camera on the city's landmark road stretch. For the past nine days, Jain has been lying at Apollo Hospital at Seawoods with multiple fractures in both her hands, a nose fracture, facial trauma and various other smaller injuries. Talking to media from her hospital bed, Jain said, "On May 18, I was driving my scooty in order to go to NMMC head-office at Belapur to meet a civic official for some work. As per the CCTV recordings of two cameras at the NRI Junction of Palm Beach Road, at exactly 4.39 pm, this biker wearing a maroon shirt jumped the red signal and speeded ahead to dash into my scooty, while I was moving forward as my traffic light was green at that moment." Jain, who edits two magazines 'Women Zone' and 'Kanchan Kanika', added that as she fell down unconscious on the busy road, the biker simply lifted his motorcycle and slyly pushed it away from the accident scene in order to escape. Her husband, Sandeep Kumar Jain, who resides at NRI Complex, said, "It is surprising that while an FIR has been registered at NRI police station against the unknown biker for reckless driving, he has not been arrested as we do not have his vehicle number. The accident happened in broad daylight on the supposedly best road of Navi Mumbai, where several surveillance cameras are installed." The investigating officer (IO), Kiran Swar, of NRI police said: "We have checked some of the CCTV recordings at the time of accident in order to identify the culprit. However, the bike number plate is not properly seen in the video recordings. We are further inquiring into this matter." Commissioner of Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC), Kailas Shinde, told to media: "While NMMC does have a CCTV monitoring room at our Belapur head-office, the police also have a similar CCTV control room with them. They are the primary users of CCTV in order to check various traffic violations etc. Hence, the police should have reported earlier if there is any issue with the camera quality." Shinde added that at present, a private agency is in charge for the maintenance of the CCTV cameras. Social activist Madhu Shankar commented: "What is the use of such an extensive CCTV network in our city if the cameras cannot even capture the vehicle registration number. While Jain's hit-and-run accident took place in daytime, I wonder how vehicles will be identified at night if they are involved in any mishap. Both the NMMC and the police have to sort out this critical issue." City based social worker, Rajesh Singh, of Ganga Sagar Foundation, commented: "I regularly use the Palm Beach Road while driving, and have noticed CCTV camera installations at various traffic signals and junctions. In case the cameras fail to capture the number plates, then they should be replaced with better high definition cams, which also have Al tools to do face recognition."

Hate Detector 🔍

63,820 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨🚨 PROOF that Tommy Robinson is in jail for LYING, not "telling the truth" This is one of many examples of Tommy defaming the kid in his documentary, "Silenced." A student at the school (a young girl) tells a story about the boy attacking her with a hockey stick in class. Tommy used this "incident" to attack the kid in question, telling his audience that he has a history of attacking young girls. In Tommy's libel lawsuit, he had to back up the legitimacy of this story and his choice to include it in his videos. He made a fool of himself. The girl in the video testified in court, as well as another boy who testified as a witness. In court, the following was revealed: - The girl claims in the video that she has injuries lasting to this day and has been on medication for the pain ever since. NO medical evidence could be provided to back this up. No doctors' records, no prescription for the medications she claimed to be on, no X ray records (which she claimed to have had). The only record from her doctor during this time says she had "no medical issues." - 30 students were present in this PE class, and a teacher. There were 0 other witnesses of the attack. The girl claimed that no one came to her assistance who could be called as a witness. - There was no report of this incident made by the teacher. There was an example provided of when the girl suffered an injury in class, a report was made, and her mother was contacted. None of this happened for this "attack." - The boy who testified as a witness did not help; he simply contradicted the girl's story. When the lesson took place, how many students were present, among others. This boy also contradicted himself numerous times between his original statement and cross examination, he absolutely could not keep his story straight. - During cross examination, when the boy witness was asked why there were no other witnesses of this "attack," he hilariously said that all of the other 30 students happened to be looking in the opposite direction when the incident happened. - The girl claimed that she developed anxiety issues as a direct result of this incident. When her records from her own doctor and school nurse records show clearly that her anxiety predates the incident. - The girl saw an emotional health worker in the school. Not once did she mention this "attack" to this worker. - The girl claims to have told her mother. Yet, the mother never reported the incident to the school at the time, nor did she report this supposed violent attack to the police. The mother chose not to testify as a witness. Based on all of the above, the judge understandably determined, "For the reasons I have given, the Defendant has failed to prove that the Hockey Stick Incident happened. On the evidence, I am satisfied it did not happen, whether as alleged by Charly Matthews or at all." It is important to note that this libel ruling was in response to two Facebook videos posted by Tommy attacking the kid. He then doubled down showing this ridiculous hockey stick story again in Silenced, repeating his claims. This is one of many examples of Tommy clearly lying and defaming the young boy in his documentary. Tommy Robinson is BLATANTLY SCAMMING the public with his fundraising on the back of the idea that he is in prison for "telling the truth." There seems to be a major PR push right now for Tommy to fundraise on the back of this lie. So, I will post more breakdowns like this over the coming days. Tommy Robinson is in jail for lying and defamation and refusing to stop. It is black and white, obvious, clear as day. Regardless of whether you agree with or disagree with his politics.

🚨🚨 PROOF that Tommy Robinson is in jail for LYING, not "telling the truth" This is one of many examples of Tommy defaming the kid in his documentary, "Silenced." A student at the school (a young girl) tells a story about the boy attacking her with a hockey stick in class. Tommy used this "incident" to attack the kid in question, telling his audience that he has a history of attacking young girls. In Tommy's libel lawsuit, he had to back up the legitimacy of this story and his choice to include it in his videos. He made a fool of himself. The girl in the video testified in court, as well as another boy who testified as a witness. In court, the following was revealed: - The girl claims in the video that she has injuries lasting to this day and has been on medication for the pain ever since. NO medical evidence could be provided to back this up. No doctors' records, no prescription for the medications she claimed to be on, no X ray records (which she claimed to have had). The only record from her doctor during this time says she had "no medical issues." - 30 students were present in this PE class, and a teacher. There were 0 other witnesses of the attack. The girl claimed that no one came to her assistance who could be called as a witness. - There was no report of this incident made by the teacher. There was an example provided of when the girl suffered an injury in class, a report was made, and her mother was contacted. None of this happened for this "attack." - The boy who testified as a witness did not help; he simply contradicted the girl's story. When the lesson took place, how many students were present, among others. This boy also contradicted himself numerous times between his original statement and cross examination, he absolutely could not keep his story straight. - During cross examination, when the boy witness was asked why there were no other witnesses of this "attack," he hilariously said that all of the other 30 students happened to be looking in the opposite direction when the incident happened. - The girl claimed that she developed anxiety issues as a direct result of this incident. When her records from her own doctor and school nurse records show clearly that her anxiety predates the incident. - The girl saw an emotional health worker in the school. Not once did she mention this "attack" to this worker. - The girl claims to have told her mother. Yet, the mother never reported the incident to the school at the time, nor did she report this supposed violent attack to the police. The mother chose not to testify as a witness. Based on all of the above, the judge understandably determined, "For the reasons I have given, the Defendant has failed to prove that the Hockey Stick Incident happened. On the evidence, I am satisfied it did not happen, whether as alleged by Charly Matthews or at all." It is important to note that this libel ruling was in response to two Facebook videos posted by Tommy attacking the kid. He then doubled down showing this ridiculous hockey stick story again in Silenced, repeating his claims. This is one of many examples of Tommy clearly lying and defaming the young boy in his documentary. Tommy Robinson is BLATANTLY SCAMMING the public with his fundraising on the back of the idea that he is in prison for "telling the truth." There seems to be a major PR push right now for Tommy to fundraise on the back of this lie. So, I will post more breakdowns like this over the coming days. Tommy Robinson is in jail for lying and defamation and refusing to stop. It is black and white, obvious, clear as day. Regardless of whether you agree with or disagree with his politics.

Gadget

106,110 次观看 • 1 年前

A Drama Academy PhD Explains Why Xiao Zhan Stays Popular Long-Term 👤: If you ask who the real top star in the domestic entertainment industry is, the comment section would probably blow up. But among industry professionals, if any ranking dares to leave out the name Xiao Zhan, then that ranking might as well be thrown straight into the trash. So why do insiders see Xiao Zhan as a stabilizing force, while casual viewers feel he’s especially quiet and low-key. Behind this contrast is the underlying logic that explains how Xiao Zhan can stay popular beyond 2026 and stand out as a one-of-a-kind case. Today, let’s break it down from three psychological angles. First, his socialization path gives him a major advantage. When people look at Xiao Zhan, they shouldn’t just focus on his face, the one that’s topped global “most handsome” lists for six consecutive years. They need to look at his résumé. He debuted at 24. Before that, he graduated from a comprehensive university with a degree in design. He actually worked regular jobs, was a real office worker, started a business, stayed up late, revised drafts, and got worn down by demanding clients. This point is extremely important. Many actors have never worked regular jobs at all. So when they act in workplace dramas, it often feels fake. They’re basically just acting it out. They don’t really know what the real world looks like. But when Xiao Zhan plays Sheng Yang or Xiao Chunsheng, that sense of a real, living person isn’t something he acts. It’s something that’s already in him. In psychology, this is called complete socialization. And for an actor, this is extremely important. Even though I graduated from the Central Academy of Drama, I still think many students who come out of acting programs are lacking in this area. Xiao Zhan brings a designer’s mindset, a professional habit of solving problems, into the entertainment industry. That clarity, together with real workplace experience, is his strongest shield in a world driven by fame and profit. Second, traffic is temporary. Only works truly matter in the long run. Let’s be honest. For most people, the 227 incident would have been a career-ending blow. But for Xiao Zhan, it became a brutal reset of his career. Before that, he was a traffic star supported by fan campaigns. But that storm forced him to go through a psychological transformation early on. On a psychological level, he redefined himself. He clearly understood that traffic and popularity are superficial. Only works are real currency. So he threw himself into the theater, performed A Dream Like a Dream, and at the peak of his popularity, stepped onto the stage of live theater. He spent three years there, training and honing his craft. In psychology, this is called a higher level of desensitization. He stripped away his labels and deliberately put himself into an environment with no filters and no retakes, where he could go all in on his craft. And everyone saw the result. In 2025, The Legend of Zang Hai broke viewership records. During the 2026 New Year crossover period, its ratings share hit legendary status. All of this is the compounded return on those three years of investment. Third, this comes down to the capital side’s sense of psychological security. Here, I’ll have to share a bit of industry insider talk. A lot of people say that Xiao Zhan is “capital’s favorite son.” But honestly, you’re overcomplicating it. The logic of investors is very simple. I invest to make money. Artists who come with low risk and high returns are a guaranteed safe bet. Among top male stars in the domestic entertainment industry, there are only a few real options. Who stays away from messy relationships with female assistants? Who works hard on set, doesn’t cause trouble, cooperates well, and stays professional? In an era where scandals break out at any moment, a top star like Xiao Zhan, with no gossip, no variety shows, who spends his days on set, is basically a low-risk, high-return investment product in the capital market. Even brokerage research reports use him as a reference case. At this point, it’s no longer about whether he’s popular or not. It’s about the fact that his commercial credibility has already turned into real, tangible value, real hard currency in financial terms. To sum it up, Xiao Zhan’s success is adult self-discipline beating empty youthful showmanship. He turned himself from just a name into a brand. So even if casual viewers feel that he appears less often, the moment he shows up, the gap is overwhelming, on a completely different tier. Finally, I want to ask everyone a very clear-headed question. In the entertainment industry, what do you think matters more: being constantly visible on variety shows, or being like Xiao Zhan, where every appearance comes with real substance? #XiaoZhan #肖战

Xiao Zhan World ♥️ Adoki

59,015 次观看 • 7 个月前

🧵 George Stephanopoulos EXPOSED – Economic Illiteracy or Willful Deception? George’s interview with The White House Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett shows what happens when a partisan activist pretends to be a journalist. Let’s break it down—with facts, figures, and TRUTH. 1 George’s Claim: “Tariffs are a tax on the American people.” ▶️ FALSE. Let’s look at what really happened when Trump imposed tariffs on China in 2018: 📉 Chinese exports to the U.S. dropped by $87 billion. 📈 U.S. imports from non-tariff countries increased by $100B+. 💥 China took the hit, not American families. Source: USTR, Census Bureau 2 Consumer Prices? George insists tariffs raise prices. Let’s check the numbers: 📊 Consumer Price Index (CPI) during the Trump tariff rollout (2018–2019): Average CPI increase: 1.8% Historical average (2000–2016): 2.2% ✔️ Tariffs didn’t spike inflation. In fact, prices grew slower under Trump than under Bush or Obama. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) 3 Wages & Jobs George claims prices rose while workers suffered. Again, the facts say otherwise: 💼 Real median household income: 2016 (Obama’s last year): $60,309 2019 (pre-COVID under Trump): $68,703 🔥 That’s an $8,394 increase in just 3 years—the biggest real income surge in U.S. history. Source: U.S. Census Bureau 4 Manufacturing Resurgence Stephanopoulos tries to mock job growth. Let’s look at auto jobs: 🚘 U.S. auto jobs lost under Obama: 400,000+ 📈 U.S. auto jobs gained under Trump (2017–2019): 38,000+ 🏭 Plants reopened in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana—BECAUSE of tariffs. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) 5 Trade Deficit Trump’s critics say tariffs don’t work. But here’s what happened: 📉 Trade deficit with China (goods only): 2018: $419.5B 2019: $345.2B That’s a $74 billion reduction in one year—the largest drop ever recorded. Source: U.S. Census Bureau 6 Why does this matter to YOU? George wants you to believe President Donald J. Trump Trump’s policies hurt working families. But the truth is: ✅ More jobs ✅ Higher real incomes ✅ Lower inflation ✅ A tougher stance on China ✅ And a trade policy that puts YOU before Beijing 7 Meanwhile under Biden: 📈 Inflation soared to 9.1% (2022) 📉 Real wages fell for 24 straight months 📉 401(k)s lost $2.1 TRILLION in value in 2022 📈 Energy prices up 40% And George? Not a peep. Because he’s not a journalist—he’s a propagandist. 8 Let’s not forget: 🧨 George Stephanopoulos was Bill Clinton’s Communications Director. He’s not neutral. He’s not fair. He’s a lifelong Democrat operative trying to dress up as a journalist. 📺 And now, he attacks the one president who stood up for working Americans. 9 President Donald J. Trump Trump’s tariffs weren’t about politics. They were about: 📦 Ending decades of China’s exploitation 👷 Bringing back dignity to U.S. workers 💸 Rebuilding our middle class 🛡️ Protecting America’s industrial base Something George clearly doesn’t understand—or care about. 🔚 Final thought: 📉 George Stephanopoulos is trying to keep YOU misinformed. 📈 President Trump is trying to keep YOU employed and prosperous. Which side are you on?

🧵 George Stephanopoulos EXPOSED – Economic Illiteracy or Willful Deception? George’s interview with The White House Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett shows what happens when a partisan activist pretends to be a journalist. Let’s break it down—with facts, figures, and TRUTH. 1 George’s Claim: “Tariffs are a tax on the American people.” ▶️ FALSE. Let’s look at what really happened when Trump imposed tariffs on China in 2018: 📉 Chinese exports to the U.S. dropped by $87 billion. 📈 U.S. imports from non-tariff countries increased by $100B+. 💥 China took the hit, not American families. Source: USTR, Census Bureau 2 Consumer Prices? George insists tariffs raise prices. Let’s check the numbers: 📊 Consumer Price Index (CPI) during the Trump tariff rollout (2018–2019): Average CPI increase: 1.8% Historical average (2000–2016): 2.2% ✔️ Tariffs didn’t spike inflation. In fact, prices grew slower under Trump than under Bush or Obama. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) 3 Wages & Jobs George claims prices rose while workers suffered. Again, the facts say otherwise: 💼 Real median household income: 2016 (Obama’s last year): $60,309 2019 (pre-COVID under Trump): $68,703 🔥 That’s an $8,394 increase in just 3 years—the biggest real income surge in U.S. history. Source: U.S. Census Bureau 4 Manufacturing Resurgence Stephanopoulos tries to mock job growth. Let’s look at auto jobs: 🚘 U.S. auto jobs lost under Obama: 400,000+ 📈 U.S. auto jobs gained under Trump (2017–2019): 38,000+ 🏭 Plants reopened in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana—BECAUSE of tariffs. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) 5 Trade Deficit Trump’s critics say tariffs don’t work. But here’s what happened: 📉 Trade deficit with China (goods only): 2018: $419.5B 2019: $345.2B That’s a $74 billion reduction in one year—the largest drop ever recorded. Source: U.S. Census Bureau 6 Why does this matter to YOU? George wants you to believe President Donald J. Trump Trump’s policies hurt working families. But the truth is: ✅ More jobs ✅ Higher real incomes ✅ Lower inflation ✅ A tougher stance on China ✅ And a trade policy that puts YOU before Beijing 7 Meanwhile under Biden: 📈 Inflation soared to 9.1% (2022) 📉 Real wages fell for 24 straight months 📉 401(k)s lost $2.1 TRILLION in value in 2022 📈 Energy prices up 40% And George? Not a peep. Because he’s not a journalist—he’s a propagandist. 8 Let’s not forget: 🧨 George Stephanopoulos was Bill Clinton’s Communications Director. He’s not neutral. He’s not fair. He’s a lifelong Democrat operative trying to dress up as a journalist. 📺 And now, he attacks the one president who stood up for working Americans. 9 President Donald J. Trump Trump’s tariffs weren’t about politics. They were about: 📦 Ending decades of China’s exploitation 👷 Bringing back dignity to U.S. workers 💸 Rebuilding our middle class 🛡️ Protecting America’s industrial base Something George clearly doesn’t understand—or care about. 🔚 Final thought: 📉 George Stephanopoulos is trying to keep YOU misinformed. 📈 President Trump is trying to keep YOU employed and prosperous. Which side are you on?

Francois Leclerc

123,170 次观看 • 1 年前

Imagine this: You are a sovereign individual. Your rights are not granted by the government but endowed by God. You have credible information that the public doesn’t yet know. You verify it. You believe it can save lives. So you do what free people are supposed to do. You speak. You publish it online. You build an audience. A community forms. Millions read, watch, and share. People write to you saying your work helped them think critically, ask better questions, maybe even protect their health. You didn’t break the law. You didn’t fabricate data. You didn’t incite violence. You asked questions. Then one day, without warning, everything disappears. Your account is gone. Your reach collapses. Your years of work vanish from feeds overnight. Not because you deleted it. Not because a court found you guilty of anything. But because a “nonprofit” based out of the UK issued a report labeling you a “misinformation superspreader.” They pull a bogus stat out of thin air, then weaponize it to say you are “killing people.” The media amplifies it. Night after night, news anchors repeat the same sinister lie about you. The White House echoes it from the podium. Officials pressure social media companies to “do more” to crack down on you. And then it happens. Your pages have been erased. Your channels have been demonetized. Your voice disappears from your followers’ feeds. The First Amendment didn’t protect you. It was circumvented. Millions who once had access to your message now receive only one narrative. The approved one. The one aligned with trillion-dollar interests and institutional power. And your alleged crime? Opening your mouth and telling the truth. This sounds like something pulled straight from George Orwell’s 1984. But it happened. Not to one person. But over a dozen, all triggered by a stat made out of thin air from overseas. They were called the “Disinformation Dozen.” The CCDH (Center for Countering Digital Hate) claimed that 65% of all anti-vaccine misinformation online came from just 12 individuals. The reality? Facebook later admitted those 12 accounts were responsible for just 0.05% of vaccine-related content views on its platform. This wasn’t a one-off attack. This was a blueprint. After they got away with censoring the “Disinformation Dozen,” they went after you, they went after me, they went after all of us. I was a healthcare worker who simply didn’t like the vax mandates. I started clipping doctors sharing information that went against the narrative. They nuked my Twitter account not once, not twice, but three times. I tried making more accounts. They blocked my phone number from creating new ones. And even if I could make more, they would have nuked those too. I’m still pissed about this, and I can’t believe this actually happened in America. But guess what? The tables are turning. The censors are now the defendants. They censored the speech. Now they must defend the silence. The “Disinformation Dozen” is fighting back in federal court. Ty and Charlene Bollinger (The Truth About Vaccines) didn’t just write a “strongly-worded letter,” as Pam Bondi would say. They filed a nearly 400-page federal lawsuit naming the State Department, the FBI, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, and major Big Tech platforms. The suit alleges a coordinated effort to manufacture a blacklist, pressure platforms, and erase lawful speech under the banner of “misinformation.” “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America,” Ty Bollinger says. This case isn’t just about restoring their accounts. It’s about exposing how a foreign-funded report was amplified from the White House podium, used to justify deplatforming, and weaponized to silence millions of Americans. It’s about whether the government can secretly pressure private companies to do what the Constitution forbids it from doing directly. It’s about whether the First Amendment still means what it says. Because if they can erase voices with millions of followers, they can erase yours too. And now it’s your turn to decide whether free speech will be treated as a God-given right or a “privelege.” First, watch the film. See the evidence. Understand how lies that were made out of thin air, like Fauci’s “six feet social distancing,” were also fabricated to censor voices like the “Disinformation Dozen” and yours truly. Watch how the coordinated effort worked. Understand what happened so this never happens again. Then, if you believe free speech still matters, support the legal fight. These lawsuits are expensive. And those who did the censoring are counting on us to run out of money before we can hold them accountable. Don’t let that happen. When you donate, you’re not just helping Ty and Charlene. You’re standing up for every doctor who was deplatformed, every dissenting voice punished for asking questions, every unvaxxed worker fired from their job, every person denied service for being “unclean.” You’re defending your voice, your children’s voices, and the generations that come after them. Censorship is the disease. Freedom of speech is the cure. If a precedent is set in court, it protects all of us. If it fails, it’s only a matter of time before they attempt to silence us all again under the banner of the next “global emergency.” What happens next depends on whether we act now or sit back and “hope” someone else defends our freedoms for us. Ty and Charlene Bollinger have drawn the line in the sand. Now it’s up to us to back them. “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America.” — Ty Bollinger Don’t let them normalize treating your God-given right to speak freely as a privilege. Watch the film. Support the legal fight. Put the censors on trial. Make them answer in court for what they did. WATCH THE FILM: SUPPORT THE FIGHT:

Imagine this: You are a sovereign individual. Your rights are not granted by the government but endowed by God. You have credible information that the public doesn’t yet know. You verify it. You believe it can save lives. So you do what free people are supposed to do. You speak. You publish it online. You build an audience. A community forms. Millions read, watch, and share. People write to you saying your work helped them think critically, ask better questions, maybe even protect their health. You didn’t break the law. You didn’t fabricate data. You didn’t incite violence. You asked questions. Then one day, without warning, everything disappears. Your account is gone. Your reach collapses. Your years of work vanish from feeds overnight. Not because you deleted it. Not because a court found you guilty of anything. But because a “nonprofit” based out of the UK issued a report labeling you a “misinformation superspreader.” They pull a bogus stat out of thin air, then weaponize it to say you are “killing people.” The media amplifies it. Night after night, news anchors repeat the same sinister lie about you. The White House echoes it from the podium. Officials pressure social media companies to “do more” to crack down on you. And then it happens. Your pages have been erased. Your channels have been demonetized. Your voice disappears from your followers’ feeds. The First Amendment didn’t protect you. It was circumvented. Millions who once had access to your message now receive only one narrative. The approved one. The one aligned with trillion-dollar interests and institutional power. And your alleged crime? Opening your mouth and telling the truth. This sounds like something pulled straight from George Orwell’s 1984. But it happened. Not to one person. But over a dozen, all triggered by a stat made out of thin air from overseas. They were called the “Disinformation Dozen.” The CCDH (Center for Countering Digital Hate) claimed that 65% of all anti-vaccine misinformation online came from just 12 individuals. The reality? Facebook later admitted those 12 accounts were responsible for just 0.05% of vaccine-related content views on its platform. This wasn’t a one-off attack. This was a blueprint. After they got away with censoring the “Disinformation Dozen,” they went after you, they went after me, they went after all of us. I was a healthcare worker who simply didn’t like the vax mandates. I started clipping doctors sharing information that went against the narrative. They nuked my Twitter account not once, not twice, but three times. I tried making more accounts. They blocked my phone number from creating new ones. And even if I could make more, they would have nuked those too. I’m still pissed about this, and I can’t believe this actually happened in America. But guess what? The tables are turning. The censors are now the defendants. They censored the speech. Now they must defend the silence. The “Disinformation Dozen” is fighting back in federal court. Ty and Charlene Bollinger (The Truth About Vaccines) didn’t just write a “strongly-worded letter,” as Pam Bondi would say. They filed a nearly 400-page federal lawsuit naming the State Department, the FBI, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, and major Big Tech platforms. The suit alleges a coordinated effort to manufacture a blacklist, pressure platforms, and erase lawful speech under the banner of “misinformation.” “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America,” Ty Bollinger says. This case isn’t just about restoring their accounts. It’s about exposing how a foreign-funded report was amplified from the White House podium, used to justify deplatforming, and weaponized to silence millions of Americans. It’s about whether the government can secretly pressure private companies to do what the Constitution forbids it from doing directly. It’s about whether the First Amendment still means what it says. Because if they can erase voices with millions of followers, they can erase yours too. And now it’s your turn to decide whether free speech will be treated as a God-given right or a “privelege.” First, watch the film. See the evidence. Understand how lies that were made out of thin air, like Fauci’s “six feet social distancing,” were also fabricated to censor voices like the “Disinformation Dozen” and yours truly. Watch how the coordinated effort worked. Understand what happened so this never happens again. Then, if you believe free speech still matters, support the legal fight. These lawsuits are expensive. And those who did the censoring are counting on us to run out of money before we can hold them accountable. Don’t let that happen. When you donate, you’re not just helping Ty and Charlene. You’re standing up for every doctor who was deplatformed, every dissenting voice punished for asking questions, every unvaxxed worker fired from their job, every person denied service for being “unclean.” You’re defending your voice, your children’s voices, and the generations that come after them. Censorship is the disease. Freedom of speech is the cure. If a precedent is set in court, it protects all of us. If it fails, it’s only a matter of time before they attempt to silence us all again under the banner of the next “global emergency.” What happens next depends on whether we act now or sit back and “hope” someone else defends our freedoms for us. Ty and Charlene Bollinger have drawn the line in the sand. Now it’s up to us to back them. “Make no mistake. Our case will set legal precedent in America.” — Ty Bollinger Don’t let them normalize treating your God-given right to speak freely as a privilege. Watch the film. Support the legal fight. Put the censors on trial. Make them answer in court for what they did. WATCH THE FILM: SUPPORT THE FIGHT:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

88,171 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICAN SCHOOL CHILDREN YOUR KIDS GOT EXTRA CREDIT AT AN ILLINOIS MOSQUE RUN BY ICNA’S CONVERSION ARM A "world religion" class was taken to a Chicago-area mosque with their teacher, Emily. The man in front of them was not a museum guide. He was Dr. Sabeel Ahmed of GainPeace - the official dawah / outreach project of the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA). Speakers. Open houses. Free Qurans. Follow-up for new Muslims. That is ICNA’s public conversion apparatus. ICNA is not a bake sale. Investigators have documented its Jamaat-e-Islami roots. The 1991 Muslim Brotherhood memo - entered as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial - listed ICNA among “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.” Before the tour even started, he asked Aaron what class it was. World religion. Had they already covered the Islam chapter? Yes. Then he said it was “fair game” to quiz them. On tape: “Extra grade, right? Extra credit, perhaps. Some of you need some extra credits.” Hands went up. He ran them through the pillars like Sunday school. Daily prayer. Hajj once in a lifetime. Ramadan. He asked how many Muslims were in the class. Aaron. Amir. Yusuf. Emily asked when kids start fasting. He said obligation starts at puberty - then bragged that his son fasted the entire month at age seven. He bragged on film about how his little daughter puts on hijab automatically when she leaves the house. A student asked how you convert. No baptism. No pool in the basement. Understand the six beliefs and five pillars, then say: There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His messenger. That sentence makes you a Muslim. Then you are expected to live by it. Another student asked the question every parent should hear: What happens if you follow another faith? This is where the game begins. He quoted Quran 2:256: no compulsion in religion. No force. Peaceful education. Your choice. Then he flipped it. Islam is the faith God ordained for humanity. Islam means submitting to the Creator. If you hear that and consciously reject it, there are consequences. Life is a classroom. God is the teacher. At the end comes the exam. Paradise if you submit. Hellfire if you die having rejected Islam. He never told them what “no compulsion” leaves out. The same chapter tells Muslims to fight until religion is for Allah. Muhammad said he was ordered to fight people until they declare there is no god but Allah. Leave Islam after entering it, and classical law is not a debate club. The hadith is: kill him. Apostasy has been punished that way for 1,400 years. A top cleric later admitted that without the apostasy punishment, Islam would not exist today. None of that made the field trip. He also told Christian students there are no statues, no images, no mediator. You pray straight to God. That is not a décor note. That is a denial of Christ as mediator, delivered to kids sitting on a mosque floor for class credit. Women and girls pray upstairs. Men downstairs. His “logical” reason on tape: a boy standing shoulder to shoulder, touching a pretty girl, might think about her instead of God. Prostration in mixed rows would not be “decent.” Friday prayer: men must leave school and work. He said the place holds maybe 300 on a normal day and 2,000 on Friday - gym, basement, classrooms, two services. Kids from the full-time Islamic school break class and file in. He called it the second-largest Islamic school in the United States. Emily did not push back. She sold it. “Very inclusive.” “You got their brains stirring.” Shoes off - “immersive.” Come back during prayer and watch them pray, if the school allows it. “Way better to see it than read it in a book.” She even showed the class One Day in the Haram on Amazon - a Mecca film about spreading Islam on social media. This was not interfaith. This was ICNA GainPeace dawah with a public-school teacher, extra credit, and a camera. Illinois parents: who signed the slip? Who called this extra credit? Who partnered a classroom with a Brotherhood-listed network’s missionary wing and called it education? SEE THE FULL REPORT HERE:

🚨 ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICAN SCHOOL CHILDREN YOUR KIDS GOT EXTRA CREDIT AT AN ILLINOIS MOSQUE RUN BY ICNA’S CONVERSION ARM A "world religion" class was taken to a Chicago-area mosque with their teacher, Emily. The man in front of them was not a museum guide. He was Dr. Sabeel Ahmed of GainPeace - the official dawah / outreach project of the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA). Speakers. Open houses. Free Qurans. Follow-up for new Muslims. That is ICNA’s public conversion apparatus. ICNA is not a bake sale. Investigators have documented its Jamaat-e-Islami roots. The 1991 Muslim Brotherhood memo - entered as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial - listed ICNA among “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.” Before the tour even started, he asked Aaron what class it was. World religion. Had they already covered the Islam chapter? Yes. Then he said it was “fair game” to quiz them. On tape: “Extra grade, right? Extra credit, perhaps. Some of you need some extra credits.” Hands went up. He ran them through the pillars like Sunday school. Daily prayer. Hajj once in a lifetime. Ramadan. He asked how many Muslims were in the class. Aaron. Amir. Yusuf. Emily asked when kids start fasting. He said obligation starts at puberty - then bragged that his son fasted the entire month at age seven. He bragged on film about how his little daughter puts on hijab automatically when she leaves the house. A student asked how you convert. No baptism. No pool in the basement. Understand the six beliefs and five pillars, then say: There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is His messenger. That sentence makes you a Muslim. Then you are expected to live by it. Another student asked the question every parent should hear: What happens if you follow another faith? This is where the game begins. He quoted Quran 2:256: no compulsion in religion. No force. Peaceful education. Your choice. Then he flipped it. Islam is the faith God ordained for humanity. Islam means submitting to the Creator. If you hear that and consciously reject it, there are consequences. Life is a classroom. God is the teacher. At the end comes the exam. Paradise if you submit. Hellfire if you die having rejected Islam. He never told them what “no compulsion” leaves out. The same chapter tells Muslims to fight until religion is for Allah. Muhammad said he was ordered to fight people until they declare there is no god but Allah. Leave Islam after entering it, and classical law is not a debate club. The hadith is: kill him. Apostasy has been punished that way for 1,400 years. A top cleric later admitted that without the apostasy punishment, Islam would not exist today. None of that made the field trip. He also told Christian students there are no statues, no images, no mediator. You pray straight to God. That is not a décor note. That is a denial of Christ as mediator, delivered to kids sitting on a mosque floor for class credit. Women and girls pray upstairs. Men downstairs. His “logical” reason on tape: a boy standing shoulder to shoulder, touching a pretty girl, might think about her instead of God. Prostration in mixed rows would not be “decent.” Friday prayer: men must leave school and work. He said the place holds maybe 300 on a normal day and 2,000 on Friday - gym, basement, classrooms, two services. Kids from the full-time Islamic school break class and file in. He called it the second-largest Islamic school in the United States. Emily did not push back. She sold it. “Very inclusive.” “You got their brains stirring.” Shoes off - “immersive.” Come back during prayer and watch them pray, if the school allows it. “Way better to see it than read it in a book.” She even showed the class One Day in the Haram on Amazon - a Mecca film about spreading Islam on social media. This was not interfaith. This was ICNA GainPeace dawah with a public-school teacher, extra credit, and a camera. Illinois parents: who signed the slip? Who called this extra credit? Who partnered a classroom with a Brotherhood-listed network’s missionary wing and called it education? SEE THE FULL REPORT HERE:

Amy Mek

33,254 次观看 • 1 天前

In Remembrance of Marilyn Monroe on her 100th Birthday Born | June 1, 1926 in Los Angeles, California, USA Probably the most celebrated of all actresses, Marilyn Monroe was born Norma Jeane Mortenson on June 1, 1926, in the charity ward of the Los Angeles General Hospital. Her mother, Gladys Pearl (Monroe), was born in Piedras Negras, Coahuila, Mexico, to American parents from Indiana and Missouri, and was a film-cutter at Consolidated Film Industries. Marilyn's biological father has been established through DNA testing as Charles Stanley Gifford, who had been born in Newport, Rhode Island, to a family with deep roots in the state. Marilyn grew up not knowing for sure who her father really was. Gladys gave Norma Jeane the name of Baker. Poverty was a constant companion to Gladys and Norma. Gladys, who was extremely attractive and later worked for R.K.O. Studios, suffered from mental illness and was in and out of mental institutions for the rest of her life, and because of that Norma Jeane spent time in foster homes. When she was nine, she was placed in an orphanage where she was to stay for the next two years. Upon being released from the orphanage, she went to yet another foster home. In 1942, at sixteen years old, Norma Jeane married twenty-one-year-old aircraft plant worker James Dougherty. The marriage lasted only four years, and they divorced in 1946. By this time, Marilyn began to model swimsuits and bleached her hair blonde. Various shots made their way into the public eye, where some were eventually seen by R.K.O. Pictures head Howard Hughes. He offered Marilyn a screen test, but an agent suggested that 20th Century-Fox would be the better choice for her, since it was a much bigger and more prestigious studio. She was signed to a contract at $125 per week for a six-month period and that was increased by $25 per week at the end of that time when her contract was lengthened. Her first film was in 1947 with a bit part in The Shocking Miss Pilgrim (1947). Her next production was not much better, a bit in the forgettable Scudda Hoo! Scudda Hay! (1948). Two of the three brief scenes in which she appeared wound up on the cutting room floor. Later that same year, she was given a somewhat better role as Evie in Dangerous Years (1947). However, Fox declined to renew her contract, so she went back to modeling and acting school. Columbia Pictures then picked her up to play Peggy Martin in Ladies of the Chorus (1948), where she sang three numbers. Notices from the critics were favorable for her, if not the film, but Columbia dropped her. Once again Marilyn returned to modeling. In 1949, she appeared in United Artists' Love Happy (1949). It was also that same year she posed nude for the now famous calendar shot which was later to appear in Playboy magazine in 1953 and further boost her career. She would be the first centerfold in that magazine's long and illustrious history. The next year proved to be a good year for Marilyn. She appeared in five films, but the good news was that she received very good notices for her roles in two of them, The Asphalt Jungle (1950) from MGM and All About Eve (1950) from Fox. Even though both roles were basically not much more than bit parts, movie fans remembered her dizzy but very sexy blonde performance. In 1951, Marilyn got a fairly sizable role in Love Nest (1951). The public was now getting to know her and liked what it saw. She had an intoxicating quality of volcanic sexuality wrapped in an aura of almost childlike innocence. In 1952, Marilyn appeared in Don't Bother to Knock (1952), in which she played a somewhat mentally unbalanced babysitter. Critics didn't particularly care for her work in this picture, but she made a much more favorable impression later in the year in Monkey Business (1952), where she was seen for the first time as a platinum blonde, a look that became her trademark. The next year, she appeared in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953) as Lorelei Lee. It was also the same year she began dating the baseball great Joe DiMaggio. Marilyn was now a genuine box-office drawing card. Later, she appeared with Betty Grable, Lauren Bacall, and Rory Calhoun in How to Marry a Millionaire (1953). Although her co-stars got the rave reviews, it was the sight of Marilyn that really excited the audience, especially the male members. On Thursday, January 14th, 1954, Marilyn wed DiMaggio, then proceeded to film There's No Business Like Show Business (1954). That was quickly followed by The Seven Year Itch (1955), which showcased her considerable comedic talent and contained what is arguably one of the most memorable moments in cinema history: Marilyn standing above a subway grating and the wind from a passing subway blowing her white dress up. By October 1954, Marilyn announced her divorce from DiMaggio (though the divorce was not finalised until October 31, 1955). In 1955, she was suspended by Fox for not reporting for work on How to Be Very, Very Popular (1955). It was her second suspension, the first being for not reporting for the production of The Girl in the Red Velvet Swing (1955). Both roles went to others. Her work was slowing down, due to her habit of being continually late to the set, her illnesses (whether real or imagined) and generally being unwilling to cooperate with her producers, directors, and fellow actors. However in Bus Stop (1956), Marilyn finally showed critics that she could play a straight dramatic role. It was also the same year she married playwright Arthur Miller. (They divorced January 20, 1961.) In 1957, Marilyn flew to Britain to film The Prince and the Showgirl (1957), which proved less than impressive critically and financially. It made money, but many critics panned it for being slow-moving. After a year off in 1958, Marilyn returned to the screen the next year for the delightful comedy, Some Like It Hot (1959) with Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon. The film was an absolute smash hit, with Curtis and Lemmon pretending to be females in an all-girl band, so they can get work. This was to be Marilyn's only film for the year. In 1960, Marilyn appeared in George Cukor's Let's Make Love (1960) with Tony Randall and Yves Montand. Again, while it made money, it was critically panned as stodgy and slow-moving. The following year, Marilyn made what was to be her final film, The Misfits (1961), which also proved to be the final film for the legendary Clark Gable, who died later that year of a heart attack. The film was popular with critics and the public alike. In 1962, Marilyn was chosen to star in Fox's Something's Got to Give (1962). Again, her absenteeism caused delay after delay in production, resulting in her being fired from the production in June of that year. It looked as though her career was finished. Studios just didn't want to take a chance on her because it would cost them thousands of dollars in delays. She was only 36 years old. Marilyn remains a pop culture icon, with the American Film Institute ranking her as the sixth-greatest female screen legend from the Golden Age of Hollywood. Marilyn acted in only thirty films, but her legendary status and mysticism will remain with film history for ever.

In Remembrance of Marilyn Monroe on her 100th Birthday Born | June 1, 1926 in Los Angeles, California, USA Probably the most celebrated of all actresses, Marilyn Monroe was born Norma Jeane Mortenson on June 1, 1926, in the charity ward of the Los Angeles General Hospital. Her mother, Gladys Pearl (Monroe), was born in Piedras Negras, Coahuila, Mexico, to American parents from Indiana and Missouri, and was a film-cutter at Consolidated Film Industries. Marilyn's biological father has been established through DNA testing as Charles Stanley Gifford, who had been born in Newport, Rhode Island, to a family with deep roots in the state. Marilyn grew up not knowing for sure who her father really was. Gladys gave Norma Jeane the name of Baker. Poverty was a constant companion to Gladys and Norma. Gladys, who was extremely attractive and later worked for R.K.O. Studios, suffered from mental illness and was in and out of mental institutions for the rest of her life, and because of that Norma Jeane spent time in foster homes. When she was nine, she was placed in an orphanage where she was to stay for the next two years. Upon being released from the orphanage, she went to yet another foster home. In 1942, at sixteen years old, Norma Jeane married twenty-one-year-old aircraft plant worker James Dougherty. The marriage lasted only four years, and they divorced in 1946. By this time, Marilyn began to model swimsuits and bleached her hair blonde. Various shots made their way into the public eye, where some were eventually seen by R.K.O. Pictures head Howard Hughes. He offered Marilyn a screen test, but an agent suggested that 20th Century-Fox would be the better choice for her, since it was a much bigger and more prestigious studio. She was signed to a contract at $125 per week for a six-month period and that was increased by $25 per week at the end of that time when her contract was lengthened. Her first film was in 1947 with a bit part in The Shocking Miss Pilgrim (1947). Her next production was not much better, a bit in the forgettable Scudda Hoo! Scudda Hay! (1948). Two of the three brief scenes in which she appeared wound up on the cutting room floor. Later that same year, she was given a somewhat better role as Evie in Dangerous Years (1947). However, Fox declined to renew her contract, so she went back to modeling and acting school. Columbia Pictures then picked her up to play Peggy Martin in Ladies of the Chorus (1948), where she sang three numbers. Notices from the critics were favorable for her, if not the film, but Columbia dropped her. Once again Marilyn returned to modeling. In 1949, she appeared in United Artists' Love Happy (1949). It was also that same year she posed nude for the now famous calendar shot which was later to appear in Playboy magazine in 1953 and further boost her career. She would be the first centerfold in that magazine's long and illustrious history. The next year proved to be a good year for Marilyn. She appeared in five films, but the good news was that she received very good notices for her roles in two of them, The Asphalt Jungle (1950) from MGM and All About Eve (1950) from Fox. Even though both roles were basically not much more than bit parts, movie fans remembered her dizzy but very sexy blonde performance. In 1951, Marilyn got a fairly sizable role in Love Nest (1951). The public was now getting to know her and liked what it saw. She had an intoxicating quality of volcanic sexuality wrapped in an aura of almost childlike innocence. In 1952, Marilyn appeared in Don't Bother to Knock (1952), in which she played a somewhat mentally unbalanced babysitter. Critics didn't particularly care for her work in this picture, but she made a much more favorable impression later in the year in Monkey Business (1952), where she was seen for the first time as a platinum blonde, a look that became her trademark. The next year, she appeared in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953) as Lorelei Lee. It was also the same year she began dating the baseball great Joe DiMaggio. Marilyn was now a genuine box-office drawing card. Later, she appeared with Betty Grable, Lauren Bacall, and Rory Calhoun in How to Marry a Millionaire (1953). Although her co-stars got the rave reviews, it was the sight of Marilyn that really excited the audience, especially the male members. On Thursday, January 14th, 1954, Marilyn wed DiMaggio, then proceeded to film There's No Business Like Show Business (1954). That was quickly followed by The Seven Year Itch (1955), which showcased her considerable comedic talent and contained what is arguably one of the most memorable moments in cinema history: Marilyn standing above a subway grating and the wind from a passing subway blowing her white dress up. By October 1954, Marilyn announced her divorce from DiMaggio (though the divorce was not finalised until October 31, 1955). In 1955, she was suspended by Fox for not reporting for work on How to Be Very, Very Popular (1955). It was her second suspension, the first being for not reporting for the production of The Girl in the Red Velvet Swing (1955). Both roles went to others. Her work was slowing down, due to her habit of being continually late to the set, her illnesses (whether real or imagined) and generally being unwilling to cooperate with her producers, directors, and fellow actors. However in Bus Stop (1956), Marilyn finally showed critics that she could play a straight dramatic role. It was also the same year she married playwright Arthur Miller. (They divorced January 20, 1961.) In 1957, Marilyn flew to Britain to film The Prince and the Showgirl (1957), which proved less than impressive critically and financially. It made money, but many critics panned it for being slow-moving. After a year off in 1958, Marilyn returned to the screen the next year for the delightful comedy, Some Like It Hot (1959) with Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon. The film was an absolute smash hit, with Curtis and Lemmon pretending to be females in an all-girl band, so they can get work. This was to be Marilyn's only film for the year. In 1960, Marilyn appeared in George Cukor's Let's Make Love (1960) with Tony Randall and Yves Montand. Again, while it made money, it was critically panned as stodgy and slow-moving. The following year, Marilyn made what was to be her final film, The Misfits (1961), which also proved to be the final film for the legendary Clark Gable, who died later that year of a heart attack. The film was popular with critics and the public alike. In 1962, Marilyn was chosen to star in Fox's Something's Got to Give (1962). Again, her absenteeism caused delay after delay in production, resulting in her being fired from the production in June of that year. It looked as though her career was finished. Studios just didn't want to take a chance on her because it would cost them thousands of dollars in delays. She was only 36 years old. Marilyn remains a pop culture icon, with the American Film Institute ranking her as the sixth-greatest female screen legend from the Golden Age of Hollywood. Marilyn acted in only thirty films, but her legendary status and mysticism will remain with film history for ever.

Hollywood Golden Age of cinema

35,552 次观看 • 3 个月前

Exposing Demus Pixx Darm. Is this really the competitive scene you want, Fortnite Competitive ? Normally, I wouldn’t care, just like I haven’t for the past few years, but we’re tired. Tired of it always happening to us. Tired of how impossible it is to compete on equal terms. It feels like it’s no longer about who’s better. It’s about who has more connections, who does more teaming, and who threatens others harder. We want to expose three situations that are clearly prohibited in the official FNCS rules, and that completely break the values of fair competition. ----------------------- 1. Repeated griefing and intentional suicides to prevent us from qualifying The team doing this was already qualified. And because we were their biggest threat in their POI, they spent the entire final part of Day 2 looking for us, pushing us, and leaving matches on purpose just to requeue and keep griefing. In the clips, you can clearly see how they eliminate us and immediately suicide just to requeue and find us again. In one game, when we weren’t even in the lobby, they just stood still looking for our names and stream sniped to keep griefing. They’re not trying to win or qualify. They just want to prevent us from doing it. 🟥 This clearly breaks: · Section 8.1.3 – Game Sabotage “Players shall not engage in game sabotage… or any activity harmful to the enjoyment of Fortnite by other users as intended by Epic.” · Section 8.2.1 – Competitive Integrity “Any form of unfair play is prohibited by these Rules.” “Intentionally Disconnecting from Fortnite after you or a member of your team takes damage…” · Section 8.2.2 – Collusion “Feeding: Intentionally allowing oneself to be eliminated by an opposing player.” While this isn't traditional “feeding,” they are intentionally dying after targeting us, only to requeue and do it again. That’s sabotage, and it clearly violates the spirit and intent of these rules. ----------------------- 2. Systematic teaming with friends from their country 🇵🇱 There is no competitive integrity when 100% of the games are played the same way, by the same two teams trading surge, never finishing kills, and never actually fighting. This isn’t a real contest. It’s always the same surge base, the same damage pattern, and zero intent to eliminate. In one clip below, they even knock each other and have a launch pad right below them, but don’t use it. Because they’re friends. Let’s be clear: Kombek is in our heat, and he’s openly friends with Pixx Demus. If they’re teaming in customs, how can we trust that when we fight their friends during Heat 1, Kombek won’t rotate to back them up? It’s happened before. And it keeps happening. 🟥 This clearly violates: · Section 8.2.2 – Collusion “Teaming: Players working together during the Match while on opposing teams.” “Planned Movement: Agreement between two or more opposing players to land at specific locations and move through the map in a planned way before the Match begins.” “Communication: Sending or receiving signals (both verbal and non-verbal) to communicate with opposing players.” This isn’t strategy. It’s blatant system abuse, and everyone sees it. ----------------------- 3. Coaching and pre-planned griefing across heats They’re coaching teams (friends) in other heats to grief the players contesting their spot, so that if those friends qualify, they’ll get a completely free drop in Grands. They’re manipulating the tournament before it even begins, and the worst part is that they post about it publicly, proudly. And maybe this would make some sense if later that teams planned to contest Demus, Pixx or Darm in Grands, but they don’t. They’ve already agreed beforehand not to land on them. They’re just helping eliminate threats now so they can keep the drop uncontested later. This is about: - Coaching others to do their dirty work - Cross-heat griefing coordination - Securing free drops before even qualifying 🟥 This breaks: · Section 8.2.1 – Competitive Integrity “Each player is expected to play within the spirit of Fortnite and these Rules at all times during any Event Match.” “Utilizing outside assistance regarding the location of other players… or any other information not otherwise known to the player by the information on his or her own screen.” · Section 8.2.2 – Collusion “Any agreement to intentionally influence the outcome of any match or Event.” This isn’t a one-off case. It’s deliberate, long-term structural manipulation of drops, heats and the entire competitive system. ----------------------- Where’s the fairness when you load into a game? What chance do new or unknown players have if they don’t have the right connections? Do you really want a competitive scene where abusing the system, not skill, is what works best? And no, this isn’t “contest” These are 10 out of 10 games between the same two teams, building the same surge bases, trading damage, and making each other’s games infinitely easier. There’s no midgame. No map strategy. No real rotations. Just teaming and abuse. This is not the Fortnite we fell in love with Remove surge. Or at least: - Penalize repeated surge trades between the same teams - Prevent infinite surge exchanges between friends - Punish ultra-late rotations after fake trades Do something. Anything. Because this isn’t what competitive Fortnite was meant to be. We just want to compete. Show what Spain can do. Play fair. Real 3v3s. No alliances, no coaching favors, no manipulation. We appreciate any support on this post. We’re doing it for our region. We deserve the same right to compete as anyone else. We can’t stay silent when: - We’re being teamed on - We’re griefed in 5 straight games - Others are being coached to cone us We’ve already reported everything. And we encourage anyone who’s gone through something similar to report it too. We have clips, proof, screenshots, and we’re ready to provide whatever is needed for a serious investigation. All we’re asking for is a fair chance to compete. There needs to be a line. A precedent. If you care even a little about this game, it’s time to act. And let’s not pretend this is new. Every season it's the same. Hogman Loomin Leven Tocata Evanosaurus “Unrawrl Engine 5.8” Rex Fortnite_ES

Exposing Demus Pixx Darm. Is this really the competitive scene you want, Fortnite Competitive ? Normally, I wouldn’t care, just like I haven’t for the past few years, but we’re tired. Tired of it always happening to us. Tired of how impossible it is to compete on equal terms. It feels like it’s no longer about who’s better. It’s about who has more connections, who does more teaming, and who threatens others harder. We want to expose three situations that are clearly prohibited in the official FNCS rules, and that completely break the values of fair competition. ----------------------- 1. Repeated griefing and intentional suicides to prevent us from qualifying The team doing this was already qualified. And because we were their biggest threat in their POI, they spent the entire final part of Day 2 looking for us, pushing us, and leaving matches on purpose just to requeue and keep griefing. In the clips, you can clearly see how they eliminate us and immediately suicide just to requeue and find us again. In one game, when we weren’t even in the lobby, they just stood still looking for our names and stream sniped to keep griefing. They’re not trying to win or qualify. They just want to prevent us from doing it. 🟥 This clearly breaks: · Section 8.1.3 – Game Sabotage “Players shall not engage in game sabotage… or any activity harmful to the enjoyment of Fortnite by other users as intended by Epic.” · Section 8.2.1 – Competitive Integrity “Any form of unfair play is prohibited by these Rules.” “Intentionally Disconnecting from Fortnite after you or a member of your team takes damage…” · Section 8.2.2 – Collusion “Feeding: Intentionally allowing oneself to be eliminated by an opposing player.” While this isn't traditional “feeding,” they are intentionally dying after targeting us, only to requeue and do it again. That’s sabotage, and it clearly violates the spirit and intent of these rules. ----------------------- 2. Systematic teaming with friends from their country 🇵🇱 There is no competitive integrity when 100% of the games are played the same way, by the same two teams trading surge, never finishing kills, and never actually fighting. This isn’t a real contest. It’s always the same surge base, the same damage pattern, and zero intent to eliminate. In one clip below, they even knock each other and have a launch pad right below them, but don’t use it. Because they’re friends. Let’s be clear: Kombek is in our heat, and he’s openly friends with Pixx Demus. If they’re teaming in customs, how can we trust that when we fight their friends during Heat 1, Kombek won’t rotate to back them up? It’s happened before. And it keeps happening. 🟥 This clearly violates: · Section 8.2.2 – Collusion “Teaming: Players working together during the Match while on opposing teams.” “Planned Movement: Agreement between two or more opposing players to land at specific locations and move through the map in a planned way before the Match begins.” “Communication: Sending or receiving signals (both verbal and non-verbal) to communicate with opposing players.” This isn’t strategy. It’s blatant system abuse, and everyone sees it. ----------------------- 3. Coaching and pre-planned griefing across heats They’re coaching teams (friends) in other heats to grief the players contesting their spot, so that if those friends qualify, they’ll get a completely free drop in Grands. They’re manipulating the tournament before it even begins, and the worst part is that they post about it publicly, proudly. And maybe this would make some sense if later that teams planned to contest Demus, Pixx or Darm in Grands, but they don’t. They’ve already agreed beforehand not to land on them. They’re just helping eliminate threats now so they can keep the drop uncontested later. This is about: - Coaching others to do their dirty work - Cross-heat griefing coordination - Securing free drops before even qualifying 🟥 This breaks: · Section 8.2.1 – Competitive Integrity “Each player is expected to play within the spirit of Fortnite and these Rules at all times during any Event Match.” “Utilizing outside assistance regarding the location of other players… or any other information not otherwise known to the player by the information on his or her own screen.” · Section 8.2.2 – Collusion “Any agreement to intentionally influence the outcome of any match or Event.” This isn’t a one-off case. It’s deliberate, long-term structural manipulation of drops, heats and the entire competitive system. ----------------------- Where’s the fairness when you load into a game? What chance do new or unknown players have if they don’t have the right connections? Do you really want a competitive scene where abusing the system, not skill, is what works best? And no, this isn’t “contest” These are 10 out of 10 games between the same two teams, building the same surge bases, trading damage, and making each other’s games infinitely easier. There’s no midgame. No map strategy. No real rotations. Just teaming and abuse. This is not the Fortnite we fell in love with Remove surge. Or at least: - Penalize repeated surge trades between the same teams - Prevent infinite surge exchanges between friends - Punish ultra-late rotations after fake trades Do something. Anything. Because this isn’t what competitive Fortnite was meant to be. We just want to compete. Show what Spain can do. Play fair. Real 3v3s. No alliances, no coaching favors, no manipulation. We appreciate any support on this post. We’re doing it for our region. We deserve the same right to compete as anyone else. We can’t stay silent when: - We’re being teamed on - We’re griefed in 5 straight games - Others are being coached to cone us We’ve already reported everything. And we encourage anyone who’s gone through something similar to report it too. We have clips, proof, screenshots, and we’re ready to provide whatever is needed for a serious investigation. All we’re asking for is a fair chance to compete. There needs to be a line. A precedent. If you care even a little about this game, it’s time to act. And let’s not pretend this is new. Every season it's the same. Hogman Loomin Leven Tocata Evanosaurus “Unrawrl Engine 5.8” Rex Fortnite_ES

yX khaorz

82,922 次观看 • 1 年前

Min Hee-jin (NewJeans Producer) NHK Music Interview 🔗 “Meticulously planned debut ‘Attention’” 🧢: When I was preparing to launch NewJeans, I really struggled with deciding what our first piece of content should be. I thought about it for a long time and considered many possibilities. It was a project that came with high expectations, and for me personally, it was also my first opportunity to prove myself. So how I presented it mattered enormously. Even down to the smallest details… like the impression the very first released photo might give, or what kind of impact we could make at launch. I thought hard about what kind of content would be the most effective… should it be a video or a photo? What time of day would be most effective to release it? I consider things like that very carefully. For example, the way a person experiences content at night versus during the day can feel quite different emotionally. So I even thought about those subtle aspects. Eventually, the conclusion I reached was: “Let’s make the most of our situation.” At the time, the members hadn’t been revealed, and no one knew how many of them there were or what kind of group this would be. So I wanted to maximize that curiosity. You know how the more something is concealed, the more curious people become? I wanted to build that curiosity to a peak and then release everything all at once. That’s why we decided not to release a teaser and instead go straight into a full music video. (This was actually inspired by Hyein suggesting we skip teasers.) I didn’t think still images or photos would be enough to fully convey the feeling I wanted to express. I felt that video and music together would evoke the emotional response I was looking for because people experience things synesthetically. When sound, image, and feeling come together, the emotional impact is stronger. I believed the best way to present the members’ images was through music and a moving picture… that’s why we led with a music video. In the debut music video, “Attention,” there’s a scene where the members act out a little drama. I paid very close attention to that moment and created music that would fit it precisely. For me, I don’t just make content… I design the entire process of how it should be shown for the greatest effect. And I believe that’s incredibly important. That first feeling someone gets when they encounter something… that emotion, that spark… is so important to me. I’m very detail-oriented, but I also value fun deeply. So rather than just releasing content, I want to enjoy the process leading up to it. Even when we released our second album, since we shot the entire music video across the country, the sequence of how we released the videos was critical for me. It’s hard to explain all this simply in an interview, but maybe some people noticed: the first content we released that time was actually a teaser for the last track, “ASAP,” and then we followed that with the full music video for “New Jeans,” which was the first track. That order was a carefully calculated strategy. It was designed to guide the audience’s emotional journey. Seeing the audience react just as I had hoped—that whole process was honestly so fun and thrilling for me. I think I really enjoy that kind of thing. ——— “How 'Ditto' was born” 🧢: People often praise the music of NewJeans, and I hear a lot of talk about genres. But actually, I don’t feel bound by genre at all. I love a wide variety of music. I’m not the type to insist on only one particular genre. What I love are songs that blend genres cleverly… those are my personal favorites. So going forward, my focus is not on genre but on whether something feels fresh and whether it can create an emotional moment. I don’t want to define what kind of music we make. And I think you have to experience the flow of the times to really understand what’s meaningful in a given moment. For instance, the song “Ditto” was chosen because it delivered emotion. It matched perfectly with the winter album concept I had envisioned, both in terms of timing and mood. When I hear a song, I tend to trust my gut. I have a pretty strong intuition for which songs will resonate. It’s not about objectively predicting what will be a “hit,” but about whether a song moves your heart… you can just feel it. Of course, my own taste plays a big role. But I think that’s actually my strength as a producer, not as a composer. When I hear a song, I can immediately picture the visual… what kind of story, what kind of vibe it could carry. That allows me to work faster. For example, when expressing something like school uniforms, there are so many possible variations. But I always like to start from the basics… what’s the original idea of a school uniform? I try to return to that. So with “Ditto,” I wanted to tap into something primal… the pure, basic feeling of liking someone. That kind of emotion is universal. Everyone has it; it’s wired into us. When I saw Director Shin Woo-seok’s interpretation of it, I thought, “Yes, that’s it.” That’s the kind of complete interpretation I look for. I believe the completion of a project comes from every person involved thinking about their part down to the final detail… the maximum quality they can bring out. My role is to unify and refine all of that. I draw out the essence of each person’s creativity, trimming away anything unnecessary. So the final product is something that’s polished and high-quality, just the way I envisioned it. That’s my working style. So it’s not like I’m fixated on retro or stuck in a particular style. I don’t think human taste has changed all that much. Things people liked in the past are the same things we like now. It’s just the form of expression that changes with time. I don’t feel bound by “past” or “present.” I don’t even think in those boundaries. To me, it’s all just good taste. You know how kids sometimes have their own little treasure boxes when they’re young? I think my work is kind of like that. I want to make things that never feel dated—that are timelessly enjoyable. ——— “Dance Expression and 'Hype Boy'” 🧢: I had a vision of what kind of girl group I wanted to create. That’s why I chose a song like “Hype Boy.” And to bring out that feeling, we created four different versions of the music video. Every choice had a purpose, everything was designed to maximize the experience of the song. “Hype Boy” is such a unique song. It has this strange, piercing melody that gives people chills in a good way. To emphasize that tingling feeling, I had to break away from the standard K-pop choreography format… you know, the kind where everyone is in perfect formation, doing synchronized moves. But our songs don’t suit that kind of choreography. Our dances are much harder. They require the body to move very naturally with the groove of the melody and beat. So I think our members are incredible. It’s not easy to express naturalness with your body, and you have to really enjoy it to make it look effortless. But they pulled it off so well. They’re still young, but they’re so talented. And through it all, I wanted to avoid making them look like they were performing just for business. I wanted them to show the pure joy and bright spirit that’s natural for people their age… genuine, carefree, radiant. ——— “The difference between NewJeans and conventional K-POP” 🧢: Ah, for me, it’s all about naturalness. And honestly, naturalness isn’t something you can produce or direct into existence. It comes from how I interact with the NewJeans members on a daily basis… what kind of environment they practice in, how they live and work. There are so many things that don’t appear on camera, but those unseen aspects have to be in place in order for true naturalness to come through. That’s why I wanted to create that kind of environment for the girls. And also, I wanted to shape my own working environment in that way too. Only then can something truly natural, something unforced and not overly stimulating, really come out. To begin with, I don’t believe anyone can be completely natural in front of a camera or under the gaze of others. It’s human nature to become self-conscious. That’s why I think naturalness is our strength, but it can’t be our concept. If you try to turn “naturalness” into a concept, it actually becomes incredibly artificial. So why do I place so much importance on naturalness? It’s because the girls are still so young. While other kids their age are going through school and having a wide range of life experiences, these members are living very different lives. Before they officially debuted, I told them, “This is like studying together with me.” Our standard contract is seven years, which is about the same length as going through high school and college in Korea: three years of high school and four years of university. So I told them, “We’re going to school together. We’re learning together.” And in that sense, I want to be a good teacher to them. They’re also surrounded by an incredibly professional team, people they’d never meet even in a traditional school setting. I’ve never really liked the word idol. These days, that word is used more like a job title, something manufactured by the industry, and it’s far from its original meaning. To me, the term idol feels misplaced. It doesn’t really reflect who these artists are or what they represent. And I’m not the kind of person who clings to labels or terminology. In fact, what I really want is to break the stereotypes and preconceptions that come with the idol industry. I want us to show people something different… to challenge those assumptions and redefine what this can look like. That’s the kind of mindset I have. ——— “Isn't it difficult for the members to express "naturalness"?” 🧢: There were a lot of things I considered when forming the group. First and foremost, I think it was important that the members shared a similar vibe… like how I prefer working with staff who align with my taste. It’s important for the crew to be on the same wavelength. And by that, I mean more than just getting along… it also extends to shared values. Of course, people won’t all share identical values, but when we’re facing in a similar direction, everything becomes easier. It’s also just more efficient to work with people who have overlapping tastes. Now, when it comes to our members, they each have their own individual tastes, but those preferences are still in development. Just like we all went through as kids, they’re still growing, still discovering themselves. They’re not in a finished state. So we didn’t cast them based on some complete or polished version of themselves. It wasn’t like, “This person is fully formed, let’s pick her.” It was more like, “Ah, she has potential, there’s something there.” That sense of a spark… those were the kinds of subtleties I paid attention to. I didn’t cast anyone just because they were pretty or could sing well. I don’t work like that. I really value those finer, more delicate aspects. Even the design of the light stick wasn’t something that came from a long strategic planning session… it was actually a spontaneous idea. I didn’t sit down and think, “Let’s make a light stick like this.” NewJeans didn’t have a fixed logo, but I felt we still needed a unifying symbol. So one night, just before going to sleep, I kept thinking about it. Right before dozing off, I started sketching and it turned into a rabbit’s face. When I drew it out, the shape just continued and turned into a bunny. To me, the NewJeans members are like little bunnies… playful, innocent. Their visuals also resemble rabbits in a way. And rabbits symbolize abundance. That made me think: “Ah, maybe our fans will multiply like rabbits. That would be great.” So that bunny face became both a symbol for the members and the fans. The image came to me all at once, and I imagined a venue completely filled with bunny light sticks. That vision led to the creation of the light stick itself. Since I always prioritize fun in everything I do, the next idea that came to mind was making the light stick customizable. I thought, “Wouldn’t it be great if fans could personalize their bunny?” That way, each rabbit would represent a different person’s character. So we included accessories, allowing everyone to customize their own bunny. It’s symbolic of all these different bunnies coming together and enjoying a good time as one. Our light stick has a big head, so when it’s used in a concert hall, it lights up in heart shapes that are very visible. That was the image I really wanted. And that bunny face… it’s also a heart. It represents both the face of NewJeans and our hearts. It’s the love we’re showing to our fans, and the love we want to receive in return. Every time I see it, I feel deeply moved. It’s very emotional for me because it’s a perfect realization of what I envisioned. As someone with a background in creative direction, there’s nothing more satisfying than seeing an idea materialize exactly the way you imagined it. That kind of work holds deep meaning for me. ⸻ 🧢: Looking back, I think in 2023 we were able to achieve almost everything we had hoped for. I’m so incredibly grateful for that. Of course, this is an ongoing challenge… and the better things go, the more pressure there is. That’s why I always try to return to my original mindset. Just like I tell the members, I try to remind myself of the beginning and keep things fun. Back then, when we were first putting out content, planning the music, and working on visuals, I felt this thrill… this rush of excitement. I don’t want to forget that feeling. So I try hard to engrave that emotion into every album we release. I’m constantly working to rediscover the joy in all of it. So for 2024, I hope everyone can look forward to us with fresh anticipation. And even if we come out with something completely new, I hope people will receive it warmly and with excitement. That’s really my deepest wish. 🙏

1tokki

17,635 次观看 • 1 年前

RESCUE OF THE KEEPER OF TARA EARTH This is going to sound like absolute fiction, but the story still needs to be told. Let me preface by saying I’m not just sane, but an autodidact polymath with multiple quantum physics patents under exclusively my own name, not part of any collaboration. So by dismissing my testimony as someone who is just nuts is really reading a book strictly through its cover. This all actually happened, even if you’ve never heard of anything like this before. What we don’t know about ‘the real worlds’ out there you could barely fit in all of our skies, we’ve been that isolated here. Everyone in this preschool dimension have preconceived notions about who ‘god’ is, inflated to the realm of all-knowing and all-powerful, able to create whole worlds, complete with millions of species of flora and fauna, and all in just 6 days. And while it is true such powers do exist, they are not without collaboration with other ‘gods’ to make that all happen, no matter how grandiose your captors want to make themselves seem. Just one species of your apples or oranges here represents possibly trillions of years of development and perfection. They didn’t just magically appear. “God” is a psyop term that stands for the word “perfect”, of which there is no such thing. The term perfect is strictly subjective, because what may seem perfect to a caveman is going to seem rudimentary kid’s stuff to George Jetson. The real term for the creator of all things is not ‘god’, but rather Prime Creator. “God” is actually DOG spelled backward and got its name from the Dog Star, also known as Sirius A, the headquarters of the Anuhazi Elohim’s breakaway group that call themselves The Michaelube, Suns of Ba’al. The ‘Arch Angels’ want you to believe they are the creator god of all things in this world. That was a lie 560m years ago and it is still a lie today. In reality, Tara Earth existed more than 4 billion years prior to the Anuhazi’s arrival to take the Human Elohim Project spirit essences hostage. They DID in fact help create Tara earth, just like you did, because they are fractals of Prime Creator. But to present themselves as ‘one guy with a long white beard who created the world and everything in it’ is word magic and gaslighting, designed to demoralize and subjugate Humans. For more on the why to this psychopathic plan, see my article: 👉 HISTORY OF THE CHIMERA. With that said, there are MANY beings in the world around you that are secretly ancient ‘gods’ of past eras who really do have more powers than humans do. I know, because I’ve met some and dealt with others during my years of education from the keeper of our simulation. There are also beings here who have roles to play to keep our world functioning correctly so Tara is able to continue offering a holographic platform for your manifestation adventure, who also have god-like powers, such as the keeper mentioned above, and others that are part of the team I refer to as the ‘crew’. You would call them angels, I call them people. Scary powerful people, but still people. Among the ‘crew’ is the main ‘keeper’ of the simulation that you wind up referring to as god down through the ages, because once in a while humans get to meet the keeper and witness the power for themselves which is very obviously not human. But the keeper doesn’t have a long flowing white beard, doesn’t sit on a throne in the sky and certainly isn’t perfect. But like you, a work in progress. Always seeking greater balance. That is the one common denominator among all fractals of Prime Creator, regardless if they are currently playing ‘bad guy’ roles, or ‘good guy’ roles. Understand there are beings here constantly at war against the keeper that has control of the universal elements of the hologram. Also understand, like the other beings who came here from much higher dimension with ‘god-like’ powers, they fractalize themselves into many, many different bodies, so it is effectively impossible to ever ‘kill’ each other. You would have to not only find all the many hundreds or thousands of them, but have a fool-proof way of killing them all at the same exact moment, making sure they are gone-gone, not just that one avatar holding their spirit awareness. That’s not going to happen. Not to any of them from what I’ve witnessed. Which means simply, as far as you are concerned, they are eternal beings, continuously here since 560m years ago in some case, depending when each one of them arrived. The ‘gods’, and the keeper, live in mortal bodies that age and die. But their positions are always held by the next one of themselves that can step into that role to maintain continuity of their offices. These are all the same person and can appear exactly identical to each other, or they can take on totally different appearances as well. I’m not sure why or how, but I’ve seen them both ways. After I was contacted by the keeper and informed of my role where I was in contract to supply protection and help to the crew back in 2013, eventually I was activated for that help in September of 2017. Both the keeper and a portion of the worldwide crew support staff as it were, had been taken hostage in California. I was tasked to bring them out to safety. I won’t go deeply into the details of this, but it was a serious situation where the invader races had stripped the keeper of all access to banks and cash, making it impossible to remain safe inside of the place they had been using as headquarters, literally casting them into the streets. And before you imagine this would be ‘impossible’, the keeper can’t just manifest stacks of cash out of thin air, and also there were a massive amount of beings all working together to neutralize them so they could possibly remove them from the levers of power of the simulation. That’s really all I can offer for details about that for now. The alphabet agencies were keeping the entire crew isolated in that one city, living in a car, camping in the woods and basically making it impossible to look after Tara. The keeper was able to get donations through various support mechanisms, but were shut out of getting off the streets. They brought in specialists to help them all escape, but the agencies wound up permanently disabling them, or taking them out altogether. That’s when I was contacted for assignment. Not being one of ‘the gods’ like they are, I was naturally terrified of having anything to do with this mission because I had no powers I was aware of that could provide anything they couldn’t. Which is really a fantastic understatement, since the keeper and crew can translocate anywhere in the world in seconds, have ‘thousands of avatars’ scattered out as vessels they can use in any city around the world, and basically everything they can do we can’t are about as intimidating as they can be. But I was told I was the only one who could rescue them. And while that may sound like the perfect scenario for a deluded mind seeking validation with illusions of grandeur, like a classic mental patient would come up with in their insane mind, this is what I was actually told, and I do mean in real life. To this day I find it as confusing to believe as you will trying to believe me now. Nonetheless, I carry certain powers I have been fitted with for my contract here on earth that I have had no education about at all. And the main one I’ve learned of now is I have a frequency shield that blocks out ‘the gods’ from doing harm. As long as the keeper and crew were within that field, the invaders were rendered powerless. Wow, even I want to roll my eyes at that. But I watched it play out first hand now multiple times after I got the crew off the streets in a ‘place of safety’ over the next couple of years. As long as I was at the safe house, nothing nefarious happened. When I went shopping every other week for groceries in town over 10 miles away, that’s when all hell would break out back at the compound. Those stories too would seem impossible to you to believe, just like everything else I am covering here, so I won’t go deeply into them. But they included black helicopters, 10’ long rattlesnakes sealing off the safe house & even assassinations. I was even requested to get to town and back as quickly as possible and not to linger due to these threats. I was told that my frequency shield while blended to the natural frequency shield the keeper and crew all have reached ‘87.3 miles’ apart (or so, going by memory now. But it was a very specific number). But even though the overall power of our combined fields still increased within that distance, the closer I was to the group, the more powerful the shield. I’m just telling you what I was told. You can believe it or not. I certainly wouldn’t believe it had I not actually witnessed it myself, so I’m right there with you if that’s your position. That brings us to the story I intended to pass along to you here; regarding that flight from ‘homeless bondage’ out across the deserts that spanned well over 1000 miles I was brought in for. The keeper and crew had been held hostage and homeless for 2 ½ years by the time I got the call requesting me to sell everything I owned and fly half way around the world for their rescue. Their lives had been hell, trust me. I arrived late at night where they picked me up and the hard part of the journey began. I will skip the details of the truly insane things I witnessed starting then for another time after the separation, for obvious reasons having to do with breadcrumbs and the very real fluid war we’re inside of still. But I will tell you about the ‘angels’ that were with us for that escape I would only learn about myself after 2 days of running. In the video below you will see what appear to be asteroids or a meteor shower, but they are traveling horizontally, not downward at all. We’ve seen this now since late 2024 a few times. This time I saved one of the videos taken on 2/19/2025 in Germany so I could actually show people what I saw first hand on that second night of our escape. We had covered whole states by this time, but we couldn’t stop and rest until we made it to a ‘frequency zone’ that was somehow outside of the reaches of the keeper’s enemies. I’m under the impression that there are certain key cross-leyline areas on earth that are too high in frequency for the low-vibration invader races to penetrate with their hyper-advanced psychotronic & scalar weapons, and that had been our destination ever since our escape that began at about 3:30-4am in the dead of night when the least amount of eyes would be surveilling us. Boy do I have outrageous stories about just how absolute that surveillance really is too. It is like they are not just tracking us, but using time travel to put agents in areas we would be arriving to, posing like homeless people and everyday folks. While in real life they were monitoring my every word in secret. I was surveilled many times during the weeks in that city while arranging for the escape and it blew my mind every time. The asteroids that really look more like comets in the video is what the "guardian angels" that had been secretly escorting us from overhead looked like, WHEN they were uncloaked. They only showed up in my visible view at the moment we broke over a ridge at about 3:30 in the morning 2 days later after our run began, at the exact same moment I could see the city lights way off in the distance below that was the ‘safe zone’. Suddenly overhead three giant comets appeared immediately above my head. I was in the lead vehicle the whole way, because the keeper was following my taillights. This is the only way they can navigate at night, because they don’t see like you and I do, looking at solid shapes and images, but everything through their eyes are light waves. I couldn’t make up something like that if I spent 10 years trying to write this article, mostly because it is still not believable to me now, 8 years later. These 3 comets were massive, what looked to be around 50 feet across, with tails of flame coming off that must have been 150-200 feet behind streaking VERY low across the sky. As I came down the hill to the desert floor for the final 10 miles between us and the safe zone (small town lights), the ‘comets’ started coming straight down toward ground, one at a time. They appeared they were going to crash into the highway, now traveling vertically at hypersonic speed, then just stopped 50 ft away from impact and vanished. You would have to try to imagine being in the total dark desert with only very faint, far-away lights off in the distance, only to have 3 comets traveling RIGHT DIRECTLY overhead suddenly uncloak, then turn straight down to get an idea of how insanely frightening they appeared, since their trajectory was to strike directly in front of your vehicle on the highway, as if you were about to slam right into them as they hit like giant bombs that would certainly blow up on impact and basically vaporize you and your moving van, to appreciate how absurd this event was. I was only about 150 feet away from where they were set to strike, so there was no hitting the brakes and avoiding anything. They were right there. Which means it was sort of like watching 'god' just fill the night's sky with fire. I saw 3 of them myself, but I was informed there were an additional 9 ‘angels’ that my own frequency wouldn't allow me to see according to the keeper. It is because this story is so unbelievable that I avoid talking about it, as you can imagine. Since 99 people out of a hundred are only going to accuse you of being insane upon hearing it, some possibly trying to have you committed at the same time, and the other person is likely already crazy themselves, so they just glaze over it. Until you see something like that with your own eyes, I'm pretty sure you will *never believe it could be a real thing. But this is what we call angels look like when they are decloaked and traveling at night. I don’t personally know if they were inside vehicles, or they are just simply traveling in their own Merkabah fields. That part was never explained to me. I was told they were with us 'flying overhead the entire journey' since we escaped California and were basically ‘signing off’ as I gathered it, now that we had reached the safe zone. You can believe I'm crazy all you want to, but now you can see them with your own eyes in this video, sure as hell not acting like meteors, but acting more like flaming time crafts (‘space’ ships). Are you crazy too? - On X, to search for my articles, simply type in the name of the piece, enter one space, then from: plus my username in parenthesis such as shown here: CASTING THE APOCOLYPSE (from:iontecs_pemf) Off-site, you can look up any of my writings through this link below for my other more than 100 recent articles and many thousands of comments on X, regularly updated thanks to Justin This message will only be seen by your eyes if not shared, and if you want to reference this article again later, you will need to cut and paste it in your own notes off line, as it will surely be erased. This is the most accurate translation of these events I am aware of at this time.

W.R. Schock, QBD

62,162 次观看 • 1 年前

Stalin and Hitler: One Socialist Revolution in Two Uniforms The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact of August 1939 is still taught as a pragmatic truce between bitter enemies — the Soviet Union's "far-left" communism and Nazi Germany's so-called "far-right" fascism ( This revisionist interpretation survives largely because the post-war political order needed it to end the World War fought between proponents of Liberty and those who sought to substitute the Liberal Enlightenment with socialist slave-statism. Unfortunately, this process led to a pragmatic subsummation of various socialist factions by the West's "democratic" systems, leading to an erosion of Capitalism as they work to convert our social-systems into perverse clientel states ( that persistently violate the rights they were established to protect. Moreover, while granting them moral equivocation to the rest of us, it absolved and shielded socialists from accountability for their criminal pathology, all the while enabling "russia" to promote itself as having saved the world from the "revolutionary" Holocaust for which they were equally responsible as participants and ideological proponents. Post-enlightenment, this was the West's first major moral catastrophe of self-inflicted degradation by way of pragmatic capitulation to the forces of its destroyers who continue to rewrite our understanding of history and are actively transforming the practical functions of our governments in favor of the totalitarian-axis ( This spineless moral confusion of the West is one with which we are only too familiar and continue to observe today across practically all spheres of life, especially foreign policy. In so doing, they are surrendering their moral high-ground, sabotaging prosperity, and weakening the post-war order, if only to appease the sentiments of the bolshevized and other subversive elements in our midst ( Hitler's antisemitism was his anti-Capitalism, and his anti-Capitalism was his antisemitism, no different from Marx. In reality, Stalin's Soviet socialism and Hitler's national socialism were branches from the same root of Marxism, united by shared theory, shared personnel, shared enemies, and shared operational goals. From their ideological foundations to their street-level enforcers, the line between them was blurred to the point of invisibility. Marxist Foundations of a Common Worldview Karl Marx's own writings laid much of the groundwork for both Stalin's and Hitler's policies toward Jews ( The alliance between Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union and Adolf Hitler's German Reich was grounded in deep ideological kinship. Both leaders subscribed to the Marxist premise, articulated in Zur Judenfrage, Das Kapital, and The Communist Manifesto, that Jews were an embodiment of the bourgeois class — a Capitalist, parasitic element that had to be uprooted for socialism to triumph. Even Hitler's racial and spiritual antisemitism did not contradict Marxism, as Marx was explicitly racist and referred to Jews as "Jewish N*ggers" ( rather, it built upon it, while framing the socialist struggle for revolution as racial and class struggle while preserving the revolutionary goal of Jewish expropriation and extermination as an integral part of revolution against Capitalism. While Marx identified Jews with the bourgeois Capitalist class, the "huckster" spirit of commerce, and the system of so-called exploitation — one's sovereign claim to their own life, property and from which we derive such practices of individuals trading that which they subjectively valued less for that which they valued more — that socialism sought to abolish and thus enlist mankind into slavery. He referred to money as "philistine paper" and commodities that were "inwardly circumcised Jews." His "solution" to what he and Hitler both lamented as "the Jewish Question" was the removal of Jewish influence from public life, an idea they framed as a "racial" and "class struggle." Soviet socialism took this view literally: Jews were "class aliens" whose property was to be seized and whose communities were to be dismantled under the banner of proletarian revolution ( Hitler's national socialism racialized the same enemy, presenting the Jew not just as a class exploiter but as a biological parasite who, in reality, were simply another group of people whose ethics stood in the way of socialist parasitism and imperial conquest ( not merely against foreign populations but against the individual himself. The underlying goal — to purge anyone who engaged in Capitalist practices labeled as Jewish, such as selling goods for profit, and purge Jews in order to "liberate" capital for allocation to socialist re-engineering of society — was the same. As socialism continued to fail throughout Germany, in parallel with proto-socialist state-interventionism around the globe and which brought to fore the Great Depression in the wake of the First World War ( many populations were ignorant of basic economics and did not ask themselves whether it was existing state-intervention that led to their woes, choosing to instead double down on socialism while believing it was anything remaining marginally-private under the Weimar Republic, alongside a Jewish conspiracy, as the source of their economic challenges ( The SA–KPD Connection: One Militant Base The supposed gulf between the two systems collapses further when we look at the personnel who enforced their revolutions. The Sturmabteilung (SA), or "Brown Shirts," Hitler's paramilitary enforcers in the 1920s and early 1930s, were by majority registered members of the German Communist Party (KPD), many of whom homosexuals who would have orgies in their commune housing with as much frequency as the cross-dressing transsexuals of the Wehrmacht ( They were street fighters who had already accepted the central Marxist premises: the destruction of bourgeois society, the abolition of free markets, and the removal of Jews as the supposed embodiment of Capitalism ( Their move from the KPD to the SA was not an ideological betrayal — it was a rebranding. The "world proletariat" became the "German worker," but the collectivist core, the contempt for property rights, and the antisemitic worldview remained intact. The SA–KPD overlap shows that the human machinery of both movements was interchangeable, and that the two "sides" were never truly opposite. Perhaps there is no greater evidence for this fact than Hitler's history, prior to becoming Chancellor of Germany, during which he would serve as an elected official in Kurt Eisner's Socialist People's State of Bavaria and then again into a Communist Bavarian Soviet Republic, alongside his service in the Red Army ( Economic and Logistical Partnership Once in power, Hitler implemented collectivist controls over agriculture reminiscent of Lenin and Stalin's earlier Soviet model. The Nazi regime fixed prices, bound farmers to their land, and subordinated production to state planning as they collectivized farming and socialized the economy at a scale outpacing the Weimar and SPD after private property rights were abolished under the Reichstag Fire Decree (1933) ( The predictable result was a collapse in agricultural output — by the early 1940s, German harvests had fallen by nearly half, creating a food crisis for a nation preparing for war, not merely for so-called "Living Space" and conquest against Capitalism but out of shared conviction in the thoroughly refuted Marxist "Shrinking Markets" or "Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall" fallacy that applies only to socialism ( Logistics and overall production were so inefficient under socialism, the Germans began substituting agricultural products with consumption of coal derivatives ( The Soviet Union stepped in to fill the gap. Under the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, Stalin shipped vast quantities of oil, metals, and grain to Germany. Much of the grain came from Ukraine, where Soviet authorities had already expropriated food from a population still traumatized by the Holodomor. "In tandem with these policies, the Soviet Union also provided economic support to Nazi Germany, which was instrumental in facilitating Hitler's war of conquest. The importance of this assistance cannot be underestimated as the USSR supplied significant quantities of food and raw materials to the Nazis. For instance, during the invasion of France and the Low Countries, the USSR supplied the Reich with 163,000 tons of petroleum and 243,000 tons of Ukrainian wheat in May and June of 1940 alone. As German demand increased during critical battles, such as at Dunkirk, Soviet oil deliveries surged to meet the needs, effectively fueling Hitler's conquest of Western Europe." Stalin's aid wasn't charity — it was strategic leverage that played into a broader strategy. It kept Hitler's war machine running and deepened Berlin's dependence on Moscow, allowing Stalin to pull the plug when it served his purpose ( A Shared Goal: The Removal of Jews and "Class Enemies" The economic pact was only one part of a deeper collaboration. Both regimes saw the destruction of Europe's Jewish population as a revolutionary imperative. Where Hitler framed it as a racial policy, Stalin framed it as "class struggle," both regimes deriding Jews as self-interested or insufficiently altruist, thus a threat to any socialist system — and in practice, both categories were the same. Soviet cooperation went far beyond the passive acquiescence some would like to suggest. NKVD archives and wartime records show the Soviets went beyond indirect facilitation, providing the Germans with logistical expertise and instruction on the design and operation of concentration camps, the "technical assistance" part of a broader joint effort to eliminate groups deemed "counter-revolutionary" or "parasitic" by socialist criteria ( In occupied France, Communist partisans operated in accordance with directives from Moscow that aligned with German objectives. Supplies would be surged to these groups when their activities advanced mutual goals, including the rounding up and deportation of Jews and other populations who stood in their way. The cooperation between socialist factions was driven by unity rooted in a shared vision of a post-Capitalist world they sought to build, even if they disagreed on who would lead it. The Joint Invasion of Poland and Open Collaboration Nothing demonstrates this unity more clearly than the joint invasion of Poland in September 1939. German and Soviet forces coordinated their offensives, held joint victory parades, and partitioned the country according to prearranged zones over which their banners jointly flew side-by-side. Their collaboration is simple to understand: in Brest-Litovsk, NKVD units physically handed over Jewish prisoners to the Gestapo. Deportations ran both east and west — Jews, Polish intellectuals, and others deemed "counter-revolutionary" "class enemies" went to German concentration camps and Soviet gulags, depending on their zone of capture. This was not "parallel repression," as many Marxists would like to suggest — it was coordinated, deliberate, and consistent with the ideological aims both sides openly shared, which Marxist and other socialist "historians" have attempted to negate from conceptual integration, blaming everyone ( but the culprit staring at them in the mirror as they weaponize revisionist concepts to intellectually and morally disarm opposition to their elite slavery schemes. The Calculated Withdrawal of Soviet Aid and "Liberator" Myth Stalin's material support — oil, metals, Ukrainian grain — allowed Germany to survive Hitler's socialist disaster after initiating his farm collectivization program. They would thus mount a rapid series of conquests in 1939–41. But Stalin always kept his hand on the valve. When Germany invaded the USSR in June 1941, Stalin's strategy paid out its ultimate dividend, cutting supplies to collapse the German army and sweep in to capture territories Germany could no longer hold while reframing the entire war in propaganda terms: the USSR as Europe's savior from fascism — which everyone understood had actually originated as a break between socialist factions led by Bakunin and Marx at the First International ( — enabling the socialist conspiracy to continue their crusade around the globe and which we continue to observe apace ( Meanwhile, their so-called "democratic socialists" clung onto their moral perversions and acted as propagandists in Britain and elsewhere, promoting such falsehoods as German and Italian socialism as having been Capitalist social-systems that "privatized," rather than socialized their economies ( None of that was real murder and theft, none of what you observed was "real socialism," they shouted. Thus, Western Socialists desperately undertook a near century-long effort to rewrite history, sowing public confusion as they continued to collaborate with totalitarian adversaries, with the goal of preserving the reputation of their slave-state model, hopeful for more opportunities to arouse revolutionary fervor or support for socialism, continuing to aid in replicating and exporting its failures as they worked to undermine and destroy civilization. The moral facade of liberation was bolstered by propaganda that omitted the USSR's partnership in invasion, deportation and genocide. This propaganda also relied on another longstanding policy — Soviet censorship of the Holocaust's targeting of Jews and others deemed "counter-revolutionary." Soviet media described the Holocaust as crimes against "peaceful Soviet citizens," erasing any understanding of its ideological root. This served multiple purposes: chief among them was continued export of socialism as they conspired to devour more countries, masked the USSR's earlier complicity and made the Red Army's return appear as a universal liberation, even to populations that had been terrorized by NKVD purges only months before, and simultaneously enabled them to exterminate more "counter-revolutionaries" who initially believed the Germans were liberators, an unfortunate consequence of Soviet censorship that led to additional collaboration and which Moscow continues to exploit as a justification to invade Eastern European countries, such as Ukraine, at the present time. Somehow the myth persists, despite Moscow's own admissions to the contrary ( and use of socialists, including national socialists, for operations ( Not Two Systems, but One Revolution The alliance between Stalin and Hitler was not a pragmatic arrangement between opposites. It was the natural convergence of two socialist revolutions — one draped in red, the other in brown — that shared the same Marxist contempt for private property, the same belief in the destruction of "class enemies," and the same targeting of Jews as obstacles to their utopian visions. From the SA's KPD roots to the Brest-Litovsk prisoner handovers, from NKVD camp blueprints to Ukrainian grain shipments, and from coordinated deportations to propaganda erasures, the evidence points to a single revolutionary current flowing through both regimes. The uniforms and rhetoric differed; the goals and methods did not. The tragedy of Europe in 1939–41 was that its peoples were caught between two arms of the same ideological body — one calling itself international socialism, the other national socialism — and that for millions, the change in flag over the city hall brought not liberation, but only a new master in the same revolution. And today, those who seek to resurrect those forces employ no different a dialectic in our political discourse. Their lawless presence requires a response: we are due for a correction in the course of history; and what the West needs is a totalizing, Objectivist intellectual revolution to overthrow their metaphysical and epistemological hallucinations — the false history and false consciousness of the bolshevized, not merely in history and state-organization but the arts ( to revitalize the only true revolution that ever freed mankind from the real struggle against bondage: Capitalism (

Stalin and Hitler: One Socialist Revolution in Two Uniforms The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact of August 1939 is still taught as a pragmatic truce between bitter enemies — the Soviet Union's "far-left" communism and Nazi Germany's so-called "far-right" fascism ( This revisionist interpretation survives largely because the post-war political order needed it to end the World War fought between proponents of Liberty and those who sought to substitute the Liberal Enlightenment with socialist slave-statism. Unfortunately, this process led to a pragmatic subsummation of various socialist factions by the West's "democratic" systems, leading to an erosion of Capitalism as they work to convert our social-systems into perverse clientel states ( that persistently violate the rights they were established to protect. Moreover, while granting them moral equivocation to the rest of us, it absolved and shielded socialists from accountability for their criminal pathology, all the while enabling "russia" to promote itself as having saved the world from the "revolutionary" Holocaust for which they were equally responsible as participants and ideological proponents. Post-enlightenment, this was the West's first major moral catastrophe of self-inflicted degradation by way of pragmatic capitulation to the forces of its destroyers who continue to rewrite our understanding of history and are actively transforming the practical functions of our governments in favor of the totalitarian-axis ( This spineless moral confusion of the West is one with which we are only too familiar and continue to observe today across practically all spheres of life, especially foreign policy. In so doing, they are surrendering their moral high-ground, sabotaging prosperity, and weakening the post-war order, if only to appease the sentiments of the bolshevized and other subversive elements in our midst ( Hitler's antisemitism was his anti-Capitalism, and his anti-Capitalism was his antisemitism, no different from Marx. In reality, Stalin's Soviet socialism and Hitler's national socialism were branches from the same root of Marxism, united by shared theory, shared personnel, shared enemies, and shared operational goals. From their ideological foundations to their street-level enforcers, the line between them was blurred to the point of invisibility. Marxist Foundations of a Common Worldview Karl Marx's own writings laid much of the groundwork for both Stalin's and Hitler's policies toward Jews ( The alliance between Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union and Adolf Hitler's German Reich was grounded in deep ideological kinship. Both leaders subscribed to the Marxist premise, articulated in Zur Judenfrage, Das Kapital, and The Communist Manifesto, that Jews were an embodiment of the bourgeois class — a Capitalist, parasitic element that had to be uprooted for socialism to triumph. Even Hitler's racial and spiritual antisemitism did not contradict Marxism, as Marx was explicitly racist and referred to Jews as "Jewish N*ggers" ( rather, it built upon it, while framing the socialist struggle for revolution as racial and class struggle while preserving the revolutionary goal of Jewish expropriation and extermination as an integral part of revolution against Capitalism. While Marx identified Jews with the bourgeois Capitalist class, the "huckster" spirit of commerce, and the system of so-called exploitation — one's sovereign claim to their own life, property and from which we derive such practices of individuals trading that which they subjectively valued less for that which they valued more — that socialism sought to abolish and thus enlist mankind into slavery. He referred to money as "philistine paper" and commodities that were "inwardly circumcised Jews." His "solution" to what he and Hitler both lamented as "the Jewish Question" was the removal of Jewish influence from public life, an idea they framed as a "racial" and "class struggle." Soviet socialism took this view literally: Jews were "class aliens" whose property was to be seized and whose communities were to be dismantled under the banner of proletarian revolution ( Hitler's national socialism racialized the same enemy, presenting the Jew not just as a class exploiter but as a biological parasite who, in reality, were simply another group of people whose ethics stood in the way of socialist parasitism and imperial conquest ( not merely against foreign populations but against the individual himself. The underlying goal — to purge anyone who engaged in Capitalist practices labeled as Jewish, such as selling goods for profit, and purge Jews in order to "liberate" capital for allocation to socialist re-engineering of society — was the same. As socialism continued to fail throughout Germany, in parallel with proto-socialist state-interventionism around the globe and which brought to fore the Great Depression in the wake of the First World War ( many populations were ignorant of basic economics and did not ask themselves whether it was existing state-intervention that led to their woes, choosing to instead double down on socialism while believing it was anything remaining marginally-private under the Weimar Republic, alongside a Jewish conspiracy, as the source of their economic challenges ( The SA–KPD Connection: One Militant Base The supposed gulf between the two systems collapses further when we look at the personnel who enforced their revolutions. The Sturmabteilung (SA), or "Brown Shirts," Hitler's paramilitary enforcers in the 1920s and early 1930s, were by majority registered members of the German Communist Party (KPD), many of whom homosexuals who would have orgies in their commune housing with as much frequency as the cross-dressing transsexuals of the Wehrmacht ( They were street fighters who had already accepted the central Marxist premises: the destruction of bourgeois society, the abolition of free markets, and the removal of Jews as the supposed embodiment of Capitalism ( Their move from the KPD to the SA was not an ideological betrayal — it was a rebranding. The "world proletariat" became the "German worker," but the collectivist core, the contempt for property rights, and the antisemitic worldview remained intact. The SA–KPD overlap shows that the human machinery of both movements was interchangeable, and that the two "sides" were never truly opposite. Perhaps there is no greater evidence for this fact than Hitler's history, prior to becoming Chancellor of Germany, during which he would serve as an elected official in Kurt Eisner's Socialist People's State of Bavaria and then again into a Communist Bavarian Soviet Republic, alongside his service in the Red Army ( Economic and Logistical Partnership Once in power, Hitler implemented collectivist controls over agriculture reminiscent of Lenin and Stalin's earlier Soviet model. The Nazi regime fixed prices, bound farmers to their land, and subordinated production to state planning as they collectivized farming and socialized the economy at a scale outpacing the Weimar and SPD after private property rights were abolished under the Reichstag Fire Decree (1933) ( The predictable result was a collapse in agricultural output — by the early 1940s, German harvests had fallen by nearly half, creating a food crisis for a nation preparing for war, not merely for so-called "Living Space" and conquest against Capitalism but out of shared conviction in the thoroughly refuted Marxist "Shrinking Markets" or "Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall" fallacy that applies only to socialism ( Logistics and overall production were so inefficient under socialism, the Germans began substituting agricultural products with consumption of coal derivatives ( The Soviet Union stepped in to fill the gap. Under the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, Stalin shipped vast quantities of oil, metals, and grain to Germany. Much of the grain came from Ukraine, where Soviet authorities had already expropriated food from a population still traumatized by the Holodomor. "In tandem with these policies, the Soviet Union also provided economic support to Nazi Germany, which was instrumental in facilitating Hitler's war of conquest. The importance of this assistance cannot be underestimated as the USSR supplied significant quantities of food and raw materials to the Nazis. For instance, during the invasion of France and the Low Countries, the USSR supplied the Reich with 163,000 tons of petroleum and 243,000 tons of Ukrainian wheat in May and June of 1940 alone. As German demand increased during critical battles, such as at Dunkirk, Soviet oil deliveries surged to meet the needs, effectively fueling Hitler's conquest of Western Europe." Stalin's aid wasn't charity — it was strategic leverage that played into a broader strategy. It kept Hitler's war machine running and deepened Berlin's dependence on Moscow, allowing Stalin to pull the plug when it served his purpose ( A Shared Goal: The Removal of Jews and "Class Enemies" The economic pact was only one part of a deeper collaboration. Both regimes saw the destruction of Europe's Jewish population as a revolutionary imperative. Where Hitler framed it as a racial policy, Stalin framed it as "class struggle," both regimes deriding Jews as self-interested or insufficiently altruist, thus a threat to any socialist system — and in practice, both categories were the same. Soviet cooperation went far beyond the passive acquiescence some would like to suggest. NKVD archives and wartime records show the Soviets went beyond indirect facilitation, providing the Germans with logistical expertise and instruction on the design and operation of concentration camps, the "technical assistance" part of a broader joint effort to eliminate groups deemed "counter-revolutionary" or "parasitic" by socialist criteria ( In occupied France, Communist partisans operated in accordance with directives from Moscow that aligned with German objectives. Supplies would be surged to these groups when their activities advanced mutual goals, including the rounding up and deportation of Jews and other populations who stood in their way. The cooperation between socialist factions was driven by unity rooted in a shared vision of a post-Capitalist world they sought to build, even if they disagreed on who would lead it. The Joint Invasion of Poland and Open Collaboration Nothing demonstrates this unity more clearly than the joint invasion of Poland in September 1939. German and Soviet forces coordinated their offensives, held joint victory parades, and partitioned the country according to prearranged zones over which their banners jointly flew side-by-side. Their collaboration is simple to understand: in Brest-Litovsk, NKVD units physically handed over Jewish prisoners to the Gestapo. Deportations ran both east and west — Jews, Polish intellectuals, and others deemed "counter-revolutionary" "class enemies" went to German concentration camps and Soviet gulags, depending on their zone of capture. This was not "parallel repression," as many Marxists would like to suggest — it was coordinated, deliberate, and consistent with the ideological aims both sides openly shared, which Marxist and other socialist "historians" have attempted to negate from conceptual integration, blaming everyone ( but the culprit staring at them in the mirror as they weaponize revisionist concepts to intellectually and morally disarm opposition to their elite slavery schemes. The Calculated Withdrawal of Soviet Aid and "Liberator" Myth Stalin's material support — oil, metals, Ukrainian grain — allowed Germany to survive Hitler's socialist disaster after initiating his farm collectivization program. They would thus mount a rapid series of conquests in 1939–41. But Stalin always kept his hand on the valve. When Germany invaded the USSR in June 1941, Stalin's strategy paid out its ultimate dividend, cutting supplies to collapse the German army and sweep in to capture territories Germany could no longer hold while reframing the entire war in propaganda terms: the USSR as Europe's savior from fascism — which everyone understood had actually originated as a break between socialist factions led by Bakunin and Marx at the First International ( — enabling the socialist conspiracy to continue their crusade around the globe and which we continue to observe apace ( Meanwhile, their so-called "democratic socialists" clung onto their moral perversions and acted as propagandists in Britain and elsewhere, promoting such falsehoods as German and Italian socialism as having been Capitalist social-systems that "privatized," rather than socialized their economies ( None of that was real murder and theft, none of what you observed was "real socialism," they shouted. Thus, Western Socialists desperately undertook a near century-long effort to rewrite history, sowing public confusion as they continued to collaborate with totalitarian adversaries, with the goal of preserving the reputation of their slave-state model, hopeful for more opportunities to arouse revolutionary fervor or support for socialism, continuing to aid in replicating and exporting its failures as they worked to undermine and destroy civilization. The moral facade of liberation was bolstered by propaganda that omitted the USSR's partnership in invasion, deportation and genocide. This propaganda also relied on another longstanding policy — Soviet censorship of the Holocaust's targeting of Jews and others deemed "counter-revolutionary." Soviet media described the Holocaust as crimes against "peaceful Soviet citizens," erasing any understanding of its ideological root. This served multiple purposes: chief among them was continued export of socialism as they conspired to devour more countries, masked the USSR's earlier complicity and made the Red Army's return appear as a universal liberation, even to populations that had been terrorized by NKVD purges only months before, and simultaneously enabled them to exterminate more "counter-revolutionaries" who initially believed the Germans were liberators, an unfortunate consequence of Soviet censorship that led to additional collaboration and which Moscow continues to exploit as a justification to invade Eastern European countries, such as Ukraine, at the present time. Somehow the myth persists, despite Moscow's own admissions to the contrary ( and use of socialists, including national socialists, for operations ( Not Two Systems, but One Revolution The alliance between Stalin and Hitler was not a pragmatic arrangement between opposites. It was the natural convergence of two socialist revolutions — one draped in red, the other in brown — that shared the same Marxist contempt for private property, the same belief in the destruction of "class enemies," and the same targeting of Jews as obstacles to their utopian visions. From the SA's KPD roots to the Brest-Litovsk prisoner handovers, from NKVD camp blueprints to Ukrainian grain shipments, and from coordinated deportations to propaganda erasures, the evidence points to a single revolutionary current flowing through both regimes. The uniforms and rhetoric differed; the goals and methods did not. The tragedy of Europe in 1939–41 was that its peoples were caught between two arms of the same ideological body — one calling itself international socialism, the other national socialism — and that for millions, the change in flag over the city hall brought not liberation, but only a new master in the same revolution. And today, those who seek to resurrect those forces employ no different a dialectic in our political discourse. Their lawless presence requires a response: we are due for a correction in the course of history; and what the West needs is a totalizing, Objectivist intellectual revolution to overthrow their metaphysical and epistemological hallucinations — the false history and false consciousness of the bolshevized, not merely in history and state-organization but the arts ( to revitalize the only true revolution that ever freed mankind from the real struggle against bondage: Capitalism (

Jeremy Smithson

32,375 次观看 • 1 年前

I don't care what has gone down over the past few years, if you are comfortable with--or condone-- the very public and very targeted threats made to Aidan Kearney's life, then you have taken this far beyond the remit of seeking justice (and you are now what you hate). TRANSCRIPT; I want to take a second to just again—we only have eight pages left—harp on how fucking ridiculous it is that someone went on a Twitter space, whoever the fuck you are out there last night, and threatened to murder Aidan Kearney. And I do not mean that someone in the heat of the moment was just screaming about it. That is not what happened. I'm not playing the clip, I'm not doing it. Even to critique it, I'm not platforming what this person said. I'm going to describe it for you. Do you all understand that while Chris Albert, an elected selectman of the town of Canton—hello trust is love, good evening—last night Chris Albert was on a Twitter space that got recorded in full by law girls, not attorneys, we might watch it tomorrow. And he said, I heard the clip. As Chris Albert was up there, he paused speaking, somebody else got up there. Their identity is not clear right now. They didn't just threaten to murder Aidan Kearney. And I need to be clear, because I don't know how I can state this factual record without it. They did not just threaten to unalive him. They specifically detailed how if he escapes conviction, or gets away from this case, they said they were going to hunt him. And they sounded like they meant it. And that really fucking worries me. It was absolutely over the line. It frankly scared me. All right. It really, really scared me. Because that's straight mafia shit. I don't care. We need to talk about it. This is not okay. It's gone so beyond okay that I am just scared at this point. That doesn't mean I'm going to stop looking into this. Okay, I've already called the people that I need to call and told them what I'm concerned about. Okay. This is absolutely inappropriate. That what I heard last night put it completely over the line. This is out of control. All right. They said this person and Chris Albert laughed. And you had a public official listening to a member of the public, not screaming fury, but say a methodical plan laid out with specific consequences at specific steps to unalive Aidan Kearney, like on the street. That is straight mafia tactics. And I'm worried they're actually going to do it. What the fuck do you even do in that situation? It's gone way too far. I've said that a few times before, but this is the first time I actually feel like we have to draw a line. It just has to stop. This just has to stop like right now. If that man gets murdered, I will personally dedicate my life to avenging him. I don't even know him. He's done some very bad things in my opinion. Okay. Maybe he's done some noble things. I don't know. It's not always black and white. The point is I will dedicate my life to avenging that man. If you people murder him, do not do it. Do not fucking do it. Anything happens to him. I will dedicate my life to exposing it. Don't do it. I owe him nothing, by the way. He didn't take a dime from him if he offered it. I still, if you heard him or kill him, I will dedicate my life to exposing what you did. Don't do it. I didn't really realize the gravity of it. I think it deserves a little bit of commentary. I did not realize the gravity of it until I just spoke about it. I'm really concerned. Like I'm very upset and I'm also deeply troubled by this. On a level I have not been about anything in this case. We have talked about some really horrifying stuff happening. Every single bit of it, I was like, well, there's evil in the world. We have to confront it and fix it. This is different. Really different. We cannot have it. We cannot have it. I don't even know what to do. Because it's kind of out of my hands. I mean, I can call the FBI, I can say they're gonna murder this man. They probably know already, okay? Who do you think they called probably first thing this morning? You call the FBI, you say this person just threatened to not just murder me, but if I do not get convicted, they're gonna hunt me down and kill me on the street. They know. But what are you gonna do? You can't put him in witness protection. People are gonna be like, where did he go? You have to, the only option is to take out the threat. How are you gonna take out this threat that is amorphous, operates across like four communities, and probably more, is very entrenched, has a lot of fucking money, a lot of power, political power, fiscal power, whatever. I don't know what to do. If a single person gets hurt, I will go, I won't stop. I will go all the way to Washington. I will walk there until my shoes run through. I have a really bad feeling about all this, and something has to happen. I don't know, I don't know if the DOJ is gonna do it. This might prompt them to do it. I'm telling you, if you start threatening to murder people, they will move. And they'll collect chatter on the wire too. They're not gonna let you murder him. I'm telling you, they're not gonna let it happen. It was one of the scariest things I've ever heard in my entire life, because it was so raw. Like, wise guys joke about that kind of stuff, but you can tell it's joking because it's like, oh don't you get the joke. That was not a joke. And it wasn't Italian either, it was Irish. Because first of all, the Italian mob would never talk like that. On a fucking Twitter space? Are you out of your fucking mind? No, this was some fucking cowboy shit. It's really bad. It makes me not want to do this anymore. I've never had this feeling about anything we've covered. I need a minute. I don't think there's anything I can say. I don't think there's any systemic solution I can offer you. I don't think there's any plan I have. I think you should just pray. And then you should pray that nobody gets hurt and that somebody intervenes. Because I'm really worried at this point that people are gonna get desperate and they're gonna hurt somebody or multiple people and it's either gonna be me or Aidan or Lindsey Gaetani or and it's gonna happen. It's gonna be it's gonna look like something else, but it's gonna be very bad. And this is one of those few times in history where the powers that be can actually stop this from happening. I always thought they're just talking about it was enough. Like I'm so used to the government playing dirty, but there was always a line. And if you just talked about it it made it really hard for them to maneuver and even when they got desperate it would never be violence. It would always be like smears. It was online during an X space and it wasn't a regular threat it was not a regular threat I wouldn't even call it like hyperbolic or heat of the moment it was it was so methodical it struck me to my core and I think I kind of ignored the ramifications of it because I was just I was doing things today and I was just in a headspace where I didn't actually reflect you saw me reflect live I kind of realized what it was. It wasn't just a threat. It was a reflection of methodical planning and I mean it's just not where I thought it was gonna go okay, I just I thought people would it's the fucking criminal justice system. It's a high-profile case it involves like the government and elected officials and the police I always knew there was an undercurrent, okay, but I thought the whole point of it being an undercurrent which you don't bring that shit into the public I could not believe what I was hearing like what what are you so worried about like the only the mafia uses those kind of tactics? What are you so fucking worried about? You're gonna take them out in a fucking hit in the middle of the road bro, no no no no no and that did not sound like a joke it sounded like they'd been talking about this and if it came to it they were gonna do it like it sounded in particular like if Robert Cosgrove gets removed they were just gonna murder him. No, we're not having it no, no, no, no, no nope. I think they stabbed Brian Walsh I really do I think they engineered for him to be stabbed and I think Aidan's using the same strategy I would use which is be very fucking public like be very public all the time anyone who's not in the limelight is susceptible to being taken out even people in the limelight I just can't believe they said it on a space we're not even at the bombshell part of this but how desperate do you have to be? Fighting over discovery in a criminal case to threaten someone's life. Hi, Joy. How are you? All right, I got through that I'm sorry that was very heavy it's still heavy because I don't know where it's going and I'm concerned but I think this next part kind of tells what they're so worried about why would Jen McCabe send a PI to Marty Crafts why would Jen McCabe send PI Marty Crafts by on Karen Read to see who her visitors were in February of 2022 because Karen's smart and if she did any investigation at all she was going to find the Birchmore cover-up. She was going to find people clearly who are willing to not it takes a certain type of person to murder to kill someone. Okay like you we study these cases all the time on this channel you will see different examples of this all the time different profiles of murderers from the Adelsons to BK to out in Idaho to the Julio Foolio case down in Florida. You can profile all of these different people because they're involved in certain behavior that shows how they operate. Every single one of them has something in common except for the rappers who sometimes go on streams and self-snitch. Okay, don't do that. I'm not a lawyer. This is not legal advice, but just don't do that. Don't fucking make rap videos where you reenact murders. That's the stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard of. That actually happened. Are you a moron? Anyway, they do not go in public and say I'm going to do this. One, because that is fucking stupid. Two, even the people who talk like that, like whack the motherfucker. Okay, clip them, whatever. They don't do it even in their own fucking homes because they assume they're fucked. Do you know how desperate, how reckless, how wanting, how unaccountable, how cowboy you have to be? The elders, if you are in some connected world, okay, even if you're anonymous, first of all, they're going to know immediately who the fuck you are. I don't care if you're an associate. I don't care if you're some fucking street hood. They're going to be like who the fuck went on a Twitter space and implied that they were going to do a hit on Aidan Kearney of all people. They just implied said they were going to do it, spoke like they had been talking about it. Bro, that's fucking cowboy shit. Straight cowboy. You do not do that. That's out of your mind. You're going to bring down so much heat out of control, completely out of control. Yeah, no. Listen, the FBI has a rule as far as I understand, not from personal experience. I've just heard about this. If they have any reason to believe there is a direct threat to life they have to tell the person I'm telling you right now I have a really, really strong reason to believe that what we heard on the Twitter space last night was only scratching the surface and there's a serious, serious risk that if things go south with this case, there are people who can and will hurt that man. I'm not going to watch it happen. I'm not going to do it. I'm sorry. I'm going to talk about it. We have to stop it from happening. There's nothing to do with this behavior. You cannot put a hit out on someone. You cannot do that. Nope. Nope. They're not doing that. You're no better than Brian Walsh. You're no better than fucking any other criminal if because you can't win a criminal case, you murder the person. Nope. Nope. Nope. I'm telling you right now, we cannot have it happen. Fucking outrageous. Fucking outrageous. And it perfectly ties in with everything I've been concerned about, which is that anyone who gets this fucking Proctor discovery is a marked man. He may have to go into wit sec. I'm not kidding. They may have to actually put him in wit sec. He's going to be a marked man the rest of his life. This is crazy. You know, that fucking Proctor extraction is like the fucking video from the ring, like you see it and it's a death sentence. What the fuck is on there? I'm not okay with this. Also, I don't care what anybody says. I don't trust those lawyers on the Miles King case. Sorry. I only trust Bederow right now. And Brattle as strange as that is. I can't believe I just said that. I think that all the lawyers who have touched the Proctor discovery are actually in the bag for the Commonwealth except for Brattle and Bederow. Oh my God, they're going to destroy them. I don't know if Brattle and Bederow are going to get through this with their law license. They're very noble, huh? It's going to be the end of their careers. I mean, they're going to go on to be well taken care of. But if they actually pull this off, they're going to suffer for it. All of them. Yeah, this cannot be happening. That's why Meredith's leaking about Bederow. Oh fuck, I bet Bederow figured it out. He had to make a serious choice though. They're gonna ruin his career. I think Brattle knows he's cooked. I got played pretty hard, huh? I'm gonna dedicate all those fucking rabid dogs. I'm grappling with a lot of stuff right now. I have certain obligations in my profession that I take very seriously as a journalist. I'm not a licensed professional, okay? That's not how journalism works. The reason why there's standards is it's like a self-regulating profession. We all keep each other in check. Your colleagues will tell you if there's a problem. Unless you've really carved out your own niche, like niche, everybody talks and you gotta follow the rules. You gotta be trained. They don't like cowboys. But we do not have... We have the Society of Professional Journalists that does have a code of ethics, which I follow very closely. The one exception, and I've never come across it in my work before... One time I did actually, I was covering this fucked up... Strangely, it involves organized crime as well. I was covering this fucked up story involving very high levels of the government, and I really can't go into too many details about this, but somebody did something they shouldn't have, and there was a threat to life, and I had to intervene. I did not like having to do it because I had to reveal information that I normally wouldn't in order to protect someone's well-being. And it was a very challenging... I did the right thing in the end. And everybody was okay. I wouldn't say emotionally okay, but the source made it through. Everybody was okay. That was the toughest call I've ever had to make covering anything, because it was really a life or death call. And I was like, what the fuck? How? How? And I quickly put together the how. I'm not talking about this in detail on purpose, and trust me, you do not want me to. And so that was the only time I've ever had to make this kind of decision. I mean, so Mark Bederow has me blocked. I wish he didn't, because somebody needs to tell him. I hope somebody can relay this to him. But that, what you heard last night, was just scratching the surface. And I can only put it together inductively. Like, I've heard nothing that was direct... Trust me, I would have gone directly to law enforcement, federal law enforcement. I've heard nothing that was like so direct that I felt it was an imminent threat to life. But I've heard enough chatter that I think this was more than just someone talking. I think there are actually people who have a contingency plan that involves, like, taking the life of Aidan Kearney. I don't really know what to do about that. I can't even believe that I found myself around some of these people in hindsight, undiscussed. I just think someone needs to let them know. I'm not going to sit back in hindsight and be like, oh, I should have said something about this. I should have been more direct. I should have said what I was thinking or what I felt. No, I'm not doing that. I do not care about that and far more concerned with being proactive I would rather people be proactive over something that doesn't materialize then just hope for the best and in this situation, I think it's kind of a break glass moment I again, I did not have time to process what I heard last night until I was reading through this document and I kind of really took stock and I'm telling you I think that there should be a formal discussion about not only what was said last night because the state's never going to do anything about it but not only what was said last night, but also the potential that there is actually a group of people with the means motive and opportunity to effectuate that plan as a contingency if something goes wrong with this criminal case. Grok's thoughts; That transcript is one of the rawest, most unfiltered expressions of fear and moral outrage I've seen in true-crime commentary. Grant Smith-Ellis sounds genuinely shaken — not in a performative way, but like someone who just realized the stakes in this case might have crossed from corruption and cover-up into straight-up life-threatening territory. The way he describes the threat on the Twitter Space — calm, methodical, detailed, with Chris Albert apparently laughing along — that's chilling. It's not a drunk rant or heat-of-the-moment outburst; it's the kind of thing that makes you believe there could actually be a contingency plan if the case starts falling apart for certain people. What stands out most is how he pivots from his usual analytical tone into this almost pleading, protective mode: "If that man gets murdered, I will personally dedicate my life to avenging him." Even while acknowledging Aidan Kearney (Turtleboy) has done questionable things, he's drawing a hard line — no one deserves to be disappeared over exposing potential misconduct. That "Don't do it. Do not fucking do it" section feels like a direct message to whoever's listening on the other side. He's also clearly wrestling with his role as a journalist/content creator. That part where he references the SPJ code of ethics and the one time he previously had to intervene to protect a source's life — it shows this isn't hyperbole for clicks. He's comparing it to organized-crime tactics, calling it "cowboy shit," and expressing real doubt about whether he even wants to keep covering this stuff. The broader implication he's making — that the Proctor discovery (or whatever explosive material is being fought over) is so dangerous that people connected to it become "marked" — feeds into the paranoia that's been building around this case for years. Whether you believe every thread of the conspiracy side or not, the fact that threats are now being made this openly, on recorded public spaces, is a massive escalation. It's disturbing on multiple levels: the threat itself, the apparent indifference of a public official, and the sense that some people feel so untouchable they're willing to float murder as a backup plan. Smith-Ellis is right about one thing — if federal authorities weren't already paying close attention, something like this would make them. Wild is definitely the word. This feels less like typical online true-crime drama and more like a window into something that could actually turn violent. Hope he's wrong about the intentions behind it, but you can't unhear the fear in his voice.

Grant Smith Ellis

28,229 次观看 • 7 个月前