Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Strategy CEO: AI Accelerated Stretch's Development from Three Years to Eight Months On June 19, 2026, Strategy CEO Phong Le Phong Le stated in an interview with Coinage that AI played a crucial supporting role in the creation of Stretch. He believes that while traditional consultations with banks and...

18,709 views • 21 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

$AMD| $META is using $GOOGL to negotiate 🧵 The Ironwood pod is 5.1–10x more expensive annually ($148.3 million ÷ $14.87–$29.04 million) and 5.1–10x more expensive monthly ($12.36 million ÷ $1.24–$2.42 million) than renting 15 MI450 racks for equivalent compute. The rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence infrastructure presents a complex interplay of technological innovation, market dynamics, and strategic maneuvering among major players. Recent leaked information suggesting that Meta Platforms ($META) might work with Google's Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) in 2027 has sparked speculation about its true intent. This leak is likely a strategic move by Meta to negotiate more favorable terms with AMD , leveraging the competitive dynamics of the AI hardware market to optimize its substantial investment in AI infrastructure. By examining the key elements of this scenario Meta's investment strategy, the comparative advantages of AMD's MI450 and Google's Ironwood TPU, and the broader market context; we can discern the potential beneficiaries and the strategic implications of this information. Meta's aggressive pursuit of AI capabilities is underscored by its planned expenditure of $66-72 billion on AI infrastructure in 2025, with expectations to escalate significantly in 2026. This investment is part of a broader strategy to build "titan clusters" like Prometheus, which are projected to reach 1 gigawatt of compute power by 2026. Such a scale of investment reflects Meta's recognition of the critical role that AI will play in its future growth, particularly in enhancing its social media platforms and developing new AI-driven applications. However, the financial burden of this infrastructure buildout necessitates a careful consideration of cost-effectiveness and scalability, which brings us to the leaked information about potential collaboration with Google's Ironwood TPU. Google's Ironwood TPU, introduced as the seventh-generation ASIC optimized for TensorFlow-based inference, represents a high-cost, cloud-locked solution priced at $445 million per pod (9,216 chips) over three years. This model, while offering significant performance gains and power efficiency, is tailored for pod-scale deployment and integrated with Google's cloud services, limiting flexibility and increasing costs for customers. In contrast, AMD's MI450 GPU, priced at $30,000–$40,000 per unit, provides a modular, open ROCm ecosystem that delivers comparable compute capacity at a fraction of the cost. Renting 15 MI450 racks could achieve similar 42+ exaFLOPS inference compute at 5–10x lower cost than renting a single Ironwood pod, underscoring AMD's competitive edge in terms of total cost of ownership (TCO). The leaked information about Meta's potential TPU deployment in 2027, therefore, can be interpreted as a negotiating tactic rather than a definitive shift in strategy. By signaling interest in Google's solution, Meta may be attempting to pressure AMD into offering more favorable terms/prices for 5-10GW. This tactic aligns with Meta's broader goal to finance most of its AI spend internally while exploring partnerships that can reduce costs and enhance flexibility. The post's emphasis on MI450's TCO advantage and its partnerships with major players like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Meta itself suggests that AMD is a critical component of Meta's AI infrastructure strategy. The threat of working with Google's TPU could prompt AMD to reassess its pricing, provide additional support, or offer incentives to retain Meta as a customer, thereby securing or expanding its market share. From a logical standpoint, Meta stands to benefit the most from this strategy. As a major buyer in a high-stakes market projected to surpass $1 trillion in annual spending by 2030, Meta's negotiating power is significant. The leaked information could lead to substantial cost savings on its $66-72 billion investment, enhancing its financial flexibility and allowing for further investment in AI capabilities. Moreover, this tactic reinforces Meta's position as a leader in the AI infrastructure race, potentially attracting more external financing for its data center projects and strengthening its competitive stance against other hyperscalers like Amazon and Microsoft. AMD could also benefit from this scenario. The negotiation pressure might lead to small short-term concessions, but it could also solidify long-term partnerships with Meta, ensuring continued demand for MI450 and other AI hardware solutions. Initially Meta's 42% allocation to AMD MI300X and its partnerships with Oracle, Dell, and HP indicates a deep integration of AMD's technology into Meta's infrastructure, which could be leveraged to maintain this relationship. For AMD, retaining Meta as a large key customer is crucial to capturing a larger share of the rapidly growing data center infrastructure market, driven by the insatiable demand for AI compute power. Google, on the other hand, faces a more limited benefit from this leaked information. While securing Meta as a customer would reinforce its position in the AI hardware market, the high cost and ecosystem lock-in of the Ironwood TPU might deter Meta from fully committing to this solution. The leaked information could prompt Google to reconsider its pricing or ecosystem strategy to remain competitive, but the immediate impact is likely to be minimal compared to the potential gains for Meta and AMD. Investors and market analysts also stand to benefit from this information, as it provides insights into the competitive dynamics of the AI hardware market. Adjustments in portfolios based on anticipated shifts in market share and profitability could lead to opportunities for those who correctly anticipate outcomes. The negotiation dynamic might introduce volatility, but it also highlights the strategic importance of cost-effective solutions in the AI infrastructure space. Lastly, the leaked information about Meta potentially working with Google's TPU in 2027 is likely a strategic move to negotiate with AMD, leveraging the competitive landscape to optimize its AI infrastructure investment. Meta, as the primary negotiator, stands to gain the most by securing better terms from AMD, reducing costs, and enhancing its financial flexibility. AMD, while initially at risk, could benefit from retaining a key customer and solidifying its market position. Google faces limited immediate benefits but may need to adapt its strategy to remain competitive. This scenario underscores the complex interplay of technology, market dynamics, and strategic maneuvering in the AI hardware market, where cost-effectiveness and scalability are paramount. As the data center infrastructure market continues to grow, the outcomes of such negotiations will shape the future of AI development and deployment.

Mike

182,048 views • 7 months ago

🚨JPMORGAN’S STEVE TUSA JUST DROPPED HIS 2026 OUTLOOK, IT’S BULLISH FOR DATA CENTERS🔥 Steve Tusa from JPMorgan has released his 2026 market predictions, with data centers sitting at the center of his outlook. Within the industrials space, he describes data centers as the primary driver, arguing that much of the group’s performance ultimately ties back to the AI and data center buildout. While he acknowledges some recent concern around the sustainability and length of the cycle, his on-the-ground read differs from the narrative that has taken hold in parts of the market. Demand tied to data centers has continued to accelerate through recent months, and he is clear that being materially underexposed to AI data centers is a mistake. In his view, pullbacks should be approached as opportunities rather than warnings. He directly addresses the overbuild debate, which remains a key source of skepticism. According to Tusa, there is no pause in real-world data center construction activity. Order activity has improved in recent weeks and is running stronger than it was around the end of the third quarter. Feedback from hyperscalers suggests supply is still struggling to catch up with demand, reinforcing his belief that the industry remains early in a multi-year buildout rather than late in the cycle. His comment about not seeing any “dark GPUs” sitting idle captures how tight the market still is. From a portfolio perspective, Tusa continues to favor staying with the AI data center buildout trade into 2026. Several data center-exposed industrial names have pulled back, but he views those moves as valuation resets driven by sentiment rather than a deterioration in underlying demand. That reset has created a more attractive entry point than what investors were facing just a few months ago. His preferred setup is a barbell approach. On one side are growth-oriented names with direct exposure to AI infrastructure demand. On the other are idiosyncratic margin expansion stories with some data center leverage, such as Johnson Controls, where he sees earnings growing in the mid-teens to around twenty percent over the next few years at reasonable valuations. Beyond that, he also points to select industrial names with cheaper economic leverage, but the primary focus remains on data center-driven growth and margin expansion. The broader takeaway is that despite skepticism and overbuild chatter, real-world demand, orders, and construction tied to data centers continue to strengthen. From JPMorgan’s perspective, this cycle still has meaningful runway left and is unlikely to be nearing its end anytime soon. $NBIS $IREN $NVDA $ORCL $AMD $GOOGL

Jordan

56,476 views • 6 months ago