Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Stratton Gets Emotional Jay Stratton talks about seeing beings. Hannity doesn't ask about the alleged Gray NHI Jay says he saw watching his son sleep, or the Predator-like (cloaked) being at Skinwalker. Did SH read the book? Then, Jay starts to get emotional about his family becoming closer bc... show more
13,354 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
15 Kommentare
Feel like it'd be a cold day in hell before I defend Hannity (well, not so-much defend,lol ) but reading ur tweet first, I prepared myself to get pissed when I pressed play.... I guess I can at least say it wasn't as bad as I expected from how ya worded it... I imagined a teary stratton & Hannity blowing him off with some pathetic "be a man!" Side eye, lol. Guess that shows what I wouldn't be surprised to see from Hannity, lol. So AT LEAST I can say... wasn't as bad as I pictured when I went to press play. Seemed at least semi-organic. And it is cool that it brought his family closer.... the cloud had a silver lining.🙏. Think if there's a reason why sole casuals may not know how to take that is becuz they haven't had any proper introduction to how this stuff can work. The idea of hitchhikers etc. To them, it probably doesn't compute, "how does the govt guy who studied ET PHONE HOME bring it home??, it followed him how? In the spaceship?? The spaceship straight up came to his house?? Is it like there like ALF?? I DONT GET IT." - kinda thing. (Obvs slight exaggeration for point lol, but they may think SOMETHIN like that cuz idk that mainstream understands or grasps the idea of hitchhikers or any of that yet.. It's nice to see Jay open up regardless, he's sharing personal things, & talkin about bringing his fam closer makes me think he should be on THE VIEW, Whoopi said she was a believer after 60min & that's the kind of supportive environment for that particular anecdote. Probably sell his book to lot of soccer moms too! 😁
@jaystratton "I imagined a teary stratton & Hannity blowing him off" I never said anything like that. But, I know, it's Hannity so you may have expected it. Yeah, they should have explained how things seems to "follow" you home and sooooo many people say the same thing happened to them.
@jaystratton Yeah Im wondering what impression that gives to the uninitiated... when they don't have a frame of reference for it. I'll at least have 2 anecdotal samples when I get back from voting then...
@jaystratton Maybe it means they should have followed up, “There were, you know, internet claims that there were Russian and Chinese agents moving around in the area. We didn't follow that up.”
@jaystratton Can you imagine going back decade by decade by decade concerning families having NHI intrusion/interactions.You don’t need a skinwalker ranch for any of it,unless of course you tend to enjoy a contrived playground. Somethings are important 2keep in mind.NHI are insanely deceitful
@jaystratton Stratton claims after bluebook closed (1969), no government officials/scientists was on the ufo case until him. Knowing bluebook was a whitewash I call BS. Maybe they didn't tell him.
@jaystratton Stratton claims ufos look blurry on photos because of their warp bubble. Heat does that.😐 Ask ai: Yes, hot aerial objects frequently look fuzzy, blobby, or out-of-focus on camera. Jet engine, drone, or rocket. Same w standard camera or a military-grade thermal infrared sensor.
Let's acknowledge some major steps are being taken recently by Hannity and guests like Stratton and Borland to dive deeper into the reality behind disclosure. This is not happenstance. It's an organized disclosure initiative from the highest levels of govt and yes, there are guardrails in place to avoid moving too fast. A horrific violation of human dignity took place for 70 years by certain Grays with the consent of the Deep State. Generations of families have been forced thru violent abductions (and worse) that remain for many as unconscious trauma. The abduction nightmare is now over and disclosure, when it comes, will be highly positive. But there's still a process of recognition and healing that needs to take place, and it will take some time..
How many of these are you going to watch in dismay? He is not sitting down with anyone with real questions. These guys used a statement about seeing things “with his own eyes” to sell a documentary, and now a book. You want it to be a craft in a facility. It was not. I think you’ll feel better if you skip the next few. I certainly will.
@jaystratton Totally agree with you, Joe. Especially an interview like this where basic humanity goes a long way toward credibility.
@jaystratton why did hannity choose to profile farah way more than stratton is one of the universe's biggest mysteries
@jaystratton That's the moment I'd have slowed down too. A guy getting choked up about his family tells you more than a headline number does.
@jaystratton Hannity, brother. He's a professional liar, not a deep thinker. Just a big, dumb, greedy asshat. I still think its a mistake for the UFO community to throw in with MAGA. I understand that it's for everyone, but this isn't progress. It just makes it ridiculous. UFOanon.
@jaystratton Check out who created the predator suit for the original movie...
@jaystratton They do talk about it in the interview
!["Avi was just, frankly, kind of dismissive of my colleague Jay Stratton." ~MH Yesterday, Professor Avi Loeb said: "I invited [Jay Stratton] to speak with the UAP Science Advisory Council. Jay did not respond to my invitation. Why is it a higher priority for Jay to speak with Fox News than with the UAP Science Advisory Council council?" And I said, "Fair question." Then I listened to this from Micah Hanks this morning, and I think we may have found one reason why Stratton didn't respond to Avi. "Anybody out there who's ever met [Jay Stratton], you probably will know that he's a really great guy." (Count me in on that. ⬆️ This is not a good look for Avi. ⬇️) Micah: "I had given my talk earlier that day. Jay Stratton was giving his talk, I think, the following day, and then we had the Disclosure panel on Friday. And so we had to go prepare for the Disclosure panel. "While we were in preparation for the panel on Friday, Jay got a phone call, and somebody said, 'Yeah, Avi was over here at your table, and he was looking for you.' And so we thought, oh well, you know, Dr. Loeb wants to meet Jay Stratton, that's wonderful. "So after we finish our prep, we head back over to the event center. We go in there. Unfortunately, Dr. Loeb had finished his talk, we didn't get to see that because we had other obligations. So we decided we'd try to go find Avi, and we went over to Jay's table. And they said, 'Oh, [Avi's] backstage right now, so you can probably still catch him.' "And so, Jay and I head back there. I'm eager to introduce Jay to Avi. And sure enough, Avi's in the green room. So I say, 'Doctor Loeb, my friend Jay Stratton, I want to introduce you to.' And Avi looks at both of us, and the first thing he says, 'Did you listen to my lecture?' "So I respond, 'Well, Dr. Loeb, unfortunately, we are here as speakers, and we are having to do work, and so regretfully we had other obligations because we have to do a Disclosure panel tomorrow, and we were preparing for that. So I apologize; we weren't able to see your talk.' "Well, Avi, not really looking at us, he's kind of looking past us, kind of looking down at the ground. But he says, 'Well, if you're preparing a disclosure panel, you should be listening to the man who is working with the government on Disclosure right now. I'm literally going to Washington right now to go to talk to the people at the ODNI about Disclosure.' "Well, yet again, as before, I am somehow detecting some irritation from Avi Loeb, and so I apologize. I say, 'Listen, I really do apologize. We weren't able to be here, but again, we just have other obligations. We have a bunch of things that we're responsible for this weekend.' "And I will point out - and keep in mind, I'm paraphrasing here - but I mean, I said to Avi, 'Jay, of course, was the former director of the UAP Task Force, so I mean, he spent a good bit of time in government working on Disclosure as well.' "And [Avi's] looking off past us, not making eye contact. But he sort of repeats, 'Well, if you want to know about Disclosure, you should have watched my lecture, because I am the man who is leading that effort. I am not merely talking about Disclosure, I am going to Washington and working on it.' "Well, at this point, I got a little irritated myself. I have known Dr. Loeb for many years, we've always been very cordial to one another. And I never would have guessed in a million years that when I took my colleague, Jay Stratton, backstage to meet Dr. Loeb, he would stand there and insist that he and only he is leading the UFO disclosure effort. Despite the fact that, to my knowledge, he doesn't have a security clearance, even though he is heading up a very important advisory council on UAP to members of the Intelligence Community, and I applaud him for that. "So I said to Dr. Loeb, 'Well, congratulations. I'm so glad that you and only you are able to achieve this, and that you are making such strides.' But then again, trying to lower the temperature, I said, 'You know, how's your family, Avi? I mean, I hope everybody's well.' And again, he just kind of says, 'Well, they're fine, but you should have listened to my lecture. I'm going to Washington right now.' "So Avi leaves, he has a plane he's gotta catch, and I'm left with this, sort of, bad taste in my mouth. I mean, personally, I felt like, maybe not only this was a little awkward, but maybe there could have been a slightly more positive exchange in the first meeting between Avi and Jay Stratton. "And I felt like, you know, Avi was just, frankly, kind of dismissive of my colleague Jay Stratton and I. But especially, that was the case regarding Jay. And I have a lot of respect for Jay, and that's why I took issue with this. Anybody out there who's ever met him, you probably will know that he's a really great guy on all fronts. "In fact, he surprises me sometimes. What a great guy, what a great American he is. So that means a lot to me, and I want [Jay] to be shown respect. And I didn't feel like that was really happening in this instance. That was just my take. "Anyway, we all get home, it was a wonderful event, and sure enough, I have an email waiting from Avi. And I thought, well, maybe he's, you know, got some sentiments to share or something, or maybe he wants to kind of smooth things over. And I open the email, and it is a link to his new article on Medium about the event that we were at in Vernal. "And there's one line in the body of the email above the link. It says, 'Everyone who was there said that my talk was the best one at the entire event,' or something to that effect. Again, I'm paraphrasing. But I'm thinking to myself, reading the email: Ok, Dr. Loeb, I get it. Point taken. Yours was the best talk of the entire event. I'm really sorry I missed it. "The article in question, dated September 12th, 2026, is titled 'Make History Better Rather Than Talk About It.' I'll skip ahead to the relevant portion because he talks a good bit about his talk there at PhenomeCon and various other things. "Then he goes on to mention, 'For many years, I was jealous of accomplished bakers, who often have a long line of customers waiting for their creations. Through 40 years of publishing more than 1000 scientific papers, I never witnessed people waiting in line for my fresh, out-of-the-oven research insights. All of this, until two days ago, when dozens of conference attendees lined up to express gratitude about my work and take a photo with me. "'After my keynote speech,' Avi tells us, 'I met Jay Stratton, who apologized for not being able to attend my talk as he was preparing his presentation about UAP Disclosure. By the time he gave his presentation, I was on my red-eye flight to D.C. thinking how much more fulfilling it is to be part of making history than talking about it.' "Now, of course, you can see why I take issue with this, and in fairness, I think he's really just kind of paraphrasing. But in this version of the account on the Medium page there, I'm written out of the narrative. Which is problematic to me because it was actually me who had apologized, and Jay and I were talking about the Disclosure panel. "Some of the facts are inherently wrong. But I see that, of course, wording it the way that he does, Dr. Loeb is, I think, able to frame this in terms of having this one-on-one interaction with Jay, and being able to come away from that meeting saying, 'Well, Jay goes and gives a talk about disclosure. I immediately left and went to Washington to get to work on it.' "Well, Doctor Loeb, respectfully, and that's always what I mean because I genuinely do mean it. And Avi and I have always had great interactions in the past. But in this instance, Dr. Loeb, I respectfully take issue with your tone and your attitude. The way this was conveyed in the Medium post isn't exactly how it really happened. "And you don't have to mention me, I know that's not important to you, but the very thing you're saying about being ignored by the bakers, you know, with his little analogy there? Well, not only are you doing that to me, but you're also trying to make light of the most senior official who ever investigated UAP for the United States government, the many years that he spent doing that, the security clearances he held while he was conducting those investigations, and the right I feel that he has earned as an American to get up there on that podium and to talk about whatever he wants to. His talk was excellent." "I went and I asked people, I said, 'You know, listen, I'm so sorry we missed Avi's talk. What did he talk about?' The first thing someone told me was they said he spent the first 15 minutes showing pictures of himself with celebrities.'" (I'll link to the audio in the replies and give you a timestamp if you wanna listen to the entire thing.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2110414165945045127/amplify_video_thumb/2110379576761397248/img/WJJ1ep6cqfD6otuQ.jpg)
![UAP Gerb (paraphrasing): "Someone should ask Jay Stratton why David Grusch had to discuss [Stephanie] O'Sullivan before Jay Stratton did." And the devil is in the details 👀](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2036517324803678657/amplify_video_thumb/2036516713509036035/img/3Z88zqrK9xk2zsKO.jpg)
