Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

77,359 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Top 10 hot and steamy Netflix original series 🔥
8:50

Sensitive content

Top 10 hot and steamy Netflix original series 🔥

Every Movie Plug

2,510,248 views • 2 years ago

With Tulsi Gabbard's new revelations about US bio labs in many countries around the world including Ukraine, it's fascinating recall the bizarre series of events that gave rise to this controversy in the first place: In May of 2022, some of us began asking whether the US had bio labs in Ukraine, what they were for, and why the US had them there. For asking those questions, we were instantly branded as "pro-Russian conspiracy theorists" in official Ukrainian intel reports, on our Wikipedia pages, by countless media outlets, etc. This was and remains one of the most bizarre episodes I've ever seen. Before May 2022, when we asked those questions, barely anyone had ever thought about let alone asked about "bio weapons in Ukraine"! I certainly hadn't. Like most people, I had never mentioned a word about it because it had never occurred to me we had them there. But then, Marco Rubio summoned Victoria Nuland to the Senate and asked her in a televised hearing under oath about these "rumors," clearly expecting her to immediately debunk them as obvious Kremlin lies and to proclaim the US had no such bio labs in Ukraine. Instead, Nuland did the opposite! She *confirmed* key aspects of these "rumors," and she explicitly warned that the US has several "bio research labs" in Ukraine that are so dangerous that they must not be allowed to fall into Russia's hands. When some of us heard Nuland's rather shocking admission -- the first-ever disclosure about these labs -- we of course asked: wait! what? Why does the US have bio labs in Ukraine, and what are the US and Ukraine doing in those labs that make them (in Nuland's eyes) so dangerous?? (Note: nobody ever suggested that the presence of these bio labs in Ukraine justified the Russian invasion; we just wanted answers about these US bio labs that Nuland had casually divulged). We never got real answers. We got smear campaigns. To this day, our names are formally attached to claims that we spread "conspiracy theories" for asking about these labs even though it was Victoria Nuland herself who was the one who accidentally revealed them for the first time in a Senate hearing in response to a shocked Marco Rubio. They then quickly tried shutting down any questioning by pretending that Nuland never said this, and it was just a bunch of paid Kremlin mouthpieces who were spreading lies. You see the same tactics now being against Tulsi for releasing this new intelligence report. Watch the Nuland testimony in question:

Glenn Greenwald

558,975 views • 2 days ago

When you realise India cancelled lakhs crore worth of projects in the name of environment and China won every single contract that followed, the entire story looks very different. This is not about environmentalism. This is about who benefited every single time India said no. Between 2009 and 2014 China was aggressively expanding its industrial capacity at a scale the world had never seen. Steel. Mining. Infrastructure. Manufacturing. While Beijing was building at full speed, something very different was happening inside India. Every major project that got announced faced the same pattern. NGO protests arrive almost immediately. Environment Ministry officials respond with remarkable speed. Project halted. Investors stuck. Years pass. Companies give up and leave. POSCO from South Korea was bringing the largest foreign direct investment project in India's history. Fifty two thousand crore. Steel manufacturing. Jobs. Industrial capacity. In 2010 it was halted. Then delayed again. Then delayed again. POSCO eventually walked away after years of waiting. It was not alone. Vedanta. ArcelorMittal. Mega projects across mining and steel that would have built India's industrial backbone were buried under layers of bureaucratic obstruction so thick that the companies simply exhausted themselves and left. Science research facilities got halted. Hydroelectric projects that would have powered India's growth for decades got stopped in the name of environmental protection. Now look at what happened in the international market every time India's mining or steel project got cancelled. The demand those projects would have met did not disappear. The world still needed the steel. Still needed the minerals. Still needed the industrial output. And every single time India stepped back from that supply, China stepped forward to fill it. Normal environment clearance processes on paper. The systematic strangulation of India's industrial growth underneath. The question worth asking is the same one nobody in that era was asking loudly enough. Was this genuinely about protecting India's environment? Or was someone else's economy the real beneficiary of every project India cancelled? The timing is too consistent. The pattern is too clean. And the winner is always the same.

Karan Datta 🇮🇳

30,487 views • 21 hours ago