Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Streak lost

PicturesFoIder's profile picture

non aesthetic things

5,712,983 subscribers

568,640 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ИскусствоНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Sewing streak wont be lost
0:13

Sewing streak wont be lost

CrocodilePie

33,548 просмотров • 1 год назад

FSD v14.3.3 ignores “No turn on 🔴.” Lost my streak 😢
0:14

FSD v14.3.3 ignores “No turn on 🔴.” Lost my streak 😢

Lior

24,568 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

mingyu when he lost after having a 3-win streak... so unserious 😭
0:18

mingyu when he lost after having a 3-win streak... so unserious 😭

🐶

59,020 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Lost my beloved 42 mile streak because Cybertruck doesn’t know its corners in a tight spot
0:13

Lost my beloved 42 mile streak because Cybertruck doesn’t know its corners in a tight spot

The Cybertruck Guy

21,423 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

You came home after work and you remembered that ICT lost the winning streak yesterday.. 😖 #T20WorldCup #INDvsSA
0:13

You came home after work and you remembered that ICT lost the winning streak yesterday.. 😖 #T20WorldCup #INDvsSA

Rajabets 🇮🇳👑

14,710 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Medicine Hat Tigers won the WHL last year, lost Gavin Mckenna and are now on an 18 game win streak
0:14

The Medicine Hat Tigers won the WHL last year, lost Gavin Mckenna and are now on an 18 game win streak

World Hockey Report

235,833 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

EVERTON FANS SINGING: "THEY LOST THE LEAGUE AT GOODISON PARK." 🎶 FIRST MERSEYSIDE DERBY WIN AT HOME SINCE 2010. WHAT A TIME TO BREAK THE STREAK. 🔵
0:11

EVERTON FANS SINGING: "THEY LOST THE LEAGUE AT GOODISON PARK." 🎶 FIRST MERSEYSIDE DERBY WIN AT HOME SINCE 2010. WHAT A TIME TO BREAK THE STREAK. 🔵

Men in Blazers

291,491 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Lost my FSD 14.3.3 Streak today 🫠 My Cybertruck wanted to park on top of the shopping cart 🛒 return. I had to hit the brakes 😬
0:17

Lost my FSD 14.3.3 Streak today 🫠 My Cybertruck wanted to park on top of the shopping cart 🛒 return. I had to hit the brakes 😬

TimDOES

97,470 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ENDING A 15-MONTH STREAK! 🚫🏟️ "I learned that they haven't lost here for more than a year... so it is an incredible victory." — Micah Christenson 🇺🇸 Trento hadn't lost a match on their home court since October 17, 2024.
0:16

ENDING A 15-MONTH STREAK! 🚫🏟️ "I learned that they haven't lost here for more than a year... so it is an incredible victory." — Micah Christenson 🇺🇸 Trento hadn't lost a match on their home court since October 17, 2024.

Micah Christenson Gallery

33,127 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

2020 LEBRON LUKA MVP AGENDAS STILL IN PLAY REAVES STILL ON A HEATER DOMINAYTON 3 GAME WINNING STREAK 11-4 WARRIUHS LOST THE CHIP IS OURS THIS IS THE YEAR
0:19

2020 LEBRON LUKA MVP AGENDAS STILL IN PLAY REAVES STILL ON A HEATER DOMINAYTON 3 GAME WINNING STREAK 11-4 WARRIUHS LOST THE CHIP IS OURS THIS IS THE YEAR

𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗙𝗨𝗟 𝗟𝗔 𝗙𝗔𝗡 🕷️

11,129 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🏆❌ When Dricus Du Plessis lost his KSW Welterweight title via KO to Roberto Soldic. This was the last loss in DDP's career. He went on 11-fight win streak since then. 🎥 KSW
0:11

🏆❌ When Dricus Du Plessis lost his KSW Welterweight title via KO to Roberto Soldic. This was the last loss in DDP's career. He went on 11-fight win streak since then. 🎥 KSW

Home Of Fight Picks

372,583 просмотров • 1 год назад

MSU has lost 13-straight SEC games dating back to last season. That ties for the longest losing streak in school history set in 1975. Asked Chris Lemonis why the Bulldogs have struggled to win in the SEC two years after the national title.
0:19

MSU has lost 13-straight SEC games dating back to last season. That ties for the longest losing streak in school history set in 1975. Asked Chris Lemonis why the Bulldogs have struggled to win in the SEC two years after the national title.

Robbie Faulk

141,289 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Tonight I lost my 792.1 mile Self-Driving streak because I got excited when I saw the Model Y next to me summoning out of its spot, and slammed on the brake to watch. Oh well. It does look crazier when it's not your car / you're not expecting it.
0:14

Tonight I lost my 792.1 mile Self-Driving streak because I got excited when I saw the Model Y next to me summoning out of its spot, and slammed on the brake to watch. Oh well. It does look crazier when it's not your car / you're not expecting it.

Owen Sparks

179,408 просмотров • 12 дней назад

I didn’t have high expectations for this season, but I NEVER thought it would be this bad. Memphis just lost to Tulane (previously on a 5-game losing streak) at home. They are now 10-11. 5-4 in AAC play. Not to mention, the attendance is so bad that they’re moving everybody down to the lower bowl + giving out free tickets in the lower bowl to season ticket holders. There needs to be change this offseason.
0:15

I didn’t have high expectations for this season, but I NEVER thought it would be this bad. Memphis just lost to Tulane (previously on a 5-game losing streak) at home. They are now 10-11. 5-4 in AAC play. Not to mention, the attendance is so bad that they’re moving everybody down to the lower bowl + giving out free tickets in the lower bowl to season ticket holders. There needs to be change this offseason.

Hitmen Hoops

74,448 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I lost my streak on day 11😅 Took Ant Over 25.5 Pts LIVE at the end of the third, as he had 25 so needed one more point in the entire 4th quarter in a 12 point game. He was 30.5 on other books. An AMAZING play. He didn’t get a single point the rest of the game. Wolves bench went on a run vs Spurs starters, spurs yanked early, and Finch told Ant not to go in. Starting over tommorow on HERE❤️⬇️
0:11

I lost my streak on day 11😅 Took Ant Over 25.5 Pts LIVE at the end of the third, as he had 25 so needed one more point in the entire 4th quarter in a 12 point game. He was 30.5 on other books. An AMAZING play. He didn’t get a single point the rest of the game. Wolves bench went on a run vs Spurs starters, spurs yanked early, and Finch told Ant not to go in. Starting over tommorow on HERE❤️⬇️

Prop Geek Zeke

246,258 просмотров • 1 год назад

1/7 Built a Polymarket trading bot over 3 months. Here are the biggest mistakes that cost me real money > Went from v1 to v61. Every version fixed something painful. --- 2/7 Stop Loss killed more money than it saved. > Binary markets need room to breathe - fluctuations are normal. > Stop Loss was cutting positions on random noise and locking in losses right before the market flipped. > Removed it in v61. Immediately better. --- 3/7 Martingale + Stop Loss = a loss cascade. > Seemed logical: lost $5 -> bet $8, lost again -> bet $10. > In practice: a losing streak plus early exits = a hole in your balance in a single day. > Killed it. For good. --- 4/7 Smart Exit without Force Exit is a trap. > Token hits 90c (+75% profit), but the bot was waiting for a "BTC reversal" signal. > Market closes, token drops, profit gone. > Fix: hard Force Exit at 85c. No conditions, no waiting. --- 5/7 Blocking the 5:30-10:30 PM ET window felt safe. It wasn't. > NYSE open = sharp spikes = bad signals. Made sense to block it. > But the full block was also killing clean entries at 8-10:30 PM. > Had to split the zone into segments with different edge/move thresholds. --- 6/7 The Gamma API lies about market start time. > Start price ("price to beat") is the core input for every signal. > Gamma was returning stale data. Had to pull prices directly from Chainlink on-chain on Polygon. > That's its own adventure - polling a smart contract every 2 seconds at 2 AM. --- 7/7 The real lesson: don't overcomplicate what works. > v1: complex system, 10 indicators -> -$200/day > v61: "buy the expensive token for $5, exit at +30%" -> consistently green > Simpler logic = fewer failure points. > The bot runs 96 intervals a day. Every mistake shows up fast.
0:16

1/7 Built a Polymarket trading bot over 3 months. Here are the biggest mistakes that cost me real money > Went from v1 to v61. Every version fixed something painful. --- 2/7 Stop Loss killed more money than it saved. > Binary markets need room to breathe - fluctuations are normal. > Stop Loss was cutting positions on random noise and locking in losses right before the market flipped. > Removed it in v61. Immediately better. --- 3/7 Martingale + Stop Loss = a loss cascade. > Seemed logical: lost $5 -> bet $8, lost again -> bet $10. > In practice: a losing streak plus early exits = a hole in your balance in a single day. > Killed it. For good. --- 4/7 Smart Exit without Force Exit is a trap. > Token hits 90c (+75% profit), but the bot was waiting for a "BTC reversal" signal. > Market closes, token drops, profit gone. > Fix: hard Force Exit at 85c. No conditions, no waiting. --- 5/7 Blocking the 5:30-10:30 PM ET window felt safe. It wasn't. > NYSE open = sharp spikes = bad signals. Made sense to block it. > But the full block was also killing clean entries at 8-10:30 PM. > Had to split the zone into segments with different edge/move thresholds. --- 6/7 The Gamma API lies about market start time. > Start price ("price to beat") is the core input for every signal. > Gamma was returning stale data. Had to pull prices directly from Chainlink on-chain on Polygon. > That's its own adventure - polling a smart contract every 2 seconds at 2 AM. --- 7/7 The real lesson: don't overcomplicate what works. > v1: complex system, 10 indicators -> -$200/day > v61: "buy the expensive token for $5, exit at +30%" -> consistently green > Simpler logic = fewer failure points. > The bot runs 96 intervals a day. Every mistake shows up fast.

Kotte

31,753 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A Jane Street quant sat down across from me at Dandelion I was grinding through a loss streak. Three red windows in a row. BTC 5-min bot on screen. She clocked it from the next table. "Is that Polymarket? Why is your oracle pinned" I told her. Chainlink. Resolves every 5 minutes. Binance and Coinbase are the real price. She moved her matcha over without asking. "You're trading oracle lag. We did this on ETH perps in 2022. Regulators shut us down in six weeks" Not perps. Binary markets. Nobody regulates a 5-minute window. 86 million Polymarket trades. Every fill. Every book snapshot. Every resolution. "You wrote a scorer on top of this" I didn't. Claude did. One prompt. 21 days of tick data. I asked what setup has the highest follow-through. Binance and Coinbase both cross the target by $50. Same direction. Chainlink hasn't printed yet. 94% of the time the oracle catches up inside 2 minutes. "So you're front-running a feed that can't front-run you back" Yeah. She pulled out a notebook. Actual paper. Wrote something. Circled it twice. "At the desk we called this a stale quote trade. Died the minute oracles went sub-second" I told her Chainlink on Polymarket still runs on a 5-minute update. That's the whole game. A green fill landed. +$52. "What's the second layer" Order book imbalance. First 10 levels. First 90 seconds. Above 1.8 buyers are loading. Below 0.55 sellers are breaking it. Retail doesn't show up until t+240. Three files. Entry scorer. Exit trigger. Settlement router. Claude rebuilds the scorer every Sunday from the week's logs. "You're letting it rewrite its own strategy" Exactly. "That's the part my old risk team would have lost sleep over" The exit is what keeps it alive. 0.75 shares. Never resolution. Polygon settles in 1 to 3 seconds and half the fills miss in the last minute. Early exit locks 70% of max. Redeploy next window. "55 out of 400 a day" How did you know. "Kelly fraction on a 71% hit rate with that payoff geometry. You'd be insane to trade more" She wasn't wrong. My setup: Claude API - $20/mo Hetzner VPS - $5/mo poly_data - free polymarket-trade-engine - free Polymarket/agents - free 30 days. 1,847 trades. 71% win rate. +$14,200. Copytrade here: Sharpe 2.84. Max DD -$640. Avg hold 3:12. She closed her notebook. "I make more than this in a bad afternoon at the desk. But the desk doesn't let me copy-paste a scorer from Claude on a Sunday" I told her that's the whole point. She stared at the screen for a minute. "Can I follow this wallet" Already live. The article was up the next morning. Her partner DMed me by lunch. Three lines. "Saw your post. My entire prop group is reading it. We'd like to talk" I told him the post is the talk. Everything's in it. Nothing left to gatekeep.
0:19

A Jane Street quant sat down across from me at Dandelion I was grinding through a loss streak. Three red windows in a row. BTC 5-min bot on screen. She clocked it from the next table. "Is that Polymarket? Why is your oracle pinned" I told her. Chainlink. Resolves every 5 minutes. Binance and Coinbase are the real price. She moved her matcha over without asking. "You're trading oracle lag. We did this on ETH perps in 2022. Regulators shut us down in six weeks" Not perps. Binary markets. Nobody regulates a 5-minute window. 86 million Polymarket trades. Every fill. Every book snapshot. Every resolution. "You wrote a scorer on top of this" I didn't. Claude did. One prompt. 21 days of tick data. I asked what setup has the highest follow-through. Binance and Coinbase both cross the target by $50. Same direction. Chainlink hasn't printed yet. 94% of the time the oracle catches up inside 2 minutes. "So you're front-running a feed that can't front-run you back" Yeah. She pulled out a notebook. Actual paper. Wrote something. Circled it twice. "At the desk we called this a stale quote trade. Died the minute oracles went sub-second" I told her Chainlink on Polymarket still runs on a 5-minute update. That's the whole game. A green fill landed. +$52. "What's the second layer" Order book imbalance. First 10 levels. First 90 seconds. Above 1.8 buyers are loading. Below 0.55 sellers are breaking it. Retail doesn't show up until t+240. Three files. Entry scorer. Exit trigger. Settlement router. Claude rebuilds the scorer every Sunday from the week's logs. "You're letting it rewrite its own strategy" Exactly. "That's the part my old risk team would have lost sleep over" The exit is what keeps it alive. 0.75 shares. Never resolution. Polygon settles in 1 to 3 seconds and half the fills miss in the last minute. Early exit locks 70% of max. Redeploy next window. "55 out of 400 a day" How did you know. "Kelly fraction on a 71% hit rate with that payoff geometry. You'd be insane to trade more" She wasn't wrong. My setup: Claude API - $20/mo Hetzner VPS - $5/mo poly_data - free polymarket-trade-engine - free Polymarket/agents - free 30 days. 1,847 trades. 71% win rate. +$14,200. Copytrade here: Sharpe 2.84. Max DD -$640. Avg hold 3:12. She closed her notebook. "I make more than this in a bad afternoon at the desk. But the desk doesn't let me copy-paste a scorer from Claude on a Sunday" I told her that's the whole point. She stared at the screen for a minute. "Can I follow this wallet" Already live. The article was up the next morning. Her partner DMed me by lunch. Three lines. "Saw your post. My entire prop group is reading it. We'd like to talk" I told him the post is the talk. Everything's in it. Nothing left to gatekeep.

Lunar

20,307 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The biggest Bitcoin miners on earth are quietly walking away from mining Bitcoin, and the reason is not the one everyone keeps repeating. They are not fleeing a dead business. They lost an auction for their own power, and the winner was artificial intelligence. Start with the brutal arithmetic. It now costs the average public miner around $80,000 in cash to produce a single Bitcoin, and for stretches of this year $BTC traded below that. The most efficient operators on the cheapest power still clear a margin, but an estimated 15 to 20 percent of the global fleet is mining at a loss right now, burning more in power than the coins are worth the second they are minted. Three straight downward difficulty adjustments earlier this year, the first such streak since 2022, were the footprint of machines going dark. That looks like a simple story of a broken business until you see the number that explains the exodus. The same megawatt of power that earns a Bitcoin miner roughly $1 million a year earns between $10 and $20 million a year hosting AI compute. Ten to twenty times more, for the identical electricity, substation, and cooling. What made industrial miners valuable was never the mining. It was the power contracts, the land, the grid interconnects. AI walked in and bid an order of magnitude higher for exactly those assets. Mining did not fail. It got outbid for its own infrastructure. When Core Scientific runs its BTC segment at a negative margin while its AI colocation business prints money, the decision writes itself. CoinShares estimates listed miners could pull up to 70 percent of their revenue from AI by year end, up from about 30 percent. The power is being repriced to its highest use, and Bitcoin lost the bidding. If the giants leave, what happens to the network they secured? The doom posts assume it weakens. It does not, because Bitcoin has a self-healing reflex written into its core. When miners switch off, blocks slow, and within two weeks difficulty automatically drops, which makes mining cheaper and more profitable for everyone still running. The security does not vanish, it relocates, and you can already see where. State-backed pools are appearing, with one Gulf operator reportedly standing up a national pool near 3 percent of global hashrate, alongside private fleets and the handful of public miners like Marathon still choosing to buy Bitcoin rather than lease their power away. The network even hit an all-time high above one zettahash this year as the pivot accelerated. It does not need any particular miner. It needs someone, somewhere, for whom the math still works, and cheap stranded power has no shortage of those. But there is a deeper timer here, and the AI pivot just exposed it. Today miners earn almost everything from the block subsidy and almost nothing from fees, often under one percent of revenue on a quiet day. That subsidy halves again in 2028, and every four years after, marching toward zero. For Bitcoin to pay for its own security forever, fees eventually have to replace it. The open question is whether they can, and the evidence cuts both ways. On busy days, during token launches and inscription waves, fees have already spiked past 15 percent of revenue, and in 2024 some blocks earned more in fees than the entire subsidy. The capacity is there in bursts. Whether bursts become a baseline is the single most important unanswered question in Bitcoin. The AI exodus did not create that question. It pulled the cover off it years early, and showed how fast capital abandons hashing the moment something pays more. So the honest read is not that AI kills Bitcoin mining. It is stranger than that. AI is the first bidder rich enough to reveal what Bitcoin's security was always quietly worth, and what it will cost to keep once the free coins stop coming. The miners are not abandoning a sinking ship. They are selling the deck to a higher bidder while the same clock everyone forgot about keeps ticking underneath.
0:10

The biggest Bitcoin miners on earth are quietly walking away from mining Bitcoin, and the reason is not the one everyone keeps repeating. They are not fleeing a dead business. They lost an auction for their own power, and the winner was artificial intelligence. Start with the brutal arithmetic. It now costs the average public miner around $80,000 in cash to produce a single Bitcoin, and for stretches of this year $BTC traded below that. The most efficient operators on the cheapest power still clear a margin, but an estimated 15 to 20 percent of the global fleet is mining at a loss right now, burning more in power than the coins are worth the second they are minted. Three straight downward difficulty adjustments earlier this year, the first such streak since 2022, were the footprint of machines going dark. That looks like a simple story of a broken business until you see the number that explains the exodus. The same megawatt of power that earns a Bitcoin miner roughly $1 million a year earns between $10 and $20 million a year hosting AI compute. Ten to twenty times more, for the identical electricity, substation, and cooling. What made industrial miners valuable was never the mining. It was the power contracts, the land, the grid interconnects. AI walked in and bid an order of magnitude higher for exactly those assets. Mining did not fail. It got outbid for its own infrastructure. When Core Scientific runs its BTC segment at a negative margin while its AI colocation business prints money, the decision writes itself. CoinShares estimates listed miners could pull up to 70 percent of their revenue from AI by year end, up from about 30 percent. The power is being repriced to its highest use, and Bitcoin lost the bidding. If the giants leave, what happens to the network they secured? The doom posts assume it weakens. It does not, because Bitcoin has a self-healing reflex written into its core. When miners switch off, blocks slow, and within two weeks difficulty automatically drops, which makes mining cheaper and more profitable for everyone still running. The security does not vanish, it relocates, and you can already see where. State-backed pools are appearing, with one Gulf operator reportedly standing up a national pool near 3 percent of global hashrate, alongside private fleets and the handful of public miners like Marathon still choosing to buy Bitcoin rather than lease their power away. The network even hit an all-time high above one zettahash this year as the pivot accelerated. It does not need any particular miner. It needs someone, somewhere, for whom the math still works, and cheap stranded power has no shortage of those. But there is a deeper timer here, and the AI pivot just exposed it. Today miners earn almost everything from the block subsidy and almost nothing from fees, often under one percent of revenue on a quiet day. That subsidy halves again in 2028, and every four years after, marching toward zero. For Bitcoin to pay for its own security forever, fees eventually have to replace it. The open question is whether they can, and the evidence cuts both ways. On busy days, during token launches and inscription waves, fees have already spiked past 15 percent of revenue, and in 2024 some blocks earned more in fees than the entire subsidy. The capacity is there in bursts. Whether bursts become a baseline is the single most important unanswered question in Bitcoin. The AI exodus did not create that question. It pulled the cover off it years early, and showed how fast capital abandons hashing the moment something pays more. So the honest read is not that AI kills Bitcoin mining. It is stranger than that. AI is the first bidder rich enough to reveal what Bitcoin's security was always quietly worth, and what it will cost to keep once the free coins stop coming. The miners are not abandoning a sinking ship. They are selling the deck to a higher bidder while the same clock everyone forgot about keeps ticking underneath.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

90,586 просмотров • 1 месяц назад