Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Street Fighter 6 has a rage quitting problem that Capcom needs to address. If you win the match and someone disconnects before the win screen YOU get punished and they take points from YOU. It's not a small amount of points either you lose an equivalent of almost 2... show more

BreezyMan

1,489 subscribers

67,104 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BRUTAL way to lose a match! You make the call! Paddy gets the takedown at the end of regulation for the win. But then it's reviewed and they take it away. Then they go to overtime, he pressures your opponent to the edge and out of bounds, you get hit for stalling and lose the match. I can't say I agree with either call.

BRUTAL way to lose a match! You make the call! Paddy gets the takedown at the end of regulation for the win. But then it's reviewed and they take it away. Then they go to overtime, he pressures your opponent to the edge and out of bounds, you get hit for stalling and lose the match. I can't say I agree with either call.

Christian Pyles

48,439 views • 9 months ago

Alright its time we address this issue in Street Fighter 6. When a player rage quits or the system disconnects, they punish the winner by deducting points. This game has been out for three years and their system still can't detect which player to punish for a disconnect. I clearly won by the concluding K.O. screen but the system isn't robust enough to count that as a win. Principle matters here, this completely discourages players from trying to hit personal goals.

Alright its time we address this issue in Street Fighter 6. When a player rage quits or the system disconnects, they punish the winner by deducting points. This game has been out for three years and their system still can't detect which player to punish for a disconnect. I clearly won by the concluding K.O. screen but the system isn't robust enough to count that as a win. Principle matters here, this completely discourages players from trying to hit personal goals.

BreezyMan

38,336 views • 4 months ago

🚨 FC26 - Your Opponent disconnect before min 45 From what I understand from the Ultimate Team trailer, you don't get the win if your opponent disconnects early in the game. "Late in the game, after a red card, or before a penalty." "If the score is tight and your opponent disconnects in any of these situations (late in the game, after a red card, or before a penalty), not just by the menu but by any method, you will get the win."

🚨 FC26 - Your Opponent disconnect before min 45 From what I understand from the Ultimate Team trailer, you don't get the win if your opponent disconnects early in the game. "Late in the game, after a red card, or before a penalty." "If the score is tight and your opponent disconnects in any of these situations (late in the game, after a red card, or before a penalty), not just by the menu but by any method, you will get the win."

FUT POLICE LEAKS

127,708 views • 1 year ago

The British need to realise, and realise VERY quickly, that there is literally NOWHERE for them to go if they lose Britain. Don't think for a SECOND that the people you let into YOUR country will EVER do the same for you. It's either you WIN, and win comprehensively, with total or near total remigration of Third Worlders - or you LOSE, and you lose completely. There is NOTHING more important than getting the Third World parasites OUT.

The British need to realise, and realise VERY quickly, that there is literally NOWHERE for them to go if they lose Britain. Don't think for a SECOND that the people you let into YOUR country will EVER do the same for you. It's either you WIN, and win comprehensively, with total or near total remigration of Third Worlders - or you LOSE, and you lose completely. There is NOTHING more important than getting the Third World parasites OUT.

Holly Grayle

197,289 views • 1 month ago

Dearborn, Michigan Imam preaches that trying to kill Jews is a "win-win situation." "It is impossible to lose to a Zionist on the battlefield; either you kill him and he goes to hell, or he kills you and you go to paradise. It's a win-win situation."

Dearborn, Michigan Imam preaches that trying to kill Jews is a "win-win situation." "It is impossible to lose to a Zionist on the battlefield; either you kill him and he goes to hell, or he kills you and you go to paradise. It's a win-win situation."

Eyal Yakoby

267,011 views • 1 year ago

If I lose, they win. If they win, you lose. If you lose, Britain will forever be broken and nothing will change. We will prevail. My message to the people of Clacton. 👇

If I lose, they win. If they win, you lose. If you lose, Britain will forever be broken and nothing will change. We will prevail. My message to the people of Clacton. 👇

Nigel Farage

2,251,333 views • 1 month ago

🖇️ Cellbit teaching Agent how to make an airplane paper! #CELLBIT: If you win, it's kind of half a victory for me. #AGENT: I'm gonna give you my points, mostly likely, if I win.

🖇️ Cellbit teaching Agent how to make an airplane paper! #CELLBIT: If you win, it's kind of half a victory for me. #AGENT: I'm gonna give you my points, mostly likely, if I win.

Cellbit English Updates

248,469 views • 19 days ago

Richard Jefferson talking about how to prevent teams from tanking in the NBA “There was a thing in soccer. It’s like once you are eliminated from the playoffs, you should actually be given points towards your percentage for the games you win. Does that make sense? So, if you’re eliminated from the playoffs and there’s 10 games left, if you go 0 for 10, you should have a lower percentage of getting a higher pick. If you go 6 and 4 in your last 10, that means you are trying to win. The wins give you closer percentage to a higher pick. So those 6 wins instead of you having a 30% chance, right? If you go 0 for 10, if you can win 6 of your last 10 after you been eliminated, you actually have a 35% chance. So they reward you for pushing all the way to the end” (Via Road Trippin’ Show)

Richard Jefferson talking about how to prevent teams from tanking in the NBA “There was a thing in soccer. It’s like once you are eliminated from the playoffs, you should actually be given points towards your percentage for the games you win. Does that make sense? So, if you’re eliminated from the playoffs and there’s 10 games left, if you go 0 for 10, you should have a lower percentage of getting a higher pick. If you go 6 and 4 in your last 10, that means you are trying to win. The wins give you closer percentage to a higher pick. So those 6 wins instead of you having a 30% chance, right? If you go 0 for 10, if you can win 6 of your last 10 after you been eliminated, you actually have a 35% chance. So they reward you for pushing all the way to the end” (Via Road Trippin’ Show)

NBA Courtside

921,562 views • 6 months ago

OKC Head Coach Mark Daigneault was asked how they adjust after losses. “We don't wait to adjust to when we lose. We try to treat every game in a very neutral manner. Learn from the games. Improve certain things, adjust others. Keep some the same and that process is the same regardless of win or loss.” Too many people say, “You either win or you learn," but this framing is incomplete. If you only learn when you lose, you’re leaving growth on the table. Learning shouldn't be reserved for failure. Sometimes winning reinforces habits that won’t hold up later. The best teams (and leaders) don’t let the result dictate the reflection. The standard is the standard. It's not "You win or you learn." It's "Win or lose, you learn." 📹: Duane Rankin and AZ Central

OKC Head Coach Mark Daigneault was asked how they adjust after losses. “We don't wait to adjust to when we lose. We try to treat every game in a very neutral manner. Learn from the games. Improve certain things, adjust others. Keep some the same and that process is the same regardless of win or loss.” Too many people say, “You either win or you learn," but this framing is incomplete. If you only learn when you lose, you’re leaving growth on the table. Learning shouldn't be reserved for failure. Sometimes winning reinforces habits that won’t hold up later. The best teams (and leaders) don’t let the result dictate the reflection. The standard is the standard. It's not "You win or you learn." It's "Win or lose, you learn." 📹: Duane Rankin and AZ Central

Zach Brandon

40,653 views • 3 months ago

Peter Svidler, before round 7 started: "I don't think you will find very many examples of the reigning World Champion not playing board 1 in an absolutely critical central match of the #ChessOlympiad... For him not to want to play Gukesh in a match, China absolutely needs to win. If they (China) want to win this Olympiad, they need to win today. It is very difficult to take points off this Indian team. The fact that he (Ding Liren) is not sitting down to play chess today after the rest day is, I think, quite significant."

Peter Svidler, before round 7 started: "I don't think you will find very many examples of the reigning World Champion not playing board 1 in an absolutely critical central match of the #ChessOlympiad... For him not to want to play Gukesh in a match, China absolutely needs to win. If they (China) want to win this Olympiad, they need to win today. It is very difficult to take points off this Indian team. The fact that he (Ding Liren) is not sitting down to play chess today after the rest day is, I think, quite significant."

International Chess Federation

78,967 views • 1 year ago

🗣️Danny Rohl “We have a big opportunity to close the gap from 13 points to 2 points, and it's a great opportunity. It's a big game - but it's also a big game for Hearts. If you are 13 points ahead of a club and you drop maybe to two, maybe there's also pressure on them”

🗣️Danny Rohl “We have a big opportunity to close the gap from 13 points to 2 points, and it's a great opportunity. It's a big game - but it's also a big game for Hearts. If you are 13 points ahead of a club and you drop maybe to two, maybe there's also pressure on them”

Andy Newport

316,248 views • 6 months ago

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander on learning from playoff losses. “Whether you win or lose, you want to learn lessons from the game. When you lose, a lot of the lessons are a little bit louder, and that's just how we view it. You want to learn through the wins, but sometimes you lose, and you gotta get better. In a series, that's what it's about, getting better and being better when you're done with a series than you were when you started the series, and give yourself a chance, that's what we focus on.”

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander on learning from playoff losses. “Whether you win or lose, you want to learn lessons from the game. When you lose, a lot of the lessons are a little bit louder, and that's just how we view it. You want to learn through the wins, but sometimes you lose, and you gotta get better. In a series, that's what it's about, getting better and being better when you're done with a series than you were when you started the series, and give yourself a chance, that's what we focus on.”

Michael Martin

13,282 views • 2 months ago

Success is measured by how many losses you can take. If you can take a loss, you can take risks. And the more you risk, the more you can win.

Success is measured by how many losses you can take. If you can take a loss, you can take risks. And the more you risk, the more you can win.

Andrew Tate

144,039 views • 6 months ago

Jayson Tatum: "Early in your career, you get all the points and the stats... but then they say, 'you haven't won'. Now you're in a position to win a championship and now you're not scoring enough.'" 🗣️

Jayson Tatum: "Early in your career, you get all the points and the stats... but then they say, 'you haven't won'. Now you're in a position to win a championship and now you're not scoring enough.'" 🗣️

NBA TV

561,933 views • 2 years ago

So, my problem with this play is inconsistency in the rules. An inadvertent whistle from an official stops a play dead. It can take points off the board: you get a pick six, but an official accidentally blows up before the defense scores... no points. Here, a whistle blows, but you can just pick up a football and be awarded points? I don't see how you can reconcile those.

So, my problem with this play is inconsistency in the rules. An inadvertent whistle from an official stops a play dead. It can take points off the board: you get a pick six, but an official accidentally blows up before the defense scores... no points. Here, a whistle blows, but you can just pick up a football and be awarded points? I don't see how you can reconcile those.

Sam Monson

568,110 views • 8 months ago

Roger Federer won almost 80% of the 1,526 singles matches he played in his career. But he only won 54% of the points. The greatest tennis player of his generation lost almost every second point he played. He spent 2 minutes explaining what that taught him about success: The best in the world are not the best because they win every point. They're the best because they know they'll lose again and again, and they've learned how to deal with it. Think about that. Even top-ranked tennis players win barely more than half the points they play. Federer's insight: when you lose every second point on average, you learn not to dwell on every shot. You teach yourself to think: "Okay, I double faulted. It's only a point." "Okay, I came to the net and I got passed again. It's only a point." Even a great shot, an overhead backhand smash that ends up on ESPN's top 10 playlist, that too is just a point. Here's the mindset shift that separates champions from everyone else: When you're playing a point, it has to be the most important thing in the world. And it is. But when it's behind you, it's behind you. This isn't detachment. It's freedom. It frees you to fully commit to the next point with intensity, clarity, and focus. No baggage from the last mistake. No anxiety about the scoreboard. Just the next shot. Federer's definition of a champion: "You want to become a master at overcoming hard moments. That is to me the sign of a champion." Not a master at avoiding hard moments. You can't avoid them. A master at overcoming them. Watch him in a post-match interview after losing to Djokovic. Reporter: "It was a tough day today. You threw everything at him." Federer: "Yeah, absolutely. Novak played great. Not only today but the whole two weeks. Plus the whole year. Plus last year. Plus the year before that. He deserves it. Well done, Novak." No bitterness or excuses. Reporter: "So close in that first set. It could have been so different." Federer: "Maybe. That's sports. That's why we come to watch it. Just because you don't know the outcome." He continues: "Of course I had my chances in the first set, being up a break. Second set I got lucky to win that. Had some chances early in the third. But it's how it goes." "He was tougher on the bigger points. At the end he was rock solid. I thought he played great. I didn't play bad myself. So I can be very happy as well." Read that last line again. He lost a major final. And he said he can be "very happy as well." He's separating his performance from the outcome. He didn't play badly. Novak was just better on the day. That's it. Move on. Most people do the opposite. They win and think they're geniuses. They lose and think they're failures. Champions know better. You can play great and lose. You can play terribly and win. The point is behind you. The match is behind you. What matters is: did you fully commit? Did you bring intensity, clarity, and focus? If yes, you can be happy regardless of the scoreboard. This applies far beyond tennis. In your career, you'll lose almost half the points you play. The pitch that doesn't land. The promotion that goes to someone else. The project that fails. The rejection email. You can dwell on every shot. Replay every mistake. Carry the baggage into the next opportunity. Or you can say: it's only a point. It's behind me now. And commit fully to the next one. The best in the world aren't the best because they never fail. They're the best because they've learned how to deal with failure. Again and again and again. This 2 minute speech will teach you more about handling setbacks than every motivational video you've ever saved.

Roger Federer won almost 80% of the 1,526 singles matches he played in his career. But he only won 54% of the points. The greatest tennis player of his generation lost almost every second point he played. He spent 2 minutes explaining what that taught him about success: The best in the world are not the best because they win every point. They're the best because they know they'll lose again and again, and they've learned how to deal with it. Think about that. Even top-ranked tennis players win barely more than half the points they play. Federer's insight: when you lose every second point on average, you learn not to dwell on every shot. You teach yourself to think: "Okay, I double faulted. It's only a point." "Okay, I came to the net and I got passed again. It's only a point." Even a great shot, an overhead backhand smash that ends up on ESPN's top 10 playlist, that too is just a point. Here's the mindset shift that separates champions from everyone else: When you're playing a point, it has to be the most important thing in the world. And it is. But when it's behind you, it's behind you. This isn't detachment. It's freedom. It frees you to fully commit to the next point with intensity, clarity, and focus. No baggage from the last mistake. No anxiety about the scoreboard. Just the next shot. Federer's definition of a champion: "You want to become a master at overcoming hard moments. That is to me the sign of a champion." Not a master at avoiding hard moments. You can't avoid them. A master at overcoming them. Watch him in a post-match interview after losing to Djokovic. Reporter: "It was a tough day today. You threw everything at him." Federer: "Yeah, absolutely. Novak played great. Not only today but the whole two weeks. Plus the whole year. Plus last year. Plus the year before that. He deserves it. Well done, Novak." No bitterness or excuses. Reporter: "So close in that first set. It could have been so different." Federer: "Maybe. That's sports. That's why we come to watch it. Just because you don't know the outcome." He continues: "Of course I had my chances in the first set, being up a break. Second set I got lucky to win that. Had some chances early in the third. But it's how it goes." "He was tougher on the bigger points. At the end he was rock solid. I thought he played great. I didn't play bad myself. So I can be very happy as well." Read that last line again. He lost a major final. And he said he can be "very happy as well." He's separating his performance from the outcome. He didn't play badly. Novak was just better on the day. That's it. Move on. Most people do the opposite. They win and think they're geniuses. They lose and think they're failures. Champions know better. You can play great and lose. You can play terribly and win. The point is behind you. The match is behind you. What matters is: did you fully commit? Did you bring intensity, clarity, and focus? If yes, you can be happy regardless of the scoreboard. This applies far beyond tennis. In your career, you'll lose almost half the points you play. The pitch that doesn't land. The promotion that goes to someone else. The project that fails. The rejection email. You can dwell on every shot. Replay every mistake. Carry the baggage into the next opportunity. Or you can say: it's only a point. It's behind me now. And commit fully to the next one. The best in the world aren't the best because they never fail. They're the best because they've learned how to deal with failure. Again and again and again. This 2 minute speech will teach you more about handling setbacks than every motivational video you've ever saved.

Jaynit

40,649 views • 4 months ago

Repeating the same line over and over again isn't going to win you an Oscar. And it's certainly not going to win you the trust of the American people.

Repeating the same line over and over again isn't going to win you an Oscar. And it's certainly not going to win you the trust of the American people.

Republican Study Committee

21,086 views • 1 year ago

#kndFeaturing #Gemini_NT another great mindset to learn from gemini 🥹👏🏻 : "You never lose. You either win or learn" I personally think that when you lose or when you are not satisfied with the outcome. i think you learn from it and you gain some stuff from losing or from the dissatisfaction to make it better next time to win next time, or maybe if you win thats good for you but losing isn't always bad

#kndFeaturing #Gemini_NT another great mindset to learn from gemini 🥹👏🏻 : "You never lose. You either win or learn" I personally think that when you lose or when you are not satisfied with the outcome. i think you learn from it and you gain some stuff from losing or from the dissatisfaction to make it better next time to win next time, or maybe if you win thats good for you but losing isn't always bad

al🧸ྀི

22,273 views • 1 month ago