Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Students cannot be threatened with punitive action for expressing a different point of view or asking questions, Supreme Court Justice Ujjal Bhuyan said recently while delivering the convocation address at NLU, Delhi. Watch this to learn more.

Bar and Bench

687,673 subscribers

12,180 views • 12 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

2 Comments

CA Ishwaran मोदीजी मेरे गर्व11 days ago

Can student lynch security forces?

Satbeer Prajapati12 days ago

Mylord is saying absolutely correct brother 👍

Related Videos

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Delhi: Advocates at the Supreme Court read the Constitution's Preamble in support of the Jantar Mantar protest and against police action. Advocate Indira Jaising says, "We are here to stand with the students. We are here to stand on the side of justice. We are here to demand justice for the students. We are not here to agitate for ourselves. This is not about us. This concerns the rights of students, and it is the duty of lawyers to stand before the Supreme Court and demand justice for them. The role and function of the Supreme Court of India is to dispense justice. That is why we are here, in the temple of justice, with our demands." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

1,005,254 views • 1 month ago

#WATCH | Delhi | On Supreme Court directing the Central Government to develop a legal framework for domestic workers, Advocate Chandrika Prasad Mishra says, "Today, the Supreme Court of India's bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has passed a landmark judgment. They have specifically made recommendations and directed the Union Government of India, the Ministry of Law and Justice and the Ministry of Labour to frame guidelines for the protection of domestic workers. In this case, the complainant had filed a complaint to the police that her agency was not paying her a minimum wage as prescribed by the government. There were some serious allegations of trafficking as well... The matter travelled from the trial court to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court finally quashed the petition (of trafficking). Justice Surya Kant explained in detail that there is no specific law in India which regulates and protects the interests of domestic workers... This judgment would be very significant for domestic workers especially those who belong to the SC, ST, OBC and EWS communities..."

#WATCH | Delhi | On Supreme Court directing the Central Government to develop a legal framework for domestic workers, Advocate Chandrika Prasad Mishra says, "Today, the Supreme Court of India's bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has passed a landmark judgment. They have specifically made recommendations and directed the Union Government of India, the Ministry of Law and Justice and the Ministry of Labour to frame guidelines for the protection of domestic workers. In this case, the complainant had filed a complaint to the police that her agency was not paying her a minimum wage as prescribed by the government. There were some serious allegations of trafficking as well... The matter travelled from the trial court to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court finally quashed the petition (of trafficking). Justice Surya Kant explained in detail that there is no specific law in India which regulates and protects the interests of domestic workers... This judgment would be very significant for domestic workers especially those who belong to the SC, ST, OBC and EWS communities..."

ANI

10,114 views • 1 year ago

NALSAR students opposed the reported invitation to #Chief Justice of India #Surya Kant as chief guest at their convocation, following concerns over his reported remarks during a Supreme Court hearing. In response, the Bar Council of India directed State Bar Councils not to enrol #NALSAR’s 2026 law graduates until further orders. I opposes the BCI’s action, questioning the decision to penalise an entire graduating batch for the actions or views of some students. He argues that such collective action raises serious questions of fairness, proportionality and constitutionality, particularly when the professional future of an entire batch of young law graduates is affected.

NALSAR students opposed the reported invitation to #Chief Justice of India #Surya Kant as chief guest at their convocation, following concerns over his reported remarks during a Supreme Court hearing. In response, the Bar Council of India directed State Bar Councils not to enrol #NALSAR’s 2026 law graduates until further orders. I opposes the BCI’s action, questioning the decision to penalise an entire graduating batch for the actions or views of some students. He argues that such collective action raises serious questions of fairness, proportionality and constitutionality, particularly when the professional future of an entire batch of young law graduates is affected.

Vikas Singh

47,054 views • 1 month ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court asking High Courts to decide contempt petitions over the alleged violation of bulldozer action guidelines, Advocate Anas Tanweer says, “After the bulldozer guidelines were issued, there were certain states that did not follow those guidelines… Today, the Supreme Court, taking into account that there could be questions of fact—and the Supreme Court will not go into questions of fact—has remanded those matters to the jurisdictional High Courts. It has given them the power to entertain it as contempt of this Court, as well as asked them to take help from the sessions judge or the district judge concerned in case of fact-finding. The grievance must be addressed in the High Courts first, and obviously, a Special Leave Petition (SLP) against their order can be filed before the Supreme Court if the state or the parties are not satisfied.”

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court asking High Courts to decide contempt petitions over the alleged violation of bulldozer action guidelines, Advocate Anas Tanweer says, “After the bulldozer guidelines were issued, there were certain states that did not follow those guidelines… Today, the Supreme Court, taking into account that there could be questions of fact—and the Supreme Court will not go into questions of fact—has remanded those matters to the jurisdictional High Courts. It has given them the power to entertain it as contempt of this Court, as well as asked them to take help from the sessions judge or the district judge concerned in case of fact-finding. The grievance must be addressed in the High Courts first, and obviously, a Special Leave Petition (SLP) against their order can be filed before the Supreme Court if the state or the parties are not satisfied.”

ANI

31,780 views • 2 months ago

CM Shivakumar announces one more Karnataka Bhavan in Delhi for civil servant aspirants. CM said at least 50% of the accommodation would be reserved for SC/ST students, while remaining seats would be available to candidates from other categories. He is also exploring the possibility of engaging retired IAS, IRS and IPS officers in Delhi and would establish a dedicated legal cell in the national capital to handle Supreme Court cases

CM Shivakumar announces one more Karnataka Bhavan in Delhi for civil servant aspirants. CM said at least 50% of the accommodation would be reserved for SC/ST students, while remaining seats would be available to candidates from other categories. He is also exploring the possibility of engaging retired IAS, IRS and IPS officers in Delhi and would establish a dedicated legal cell in the national capital to handle Supreme Court cases

News Arena India

108,312 views • 2 months ago

HOLY SHIT. Listen to this exchange at the Supreme Court: Justice Alito: “For equal protection purposes, what does it mean to be a boy or a girl or a man or a woman?" Pro-trans lawyer: "We do not have a definition for the court.”

HOLY SHIT. Listen to this exchange at the Supreme Court: Justice Alito: “For equal protection purposes, what does it mean to be a boy or a girl or a man or a woman?" Pro-trans lawyer: "We do not have a definition for the court.”

Libs of TikTok

951,436 views • 8 months ago

“We are seeing young officers of the Indian Police Service going personally and assaulting protesters and demonstrators. It is very, very distressing to observe. The detachment expected of police officers somehow seems to be disappearing, and it is indeed a matter of grave concern.” — SC Judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan (yesterday at Yashovardhan Jha Azad Book release function ) on the assault of students by Delhi Police Delhi Police Commissioner Anurag Kumar should resign if he has any shame left after hearing this remark by a SC judge.

“We are seeing young officers of the Indian Police Service going personally and assaulting protesters and demonstrators. It is very, very distressing to observe. The detachment expected of police officers somehow seems to be disappearing, and it is indeed a matter of grave concern.” — SC Judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan (yesterday at Yashovardhan Jha Azad Book release function ) on the assault of students by Delhi Police Delhi Police Commissioner Anurag Kumar should resign if he has any shame left after hearing this remark by a SC judge.

Dr. Shama Mohamed

43,465 views • 9 days ago

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,556 views • 7 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | Cockroach Janta Party Chief Spokesperson Saurav Das says, "When the court is asking (from govt) for the list of FIRs to be quashed, then why are you not submitting it to the court? But you (govt) are showing hesitancy on this in the court. Don't play delay tactics with us. We will not accept this. They have identified around 2,800 hardened criminals; if they have to take action against them, then it is a different matter altogether. The issue relating to the students is the quashing of FIRs against them."

#WATCH | Delhi | Cockroach Janta Party Chief Spokesperson Saurav Das says, "When the court is asking (from govt) for the list of FIRs to be quashed, then why are you not submitting it to the court? But you (govt) are showing hesitancy on this in the court. Don't play delay tactics with us. We will not accept this. They have identified around 2,800 hardened criminals; if they have to take action against them, then it is a different matter altogether. The issue relating to the students is the quashing of FIRs against them."

ANI

156,266 views • 27 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP MP and Chairman of Bar Council of India, Manan Kumar Mishra, says, "The Supreme Court has taken this episode very seriously and an order for inquiry has been made. The Solicitor General was personally present in the court. He was very positive about it. He also said that we are going to find out who is responsible for this and those involved will be nabbed and appropriate action, serious action will be taken against them...Whatever books have been released, they should be withdrawn...The Bar is very much agitated against it. This action, the Bar cannot accept. Almost all the leaders of the Bar were present in the court and they were also assisting the Supreme Court in passing such an order. The bar is of the view that the move of the NCERT is very objectionable and serious action should be taken..."

#WATCH | Delhi | BJP MP and Chairman of Bar Council of India, Manan Kumar Mishra, says, "The Supreme Court has taken this episode very seriously and an order for inquiry has been made. The Solicitor General was personally present in the court. He was very positive about it. He also said that we are going to find out who is responsible for this and those involved will be nabbed and appropriate action, serious action will be taken against them...Whatever books have been released, they should be withdrawn...The Bar is very much agitated against it. This action, the Bar cannot accept. Almost all the leaders of the Bar were present in the court and they were also assisting the Supreme Court in passing such an order. The bar is of the view that the move of the NCERT is very objectionable and serious action should be taken..."

ANI

50,879 views • 6 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has allowed construction of President Trump’s White House Ballroom to PROCEED A HUGE blow to activist judges hellbent on kiIIing the project 🔥 The Supreme Court will be hearing the full case at some point, and Democrats wanted there to be a massive hole in the ground with construction halted for the months it’ll take for SCOTUS to rule. Trump wins

🚨 BREAKING: US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has allowed construction of President Trump’s White House Ballroom to PROCEED A HUGE blow to activist judges hellbent on kiIIing the project 🔥 The Supreme Court will be hearing the full case at some point, and Democrats wanted there to be a massive hole in the ground with construction halted for the months it’ll take for SCOTUS to rule. Trump wins

Nick Sortor

466,688 views • 24 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Supreme Court Collegium recommending transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court to his parent High Court in Allahabad after an adverse report against him, Senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "...The issue of corruption within the judiciary is a very serious issue. This is not something that has been articulated by senior councils and lawyers in the country for the first time. It has been going on for years. It is time for the Supreme Court to start looking at issues of how the appointment process takes place. The appointment process should be more transparent and carefully done...Corruption is a very serious issue and despite what PM Modi has said the corruption has increased..."

#WATCH | Delhi | On the Supreme Court Collegium recommending transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court to his parent High Court in Allahabad after an adverse report against him, Senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, "...The issue of corruption within the judiciary is a very serious issue. This is not something that has been articulated by senior councils and lawyers in the country for the first time. It has been going on for years. It is time for the Supreme Court to start looking at issues of how the appointment process takes place. The appointment process should be more transparent and carefully done...Corruption is a very serious issue and despite what PM Modi has said the corruption has increased..."

ANI

163,132 views • 1 year ago

This is happening right now at Oxford University. We have been contacted by concerned students at University of Oxford after the Radcliffe Camera was reportedly scaled by members of the Oxford Action for Palestine Society. For over fifteen months, Jewish students have endured an atmosphere of hostility and exclusion, with little action taken to address their concerns. This unacceptable reality cannot continue.

This is happening right now at Oxford University. We have been contacted by concerned students at University of Oxford after the Radcliffe Camera was reportedly scaled by members of the Oxford Action for Palestine Society. For over fifteen months, Jewish students have endured an atmosphere of hostility and exclusion, with little action taken to address their concerns. This unacceptable reality cannot continue.

Campaign Against Antisemitism

24,697 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde, who is appearing for Manish Sisodia, says, "Arvind Kejriwal had 10 points based on which he did not want Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma to hear this matter. The basic point was that detailed orders have been passed in past hearings, which have formed a strong view. Some other judge should hear this matter out... The Supreme Court has also said that if a judge has a particular view on an issue, the test is the likelihood of bias..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde, who is appearing for Manish Sisodia, says, "Arvind Kejriwal had 10 points based on which he did not want Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma to hear this matter. The basic point was that detailed orders have been passed in past hearings, which have formed a strong view. Some other judge should hear this matter out... The Supreme Court has also said that if a judge has a particular view on an issue, the test is the likelihood of bias..."

ANI

105,007 views • 5 months ago

Trump: I think the Supreme Court ought to be ashamed of itself for a lot of reasons. I've gotta live with these people. They'll only vote bad, and I couldn't care less at this point

Trump: I think the Supreme Court ought to be ashamed of itself for a lot of reasons. I've gotta live with these people. They'll only vote bad, and I couldn't care less at this point

Headquarters

133,522 views • 6 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Supreme Court rules stray dogs in Delhi-NCR not to be rounded up permanently, BJP leader Vijay Goel says, "I welcome the Supreme Court's order, but its implementation is very difficult. There are more than 12 crore dogs in the country, and more than 10 lakh dogs in Delhi alone. Every day, 2000 dog bite cases are reported. The Supreme Court has said that every dog should be sterilised and vaccinated... If the dogs bite, will it be the responsibility of the Supreme Court or of those NGOs who shouted and screamed that these stray dogs should remain on the streets?... Ultimately, they have given more importance to these stray dogs than to the human race. Humans are afraid of giving birth to children, but dogs give birth to four puppies at a time. In the times to come, this will become a city of dogs. Man will go inside their houses due to fear, and dogs will roam freely..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Supreme Court rules stray dogs in Delhi-NCR not to be rounded up permanently, BJP leader Vijay Goel says, "I welcome the Supreme Court's order, but its implementation is very difficult. There are more than 12 crore dogs in the country, and more than 10 lakh dogs in Delhi alone. Every day, 2000 dog bite cases are reported. The Supreme Court has said that every dog should be sterilised and vaccinated... If the dogs bite, will it be the responsibility of the Supreme Court or of those NGOs who shouted and screamed that these stray dogs should remain on the streets?... Ultimately, they have given more importance to these stray dogs than to the human race. Humans are afraid of giving birth to children, but dogs give birth to four puppies at a time. In the times to come, this will become a city of dogs. Man will go inside their houses due to fear, and dogs will roam freely..."

ANI

83,875 views • 1 year ago

Breaking || HC Judge's Observation on Jantar Mantar Protest Delhi High Court judge Justice Amit Mahajan on Friday orally observed that protests should ideally not be held at Jantar Mantar or within the city, remarking that the national capital cannot be 'put to ransom' because of demonstrations. Deepankar Malviya shares more details with ＠Swatij14

Breaking || HC Judge's Observation on Jantar Mantar Protest Delhi High Court judge Justice Amit Mahajan on Friday orally observed that protests should ideally not be held at Jantar Mantar or within the city, remarking that the national capital cannot be 'put to ransom' because of demonstrations. Deepankar Malviya shares more details with ＠Swatij14

TIMES NOW

25,331 views • 1 month ago

Fix Congress. Reform the Supreme Court. End money in politics. We cannot be afraid to fight for big reforms. Whether it’s paying more at the pump or struggling to afford a mortgage, kitchen-table problems will only be solvable when we deliver more accountability in government.

Fix Congress. Reform the Supreme Court. End money in politics. We cannot be afraid to fight for big reforms. Whether it’s paying more at the pump or struggling to afford a mortgage, kitchen-table problems will only be solvable when we deliver more accountability in government.

Pete Buttigieg

180,904 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | On SC Collegium recommending transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma of Delhi HC to his parent High Court in Allahabad after an adverse report against him, Retired Justice SN Dhingra says "What is there to say in this. Corruption in Judiciary is well known. Not just from today but from a long time. Action should be taken on this; they are also aware of it, but no such measure has been taken to correct it and to remove corruption. Till date, corruption is increasing and the common man has to bear the brunt of it...First of all, there are no rules for the judges of High Court and Supreme Court. When currency notes were caught in this, the Supreme Court should have immediately taken permission to register an FIR. Just like an FIR is lodged against a common man, similarly permission should be given to lodge an FIR against a judge and further action should be taken along with it. The Supreme Court should have done this..."

#WATCH | On SC Collegium recommending transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma of Delhi HC to his parent High Court in Allahabad after an adverse report against him, Retired Justice SN Dhingra says "What is there to say in this. Corruption in Judiciary is well known. Not just from today but from a long time. Action should be taken on this; they are also aware of it, but no such measure has been taken to correct it and to remove corruption. Till date, corruption is increasing and the common man has to bear the brunt of it...First of all, there are no rules for the judges of High Court and Supreme Court. When currency notes were caught in this, the Supreme Court should have immediately taken permission to register an FIR. Just like an FIR is lodged against a common man, similarly permission should be given to lodge an FIR against a judge and further action should be taken along with it. The Supreme Court should have done this..."

ANI

135,169 views • 1 year ago