正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

STUDY: High-dose IV vitamin C linked to LONG-TERM REMISSION in three advanced cancer patients who declined chemotherapy. Metastatic kidney cancer: lung tumors DISAPPEARED; remission lasted more than 4 YEARS. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer: no recurrence or spread 9 YEARS later. Stage III aggressive lymphoma: no signs of cancer 10 YEARS...

27,104 次观看 • 7 小时前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Megyn Kelly sat down with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong to discuss his revolutionary cancer protocol—a treatment that has already extended lives by years for patients with terminal diagnoses, including the late Senator Harry Reid. The Science Behind the Breakthrough Dr. Soon-Shiong’s approach challenges conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, which destroy the immune system’s natural killer (NK) cells and T-cells—critical for fighting cancer. His BioStripe treatment works by rebuilding the immune system, even in patients who have exhausted all other options. Real Patients, Miraculous Results Merkel cell carcinoma (5th-line treatment): Complete remission—patient lived 6+ years and didn’t die from cancer. Bladder cancer: Patients still alive 10-11 years later. Triple-negative breast cancer: Multiple complete remissions. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: One patient disease-free after 5 years, now 6+ years and counting. FDA Roadblocks & Lost Time Despite undeniable success, Dr. Soon-Shiong faced years of resistance from regulators. In 2015, he proposed testing his method before chemo/radiation—but the FDA insisted on starting with end-stage patients. After 700,000 pages of submissions, approval finally came in late 2024. The Future: Beyond Cancer This treatment isn’t just for cancer—it’s showing promise against sepsis and severe infections. One recent case: A Valley Fever patient on a ventilator, given last rites—fully recovered after treatment. The Urgent Question Why is bureaucracy slowing down a therapy that could save millions? With pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, and lung cancer patients still dying every day, how many more lives could have been saved if this had been fast-tracked?

Camus

615,118 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION Based on Dr. William Makis MD's commonly shared dosing framework Thousands of people reference this ivermectin dosing chart. Below is a simplified breakdown organized by body weight (mg/kg per day). 📌LOW DOSE ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Best For: • Cancers in remission • Strong family history or genetic predisposition • Preventive (prophylactic) use Reported Side Effects: • No long-term side effects reported Example: Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer patient who received chemotherapy plus 12 mg ivermectin daily. After 2 months, the tumor marker CA125 fell from 288 to 22, and the tumor was reported to have disappeared. 📌MEDIUM DOSE 1.0 mg/kg/day Best For: • Starting dose for many cancers including: • Lung cancer • Pancreatic cancer • Renal cell carcinoma • Gastric cancer Reported Side Effects: • No long-term side effects reported Example: Dr. Shankara Chetty reported a 70-year-old prostate cancer patient with a PSA of 89 taking 45 mg daily (along with lactoferrin). After 2 months, PSA reportedly decreased to 10.9. 📌HIGH DOSE 2.0 mg/kg/day Best For: • Aggressive cancers • Leukemia • Pancreatic cancer • Brain cancers Reported Side Effects: • No long-term side effects reported Example: Dr. Allan Landrito reported a Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient taking 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months, with the cancer reportedly disappearing. 📌VERY HIGH DOSE ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Best For: • Extensive metastatic disease • Extremely poor prognosis • Certain aggressive brain cancers Possible Side Effects: • Temporary visual disturbances • Usually, short lived and resolve within days Example: Dr. Shankara Chetty reported using 2.5 mg/kg/day in a patient with no side effects reported. #Ivermectin #MakisMD #Genixmeds

GENIX MEDS

31,014 次观看 • 1 个月前

A New Dawn in the Cancer War: Pioneering "BioShield" Technology Achieves Long-Term Remission Where Others Failed A stunning revelation from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong on the dawn of a new medical era. He details a breakthrough he calls "BioShield," a technology designed to prevent cancer by fundamentally educating the body's own immune system. Forget conventional vaccines. This isn't about antibodies. This is about creating a living, intelligent defense system within you. Here’s the concept: "BioShield" educates your T-cells to become elite "memory" cells. They then hide in your bone marrow, lying in wait. When a cancerous cell appears, they emerge to seek and destroy it—stopping cancer before it can ever gain a foothold. This isn't science fiction. It's peer-reviewed, published science with the National Cancer Institute (NCI). And the results are nothing short of remarkable: ➡️ Bladder Cancer: Patients who failed all other treatments and faced radical bladder removal have achieved complete remission for nine years after a simple injection. No surgery. Just a functional cure. ➡️ Pancreatic Cancer: A disease with a grim prognosis, now seeing patients disease-free for five years. The late Senator Harry Reid, after being told by others not to pursue it, saw his tumor markers normalize and lived two active, cancer-free years. ➡️ Merkel Cell Carcinoma & Head/Neck Cancer: Stories of complete responses in patients given weeks to live, with one living nine years and another saved from hospice when his ulcerating tumor melted away. Dr. Soon-Shiong is reframing the conversation. This isn't a "vaccine" in the traditional sense. It's Project BioShield—a proactive, cellular guardian for the body. The takeaway? We are transitioning from toxic, reactive cancer therapies to intelligent, preemptive protection. The age of the immune system as our most powerful shield against cancer has arrived. What are your thoughts on this "BioShield" approach to cancer?

Camus

31,203 次观看 • 8 个月前

Fenbendazole & Cancer Remission: The Peer-Reviewed Cases Challenging Modern Oncology A peer-reviewed medical publication has delivered a bombshell that the mainstream oncology world cannot ignore. It documents three cases of patients with advanced, metastatic cancer who achieved remarkable remissions after a radical course of action: self-medicating with veterinary-grade medication. The paper details three individuals who were essentially out of conventional options: ➡️ Case 1: An 83-year-old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had spread to her liver, lungs, and bones. After refusing chemotherapy and entering hospice care, she began a regimen of fenbendazole (a dewormer for dogs), Vitamin D, and multivitamins. By June 2022, her cancer was in complete remission. She has been cancer-free for over three years. ➡️ Case 2: A man with stage 4 prostate cancer and extensive bone metastases. While on standard hormone therapy, he added high-dose fenbendazole and a cocktail of supplements (Vitamin K2, magnesium, melatonin, curcumin). The result? Within 26 months, his cancer growth and spread had completely halted. ➡️ Case 3: A man in his 60s with advanced melanoma, slated for immunotherapy. While waiting for treatment, he began the same fenbendazole and vitamin protocol. By February 2024, before even starting the planned drug, his cancer had completely disappeared. The Critical Nuance Everyone Must Understand: The authors of this paper are NOT advocating for patients to self-medicate with veterinary drugs. The purpose of publishing these cases is precisely the opposite: to sound an alarm. When patients in desperate situations feel compelled to turn to clandestine, unapproved treatments, it is a clear sign that current options are failing them. This paper uses these dramatic "success stories" as a powerful call to action for the scientific community to launch proper clinical trials. The central question is no longer just if cancer metabolism can be targeted, but how we can safely and effectively harness these pathways. The combination of a repurposed drug with foundational lifestyle and nutritional support (the common denominator in all three cases) presents a compelling, albeit unorthodox, avenue for research. This is where the conversation about medical freedom, patient desperation, and scientific rigor collides. It underscores an urgent need to explore all promising pathways, especially those that are patient-driven, with the rigor they deserve. What are your thoughts on the role of repurposed drugs in modern oncology?

Camus

49,936 次观看 • 8 个月前

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?

Valerie Anne Smith

262,239 次观看 • 7 个月前

The Chemotherapy Paradox – A "Cure" That Preserves the Root of Cancer? You've been told chemotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer care. But what if the standard of care is fundamentally flawed, suppressing the very system designed to heal you while protecting the engine that drives the disease? In a stunning exposition, Dr. Paul Marik pulls back the curtain on oncology's biggest dilemma. Here's the shocking truth: - Chemotherapy annihilates your immune army. It wipes out your natural killer cells and T-cells—the very soldiers your body needs to fight cancer. You are immune-suppressed, allowing the tumor a clearer path to proliferate. - Chemotherapy preserves the cancer stem cell. This is the root of the tumor. While chemo kills rapidly dividing cells, it often leaves the stem cell—the queen bee—untouched. From this root, the cancer indefinitely divides, mutates, and regrows. - Some chemo drugs may even STIMULATE the stem cell. That's right. The very treatment intended to kill cancer can, in some cases, fuel its source. "So you can't cure the patient unless you get rid of the cancer stem cell," states Dr. Marik. "Interestingly, chemotherapy doesn't kill the stem cell." This explains why "remission" is not a "cure." The cancer can return 7, 8, or 10 years later because the root was never addressed. You are in remission, not cured. The conclusion? The high-dose, "burn-and-cut" approach of traditional oncology is not holistic. It weakens the host and empowers the enemy's most resilient forces. Dr. Marik confirms: The efficacy depends on the tumor type. Cancers with a low percentage of stem cells can see long-term remission. But for many, it's a ticking time bomb. This isn't an opinion; it's a biological reality. It’s time for a paradigm shift. Share this to spark a crucial conversation. The future of oncology depends on it.

Camus

69,487 次观看 • 8 个月前

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.

Joe Tippens

47,858 次观看 • 4 个月前

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness — information. Follow for more .IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses

Dr. Zakaria MD

57,857 次观看 • 1 天前

🚨 DR. WILLIAM MAKIS’ IVERMECTIN DOSING GUIDE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION IS SPREADING FAST ONLINE Thousands are now discussing Dr. William Makis MD’s categorized Ivermectin dosing approach based on body weight (mg/kg/day) and cancer severity. Here’s the breakdown people keep sharing: LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Often discussed for: • Remission support • Prevention strategies • Strong family cancer history ⚠️ Reports shared online describe minimal long term side effects at lower ranges. Access them via PharmacyinUSA MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day Most commonly discussed for: • Breast cancer • Lung cancer • Colon cancer • Pancreatic cancer • Renal cancers ⚠️ Supporters claim this is the “standard starting range” used in many repurposed drug discussions. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day Typically discussed for: • Aggressive cancers • Leukemia • Pancreatic cancer • Brain cancers ⚠️ Some anecdotal reports mention temporary visual side effects at higher dosing ranges. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Usually discussed only for: • Advanced metastatic disease • Late stage aggressive cancers ⚠️ High dose use remains highly controversial and experimental. Quick weight example for a 60 kg (132 lb) adult: • Low: 30 mg/day • Medium: 60 mg/day • High: 120 mg/day • Very High: 150+ mg/day Why this conversation keeps exploding online: ✅ Ivermectin has decades of human use worldwide ✅ Growing interest in repurposed cancer drugs ✅ Observational and preclinical research continues expanding ✅ Patients are increasingly sharing personal experiences publicly. (Jase Medical) Still, millions are now asking why inexpensive repurposed drugs are generating so much public interest while receiving so little mainstream discussion. **The chart has been upscaled for better visibility** #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole

PharmacyinUSA

90,785 次观看 • 2 个月前

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness — information. Follow for more .

mcgill_medicines

96,306 次观看 • 2 天前

"Biopsies Spread Cancer...Biopsies Are The Kiss Of Death. The Needle Punches A Hole In The Tumor, Dragging Cancer Cells & Spreading Them." Dr Ben Johnson Doctors Finally Admit That The Very Test Being Pushed On Patients Is Causing Cancer To Metastasize All Throughout The Body. The body self-contains a tumor within a fibrin sheath. A needle biopsy breaks the seal of the tumor that kept it contained & allows the pathogenic toxins &/or parasites to be unleashed. When a hornet's nest is poked, it doesn't calm the hive...it angers & scatters. That’s what happens when a needle pierces a tumor. Cancer cells are dragged into new territory, inflammation flares, the immune system gets distracted, and the “nest” gets angrier. Cells are dragged along the needle tract. Local inflammation activates tumor growth. The immune system is suppressed & cancer cells invade tissue, blood & lymph. Biopsies trigger metastasis, inflammation & tumor seeding: "Biopsy of primary tumors resulted in significantly increased incidence & number of lung metastasis."(PMID 25061543) "Biopsies promote intraperitoneal tumor dissemination & progression." (PMID 23258276) "Core needle biopsy of breast tumors increases distant metastases. (PMID 25425969) "Biopsies lead to tumor cell dissemination & seeding of malignant tumors." (PMID 22686607) "Human breast cancer biopsies enhance adjacent cancer cell proliferation." (PMID 27249999) Top Doctors Are Now Admitting 'That Standard Of Care' Is Killing Patients: "Manipulation of an intact tumor...is associated with an increase in the incidence of sentinel node metastasis." (John Wayne Cancer Institute 2022) "Cutting out a section...endangered the person's life by aggravating the malignant growth." (Dr Perry Nichols) "Biopsies spread early cancers." (Dr Jonathan Wright) "Biopsies introduce cancer cells into the bloodstream." (Dr Leonard Gomella) "Biopsies cause cancer cells to spread & the risk is higher in certain types of cancers like prostate & kidney cancers." (Dr Hal Schofield) "Biopsies cause cancer to disseminate further into the body & this has serious implications to patient outcomes." (Dr Robert Nagourney) Alternative Tests That Do Not Disturb Fibrin Sheath Of The Encapsulated Tumor: 1⃣ Multiparametric MRI (pmMRI): Non-invasive. No ionizing radiation. Detects structure & function in high resolution. 2⃣ Color Doppler Ultrasound: Maps tumor blood flow in real time. No radiation. No compression damage. 3⃣ Liquid Biopsy (ctDNA /CTC Testing): Blood test for cancer DNA or cells. No mechanical disruption of tumors. 4⃣ Thermography: Non-radiation, non-invasive technique that uses infrared cameras to detect heat patterns in tumors. Information is anti-fear. Knowledge is power. It gives you choices. It gives you power. If you’ve been diagnosed, please don’t rush. Research. Ask questions. Trust your intuition. Sometimes slowing down is the most urgent thing you can do. The cancer industrial complex is a powerful profit model & needs a massive overhaul. Too many patients blindly walk into these procedures without informed consent, never being told the risks. You can choose to not disturb the tumor at all & instead implement a protocol to shrink & enable the body to eradicate the tumor all together. Many cases of cancer tumors are actually parasitic eggs sacs misdiagnosed as cancer. There are ways to diagnose cancer without the risk of spread & acceleration. And ways to prevent & treat cancer without the harm of Chemotherapy & Radiation. There is a groundbreaking protocol by Dr William Makis, Dr Paul Marik & others that uses Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Methylene Blue, Fasting, Ketogenic Diet & other proven cancer remission strategies that addresses cancer & parasites simultaneously. ⏩ ⏪ 👇Seeding Tumor Cells Into Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Promotes Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Accelerates Cancer👇 Speaker: Justin Stellman

Valerie Anne Smith

768,769 次观看 • 10 个月前

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics, and they respond very well... [And] why do these antiparasitics work?" Todd Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Makis: "That's one possibility." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with attorney Todd Callender posted to the VaxxCHOICE (VaxxCHOICE) Rumble channel on November 21, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Dr. Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics and they respond very well. This is, you know, whether it's ivermectin, fenbendazole or mebendazole, these patients are responding. "Now this is very important because patients who've developed cancer after taking Covid vaccines, they don't respond usually to conventional treatments. That's one of the hallmarks of turbo cancer is they present at a very late stage. These are extremely rapidly growing tumors. They're coming in at stage four. And it's whether it's young women with breast cancer, women in their 20s, something we've never seen before, young women with, men and women with colon cancer in their 20s and 30s. "Again, we've never seen—" Callender: "Two- year-olds, I've heard of two- year-olds with colon cancer—" Dr. Makis: "—we've never seen this before. That's the incredible part. And they're not responding to conventional treatments. So, they're not responding to chemo, they're not responding to radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or if they do response, they have a very, very short response time or remission time. And then the cancer comes roaring back. "And in a lot of these tragic cases, the patient dies within six months. This is another one of the features of turbo cancer is the prognosis is extremely poor if you go the conventional route. So you need something else. Now when you're using antiparasitics, for cancer, the dose is higher than the dose you would use to treat parasites or to treat Covid. So I give just a rule of thumb for ivermectin, for example, it's about five times the dose that you would need for cancer, about 5 to 10 times the dose than if you were just treating parasites or viruses. "And to go into the— why does it work? Why do these antiparasitics work?" Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Dr. Makis: "Well, that's one possibility. But there's more to it than that because, out of the 400 papers that have been published, a lot of those researchers look at the mechanisms. They are trying to identify the mechanisms of how ivermectin is treating these cancers. "And you've got, for example, there was one study published a few years ago, Mexican researchers, again, you're not going to see this done in the United States, Mexico. Mexican researchers took 28 different cancer cell lines, applied ivermectin to them, and all of them responded. Now to various degrees, you had breast cancer and ovarian cancer actually responding the most to ivermectin. You had the most cancer cell killing when they were exposed to ivermectin. "But when they look at the mechanisms, they've identified a number of interesting things. For example, ivermectin shuts down and kills cancer stem cells. Now, this is important because cancer stem cells are the reason chemotherapy doesn't work. When you have stage four pancreatic cancer, stage four ovarian cancer, and you go to your oncologist, they will tell you, we will give you chemo, but we can't cure you. It's palliative chemo. It'll buy you an extra six months, an extra 12 months of life. "The reason why they say that is why the chemo is palliative, not curative. It's is because chemo cannot kill cancer stem cells, which are not rapidly dividing. Chemo will kill everything that's rapidly dividing, but cancer stem cells are not rapidly dividing. And so the chemo will kill the rapidly dividing tumor cells, and it'll leave the cancer stem cells alone, while the cancer stem cells will start rapidly dividing a year later, two years later, they're going to spread to other parts of the body. Suddenly you've got recurrence, you've got metastases. Ivermectin will shut down and kill cancer stem cells. "So imagine you, added to your chemo regimen, and now you've essentially turned what's palliative chemo or a palliative situation to potentially a curative situation. And I really do believe I've come to the point, having helped over 7,000 cancer patients in the last year, I've come to the point where I could confidently say that stage 4 pancreatic cancer is curable, stage 4 ovarian cancer is curable, stage 4 colon cancer, lung cancer. These cancers are curable. I think if you add repurposed drugs, you add antiparasitics, you can turn these into curable situations. "Now, of course, we have to prove that. We have to do the research, do the publications. But in the meantime, I say stage 4 cancer patients don't have 10 years to wait for mainstream oncology or mainstream medicine to catch up with what we're seeing already clinically, in practice."

Sense Receptor

96,616 次观看 • 8 个月前

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness — information is power. 💊

Valerie Anne Smith

961,548 次观看 • 2 个月前