Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

STUDY: High-dose IV vitamin C linked to LONG-TERM REMISSION in three advanced cancer patients who declined chemotherapy. Metastatic kidney cancer: lung tumors DISAPPEARED; remission lasted more than 4 YEARS. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer: no recurrence or spread 9 YEARS later. Stage III aggressive lymphoma: no signs of cancer 10 YEARS...

NicHulscher's profile picture

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

272,291 subscribers

59,745 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieGesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

STUDY FINDS CANCEROUS “CANNONBALL” LUNG TUMORS DISAPPEARED AFTER HIGH-DOSE IV VITAMIN C Three advanced cancer patients experienced LONG-TERM REMISSIONS lasting up to a DECADE after receiving repeated 15–65 g IV vitamin C infusions. All of them DECLINED chemotherapy.
1:18

STUDY FINDS CANCEROUS “CANNONBALL” LUNG TUMORS DISAPPEARED AFTER HIGH-DOSE IV VITAMIN C Three advanced cancer patients experienced LONG-TERM REMISSIONS lasting up to a DECADE after receiving repeated 15–65 g IV vitamin C infusions. All of them DECLINED chemotherapy.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

66,967 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Megyn Kelly sat down with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong to discuss his revolutionary cancer protocol—a treatment that has already extended lives by years for patients with terminal diagnoses, including the late Senator Harry Reid. The Science Behind the Breakthrough Dr. Soon-Shiong’s approach challenges conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, which destroy the immune system’s natural killer (NK) cells and T-cells—critical for fighting cancer. His BioStripe treatment works by rebuilding the immune system, even in patients who have exhausted all other options. Real Patients, Miraculous Results Merkel cell carcinoma (5th-line treatment): Complete remission—patient lived 6+ years and didn’t die from cancer. Bladder cancer: Patients still alive 10-11 years later. Triple-negative breast cancer: Multiple complete remissions. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: One patient disease-free after 5 years, now 6+ years and counting. FDA Roadblocks & Lost Time Despite undeniable success, Dr. Soon-Shiong faced years of resistance from regulators. In 2015, he proposed testing his method before chemo/radiation—but the FDA insisted on starting with end-stage patients. After 700,000 pages of submissions, approval finally came in late 2024. The Future: Beyond Cancer This treatment isn’t just for cancer—it’s showing promise against sepsis and severe infections. One recent case: A Valley Fever patient on a ventilator, given last rites—fully recovered after treatment. The Urgent Question Why is bureaucracy slowing down a therapy that could save millions? With pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, and lung cancer patients still dying every day, how many more lives could have been saved if this had been fast-tracked?
3:46

Megyn Kelly sat down with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong to discuss his revolutionary cancer protocol—a treatment that has already extended lives by years for patients with terminal diagnoses, including the late Senator Harry Reid. The Science Behind the Breakthrough Dr. Soon-Shiong’s approach challenges conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, which destroy the immune system’s natural killer (NK) cells and T-cells—critical for fighting cancer. His BioStripe treatment works by rebuilding the immune system, even in patients who have exhausted all other options. Real Patients, Miraculous Results Merkel cell carcinoma (5th-line treatment): Complete remission—patient lived 6+ years and didn’t die from cancer. Bladder cancer: Patients still alive 10-11 years later. Triple-negative breast cancer: Multiple complete remissions. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: One patient disease-free after 5 years, now 6+ years and counting. FDA Roadblocks & Lost Time Despite undeniable success, Dr. Soon-Shiong faced years of resistance from regulators. In 2015, he proposed testing his method before chemo/radiation—but the FDA insisted on starting with end-stage patients. After 700,000 pages of submissions, approval finally came in late 2024. The Future: Beyond Cancer This treatment isn’t just for cancer—it’s showing promise against sepsis and severe infections. One recent case: A Valley Fever patient on a ventilator, given last rites—fully recovered after treatment. The Urgent Question Why is bureaucracy slowing down a therapy that could save millions? With pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, and lung cancer patients still dying every day, how many more lives could have been saved if this had been fast-tracked?

Camus

615,291 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

100% Cancer Remission Achieved in ALL Patients in Groundbreaking Study Dr. Andrea Cercek, one of the lead researchers, said: “It’s absolutely incredible ... We’ve certainly never seen this before.” All 12 patients experienced complete rectal cancer remission after receiving dostarlimab, a monoclonal antibody. This particular monoclonal antibody achieved 100% cancer remission without chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or the toxic side effects that come with such therapies. The authors wrote: “All 12 patients (100%; 95% confidence interval) had a clinical complete response, with no evidence of tumor on magnetic resonance imaging ... and no cases of progression or recurrence had been reported during follow-up (range, 6 to 25 months after treatment). No adverse events of grade 3 or higher have been reported.” How does this monoclonal antibody actually work? Dr. Cercek explained that it essentially unlocks the body’s ability to heal itself.
3:28

100% Cancer Remission Achieved in ALL Patients in Groundbreaking Study Dr. Andrea Cercek, one of the lead researchers, said: “It’s absolutely incredible ... We’ve certainly never seen this before.” All 12 patients experienced complete rectal cancer remission after receiving dostarlimab, a monoclonal antibody. This particular monoclonal antibody achieved 100% cancer remission without chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or the toxic side effects that come with such therapies. The authors wrote: “All 12 patients (100%; 95% confidence interval) had a clinical complete response, with no evidence of tumor on magnetic resonance imaging ... and no cases of progression or recurrence had been reported during follow-up (range, 6 to 25 months after treatment). No adverse events of grade 3 or higher have been reported.” How does this monoclonal antibody actually work? Dr. Cercek explained that it essentially unlocks the body’s ability to heal itself.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,600,442 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

100% Cancer Remission Achieved in ALL Patients of Groundbreaking Study Dr. Andrea Cercek, one of the lead researchers, said: “It’s absolutely incredible ... We’ve certainly never seen this before.” All 12 patients experienced complete rectal cancer remission after receiving dostarlimab, a monoclonal antibody. This particular monoclonal antibody achieved 100% cancer remission without chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or the toxic side effects that come with such therapies. The authors wrote: “All 12 patients (100%; 95% confidence interval) had a clinical complete response, with no evidence of tumor on magnetic resonance imaging ... and no cases of progression or recurrence had been reported during follow-up (range, 6 to 25 months after treatment). No adverse events of grade 3 or higher have been reported.” How does this monoclonal antibody actually work? Dr. Andrea Cercek explained that it essentially unlocks the body’s ability to heal itself.
3:28

100% Cancer Remission Achieved in ALL Patients of Groundbreaking Study Dr. Andrea Cercek, one of the lead researchers, said: “It’s absolutely incredible ... We’ve certainly never seen this before.” All 12 patients experienced complete rectal cancer remission after receiving dostarlimab, a monoclonal antibody. This particular monoclonal antibody achieved 100% cancer remission without chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or the toxic side effects that come with such therapies. The authors wrote: “All 12 patients (100%; 95% confidence interval) had a clinical complete response, with no evidence of tumor on magnetic resonance imaging ... and no cases of progression or recurrence had been reported during follow-up (range, 6 to 25 months after treatment). No adverse events of grade 3 or higher have been reported.” How does this monoclonal antibody actually work? Dr. Andrea Cercek explained that it essentially unlocks the body’s ability to heal itself.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,527,788 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Great to see Dr Joe Ladapo and Dr William Makis collaborating on the use of ivermectin/fenbendezole in cancer treatment. Studies that verify the astonishing findings of Dr Makis. Who is treating over 6000 patients with great success in early stages of cancer. Achieving remission or significant shrinkage in tumours. Even having some success with stage 4 cancers. The Fenbendazole study showing patients going from stage 4 to cancer free and remained so up to 3 years. ‘That’s why the research is so important so that we can prove these things that I’m seeing in my clinic.’
3:34

Great to see Dr Joe Ladapo and Dr William Makis collaborating on the use of ivermectin/fenbendezole in cancer treatment. Studies that verify the astonishing findings of Dr Makis. Who is treating over 6000 patients with great success in early stages of cancer. Achieving remission or significant shrinkage in tumours. Even having some success with stage 4 cancers. The Fenbendazole study showing patients going from stage 4 to cancer free and remained so up to 3 years. ‘That’s why the research is so important so that we can prove these things that I’m seeing in my clinic.’

Kat A 🌸

39,866 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION Based on Dr. William Makis MD's commonly shared dosing framework Thousands of people reference this ivermectin dosing chart. Below is a simplified breakdown organized by body weight (mg/kg per day). 📌LOW DOSE ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Best For: • Cancers in remission • Strong family history or genetic predisposition • Preventive (prophylactic) use Reported Side Effects: • No long-term side effects reported Example: Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer patient who received chemotherapy plus 12 mg ivermectin daily. After 2 months, the tumor marker CA125 fell from 288 to 22, and the tumor was reported to have disappeared. 📌MEDIUM DOSE 1.0 mg/kg/day Best For: • Starting dose for many cancers including: • Lung cancer • Pancreatic cancer • Renal cell carcinoma • Gastric cancer Reported Side Effects: • No long-term side effects reported Example: Dr. Shankara Chetty reported a 70-year-old prostate cancer patient with a PSA of 89 taking 45 mg daily (along with lactoferrin). After 2 months, PSA reportedly decreased to 10.9. 📌HIGH DOSE 2.0 mg/kg/day Best For: • Aggressive cancers • Leukemia • Pancreatic cancer • Brain cancers Reported Side Effects: • No long-term side effects reported Example: Dr. Allan Landrito reported a Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient taking 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months, with the cancer reportedly disappearing. 📌VERY HIGH DOSE ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Best For: • Extensive metastatic disease • Extremely poor prognosis • Certain aggressive brain cancers Possible Side Effects: • Temporary visual disturbances • Usually, short lived and resolve within days Example: Dr. Shankara Chetty reported using 2.5 mg/kg/day in a patient with no side effects reported. #Ivermectin #MakisMD #Genixmeds
5:47

🚨IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION Based on Dr. William Makis MD's commonly shared dosing framework Thousands of people reference this ivermectin dosing chart. Below is a simplified breakdown organized by body weight (mg/kg per day). 📌LOW DOSE ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Best For: • Cancers in remission • Strong family history or genetic predisposition • Preventive (prophylactic) use Reported Side Effects: • No long-term side effects reported Example: Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer patient who received chemotherapy plus 12 mg ivermectin daily. After 2 months, the tumor marker CA125 fell from 288 to 22, and the tumor was reported to have disappeared. 📌MEDIUM DOSE 1.0 mg/kg/day Best For: • Starting dose for many cancers including: • Lung cancer • Pancreatic cancer • Renal cell carcinoma • Gastric cancer Reported Side Effects: • No long-term side effects reported Example: Dr. Shankara Chetty reported a 70-year-old prostate cancer patient with a PSA of 89 taking 45 mg daily (along with lactoferrin). After 2 months, PSA reportedly decreased to 10.9. 📌HIGH DOSE 2.0 mg/kg/day Best For: • Aggressive cancers • Leukemia • Pancreatic cancer • Brain cancers Reported Side Effects: • No long-term side effects reported Example: Dr. Allan Landrito reported a Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient taking 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months, with the cancer reportedly disappearing. 📌VERY HIGH DOSE ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Best For: • Extensive metastatic disease • Extremely poor prognosis • Certain aggressive brain cancers Possible Side Effects: • Temporary visual disturbances • Usually, short lived and resolve within days Example: Dr. Shankara Chetty reported using 2.5 mg/kg/day in a patient with no side effects reported. #Ivermectin #MakisMD #Genixmeds

GENIX MEDS

31,182 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A New Dawn in the Cancer War: Pioneering "BioShield" Technology Achieves Long-Term Remission Where Others Failed A stunning revelation from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong on the dawn of a new medical era. He details a breakthrough he calls "BioShield," a technology designed to prevent cancer by fundamentally educating the body's own immune system. Forget conventional vaccines. This isn't about antibodies. This is about creating a living, intelligent defense system within you. Here’s the concept: "BioShield" educates your T-cells to become elite "memory" cells. They then hide in your bone marrow, lying in wait. When a cancerous cell appears, they emerge to seek and destroy it—stopping cancer before it can ever gain a foothold. This isn't science fiction. It's peer-reviewed, published science with the National Cancer Institute (NCI). And the results are nothing short of remarkable: ➡️ Bladder Cancer: Patients who failed all other treatments and faced radical bladder removal have achieved complete remission for nine years after a simple injection. No surgery. Just a functional cure. ➡️ Pancreatic Cancer: A disease with a grim prognosis, now seeing patients disease-free for five years. The late Senator Harry Reid, after being told by others not to pursue it, saw his tumor markers normalize and lived two active, cancer-free years. ➡️ Merkel Cell Carcinoma & Head/Neck Cancer: Stories of complete responses in patients given weeks to live, with one living nine years and another saved from hospice when his ulcerating tumor melted away. Dr. Soon-Shiong is reframing the conversation. This isn't a "vaccine" in the traditional sense. It's Project BioShield—a proactive, cellular guardian for the body. The takeaway? We are transitioning from toxic, reactive cancer therapies to intelligent, preemptive protection. The age of the immune system as our most powerful shield against cancer has arrived. What are your thoughts on this "BioShield" approach to cancer?
5:12

A New Dawn in the Cancer War: Pioneering "BioShield" Technology Achieves Long-Term Remission Where Others Failed A stunning revelation from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong on the dawn of a new medical era. He details a breakthrough he calls "BioShield," a technology designed to prevent cancer by fundamentally educating the body's own immune system. Forget conventional vaccines. This isn't about antibodies. This is about creating a living, intelligent defense system within you. Here’s the concept: "BioShield" educates your T-cells to become elite "memory" cells. They then hide in your bone marrow, lying in wait. When a cancerous cell appears, they emerge to seek and destroy it—stopping cancer before it can ever gain a foothold. This isn't science fiction. It's peer-reviewed, published science with the National Cancer Institute (NCI). And the results are nothing short of remarkable: ➡️ Bladder Cancer: Patients who failed all other treatments and faced radical bladder removal have achieved complete remission for nine years after a simple injection. No surgery. Just a functional cure. ➡️ Pancreatic Cancer: A disease with a grim prognosis, now seeing patients disease-free for five years. The late Senator Harry Reid, after being told by others not to pursue it, saw his tumor markers normalize and lived two active, cancer-free years. ➡️ Merkel Cell Carcinoma & Head/Neck Cancer: Stories of complete responses in patients given weeks to live, with one living nine years and another saved from hospice when his ulcerating tumor melted away. Dr. Soon-Shiong is reframing the conversation. This isn't a "vaccine" in the traditional sense. It's Project BioShield—a proactive, cellular guardian for the body. The takeaway? We are transitioning from toxic, reactive cancer therapies to intelligent, preemptive protection. The age of the immune system as our most powerful shield against cancer has arrived. What are your thoughts on this "BioShield" approach to cancer?

Camus

31,209 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Fenbendazole & Cancer Remission: The Peer-Reviewed Cases Challenging Modern Oncology A peer-reviewed medical publication has delivered a bombshell that the mainstream oncology world cannot ignore. It documents three cases of patients with advanced, metastatic cancer who achieved remarkable remissions after a radical course of action: self-medicating with veterinary-grade medication. The paper details three individuals who were essentially out of conventional options: ➡️ Case 1: An 83-year-old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had spread to her liver, lungs, and bones. After refusing chemotherapy and entering hospice care, she began a regimen of fenbendazole (a dewormer for dogs), Vitamin D, and multivitamins. By June 2022, her cancer was in complete remission. She has been cancer-free for over three years. ➡️ Case 2: A man with stage 4 prostate cancer and extensive bone metastases. While on standard hormone therapy, he added high-dose fenbendazole and a cocktail of supplements (Vitamin K2, magnesium, melatonin, curcumin). The result? Within 26 months, his cancer growth and spread had completely halted. ➡️ Case 3: A man in his 60s with advanced melanoma, slated for immunotherapy. While waiting for treatment, he began the same fenbendazole and vitamin protocol. By February 2024, before even starting the planned drug, his cancer had completely disappeared. The Critical Nuance Everyone Must Understand: The authors of this paper are NOT advocating for patients to self-medicate with veterinary drugs. The purpose of publishing these cases is precisely the opposite: to sound an alarm. When patients in desperate situations feel compelled to turn to clandestine, unapproved treatments, it is a clear sign that current options are failing them. This paper uses these dramatic "success stories" as a powerful call to action for the scientific community to launch proper clinical trials. The central question is no longer just if cancer metabolism can be targeted, but how we can safely and effectively harness these pathways. The combination of a repurposed drug with foundational lifestyle and nutritional support (the common denominator in all three cases) presents a compelling, albeit unorthodox, avenue for research. This is where the conversation about medical freedom, patient desperation, and scientific rigor collides. It underscores an urgent need to explore all promising pathways, especially those that are patient-driven, with the rigor they deserve. What are your thoughts on the role of repurposed drugs in modern oncology?
9:55

Fenbendazole & Cancer Remission: The Peer-Reviewed Cases Challenging Modern Oncology A peer-reviewed medical publication has delivered a bombshell that the mainstream oncology world cannot ignore. It documents three cases of patients with advanced, metastatic cancer who achieved remarkable remissions after a radical course of action: self-medicating with veterinary-grade medication. The paper details three individuals who were essentially out of conventional options: ➡️ Case 1: An 83-year-old woman with stage 4 breast cancer that had spread to her liver, lungs, and bones. After refusing chemotherapy and entering hospice care, she began a regimen of fenbendazole (a dewormer for dogs), Vitamin D, and multivitamins. By June 2022, her cancer was in complete remission. She has been cancer-free for over three years. ➡️ Case 2: A man with stage 4 prostate cancer and extensive bone metastases. While on standard hormone therapy, he added high-dose fenbendazole and a cocktail of supplements (Vitamin K2, magnesium, melatonin, curcumin). The result? Within 26 months, his cancer growth and spread had completely halted. ➡️ Case 3: A man in his 60s with advanced melanoma, slated for immunotherapy. While waiting for treatment, he began the same fenbendazole and vitamin protocol. By February 2024, before even starting the planned drug, his cancer had completely disappeared. The Critical Nuance Everyone Must Understand: The authors of this paper are NOT advocating for patients to self-medicate with veterinary drugs. The purpose of publishing these cases is precisely the opposite: to sound an alarm. When patients in desperate situations feel compelled to turn to clandestine, unapproved treatments, it is a clear sign that current options are failing them. This paper uses these dramatic "success stories" as a powerful call to action for the scientific community to launch proper clinical trials. The central question is no longer just if cancer metabolism can be targeted, but how we can safely and effectively harness these pathways. The combination of a repurposed drug with foundational lifestyle and nutritional support (the common denominator in all three cases) presents a compelling, albeit unorthodox, avenue for research. This is where the conversation about medical freedom, patient desperation, and scientific rigor collides. It underscores an urgent need to explore all promising pathways, especially those that are patient-driven, with the rigor they deserve. What are your thoughts on the role of repurposed drugs in modern oncology?

Camus

50,224 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 GIVEN 2 TO 3 YEARS TO LIVE… THEN HER STAGE 4 SCANS CHANGED This woman with metastatic breast cancer says after adding Fenbendazole and later Ivermectin to her integrative protocol, her newest scan showed major changes. Her reported results after ~2.5 months: ✅ Prior spinal cord compression lesion: resolved ✅ Prior S1 spinal involvement: no longer detectable ✅ Suspicious liver lesions: no longer evident ✅ Prior lung nodules: no longer evident Why stories like this spread fast: Because for patients facing advanced cancer, even partial improvement matters. ⚠️ Not a medical advice, consult your doctor before taking any medications. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #CancerCure #CancerTreatment Source: Tiktok - fitjeanx_
2:51

🚨 GIVEN 2 TO 3 YEARS TO LIVE… THEN HER STAGE 4 SCANS CHANGED This woman with metastatic breast cancer says after adding Fenbendazole and later Ivermectin to her integrative protocol, her newest scan showed major changes. Her reported results after ~2.5 months: ✅ Prior spinal cord compression lesion: resolved ✅ Prior S1 spinal involvement: no longer detectable ✅ Suspicious liver lesions: no longer evident ✅ Prior lung nodules: no longer evident Why stories like this spread fast: Because for patients facing advanced cancer, even partial improvement matters. ⚠️ Not a medical advice, consult your doctor before taking any medications. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #CancerCure #CancerTreatment Source: Tiktok - fitjeanx_

PharmacyinUSA

24,859 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?
1:25

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?

Valerie Anne Smith

262,596 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

A powerful patient story from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong's discussion with Sean Spicer: A woman with advanced lung cancer—24 tumors (including thyroid), failed chemo/radiation, given 6-8 weeks to live—joined a trial combining Anktiva (N-803) with Keytruda. After stopping chemo, she felt immediate improvement: eating normally, no weakness, walking, gym, enjoying granddaughter, even running a festival. Scans showed shrinking tumors, thyroid gone; now 4+ years later, thriving with quality of life. Anktiva (FDA-approved 2024 for specific bladder cancer) boosts natural killer cells and T cells—key to immune attack on cancer. Soon-Shiong argues bureaucracy blocks broader access: Right to Try (advocated by Trump/Johnson) gets subverted by FDA delays/IRB hurdles; why require cancer-specific trials when NK-cell boosting helps regardless (like Epogen for anemia)? He's expanding to Canada, Europe, South Africa—where patients see responses in leukemia, etc.—while criticizing US red tape as life-costing. Inspiring remission vs. regulatory frustration: Does this highlight breakthrough potential or need for faster pathways? What's your take on access to immunotherapies like this? Real stories welcome below.
4:51

A powerful patient story from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong's discussion with Sean Spicer: A woman with advanced lung cancer—24 tumors (including thyroid), failed chemo/radiation, given 6-8 weeks to live—joined a trial combining Anktiva (N-803) with Keytruda. After stopping chemo, she felt immediate improvement: eating normally, no weakness, walking, gym, enjoying granddaughter, even running a festival. Scans showed shrinking tumors, thyroid gone; now 4+ years later, thriving with quality of life. Anktiva (FDA-approved 2024 for specific bladder cancer) boosts natural killer cells and T cells—key to immune attack on cancer. Soon-Shiong argues bureaucracy blocks broader access: Right to Try (advocated by Trump/Johnson) gets subverted by FDA delays/IRB hurdles; why require cancer-specific trials when NK-cell boosting helps regardless (like Epogen for anemia)? He's expanding to Canada, Europe, South Africa—where patients see responses in leukemia, etc.—while criticizing US red tape as life-costing. Inspiring remission vs. regulatory frustration: Does this highlight breakthrough potential or need for faster pathways? What's your take on access to immunotherapies like this? Real stories welcome below.

Camus

32,930 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The Chemotherapy Paradox – A "Cure" That Preserves the Root of Cancer? You've been told chemotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer care. But what if the standard of care is fundamentally flawed, suppressing the very system designed to heal you while protecting the engine that drives the disease? In a stunning exposition, Dr. Paul Marik pulls back the curtain on oncology's biggest dilemma. Here's the shocking truth: - Chemotherapy annihilates your immune army. It wipes out your natural killer cells and T-cells—the very soldiers your body needs to fight cancer. You are immune-suppressed, allowing the tumor a clearer path to proliferate. - Chemotherapy preserves the cancer stem cell. This is the root of the tumor. While chemo kills rapidly dividing cells, it often leaves the stem cell—the queen bee—untouched. From this root, the cancer indefinitely divides, mutates, and regrows. - Some chemo drugs may even STIMULATE the stem cell. That's right. The very treatment intended to kill cancer can, in some cases, fuel its source. "So you can't cure the patient unless you get rid of the cancer stem cell," states Dr. Marik. "Interestingly, chemotherapy doesn't kill the stem cell." This explains why "remission" is not a "cure." The cancer can return 7, 8, or 10 years later because the root was never addressed. You are in remission, not cured. The conclusion? The high-dose, "burn-and-cut" approach of traditional oncology is not holistic. It weakens the host and empowers the enemy's most resilient forces. Dr. Marik confirms: The efficacy depends on the tumor type. Cancers with a low percentage of stem cells can see long-term remission. But for many, it's a ticking time bomb. This isn't an opinion; it's a biological reality. It’s time for a paradigm shift. Share this to spark a crucial conversation. The future of oncology depends on it.
2:48

The Chemotherapy Paradox – A "Cure" That Preserves the Root of Cancer? You've been told chemotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer care. But what if the standard of care is fundamentally flawed, suppressing the very system designed to heal you while protecting the engine that drives the disease? In a stunning exposition, Dr. Paul Marik pulls back the curtain on oncology's biggest dilemma. Here's the shocking truth: - Chemotherapy annihilates your immune army. It wipes out your natural killer cells and T-cells—the very soldiers your body needs to fight cancer. You are immune-suppressed, allowing the tumor a clearer path to proliferate. - Chemotherapy preserves the cancer stem cell. This is the root of the tumor. While chemo kills rapidly dividing cells, it often leaves the stem cell—the queen bee—untouched. From this root, the cancer indefinitely divides, mutates, and regrows. - Some chemo drugs may even STIMULATE the stem cell. That's right. The very treatment intended to kill cancer can, in some cases, fuel its source. "So you can't cure the patient unless you get rid of the cancer stem cell," states Dr. Marik. "Interestingly, chemotherapy doesn't kill the stem cell." This explains why "remission" is not a "cure." The cancer can return 7, 8, or 10 years later because the root was never addressed. You are in remission, not cured. The conclusion? The high-dose, "burn-and-cut" approach of traditional oncology is not holistic. It weakens the host and empowers the enemy's most resilient forces. Dr. Marik confirms: The efficacy depends on the tumor type. Cancers with a low percentage of stem cells can see long-term remission. But for many, it's a ticking time bomb. This isn't an opinion; it's a biological reality. It’s time for a paradigm shift. Share this to spark a crucial conversation. The future of oncology depends on it.

Camus

69,487 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.
0:59

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.

Joe Tippens

47,858 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Cancer remission achieved with low-cost drug, a jaw-dropping case series reveals. 3 patients experienced complete remission after regularly taking fenbendazole. But the cancer industry seems to hate it because it only costs about $11 per week. Fenbendazole (FBZ) is a medicine originally designed to treat worms and parasites in animals. Its sister drugs, Mebendazole and Albendazole, have had remarkable success treating similar ailments in humans with few side effects. The case series highlights the remarkable stories of three cancer patients who achieved miraculous recoveries with fenbendazole after exhausting all conventional therapies. After analyzing these cases, the abstract concluded, “FBZ appears to be a potentially safe and effective antineoplastic agent that can be repurposed for human use in treating genitourinary malignancies.” Adding to the growing evidence in support of fendendazole’s use case against cancer, an Oklahoma man credited his miraculous cancer recovery to the pet med after overcoming terminal small cell lung cancer, defying a less than 1% survival rate and leaving doctors baffled. This story is truly remarkable. Watch. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
15:05

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Cancer remission achieved with low-cost drug, a jaw-dropping case series reveals. 3 patients experienced complete remission after regularly taking fenbendazole. But the cancer industry seems to hate it because it only costs about $11 per week. Fenbendazole (FBZ) is a medicine originally designed to treat worms and parasites in animals. Its sister drugs, Mebendazole and Albendazole, have had remarkable success treating similar ailments in humans with few side effects. The case series highlights the remarkable stories of three cancer patients who achieved miraculous recoveries with fenbendazole after exhausting all conventional therapies. After analyzing these cases, the abstract concluded, “FBZ appears to be a potentially safe and effective antineoplastic agent that can be repurposed for human use in treating genitourinary malignancies.” Adding to the growing evidence in support of fendendazole’s use case against cancer, an Oklahoma man credited his miraculous cancer recovery to the pet med after overcoming terminal small cell lung cancer, defying a less than 1% survival rate and leaving doctors baffled. This story is truly remarkable. Watch. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,166,512 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 DR. WILLIAM MAKIS’ IVERMECTIN DOSING GUIDE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION IS SPREADING FAST ONLINE Thousands are now discussing Dr. William Makis MD’s categorized Ivermectin dosing approach based on body weight (mg/kg/day) and cancer severity. Here’s the breakdown people keep sharing: LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Often discussed for: • Remission support • Prevention strategies • Strong family cancer history ⚠️ Reports shared online describe minimal long term side effects at lower ranges. Access them via PharmacyinUSA MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day Most commonly discussed for: • Breast cancer • Lung cancer • Colon cancer • Pancreatic cancer • Renal cancers ⚠️ Supporters claim this is the “standard starting range” used in many repurposed drug discussions. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day Typically discussed for: • Aggressive cancers • Leukemia • Pancreatic cancer • Brain cancers ⚠️ Some anecdotal reports mention temporary visual side effects at higher dosing ranges. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Usually discussed only for: • Advanced metastatic disease • Late stage aggressive cancers ⚠️ High dose use remains highly controversial and experimental. Quick weight example for a 60 kg (132 lb) adult: • Low: 30 mg/day • Medium: 60 mg/day • High: 120 mg/day • Very High: 150+ mg/day Why this conversation keeps exploding online: ✅ Ivermectin has decades of human use worldwide ✅ Growing interest in repurposed cancer drugs ✅ Observational and preclinical research continues expanding ✅ Patients are increasingly sharing personal experiences publicly. (Jase Medical) Still, millions are now asking why inexpensive repurposed drugs are generating so much public interest while receiving so little mainstream discussion. **The chart has been upscaled for better visibility** #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole
5:52

🚨 DR. WILLIAM MAKIS’ IVERMECTIN DOSING GUIDE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION IS SPREADING FAST ONLINE Thousands are now discussing Dr. William Makis MD’s categorized Ivermectin dosing approach based on body weight (mg/kg/day) and cancer severity. Here’s the breakdown people keep sharing: LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day Often discussed for: • Remission support • Prevention strategies • Strong family cancer history ⚠️ Reports shared online describe minimal long term side effects at lower ranges. Access them via PharmacyinUSA MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day Most commonly discussed for: • Breast cancer • Lung cancer • Colon cancer • Pancreatic cancer • Renal cancers ⚠️ Supporters claim this is the “standard starting range” used in many repurposed drug discussions. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day Typically discussed for: • Aggressive cancers • Leukemia • Pancreatic cancer • Brain cancers ⚠️ Some anecdotal reports mention temporary visual side effects at higher dosing ranges. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day Usually discussed only for: • Advanced metastatic disease • Late stage aggressive cancers ⚠️ High dose use remains highly controversial and experimental. Quick weight example for a 60 kg (132 lb) adult: • Low: 30 mg/day • Medium: 60 mg/day • High: 120 mg/day • Very High: 150+ mg/day Why this conversation keeps exploding online: ✅ Ivermectin has decades of human use worldwide ✅ Growing interest in repurposed cancer drugs ✅ Observational and preclinical research continues expanding ✅ Patients are increasingly sharing personal experiences publicly. (Jase Medical) Still, millions are now asking why inexpensive repurposed drugs are generating so much public interest while receiving so little mainstream discussion. **The chart has been upscaled for better visibility** #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole

PharmacyinUSA

91,070 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness — information. Follow for more .
1:00

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness — information. Follow for more .

mcgill_medicines

103,347 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

"Biopsies Spread Cancer...Biopsies Are The Kiss Of Death. The Needle Punches A Hole In The Tumor, Dragging Cancer Cells & Spreading Them." Dr Ben Johnson Doctors Finally Admit That The Very Test Being Pushed On Patients Is Causing Cancer To Metastasize All Throughout The Body. The body self-contains a tumor within a fibrin sheath. A needle biopsy breaks the seal of the tumor that kept it contained & allows the pathogenic toxins &/or parasites to be unleashed. When a hornet's nest is poked, it doesn't calm the hive...it angers & scatters. That’s what happens when a needle pierces a tumor. Cancer cells are dragged into new territory, inflammation flares, the immune system gets distracted, and the “nest” gets angrier. Cells are dragged along the needle tract. Local inflammation activates tumor growth. The immune system is suppressed & cancer cells invade tissue, blood & lymph. Biopsies trigger metastasis, inflammation & tumor seeding: "Biopsy of primary tumors resulted in significantly increased incidence & number of lung metastasis."(PMID 25061543) "Biopsies promote intraperitoneal tumor dissemination & progression." (PMID 23258276) "Core needle biopsy of breast tumors increases distant metastases. (PMID 25425969) "Biopsies lead to tumor cell dissemination & seeding of malignant tumors." (PMID 22686607) "Human breast cancer biopsies enhance adjacent cancer cell proliferation." (PMID 27249999) Top Doctors Are Now Admitting 'That Standard Of Care' Is Killing Patients: "Manipulation of an intact tumor...is associated with an increase in the incidence of sentinel node metastasis." (John Wayne Cancer Institute 2022) "Cutting out a section...endangered the person's life by aggravating the malignant growth." (Dr Perry Nichols) "Biopsies spread early cancers." (Dr Jonathan Wright) "Biopsies introduce cancer cells into the bloodstream." (Dr Leonard Gomella) "Biopsies cause cancer cells to spread & the risk is higher in certain types of cancers like prostate & kidney cancers." (Dr Hal Schofield) "Biopsies cause cancer to disseminate further into the body & this has serious implications to patient outcomes." (Dr Robert Nagourney) Alternative Tests That Do Not Disturb Fibrin Sheath Of The Encapsulated Tumor: 1⃣ Multiparametric MRI (pmMRI): Non-invasive. No ionizing radiation. Detects structure & function in high resolution. 2⃣ Color Doppler Ultrasound: Maps tumor blood flow in real time. No radiation. No compression damage. 3⃣ Liquid Biopsy (ctDNA /CTC Testing): Blood test for cancer DNA or cells. No mechanical disruption of tumors. 4⃣ Thermography: Non-radiation, non-invasive technique that uses infrared cameras to detect heat patterns in tumors. Information is anti-fear. Knowledge is power. It gives you choices. It gives you power. If you’ve been diagnosed, please don’t rush. Research. Ask questions. Trust your intuition. Sometimes slowing down is the most urgent thing you can do. The cancer industrial complex is a powerful profit model & needs a massive overhaul. Too many patients blindly walk into these procedures without informed consent, never being told the risks. You can choose to not disturb the tumor at all & instead implement a protocol to shrink & enable the body to eradicate the tumor all together. Many cases of cancer tumors are actually parasitic eggs sacs misdiagnosed as cancer. There are ways to diagnose cancer without the risk of spread & acceleration. And ways to prevent & treat cancer without the harm of Chemotherapy & Radiation. There is a groundbreaking protocol by Dr William Makis, Dr Paul Marik & others that uses Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Methylene Blue, Fasting, Ketogenic Diet & other proven cancer remission strategies that addresses cancer & parasites simultaneously. ⏩ ⏪ 👇Seeding Tumor Cells Into Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Promotes Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Accelerates Cancer👇 Speaker: Justin Stellman
1:32

"Biopsies Spread Cancer...Biopsies Are The Kiss Of Death. The Needle Punches A Hole In The Tumor, Dragging Cancer Cells & Spreading Them." Dr Ben Johnson Doctors Finally Admit That The Very Test Being Pushed On Patients Is Causing Cancer To Metastasize All Throughout The Body. The body self-contains a tumor within a fibrin sheath. A needle biopsy breaks the seal of the tumor that kept it contained & allows the pathogenic toxins &/or parasites to be unleashed. When a hornet's nest is poked, it doesn't calm the hive...it angers & scatters. That’s what happens when a needle pierces a tumor. Cancer cells are dragged into new territory, inflammation flares, the immune system gets distracted, and the “nest” gets angrier. Cells are dragged along the needle tract. Local inflammation activates tumor growth. The immune system is suppressed & cancer cells invade tissue, blood & lymph. Biopsies trigger metastasis, inflammation & tumor seeding: "Biopsy of primary tumors resulted in significantly increased incidence & number of lung metastasis."(PMID 25061543) "Biopsies promote intraperitoneal tumor dissemination & progression." (PMID 23258276) "Core needle biopsy of breast tumors increases distant metastases. (PMID 25425969) "Biopsies lead to tumor cell dissemination & seeding of malignant tumors." (PMID 22686607) "Human breast cancer biopsies enhance adjacent cancer cell proliferation." (PMID 27249999) Top Doctors Are Now Admitting 'That Standard Of Care' Is Killing Patients: "Manipulation of an intact tumor...is associated with an increase in the incidence of sentinel node metastasis." (John Wayne Cancer Institute 2022) "Cutting out a section...endangered the person's life by aggravating the malignant growth." (Dr Perry Nichols) "Biopsies spread early cancers." (Dr Jonathan Wright) "Biopsies introduce cancer cells into the bloodstream." (Dr Leonard Gomella) "Biopsies cause cancer cells to spread & the risk is higher in certain types of cancers like prostate & kidney cancers." (Dr Hal Schofield) "Biopsies cause cancer to disseminate further into the body & this has serious implications to patient outcomes." (Dr Robert Nagourney) Alternative Tests That Do Not Disturb Fibrin Sheath Of The Encapsulated Tumor: 1⃣ Multiparametric MRI (pmMRI): Non-invasive. No ionizing radiation. Detects structure & function in high resolution. 2⃣ Color Doppler Ultrasound: Maps tumor blood flow in real time. No radiation. No compression damage. 3⃣ Liquid Biopsy (ctDNA /CTC Testing): Blood test for cancer DNA or cells. No mechanical disruption of tumors. 4⃣ Thermography: Non-radiation, non-invasive technique that uses infrared cameras to detect heat patterns in tumors. Information is anti-fear. Knowledge is power. It gives you choices. It gives you power. If you’ve been diagnosed, please don’t rush. Research. Ask questions. Trust your intuition. Sometimes slowing down is the most urgent thing you can do. The cancer industrial complex is a powerful profit model & needs a massive overhaul. Too many patients blindly walk into these procedures without informed consent, never being told the risks. You can choose to not disturb the tumor at all & instead implement a protocol to shrink & enable the body to eradicate the tumor all together. Many cases of cancer tumors are actually parasitic eggs sacs misdiagnosed as cancer. There are ways to diagnose cancer without the risk of spread & acceleration. And ways to prevent & treat cancer without the harm of Chemotherapy & Radiation. There is a groundbreaking protocol by Dr William Makis, Dr Paul Marik & others that uses Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Methylene Blue, Fasting, Ketogenic Diet & other proven cancer remission strategies that addresses cancer & parasites simultaneously. ⏩ ⏪ 👇Seeding Tumor Cells Into Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Promotes Metastasis👇 👇Needle Biopsy Accelerates Cancer👇 Speaker: Justin Stellman

Valerie Anne Smith

770,354 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness — information is power. 💊
5:47

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness — information is power. 💊

Valerie Anne Smith

966,153 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness — information is power. 💊
5:47

IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION 1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day). LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** - Cancers in remission - Strong family history or genetic predisposition - Prophylaxis (preventive) **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished. MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9. HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers). **Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported. **Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared. VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day **Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers. **Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days). **Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported. **Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):** - Low: ≤30 mg/day - Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid) - High: 120 mg/day - Very High: ≥150 mg/day Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary. Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only. Share to spread awareness — information is power. 💊

Joe Tippens

135,627 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat