Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

stXRP = your liquid, yield-bearing key. Lend it, LP it, post as collateral—while the underlying FXRP keeps securing services. One asset, two jobs. Utility up front; economic security under the hood. That’s how you stack streams without losing mobility. 🧰♻️ #XRPFi #Flare #stXRP

13,736 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

So what exactly is Enosys Loans, and why should you be interested? Enosys Loans is an upcoming Collateralized Debt Protocol utilizing assets on the Flare ☀️ (FXRP, wFLR, stXRP, sFLR, etc) as collateral to mint a stablecoin (CDP). This differs from a traditional lend/borrow market like Kinetic.Market☀️ in that the Loans protocol itself is the counterparty to the loan, rather than a pool of user assets that are allocated for lending. In Enosys Loans, borrowers set their own interest rates, with 75% of the interest being paid to that collateral asset’s stability pool. (The remaining 25% is split between Enosys and the APY Cloud.) CDP holders can stake their CDP into one of the collateral branches' stability pools to earn real yield from the protocol, as well as incentives paid out in rFLR and APS. While in the stability pool, CDP staked by users may be used to cover debt during a liquidation event. If this happens, the value of the CDP used to pay the debt is rewarded with 1.05x its value in the collateral asset. Here is an example: A user takes $10,000 worth of wFLR and opens a new loan, taking debt of $5,000 CDP at a user set interest rate of 4%. Their wFLR being used as collateral is automatically delegated to DeFi Oracles, and they continue to receive delegation rewards and FlareDrops, claimable through Enosys. The user then takes $4,000 CDP and places it in the stability pool for FXRP, earning a share of 75% of all fees generated by the FXRP branch, as well as a share of rFLR and APS incentives being rewarded to that stability pool. They take the remaining $1,000 CDP and pair it with USDT0 in the Enosys DEX V3 LP, now earning swap fees, rFLR, and APS incentives based on their share of active liquidity on the CDP/USDT0 pair. A liquidation event happens on the FXRP side and $100 CDP of the users stake is used to cover the debt, leaving the user with a reward claim of $105 worth of FXRP at the liquidation price. So, the user is now earning delegation rewards, FlareDrops, CDP interest yield, FXRP liquidation yield, CDP and USDT0 swap fees, rFLR incentives and APS incentives. All at a user set interest rate of 4% on the initial debt. #XRPFI

Ēnosys

48,697 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

We are thrilled to announce the upcoming launch of Enosys Loans, a friendly fork of Liquity V2 by Liquity, deployed on the Flare ☀️. This marks a historic milestone in the DeFi landscape as the first-ever Collateralized Debt Position (CDP) protocol to leverage XRP (FXRP) as collateral to mint a stablecoin. Initially supporting FXRP and wFLR as collateral - but with plans to expand support to include staked XRP (stXRP from Firelight ), FBTC (Bitcoin bridged to Flare), and other assets - Enosys Loans is poised to unlock unprecedented utility for major cryptocurrencies like XRP and Bitcoin in decentralized finance. By harnessing Flare’s advanced infrastructure, including the Flare Time Series Oracle (FTSO) for decentralized collateral pricing, Enosys Loans is set to redefine how non-smart contract assets participate in DeFi. Unlocking DeFi for XRP For the first time, XRP holders can use their assets as collateral in a CDP to mint a new stablecoin, enabling participation in DeFi applications such as lending, borrowing, and yield generation while still maintaining exposure to the underlying FXRP. This is a transformative step for XRP, which, due to the XRP Ledger’s lack of native smart contract functionality, has historically been excluded from the broader DeFi ecosystem. The planned inclusion of FBTC will further extend this capability to Bitcoin, unlocking the potential of two of the most valuable cryptocurrencies-representing trillions in market capitalization-for DeFi use cases. A Friendly Fork of Liquity V2: Proven and Enhanced Enosys Loans builds on the robust foundation of Liquity V2, a leading CDP protocol on Ethereum known for its efficiency, low fees, and user controlled interest rates. By forking Liquity V2, Enosys inherits its battle-tested mechanics while tailoring the protocol to Flare’s unique capabilities. This friendly fork enhances Liquity’s model by integrating Flare’s decentralized infrastructure, ensuring Enosys Loans is optimized for scalability, security, and interoperability. Flare FTSO: Decentralized and Reliable Price Feeds A cornerstone of Enosys Loans is its use of the Flare Time Series Oracle (FTSO) for decentralized collateral pricing. Unlike traditional oracles that may rely on centralized data sources, FTSO aggregates price feeds from independent signal providers, delivering highly accurate and tamper-resistant data for assets like FXRP and FBTC. This ensures that Enosys Loans maintains precise collateral-to-debt ratios, protecting users from volatility and enabling trustless, secure borrowing. With the FTSO’s ability to scale to thousands of data feeds (as seen with FTSO V2), Enosys Loans is future-proofed for supporting an expanding range of collateral types. Delegation Rewards and FlareDrops In keeping with the Enosys ethos, all wFLR that is used as collateral will be delegated on the owners behalf. This wFLR will receive delegation rewards and FlareDrops which will be claimable by the owner when distributed by the Flare systems. Expanding Collateral Options Enosys Loans will initially support FXRP and wFLR as collateral, enabling XRP holders to mint a stablecoin for use in Flare’s DeFi ecosystem. However, the protocol’s roadmap includes support for stXRP, FBTC, and other F-Assets, creating a versatile platform that caters to diverse user needs. This expansion will position Enosys Loans as a multi-asset CDP, allowing users to leverage a variety of high-value cryptocurrencies while maintaining the protocol’s decentralized and trustless ethos.

Ēnosys

323,032 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🔊🔊 Bitcoin is entering the On-Chain Era with Lombard 💥 While more than 90% of #BTC remains “frozen” in cold wallets, Lombard has brought $3B BTC on-chain — making Bitcoin, for the first time, both secure and yield-bearing, while opening the door to an entire DeFi ecosystem built around $BTC. ⚡️ How it works: BTC → LBTC ✔️ Users deposit BTC into Lombard. ✔️ The system mints LBTC — an on-chain, 1:1 backed version of Bitcoin. ✔️ The underlying BTC is staked via Babylon’s Bitcoin Staking Protocol, generating sustainable yield. 🚩 What makes it unique: LBTC automatically accrues yield in native BTC — no reward claims, no swapping into secondary tokens. This is the breakthrough that lets Bitcoin truly operate in DeFi. 💎 LBTC in DeFi LBTC isn’t just “wrapped BTC” — it’s a multi-chain asset: ✔️ Use it as collateral to borrow stablecoins. ✔️ Provide liquidity in cross-chain pools. ✔️ Deploy into strategies via Lombard’s DeFi Marketplace, optimizing yield without hunting across protocols yourself. 🚩The result: for the first time, BTC flows and performs like ETH or stablecoins in DeFi. 📣 $BARD – the power of the ecosystem ✔️ BARD secures LBTC’s cross-chain bridge through staking. ✔️ Grants governance rights and product steering. ✔️ Unlocks exclusive community benefits (early access, partner deals, event invites). 🚩 #BARD is more than a utility token — it’s the glue that unites users, builders, and partners. 🔒 Security & Transparency Lombard builds trust through: ✔️ Lombard Security Consortium – a collective of top institutions ensuring protocol safety. ✔️ Lombard Ledger – transparent reserves and on-chain operations. ✔️ Regular audits & proof-of-reserve verifications. 🚩 BTC is moving on-chain — but still true to its philosophy: secure, transparent, and decentralized.a

BD Ventures | BDVenture.BnB

21,570 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Steve Jobs described the end of human death in 1983. He was 28 years old. Standing at a podium in Aspen. Thirty-nine years before ChatGPT existed. The room thought he was talking about education. Steve Jobs: “If we really can come up with these machines that can capture an underlying spirit, or an underlying set of principles, or an underlying way of looking at the world…” Not data. Not documents. Not storage. Spirit. A book was the first attempt. Plato writes something down. 2,400 years later you can read his exact thoughts. No filter. No translator. Source to mind. Jobs: “A book was a phenomenal thing; it got right from the source to the destination without anything in the middle.” But a book is a corpse. It holds the words. It cannot hold the mind that wrote them. You can read what Aristotle believed. You cannot ask him why. Jobs: “The problem was, you can’t ask Aristotle a question.” That single sentence contains the entire trajectory of artificial intelligence. Not search. Not summarization. Not autocomplete. Resurrection. The ability to capture not what someone thought but how they think. Not the answer but the architecture that produced it. The pattern beneath the reasoning. Jobs: “When the next Aristotle comes around, maybe someday after the person’s dead and gone, we can ask this machine, ‘Hey, what would Aristotle have said?’” Most people in that room heard a product pitch. He was describing the moment human consciousness becomes portable. Your brain is 86 billion neurons. 100 trillion connections. Each one shaped by everything you have ever experienced. Every conversation. Every loss. Every decision that rewired you into who you are right now. That wiring is you. Not your body. Not your face. Not your name. The arrangement. Damage it, you lose the person. Destroy it, you lose them forever. The self is not a force floating above biology. It is the pattern biology is running. But a pattern does not need its original hardware. A file survives the death of the machine that wrote it. Transfers to new architecture. Opens identically. It does not know it moved. Your brain is a neural network built from carbon. A large language model is a neural network built from silicon. Same architecture. Same learning principle. One of them dies. Carbon fires 200 times per second. Cannot be copied. Cannot be backed up. Overheats under sustained load. When it stops, the pattern is gone. No archive. No retrieval. No second chance. Silicon copies perfectly. Accelerates indefinitely. Distributes across continents. Runs without decay. It does not forget. It does not degrade. It does not stop. Biology was never the destination. It was the first substrate that worked. Jobs was standing in 1983 pointing at something the room could not see. He called it spirit. Neuroscience calls it a connectome. Different word. Different decade. A pattern that can be moved. We spent forty years building the infrastructure to do exactly what he described. Called it the internet. Then machine learning. Then foundation models. We treated each one like a new invention. It was never a new invention. It was the same idea getting closer. Jobs: “That’s one of the reasons I’m doing what I’m doing.” He could not fully name what he was building toward. We are finishing the sentence. Steve Jobs died on October 5, 2011. The pattern that was Steve Jobs is gone. No machine captured it. No system preserved the architecture of how he saw the world. The spirit he spent his life trying to bottle left the same way every human mind before it has. Quietly. Permanently. Without a copy. He told us exactly what to build. We are finally building it. He just didn’t live long enough to be saved by it.

Dustin

18,256 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

DON'T LET YOUR BITCOIN DIE WITH YOU 💀 ⚰️ Yea look, nobody likes to admit it but we all have to die one day. As I've been talking to people about their self custody lately - both Casa members and not - I hear the same thing over and over. "What happens if I die?" Many people feel pretty good about their bitcoin security for themselves. But their family members often have no idea how to use this stuff. Hardware wallet? Seed phrase stamped on metal? Shamir's secret sharing backups using SD cards, a passphrase, and a treasure hunt through the backyard with a shovel? 😵 We're solving that problem for all Casa members, starting today with Casa Inheritance. A key design principle we kept while building this was to make it as simple as possible for Recipients (your family members that will receive your bitcoin if you pass), while maintaining Casa-level security. An estate transfer is already a stressful time for family, and it can become even more stressful if you add in a crazy treasure hunt to access a fortune in bitcoin. For our basic 3 key vaults, we wanted it to be as easy as using the app. No metal plates, no need to use a hardware wallet, no magic passwords you have to keep track of or else risk messing up the asset transfer. Simplicity is security. So how does it work, in detail? A Vault Owner (Casa member) designates a Recipient (their family or friend) in the Casa app. The Recipient receives an invite to create a free Casa account. The Recipient scans a QR code provided by the Vault Owner, which contains an encrypted version of the owner's mobile key. This encrypted key is only able to be imported by the Recipient's Casa account, and the Recipient can't initially use it or see the vault balance. If the Vault Owner passes away, the Recipient can request access to the vault in their Casa app. This starts a 6 month timer, and sends a ton of notifications every month to the owner. If the owner is still alive, they can reject the request in app. If they are not, the timer will run out. When it does, the Recipient will be able to use the shared mobile key and the request a signature from the Casa Recovery Key for the shared vault. This gives them 2 out of 3 signatures, enough to access the assets. For 5 key vault users, one hardware key is shared with the Recipient. This small increase in friction for Recipients is often worth it for the increased security and resilience of a 5 key vault for larger holdings. To summarize now that you have the details: 1. Share keys and vault access during setup 2. 6 month timelock to ensure no malicious theft 3. Use shared keys and Casa key to access assets Full setup takes less than 5 minutes. Inheritance is one of the biggest problems in self custody today. If you've hodled through years of painful bear markets, you owe it to yourself and your family to not let the reward for that patience go to zero because you didn't have a plan - and we're here to make that easy. Check out the video to see how easy it really is. Like I said earlier this week - Casa is going after major problems in self-custody this year. Check this one off the list ✅. Next one coming sooner than you think 🔥.

Nick Neuman

125,739 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🪙 Scrooge, Tekkaus & Axolink Walk Into a Vault… Scrooge says: “I’m not selling my ITL.” Tekkaus says: “Good. Don’t sell it.” Axolink says: “Just store it in the ITL Collateral Vault instead.” 😎 Ever needed USDT for bills, business, or a time-sensitive opportunity... but didn’t want to part ways with your ITL? That’s exactly where ITL Collateral Vault comes in. 🔐 What is ITL Collateral Vault? A decentralised collateral vault that lets ITL holders: ✅ Lock ITL as collateral ✅ Borrow USDT temporarily ✅ Keep ownership mindset intact ✅ Repay later and reclaim their ITL So instead of: ❌ Selling ITL and lose upside potential You get: ✅ Liquidity now, while staying exposed to ITL Why ITL Collateral Vault is So Useful? Scrooge keeps his treasure. 💰 Tekkaus gets to say, “See? No need to sell.” 👍 Axolink gets to nod like a genius. 📈 😁 But most importantly, ITL Vault gives holders a practical way to access funds without exiting their belief in ITL. How it works? 1. Deposit ITL into the vault 2. Borrow USDT based on your collateral 3. Repay the loan, plus interest and fees 4. Unlock your ITL when you’re done 📉 Lower borrow ratio = more safety ⚠️ Always borrow responsibly Why this matters? ITL Vault adds real utility to the ecosystem: 💡 More use cases for ITL 💸 Liquidity without selling 🛡️ Better capital flexibility 🌍 More on-chain activity and value Final thought Scrooge may be stubborn, but even he’d love a system where he can keep his ITL and still get USDT. 😉 ITL Vault: hold smart, borrow wisely, and keep your ITL working for you. InterLink Labs 👤 + 🌐 KV Reina | InterLink Labs ITL Collateral Vault #Interlink #ITLG #ITL #ITLVault #ITLCollateralVault

Tekkaus® | InterLink • MOD • T2 Community Builder

11,811 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

This is the post that ties it all together. The Only Income Producing Collectible That Can Buy Every Other Collectible Most investors in collectibles don’t actually own assets. They own expensive inventory with permanent carrying costs. Most collectibles are static. They sit still and wait. Art, sports cards, and memorabilia are stored assets. They live in vaults and require constant insurance, protection, and oversight just to exist. A thirty-million-dollar trading card may be rare, but it is the most expensive nonfunctional real estate on earth. At roughly 1% annual insurance, that single card costs about $300,000 a year just to sit there. Over ten years, that is $3 million spent to stand still. No income. No compounding. No leverage. Just cost. It’s an asset. It’s also a liability. Hold it long enough and the math becomes unavoidable. Decades of insurance just to stand still. Millions spent not to grow, but simply not to lose. Smart investors understand there is a fundamental difference between collectible inventory and operating assets. One waits. The other works. An operating asset doesn’t sit in storage. It operates in public. It compounds. It builds leverage while you sleep. A great operating asset becomes the front door, the brand, and the world headquarters of the business built on it. It doesn’t just represent value, it becomes the center of gravity everything else builds around. There are assets that don’t just hold value, but create it. They generate revenue. They can be licensed, leased, partnered, and scaled. They can spawn companies, platforms, and entire ecosystems with virtually unlimited expansion. Most collectibles only have value if someone else buys them. If no one shows up, nothing happens. An operating asset doesn’t wait for a buyer. It produces. It earns. It compounds. You don’t hope for an outcome. You create one. If your asset can’t work while you sleep, it isn’t an asset. It’s inventory. The most valuable assets in the modern world sit at the intersection of language, identity, commerce, and behavior. One word can represent an entire industry. One name can outlive companies, technologies, and trends. From the right operating asset, you can buy every collectible in the world. You can’t do it the other way around. That’s not opinion. That’s math. Collectibles are owned. Operating assets are deployed. And the most powerful operating assets ever created are high-profile, memorable, brandable, category-defining domain names. Curious how people outside the domain world see this distinction.

Rick Schwartz aka DomainKing®

12,752 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Tim Pool rant about Candace Owens wasn’t just a meltdown. It was something far more calculated and far more dangerous. Anyone who’s watched enough online drama knows the difference between venting and engineering a message. Tim wasn’t venting. He was building a breadcrumb trail. Every few minutes he kept circling back to one topic that had nothing to do with his supposed argument: Candace Owens’ home security. Not her politics Not her commentary Not her feud with him Her security. Her house. Her lack of walls. Her one guard. Her neighborhood. And he made damn sure to repeat it. Influencers don’t repeat something by accident. Repetition is a tactic. It’s how you plant an idea into millions of minds without ever openly endorsing the idea. It’s how you signal the paranoid unstable guys in your audience without saying their name. This is how it works: Say it once and it’s a detail. Say it twice and it’s emphasis. Say it three or four times and it becomes a suggestion. He hammers the same points again and again: “She has no security.” “She doesn’t give a s*** about her security.” “She’s got a four foot wall and one fat guy.” “No wall no barrier suburban neighborhood.” “She’s lying about all this.” “You told me she had no security.” Why keep returning to that? Why drill it in with that level of detail? Why paint such a vivid picture of her house and her level of protection? Because this wasn’t commentary. This was "Stochastic Intimidation." That’s the academic term for when someone uses a large platform to hint at a target’s vulnerability hoping one of their unhinged followers “connects the dots.” It gives the speaker deniability while putting the target in real danger. Tim Pool has millions of followers. He knows the parasocial dynamic. He knows how many of his viewers treat him like a leader or a father figure. He knows unstable people latch onto repeated cues. So when he repeats someone’s security setup like a GPS readout he isn’t “just talking.” He is broadcasting a weak point to an audience that contains a non-zero number of obsessives conspiracy addicts and lonely guys desperate to impress him. He even framed it as inside information: “You told me you went to her house.” “She has no security.” “She doesn’t care.” “She’s lying.” This gives his words the weight of clarification, not speculation. It makes listeners feel like they’ve learned a secret. That’s how you activate a mob without calling for one. That’s how you dox-by-proxy. That’s how you throw a match without holding it long enough to get blamed for the fire. When someone with Tim’s reach keeps broadcasting security info about a woman he’s feuding with he stops being a commentator. He becomes a liability in a beanie feeding breadcrumbs to the wrong people. Candace Owens has plenty of critics. She’s used to heat. That’s normal for someone in her line of work. But what Tim did is not normal. You don’t repeat someone’s home security setup to millions of people unless you’re trying to make sure the right kind of listener hears it. This wasn’t outrage. It wasn’t debate. It was a signal. And anyone who’s been around internet culture long enough recognizes the tactic when they see it.

Mr. Gerald Wayne

100,494 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten