Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Subpoena records from court cases show that Google and Amazon home devices are listening and recording everything in your home, at all times, and saving it “This has been established now in several court cases where the courts have gotten access to records of sounds within a home, where,...

107,855 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 34

Фото профиля Shadow Politics
Shadow Politics1 год назад

With this much surveillance how do they not know a single name of an Epst*en client?

Фото профиля Watch DOGE
Watch DOGE1 год назад

The courts have indeed confirmed Big Tech’s invasive overreach—Amazon’s Alexa class action (Garner v. Amazon) exposed systematic recording of private conversations without consent, violating Washington’s consumer laws. Judges ruled these devices capture far more than “commands,” storing sensitive dialogues for profit-driven analytics. This isn’t speculation—it’s judicial fact. While D.C. enables this via lax oversight, the real issue is corporate exploitation masquerading as innovation. Taxpayers deserve transparency, not covert surveillance disguised as convenience. Until Congress reins in these privacy abuses, assume every smart device is a compliance risk. Efficiency shouldn’t mean surrendering fundamental rights to Silicon Valley’s data mills. The legal record is clear—see the case details and what’s at stake:

Фото профиля Derrick Evans
Derrick Evans1 год назад

Most people have no clue what that thing is actually doing.

Фото профиля Klay Thompson
Klay Thompson1 год назад

Oh, so those “conspiracy theorists” were right, again…

Фото профиля Chris
Chris1 год назад

You mean when you get ads right after about speaking about it out loud?

Фото профиля iDenville
iDenville1 год назад

MORE than LISTENING !! Your Roomba may be vacuuming up more than you think. High-end models of Roomba, iRobot’s robotic vacuum, collect data as they clean, identifying the locations of your walls and furniture. This helps them avoid crashing into your couch, but it also creates a map of your home that iRobot could share with Amazon, Apple or Google. That prospect stirred some alarm when Reuters quoted iRobot’s chief executive, Colin Angle, saying that a deal could come in the next two years. But iRobot disputed that account, saying in a statement on Tuesday: “We have not formed any plans to sell data.” Reuters issued a correction, saying Mr. Angle was hoping to share the maps free with customer consent, not sell them. The confusion underscored that the frontier of smart home data and privacy can be a sensitive one. In the hands of a company like Amazon, Apple or Google, that data could fuel the growing product category of digital home assistants. “When we think about ‘what is supposed to happen’ when I enter a room, everything depends on the room at a foundational level knowing what is in it,” an iRobot spokesman said in a written response to questions. “In order to ‘do the right thing’ when you say ‘turn on the lights,’ the room must know what lights it has to turn on. Same thing for music, TV, heat, blinds, the stove, coffee machines, fans, gaming consoles, smart picture frames or robot pets.” But the data, if shared, could also be a windfall for marketers, and the implications are easy to imagine. No armchair in your living room? You might see ads for armchairs next time you open Facebook. Did your Roomba detect signs of a baby? Advertisers might target you accordingly.

Фото профиля Thadious Mancil
Thadious Mancil1 год назад

Never have understood why so many people have those things in their home. It’s like cutting your own throat.

Фото профиля J.J.
J.J.1 год назад

We know. The answer is this. Throw out every TV, every phone, every laptop, iPad and guess what? You still have satellites and drones. We are screwed.

Фото профиля (COMMENTARY) SaltyDogMarine
(COMMENTARY) SaltyDogMarine1 год назад

@grok, isn't it illegal for someone to listen to conversations in someone's home without their approval? Wouldn't this violate someone's 4th amendment rights?

Фото профиля Pamela
Pamela1 год назад

That’s why I would never use any of those home devices.

Фото профиля arcflashdanger
arcflashdanger1 год назад

When you look at your email from say, Home Depot, they know you looked at it. I always get a follow up email saying “we saw you looking, just wondering if your still interested”. We are all under surveillance.

Фото профиля Jim the ADHD Petrol Head
Jim the ADHD Petrol Head1 год назад

Smart phones and smart tv's and laptops do the same.

Фото профиля Jerry Oaksmith - Unplug Dad
Jerry Oaksmith - Unplug Dad1 год назад

About a year ago, I asked my lawyer if this was possible and legal. He said yes to both. He added that they can wire tap you live with a court order

Фото профиля Liz
Liz1 год назад

I’m sure there are other things that spy on us, but I got rid of the home devices 10 years ago.

Фото профиля Thomad 🇺🇸
Thomad 🇺🇸1 год назад

Why haven't they been sued for this?

Фото профиля Global Power Watch
Global Power Watch1 год назад

🚨 YOUR SMART SPEAKER IS A WIRETAP: Alexa & Google Devices Are Recording EVERYTHING 🎙️👀 Subpoenaed court records have CONFIRMED it — Google Home and Amazon Alexa are always listening, always recording, and saving audio from inside your home. In domestic abuse cases, courts have pulled recordings directly from these devices — not just wake words, but full conversations. And yes, Google and Amazon handed them over. So let’s stop pretending this is just a “feature.” You didn’t buy a speaker — you installed a surveillance mic in your living room. Still think you have privacy? 🔁 Share if you’ve had enough of Big Tech listening in 🛑 Tell a friend before it’s too late #AlexaSurveillance #GoogleListening #PrivacyIsGone

Фото профиля Gregory Wirtel 🦬
Gregory Wirtel 🦬1 год назад

I pity the poor soul that has to listen in on our conversations.

Фото профиля Lfleezy
Lfleezy1 год назад

@grok is this accurate?

Фото профиля Miss Lady
Miss Lady1 год назад

And this is why I would never get one in my house. I never trusted it period.

Фото профиля Dr_Lurqmor
Dr_Lurqmor1 год назад

Big data is not your friend. People willingly invite Big Brother into thier homes, and are amazed whens it sole purpose is to be used against them. You must understand the data itself is only useful if the Gov wants to spy on you to categorize you for action of some kind , or

Фото профиля Barrett Lake
Barrett Lake1 год назад

I disabled microphones on all computers and I don't use a smart phone. My mother loves her Alexa but unless the deep state loves Karen Carpenter songs, they won't get much out of that.

Фото профиля CaptainTLB60
CaptainTLB601 год назад

People who want any measure of privacy need to make changes to prevent this kind of surveillance. No “Alexa” type devices, never authorize voice recognition, use 2-factor authentication, block unknown contacts, delete emails, etc.

Фото профиля Dan Estes
Dan Estes1 год назад

Our devices constantly listen, watch, and record our words, actions, and keystrokes. The worst part? We consented to this, and few seem to care. Welcome to the surveillance state.

Фото профиля American Boomer
American Boomer1 год назад

I refuse to have those devices in my home!

Фото профиля James
James1 год назад

When is the class action lawsuit?

Фото профиля Chris
Chris1 год назад

@big_me_t

Фото профиля Wesley Caspers
Wesley Caspers1 год назад

Alexa spies on us. Our phones and apps spy on us. Our laptops spy on us. Our TVs spy on us. Our cars are rolling spyware devices. Even our appiances spy on us and sell the data to third parties who do God knows what with our data. The only way to opt out is not own these things.

Фото профиля Pal Dunc
Pal Dunc1 год назад

They have been saving everything 24/7 records everything just sometime in the near future AI doing the same but with video

Фото профиля pearljohn
pearljohn1 год назад

Even billboards, when you drive by one it will get your cellphone url and you will see their ads the first time you open your Facebook or social media.

Фото профиля Elisa
Elisa1 год назад

Does this include cell phones and smart TV’s or just the AI voice assistants?

Фото профиля TeresaP✝️🇺🇸🙏🏻
TeresaP✝️🇺🇸🙏🏻1 год назад

👀 So, Time to get rid of this crap in your homes!!

Фото профиля Watchman Arise
Watchman Arise1 год назад

I occasionally tell all the alphebet agencies and ccp goodbye as I'm hanging up a call. Guess I'll start telling them goodnight and I love you. 🙄🤪🤣

Фото профиля Elkslayer, Pilgrim Whisperer
Elkslayer, Pilgrim Whisperer1 год назад

Alexa, please spy on me even when you are turned off.

Фото профиля Spamnesia
Spamnesia1 год назад

A friend and I talk about obscure vegetables when we catch up then see who gets the recipe in their social media first.

Похожие видео

NIGERIANS, THIS TINUBU CHICAGO CASE JUST TOOK A NEW TURN. 👀 Take your mind off the FBI filing for a moment. Focus on this VIDEO evidence. What makes this video particularly interesting is who is speaking. Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C. has just released another update on the Tinubu Chicago case. But unlike everything we’ve seen so far… This one isn’t a court document - it’s a video. Recorded at an APC political event in Nigeria. With President Tinubu present. And in that video, a man identified as Adewale Tinubu - reportedly President Tinubu’s nephew - publicly discusses the Chicago case. Now listen carefully to what he says. He reportedly states: “I did that case in Chicago. It was one of my first legal matters.” He then describes personally urging President Tinubu to settle the case. Interesting, right? But here is where things get VERY interesting. The official court record for that Chicago case identifies Patrick S. Coffey, Esq. as the attorney representing Tinubu. Not Adewale Tinubu. There is no court appearance under Adewale Tinubu’s name. No pleading bearing his name. No signature. No filing identifying him as counsel. At least, not in the official court record identified in this filing. So we have a very simple question: Why does a man publicly describe himself as having “done” the Chicago case when the official court record does not identify him as Tinubu’s attorney in that proceeding? There may be an explanation. Perhaps he was involved in some capacity that did not require appearing as counsel of record. Perhaps “I did that case” was being used loosely. Or perhaps there is something else we don’t yet know. That is precisely why this needs to be clarified. And this matters because of what is happening in the FBI FOIA case. Remember the last post I made on this case? Von Batten argued that Tinubu’s privacy position is weakened by the fact that the Nigerian Presidency itself publicly discussed the FBI records and the court case. Now there is another piece of public material. A VIDEO. At an APC political event. With Tinubu present. And his own reported nephew publicly discussing the Chicago case. So the question of privacy becomes even more interesting. Tinubu is asking a US federal court to protect records as private. Yet people within his own political and family circle are publicly discussing matters connected to the case. Can you claim something is private in court while people close to you are publicly discussing it? That is now an issue the court can potentially consider. And Von Batten is not simply posting the video on social media. He is seeking to put the video transcript before the court as part of his supplemental evidentiary exhibits. If the court accepts the filing, the judge will have before her: ➡️ The FBI’s confirmation of 399 pages of responsive records ➡️ Investigative material involving surveillance, undercover operations, cooperating witnesses and other matters ➡️ Wiretap recordings the FBI says were compiled during an investigation involving heroin-trafficking crimes ➡️ Von Batten’s argument concerning the Nigerian Presidency’s public statement ➡️ And now, a video in which Tinubu’s reported nephew publicly discusses the Chicago case Think about that. This case has moved from: “What does the FBI have?” to: “What does the FBI have - and what have people connected to Tinubu publicly said about it?” And there is one question I really want answered: If Adewale Tinubu was involved in that Chicago case, in what capacity was he involved? Because the official court record identified in the filing does not show him as counsel of record. That discrepancy deserves an explanation. And if the video is being presented to a US federal court as evidence, the court can decide what weight, if any, to give it. We don’t need to speculate. We need to look at the documents. Watch the video. Read the transcript. Check the court record. And ask the questions. We deserve the truth.

Oluwakemi Oyefeso

74,252 просмотров • 20 дней назад