Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Successful disclosure depends on excellent science as much as government transparency. Take research on a 1977 event in Council Bluffs, Iowa, when witnesses to a UAP observed a red mass falling from the sky and then found a pool of molten metal on the ground, still boiling twenty minutes...

23,048 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I was asked and responded on Twitter and wanted to made sure everybody is aware of this. A lot happened with all the information from the 2013 Citizen Hearings on UFO Disclosure (produced by the unsung hero, ). We would certainly NOT be where we are today with the UAP transparency topic if it weren’t for what was accomplished in 2013. A singular example is full Veteran medical benefits for a heart surgery needed - physical damage caused by "close proximity to a UAP". The government not only finally admitted (in an unprecedented moment) to knowledge of the physical damage caused by the UAP to a serviceman; but It was acknowledged that John Burroughs was indeed present at the time of the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident - and that was physically damaged by that encounter. The issue was they were covering up the damage caused by the UAP encounter by classifying his medical records and even his presence at the UAP encounter site. So thanks to Congressional pressure from the Citizen Hearing on UFO Disclosure - via the direct participation of Senator John McCain and others - they did the right thing in a historic move! The unclassified his medical records and provided him medial care. John got the life-saving surgery that he needed! That’s just ONE concrete example of what was achieved because of the Citizen Hearing on UFO Disclosure. There are SO MANY MORE examples. We must learn our history to know where we are going with UAP transparency. Here is a brief clip I filmed that talks about this…

Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell

78,691 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Holy smokes. 🤯 Dr. Steven Koonin, respected physicist and former Obama-era science advisor, obliterated Texas A&M’s Dr. Andrew Dessler at a panel hosted by the Civitas Institute covering the findings of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) climate report published last July. During the Q&A session, Koonin noted that climate models, on average, produce about twice as much warming as observations show (which is a fact when models are tested against independent data that they are not artificially tuned to—that is, fudged to agree with). Koonin went on to say that the scientific community has done a disservice to the public by misleading the masses with exaggerated claims. He argued that this has stunted economic growth in parts of the world and has raised energy prices. Dessler’s response? “Yeah, no, I mean, that’s buIIshit.” Koonin snapped back and told him that he shouldn’t use that kind of language in that setting, especially as a tenured professor at a major university. Dessler replied, “I’m sorry, but it is what it is.” He then spends the next minute tripping over his words trying to spin the DOE report as “misleading,” and its authors as committing “scientific felonies” by not going through “peer-review,” and by omitting information. Koonin, being witty, replied stating that Dessler himself omitted the fact that the quality of life has only improved as the planet as gotten warmer, and that it will continue to do so in the future. * eeemotional damage * Though a federal judge recently ruled that the report was assembled and carried out illegally (a pure political move), the science could still stand and be used to rollback regulations.

Chris Martz

54,015 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten