Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

41,214 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I have been a Democrat my entire life. I live in Los Angeles. I was an actress for years. I voted for Obama, then Clinton. I couldn’t wait to vote against the ban on gay marriage. I supported Planned Parenthood. I called JK Rowling “TERF.” I read books like THE NEW JIM CROW in an attempt to “educate” myself. I was a Democrat through-and-through, and more than that—I was even onboard with wokeism, with equity (as opposed to equality), with intersectional feminism, etc. These people had me pretty much hook, line, and sinker. Then in Summer 2020 I was encouraged to go out and engage in “firey but mostly peaceful protests” but was told it was still unsafe for me to go to work. That didn’t make sense. Nothing around me made any sense whatsoever. And I really needed to go back to work. Whenever I brought this up, I was told I was being selfish or even “racist.” Indeed, whenever I saw talk—whether online or on corporate news—of those who took issue with lockdowns, it was always framed as an issue of selfishness, even of racism. For some reason, liberal folks had this idea that anyone remotely concerned over lockdowns was a wealthy white woman who was just bored and wanted to get her hair and nails done. I felt like screaming at everyone, “who do you think does hair and nails?” Hairdressers and nail artists, whose jobs are ESSENTIAL TO THEM. Everyone is an “essential worker” to himself and the people who may depend upon him. What bothered me the most wasn’t that these people disagreed with me, or that they had different ideas on how best to handle covid or BLM unrest—what bothered me the most was that they absolutely refused to recognize I might have any honest reasons for disagreeing with them. And I had honest reasons for disagreeing with them. I and MANY others were being harmed by the tyrannical, overreaching, nonsensical response to covid—especially in blue cities and states. That felt like a punch to the gut, from the people I’d supported and aligned with all my life. So I walked away from the Democrat party. They’ve proven me correct every damn day since then. #walkaway

Natalie Jean Beisner

6,403,312 views • 3 years ago

Recently tried making AI videos locally for the first time using MiniMax H3 + ComfyUI, and I went through three different approaches: text-to-video, syncing to music beats, and image-to-video. 🎬 As an AI video newbie, my biggest takeaway is that the workflow itself isn't nearly as overwhelming as I thought - the real challenge is writing the prompts. Luckily, we can just use AI to solve that! ---- I’d drop my raw ideas straight to the AI, then run them through the official H3 Prompt Writing Skill to turn those thoughts into structured prompts. For example, with my first summer travel video, I broke it down into four scenes. I kept a similar structure across each scene and just swapped out the location details, running it iteratively and tweaking as I went until the output actually matched what was in my head. Thank goodness it's a local model-I could experiment endlessly without blowing through cash just to bridge the gap between "what I wanted" and "what the model understood." The absolute best surprise was that the whole process didn't take long at all. This model is insanely obedient and respects instructions really well, so I barely had to deal with gacha-style rerolls to get the exact shot I wanted. For the music beat-sync video, I wanted the visuals to shift on every kick drum or snare. The final result pretty much hit the nail on the head. Honestly, instead of just generating a video that looks "pretty good," I care way more about whether the model actually gets the rhythm and executes the pacing I set. And this time, it totally delivered. 🥁 Then for the seaside clip, there was a ton of scene description and creative direction, plus a 4-shot storyline-and the model managed to generate the visuals, the vibe, and the background audio all in one single pass. Genuinely blew me away. 🌊 Plus, it’s super beginner-friendly. You can just plug and play with the official workflow templates; literally all I had to think about was writing the prompts, choosing the resolution, and setting the duration. ------- Oh, quick side note on my local PC setup: * GPU: Consumer-grade RTX 4090 24GB * 20 steps for a 15-second video takes about 200+ seconds * Cranking it up to 768P brings it to 1,000+ seconds * Upscaling it to 2K using the official API takes around 6–8 minutes The speed is honestly pretty decent. I heard a bunch of speedup LoRAs came out recently that I haven't gotten around to testing yet, but those should make it run even faster! (Gotta love the power of open source.) ------- I’ll be packaging up all the workflows, scripts, and assets I used for this run and dropping them on GitHub for free!

広志

42,361 views • 23 days ago

“In contravention to Judge Krupp’s preservation order, DA Morrissey’s Office gave the go ahead to Brian Albert and Brian Higgins to destroy or dispose of their phones.” ——Attorney David Yannetti, per the federal investigation Judge Krupp’s preservation order was issued back before the Fall of 2022, before #KarenRead’s case was transferred to Norfolk Superior Court. Preservation requests were subsequently re-examined and court orders reissued by judge Beverly Cannone upon Read’s June 2022 indictment and transfer to Superior Court. Presumably this means that the federal evidence shows that DA Michael Morrissey gave “witnesses” Brian Albert and Brian Higgins the go ahead to destroy evidence—their phones, back before Karen’s case moved over to superior court and judge Beverly Cannone ruled on the previously court-ordered preservation requests. Likely sometime in the Summer/Fall of 2022. This would also align with the fact that the Commonwealth refused to turn over the original Canton Police Department report to Karen Read’s defense counsel until October of 2022—over 8 months after she was arrested, at which point they’d surreptitiously altered the report in an effort to make Karen look more guilty. Notably, however, they also changed Brian Albert and Brian Higgins’ phone numbers on this altered report. This suggests that the timeframe when DA Michael Morrissey presumably gave both Brians the go ahead to destroy/dispose of their phones was sometime before October 2022, when this now altered version of the CPD report was finally produced to the defense. Why does this matter? On August 25, 2023, DA Morrissey put out a video statement personally vouching for the credibility of these same witnesses—Brian Albert and Brian Higgins. This is incredibly problematic for DA Morrissey. The mere fact that he apparently told “witnesses” they could destroy their phones is hard to overcome. How can DA Morrissey feign ignorance of the conspiracy to coverup Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder after he himself gave “witnesses” permission to destroy their phones, or evidence? This fact alone makes him COMPLICIT. But beyond complicity, the fact that Morrissey then went on to make his exceedingly problematic video statement in August 2023 where he personally vouched for the credibility of these same “witnesses” thereby makes him a co-conspirator in the coverup of Officer O’Keefe’s murder AND in the framing of innocent woman Karen Read. What possible explanation could he offer for such actions and conduct? There’s no innocent explanation. His video statement, removed of this backstory, was already outrageous and arguably violative of Rules 3.6 and 3.8 of Professional Conduct in addition to being violative of Karen Read’s constitutional rights. Additionally, this video statement appeared to be an active effort to taint the jury pool. Why else would he send it out to every possible news and media outlet? This fact, and this fact alone, from the evidence produced by the federal investigation, completely sinks this prosecution, and in fact, seems to suggest that DA Michael Morrissey actually knows who the REAL culprits in Officer O’Keefe’s murder are. His own “witnesses”! Why on earth else would he instruct them to destroy their phones, especially after the court ordered them to be preserved? THIS, consciousness of guilt evidence, is used by prosecutors, including by DA Michael Morrissey’s Office, all the time as incriminating evidence in criminal prosecutions. What does it say about DA Morrissey’s consciousness of guilt? At the very least it seems to expose his awareness of his office pursuing a wrongful prosecution. At worst it seems to show that he himself was/is complicit in the coverup. This is really damning evidence. How does DA Michael Morrissey’s Office overcome this? Seems like the final nail in their coffin. #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

83,541 views • 2 years ago