Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

SUPREME COURT’S BRAZEN BETRAYAL Bloodless Voter Genocide Unleashed in Bengal! 🔥 Parakala Prabhakar has called Bengal's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) a “Bloodless Political Genocide” — and He’s RIGHT. 27 LAKH Voters — Mostly Muslims and Scheduled Tribes in TMC strongholds like Murshidabad and 24 Parganas — have been Struck...

tanmoyofc's profile picture

তন্ময় l T͞anmoy l

32,265 subscribers

11,217 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Kolkata, West Bengal: TMC Rajya Sabha MP Babul Supriyo says, "It's not a holding centre, it's a detention centre. They have changed the name...Election Commissioner, later became Chief Secretary. I don't know if that deal was done earlier or not...27 lakh voters, who did not get voting rights. The term illogical discrepancy, which was brought out by them. The Supreme Court also questioned why this had to be done in Bengal. 27 lakh voters could not vote this time. The Supreme Court judge has said that if you cannot vote this time, it does not mean that you will not be able to vote next time. This has also been said..."
1:51

Kolkata, West Bengal: TMC Rajya Sabha MP Babul Supriyo says, "It's not a holding centre, it's a detention centre. They have changed the name...Election Commissioner, later became Chief Secretary. I don't know if that deal was done earlier or not...27 lakh voters, who did not get voting rights. The term illogical discrepancy, which was brought out by them. The Supreme Court also questioned why this had to be done in Bengal. 27 lakh voters could not vote this time. The Supreme Court judge has said that if you cannot vote this time, it does not mean that you will not be able to vote next time. This has also been said..."

IANS

11,612 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

VIDEO | Activist and psephologist Yogendra Yadav, who was a litigant in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) case before the Supreme Court, said, "As one of the litigants, I have reasons to be disappointed, but I am shocked. Not shocked only because I was litigant and the judgment did not go in my favor. That can happen. Not shocked because I had expected a very different judgment. For the last few months, the course, the very strange course that this particular case had taken, made it absolutely clear which way things were going. I'm shocked that the Supreme Court of this country has allowed the fundamental democratic principle to be overturned. In a democracy, voters choose the government. The government cannot choose the voters. And the net effect of what the Supreme Court has done today is that now BJP shall decide who can be a voter in this country and who cannot. Technically, you might say Election Commission will decide. But because the same Supreme Court has done absolutely nothing to ensure that the Election Commission's own appointment is a non-partisan way, and given the manner in which the Election Commission behaves these days, it is absolutely true that now BJP decides who will be the voter, and on the basis of their votes, BJP will say, "We have one popular mandate." This is a complete overturning of the fundamental principle of universal adult franchise...I'm astonished that the Supreme Court of India has put its seal of approval on fundamental overturning of democratic principles."
3:26

VIDEO | Activist and psephologist Yogendra Yadav, who was a litigant in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) case before the Supreme Court, said, "As one of the litigants, I have reasons to be disappointed, but I am shocked. Not shocked only because I was litigant and the judgment did not go in my favor. That can happen. Not shocked because I had expected a very different judgment. For the last few months, the course, the very strange course that this particular case had taken, made it absolutely clear which way things were going. I'm shocked that the Supreme Court of this country has allowed the fundamental democratic principle to be overturned. In a democracy, voters choose the government. The government cannot choose the voters. And the net effect of what the Supreme Court has done today is that now BJP shall decide who can be a voter in this country and who cannot. Technically, you might say Election Commission will decide. But because the same Supreme Court has done absolutely nothing to ensure that the Election Commission's own appointment is a non-partisan way, and given the manner in which the Election Commission behaves these days, it is absolutely true that now BJP decides who will be the voter, and on the basis of their votes, BJP will say, "We have one popular mandate." This is a complete overturning of the fundamental principle of universal adult franchise...I'm astonished that the Supreme Court of India has put its seal of approval on fundamental overturning of democratic principles."

Press Trust of India

75,134 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar says, "The machine-readable voter list is prohibited. This decision of the Election Commission is after the judgment of the Supreme Court and is from 2019." "We have to understand the difference between a machine-readable voter list and a searchable voter list. You can search the voter list available on the Election Commission website by entering the EPIC number. You can also download it. This is not called machine-readable. Regarding machine-readable, in 2019, the Supreme Court also studied this subject in depth and found that giving a machine-readable electoral roll can violate the privacy of the voter... The machine-readable voter list is prohibited. This decision of the Election Commission is after the judgment of the Supreme Court and is from 2019..."
1:37

#WATCH | Delhi: Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar says, "The machine-readable voter list is prohibited. This decision of the Election Commission is after the judgment of the Supreme Court and is from 2019." "We have to understand the difference between a machine-readable voter list and a searchable voter list. You can search the voter list available on the Election Commission website by entering the EPIC number. You can also download it. This is not called machine-readable. Regarding machine-readable, in 2019, the Supreme Court also studied this subject in depth and found that giving a machine-readable electoral roll can violate the privacy of the voter... The machine-readable voter list is prohibited. This decision of the Election Commission is after the judgment of the Supreme Court and is from 2019..."

ANI

281,884 просмотров • 1 год назад

Purification of voter list is not a new phenomenon, it has been going on since Cong times when TN Sheshan was CEC. In Assam, 2 lakh people are marked as D voters, who are not allowed to vote; in the SIR too both Hindus and Muslims have their names held up. News18
1:55

Purification of voter list is not a new phenomenon, it has been going on since Cong times when TN Sheshan was CEC. In Assam, 2 lakh people are marked as D voters, who are not allowed to vote; in the SIR too both Hindus and Muslims have their names held up. News18

Himanta Biswa Sarma

30,947 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Supreme Court has ripped the mask off Mamata Banerjee’s Bengal: this is no democracy, this is political thuggery with state protection. Seven judicial officers were gheraoed for hours in Malda during voter-roll revision work; the officers’ vehicles were attacked with stone-pelting and sticks. The Supreme Court has now called it what it is: a “brazen attempt” to browbeat judges, a “calculated” and “well-planned” move to demoralise them, and proof of the “complete failure” of Bengal’s civil and police administration. CJI Surya Kant’s remark cut to the bone: “In your state, each one of you speaks political language… We have never seen such a polarised state.” That is not just a judicial rebuke. It is an X-ray of Mamata Banerjee’s Bengal, where everything is politicised, institutions are pressured, and even judges cannot do election-related duty without the street being weaponised against them. The Supreme Court has not treated this as some random local flare-up either. It has ordered central-force protection for judicial officers, directed the Election Commission to get the incident probed by an independent agency such as the CBI or NIA with a preliminary report directly to the Court, sought explanations from top state officials, and tightened access at hearing sites so mobs cannot overwhelm the process again. Why is all this happening in Bengal? Because TMC knows 2026 is not unfolding on the old script. Once a ruling party starts sensing slippage, voter-list scrutiny becomes dangerous to its ecosystem, officials become targets, and street intimidation becomes a substitute for political confidence. This is not governance. This is pre-election desperation. That is why the Supreme Court’s words matter so much. The Court has effectively said this was not a spontaneous outburst but a calculated assault on the electoral process and on judicial authority itself. This is the real state of Mamata’s West Bengal: when defeat looms, law and order becomes negotiable, institutions are left exposed, and the street is used as political muscle. The Supreme Court has now seen through it. The country should too. And of course, the state of West Bengal.
2:23

The Supreme Court has ripped the mask off Mamata Banerjee’s Bengal: this is no democracy, this is political thuggery with state protection. Seven judicial officers were gheraoed for hours in Malda during voter-roll revision work; the officers’ vehicles were attacked with stone-pelting and sticks. The Supreme Court has now called it what it is: a “brazen attempt” to browbeat judges, a “calculated” and “well-planned” move to demoralise them, and proof of the “complete failure” of Bengal’s civil and police administration. CJI Surya Kant’s remark cut to the bone: “In your state, each one of you speaks political language… We have never seen such a polarised state.” That is not just a judicial rebuke. It is an X-ray of Mamata Banerjee’s Bengal, where everything is politicised, institutions are pressured, and even judges cannot do election-related duty without the street being weaponised against them. The Supreme Court has not treated this as some random local flare-up either. It has ordered central-force protection for judicial officers, directed the Election Commission to get the incident probed by an independent agency such as the CBI or NIA with a preliminary report directly to the Court, sought explanations from top state officials, and tightened access at hearing sites so mobs cannot overwhelm the process again. Why is all this happening in Bengal? Because TMC knows 2026 is not unfolding on the old script. Once a ruling party starts sensing slippage, voter-list scrutiny becomes dangerous to its ecosystem, officials become targets, and street intimidation becomes a substitute for political confidence. This is not governance. This is pre-election desperation. That is why the Supreme Court’s words matter so much. The Court has effectively said this was not a spontaneous outburst but a calculated assault on the electoral process and on judicial authority itself. This is the real state of Mamata’s West Bengal: when defeat looms, law and order becomes negotiable, institutions are left exposed, and the street is used as political muscle. The Supreme Court has now seen through it. The country should too. And of course, the state of West Bengal.

Mahesh Jethmalani

192,940 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the result of the Assembly elections, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut says, "I believe this is not a victory for democracy. It is definitely a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah. Just like in West Bengal and other states, the names of millions of voters were deleted through SIR, and they did not get the right to vote. There is a difference of 11 lakh votes between victory and defeat. If 9 lakh votes are cut, how can it be a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah?... I have seen this type of election in Pakistan, Russia, and Azerbaijan. This type of election is not even an election. The results are fixed first, and then the elections are held..."
2:13

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the result of the Assembly elections, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut says, "I believe this is not a victory for democracy. It is definitely a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah. Just like in West Bengal and other states, the names of millions of voters were deleted through SIR, and they did not get the right to vote. There is a difference of 11 lakh votes between victory and defeat. If 9 lakh votes are cut, how can it be a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah?... I have seen this type of election in Pakistan, Russia, and Azerbaijan. This type of election is not even an election. The results are fixed first, and then the elections are held..."

ANI

11,436 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

57 lakh women voters wiped off Bengal’s rolls between 2024 and 2026, through a rigged process shaped by Election Commission of India and the same Delhi “zamindars” who have always been uncomfortable with women who think, speak, and decide for themselves. This is BJP's SIR. 3.73 crore women voters in 2024, gutted to 3.16 crore in 2026. The voter gender ratio has hit a 14-year low, the first fall since 2012, engineered in an election year by a party that knows it cannot survive Bengal's women voting freely. BJP knows exactly who Bengal's women stand with. Not Delhi. Not their imported agenda. Not their zamindari politics that treats Bengal like a colony to be managed. Bengal's women stand with Maa, Mati, Manush, and BJP has always known it. So they built a trap. Maiden names, marriage record gaps, “Logical discrepancies." A verification process designed to fail women, not protect them. Nari-birodhi in their words. Nari-birodhi in their actions. Smt. Mamata Banerjee called it out today. To every woman whose name they tried to erase, don’t forget this. Don’t let it go. This was not a mistake, this was an attempt to silence you. But don’t worry, Didi is with you. Jotoi Koro Hamla #AbarJitbeBangla
0:37

57 lakh women voters wiped off Bengal’s rolls between 2024 and 2026, through a rigged process shaped by Election Commission of India and the same Delhi “zamindars” who have always been uncomfortable with women who think, speak, and decide for themselves. This is BJP's SIR. 3.73 crore women voters in 2024, gutted to 3.16 crore in 2026. The voter gender ratio has hit a 14-year low, the first fall since 2012, engineered in an election year by a party that knows it cannot survive Bengal's women voting freely. BJP knows exactly who Bengal's women stand with. Not Delhi. Not their imported agenda. Not their zamindari politics that treats Bengal like a colony to be managed. Bengal's women stand with Maa, Mati, Manush, and BJP has always known it. So they built a trap. Maiden names, marriage record gaps, “Logical discrepancies." A verification process designed to fail women, not protect them. Nari-birodhi in their words. Nari-birodhi in their actions. Smt. Mamata Banerjee called it out today. To every woman whose name they tried to erase, don’t forget this. Don’t let it go. This was not a mistake, this was an attempt to silence you. But don’t worry, Didi is with you. Jotoi Koro Hamla #AbarJitbeBangla

All India Trinamool Congress

21,829 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

19% of all registered voters in Chester County, Pennsylvania are not able to vote “Anyone who is a registered independent or third-party voter in the county and showed up to the polls this morning was told their name is not on the voter roll. It is a countywide issue” “Voters just ended up walking away. Chester County Voter Services says it is going to conduct a formal review to figure out how this happened and how to prevent it from happening again. But that does not seem to be easing the frustration and mistrust that a lot of voters are feeling today. There are more than 75,000 registered independents and third-party voters in Chester County. That's about 19% of all registered voters” The ones who don’t walk away were only allowed to cast provisional ballots A provisional ballot is a backup ballot used when there’s a question about a voter’s eligibility or registration at the time they show up to vote. It’s set aside and only counted after election officials verify the voter was actually allowed to vote. (Perfect for fraud)
1:05

19% of all registered voters in Chester County, Pennsylvania are not able to vote “Anyone who is a registered independent or third-party voter in the county and showed up to the polls this morning was told their name is not on the voter roll. It is a countywide issue” “Voters just ended up walking away. Chester County Voter Services says it is going to conduct a formal review to figure out how this happened and how to prevent it from happening again. But that does not seem to be easing the frustration and mistrust that a lot of voters are feeling today. There are more than 75,000 registered independents and third-party voters in Chester County. That's about 19% of all registered voters” The ones who don’t walk away were only allowed to cast provisional ballots A provisional ballot is a backup ballot used when there’s a question about a voter’s eligibility or registration at the time they show up to vote. It’s set aside and only counted after election officials verify the voter was actually allowed to vote. (Perfect for fraud)

Wall Street Apes

51,108 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Free and fair elections in Bengal? Secret algorithm and mass deletions through SIR 27 lakh voters could not exercise their right to vote in the West Bengal elections because of a secret algorithm deployed by the Election Commission of India. Was it a "logical discrepancy" or a “targeted purge” through the SIR? Watch our discussion with Yogendra Yadav on Jaanne Bhi Do Yaaro
2:00

Free and fair elections in Bengal? Secret algorithm and mass deletions through SIR 27 lakh voters could not exercise their right to vote in the West Bengal elections because of a secret algorithm deployed by the Election Commission of India. Was it a "logical discrepancy" or a “targeted purge” through the SIR? Watch our discussion with Yogendra Yadav on Jaanne Bhi Do Yaaro

Anjali Bhardwaj

19,393 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Do not think we are fighting a fair fight. If you believe we are fighting against a political organization called BJP and RSS, they have captured almost every institution in our country. We are now fighting not just the BJP and RSS, but the Indian state itself. I clearly stated that something went wrong in the Maharashtra elections. We are uncomfortable with the way the Election Commission operates. The sudden appearance of almost one crore new voters between the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections in Maharashtra is problematic. It is the Election Commission's duty to provide a voters' list with names and addresses of those who voted in the Vidhan Sabha election. However, the Election Commission has refused to provide this information. Why would the Election Commission refuse to make the voters' list transparent? What purpose does it serve by not providing us with the list, and why are they withholding it? It is the Election Commission's duty to provide transparency, and it is their sacred responsibility to explain why this has happened. This is something that every congressman and every opposition member must keep in mind. There is a serious problem with our election system, and it is the Election Commission's duty to be transparent. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍 New Delhi
5:17

Do not think we are fighting a fair fight. If you believe we are fighting against a political organization called BJP and RSS, they have captured almost every institution in our country. We are now fighting not just the BJP and RSS, but the Indian state itself. I clearly stated that something went wrong in the Maharashtra elections. We are uncomfortable with the way the Election Commission operates. The sudden appearance of almost one crore new voters between the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections in Maharashtra is problematic. It is the Election Commission's duty to provide a voters' list with names and addresses of those who voted in the Vidhan Sabha election. However, the Election Commission has refused to provide this information. Why would the Election Commission refuse to make the voters' list transparent? What purpose does it serve by not providing us with the list, and why are they withholding it? It is the Election Commission's duty to provide transparency, and it is their sacred responsibility to explain why this has happened. This is something that every congressman and every opposition member must keep in mind. There is a serious problem with our election system, and it is the Election Commission's duty to be transparent. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍 New Delhi

Congress

170,221 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Hyderabad: On the Opposition parties' joint letter to the CJI on the SIR process of the ECI and other election-related issues, BJP State President N Ramchander Rao says, “Congress is trying to drag the constitutional and statutory bodies like the Supreme Court and the Election Commission of India into political controversies. The representation to the CJI by some political parties is unwarranted and not in good taste in democracy…it is surprising that the political parties are seeking the intervention of the Supreme Court without any application and only as a representation and a political demand…the democratic society will not appreciate such an attempt…”
1:23

#WATCH | Hyderabad: On the Opposition parties' joint letter to the CJI on the SIR process of the ECI and other election-related issues, BJP State President N Ramchander Rao says, “Congress is trying to drag the constitutional and statutory bodies like the Supreme Court and the Election Commission of India into political controversies. The representation to the CJI by some political parties is unwarranted and not in good taste in democracy…it is surprising that the political parties are seeking the intervention of the Supreme Court without any application and only as a representation and a political demand…the democratic society will not appreciate such an attempt…”

ANI

31,976 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court clarifies: Right to Vote & Right to Contest in elections are NOT Fundamental Rights. They are purely statutory rights and exist only to the extent provided by law. This is a big legal clarification. Even if some genuine voters are left out during SIR (Special Intensive Revision), it is not a constitutional violation. They can enrol again next time. A strong slap to the opposition’s narrative that deleting suspicious names is a "gross violation of the Constitution." Rule of law over politics. 🔥🇮🇳
0:23

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court clarifies: Right to Vote & Right to Contest in elections are NOT Fundamental Rights. They are purely statutory rights and exist only to the extent provided by law. This is a big legal clarification. Even if some genuine voters are left out during SIR (Special Intensive Revision), it is not a constitutional violation. They can enrol again next time. A strong slap to the opposition’s narrative that deleting suspicious names is a "gross violation of the Constitution." Rule of law over politics. 🔥🇮🇳

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

78,690 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Green Party co-leader Elizabeth May has a message for all Canadians: "It's going to be an election that matters like never before. Voter turnout in this country has been declining. This time, it's your patriotic duty to vote. Every single Canadian eighteen years and older get out and vote. Eighteen years and older, get out and run! This is an election where, as Jonathan has said, vote like your country depends on it. Vote like your planet depends on it. Vote like your future depends on it. Let's have the highest voter turnout in the history of Canada. Take that, Trump!" #TeamCanada #cdnpoli #Elxn45
2:15

Green Party co-leader Elizabeth May has a message for all Canadians: "It's going to be an election that matters like never before. Voter turnout in this country has been declining. This time, it's your patriotic duty to vote. Every single Canadian eighteen years and older get out and vote. Eighteen years and older, get out and run! This is an election where, as Jonathan has said, vote like your country depends on it. Vote like your planet depends on it. Vote like your future depends on it. Let's have the highest voter turnout in the history of Canada. Take that, Trump!" #TeamCanada #cdnpoli #Elxn45

Jason Pugh 🇨🇦 🏳️‍🌈

81,188 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Murshidabad, West Bengal: On TMC goes to Supreme Court over EC's counting supervisor move, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury says, "Anyone can go to the Supreme Court, but it does not behove the ruling party TMC in Bengal to talk about religion from their mouths. In Bengal, from panchayat elections to municipal elections and others, people are not even allowed to file nominations. The police and TMC goons work together to block the paths for opposition members to participate in elections. If someone wins, they are not even given a certificate... This time, I saw that ordinary people were able to vote in the presence of central forces during the elections, they were able to participate in the elections without fear. That does not mean that I support the BJP or the Election Commission... SIR is a different issue, but people voted without fear in the elections because of the presence and proactiveness of the central forces."
2:20

#WATCH | Murshidabad, West Bengal: On TMC goes to Supreme Court over EC's counting supervisor move, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury says, "Anyone can go to the Supreme Court, but it does not behove the ruling party TMC in Bengal to talk about religion from their mouths. In Bengal, from panchayat elections to municipal elections and others, people are not even allowed to file nominations. The police and TMC goons work together to block the paths for opposition members to participate in elections. If someone wins, they are not even given a certificate... This time, I saw that ordinary people were able to vote in the presence of central forces during the elections, they were able to participate in the elections without fear. That does not mean that I support the BJP or the Election Commission... SIR is a different issue, but people voted without fear in the elections because of the presence and proactiveness of the central forces."

ANI

61,703 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ECI'S SECRET VOTER PURGE IN BENGAL EXPOSED 𝟏.𝟑𝟔 𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐁𝐲 𝐀 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 "𝐖𝐚𝐥𝐥" 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐆𝐨𝐭 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝! 🔥 The Election Commission built a digital fortress around West Bengal's Electoral Rolls during the 2025-26 Special Intensive Revision (SIR). They invented a brand-new "Logical Discrepancy" category and slapped 1.36 CRORE voters Statewide with "Under Adjudication" tags — freezing their Voting Rights indefinitely with ZERO Explanation or Deadline. To bury the Truth, ECI released the rolls ONLY as massive scanned PDFs (228x larger than digital files), Blocked Automation with CAPTCHA Gates, Limited Downloads to 10 areas at a Time, and Slapped Diagonal "UNDER ADJUDICATION" Watermarks that Obscure Names on 1 in 10 entries. But Alt News just smashed through the Wall. They digitized 558 PDFs from Mamata Banerjee’s Bhabanipur and neighbouring Ballygunge seats. The Shocking Findings: • 39,604 voters (11.2% of the entire electorate in these two seats) marked “Under Adjudication” •;Muslims = 39.5% of voters… but 66.5% of those flagged • A Muslim voter is 3.1 times more likely than a Hindu voter to lose their right to vote • In Bhabanipur: Muslims (just 21.9% of voters) make up 51.8% of flagged cases — nearly 1 in every 4 Muslims targeted vs fewer than 1 in 17 Hindus This isn’t a Glitch. This is Systematic, Targeted Disenfranchisement ahead of Elections. #ElectionCommission #WestBengal #SupremeCourt
11:05

ECI'S SECRET VOTER PURGE IN BENGAL EXPOSED 𝟏.𝟑𝟔 𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐒𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐁𝐲 𝐀 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 "𝐖𝐚𝐥𝐥" 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐆𝐨𝐭 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝! 🔥 The Election Commission built a digital fortress around West Bengal's Electoral Rolls during the 2025-26 Special Intensive Revision (SIR). They invented a brand-new "Logical Discrepancy" category and slapped 1.36 CRORE voters Statewide with "Under Adjudication" tags — freezing their Voting Rights indefinitely with ZERO Explanation or Deadline. To bury the Truth, ECI released the rolls ONLY as massive scanned PDFs (228x larger than digital files), Blocked Automation with CAPTCHA Gates, Limited Downloads to 10 areas at a Time, and Slapped Diagonal "UNDER ADJUDICATION" Watermarks that Obscure Names on 1 in 10 entries. But Alt News just smashed through the Wall. They digitized 558 PDFs from Mamata Banerjee’s Bhabanipur and neighbouring Ballygunge seats. The Shocking Findings: • 39,604 voters (11.2% of the entire electorate in these two seats) marked “Under Adjudication” •;Muslims = 39.5% of voters… but 66.5% of those flagged • A Muslim voter is 3.1 times more likely than a Hindu voter to lose their right to vote • In Bhabanipur: Muslims (just 21.9% of voters) make up 51.8% of flagged cases — nearly 1 in every 4 Muslims targeted vs fewer than 1 in 17 Hindus This isn’t a Glitch. This is Systematic, Targeted Disenfranchisement ahead of Elections. #ElectionCommission #WestBengal #SupremeCourt

তন্ময় l T͞anmoy l

28,207 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Top Court backs S.I.R process "The question was never whether the voter list should be revised or not. The question was whether the special, controversial, and unprecedented method used for it—one that shifted the burden onto voters, overturned the presumption of citizenship, and required new documents and family history—was legal and constitutional or not. The Supreme Court of India has put its stamp of approval on the biggest disenfranchisement ever in the history of any country."- Yogendra Yadav speaks to Rajdeep Sardesai #SupremeCourt #SIR #ElectionCommission
7:32

Top Court backs S.I.R process "The question was never whether the voter list should be revised or not. The question was whether the special, controversial, and unprecedented method used for it—one that shifted the burden onto voters, overturned the presumption of citizenship, and required new documents and family history—was legal and constitutional or not. The Supreme Court of India has put its stamp of approval on the biggest disenfranchisement ever in the history of any country."- Yogendra Yadav speaks to Rajdeep Sardesai #SupremeCourt #SIR #ElectionCommission

IndiaToday

37,740 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад