Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

surely nobody would know that maomao's recent experiment had a diruetic effect, right? sneak sneak~~~ --- #maomao #apothecarydiaries #nsfwcosplay #cosplaypee #omorashi #wetting #cosplaywetting #gooner #goonette #nsfwtwt #nsfwsky

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A debate over whether or not Trump had to do Operation Warp Speed (Death): "Trump... funded $18 billion of a campaign that has killed and disabled millions and bankrupted millions of Americans." "But he had to do it to pull us out of lockdowns." "You're saying that if everybody else wants to murder millions of Americans, you have to go along?" This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with David Nino Rodriguez (David Nino Rodriguez) posted to Nino's eponymous YouTube channel on February 5, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Rodriguez: "Trump, when he goes to Davos and it looks really like he's delivering shots across the bow, right? He, he looks like he's declaring war on Davos and the world elite. You know, he pulls out of World Health Organization, the CDC, and it really looks like he's making the right moves. "But then again, I look at this digital, this, digital concentration camp that's coming, and I think to myself, are we really going in the right direction? "What's your thoughts on that? What's your thoughts of him pulling out of the World Health Organization? I mean, he's making all the right moves, right?" Fitts: "No, no, no. So he's made some good moves. If you look at the moves that Kennedy has got him to make, those are good moves. But remember, we continue to allow to be given and encourage to children in a way that's killing children. It's killing people all across the country. "I mean, you know, this is where I got into trouble in the election, because Trump had authorized and funded $18 billion of a campaign that has killed and disabled millions and bankrupted millions of Americans." Rodriguez: "But he had to do it to pull us out of lockdowns." Fitts: "No, no, excuse me. He didn't have to do it. Hold on, hold on." Rodriguez: "But my guests would say. I'm going to say what my guests would say, that he had to do that in order to. Operation Warp Speed is what you're talking about. He had to do that in order to take— Because the elites, the globalists had us planned to be in lockdowns till 2026, and nobody could vote unless they got this." Fitts: "They don't have the power to do that." Rodriguez: "Well, they did it... 2020 happened." Fitts: "No, no, no, no, no, you don't— No one, no one had the power to do that unless the U.S. government and the state governments and the military went along—" Rodriguez: "But they were going along. Everyone was taking this, the military was taking this. All the politicians were in bed with these people. Everyone was compromised. I mean, we all saw it." Fitts: "Wait a minute. You're saying that if everybody else wants to murder millions of Americans, you have to go along?" Rodriguez: "No, no, what I'm saying is, what I'm saying is, I don't think there was any proper move he could have made out of that situation. And he had to go with Operation Warp Speed." Fitts: "No, no, no. There is a proper move he could have made. He said he wasn't going to authorize it. Now, could he have gotten impeached?" Rodriguez: "But he had to get the economy moving and get everyone out of lockdowns, correct? And move us forward. Otherwise, we would have stayed in lockdowns until 2026." Fitts: "Nobody has to. I've been a government official. Nobody has to break the law. Nobody has to murder somebody, okay? He put someone in charge of Operation Warp Speed. You know what his expertise was? The guy who ran Operation Warp Speed? ... it was a guy who'd been head of research at one of the big pharmaceutical companies whose expertise was brain–machine interface. So if you talk about the nanoparticles that were in the shots, what does that have to do with the mark of the beast? Probably something."

Sense Receptor

26,966 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 Mamdani Taps Failed DA Candidate Who Ran on 80% Jail Cut, 20-Year Max, and Wants to Use Police Scandals to Shrink NYPD Toward “Abolition” Janos Marton, Chief Advocacy Officer at and a failed Manhattan DA candidate, now sits on Zohran Mamdani’s Committee on Community Safety. Marton suggests controversies are golden opportunities to actually work toward abolishing the police. “If you're actually serious about police reform, I think the answer lies not so much in, you know, sending a couple of bad cops to jail. The answer lies in how do you use that, that incident, the publicity around that moment to shrink the size of the police budget so that there's fewer police officers." "You know, which Which matters not only on the day to day level of what's happening on the street, but from a political purpose, from a political standpoint, you know, the smaller the police department, the smaller the number of retired police officers and their families, the less political influence they have." "I've never seen across the United States a single budget that eliminates police officers, but if you have fewer of them, you're shrinking the system in the right direction towards abolition.” Here in his DA platform: 80% jail cut, near-zero pretrial detention, and a 20-year cap: “I was running on a platform that called on using jail and prison as a last resort, to basically eliminate the use of pretrial detention except for very exceptional circumstances, which is why we called for cutting the jail population by 80% in Manhattan.” “It called for reforming the way we sentence people, the boldest sentencing reform in the United States, a 20-year cap. That, would, you know, basically be the maximum sentence that would bring us in line with other countries. And, you know, in addition to being a cap for the longest sentences that would right-size the rest of the sentencing system that we have.” And Marton wanted to end the "war on drugs." “It called for ending the war on drugs, eliminating the Office of Special Narcotics Prosecutor, which is one of the driving forces behind the war on drugs in New York.” If you can’t win an election, you just sneak your agenda in the back door, as long as the mayor is just as radical.

Stu Smith

21,972 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “Your Director of National Counterterrorism, Joe Kent — he just resigned today. He said he can’t support your conflict with Iran. What’s your reaction to that? And did you —” President Trump: “Well, I read his statement. I always thought it was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security, very weak on security. I didn’t know him well, but I thought he seemed like a pretty nice guy, but when I read a statement, I realized that it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat — every country realized what a threat Iran was. The question is whether or not they wanted to do something about it. And many people, many of the greatest military scholars are saying for years that presidents should have taken out Iran because they wanted a nuclear weapon. They were — if we didn’t do the attack or if I’ll go a step further, if I didn’t terminate the Iran nuclear deal given to us, one of the worst deals ever made by Barack Hussein Obama. Remember when they sent Boeing 757 over there loaded with cash, hundreds of millions of dollars? You would have been very happy. This was a wonderful — they sent hundreds of million — people forget that. Does anybody remember, right? You remember! Hundreds of millions of dollars in a Boeing 757. I think they had two of them loaded. They took the seats out and they put cash. And it was so much that there wasn’t a bank in Virginia, Maryland, or DC that had any money left. They stripped them of all their money, put it into planes, sent it to Iran almost as ransom. That’s not going to happen with Trump. And nobody ever did anything about it. Nobody ever said anything. Can you imagine if I did that? So, they’ve been a threat for a long time, but they’ve really been a threat. If — if I didn’t terminate Obama’s horrible deal that he made, the Iran nuclear deal, you would have had a nuclear war four years ago. You would have had — you would have had nuclear holocaust, and you would have had it again if we didn’t bomb the site. So, when somebody is working with us that says they didn’t think Iran was a threat, we don’t want those people because — and there are some people, I guess, that would say that, but they’re not smart people or they’re not savvy people. Iran was a tremendous threat. And virtually every NATO nation — and this is the thing, if they told me it wasn’t a threat and therefore they don’t want to help, but when they say it was a threat and it was a major threat — every one of them — I think every one of them — I don’t know of one that said they’re not a threat, but when they say it was a threat, but we’re not going to help, I think they’re very foolish. You know, it’s interesting. It’s interesting because I could say this, that what’s happening in Ukraine, we’re probably in there for $400 billion. We don’t spend any money anymore. They buy it from us and they pay full price. But Biden gave them between 350 and $400 billion of equipment and cash. Someday, they’ll have to find out about the cash, and you could say that wasn’t a threat. You know, we’re helping them, so we helped them and they didn’t help us. And I think that’s a very bad thing for NATO.”

Curtis Houck

12,646 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"I'm not sure that we need the dog whistle at this point. And maybe there are ways to re-create it." ~Nolan "There might be a day when Skywatcher doesn't need to exist." ~Nolan "If I had been running the whole show, nobody would even know what Skywatcher is right now." ~Nolan ~My comments in ( )~ Garry P. Nolan: "We've got a lot of data from multiple alleged sightings, both radar and other kinds of data. First it was about getting the raw-data files all put in one place because some of the data was collected by James (Fowler) before there was, officially, kind of a Skywatcher. "And so, getting that data, getting the instrument names that he used for those, then getting the technical manuals of what the settings might be and how much of that information is collected in the metadata when you're collecting the thing... All of this is just the organization that you need to do before you do anything else. "And then, getting from the companies how it is that they parse their raw data. Because some of these data files are put into...I wouldn't call them encrypted, but they're stacked into a certain kind of file structure - and I've seen the file structure - which is, you can think of it as a giant spreadsheet with headings and numbers for each of the columns and time on the row axis. "And so, you know, we've started looking at some of the data and put it into, let's say, 3D tracking. And it's clear that there are some things about the data that we needed to go back to the vendor who makes the instrument and say, 'Why is this and this and this happening, you know, every few dozen milliseconds?'" (I wonder if some of what they saw in their data, and labelled as anomalous, has maybe turned out to be a sensor artifact?) Nolan: "And so, you know, just getting an answer from these companies, often, when you don't even own the instrument, they're like, 'Well, why should we give you the information about how our data is constructed? How do we know that you're not a competitor?' Right? I mean, and so these are the kinds of things that we then contact somebody who has a behind-the-scenes access to this so that we can, again, it's all of these little steps. "And I'm sure there's somebody who's gonna tweet, 'Well, why don't you just put all the raw data out on the internet?' For exactly the same reason you don't put the raw data from ancient DNA sequencing. Because people will make mistakes about it. And so, if I'm going to be involved, I'm not gonna make any mistakes like that. So I'm sorry if people want stuff early. "I think you know, perhaps, if... Well, if I had been running the whole show, nobody would even know what Skywatcher is right now. We'd just be collecting the data in a fully-stealthed mode. And...but, you know, it's...there's reasons, good reasons, why they wanted some publicity. And, you know, but I don't always get my way." Vinnie - 𝐕𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐬 𝕏: "Would you say that the data is exciting?" Nolan: "Oh, there's some interesting stuff in there. I mean, frankly, perhaps some of the better data that we have is just a couple of pictures from the ground of the helicopter with something about, you know, 200 feet in front of it. It's a clear blue sky and there's an object right in front of the helicopter. And the people in the helicopter said at the time that they couldn't see anything, even though we could see it from the ground. "But meanwhile, all of their instruments are going haywire. So, there was an effect. So why couldn't they see it? Maybe it was just out of view? Who knows? So it wasn't a lens flare, and it certainly wasn't a seagull. Mick (both laugh)." Vinnie: "Not in the desert anyway." Nolan: "I can't help myself." Vinnie: "I'm all for it. I'm sure Mick would, too. Hopefully. You know, James Fowler, we know he's left and moved on working with a new company. You know, all the best to him. Am I right in saying some of the technology being utilized by Skywatcher was proprietary to him, specifically? Maybe the dog whistle even? Is that still going to be able to be used by Skywatcher? How's that going to look going forward?" Nolan: "Umm, I'm not sure that we need the dog whistle at this point. And maybe there are ways to recreate it. I'm not party to the discussions around that. And so, we'll see where that goes." (That sounds like Fowler is NOT going to allow Skywatcher to use the dog whistle. That's a big disappointment. I mean, if this is really NHI and the dog whistle works 100% of the time, as claimed, then the whole world deserves to know about it.) Nolan: "I mean, James is not like, gone and forgotten. I mean, I could Signal chat him right now. And so he's there to help us. But, you know, my take on things is, you know, James has a life to live and a family to feed, and maybe his focus isn't entirely on UAP. He certainly has an interest in it. And maybe he has, you know, a company to build, and an opportunity that, actually, we all see now in terms of detecting drones. And, you know, if he wants to run a company like that then running around with a bunch of UAPologists might not be to that benefit. "And there might be a day when Skywatcher doesn't need to exist. The whole idea of Skywatcher is to show that something like this can be done, and it can be done in a serious way." (jakebarber claimed that they could BRING DOWN a craft. If that's true, it would change the world. What happened with that? Barber also said, "Who is operating [UAP]? How are they being operated? Where are they coming from? We should be able to answer those questions, probably entirely, in the next 12 months." Time is running out. Does he still stand behind that? Full Barber post with video clip: ) ~ Nolan: "I mean, I would...I, frankly, hope that if UAPDA - Disclosure Act is passed, because then the information that can be allowed to be out can be let out, and the stuff that needs to be kept secret stays secret. Again, I'm not, I would never advocate for a data dump." (I would 100% advocate for a data dump, minus details on anything that can be used as a weapon. Nobody, including the USG or private contractors owns this information. If it's gonna be a slow drip, for decades, then I fully support an Edward Snowden-type of leaker.) Nolan: "And so, you know, call it controlled disclosure, what have you. It needs to be done the proper way. And, you know, if any of the claims are true, there are reasons why you want to be methodical about it." (Who gets to decide what "the proper way" looks like? It seems like we're having more gatekeeping on top of the original gatekeeping. Not good.)

Joe Murgia

32,437 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

ABC's Jonathan Karl at 445pm Eastern on a phone call he had with President Trump after leaRNing of Charlie Kirk's assassination: “I had a brief conversation with the President over the phone. He sounded quite upset, quite down about this. ‘He told me it's horrific. It's one of the most horrific things I've ever seen. He was a great guy. He was a good man. He was an incredible guy. There's nobody like him.’ Charlie Kirk, as Mary pointed out, was truly a personal confidant of the president, incredibly close to the President's son, Donald Trump Jr. and really, in many ways, the beating heart of the MAGA movement, his Turning point USA organization, not just a campus organization. David, this was an organization that put on some of the largest and most ambitious conventions, rallies, events for Donald Trump around the country with pyrotechnics and huge crowds. Also, one other thing I think that is very important about Charlie Kirk is that is that he was somebody, particularly in recent months, who was making a point to try to engage with those that he disagreed with. Look, he had far right views, some very controversial views, but he sat down not long ago and did a podcast with Gavin Newsom, the governor of California. On — on his college campus tours, he would often give speeches. He would be protested. But then when it was over, when the discussion was over, his part of speaking, he would welcome questions from the crowds, including hostile questions in many cases from college students, and engage in those who found his views deeply problematic and offensive. He wanted to engage in those people, and he did so directly. And in fact, that appears to be what he was doing today in Utah when this horrific event happened.”

Curtis Houck

648,285 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад