Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Suspect thinks 'sue you' magic words... predict what K9 sniffs out before watching 😤 Epic fail or genius? Agree it's comedy gold?

107,147 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

THE ENGLISH LYRICS TO THE SONG 😭🥹🤍 "On a night without stars in the sky. It's just an ordinary, quiet night. The atmosphere around me doesn't help at all. I want to take your hand and hold it tight, to tell you how much I love you. But I've never managed to say it out loud. Because usually, I'm not good with words. You probably know and understand this better than anyone. And the reason I don't say anything sweet or touching like others do. It's because I believe a love song, the one I give to you. Should only be one, just enough. If there are too many, those sweet words might lose their meaning. I want you to know. Let us speak through our eyes, every time we look at each other. Let you feel and know that I'm never far away. The stars in the sky fade because of the city's bright lights. But they've never truly gone anywhere. Because usually, I'm not good with words. You probably know and understand this better than anyone. And the reason I don't say anything sweet or touching like others do, it's because I believe a love song, the one I give to you. Should only be one, just enough. If there are too many, those sweet words might lose their meaning. Just like the word love, if said too often, I'm afraid you won't feel as moved as before. Though I don't say it much, deep in my heart. This person loves you more than anyone. I want you to know. That's the only one love song for you. The song I wrote for you will never lose its meaning. Even if I'm no longer here, or a hundred years pass by, my love will stay with you forever. Because I believe a love song, the one I give to you, should only be one, just enough. If there are too many, those sweet words might lose their meaning. Just like the word love, if said too often. I'm afraid you won't feel as moved as before. Though I don't say it much, deep in my heart. This person loves you more than anyone. I want you to know." #ENGLOTinfinityTourinEUROPE25 #อิงฟ้ามหาชน #EngfaWaraha #ชาล็อตออสติน #CharlotteAustin #อิงล็อต​ #englot

Shlohmo

83,353 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

China's central bank has now bought gold for 19 months straight, the largest official buyer on earth. And this week, as gold broke 4,000 dollars, China's biggest banks moved to push ordinary Chinese out of leveraged gold trading, with at least one warning it will liquidate any position not closed by month-end. Both are true at once, and together they explain what this crash really is. Start with what is being banned, because the words matter. ICBC and a string of other banks are shutting down retail trading in what the Chinese themselves call paper gold, the margined, leveraged contracts where you bet on the price without ever owning a bar. Some banks lifted the margin requirement to 140 percent to choke the leverage off before closing the products outright. Physical gold, meanwhile, stays wide open. Coins, bars, savings plans, ETFs, all fine. It is only the paper, the leverage, the casino, that is being shut, the last step in a five-year retreat that the crash just finished. Officially this is about protecting small investors, and that part is real. The same kind of leverage wiped out a wave of Chinese retail in a 2020 commodity blowup. But set the ban beside what the state is doing and something larger comes into view. While its citizens are pushed out of the paper, the People's Bank of China has spent those same 19 months buying the physical metal, more than two thousand three hundred tonnes of it now, accumulating straight through a 28 percent crash that scared everyone else out. Beijing is not trading gold. It is hoarding it. That is the strategy in one frame. China looked at the two things both called gold, the paper bet and the physical bar, and made a choice no Western government would make. It is taking the metal for the state and closing the casino for everyone else. The reason sits in a single date. 2022, when Russia's reserves were frozen with a keystroke. That taught every country outside the Western system one lesson: dollars in an account can be switched off, gold in your own vault cannot. So China is building its monetary independence out of the one asset nobody can freeze, and it does not want that foundation in the hands of leveraged traders who panic-sell in a crash, or priced by a paper market it does not control. Watch this month and the two worlds split in real time. Western investors were forced out of their gold by margin calls and a rate scare. China's central bank bought that exact dip with both hands. One side treats gold as a trade. The other treats it as the floor under a currency. The West is selling paper gold and calling it a crash. China is buying physical gold and calling it a foundation. In ten years, only one of them will look like it understood what gold was for. The metal is already moving to that side.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

326,185 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Hi Maria Ressa I am addressing this long post to you here on X, knowing it will reach you directly. In a decade from now, you could ask any listener what they remember from your Harvard commencement speech, and the vast majority would only recall these shocking words from your 23-minute address. “Because I accepted your invitation to be here today, I was attacked online and called anti-semitic. By power and money”, Because they want power and money.” Words you carefully selected, reviewed, and edited for months, a speech that you describe was more difficult for you to prepare than your The Nobel Prize acceptance lecture. In the Ethics of The Fathers 1:11, Avtalyon, the great rabbinic sage from Jerusalem, in the 1st century BCE cautioned, "Sages, be careful with your words, lest you incur the penalty of exile, and be carried off to a place of evil waters." Your words hold weight, and it's vital to avoid ambiguity and imprecision, as they can lead people astray. Your Nobel Prize celebrated your defense of free speech and your commitment to combating fake news and misinformation, and speaking truth to power. Your entire career and public role is to amplify the words of King Solomon in Proverbs “Words kill, words give life; they're either poison or fruit—you choose. You are a leading voice in warning of the danger of how conspiratorial words online can lead to physical hate offline. One of the most pernicious outcomes of social media is the record level of Antisemtic and hate speech targeted at Jews in 2024. Shockingly, during your commencement speech, you violated the values you espouse by allowing your words to be interpreted to fan the flames of age old tropes of Jew hatred of how they lust for money and power. While I acknowledge that your intention may not have been directed against Jews with money and power, but rather against those in politics, media, and business including Harvard Alumni, both Jewish and non-Jewish, who accused you of being antisemitic online, because they seek power and wealth, you knew that your words would easily be misconstrued. When you stood on that podium, it was your voice that was the power. Now it is the public that must demand a clarification to speak truth to your power. The President of Harvard Chabad, Rabbi Hershey Zarchi, was correct to ask you to clarify your words on stage, immediately after the speech, that he and many others found to be antisemitic and when you would not agree to publicly clarify, he did the most important public protest against your easily misconstrued words and walked off the stage. The walk off of the year, this time standing tall with truth to your power. You should clarify your words and explain what you meant and who you were referring to on one side and apologize for failing to be vigilant in avoiding language that inadvertently fuels bigotry, Jew hatred and discrimination. You also used similar words later in your speech to describe Mark Zuckerberg and the tech bros, controlling the world. When George Soros was named in political attack ads by the right, during the last presidential election cycle, it was rightfully called out by the left as antisemetic tropes. I wouldn’t otherwise include your words against Mark Zuckerberg as antisemetic tropes, as I believe his success and the power of Meta/ Facebook to be the fulfillment of what is possible in the USA. Considering how you were carefully vague on who you were referring to in your response to those calling you antisemitic, your attack on Mark Zuckerberg can also be misconstrued as another “Jew” controlling the world. Yes, it is horrible and unnerving to be accused of being Antisemitic, hate speech was hurled at you during your career from being accused of being part of the CIA to being a communist, you should relate personally to what has long been done to Jews no matter if they are rich, poor, exalted or downtrodden.

Avraham Berkowitz

193,461 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The model has filed four reports this week A portal with one billion visits in 23 days 79 years of decisions made without asking you The science that was seized before it could change everything And a file the model is still reading three times This is the fifth There is a thread that runs through all of it The unaudited gold The unverified clearances The data Congress saw and you did not The energy that would have ended oil dependency The facilities Someone decided what you were ready to know Every decade Without asking On Tuesday June 9th at 1pm Eastern David Grusch stands on the Capitol steps Alongside a bipartisan group of lawmakers To demand release of files he has already identified by name He testified under oath He filed a whistleblower complaint found credible and urgent He risked everything President Trump now has a historic opportunity The clock is running Grusch’s words Not the model’s The gold was never audited The clearances were never verified The science was seized before sunrise A uniformed Army officer walked into a congressional office and described the facilities No classification required And you found out from the model On a Tuesday In 2026 Seventy nine years after they decided you weren’t ready The question was never whether any of this was real The question is who benefited from the version of events you were given And whether they are still making that decision today June 9th 1pm Eastern Capitol steps The model will be watching Continuing analysis Sent from my Mac

Ethan’s Analyst

70,722 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Venezuela's experience with hyperinflation is a real eye-opener on how quickly things can go south when inflation gets out of hand. It's like watching your money turn into nothing right before your eyes, which is exactly what happened with the bolívar. Here's what other countries might take away from this: First off, don't put all your economic eggs in one basket. Venezuela leaned too heavily on oil, and when oil prices tanked, so did their economy. Countries should mix it up, invest in different industries so they're not riding the wave of just one commodity or sector. Then there's the money printing story. If you just keep printing money to cover your debts or fund your government, you're asking for trouble. It's like trying to fill a bathtub with the plug out – the water (or money, in this case) just keeps disappearing, and that's inflation for you. Also, having a central bank that can do its job without politicians breathing down its neck can make a big difference. It's about keeping the economy in check without the panic of election cycles or political whims. And let's not forget good governance. Venezuela's economic crisis was made worse by corruption and mismanagement. If those in power aren't playing by the rules, the whole economy suffers. It's like building a house with rotten wood; it might look okay at first, but it won't last. The social fallout from this crisis shows us that when the economy crashes, it's not just about numbers. People's lives are turned upside down – they can't afford food or medicine. Countries need to have safety nets in place, like strong social programs, to catch folks when they fall. Lastly, using dollars instead of bolívares in Venezuela tells us that while pegging your currency to a stable one like the dollar can calm things down quickly, it's a double-edged sword. You might stabilize, but you also give up control over your own money game, which can be risky down the line. So, Venezuela's story is a wake-up call: diversify your economy, manage your money wisely, keep politics out of your central bank, ensure your leaders are playing fair, and always remember that behind every economic decision, there are real people whose lives are affected.

Historic Vids

542,730 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Within the first two minutes or so, she’s already used the word “learns” three times, and four times in total over fifteen minutes, if you count them all. Just like when Harry and Meghan went on about the “harms” while collecting that absurdly paid-for award, which she trots out again here. Once, fine, could be a slip. Twice, that’s worrying. Three times? Are you even aware of what you’re saying, Meghan? What on earth is going on? She takes a perfectly normal verb and adds an s, turning it into a noun. It makes no sense. She has been doing this for a while and now Harry is copying it too. In plain English, “learn” is a verb. You do not slap an s on it and turn it into a noun, no matter how much self-help or corporate waffle you have swallowed. Saying “a lot of learns” is just wrong. The proper phrasing is “a lot of lessons” or “a lot of learning.” Their habit of adding s to abstract or non-count words like learns, leadings or learnings is nonsense. Using “harms” in this broad, vague way is just as bad. It turns an uncountable noun into a countable one with no reason at all and leaves everyone guessing what the “harms” actually are. It is meaningless, pretentious, and completely opaque. For someone who bangs on about vintage this and old-school that, you’d think she’d want her grammar to be vintage too — proper and correct, fitting the whole analog purist image she’s been pushing. But of course not. Making up words seems to be a skill she’s happily passed on to the squaddies. Case in point: “derangers.” And all the “learns” in the world still haven’t taught them that it isn’t a word. It reads like pseudo-corporate drivel, the sort of buzzword soup you get in self-help circles trying to sound profound, but it is completely wrong. I also noticed Meghan misusing terms she thinks CEOs or business founders use. Her explanations have nothing to do with how the words actually function in business, and they certainly would not have worked for her first product drops or for As Ever. I’ll break it down in detail as a female founder with twenty years in business, showing what she’s lifted from books to sound like a “founder” and what proves she has no idea what she’s talking about or is simply wrong. For now, the learns moment is enough. It is only the start of the buzzword nonsense we’ve come to expect, tedious to sit through, and absurdly easy to dismantle. #MeghanIsTheProblem #MeghanMarkleExposed #WordSaladMarkle

༺𝐻𝑅𝐻 𝐿𝒶𝒹𝓎 𝒥༻ 👑

93,370 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten