Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Sydney Sweeney ad + hypocrisy explained

167,828 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

23 Comments

Corey's profile picture
Corey1 month ago

Why is it a problem when she does it but not a problem when women have been doing that ad for decades

DEWIGHTkSCHRUTE's profile picture
DEWIGHTkSCHRUTE1 month ago

I bet all these women also hate Sydney Sweeney

Laura's profile picture
Laura1 month ago

Hypocrites

ted's profile picture
ted1 month ago

What about the female athletes taking the same pics ?

Jan Darwin's profile picture
Jan Darwin1 month ago

⬇️⬆️

Monseigneur's profile picture
Monseigneur1 month ago

How is this porn? Yes, it may be pretty explicit but sexualization of advertisement has been happening for ages & is legal. We see it everywhere.

rzrshrp/whpsmrt's profile picture
rzrshrp/whpsmrt1 month ago

The logical woman is a unicorn. Thank you, unicorn lady 🙏❤️

James Hill's profile picture
James Hill1 month ago

Ordinary women apply makeup everyday, they wear skin tight leggings two sizes too small to the gym, they surgically enhance their faces... Almost every young woman exploits male sexuality everyday. The only difference is you're not a millionaire due to it, and she is.

JJJJazzman's profile picture
JJJJazzman1 month ago

She has equity in the company and did an amazing job getting attention to the company she has a stake in. She should actually be praised for that because she is going to make a lot of money

AJ Bracken's profile picture
AJ Bracken1 month ago

Wow, your consistent verbal ability to get concepts across is on a GOAT level!

Shawn Craig's profile picture
Shawn Craig1 month ago

Fellas Wakeup A woman barely held together by silicone and Botox doesn’t mean she’s attractive She has been brainwashed by hookup apps the quizzes articles in Cosmo Vogue along with politically correct TV shows into thinking life is supposed to be an emotional roller of drama

Yoryi.RD's profile picture
Yoryi.RD1 month ago

This is what represent them and that's fine. Just open the expentrum.

Maximillian Greenwalt's profile picture
Maximillian Greenwalt1 month ago

It would be an honor to meet you ma’am. Keep it coming please. God bless you.

T Lussow's profile picture
T Lussow1 month ago

This. All. Day. Long 👏

Prof. Suggon Deeznuts's profile picture
Prof. Suggon Deeznuts1 month ago

Thank you

NotreDamin's profile picture
NotreDamin1 month ago

Women...

Annex Media Africa's profile picture
Annex Media Africa1 month ago

thx Chloe for calling this out

mindya's profile picture
mindya1 month ago

The only consistency is the inconsistency.

DebbietheG's profile picture
DebbietheG1 month ago

🙌 A nuanced way to break down & highlight the latest reason to be “offended.” Sweeney, swung back 2 show athletes who posed nude. Hucksters on the “V,” rationalize w/ “they’re athletes,” it’s different lol. Agree too, inappropriate for kids which is why it lands in soft “P.”

Jonathan Maurice's profile picture
Jonathan Maurice1 month ago

Chloe, you're a cool chick. 👌👍😎🇺🇸

Louis De Klerk's profile picture
Louis De Klerk1 month ago

Do ppl ever ask if its appropriate for children to see the things they see in 'sex ed' at a young age? Or at Pride Parades? No. We can't ask either of those questions.

Clark ''Starlord'' Banner, The Realist's profile picture
Clark ''Starlord'' Banner, The Realist1 month ago

It's not porn

Piotr's profile picture
Piotr1 month ago

Also apparently a woman can dress how she wants and as little as she wants and it is her business. Sexualisation and objectification are done by creepy men. So which one is it?

Related Videos