Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Ta Raymond Hack got this aspect wrong. The NSL HANDBOOK is clear on what happens when a DRC ruling is appealed. 👇🏾 NSL HANDBOOK: “24.4. An appeal against an order of the DRC will suspend the operation of that order pending the finalisation of any appeal or arbitration.”

Sgadi28's profile picture

Dabane The Darling

26,961 subscribers

10,802 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & TeknolojiHaberler & PolitikaEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

ADC Crisis:"...ADC should tell Nigerians the truth... What is the judgment/order that the Appeal Court gave that made ADC go on appeal to the Supreme Court...? ..if the order made was not against them, would they have appealed to the Supreme Court...?" - Nyesom Wike, Minister of FCT Wike knows every details of the ADC case more than Peter Obi, Aregebesola etc
5:46

ADC Crisis:"...ADC should tell Nigerians the truth... What is the judgment/order that the Appeal Court gave that made ADC go on appeal to the Supreme Court...? ..if the order made was not against them, would they have appealed to the Supreme Court...?" - Nyesom Wike, Minister of FCT Wike knows every details of the ADC case more than Peter Obi, Aregebesola etc

Àkànní

206,387 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Malema on the SANDF soldiers that were killed in the DRC: What M23 did to us is an actual declaration of war against South Africa.#sabcnews
1:00

Malema on the SANDF soldiers that were killed in the DRC: What M23 did to us is an actual declaration of war against South Africa.#sabcnews

Natasha Nokuthula Phiri

191,212 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Mykhailo Mudryk has lodged an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport against a four‑year drugs ban imposed by the FA.
1:10

Mykhailo Mudryk has lodged an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport against a four‑year drugs ban imposed by the FA.

BBC Sport

37,943 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

BREAKING: Virginia Circuit Court has ruled yesterday’s redistricting vote UNCONSTITUTIONAL and issued an injunction BLOCKING certification of the results. A final order is expected and an immediate appeal will follow.
2:00

BREAKING: Virginia Circuit Court has ruled yesterday’s redistricting vote UNCONSTITUTIONAL and issued an injunction BLOCKING certification of the results. A final order is expected and an immediate appeal will follow.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

24,698 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The former president of the DRC Joseph Kabila is back in Goma DRC. This is what he said earlier about the situation in that country. #sabcnews
0:29

The former president of the DRC Joseph Kabila is back in Goma DRC. This is what he said earlier about the situation in that country. #sabcnews

Sophie Mokoena

212,829 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Tomorrow the Supreme Court will decide to take Donald Trump’s appeal of Birthright Citizenship President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship is currently struck down nationwide by lower court rulings Monday the Justices could take the appeal! “This is big because as soon as tomorrow, the Supreme Court could say whether it will hear an appeal that could redefine birthright citizenship. Justices met Friday at their private weekly conference considering an appeal by the Trump Administration. Remember, on his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order declaring that only newborns who have parents with permanent legal status in the US are eligible for birthright citizenship. Now, federal courts have blocked that order as unconstitutional, citing more than a century of legal precedent. The 14th Amendment citizenship clause that all persons born or naturalized in the US are citizens was ratified after the Civil War. Researchers estimate that this appeal could impact as many as 255,000 children born in the US each year to one or more parents without American citizenship or permanent legal status.“
1:02

Tomorrow the Supreme Court will decide to take Donald Trump’s appeal of Birthright Citizenship President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship is currently struck down nationwide by lower court rulings Monday the Justices could take the appeal! “This is big because as soon as tomorrow, the Supreme Court could say whether it will hear an appeal that could redefine birthright citizenship. Justices met Friday at their private weekly conference considering an appeal by the Trump Administration. Remember, on his first day in office, President Trump signed an executive order declaring that only newborns who have parents with permanent legal status in the US are eligible for birthright citizenship. Now, federal courts have blocked that order as unconstitutional, citing more than a century of legal precedent. The 14th Amendment citizenship clause that all persons born or naturalized in the US are citizens was ratified after the Civil War. Researchers estimate that this appeal could impact as many as 255,000 children born in the US each year to one or more parents without American citizenship or permanent legal status.“

Wall Street Apes

110,801 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

What Happened Today In Court Were Deeply Flawed - Kalu The actions of a senior judge, Justice Peter Lifu, have come under scrutiny following a Court of Appeal ruling staying proceedings at the Federal High Court. It is widely understood that decisions of the Court of Appeal are binding on lower courts. Despite the order being brought to his attention. Kalu Kalu, Member, ADC Legal Team
4:11

What Happened Today In Court Were Deeply Flawed - Kalu The actions of a senior judge, Justice Peter Lifu, have come under scrutiny following a Court of Appeal ruling staying proceedings at the Federal High Court. It is widely understood that decisions of the Court of Appeal are binding on lower courts. Despite the order being brought to his attention. Kalu Kalu, Member, ADC Legal Team

ARISE NEWS

44,633 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

NBC is reporting that Trump will eliminate the Department of Education with an executive order. This is an assault on America's children.
2:20

NBC is reporting that Trump will eliminate the Department of Education with an executive order. This is an assault on America's children.

Rep. Ro Khanna

1,094,177 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The High Court on Monday dismissed a case against three brothers, Bharat Ramji, Harish Ramji and Ashvin Ramji, who were arrested by DCI over allegations of forging NSSF transfer documents to obtain land in Athi River, citing an active stay order from the Court of Appeal that barred any prosecution or arrest linked to the matter. Chief Magistrate Dolphina Alego ruled that proceeding with the charges would create fertile ground for conflicting judicial decisions, given that the land dispute is already under review in multiple courts, including the Supreme Court, and that the charge sheet referred to the same land covered by the earlier appellate ruling. The Ramji brothers had challenged the dismissal of their judicial review case in Kiambu, prompting the September 20, 2024, order from a three-judge Court of Appeal bench led by Justices Lesiit, Mativo, and Gachoka, which explicitly paused any arrests or prosecution while the appeal was pending. Lawyers for the family, including senior counsel Nelson Havi, Orange Ndegwa, and Echesa, argued that the recent DCI arrests violated the standing order, effectively risking abuse of court process and conflicting judicial outcomes. The court’s ruling stated that the charges could not proceed because they involved the same land reference number already under appellate review, rendering the application defective and unable to stand until the appeal is resolved.
5:25

The High Court on Monday dismissed a case against three brothers, Bharat Ramji, Harish Ramji and Ashvin Ramji, who were arrested by DCI over allegations of forging NSSF transfer documents to obtain land in Athi River, citing an active stay order from the Court of Appeal that barred any prosecution or arrest linked to the matter. Chief Magistrate Dolphina Alego ruled that proceeding with the charges would create fertile ground for conflicting judicial decisions, given that the land dispute is already under review in multiple courts, including the Supreme Court, and that the charge sheet referred to the same land covered by the earlier appellate ruling. The Ramji brothers had challenged the dismissal of their judicial review case in Kiambu, prompting the September 20, 2024, order from a three-judge Court of Appeal bench led by Justices Lesiit, Mativo, and Gachoka, which explicitly paused any arrests or prosecution while the appeal was pending. Lawyers for the family, including senior counsel Nelson Havi, Orange Ndegwa, and Echesa, argued that the recent DCI arrests violated the standing order, effectively risking abuse of court process and conflicting judicial outcomes. The court’s ruling stated that the charges could not proceed because they involved the same land reference number already under appellate review, rendering the application defective and unable to stand until the appeal is resolved.

Nyakundi Report

28,267 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Supreme Court Decision on ADC Should Not Warrant Celebration, Nothing Has Been Decided - Maduabuchi The ADC had no business at the Supreme Court. There was no appealable decision by the Federal High Court. The Court of Appeal overstepped its bounds by making an order no one sought. In reaching the proper decision that there was no valid appeal by the David Mark faction, the Court of Appeal went a step further and ordered that the _status quo_ be maintained. That was wrong. When INEC, acting on the Court of Appeal’s order, removed David Mark, it was on solid ground. The Appellate Court’s order was to maintain _status quo ante bellum_, not _status quo_. Oba Maduabuchi, SAN
4:10

Supreme Court Decision on ADC Should Not Warrant Celebration, Nothing Has Been Decided - Maduabuchi The ADC had no business at the Supreme Court. There was no appealable decision by the Federal High Court. The Court of Appeal overstepped its bounds by making an order no one sought. In reaching the proper decision that there was no valid appeal by the David Mark faction, the Court of Appeal went a step further and ordered that the _status quo_ be maintained. That was wrong. When INEC, acting on the Court of Appeal’s order, removed David Mark, it was on solid ground. The Appellate Court’s order was to maintain _status quo ante bellum_, not _status quo_. Oba Maduabuchi, SAN

ARISE NEWS

75,564 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Clavicular WASNT HAVING IT when Drago's girlfriend kept giving Meaningless apologies an attitude instead of trying to sort the situation out... 😬👀 'What is this, an appeal to emotion?' Is what she done wrong?
0:56

Clavicular WASNT HAVING IT when Drago's girlfriend kept giving Meaningless apologies an attitude instead of trying to sort the situation out... 😬👀 'What is this, an appeal to emotion?' Is what she done wrong?

Hydrogen💧

13,418 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

WATCH | The Supreme Court of Appeal has dismissed, with costs, the Road Accident Fund’s appeal against a High Court ruling confirming that undocumented foreign nationals can claim from the Fund. Portfolio Committee on Transport chairperson Donald Selamolela says the ruling is a reminder to review the RAF Act.
2:32

WATCH | The Supreme Court of Appeal has dismissed, with costs, the Road Accident Fund’s appeal against a High Court ruling confirming that undocumented foreign nationals can claim from the Fund. Portfolio Committee on Transport chairperson Donald Selamolela says the ruling is a reminder to review the RAF Act.

SABC News

32,786 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE SAYS APPEAL OF HIS DISMISSAL SHOULD NOT PROCEED THIS SATURDAY Teacher Enoch Burke's appeal of his dismissal from Wilson's Hospital School is due to be heard by the Department of Education this Saturday, 13 December. Enoch Burke will speak in court tomorrow. He will argue that the Supreme Court must address the issue of conflicting Court of Appeal judgments in his case before the Department of Education hears his appeal. It is imperative in the interests of justice that this issue be resolved. A three-member division of the Court of Appeal today granted an order that Enoch Burke appear in person before them tomorrow at 2:30pm to apply that this hearing be postponed. There are conflicting judgments of the Court of Appeal regarding the critical question of why Enoch Burke was disciplined by Wilson's Hospital School. This is an extremely serious matter as the school’s Board of Management is relying heavily on a flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed while this matter is unresolved. One judgment from 2023, written by Mr Justice John Edwards, contains the extraordinarily false assertion that "there is no evidence whatever" that Enoch Burke's suspension was because of his views on transgenderism or his refusal to comply with the principal's instruction to call a child "they". Mr Justice Edwards, on foot of this, stated that the constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience are "not engaged" i.e. not relevant to Enoch Burke's case. As stated previously, the Board of Management of Wilson’s Hospital School are relying heavily on this flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. In a later Court of Appeal judgment in 2025, Ms Justice Mary Faherty ruled, on the contrary, that the principal's instruction is "a kernel" of the disciplinary proceedings against Enoch Burke. She stated: "In my view, any reasonable reader of the principal’s report would understand that the principal considered her overarching complaint against the appellant to fall under the heading of refusal to comply with a legitimate instruction resulting in serious consequences, as provided for in the Circular". Notwithstanding this, the second Court of Appeal did not correct the errors of the first Court of Appeal and was unwilling to state that the findings of Mr Justice John Edwards are wrong. Enoch Burke has appealed this issue to the Supreme Court. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed until the Supreme Court hears this case and makes its ruling. Justice must be done.
2:51

BREAKING: ENOCH BURKE SAYS APPEAL OF HIS DISMISSAL SHOULD NOT PROCEED THIS SATURDAY Teacher Enoch Burke's appeal of his dismissal from Wilson's Hospital School is due to be heard by the Department of Education this Saturday, 13 December. Enoch Burke will speak in court tomorrow. He will argue that the Supreme Court must address the issue of conflicting Court of Appeal judgments in his case before the Department of Education hears his appeal. It is imperative in the interests of justice that this issue be resolved. A three-member division of the Court of Appeal today granted an order that Enoch Burke appear in person before them tomorrow at 2:30pm to apply that this hearing be postponed. There are conflicting judgments of the Court of Appeal regarding the critical question of why Enoch Burke was disciplined by Wilson's Hospital School. This is an extremely serious matter as the school’s Board of Management is relying heavily on a flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed while this matter is unresolved. One judgment from 2023, written by Mr Justice John Edwards, contains the extraordinarily false assertion that "there is no evidence whatever" that Enoch Burke's suspension was because of his views on transgenderism or his refusal to comply with the principal's instruction to call a child "they". Mr Justice Edwards, on foot of this, stated that the constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of conscience are "not engaged" i.e. not relevant to Enoch Burke's case. As stated previously, the Board of Management of Wilson’s Hospital School are relying heavily on this flawed judgment for Saturday's hearing. In a later Court of Appeal judgment in 2025, Ms Justice Mary Faherty ruled, on the contrary, that the principal's instruction is "a kernel" of the disciplinary proceedings against Enoch Burke. She stated: "In my view, any reasonable reader of the principal’s report would understand that the principal considered her overarching complaint against the appellant to fall under the heading of refusal to comply with a legitimate instruction resulting in serious consequences, as provided for in the Circular". Notwithstanding this, the second Court of Appeal did not correct the errors of the first Court of Appeal and was unwilling to state that the findings of Mr Justice John Edwards are wrong. Enoch Burke has appealed this issue to the Supreme Court. The Department of Education hearing should not proceed until the Supreme Court hears this case and makes its ruling. Justice must be done.

Enoch Burke

149,178 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The moment an informed citizen told VIO a government institution that what they are doing on the road is illegal and that there is a valid court order of the federal high court and appeal court that they should stop asking and checking for vehicle details. But you know Nigerians and rule of law.
2:06

The moment an informed citizen told VIO a government institution that what they are doing on the road is illegal and that there is a valid court order of the federal high court and appeal court that they should stop asking and checking for vehicle details. But you know Nigerians and rule of law.

ÓMÒÉLÉRÍNJÁRÉ

130,345 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

There is no merit to any claim that President Felix Tshisekedi - UDPS Présidence RDC 🇨🇩 is looking to give away DRC resources to the United States. The resources of the DRC belong to the people of the DRC and to them alone. President Donald J. Trump is looking to invest in the #DRC and for the US to trade with the DRC on an equal basis. Beware of those seeking to disrupt the proposed deal. There are individuals looking for bags of money as bribes and those who aim to stone everything. These are the enemies of the Congo. The US-DRC deal will be transparent and will benefit the people of the DRC. Stand with President Donald J. Trump. Stand with President Felix #Tshisekedi. 🇺🇸🇨🇩 House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems Department of State U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs
1:28

There is no merit to any claim that President Felix Tshisekedi - UDPS Présidence RDC 🇨🇩 is looking to give away DRC resources to the United States. The resources of the DRC belong to the people of the DRC and to them alone. President Donald J. Trump is looking to invest in the #DRC and for the US to trade with the DRC on an equal basis. Beware of those seeking to disrupt the proposed deal. There are individuals looking for bags of money as bribes and those who aim to stone everything. These are the enemies of the Congo. The US-DRC deal will be transparent and will benefit the people of the DRC. Stand with President Donald J. Trump. Stand with President Felix #Tshisekedi. 🇺🇸🇨🇩 House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems Department of State U.S. Senior Advisor for Arab and African Affairs

Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C.

20,285 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"For peace to be possible, the #DRC government needs to ensure that all its people, including Rwandaphone Congolese, are safe and have equal opportunities and rights in the reconstruction of their country. In the same fashion, it needs to ensure that the DRC territory is not a source of threats or a safe haven for those threatening the security of its neighbours. It is unfortunate that some politicians prefer rhetorical populism which is externalizing all its problems instead of looking inwards for solutions. Without an honest comprehensive internal process that addresses security and governance challenges, the DRC will not be at peace. Even without M23, the DRC suffers from an ineffective government, with more than 100 rebel groups preying on ordinary civilians. In other words, the DRC needs to make peace with itself; it will, in turn, produce regional peace." Alphonse ✍️
2:47

"For peace to be possible, the #DRC government needs to ensure that all its people, including Rwandaphone Congolese, are safe and have equal opportunities and rights in the reconstruction of their country. In the same fashion, it needs to ensure that the DRC territory is not a source of threats or a safe haven for those threatening the security of its neighbours. It is unfortunate that some politicians prefer rhetorical populism which is externalizing all its problems instead of looking inwards for solutions. Without an honest comprehensive internal process that addresses security and governance challenges, the DRC will not be at peace. Even without M23, the DRC suffers from an ineffective government, with more than 100 rebel groups preying on ordinary civilians. In other words, the DRC needs to make peace with itself; it will, in turn, produce regional peace." Alphonse ✍️

Pan-African Review

30,023 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

#EXCLUSIVE | “The same G.R. Swaminathan has given an order against me — I’m sitting right in front of you — and he has given an order against me in some case. I had to go to another court to get a stay on what he passed against me. I’m just telling you this. So simply because Mr. G.R. Swaminathan gave an order against me, a citizen Annamalai K., did I speak badly about the judge? It is his way of interpreting the law. We always have the higher court to go and appeal.” — K.Annamalai, Vice President, Tamil Nadu BJP #Madurai #Super6 | Akshita Nandagopal
2:37

#EXCLUSIVE | “The same G.R. Swaminathan has given an order against me — I’m sitting right in front of you — and he has given an order against me in some case. I had to go to another court to get a stay on what he passed against me. I’m just telling you this. So simply because Mr. G.R. Swaminathan gave an order against me, a citizen Annamalai K., did I speak badly about the judge? It is his way of interpreting the law. We always have the higher court to go and appeal.” — K.Annamalai, Vice President, Tamil Nadu BJP #Madurai #Super6 | Akshita Nandagopal

IndiaToday

51,376 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce